Tag: USA

Black Barbershops with Pharmacist-led Care can Combat Hypertension

Black and white image of a black man getting a haircut at a barbershop. Credit: BariKive from Pexels.

Black barbershops with pharmacist-led blood pressure (BP) care for their clients, have been shown to be cost effective, with the high initial costs offsetting reduced cardiovascular events later in life.

The study cost simulations were based on the original  Los Angeles Barbershop Blood Pressure Study (LABBPS). In that study, intervention consisted of a trial with men being assigned either to barbershops where barbers encouraged patrons to meet with pharmacists who prescribed drug therapy under an agreement with the participants’ doctors, with the control group being men assigned to barbershops where the barbers only promoted lifestyle modification and physician visits. This intervention resulted in a mean BP drop of 27.0mmHg compared to the control group which fell by 9.3mmHg.

In a 1-year intervention based on costs for the LABBPS, on average, $2356 more per participant than the controls and was associated with a gain of 0.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 10-year horizon, according to Brandon Bellows, PharmD, MS, of Columbia University in New York City, and colleagues.

Thus, in computer simulations,  the LABBPS intervention was associated with 10-year projected total healthcare costs averaging $42 717 per QALY gained, reported the researchers.

“One concern raised as a potential barrier to widespread LABBPS implementation is the specialty training of clinical pharmacists. In this analysis, the cost of specialty training and certification was included; the results suggest that long-term health benefits and avoided healthcare costs of the LABBPS offset these upfront training costs,” the researchers wrote.

The team reported that the cost effectiveness of the intervention could be increased under various various scenarios:

  • Only using generic drugs: $17 162 per QALY gained
  • Shortening intervention to 26 weeks: $18 300 per QALY gained
  • Implementing optimal savings from less time spent on intervention tasks, lower equipment costs, only using generics, and no participant incentive costs: intervention becomes dominant (both less expensive and more effective than control)

However, if pharmacists were less likely to intensify antihypertensive medications when systolic BP was ≥ 150 mm Hg, or if pharmacists took longer to get to the barbershops, the cost of the LABBPS intervention would exceed $50 000 per QALY gained.

“Hypertension care delivered by clinical pharmacists in Black barbershops is a highly cost-effective way to improve BP control in Black men,” the authors concluded.  

The LABBPS has received praise for demonstrating that Black men with uncontrolled hypertension had better BP control after 6 months with barbershop visits by specialty pharmacists than with regular physician visits. Extending the intervention to 1 year did not change the results.

Researchers previously reported that a telemedicine component could bring down cost and maintain efficiency of the LABBPS program.

“Hypertension prevalence remains higher among non-Hispanic Black men than in any other racial or ethnic group in the US. Hypertension awareness and treatment have plateaued in the US since 2010, and Black men continue to have worse BP control and higher hypertension-related cardiovascular disease mortality rates compared with other groups,” the investigators wrote.

The researchers assumed that after the one-year intervention period, processes of hypertension care management returned to standard care, which was a major limitation of the study.

“These findings may also be somewhat limited in scope as a healthcare sector perspective was used, which only considers direct healthcare costs, rather than a societal perspective, which may include indirect costs such as improvements in productivity,” noted Bellows and co-authors. “Finally, cost-effectiveness estimated for the LABBPS may not be generalizable to other U.S. communities, as it was specific to Los Angeles County and was driven in part by the high underlying risk of cardiovascular disease in Black men.”

Source: MedPage Today

Journal information: Bryant KB, et al “Cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment by pharmacists in black barbershops” Circulation 2021; DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051683.

FDA and CDC Justify J&J Vaccine Pause

FDA and CDC officials recommended pausing administration of the Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine “out of an abundance of caution,” and mainly for the benefit of clinicians to respond to associated serious events.

This comes after six cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) combined with thrombocytopenia were reported in the US, all among women ages 18-48. With approximately 6.8 million doses administered in the U.S., it suggests a one-in-a-million risk. 

J&J has halted distribution of its vaccine in Europe, reportedly taking officials there by surprise. South Africa has also paused the vaccine rollout.

At a media briefing, when asked whether pausing administration of the vaccine was an “overreaction,” Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, MD, said the aim was to provide “time for the healthcare community to learn what they needed about how to diagnose, treat, and report” such events.

