Tag: Spotlight

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

In-depth: What Government is Doing to Reduce Medicines Stockouts

On By ModernMedia
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

By Jesse Copelyn for Spotlight

Over the last decade, the National Health Department has rolled out a range of electronic surveillance systems to monitor medicine stocks throughout the country’s healthcare facilities. Many healthcare workers feel the new systems are making a positive impact, but stockouts persist due to a host of ongoing supply challenges.

“My problem with the clinic is that I get there as early as 7am and leave around 3pm. I [went] to the clinic to collect my hypertension tablets. We get into a long queue only to be told that they don’t have hypertension tablets. Not having my tablets poses a danger to my life. I get dizzy and I am unable to work. I [asked] for the day off from work to come [that day], then [had] to ask for another day off to do the same thing,” says a Klerksdorp resident interviewed by the community healthcare monitoring group Ritshidze.

According to a recent report from Ritshidze, between May and June this year, there were over 400 unique medicine stockouts reported in just 72 healthcare facilities across the North West province. In roughly the same period, doctors in the Eastern Cape reportedly struggled to treat patients with bone marrow cancer due to province-wide shortages of crucial chemotherapy drugs. And in August, Africa’s largest hospital, Chris Hani Baragwanath, allegedly faced a stockout of adrenaline for two days.

Though the problem is not exclusive to South Africa, recent news about medicine stockouts paints a gloomy picture of the country’s capacity to manage essential medicines. But the National Health Department’s Khadija Jamaloodien says these reports shouldn’t overshadow a broader trend. Instead, she argues that the health department has made significant strides to improve medicines availability through a series of national drug stock surveillance programs. (You can see Jamaloodien’s full and very informative response here.)

But what are these systems, and are they as effective as the health department claims?

Health department ramps up surveillance

In November 2013 a nation-wide survey of hospitals and clinics conducted by the Stop Stockouts Project found that more than 1 in 5 had experienced stockouts of ARVs or TB drugs in the previous three months alone. The National Health Department appeared to have little understanding of the severity of the problem – in April, 2014 they claimed that in the last 12 months there had been only a few stockouts of ARVs, restricted to two provinces.

As media attention on shortages grew, the department began to prioritise the issue and developed an extensive surveillance system to better monitor medicine levels throughout the country’s public healthcare facilities. One key program is RxSolution, a computer-based stock management system that pharmacists and nurses use to record the quantities of drugs that have been ordered, received and dispensed at their facilities.

The software was rolled out incrementally at hospitals from 2014 and is now used in healthcare facilities across the country. The data feeds back to a series of national, provincial and district-level dashboards which show medicine levels across facilities.

The central software platform that hosts these dashboards is called the National Surveillance Centre. According to Jamaloodien the platform “allows stakeholders at national and provincial levels to quantify or predict challenges in medicine supply…”.

Additionally, RxSolution generates reports which advise hospital staff on how much of a particular drug they need to order to prevent shortages or overstocking, and which medicines are due to expire.

A similar online tool is the Stock Visibility System, which is used to measure medicine levels at primary healthcare facilities across the country. Unlike RxSolution, it’s accessed on a cell phone app and the data is stored in the cloud (RxSolution requires an in-house server). Healthcare workers scan medicines using the app to capture stocks.

By October, 2021 3826 healthcare facilities had used the Stock Visibility System, RxSolution or other online systems to track drug stocks (roughly 90% of all public hospitals and clinics according to our calculations).

SA better at managing ARVs – trends unclear for other drugs

Evidently, shortages remain, but according to Jamaloodien, these systems have made a positive impact: “Good surveillance systems are one factor in a multifactor situation but do play an important role in reducing stockouts. This can be seen in the downward trend of major stockouts since introducing the surveillance systems…”

Verifying this is difficult however as the health department wasn’t able to provide data over a long period, and independent research has historically focused only on TB drugs or ARVs. Shortages of the latter do appear to have become less common. In 2013, a national survey found that 19% of healthcare facilities had a stockout of ARVs in the past three months. By contrast, interviews that were done with healthcare workers this year suggest that, depending on the quarter, only 5% to 9% could recall shortages of HIV medicines in the past three months.

Whether the surveillance systems played any role in this decline, and whether the same trend holds for stockouts of other drugs, is unclear.

Healthcare workers say software reduces stockouts

A paper published in June assessed the attitudes of 114 users of the National Surveillance Centre. These individuals, mostly managers and pharmacists at different levels in provincial health systems, are responsible for monitoring drug stocks and reporting shortages. Two-thirds of them said the introduction of the National Surveillance Centre in 2016 had improved medicines availability, as having so much data on drug stocks allowed them to be more proactive – for instance by redistributing stocks from facilities that contained an excess of a particular medicine to those with shortages.

