Tag: WHO

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

WHO Declares International Public Health Emergency over Mpox Outbreak

On By ModernMedia
Mpox (monkeypox) virus. Source: NIH

WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has determined that the upsurge of mpox in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and a growing number of countries in Africa constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) under the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR).

Dr Tedros’s declaration came on the advice of an IHR Emergency Committee of independent experts who met earlier in the day to review data presented by experts from WHO and affected countries. The Committee informed the Director-General that it considers the upsurge of mpox to be a PHEIC, with potential to spread further across countries in Africa and possibly outside the continent.

The Director-General will share the report of the Committee’s meeting and, based on the advice of the Committee, issue temporary recommendations to countries.

In declaring the PHEIC, Dr Tedros said, “The emergence of a new clade of mpox, its rapid spread in eastern DRC, and the reporting of cases in several neighbouring countries are very worrying. On top of outbreaks of other mpox clades in DRC and other countries in Africa, it’s clear that a coordinated international response is needed to stop these outbreaks and save lives.”

WHO Regional Director for Africa Dr Matshidiso Moeti said, “Significant efforts are already underway in close collaboration with communities and governments, with our country teams working on the frontlines to help reinforce measures to curb mpox. With the growing spread of the virus, we’re scaling up further through coordinated international action to support countries bring the outbreaks to an end.”

Committee Chair Professor Dimie Ogoina said, “The current upsurge of mpox in parts of Africa, along with the spread of a new sexually transmissible strain of the monkeypox virus, is an emergency, not only for Africa, but for the entire globe. Mpox, originating in Africa, was neglected there, and later caused a global outbreak in 2022. It is time to act decisively to prevent history from repeating itself.”

This PHEIC determination is the second in two years relating to mpox. Caused by an Orthopoxvirus, mpox was first detected in humans in 1970, in the DRC. The disease is considered endemic to countries in central and west Africa.

In July 2022, the multi-country outbreak of mpox was declared a PHEIC as it spread rapidly via sexual contact across a range of countries where the virus had not been seen before. That PHEIC was declared over in May 2023 after there had been a sustained decline in global cases.

Mpox has been reported in the DRC for more than a decade, and the number of cases reported each year has increased steadily over that period. Last year, reported cases increased significantly, and already the number of cases reported so far this year has exceeded last year’s total, with more than 15 600 cases and 537 deaths.

The emergence last year and rapid spread of a new virus strain in DRC, clade 1b, which appears to be spreading mainly through sexual networks, and its detection in countries neighbouring the DRC is especially concerning, and one of the main reasons for the declaration of the PHEIC.

In the past month, over 100 laboratory-confirmed cases of clade 1b have been reported in four countries neighbouring the DRC that have not reported mpox before: Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda. Experts believe the true number of cases to be higher as a large proportion of clinically compatible cases have not been tested.

Several outbreaks of different clades of mpox have occurred in different countries, with different modes of transmission and different levels of risk.

The two vaccines currently in use for mpox are recommended by WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization, and are also approved by WHO-listed national regulatory authorities, as well as by individual countries including Nigeria and the DRC.

Last week, the Director-General triggered the process for Emergency Use Listing for mpox vaccines, which will accelerate vaccine access for lower-income countries which have not yet issued their own national regulatory approval. Emergency Use Listing also enables partners including Gavi and UNICEF to procure vaccines for distribution.

WHO is working with countries and vaccine manufacturers on potential vaccine donations, and coordinating with partners through the interim Medical Countermeasures Network to facilitate equitable access to vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics and other tools.

WHO anticipates an immediate funding requirement of an initial US$ 15 million to support surveillance, preparedness and response activities. A needs assessment is being undertaken across the three levels of the Organization.

To allow for an immediate scale up, WHO has released US$ 1.45 million from the WHO Contingency Fund for Emergencies and may need to release more in the coming days. The Organization appeals to donors to fund the full extent of needs of the mpox response.

Source: WHO

Categories : Paediatrics VaccinesTags :

Childhood Vaccine Coverage in SA Declined in 2023, Finds WHO Report

On By ModernMedia
A marker used to measure immunisation coverage is to look at whether children received three doses of the vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. Photo by Mufid Majnun on Unsplash

By Elri Voigt

New data from the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF show that globally childhood immunisation coverage stalled in 2023, while in South Africa it decreased. Elri Voigt unpacks the new data and asks local experts to put it in context.

