Tag: vitamin D

Vitamin D Supplements may Ward off Dementia

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

Taking vitamin D supplements may help ward off dementia, according to a new, large-scale study published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring.

Canadian and UK researchers explored the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and dementia in more than 12 388 participants of the US National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center, who had a mean age of 71 and were dementia-free when they signed up.

The team found that taking vitamin D was associated with living dementia-free for longer, and they also found 40% fewer dementia diagnoses in the group who took supplements.

Of the group, 2696 participants progressed to dementia over ten years; amongst them, 2017 (75%) had no exposure to vitamin D throughout all visits prior to dementia diagnosis, and 679 (25%) had baseline exposure.

Professor Zahinoor Ismail, of the University of Calgary and University of Exeter, who led the research, said: “We know that vitamin D has some effects in the brain that could have implications for reducing dementia, however so far, research has yielded conflicting results. Our findings give key insights into groups who might be specifically targeted for vitamin D supplementation. Overall, we found evidence to suggest that earlier supplementation might be particularly beneficial, before the onset of cognitive decline.”

While Vitamin D was effective in all groups, the team found that effects were significantly greater in females, compared to males. Similarly, effects were greater in people with normal cognition, compared to those who reported signs of mild cognitive impairment – changes to cognition which have been linked to a higher risk of dementia.

The effects of vitamin D were also significantly greater in people who did not carry the APOEe4 gene, known to present a higher risk for Alzheimer’s dementia, compared to non-carriers. The authors suggest that people who carry the APOEe4 gene absorb vitamin D better from their intestine, which might reduce the vitamin D supplementation effect. However, no blood levels were drawn to test this hypothesis.

Previous research has found that low levels of vitamin D are linked to higher dementia risk. Vitamin D is involved in the clearance of amyloid in the brain, the accumulation of which is one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. Studies have also found that vitamin D may provide help to protect the brain against build-up of tau, another protein involved in the development of dementia.

Co-author Dr Byron Creese, at the University of Exeter, said: “Preventing dementia or even delaying its onset is vitally important given the growing numbers of people affected. The link with vitamin D in this study suggests that taking vitamin D supplements may be beneficial in preventing or delaying dementia, but we now need clinical trials to confirm whether this is really the case. The ongoing VitaMIND study at the University of Exeter is exploring this issue further by randomly assigning participants to either take vitamin D or placebo and examining changes in memory and thinking tests over time.”

Source: University of Exeter

Vitamin D Supplements may Reduce Skin Cancer Risk

Melanoma cells. Source: National Cancer Institute.

Fewer cases of melanoma were observed among regular users of vitamin D supplements than among non-users, researchers in Finland found. People taking vitamin D supplements regularly also had a considerably lower risk of skin cancer, according to a study of nearly 500 people with increased skin cancer risk, which was published in Melanoma Research.

A key micronutrient, vitamin D may play a role in many diseases. Previous studies investigating the link between vitamin D and skin cancers, have been inconclusive or contradictory, but they mainly focussed on serum levels of calcidiol, which is a metabolite of vitamin D. Serum calcidiol levels have been associated with both a slightly higher or lower risk of different skin cancers. This may be partly due to the fact that serum calcidiol analyses do not provide information on vitamin D metabolism in the human skin, which can express enzymes that generate biologically active vitamin D metabolites or inactivate them.

The new study took a different approach: 498 adult patients with an increased risk of a skin cancer, such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or melanoma, were recruited and classified into low risk, moderate risk and high risk. Based on their use of oral vitamin D supplements, the patients were divided into three groups: non-users, occasional users and regular users. Serum calcidiol levels were analysed in half of the patients and found to correspond to their self-reported use of vitamin D.

A key finding of the study is that there were considerably fewer cases of melanoma among regular users of vitamin D than among non-users, and that the skin cancer risk classification of regular users was considerably better than non-users’. Logistic regression analysis showed that melanoma risk among regular users was more than halved compared to non-users.

The findings suggest that even occasional users of vitamin D may have a lower risk for melanoma than non-users. However, there was no statistically significant association between the use of vitamin D and the severity of photoaging, facial photoaging, actinic keratoses, nevus count, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Serum calcidiol levels were not significantly associated with these skin changes, either. Since the research design was cross-sectional, the researchers were unable to demonstrate a causal relationship.