Prior to the rollout of this system, many of these individuals had monitored medicine stocks by physically going to facilities or waiting for healthcare workers to notify them of a stockout.

Another paper published in May found positive attitudes toward the Stock Visibility System among healthcare workers who used the system at clinics in Kwazulu-Natal (mostly nurses and pharmacists). Almost three-quarters of the 206 surveyed staff felt that the phone app had improved stock management at their facility, though it had reportedly increased their workload.

This lines up with a national survey in 2017 which found that 87% of healthcare staff reported that the Stock Visibility System had reduced the frequency of stockouts.

Mncengeli Sibanda, a pharmacy expert at Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, says the application has clear benefits: “In the past we’d have to count stocks physically and write it by hand, now it’s captured electronically, limiting capture errors and allowing stock counts to be done more regularly…And at a national level, they can intervene [to prevent shortages] because they have data on stock levels at [most] clinics”.

Loadshedding hinders rollout

RxSolution – which is PC-based – appears to have been similarly well-received among some healthcare workers. Phelelani Dludla, the acting clinical manager of Benedictine hospital in Nongoma in KwaZulu-Natal, says that when the system was introduced at Benedictine in 2019 “it would assist us in making orders before we ran out of stock”. He explains that: “it would tell us [which] stocks would run out and so we’d…reorder them a week earlier than our usual routine”.

Dludla adds that it also assisted in reducing waste: “it helped with finding out which drugs we should cut down on in terms of spending, because they were frequently expiring and being sent back”.

But particularly for rural hospitals like Benedictine, infrastructural problems can pose obstacles. Dludla says that since 2021, network problems caused by loadshedding have prevented the use of RxSolution throughout the hospital. Today, the software is only used in the pharmacy. Sibanda explains that “ideally RxSolutions should be [in each section of the hospital], but there have been challenges”. Aside from loadshedding “some hospitals can’t get a computer into each and every ward,” he says.

Monitoring suppliers

The National Health Department has also been monitoring drug suppliers. Jamaloodien says that companies that are awarded national tenders to provide medicines are “contractually bound to [provide] up-to-date production pipeline data for products that they supply. The mandatory six-month pipeline window allows for proactive prediction and management of looming supply challenges.”

Policies like this have good international precedent. Preliminary evidence found that Canada managed to reduce drug stockouts by forcing pharmaceutical companies to notify them of any supply interruptions. To work, they need to be implemented effectively however, and the National Health Department has previously complained that companies weren’t routinely notifying them of supply interruptions.

Yet if the health department has generally been making such positive strides toward reducing shortages, why are there still so many stockouts?

Global shortages

Part of the problem is international, says Andy Gray, a pharmacy expert at the University of KwaZulu-Natal: “globally, there is a problem with the security of supply in the pharmaceutical industry. For example there are a number of older cancer drugs that are out of stock in the US at the moment, and the UK has had persistent problems with antibiotics.”

Indeed, last week the European Union announced details of a “solidarity mechanism” in which member states who face drug shortages can now request donations from other European countries if they have exhausted all other options. This was after Europe faced repeated shortages of key medicines over its winter.

If a single factory runs into a problem, this can disrupt global supply, including in South Africa, where locally made drugs usually require active ingredients from abroad. Indeed, a 2020 paper found that pharmacists in Gauteng’s hospitals were often left waiting for medicine orders for months after the delivery deadline and many believed that this was due to contracted suppliers facing shortages of active pharmaceutical ingredients.

Local dynamics also play a role however. Problems have historically included the failure of provinces to pay contracted suppliers on time, staff shortages at clinics (which force overworked nurses to be in charge of stock management) and delays in the awarding of pharmaceutical tenders.

Split tenders to reduce vulnerability of supply

According to Gray, another issue is the overreliance on individual companies: “all too often the contract [to supply a particular drug] is awarded to a single supplier”. The conditions of pharmaceutical tenders often stipulate that if the company can’t meet its contractual obligations, the government can turn to alternative suppliers. But that’s easier said than done, says Gray: “If that single supplier is unable to meet demand…the alternative suppliers in the country simply don’t have the volumes to substitute…especially if there’s no prior warning that there is going to be a problem in supply”.

Jamaloodien argues that: “many contracts are currently awarded with…quantities split among suppliers”. However, doing so more frequently would present its own problems, as requiring several companies to produce small amounts of drugs “can invite higher prices because the price is largely related to economies of scale”. In other words, it’s cheaper for one company to supply all the drugs.