A new report found that vaccination coverage rates around the world have not yet returned to levels seen in 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted immunisation programmes.

There has been no meaningful change in immunisation coverage between 2022 and 2023, according to the WHO and UNICEF report published in July. It means progress in immunisation coverage has effectively stalled, leaving 2.7 million additional children who are either unvaccinated or under-vaccinated compared to pre-pandemic levels in 2019.

A marker used to measure immunisation coverage is to look at whether children received three doses of the vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis – referred to as DTP3. Global coverage for DTP3 stalled at 84% in 2023, according to the report.

At the same time, the number of children worldwide who have not received any vaccinations has increased. We refer to these kids as zero-dose children. Ten countries account for 59% of all zero-dose children, with the global number in 2023 rising to 14.5 million compared to 13.9 million in 2022, according to the report.

Coverage slightly down in SA

Data from the report showed a slight decrease for a number of outcome measures in South Africa between 2022 and 2023. It was one of 14 countries in the African region that saw a decrease in coverage for DTP1 (the first dose of the vaccine for diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis), slipping from 87% in 2022 to 81% in 2023. Coverage for DTP3 also decreased, falling from 85% in 2022 to 79% in 2023.

South Africa was also one of 10 countries in the African region that saw a decrease in coverage for the first dose of the measles vaccine, and was singled out by the report as having the sharpest decline in coverage in the region between 2022 and 2023. Measles coverage dropped from 86% in 2022 to 80% in 2023.

Commenting on the accuracy of the new data, Professor Shabir Madhi, Dean at the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Witwatersrand (Wits), said it used administrative data, which can bias the estimates. He explained that the report bases vaccine coverage on the number of vaccines procured by government and deployed to facilities. For example, if a facility gets 100 doses of the measles vaccine and ends up discarding 50 doses, that doesn’t necessarily get reported.

The WHO acknowledges the potential for data inaccuracies. It stated that they calculate the estimated percentage of immunisation coverage by dividing the number of doses administered to a target population by the estimated number of people in that target population.

Madhi said a more accurate picture of childhood immunisation coverage in the country can be found in National Vaccine coverage surveys, like the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI) National Coverage survey. Spotlight previously reported on results from the most recent EPI survey conducted in 2019.

Madhi said it appears the new report did not incorporate data from the EPI survey. However, even without this data, he said the WHO estimates are not too far off the local data. He remarked that he doesn’t feel “too strongly either way” about the accuracy of the WHO data since the bottom line is vaccine coverage in the country is lagging.

“Fluctuations in immunisation coverage are not uncommon,” Dr Haroon Saloojee, a professor of Child Health at Wits University told Spotlight. “One should not make too much of a fall or increase in coverage rates over one year, unless it is drastic.”

Data from the WHO report for vaccine coverage in South Africa between 2018 and 2022 had actually showed an overall upward trend, which was “promising”, according to Saloojee. However, he said the latest data from the report “holds no good news for South Africa” because the dip in coverage in 2023 was noteworthy.

How does SA compare?

“South Africa’s performance is moderate when compared globally, and poor compared to other high-middle income countries,” said Saloojee. “Considering that South Africa is a high-middle-income country, we should be performing much better in all our health indicators.”

He pointed out that countries in a similar bracket like Cuba and Uruguay have achieved high immunisation coverage through robust healthcare systems and effective public health policies.

Regarding zero-dose children, the report ranked South Africa 6th worst in the African region. In 2022, the country ranked 13th. With a total of 220 000 zero-dose children, the country accounted for 3% of all zero-dose children in the African region. Nigeria had the highest percentage at 32% of all zero-dosed children in the region, followed by Ethiopia with 14%.

‘Dysfunctionality of primary healthcare’

Apart from the international comparisons, Madhi pointed out that South Africa is not meeting its own targets of having at least 90% of children in each district fully vaccinated.

The EPI survey found that only seven of the 52 districts in the country were able to achieve the national target of 90% of children fully vaccinated under one year of age. Together, the data from the survey and the WHO clearly shows that childhood immunisation targets are not being met in the country.

For Madhi, the results from the EPI survey “speaks to dysfunctionality of primary health care in the country”. He said the immunisation of children, which is the bedrock of primary healthcare when it comes to children, acts as a “canary in the mine with regards to how well primary healthcare is working”.