FDA’s director for the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Peter Marks, MD, PhD, noted that the condition involves a rare blood clot for which heparin or related anticoagulants is not the standard treatment.

“The issue with these types of blood clots is if one administered standard treatment, one can actually cause tremendous harm or the outcome can be fatal,” he said. “One needs to make sure providers are aware if they see people with low blood platelets or blood clots, to inquire about recent vaccination and act accordingly.”

The background rate of CVST is 2-14 per million in the setting of a normal platelet count, but thrombocytopenia together with abnormal clotting makes it a “pattern.” CVST symptoms also include severe headache, abdominal pain, leg pain, and shortness of breath.

Marks noted that vaccination-related headaches tend to resolve within a few days, whereas CVST symptoms could manifest over a week post-vaccination, and closer to a patient presenting to the emergency department with severe headache. No such rare events have been seen more than 3 weeks post-vaccination.

Dr Marks also said that this pause is a recommendation but does not prevent healthcare providers from providing the J&J vaccine to their patients should benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks.

“We’re not going to stop a provider from administering a vaccine,” he added. “The benefit/risk will be beneficial overall to that individual in a large majority of cases.”

Dr Marks said that while they don’t have a “definitive cause” for the adverse reactions, data from AstraZeneca on similar events in Europe, it is likely a “similar mechanism” with the J&J vaccine. An autoantibody against platelet factor 4 has recently been identified as the trigger for the reaction.
“The immune response occurs rarely after some people receive the vaccine, and that immune response leads to the activation of platelets and extremely rare blood clots,” he said.

However, Marks stopped short of calling it a “class effect,” meaning it was related to the viral vector vaccine itself. He said he wasn’t ready to make a “broad statement yet,” but “obviously it’s from the same general class of viral vectors.”

The AstraZeneca, J&J and Sputnik V vaccines all use adenovirus vectors to deliver antigens. The rate CVST for AstraZeneca was estimated by European officials to be about 5 per million doses. Though Sputnik V has no confirmed CVST cases, a recent report suggests a possibility.

Besides these, the Ebola vaccines are the only other ones to use adenovirus vectors.
Woodcock said that all US cases were in women of reproductive age, with one death and one hospitalisation, but Marks said it was not clear there was any association with hormonal contraception, which also carries a small thrombosis risk. The cases did not have any preexisting conditions which could have explained the events.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) noted there is no “clear phenotype” for women who may experience this complication.

“Until there is a better understanding of the frequency and impact of this finding, it will be important to encourage pregnant and postpartum women who wish to be vaccinated to receive the mRNA vaccines: Pfizer or Moderna,” said Christopher Zahn, MD, vice president for practice activities at ACOG, in a statement.

“If venous thrombosis is noted in the setting of thrombocytopenia, treatment includes intravenous immunoglobulin and other supportive care,” Dr Zahn added.

Source: MedPage Today

US Hits Pause on J&J Vaccine

Reacting to reports of potentially dangerous blood clots, the US is recommending a “pause” in immunisations with the single-dose Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine in order to perform investigations.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration said in a joint statement that they were investigating blood clots in six women that occurred 6 to 13 days after vaccination. The clots, seen in the sinuses of the brain, also had lowered platelet counts. This renders the use of heparin, the standard treatment for blood clots, potentially dangerous.

Out of 183.5 million vaccine doses administered in the US, over 6.8 million doses are the J&J vaccine — the overwhelming majority without serious side effects. The rest is made up by the two other authorised vaccines, from Moderna and Pfizer.

Use of the J&J shot will be paused in US federal distribution channels, including mass vaccination sites, with states and other providers being expected to follow.

CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will meet Wednesday to discuss the cases and the FDA has also launched an investigation into the cause of the clots and low platelet counts.

“Until that process is complete, we are recommending a pause in the use of this vaccine out of an abundance of caution,” Dr Anne Schuchat, principal deputy director of the CDC, and Dr Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in a joint statement.

They recommend that people who received the J&J vaccine and are experiencing severe headache, abdominal pain, leg pain, or shortness of breath within three weeks after receiving the jab contact their health care provider.

Officials say that they want to bring healthcare providers up to speed on the blood clot’s “unique treatment” .

Meanwhile, Johnson & Johnson had said it was aware of the blood clot reports, but no association with its vaccine had been established.