Gray acknowledges this but argues that the trade-off needs to be made more often in certain cases: “Vital medicines for which there are no alternatives are being given to maybe one or two suppliers”. The vulnerability this creates can come at enormous cost to patients.

He urges: “for vital medicines we need more split tenders”.

Disclosure: Spotlight editor Marcus Low was a member of the Stop Stockouts Project steering committee for several years in the mid-2010s. Also, Ritshidze is mentioned in this article. Spotlight is published by SECTION27 and the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) and TAC is a Ritshidze member organisation. Spotlight is however editorially independent – an independence that the editors guard jealously. Spotlight is a member of the South African Press Council and subject to the Press Code.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Expert Opinion Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Opinion: Exciting Health Reforms are Possible if We can Move Beyond All the Political Sclerosis

On By ModernMedia

By Marcus Low, Spotlight Editor

It is often enlightening for us at Spotlight to ask how and why certain services differ in the ways they do between the private and public healthcare sectors.

Take something as simple as needing medical help when you have a flu that just won’t go away. As a private sector patient, I’d call my GP’s office and make an appointment. Providing I get there on time, chances are I would at most be asked to wait for 10 or 20 minutes in a comfortable waiting room. By contrast, at many public healthcare facilities, you are not able to make an appointment, and often have to wait for long hours in a poorly ventilated and overcrowded waiting area and will likely end up seeing a nurse rather than a GP.

Some aspects of such differences are understandable, albeit deeply problematic. The shortage of doctors is much more acute in the public sector than in the private sector. There is a moral imperative to address this imbalance, but as previously argued, the current NHI plans are just one way to address it.

Why some public healthcare facilities still do not use appointment systems is harder to explain. Even if some users prefer to queue rather than to have appointments, it is odd that all facilities do not at least have hybrid systems with some appointments and some queueing. Having appointment systems is not rocket science and doesn’t have to cost millions.

There are, of course, other examples. As a private healthcare user, it is relatively trivial for me to get a six-month chronic medication script from my GP and to arrange for the medicines to be delivered to my home. Though there has been significant progress in this direction in the public sector, many people still find it hard to get scripts and collect their medicines.

Of course, differences in available resources are a large part of what is going on here, but it is not the whole story. As a private healthcare user, my needs, my preferences, and my time are generally respected in a way that seems rare in the public sector. To be clear, there are many committed healthcare workers in the public sector who show exemplary respect for their patients, but at a systemic level, as in the decision not to have appointment systems or not to allow for extended medicine refills, people’s time and needs are being disregarded.

Apart from the risk of corruption and mismanagement, much of the middle-class resistance to NHI may well have to do with the fear that people who can now access private healthcare services will become subject to precisely this kind of systemic indifference to their needs. And indeed, while the rhetoric around NHI has often been about ideals like the need for greater social solidarity, we haven’t really seen a vision presented of NHI as offering better, more respectful, and more personalised healthcare.

But, with a bit of flexibility, this could change.

Consider annual checkups. Rather than asking public sector patients to go to overcrowded clinics with long queues for tests, why not give public sector users the option of getting their basic screening tests for HIV, TB, hypertension, and diabetes done at private sector pharmacies along the lines of Discovery Health’s Annual Health Checkup. Of course, data systems will have to be developed to support this and it will have to be budgeted for, but the extra convenience will no doubt make a big difference for many and could help with early detection of these diseases. (We previously wrote about the idea of such an expanded annual checkup programme here.)

Getting the state to pay for such checkups at private sector pharmacies is not exactly NHI as set out in the bill, but the idea certainly shares some DNA.

To be fair, there are at least some exceptions that show such innovation is possible. Maybe most notably, these days many public sector patients can collect their chronic medicines at private pharmacies or other pickup points. Though still a work in progress, the evolution of the public sector medicines distribution system shows that we need not wait for the NHI Bill before taking steps to make things easier and more convenient for users.

In addition, with the NHI pilot projects we have seen at least some awareness that there is a need to try new things and learn from them. Unfortunately, on the whole the NHI pilot projects didn’t meaningfully pilot the key aspects of NHI, and where they did, as with GP contracting, it didn’t go well. And here one gets to the rub. From the outside one gets the impression that those who wanted to run pilots we could actually learn from lost out to those who consider the pilots just another step toward building political support for NHI.

As for the NHI Bill itself, the fact that the ANC and much of the portfolio committee on health, has been intent on reducing almost all discussion on the Bill to a simple for or against shows a clear disdain for meaningful engagement. Indeed, whatever its merits, the ANC’s version of NHI has become fundamentally associated with an overdose of ideology and an absence of curiosity and critical thinking.