He said South Africa is a leader in the field when it comes to evaluating and introducing vaccines to the public immunisation programme. But when it comes to implementation, for the vast majority of districts we “are falling completely flat on our face and coming short in terms of reaching our own targets”.

Implications for children

The health implications for children who are not unvaccinated or only partially vaccinated are significant.

“They are less protected against what can be life threatening diseases. And those life-threatening diseases include diseases such as measles, but also other life-threatening diseases such as pneumonia,” Madhi said.

“We’re selling ourselves short as a country in addition to actually compromising the health of children by not ensuring that we’re doing everything that’s possible to actually get children to be vaccinated,” Madhi added. “It also comes with other consequences, so it sort of lends South Africa to be more prone to outbreaks.”

Saloojee added that it is also likely that children who are not fully vaccinated are “not receiving many of the other health, education and social development services all children require and that is being provided by government, such as early childhood development services and child support grants”.

The reasons for immunisation coverage lagging are complex and the responsibility for fixing the problem lies with more than just one entity. Spotlight previously reported on some of the reasons children are remaining unvaccinated or under-immunised as identified by the EPI survey.

Madhi said there needs to be a fundamental relook at the country’s immunisation programme. Proper governance structures need to be put in place and the programme will need to be implemented all the way down to the sub-districts. There is also a need for real-time data and monitoring of that data so interventions can be done when children are missing their immunisations. He also suggested ring-fencing funds for vaccines, at either a national or provincial level, to ensure that money earmarked for vaccines are used for that purpose so as to ensure less stock-outs.

“The immunisation programme hasn’t changed much from what I can gather over the past 20 years, let alone the past 10 years. So we can’t expect a different outcome if the strategy that we’re using which has failed is the strategy that you continue pursuing,” Madhi said.

Saloojee said the National Department of Health can play a pivotal role in strengthening the immunisation programme by “providing leadership, resources, and policy support”. He said that to his knowledge the health department is currently preparing a national immunisation strategy to take us to 2030, but the draft is not up to scratch. The strategy, he says, will need to offer clear objectives, establish realistic indicators of, and targets for, measuring success, and attract a fully funded mandate.

Spotlight asked the National Department of Health for comment on the new WHO report and how it plans to respond to improve immunisation coverage. While the department acknowledged our questions, they did not provide comment by the time this article was first published.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article

Categories : Healthcare Politics and Regulations Respiratory DiseasesTags :

WHO Requests Information on Respiratory Illness Cluster in Northern China

On By ModernMedia

The World Health Organization (WHO) noted an upsurge of unidentified pneumonia-like respiratory illnesses among children in Northern China, and asked China for more information. This is significant as previous outbreaks of severe respiratory illnesses have started out in this fashion, but such WHO requests for more information on disease clusters are routine as part of its monitoring. No “unusual or novel pathogens” have been found, according to China, which attributed it to an increase in multiple pathogens and the lifting of COVID restrictions.

Earlier this month, China’s National Health Commission reported a nationwide increase in respiratory disease incidence, mostly among children. This increase was attributed to lifting of COVID restrictions and the arrival of the cold season, and due to circulating known pathogens including Mycoplasma pneumonia and RSV, which are known to affect children more than adults.

On 22 November 2023, the WHO identified media and ProMED reports about clusters of undiagnosed pneumonia in children’s hospitals in Beijing, Liaoning and other places in China. The WHO requested from China additional epidemiologic and clinical information, as well as lab results from these cases and data about recent trends in circulating respiratory pathogens.

The WHO held a teleconference with Chinese health authorities and received data indicating an increase in outpatient consultations and hospital admissions of children due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia since May, and RSV, adenovirus and influenza virus since October. Some of these increases are earlier in the season than usual, but not unexpected given the lifting of COVID restrictions, as similarly experienced in other countries. No changes in the disease presentation were reported by the Chinese health authorities, who said no unusual or novel pathogens or unusual clinical presentations had been detected, but only the general increase in respiratory illnesses by known pathogens. Local hospitals had not been overloaded by new cases.

Risk assessment

In the current outbreak of respiratory illness, the reported symptoms are common to several respiratory diseases and, as of now, at the present time, Chinese surveillance and hospital systems report that the clinical manifestations are caused by known pathogens in circulation. M. pneumoniae is a common respiratory pathogen and a common cause of paediatric pneumonia, and is readily treated with antibiotics.