“We are aware that thromboembolic events including those with thrombocytopenia have been reported with Covid-19 vaccines,” the company said in a statement. “At present, no clear causal relationship has been established between these rare events and the Janssen Covid-19 vaccine.”

In late February, the FDA  granted emergency use authorisation to the J&J vaccine, with hopes that its single-dose and relatively simple storage requirements would speed vaccinations across the country. However, only a fraction of the vaccines administered in the US are the J&J shot. The company has been beset by production delays and manufacturing errors at a contractor’s plant. 

The pharmaceutical company took over the facility to ramp up production to make good on its promise to the US government of 100 million doses by the end of May. Only about 9 million of the company’s doses have been delivered to states and are awaiting administration, according to CDC data.
Previously, concern over the blood clots was confined to AstraZeneca’s vaccine, with European regulators saying last week they found a possible link between the shots and an exceedingly rare type of blood clot presenting with low platelets, a situation found more commonly in young people.

Nevertheless, the European Medicines Agency emphasised that the benefits for the vaccine outweigh the risks. Despite this, several countries imposed restrictions on vaccine eligibility and some such as Britain and Greece recommending that people under a certain age be offered alternatives.

Unlike the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines which use mRNA to train the immune system to recognise the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the J&J and AstraZeneca vaccines use an adapted adenovirus to introduce the spike protein antigen into the body. Adenoviruses were first identified in the 1950s as a family of similar disease-causing viruses. AstraZeneca’s vaccine uses a chimpanzee adenovirus while the J&J uses a human one.

Source: Medical Xpress

High Melanoma Rates Reported in Sunny US State

A study reports that melanoma mortality among people in Utah, a sunny, high-altitude state, outpaced that of the rest of the country over 1975 to 2013.

This runs counter to the falling melanoma death rates in recent years in both Utah and the United States, a trend likely due to improved treatments such as immunotherapy. It is still the deadliest skin cancer type, with melanoma diagnosis rate in Utah the highest in the US.

Motivation for the research was recent evidence showing that for most of the 1990s and 2000s, even as melanoma mortality in the United States remained constant, incidence increased six-fold. This increasing incidence without accompanying mortality rise indicates overdiagnosis, ie false cancer diagnoses. 

In the case of melanoma, overdiagnosis may result from increased scrutiny, where increasing numbers of biopsies may find a benign lesion that would have gone undetected.

Since Utah has the highest melanoma incidence, a team from Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) at the University of Utah set out to evaluate the state’s melanoma diagnosis and death rate data. Biostatistician Kim Herget analysed data from the Utah Cancer Registry, a National Cancer Institute Survival, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and the researchers found that in contrast to the rest of the country, melanoma mortality in Utah rose 0.8% per year from 1975 to 2013. Even though Utah’s melanoma death rates have been falling in recent years, they are still higher than the rest of the country.

“Although we agree that overdiagnosis of melanoma is a growing problem, the sustained increase in melanoma mortality in Utah suggests that at least some fraction of the increasing incidence is real and cannot be attributed solely to overdiagnosis,” said Doug Grossman, MD, PhD, who co-leads the HCI melanoma and skin cancer centre at HCI and serves as professor of dermatology at the University of Utah. “Our research underscores an increased risk for Utahns, and so we must remain vigilant about melanoma. For doctors, this means regular conversations with patients about their skin health and family history. For patients, this means practicing sun-safe behaviors like diligent sunscreen use, wearing sun-protective clothing, and monitoring their skin at home on a monthly basis to reduce risk of skin cancer and optimize early detection.”

Future studies should determine whether this trend in people living in Utah results from increased ultraviolet exposure in a mostly fair-skinned population living in a sunny, high-altitude climate or if it is associated with other factors such as environment or genetics. Melanomas are also found at higher rates in immune compromised patients.

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: Doug Grossman et al, The Rapid Rise in Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnoses N Engl J Med 2021; 384:e54 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2101980

Osteoporosis Rates are Increasing in US Women

Osteoporosis is present in Almost one in five American women aged 50 and older, according to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and the osteoporosis rates are increasing.

Neda Sarafrazi, PhD, of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in Hyattsville, Maryland, and colleagues reported the findings in an NCHS Data Brief.

Osteoporosis is defined as bone mineral density (BMD) value at least 2.5 standard deviations below young-adult average at the femoral neck or lumbar spine was present, and was measured in NHANES with dual x-ray absorption dosimetry.