But we don’t have to buy into the ANC’s sclerotic thinking.

There are many possible ways to reform and improve our healthcare system. Some will be affordable, some won’t. Either way, it would be foolish to simply turn our backs and pretend they are not there.

*Low is the editor of Spotlight.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : General Interest HospitalsTags :

Interview: Rural Doctor of the Year Reflects on the Rutted Road to Quality Healthcare 

On By ModernMedia
Dr Bukiwe Spondo recently received the Rural Doctor of the Year award at the Rural Health Conference held in Chintsa in the Eastern Cape. PHOTO: Supplied

By Biénne Huisman for Spotlight

Describing the rutted gravel road between Butterworth and Tafalofefe District Hospital in the Eastern Cape, Dr Bukiwe Spondo uses the word “terrible” at least eighteen times. Dipping through the Amatole District, the 55-kilometre journey can take several hours. With heavy rain, tractors may be required to dislodge ambulances and often even staff have difficulty getting to work because of the mud.

Since 2007, Spondo and her colleagues have offered a multitude of services at Tafalofefe in the lush but impoverished Centane village. First off, she moved the hospital’s ARV clinic from an out-building to inside the premises – reducing stigma – “because if patients went into that building on the outside, automatically everyone knew,” she says.

In 2012, having observed how patients stopped taking treatment due to travel costs, she started driving up to 40 kilometres a day twice weekly to nine clinics in the area, where up to fifty patients would be queuing to see her. To make life easier for patients, she started pre-packing medication to take to them at the clinics. Later she opened a CHAMP (Clinical HIV /AIDS Management Programme) site at Tafalofefe to see complicated cases referred from the clinics, and a multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) review clinic in conjunction with Butterworth Provincial Hospital.

“As a rural doctor, you become a social worker, a pharmacist, a priest – you do everything,” she says, laughing.

Rural doctor of the year

Spondo’s efforts have not gone unnoticed. Last month at the Rural Doctor’s Association of South Africa (RuDASA’s) annual Rural Health Conference, she received the Rural Doctor of the Year award. RuDASA chairperson Dr Lungile Hobe conferred the award at the event hosted near Chintsa. Spondo is quick to point out that she also won an Amatole District leadership award last year.

Speaking to Spotlight over Zoom, she says, “So the roads here at Centane are terrible. It becomes a challenge to get ambulances through and the chopper cannot fly either when it’s raining. I mean, the other day a truck was stuck, crossing the road so the ambulance couldn’t pass. We had to take a private car from the hospital to go meet the ambulance halfway.”

She adds that the community hoped that roads would be improved after a devastating accident five kilometres from Tafalofefe in 2020 when an overloaded 65-seater bus plunged into a gorge, causing 25 deaths and 62 injuries. But, she says, the improvements never come.

At Tafalofefe, the two nearest referral hospitals are Cecilia Makiwane and Frere Provincial in East London, situated an additional 110 kilometres or 90-minute drive from Butterworth along the N2 highway. Housed in a pale building, Tafalofefe has 160 beds served by 41 professional nurses and seven doctors – including three community service doctors who joined last year. The additions have increased capacity, for example, emergency caesareans are now available around the clock.

Taking healthcare to the people

The hospital has three 4×4 bakkies [pick-ups] for visiting or transporting patients. It is in one of these that Spondo travels to see patients in remote corners between the Kobonqaba and Kei Rivers on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

“Clinics are part of decentralised primary healthcare goals,” she says. “But the problem was that if there were complicated cases – like if a patient is taking ARVs and then develop side effects, the sisters are not equipped to handle that. For example, if there is a kidney problem, they [cannot] do anything about that.

“And in time, I realised that for these people traveling to the hospital costs too much money. Let’s say, for example, the clinic at Qolora – for a person to travel from Qolora to Tafalofefe is R100. A return ticket is R200. And you know, most people here are unemployed. They can’t afford this. By the time they have saved up enough money to travel to the hospital, it’s too late. Like it would be the end stage of their kidney problem. You could not send this patient for dialysis, nothing could be done to help them. This is why I started my outreach trips.”

In motivating for Spondo to receive the RuDASA award, Tafalofefe’s CEO Masizakhe Madlebe pointed out how her work days start at 7am, only finishing once all patients had been seen, whether at the hospital or at one of the local clinics. In addition, he notes how, over the years, Spondo has mentored youth in the area, including children whose parents had succumbed to AIDS, and school girls on topics like life goals and contraceptives. He adds that Spondo even reached into her own pocket to pay school fees for children without parents.