China has stepped up its influenza-like illness (ILI) and severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) sentinel surveillance system since mid-October, including for M. pneumoniae.

There is limited detailed information available to fully characterize the overall risk of these reported cases of respiratory illness in children. However, due to the arrival of the winter season, the increasing trend in respiratory illnesses is expected; co-circulation of respiratory viruses may increase burden on health care facilities.

According to surveillance data reported to WHO’s FluNet and published by the National Influenza Centre in China, ILI was above usual levels for this time of year and increasing in the northern provinces. Influenza detections were predominantly A(H3N2) and B/Victoria lineage viruses.

WHO advice

The WHO advice was for people in China to take measures against respiratory illnesses, including vaccines, masking and social distancing. It also does not recommend any specific measures for travellers to China.

Source: WHO

Categories : COVIDTags : 1 Comment

WHO Updates COVID Treatment Guidelines

On By ModernMedia
Photo: CC0

A panel of international experts representing the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Guideline Development Group has updated its guidance on treatments for patients with COVID.

The new recommendations published by The BMJ are part of a living guideline, developed by the WHO with the methodological support of MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation, to provide up to date, trustworthy guidance on the management of COVID and help doctors make better decisions with their patients.

The guidance incorporates the latest clinical trial evidence for existing and new COVID therapies and takes account of evidence relating to safety, prognosis, resources, access, and equity issues, as well as patient values and preferences. 

The updates include:

  • Distinct risk categories to help doctors more accurately assess whether an individual is at high, moderate, or low risk of hospital admission and tailor treatment accordingly.
  • A new treatment benefit threshold of 1.5% (down from 6%) reduction in the risk of hospital admission. This reflects the lower baseline risk for most patients with non-severe COVID as well as more safety evidence and wider availability of therapies.
  • A recommendation to use the antiviral drug nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in patients with non-severe COVID at high and moderate risk of hospital admission.
  • A recommendation against use of the antiviral drugs remdesivir and molnupiravir for patients with non-severe COVID at moderate and low risk of hospital admission (treatment is suggested for patients at high risk of admission).
  • A recommendation against use of a new antiviral (VV116) for patients with COVID except in clinical trials, regardless of illness severity.
  • A strong recommendation against the use of ivermectin for patients with non-severe COVID(advice against use of ivermectin in patients with severe or critical COVID, except in clinical trials, still exists).

The experts say the new recommendations reflect changes in the virulence and transmissibility of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants and sub-variants, along with changes in immunity related to global vaccinations, which have led to lower baseline risks of severe illness and death for most patients with non-severe COVID.

They acknowledge that there are still uncertainties around COVID therapeutics and emerging evidence and say these recommendations need to be used in light of these uncertainties.

An interactive decision support tool is available to accompany this guidance.

Source: The BMJ

Categories : COVIDTags :

WHO Downgrades COVID from Public Health Emergency

On By ModernMedia

The World Health Organization has announced that it was downgrading COVID from its previous status as a public health emergency of international concern, but noted that the pandemic is still not over. Recent spikes have occurred in Southeast Asia and the Middle East, and the agency warns that thousands of people a day are still dying from the virus. It also made a number of recommendations for national healthcare systems to maintain the gains made against the virus and for pandemic preparedness.

The WHO’s International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) Emergency Committee had been following the decline in hospital and ICU missions along with the growth of immunity, and decided in its meeting on Thursday 4 May that it was time to recommend a transition to long-term management.

“It’s with great hope that I declare COVID-19 over as a global health emergency,” WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said, concurring the Committee’s advice.

“That does not mean COVID-19 is over as a global health threat,” he said, adding he wouldn’t hesitate to reconvene experts to reassess the situation should COVID-19 “put our world in peril.”

He also expressed concern that even though infections were down, COVID-19 surveillance was falling.

While various governments had been transitioning down for a while, this marks a major step for the WHO. The virus killed millions and sent the global economy into a nosedive, plunging millions more into poverty and reversing many decades of socioeconomic development.

While COVID was no longer considered to be an ongoing global threat, the WHO made number of recommendations for countries:

Sustain the national capacity gains and prepare for future events.

Integrate COVID-19 vaccination into life course vaccination programmes.