Other relatively recent studies, too, have provided evidence of the benefits of vitamin D in melanoma, such as of the association of vitamin D with a less aggressive melanoma.

“These earlier studies back our new findings from the North Savo region here in Finland. However, the question about the optimal dose of oral vitamin D in order to for it to have beneficial effects remains to be answered. Until we know more, national intake recommendations should be followed,” Professor of Dermatology and Allergology Ilkka Harvima of the University of Eastern Finland notes.

Source: University of Eastern Finland

Vitamin D is no Help for Statin Muscle Pains, Study Finds

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

Some clinicians have recommended vitamin D supplements to ease the muscle aches of patients taking a statin, but a new study published in the journal JAMA Cardiology shows the vitamin appears to have no substantial impact.

While non-randomised studies have reported vitamin D to be an effective treatment for statin-associated muscle symptoms, the new study, which is the first randomised clinical trial to look at the effect of vitamin D on statin-associated muscle symptoms, was large enough to rule out any important benefits.

In the randomised, double-blind trial, 2083 participants took either 2000 units of vitamin D supplements daily or a placebo. The study found participants in both categories were equally likely to develop muscle symptoms and discontinue statin therapy.

Over 4.8 years of follow-up, statin-related muscle pain was reported by 31% of the participants assigned vitamin D and 31% assigned a placebo.

“We had high hopes that vitamin D would be effective because in our clinic and across the country, statin-associated muscle symptoms were a major reason why so many patients stopped taking their statin medication,” said senior author Dr Neil Stone, professor at Northwestern University. “So, it was very disappointing that vitamin D failed a rigorous test. Nevertheless, it’s important to avoid using ineffective treatments and instead focus on research that can provide an answer.”

Statins and vitamin D supplements are two of the most commonly used medications in American adults. About 30 to 35 million Americans are prescribed statins, and about half of the population aged 60 and older take a vitamin D supplement.

“We took advantage of a large placebo-controlled randomised trial to test whether vitamin D would reduce statin-associated muscle symptoms and help patients keep taking their statins,” said lead study author Dr Mark Hlatky, a professor of health policy and cardiovascular medicine at Stanford. “The placebo control in the study was important because if people think vitamin D is supposed to reduce their muscle pains, they just might feel better while taking it, even if vitamin D has no specific effect.”

Trial was a sub study within a larger clinical trial

The 2083 patients were among the larger cohort of participants in the VITamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL), which randomised nearly 26 000 participants to double-blind vitamin D supplementation to determine whether it would prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer. This provided researchers a unique opportunity to test whether vitamin D reduces muscle symptoms among participants who initiated statins during the follow-up period of the larger VITAL trial. The mean age of the study participants was 67, and 51% were women.

“Randomised clinical trials are important because many very good ideas don’t work as well as we had hoped when they are put to the test,” Hlatky said. “Statistical associations do not prove a cause-and-effect relationship. Low levels of vitamin D are associated with many medical problems, but it turns out that giving people vitamin D does not generally fix those problems.”

For patients who report statin-associated muscle pains

Dr Stone noted that sometimes the secret for understanding patients who have difficulty with statins is analysing other medications they’re taking, determining whether or not they have associated metabolic or inflammatory conditions, counselling them on their ability to hydrate adequately and, importantly, discussing “pill anxiety.”

“For those who have difficulties with statins, a systematic appraisal by a physician with experience in dealing with these matters is still very important,” Stone said.

Source: Northwestern University

Study Links Vitamin D Deficiency to Premature Death

Photo by Julian Jagtenberg on Pexels

New research in the  Annals of Internal Medicine provides strong evidence that vitamin D deficiency is associated with premature death, prompting calls for people to follow healthy vitamin D level guidelines.

The study by the University of South Australia found that premature mortality increased in line with the severity of Vitamin D deficiency.

First author and UniSA PhD candidate, Josh Sutherland, says that while vitamin D has been connected with mortality, it has been challenging to establish causal effects.

“While severe vitamin D deficiency is rarer in Australia than elsewhere in the world, it can still affect those who have health vulnerabilities, the elderly, and those who do not acquire enough vitamin D from healthy sun exposure and dietary sources,” Sutherland says.

“Our study provides strong evidence for the connection between low levels of vitamin D and mortality, and this is the first study of its kind to also include respiratory disease related mortality as an outcome.