Spondo relays how she noticed girls as young as twelve years old in their maternity ward, giving birth. “Myself and some nurses we went to two schools in the area to educate them, to discuss goals and contraceptives,” she says. “We started with grade 12 pupils. No teachers were present. It was just us and them. And I was surprised at how free they were talking. I said to them education is more important. I said to them – You see me? I am a doctor. One day you can be a doctor too, but you need to be educated. I told them they could come to Tafalofefe any time if they needed to talk, that I could help them apply for tertiary degrees, to college or to university.”

Spondo has kept a close eye on children orphaned by AIDS in the area. “I tell them to bring me their June, September, and December school reports, so I can see how they’re doing, so I can motivate them,” she says.

“These kids, I’ve seen them grow up. Some of them I saw angry – with everyone, with their own deceased parents. And I explained to them, don’t be angry. It’s not your mother’s fault. It’s not your father’s fault. It was the government’s fault for not giving your parents access to ARVs. But now, take your own ARVs and you will be fine. Some of them have passed high school with distinction, some even now have access to universities.”

Bringing her skills back home

Alongside two brothers whom she describes as “wonderful”, Spondo grew up in the village of Nqamakwe, on the opposite side of Butterworth. Her parents have passed away, but she still considers Nqamakwe her home. Here her family’s farming interests include cattle, goats, and sheep.

She attended Blythswood Secondary School in Nqamakwe – excelling at biology and physics, even though maths was hard work. “Becoming a doctor was just something I always wanted,” she says, relaying how in her formative years she had been a sickly child who often required medical care. This changed, she says, as she cannot remember ever being sick as an adult.

Spondo graduated from medical school at the University of KwaZulu-Natal in 2002, completing her internship at Cecilia Makiwane and her community service at Tafalofefe and Frere in 2004.

Speaking with rapid enthusiasm, she says how happy she is to bring her healthcare skills back home to serve the community that shaped her own humanity.

“I mean, I know these people inside out. I was born in front of them, raised in front of them,” she says. “These are our relatives, our aunts, our grannies. It’s giving back to them, to the community that raised you, that has done everything for you. Who supported you through all these years.”

She adds that Tafalofefe’s clinical manager, Sambona Ntamo, grew up near Butterworth too.

“Who would look after these people if we didn’t?” she asks.

Where does she find the resilience that drives her passion to care for sick people, often queuing at the end of long rutted roads?

“Lots of exercise,” she says, smiling.

At Tafalofefe there is a staff gym with a treadmill, a bicycle, weight lifts, and pilates balls.

“I tell the guys after work it’s gym time, it’s gym time, it’s gym time!” she says. “We’ve got a key and everyone knows that even if they want to go to the gym after midnight, they may get the key and go.”

Photographs capture an air of camaraderie at Tafalofefe. Staff sharing a meal of tripe and creamed spinach on heritage day, a farewell gathering for a retiring nurse with balloons and huge gifts in silver wrapping, [and] women knitting countless bright beanies for babies delivered in the maternity ward. A picture inside the hospital’s paediatric room shows youngsters on plastic motorbikes and mothers holding toddlers wrapped in blankets.

Spondo and her own eight-year-old son, Lutho desperately – which means the greatest one – live in a doctor’s house on the hospital’s premises. They travel to their family home in Nqamakwe over weekends.

For Spondo, being a doctor does not feel like a job. “When you do something you love, it doesn’t feel like a job,” she says. “Being a doctor is something I look forward to every morning. When patients return to me, saying they feel better with a smile on their faces, saying thank you for the treatment – that just makes my day.”

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons 4.0 Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : General Interest Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Interview: A Simple Device Used after Birth can Help Save Lives, Says Award-winning Young Innovator

On By ModernMedia
Last month, she won the Mandela Rhodes Foundation’s award for social impact in Africa for a device that can help save the lives of women who suffer excessive bleeding after child birth. PHOTO: Nasief Manie/Spotlight

By Biénne Huisman for Spotlight

As a child growing up in the Ugandan capital of Kampala, Maureen Etuket used a screwdriver to dismantle electronic appliances and toy trucks. “I was around eight, nine years old,” she says. “I guess it just excited me.”

Slightly over a decade later, this curiosity is driving her quest to find solutions to public healthcare challenges.

Last month, Etuket’s Smart PVD device [Postpartum Haemorrhage Volumetric Drape] won the Mandela Rhodes Foundation’s award for social impact in Africa – the 2023 Äänit Prize – with a cash grant of $38 000. At the awards ceremony in Cape Town, judges described the device as “a brilliantly practical intervention that can immediately and directly improve outcomes for patients”.