In cross-sectional survey data from 2017-2018, 19.6% of women 50 and older had osteoporosis at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, or both. In men, the age-adjusted prevalence was only 4.4% of men 50 and older.

All in all, osteoporosis was present in 12.6% of all American adults 50 and older, which was defined as a bone mineral density (BMD) value at least 2.5 standard deviations below the average for young adults at the femoral neck or lumbar spine.

Osteoporosis, as to be expected, was far more common among older adults, affecting 17.7% of all men and women 65 and older, versus 8.4% of those ages 50-64. In women ages 65 and older, the prevalence was 27% and at ages 50-64 was 13.1%. In men, prevalence values were 5.7% in those 65 and older and 3.3% for those 50-64.

Sarafrazi’s team found that osteoporosis had become slightly more prevalent over the years. In 2007-2008, 9.4% of Americans 50 and older had osteoporosis. While rates remained steady throughout for men, a big uptick of 5 percentage points was seen for women.

“Monitoring the prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass may inform public health programs that focus on reducing or preventing osteoporosis and its consequences,” suggested Sarafrazi’s group. “Healthy People 2020 has a goal of 5.3% or less for the prevalence of osteoporosis at the femur neck for adults aged 50 and over.”

“In the United States, the prevalence of osteoporosis among adults aged 50 and over at the femur neck only was 6.3% and has not met the 2020 goal,” they stressed.

The data also revealed high rates of low bone mass, a precursor of osteoporosis, defined as BMD of 1 to 2.5 standard deviations below the average for young adults.

Among all adults ages 50 and older, 43.1% had low bone mass at the femoral neck, lumbar spine, or both. Among women, prevalence was 51.5% and among men 33.5% .

The overall rate reached 47.5% in those 65 and older. However, older age seemed to be less of a factor for women, with almost no difference between the 50-64 and 65-plus age groups.

However, the prevalence rates of low bone mass in both sexes held steady during the decade between 2007-2008 and 2017-2018.  

Source: MedPage Today

Journal information: Sarafrazi N, et al “Osteoporosis or low bone mass in older adults: United States, 2017–2018” NCHS Data Brief 2021; No 405.

CDC Director Fears ‘Impending Doom’ as COVID Cases Rise Again

Rochelle Walensky, MD, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Director, says that she fears “impending doom” as COVID deaths in the US edge upwards as people increasingly ignore health restrictions and start to travel.

Beginning her usual COVID status update,  Dr Walensky spoke as she often did of “concerning trends in the data.”

Dr Walensky spoke about the country surpassing 30 million COVID cases; of a 10% increase in the 7-day average of COVID-19 cases over the past week, to slightly below 60 000 cases; and of an uptick in hospitalisations, from a 7-day average of around 4600 per day to around 4800 per day.

“And deaths, which typically lag behind cases and hospitalizations, have now started to rise,” she said, pointing to a nearly 3% increase to a 7-day average of “approximately 1000 deaths per day.”

“I’m going to pause here,” she said. “I’m going to lose the script and I’m going to reflect on the recurring feeling I have of impending doom.”  

At the start of her tenure, Walensky said she had pledged to always tell the truth even if it wasn’t something Americans wanted to hear.

“We have so much to look forward to, so much promise and potential of where we are, and so much reason for hope. But right now I’m scared,” she said.

She recalled her time caring for COVID patients, saying: “I know what it’s like as a physician to stand in that patient room, gowned, gloved, masked, shielded and to be the last person to touch someone else’s loved one because their loved one couldn’t be there.

“I know what it’s like when you’re the physician, when you’re the healthcare provider, and you’re worried that you don’t have the resources to care for the patients in front of you.” 

She also recalled “that feeling of nausea, when you read the ‘Crisis Standards of Care’ and you wonder whether there are going to be enough ventilators to go around and who’s going to make that choice.”

She emphasised that she was speaking “not only as your CDC director, but as a wife, as a mother, as a daughter, to ask you to just please hold on a little while longer.”

She sympathised, she said, with those “wanting to be done” with the pandemic.

“We are just almost there, but not quite yet. And so I’m asking you to just hold on a little longer, to get vaccinated when you can. So that all of those people that we all love will still be here when this pandemic ends.”