“We used a new genetic method to explore and affirm the non-linear relationships that we’ve seen in observational settings, and through this we’ve been able give strong evidence for the connection between low vitamin D status and premature death.

“Vitamin D deficiency has been connected with mortality, but as clinical trials have often failed to recruit people with low vitamin D levels – or have been prohibited from including vitamin deficient participants – it’s been challenging to establish causal relationships.”

The Mendelian randomisation study (an alternative to the gold standard of a randomised controlled trial) evaluated 307 601 records from the UK Biobank. Low levels of vitamin D were noted as less than <25 nmol/L with the average concentration found to be 45.2 nmol/L. Over a 14-year follow up period, researchers found that the risk for death significantly decreased with increased vitamin D concentrations, with the strongest effects seen among those with severe deficiencies.

Senior investigator Professor Elina Hyppönen says more research is now needed to establish effective public health strategies that can help achieve national guidelines and reduce the risk of premature death associated with low vitamin D levels.

“The take-home message here is simple – the key is in the prevention. It is not good enough to think about vitamin D deficiency when already facing life-challenging situations, when early action could make all the difference,” Prof Hyppönen says.

“It is very important to continue public health efforts to ensure the vulnerable and elderly maintain sufficient vitamin D levels throughout the year.”

Source: University of South Australia

Wealth Divide, not Vitamin D, Explains Differing MS Rates

Photo by Kyle Glenn on Unsplash

Differences in vitamin D exposure have been thought to explain why people who live farther from the equator are more likely to develop multiple sclerosis (MS). But countries farther from the equator are also more likely to be wealthier. A new analysis published in Neurology shows that the amount a country spends on health care may help explain this relationship between MS and latitude.

According to study author Deanna Saylor, MD, MHS, the results suggest that MS rates may be greatly underestimated in low-income countries with lower health care spending, which means that people have less access to neurologists who have the expertise to diagnose MS and MRI scanners that are needed to make the diagnosis.

Researchers analysed data from scientific studies and databases to determine current rates of MS in 203 countries and territories. Countries were then grouped into world regions and by income levels.

Rates of MS varied by region and income level. For example, in high-income countries an average of 46 of every 100 000 people had MS, compared to 10 people per 100 000 in low-income countries. Health care spending per capita was $2805 for high-income countries, compared to $45 in low-income countries.

For each location, researchers examined gross domestic product per capita, current health expenditure per capita, income levels, the availability of brain scans to diagnose MS, the number of neurologists per capita and universal health care. They also reviewed lifestyle factors such as obesity and tobacco use.

Once the researchers adjusted the data for other factors that could affect the risk of MS, such as age and sex, they found that health care spending and latitude were strongly associated with MS rates. The research showed that, with every increase of one standard deviation in health expenditure per capita, a country’s MS prevalence increased by 0.49. Alternatively, with every increase of one standard deviation in latitude, a country’s MS prevalence increased by 0.65.

Researchers also found that health care spending explained some, but not all, of the link between latitude and MS. After adjusting for other factors, the link between latitude and MS decreased by more than 20% when health care expenditure per capita was considered.

The availability of universal health care was associated with rates of MS in all world regions, except Southeast Asia, with universal health care tied to higher rates of MS.

In high-income countries, rates of MS were linked to most factors, including gross domestic product per capita, current health expenditure per capita, and the number of neurologists, but not tobacco use and obesity or the number of MRI units per capita. However, in low-income countries, there were no associations with any of these factors, which may be explained by a lack of significant variation in data from these countries, Saylor said.

According to Dr Saylor, the finding that current health expenditure per capita was very strongly linked with national rates of MS further supports the hypothesis that greater investment in health care leads to more robust reporting of rates of MS. She also said the minimal links between rates of MS and lifestyle factors such as tobacco use and obesity run counter to prior assumptions that lifestyle and consumption behaviours explain the large portions of regional differences in reported rates of MS.

Dr Saylor said strategies are urgently needed for the accurate assessment of the burden of MS in low-income countries, and these lower reported MS can obscure the need for training and funding regarding MS.

A limitation of the study is that different data sources may have collected information during different time periods or used different methods, which could affect the accuracy of estimates.