Inside the Anatomy Building on the University of Cape Town (UCT)’s Health Sciences campus, Etuket explains that she and her team devised a prototype after spending three months in maternity wards at Kawempe National Referral Hospital in Kampala.

“We went almost every day. We had day shifts and night shifts,” she recalls. “I started asking the question to nurses and midwives, how do you know that a woman is likely to get to PPH?” PPH or post-partum haemorrhage is excessive bleeding after a baby’s birth, which could cause a severe drop in blood pressure leading to shock and death if not treated.

“Like, how do you tell? What criteria do you use? And the nurses told me that they had been doing this for a long time. They said they just observe and know. And I thought to myself, if that was working, we would have [fewer] women dying from PPH.”

How does the Smart PVD device work?

“There’s something already on the market – an under-buttock drape bag attached to the bed while a woman is giving birth, which measures amount of blood loss,” says Etuket. “[It’s] basically a bag where the blood flows into. We then created an electronic module that has a probe and a buzzer, which we put inside this bag, and it gives a beeping sound when the blood has reached a certain level. This alarm alerts a midwife to recognise the need to attend to a particular case. So the blood collection module is disposable. And the electronic module, which has the probe and the buzzer, is reusable.”

Etuket declines to share pictures, citing intellectual property rights.

“I really think that this is one of the simplest innovations,” she says. “We’ve been pitching it and talking about it, and everyone that listens is just like it’s common sense, right?” Apart from the Äänit Prize, they have received $16 000 from the Makerere University’s research and innovations fund and $55 000 from the science and technology secretariat in Uganda.

Moving to Cape Town

Etuket moved to Cape Town in 2021, courtesy of a Mandela Rhodes Foundation scholarship. “I applied for a Masters in health innovation at UCT under the Mandela Rhodes Foundation. So, I’m Christian. I believe in the hand of God in everything I do. I made just that one application. Like, there were options to put three universities, three courses, all that. I just wanted health innovation at UCT, and I got it.”

Her Masters supervisor was Professor Sudesh Sivarasu, internationally renowned for medical device innovation and head of UCT’s MedTech laboratory.

“There were so many questions we had at Pumzi Devices about how to transition an innovation to the market and no one really had the answers because it’s a new space. At a certain point, some of us had to travel to Scotland just to sit with experts to guide us through a protocol design process. No one in Uganda really had a clear picture of [this] so that’s what prompted me to do the Masters in health innovation,” says Etuket.

Find your purpose

Presently, she is pursuing a PhD in industrial engineering at Stellenbosch University under the supervision of Professor Sara Grobbelaar and Dr Faatiema Salie. Yet she spends most of her time at UCT, where Sivarasu is her external co-supervisor. Etuket’s PhD’s working title is “Exploring the development of a localisation roadmap for medical devices in South Africa using an Innovation Systems Framework”. She explains that this line of study – systems engineering – is drawing her thinking wider to understand the systems around biomedical design and innovation.

Going forward, Etuket will continue to lecture students back home in Uganda – online – while being open to further her learning and practice where it is apt or required around the world.

At 28 years old, Etuket’s drive and achievements make her a role model for many. However, she is reluctant to wear the label of “a pioneering young black woman,” voicing caution over mantels based on race and gender. “I notice that when we start to have those mindsets, we may end up trampling on people, on men. We have to work together. There is room for all of us,” she says.

The first born of four siblings, Etuket’s father was a computer engineer and her mother an accountant and businesswoman. Elaborating on leadership, she says, “I think it’s important to pray for people. That’s where we get guidance on how to lead. I tell people, not everyone should do a PhD, maybe not everyone should do a Masters, but find your purpose and fulfil it.”

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons 4.0 Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Healthcare Politics and Regulations Respiratory DiseasesTags :

Opinion: This Court Case will Literally Determine whether Some People Get to Breathe

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash

By Aneesa Adams for Spotlight

In a pivotal case for access to affordable medicines in South Africa, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) and Doctors Without Borders (MSF) Southern Africa – represented by SECTION27 – earlier this year came together to help champion access to lifesaving new cystic fibrosis treatments.

Cheri Nel, a South African woman living with cystic fibrosis, and the Cystic Fibrosis Association started legal action against Vertex Pharmaceuticals earlier this year, challenging Vertex’s monopoly on the treatments. The TAC and MSF approached the court to be joined as amici curiae. Vertex, an American pharmaceutical company, holds the patents for both Trikafta and Kalydeco – medicines that have the potential to significantly improve the lives of cystic fibrosis patients. However, at a price of US $311 000 per year per patient in the United States (over R5 million), it is out of reach for most people living with cystic fibrosis.