Dr Walensky warned that the US pandemic trajectory was looking dangerously similar to that of European countries like Germany that were still struggling to contain the virus.

“We are not powerless. We can change this trajectory of the pandemic,” she said.

“But it will take all of us recommitting to following the public health prevention strategies consistently while we work to get the American public vaccinated.”

According to the New York Times’  COVID vaccination tracker, 146 million vaccinations have been administered in the US to date, with 2.76 million doses being given daily. At this rate, 70% of the adult population will have been vaccinated by June 16.

She urged community and religious leaders, officials, and other influencers to help support the vaccination programme.

“For the health of our country, we must work together now to prevent a fourth surge.”

Source: MedPage Today

‘3 Feet’ Social Distancing Rule Being Considered by US

Data that suggest a ‘three feet’ social distancing rule is under consideration, according to Dr Anthony Fauci, the foremost infectious disease expert in the US.

To control COVID transmission, the World Health Organization recommends social distancing at one metre (3.3 feet), and a three feet distance used in some schools in the US is based on this. When asked about the new report on a CNN programme on Sunday, Dr Fauci agreed the data appeared to indicate that three feet is sufficient.   

While the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention do not currently recommend a rule change, Dr Fauci said that the report is being reviewed by them.

“What the CDC wants to do is accumulate data, and when data shows ability to be three feet, they will act accordingly,” Dr Fauci said, adding that its director, Dr Rochelle Walensky, was aware of the new research, with the CDC also conducting its own studies. “I don’t want to get ahead of official guidelines,” he added.

The researchers, who controlled for community rates of coronavirus in their analysis, concluded that lower physical distancing policies can safely be adopted in school settings, as long as other measures like universal masking are in place.

The study compared COVID infection rates among staff and students across 242 school districts in the state of Massachusetts, and found that schools with a three feet social distancing rule did not have a significantly different rate of transmission compared to those with the standard six feet rule.

However, there is a limitation to COVID monitoring in school-aged populations. While children may be infected as readily from COVID, they are less likely to develop illness from COVID, and so they are also less likely to get tested.

Source: NY Times

Restaurants and Not Wearing Masks Increases COVID Transmission, CDC Warns

Fully opening restaurants and not having mask rules in place and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) warned.

“This report is a critical reminder that with the current levels of COVID-19 in communities and the continued spread of more transmissible virus variants, which have now been detected in 48 states, strictly following prevention measures remains essential for putting an end to this pandemic,” said CDC director Rochelle Walensky, MD, at a White House COVID briefing on Friday. “It also serves as a warning about prematurely lifting these prevention measures.”

Dr Walensky’s comments may have been made with states such as Texas and Mississippi in mind, with their governors announcing that they were dropping mask mandates and allowing full reopening, including businesses such as restaurants at full capacity. Some restaurants that are still enforcing 

Research has already shown that in-person dining and lack of mask regulations contribute to the spread of COVID cases. Taking data from state and local health department websites, COVID cases and deaths were analysed at county level The team compared data from post-implementation time points, ranging from 1-20 days to 81-100 days, to pre-implementation periods.

The researchers also attempted to control for other factors, such as restaurant closures during the mask mandates, mask mandates in the restaurant reopening models, stay-at-home orders, and bans on gatherings of more than 10 people.

Of the three-quarters of surveyed counties with mask mandates, the researchers found that within 1-20 days of mask mandates, there was a 0.5 percentage point drop in COVID case growth rates. Case and death growth rates saw almost a 2.0 percentage point decline 81-100 days after mask mandates came into effect.

Conversely, states allowed restaurants to re-open for in-person dining. While the impact was not immediate, COVID case growth rates increased 1.1 percentage points 81-100 days later. However, counties allowing in-person dining were associated with 2.2 percentage point increases at days 61-80 and a 3.0 percentage point increase at days 81-100 after restrictions were lifted.

The researchers speculated about the cause, such as restaurants potentially delaying reopening even after they were allowed to do so, and that patrons might have been more cautious during initial reopenings but more likely to dine at restaurants as time passed.

Source: MedPage Today

US Rollout of Johnson & Johnson Vaccine As It Gets FDA Approval

Johnson & Johnson’s single shot COVID vaccine is set to roll out in the US after its approval, but concerns linger as to the public’s perception of its relative effectiveness.