Bring together information from diverse respiratory pathogen surveillance data sources to allow for a comprehensive situational awareness.

Prepare for medical countermeasures to be authourised within national regulatory frameworks to ensure long-term availability and supply.

Continue to work with communities and their leaders to achieve strong, resilient, and inclusive risk communications and community engagement (RCCE) and infodemic management programmes.

Continue to lift COVID-19 international travel related health measures

Continue to support COVID-19 research.

Source: NPR

Categories : COVIDTags :

WHO Updates SARS-CoV-2 Definitions to Reflect Omicron Dominance

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay CC0

The World Health Organization (WHO) announced that it has updated its tracking system and working definitions for variants of SARS-CoV-2, to better reflect the current global variant landscape, to independently evaluate Omicron sublineages in circulation, and classify new variants more clearly when required.

Omicron variants now accounts for 98% of circulating SARS-CoV-2, and new variants will likely emerge from this genetic background. Based on its latest risk assessment [PDF], South Africa has reported a strong increase in XBB.1.5 from 1% in December 2022, to 10% in January 2023, and 76% as of the latest report from February 2023.

Based on comparisons of antigenic cross reactivity using animal sera, replication studies in experimental models of the human respiratory tract, and evidence from clinical and epidemiological studies in humans, WHO experts conclude that, compared to previous variants, Omicron represents the most divergent variant of concern (VOC) seen so far. Since its emergence, Omicron viruses have continued to evolve genetically and antigenically with an expanding range of sublineages, which so far have had all been characterised by evasion of existing population immunity and a preference to infect the upper respiratory tract (versus lower respiratory tract), as compared to pre-Omicron VOCs.

The previous system classified all Omicron sublineages as part of the Omicron VOC and was not detailed enough to compare new descendent lineages with altered phenotypes to the Omicron parent lineages (BA.1, BA.2, BA.4/BA.5). So, WHO variant tracking system will consider the classification of Omicron sublineages independently as variants under monitoring (VUMs), variants of interest (VOIs), or VOCs.

WHO is also updating the working definitions for VOCs and VOIs. The main update consists in making the VOC definition more specific, to include major SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary steps that require major public health interventions.

In addition, going forward, WHO will assign Greek labels for VOCs, and will no longer do so for VOIs.

With these changes factored in, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta as well as the Omicron parent lineage (B.1.1.529) are considered previously circulating VOCs. WHO has now classified XBB.1.5 as a VOI. 

WHO emphasizes that these changes do not imply that the circulation of Omicron viruses no longer pose a threat to public health. Rather, the changes have been made in order to better identify additional or new threats over and above those posed by the current Omicron viruses in circulation.

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and Conditions Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Despite Disagreement, WHO Sounds Highest Alert for Monkeypox

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay CC0

On 22 July, World Health Organisation (WHO) director general Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared the global spread of monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) – a move which went against the recommendation of a special committee. This was the first time since the PHEIC’s inception in 2005 that it had done so. The special committee’s reluctance to recommend a PHEIC has previously drawn criticism from public health experts.

The 21 July meeting of WHO’s Emergency Committee, did not reach a consensus on whether to declare the growing monkeypox outbreak a PHEIC; a narrow majority voting against doing so. But Dr Tedros invoked a PHEIC at a press conference the next day in Geneva. “We have an outbreak that has spread around the world rapidly, through new modes of transmission, about which we understand too little and which meets the criteria in the International Health Regulations,” he said.

Data presented during the meeting including modelling which showed the basic reproduction number (R0) to be above 1 among gay or bisexual men, and below 1 in other groups. For example, in Spain, the estimated R0 is 1.8, in the United Kingdom 1.6, and in Portugal 1.4.

In June, the committee first recommended against declaring a PHEIC , which was roundly criticised by epidemiologists and global health experts. Dr Tedros reconvened the group this week and asked it to reconsider the question. Nine members were against declaring a PHEIC and six in favour, Dr Tedros said at the press conference.

According to Science, the Thursday meeting of the expert panel was followed by tense exchanges via email and text messages between its participants.

One of the objections to a PHEIC was that few deaths had been caused by the disease so far and was not spreading in the general population. Another was that a PHEIC could possibly lead to further stigmatisation of men who have sex with men (MSM), the group primarily affected.