The court application is for a compulsory licence, which, if granted, will mean another manufacturer of generics for Trikafta and Kalydeco would be permitted to enter the South African market. In this case, it is likely that competition between manufacturers would affect the price of this medicine, thus making it more accessible. A compulsory licence allows the holder of the license to produce a patented product without the patent holder’s consent.

Johannesburg-based investment banker Cheri Nel is the driving force behind a court case that may result in dramatically expanded access to life-changing new cystic fibrosis (CF) medicines. PHOTO: Supplied

Spotlight previously reported that Nel’s lawyers argued that by failing to register or supply their CF medicines in South Africa, make them available in South Africa at reasonable prices, or license other companies to supply the medicines, Vertex is abusing its patents. They further argued that Vertex’s actions are violating the Constitutional rights of people with cystic fibrosis in South Africa, including the right to health care. (Spotlight previously reported on the issue here, here, and here.)

Cystic fibrosis is a devastating multi-system illness known for causing frequent and severe lung infections, liver and pancreatic damage, lung failure, and can result in the potential need for lung transplants even in children from as young as two years old.

This case will set an important precedent that can influence access to medicines not only in South Africa but around the world. The involvement of SECTION27, where I work, underscores the broader issue of affordable access to medicines and the impact of intellectual property on healthcare access.

At present, MSF and TAC are awaiting the court’s decision to be admitted as friends of the court, while in the main application, the respondent (Vertex) has filed answering affidavits.

And while the clock is ticking in the courts, many families in South Africa are waiting and holding on to the glimmer of hope access to this medicine represents. For many who live with cystic fibrosis, a successful outcome of Nel and the Cystic Fibrosis Association’s application will mean a life where they can breathe easier.

Among those waiting is 6-year-old Janco Koorts.

A journey of hope

His mother, Tanya Koorts, says living with cystic fibrosis is like fighting every day for every breath. She says Janco had been diagnosed with cystic fibrosis at the age of two. She has since been on a mission to raise awareness about this life-threatening disease. It is hope, her family, and the support from the cystic fibrosis community that has kept her going, she says.

Reflecting on the start of their journey in the Northern Cape, she says, “The knowledge about cystic fibrosis is very little. We were lucky that Dr Jooste at the Kimberly public hospital diagnosed him so early on. After that, he sent us to the Red Cross Hospital in Cape Town and so our long journey of hope started.”

Later in a new job in a new city, the Koorts began again in Pretoria. They started Janco’s treatment at the Steve Biko Academic Hospital and then moved to the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital.

“They don’t have much, but they do everything they can there to help. They also don’t have a lot of support but the people at Charlotte Maxeke helped Janco on his journey to stay breathing,” Koorts says, applauding the public health system.

Janco now has comprehensive medical aid which covers his monthly R48 000 medication bill and Koorts says she can now “breathe easier”. That, however, is just a fraction of the cost of living with cystic fibrosis.

When the Koorts family heard about Trixacar, a generic version of Trikafta, it only strengthened their resolve to save Janco’s life. The patent rights registered by Vertex Pharmaceuticals in South Africa, however, do not allow for the import of Trixacar. Trixacar is produced by the pharmaceutical company Gador in Argentina. Koorts will thus have to travel to Argentina to buy the medicine. This will cost about R400 000 to cover the travel costs and six boxes of Trixacar that will last six months, she says. (You can help the family fund this by donating here.)

‘a thief of joy’

Apart from the financial burden, having a young child with cystic fibrosis has affected the Koorts family mentally and emotionally.

“Cystic fibrosis is a thief of joy. Nobody speaks about fighting to save someone’s life,” says Koorts.

She says her family had to adjust to some of the social changes in their surroundings as well.

“At school, he has to fight for himself to stay alive. If we go to a restaurant and there are people smoking, it affects him and we have to move. So, as much as we have tried to give Janco a normal childhood, these social aspects will always hinder progress, and he is always reminded that he is sick. But I live in hope and so does he.”

In terms of her family relationships, Tanya says that her other children are healthy and for them to see their baby brother suffering every day hurts them.

“It’s painful as parents. Janco needs all the attention. I can’t go to a parent’s evening for my other kids. It’s difficult,” Koorts says.

She says she is proud of Janco.

“My child doesn’t know that he is dying. We fight every day so that Janco can have just one more breath.”