Source: American Academy of Neurology

Chronic Inflammation Link to Low Vitamin D Explains Some Controversies

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

New genetic research shows a direct link between low vitamin D levels and high levels of inflammation, providing an important biomarker to identify people at higher risk of or severity of chronic illnesses with an inflammatory component, such as type 2 diabetes. The findings, published in the International Journal of Epidemiology, also helps to settle some of the controversies surrounding the ‘sunshine vitamin’.

The study drew on genetic data for 294 970 participants in the UK Biobank, using Mendelian randomisation to show the association between vitamin D and C-reactive protein levels, an indicator of inflammation.

University of South Australia’s Dr Ang Zhou, the study’s lead researcher, said that the findings suggest that boosting vitamin D in people with a deficiency may reduce chronic inflammation.

“This study examined vitamin D and C-reactive proteins and found a one-way relationship between low levels of vitamin D and high levels of C-reactive protein, expressed as inflammation.

“Boosting vitamin D in people with deficiencies may reduce chronic inflammation, helping them avoid a number of related diseases.”

The study also raises the possibility that having adequate vitamin D concentrations may mitigate complications arising from obesity and reduce the risk or severity of chronic illnesses with an inflammatory component, such as CVDs, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases.

Senior investigator and Director of UniSA’s Australian Centre for Precision Health, Professor Elina Hyppönen, said that these results offer an explanation for some of the controversies in reported associations with vitamin D.

“We have repeatedly seen evidence for health benefits for increasing vitamin D concentrations in individuals with very low levels, while for others, there appears to be little to no benefit.” Prof Hyppönen said.

“These findings highlight the importance of avoiding clinical vitamin D deficiency, and provide further evidence for the wide-ranging effects of hormonal vitamin D.”

Source: University of South Australia

Vitamin D ‘Overdoses’ are Possible – and Dangerous

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

Doctors have warned that it it is possible to ‘overdose’ on Vitamin D, with harmful effects, after they treated a man hospitalised for excessive Vitamin D intake, a case which was detailed in BMJ Case Reports.

They further stress that ‘hypervitaminosis D’ is on the increase, and linked to a wide range of potentially serious health issues.

The case concerns a middle-aged man who was referred to hospital by his family GP after complaining of recurrent vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, leg cramps, tinnitus, dry mouth, increased thirst, diarrhoea, and weight loss (12.7 kg). 

The patient had been experiencing these symptoms had for almost three months, which had started around one month after he began an intensive vitamin supplement regimen on the advice of a nutritional therapist.

The man had had a number of health issues, including tuberculosis; a left vestibular schwannoma, resulting in deafness in that ear, hydrocephalus; bacterial meningitis; and chronic sinusitis.  

He had been taking high doses of more than 20 over the counter supplements every day containing: vitamin D 50 000mg – the daily requirement is 600mg or 400IU; vitamin K2 100mg (daily requirement 100–300 μg); vitamin C, vitamin B9 (folate) 1000mg (daily requirement 400 μg); vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B6, omega-3 2000mg twice daily (daily requirement 200–500 mg), plus several other vitamin, mineral, nutrient, and probiotic supplements.

Once he developed symptoms, he stopped taking his daily supplement cocktail, but his symptoms didn’t go away.

Blood test results from his family doctor revealed that he had very high levels of calcium and slightly raised levels of magnesium. And his vitamin D level was seven times over the level required for sufficiency.

The tests also indicated acute kidney injury. The results of various x-rays and scans to check for cancer were normal. 

The man was hospitalised for 8 days, during which time he was given intravenous fluids to flush out his system and treated with bisphosphonates – ordinarily used to treat osteoporosis or hypercalcaemia.

Two months post-discharge, his calcium level had returned to normal, but his vitamin D level was still abnormally high.

“Globally, there is a growing trend of hypervitaminosis D, a clinical condition characterised by elevated serum vitamin D3 levels,” with women, children and surgical patients most likely to be affected, the authors noted. 

Recommended vitamin D levels can be obtained through diet, sunlight exposure to sunlight, and supplements.

“Given its slow turnover (half-life of approximately two months), during which vitamin D toxicity develops, symptoms can last for several weeks,” the authors warned.

Hypervitaminosis D has many and varied symptoms, they point out, and are mostly caused by hypercalcaemia. They include drowsiness, confusion, apathy, psychosis, depression, stupor, coma, anorexia, abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation, peptic ulcers, pancreatitis, hypertension, abnormal heart rhythm, and kidney abnormalities, including renal failure. 