The vaccine received an emergency use authorisation (EUA) on Saturday from the FDA, and received approval from the CDC the following day. On Sunday night White House officials stated that distribution of 3.9 million doses of the J&J vaccine would begin immediately, with J&J expecting to deliver some 16 million more doses by the end of March. These vaccines will be allocated proportionally, as per the procedure for Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines.

At a Saturday media briefing, acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, MD, reiterated issues raised by the FDA advisory committee, that the J&J product’s lower efficacy number (70% vs 95%) may cause people to think it is less effective than the alternatives. She said that wasn’t necessarily so, urging Americans to “take the vaccine they are able to access.”

“All these vaccines meet our standards for effectiveness. They were not studied in head-to-head trials, so [they’re] difficult to compare … due to differences in development programs,” she said. (Preventing moderate-to-severe COVID illness was the J&J endpoint, whereas in the Pfizer and Moderna studies the endpoint was all symptomatic COVID.)

“We need to be clear on our messaging regarding comparisons with other vaccines,” said Jason Goldman, MD, of the American College of Physicians. “As a primary care physician, many of us are eager to vaccinate” patients and this vaccine will be “helpful in achieving that goal.”

Macaya Douoguih, MD, of J&J’s Janssen unit where the vaccine was developed, talked about the potential advantages of a one-dose vaccine, referencing the company experience with the Ebola vaccine

“For an outbreak setting, a single dose has a tremendous advantage in terms of being able to rapidly roll out mass vaccination” without the complexity of following up for a second dose, she said.

Dr Douoguih addressed the company’s planned two-dose study, saying that while a two-dose regimen might be “more immunogenic and lead to durable efficacy,” she thought there was room for both options. The two-dose option would be preferable in an ‘everyday’ COVID setting. The company was trying to enroll 16-17 year olds for additional data in a study starting next week, Dr Douoguih said.

The CDC researchers discussed preliminary data on asymptomatic infection, which assessed seroconversion between days 29 and 71. Those data showed vaccine efficacy against seroconversion was 74% (95% CI 48%-87%), but the CDC urged caution as the data was only preliminary.

“Our level of confidence in asymptomatic infection is tempered by low numbers and that is important for us to remember,” said Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices committee member Sarah Long, MD, of Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia. “I appreciate the workgroup concluding the confidence is not that high.”

Source: MedPage Today

Dialysis Crisis from Texas Ice Storm

Widespread power outages and water supply issues have created a dialysis crisis in Texas, following an onslaught of snow, ice, and sub-freezing temperatures.

“To say we’re stressed is an understatement. Almost all outpatient dialysis units closed due to power outages. Trying desperately to do as many as we can inpatient. To make matters worse some of our hospitals lost water today (so no HD [haemodialysis]). Truly a nightmare,” tweeted Tessa Novick, MD, a nephrologist at the University of Texas at Austin.
Half of Texas’ dialysis centres, serving 54 000 people, were unable to operate in the wake of the severe ice storm that has caused widespread damage in Texas and other parts of the US. Some patients had been without dialysis for four to five days, causing risk of potentially life-threatening potassium and fluid problems.

The large storm system, unofficially called Winter Storm Uri, dropped snow and ice over Texas on February 14 and 15, resulting in widespread power failures as lines were damaged. Few clinics have generators. Water pipes have also frozen, and this is a further problem as dialysis needs clean water to prepare concentrates and dialysate, and to reprocess the machines for following patients.

Fresenius Kidney Care said that around half of its Houston area centres have been impacted by a lack of water, “with the other centres either fully operational or operating on generators.” Water truck deliveries will allow other centres to reopen.

Tiffany Jones-Smith, CEO of the Texas Kidney Foundation, pointed out that there were some bright spots, such as eight clinics in San Antonio that brought water in and have been day and night to dialyse patients from any closed clinic regardless of affiliation. Other clinics were following suit, and Jones-Smith said patients were being given Uber and Lyft coupons to reach their dialysis centres. “We’re just kind of banding together and figuring out what needs to be done,” she said.

Looking ahead to when the crisis had cleared, Jones-Smith said, “We can’t let this go, because we need to be prepared for the next time, not just reacting to chaos, which is what we’re doing right now. … There’s no getting around we’ve had an epic failure.”

Climate change is predicted to increase the frequency and severity of such extreme events in the future, requiring better preparation.

Source: MedPage Today