Many gay rights and sexual health advocates were for the PHEIC, as it would help raise awareness and help protect the most at-risk group of MSM.

“Although I’m declaring a public health emergency of international concern, for the moment, this is an outbreak that’s concentrated among men who have sex with men, especially those with multiple sexual partners,” Dr Tedros said. “That means that this is an outbreak that can be stopped with the right strategies in the right groups.”

Those who push for declaring a PHEIC also cited the rising number of monkeypox cases (over 15 000) and the countries affected (70), and that many cases are likely still not being picked up. The virus could also potentially establish itself permanently worldwide – indeed, the CDC reported that two children in the US had been infected.

Sources familiar with the deliberations of the committee said the votes for a PHEIC were driven by those with expertise in monkeypox and LGBT health, and those against by more generalist global heath voices.

According to Science, sources familiar with the committee’s deliberation said that those in favour of a PHEIC had monkeypox and LGBT health expertise, and those against were from a global health standpoint.

While a PHEIC can give the WHO some extra powers, it is the loudest level of alert it can sound. Since its creation in 2005, PHEIC has been declared six times: for outbreaks of H1N1 influenza, polio, Zika, COVID (ongoing), and twice for Ebola outbreaks (one ongoing).

Source: Science.org

Categories : Respiratory DiseasesTags :

WHO Announces Guidance Updates to Treatment of Drug-resistant TB

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay CC0

The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Tuberculosis Programme has announced upcoming updates to the guidance on the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). These updates are announced in a Rapid Communication and include shorter novel 6-month all-oral regimens for the treatment of multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB), with or without additional resistance to fluoroquinolones (pre-XDR-TB), and also an alternative 9-month all-oral regimen for the treatment of MDR/RR-TB.

The Rapid Communication is released ahead of updated WHO consolidated guidelines to come later in the year which will inform national programmes and stakeholders.

Dr Tereza Kasaeva, Director of WHO’s Global TB Programme said: “We now have more and much better treatment options for people with drug-resistant TB thanks to research generating new evidence. This is major progress compared to what was available even a few years ago, and will be of great benefit for people struggling with TB and drug-resistant TB, resulting in better outcomes, saving lives and reducing suffering.”

All patients with MDR/RR-TB, including those with additional resistance to fluoroquinolones, stand to benefit from effective all-oral treatment regimens, either shorter or longer, implemented under programmatic conditions.

The summary of the updates are as follows:

The 6-month BPaLM regimen, comprising bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid (600 mg) and moxifloxacin, may be used programmatically in place of 9-month or longer (>18 months) regimens, in patients (aged ≥ 15 years) with MDR/RR-TB who have not had previous exposure to bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid (defined as > 1 month exposure). This regimen may be used without moxifloxacin (BPaL) in the case of documented resistance to fluoroquinolones (in patients with pre-XDR-TB). Drug susceptibility testing (DST) to fluoroquinolones is strongly encouraged, but DST should not delay treatment initiation.

The 9-month, all-oral, bedaquiline-containing regimens are preferred over the longer (>18 months) regimen in adults and children with MDR/RR-TB, without previous exposure to second-line treatment (including bedaquiline), without fluoroquinolone resistance and with no extensive pulmonary TB disease or severe extrapulmonary TB. In these regimens, 2 months of linezolid (600 mg) can be used as an alternative to 4 months of ethionamide. Access to rapid DST for ruling out fluoroquinolone resistance is required before starting a patient on one of these regimens.

Patients with extensive forms of DR-TB (eg XDR-TB4) or those who are not eligible for or have failed shorter treatment regimens will benefit from an individualised longer regimen designed using the priority grouping of medicines recommended in current WHO guidelines.6

Decisions on appropriate regimens should be made according to clinical judgement and patient preference, considering results of DST, patient treatment history, risk of adverse events, and severity and site of the disease.

All treatment should be delivered under WHO-recommended standards, including patient-centred care and support, informed consent where necessary, principles of good clinical practice, active drug safety monitoring and management, and regular monitoring of patients and of drug resistance to assess regimen effectiveness.

The full details of the regimens included in the review are available in the Rapid Communication.

Source: World Health Organization

Categories : COVIDTags :

WHO Panel Recommends Paxlovid for at-Risk Mild COVID

On By ModernMedia
Image from Pixabay

Pfizer’s oral antiviral Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir) is strongly recommended for patients with non-severe COVID with greater hospitalisation risk, such as unvaccinated, older, or immunosuppressed patients, according to a WHO Guideline Development Group writing in The BMJ. 