Other associated features, such as keratopathy (inflammatory eye disease), joint stiffness (arthralgia), and hearing loss or deafness, have also been reported, they add.

This is just one case, and while hypervitaminosis D is on the rise, it is still relatively uncommon, the authors cautioned.

Nevertheless, complementary therapy, including the use of dietary supplements, is popular, and people may not realise that it’s possible to overdose on vitamin D, or the potential consequences of doing so, they say.

“This case report further highlights the potential toxicity of supplements that are largely considered safe until taken in unsafe amounts or in unsafe combinations,” they concluded.

Source: The BMJ

Vitamin D Doesn’t Prevent the Development of Type 2 Diabetes

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

Daily vitamin D supplements do not seem to prevent the development of type 2 diabetes in people already at high risk of the condition, according to a Japanese trial published by The BMJ.

While no clinically meaningful effect was seen in high risk adults, the results hinted that there may be a benefit for people with insufficient insulin secretion.

Type 2 diabetes affects around 480 million people worldwide, and is predicted to increase to 700 million by 2045. Another half a billion people have impaired glucose tolerance or pre-diabetes (higher than normal blood sugar levels that, if left untreated, can develop into type 2 diabetes).

Weight loss and exercise can lower the risk of progression to type 2 diabetes, but are difficult to sustain, so new strategies are needed to tackle the problem.

An association between vitamin D deficiency and an increased risk of future diabetes has been shown in some studies, but trials of vitamin D supplements for preventing type 2 diabetes show inconsistent results.

To address this knowledge gap, researchers therefore set out to assess whether eldecalcitol (an active form of vitamin D used to treat osteoporosis in Japan) could reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes among people with impaired glucose tolerance.

The study involved 1256 Japanese adults with impaired glucose tolerance with an average age of 61 years; 46% were women, and 59% had a family history of type 2 diabetes.

Participants were randomly assigned to receive either a standard daily dose of eldecalcitol (630 participants) or placebo (626 participants) and were assessed for diabetes every three months over a three-year follow-up period.

During this period, the researchers found no meaningful differences between groups in those who developed diabetes (12.5% in the eldecalcitol group and 14% in the placebo group) or whose blood sugar levels returned to normal (23% in the eldecalcitol group and 20% in the placebo group).

However, after adjusting for 11 potentially influential factors, including age, sex, blood pressure, body mass index, and family history of diabetes, the results suggested that eldecalcitol might prevent type 2 diabetes in pre-diabetic patients with insufficient insulin secretion. But this finding remains unclear and the researchers say further work is needed before any firm conclusions can be made.

They did, however, find a significant increase in both lower back and hip bone mineral densities among those taking eldecalcitol compared with placebo.

No significant difference in serious adverse events was seen between the two groups.

The researchers acknowledge some uncertainties, such as whether the dose of eldecalcitol used was appropriate for preventing diabetes, and whether the results apply to all ethnicities. Nevertheless, this was a large trial with regular follow-up and high adherence to treatment, suggesting that the findings are robust.

As such, they say: “Although treatment with eldecalcitol did not significantly reduce the incidence of diabetes among people with pre-diabetes, the results suggested the potential for a beneficial effect of eldecalcitol on people with insufficient insulin secretion.” And they call for further research to determine whether vitamin D is beneficial to people with pre-diabetes.

This new trial was well conducted and results are consistent with two other recent trials, said Tatiana Christides at Queen Mary University of London in a linked editorial.

However, several questions remain, she writes, including whether vitamin D supplementation may be more effective for particular populations, and whether longer duration of treatment or younger age at initiation might be more beneficial.

Until further data are available from high quality randomized trials, she suggests healthcare professionals “should continue to discuss with patients the musculoskeletal health benefits of vitamin D and support them to achieve and maintain lifestyle changes that, although challenging to sustain, are known to decrease development of type 2 diabetes.”

Source: News-Medical.Net

Study Finds That Vitamin D3 Has a Greater Health Benefit Than D2

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

A new study has found that vitamin D2 and D3 have significant differences in effect, with vitamin D2 having a questionable impact on human health. However, the study found that vitamin D3 (the ‘sunshine vitamin’) could balance people’s immune systems and help strengthen defences against viral infections.