The experts explained that Pfizer’s Paxlovid, a comnbination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir tablets, is likely a better choice for these patients because it may prevent more hospitalisations than the alternatives, is safer than molnupiravir, and is easier to administer than intravenous options such as remdesivir and antibody treatments. 

Use in low-risk patients is not recommended due to trivial benefits. It is also not recommended for patients with severe or critical COVID, as there are currently no trial data on nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for this group.

Their recommendation is based on new data from two randomised controlled trials with 3100 patients.

In these trials, moderate certainty evidence showed that nirmatrelvir/ritonavir reduced hospital admission (84 fewer admissions per 1000 patients), low certainty evidence suggested no important difference in mortality, and high certainty evidence suggested little or no risk of adverse effects leading to drug discontinuation.

Additionally, WHO also makes a conditional (weak) recommendation to use the antiviral drug remdesivir for patients with non-severe COVID at highest risk of hospitalisation.

This is based on new data from five randomised controlled trials involving 2700 patients and replaces a previous recommendation against treatment with remdesivir in all patients with covid-19 regardless of disease severity.

Antiviral drugs should be administered as early as possible, but this may be challenging in low- and middle-income countries, the panel noted, and also that access to these drugs is tied to COVID tests.

The emergence of resistance is also an uncertain risk, they add.

This guidance adds to previous conditional recommendations for the use of molnupiravir for high-risk patients with non-severe COVID and for the use of sotrovimab or casirivimab-imdevimab (monoclonal antibody treatments) in selected patients; and against the use of convalescent plasma, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in patients with COVID regardless of disease severity. For patients with severe COVID, WHO strongly recommends corticosteroids, with the addition of IL-6 receptor blockers or baricitinib.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : General Interest Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

WHO Condemns Attacks on Hospitals in Ukraine

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay CC0

On Sunday 13 March, the World Health Organization released a statement condemning recent attacks on hospitals and other healthcare facilities in Ukraine, which it called “horrific”. It also called for an immediate end of all such attacks, which are killing and injuring both patients and health care workers, as well as threatening vital health services.

“To attack the most vulnerable – babies, children, pregnant women, and those already suffering from illness and disease, and health workers risking their own lives to save lives – is an act of unconscionable cruelty,” the organisation said.

WHO’s Surveillance System for Attacks on Health Care (SSA) has documented 31 attacks on health care since the outset of the war that started with the Russian invasion on 24 February, now in its third week. These include 24 incidents of damage to or destruction of health care facilities, and five cases of ambulances.

In one incident, a maternity hospital was hit by a Russian air strike, causing three deaths including a child.

There have been 12 deaths and 34 injuries as a result of these attacks, and impaired access to and availability of essential health services, the WHO stated. Since attacks are ongoing, this is expected to continue.

The organisation also stresses that such attacks also directly impact the needs of vulnerable groups, and the health care needs of pregnant women, new mothers, younger children and older people inside Ukraine are rising even as violence curtails health care access.

“For example, more than 4,300 births have occurred in Ukraine since the start of war and 80 000 Ukrainian women are expected to give birth in next three months. Oxygen and medical supplies, including for the management of pregnancy complications, are running dangerously low,” the WHO statement read. WHO warned that Ukraine’s health care system is “clearly under significant strain” and a collapse would be a “catastrophe”. It stresses that “every effort must be made” to prevent this.

“International humanitarian and human rights law must be upheld, and the protection of civilians must be our top priority.

They call for international humanitarian and human rights laws to be upheld, with the protection of civilians as a top priority. Aid and health care workers must be able to continue and strengthen service delivery, and health services should be provided at border crossing, to provide prompt care and referral for children and pregnant people. Care should be unimpeded, with access to civilians in all areas of the conflict, and health care and services should be protected from attacks.

WHO stated that, in the wake of COVID’s huge strain, “such attacks have the potential to be even more devastating for the civilian population.” As such, it called for an urgent ceasefire.

“Finally, we call for an immediate ceasefire, which includes unhindered access so that people in need can access humanitarian assistance. A peaceful resolution to end the war in Ukraine is possible.”

Source: World Health Organization