In a study published in Frontiers in Immunology, researchers investigated the impact of vitamin D supplements, D2 and D3, taken daily over a 12-week period on the activity of genes in people’s blood.

Contrary to widely held views, the research team discovered that both types of vitamin D did not have the same effect, rather they found evidence that vitamin D3 influences the immune system in a way that could fortify the body against viral and bacterial diseases.

Professor Colin Smith, lead-author of the study from the University of Surrey, who began this work while at the University of Brighton, said: “We have shown that vitamin D3 appears to stimulate the type I interferon signalling system in the body – a key part of the immune system that provides a first line of defence against bacteria and viruses. Thus, a healthy vitamin D3 status may help prevent viruses and bacteria from gaining a foothold in the body.

“Our study suggests that it is important that people take a vitamin D3 supplement, or suitably fortified foods, especially in the winter months.”

Few natural foods contain Vitamin D, although some such as bread and yoghurt may be fortified with it. Vitamin D3 is produced naturally in the skin from exposure to sunlight or artificial ultraviolet UVB light, while some plants and fungi produce vitamin D2.

Many people have insufficient levels of vitamin D3 because they live in locations where sunlight is limited in the winter, like the UK. Sunlight exposure has also been limited by the COVID pandemic as people spend more time in their homes.

Professor Susan Lanham-New, co-author of the study and Head of the Department of Nutritional Sciences at the University of Surrey, said: “While we found that vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 do not have the same effect on gene activity within humans, the lack of impact we found when looking at vitamin D2 means that a larger study is urgently required to clarify the differences in the effects. However, these results show that vitamin D3 should be the favoured form for fortified foods and supplements.”

Source: University of Surrey

Vitamin D Supplements Reduce Autoimmune Disease Risk

A five year-long randomised, placebo-controlled study found that in older adults taking vitamin D supplements, alone or with omega-3 fatty acids, the risk of developing autoimmune disease was reduced.

Autoimmune diseases (AD) such as rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune thyroid disease and psoriasis, are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality as people age. Few effective treatments are available for AD, but some research has hinted that supplements, including vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids, could have beneficial effects.

In a new study published in the BMJ, investigators from Brigham and Women’s Hospital evaluated whether taking vitamin D and/or omega fatty acid supplements could affect rates of AD. The large-scale vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL), a randomised study which followed participants for approximately five years. Taking vitamin D, or vitamin D and omega-3 fatty acids had a significantly lower rate of AD than placebo.

“It is exciting to have these new and positive results for non-toxic vitamins and supplements preventing potentially highly morbid diseases,” said senior author Karen Costenbader, MD, MPH. “This is the first direct evidence we have that daily supplementation may reduce AD incidence, and what looks like a more pronounced effect after two years of supplementation for vitamin D.”

“Now, when my patients, colleagues, or friends ask me which vitamins or supplements I’d recommend they take to reduce risk of autoimmune disease, I have new evidence-based recommendations for women aged 55 years and older and men 50 years and older,” said Dr Costenbader. “I suggest vitamin D 2000 IU a day and marine omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil), 1000 mg a day – the doses used in VITAL.”

VITAL included 25 871 participants, with men aged 50 and older and women aged 55 and older, conducted to investigate whether taking vitamin D3 and/or omega-3 supplements could reduce the risk for developing cancer, heart disease and stroke in people who do not have a prior history of these illnesses. Prior to the launch of VITAL, investigators determined that they would also look at rates of AD among participants, as part of an ancillary study.

Participants answered questionnaires about new diagnoses of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, autoimmune thyroid disease, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease, with space to write in all other new onset ADs. Medical records were reviewed to confirm reported diagnoses.

“Autoimmune diseases are common in older adults and negatively affect health and life expectancy. Until now, we have had no proven way of preventing them, and now, for the first time, we do,” said first author Jill Hahn, ScD, post-doctoral fellow at the Brigham.

Among patients randomised to vitamin D, 123 participants in the treatment group and 155 in the placebo group were diagnosed with confirmed AD (22 percent reduction). Among those in the fatty acid arm, confirmed AD occurred in 130 participants in the treatment group and 148 in the placebo group. Omega-3 fatty acids alone did not significantly lower incidence of AD, but there was some evidence of a decrease over long periods.

Source: EurekAlert!