And that is ultimately what it is all about. From one perspective the exchange of documents in the High Court may seem abstract and full of legal technicalities. But let there be no doubt, for kids like Janco it is literally their futures that are being decided.

*Adams is a communications officer at SECTION27.

NOTE: This opinion piece was written by a staff member of SECTION27. Spotlight is published by SECTION27 and the TAC, but is editorially independent – an independence that the editors guard jealously. The views expressed in this piece are not necessarily those of Spotlight.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Healthcare Politics and Regulations HospitalsTags :

Concerns Raised at Public Health Conference over Freezing of Healthcare Worker Posts

On By ModernMedia

By Luvuyo Mehlwana for Spotlight

Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on Unsplash

The National Treasury’s Cost Containment Letter sent to government departments instructing, among others, the freezing of posts was one of the big themes underlying talks about building South Africa’s healthcare worker capacity during the Public Health Association of South Africa’s (PHASA) conference held recently in Gqeberha.

With Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana expected to deliver the medium-term budget policy statement on 1 November, the freezing of posts will further hamstrung already strained health services, some presenters at the conference warned.

An oversight visit to TB hospitals by members of the provincial legislature (MPLs) in the Eastern Cape in the first week of September (5 to 8 September) showed just how bad the staff shortages are. The only remaining hospital in Nelson Mandela Bay dedicated to TB services, Jose Pearson Hospital in Bethelsdorp, has had staff vacancies hovering around 20% since 2019. The hospital provides dedicated TB services to the western part of the province. MPLs heard that in some other hospitals, vacancy rates are even higher, and non-filling of critical posts in some cases results in further medico-legal claims against the department, as the current staff buckles under massive patient loads.

Last year, in response to a parliamentary question, figures the health department released showed that there were 3 892 vacant healthcare worker posts in the province. In the nursing categories, there was a vacancy rate of 15.3%. For paramedics (EMS) the vacancy rate was 10.7%, medical practitioners 8.4%, and pharmacists 13.7%. By June this year, in another response relating to specialist nurses, the vacancy rate in the province had dropped to 13%.

Dr Prudence Ditlopo Senior Researcher at the University of the Witwatersrand, was presenting her research on the impact of nurse workloads and professional support on healthcare outcomes at the PHASA conference. Ditlopo said nurses already have a huge workload and issues around budget cuts impact morale. “I am sure they are asking themselves what will happen to [them] when we [they’re] already understaffed.

“This is not the first time that this monotonous cycle has been happening. Yes, we understand the economic side of it, but at the very same time, what does it say about the well-being of the nurse practice environment, the patients, and the quality of patient care? If nurses see that they are overwhelmed by the workload, they will make sure to find ways that will enable them to cope.

“Enable them to cope” means nurses will find a way that works for them. If what works for them is only seeing ten patients per day, they will do that and they will be gatekeepers for other patients who are coming to the facility. That alone will influence the quality and standard of care in primary care in South Africa,” said Ditlopo.

‘Will create more problems’

Dr Busisiwe Matiwane of the University of The Witwatersrand’s School of Public Health also weighed in on the implications of the Treasury letter.

“In the current system, health professionals have to work for the government to fulfil their community service obligations. However, it can be challenging for them to be assigned to specific hospitals when it is time for their community service. Additionally, with the government announcing a freeze on posts, many individuals who are not government-funded may be compelled to seek employment outside of the government after completing their community service,” Matiwane told delegates.

“If these posts are indeed frozen, does that mean that the government will also halt the placement of individuals who are required to complete community service? The current structure dictates that if you fail to fulfil your community service, you will not be recognised by the statutory bodies as an independent practitioner.

“The implication of this proposal by the government will create more problems, as we already face the challenge of health professionals’ placement or their community services,” she said. “The main concern is whether the posts will be frozen and what will be done. I think this concern has raised questions for many people, who wonder what it means if they are unable to complete their community service or the internship. Does it mean they cannot work?” she asked.

‘protect what is already there’

Speaking on the sidelines of the three-day conference, director of the Rural Health Advocacy Project, Russell Rensburg, said the wage agreement on a 4.5% increase for the public sector had Treasury’s back against the wall since that was not budgeted for in their February budget.

“Treasury is playing hardball and the provinces must decide what they need. The national government must also decide what they need. If they follow through on this, they won’t be able to sustain the public health system. There is concern that doctors will leave as part of cost containment measures, and you can’t run a healthcare system without healthcare workers. But we will only know the true position of the Treasury when they publish the medium-term budget policy statement,” said Rensburg.

“I believe at the moment they are just testing the market. They are saying we must have one thing, but we can’t have both, so that is the game they are playing. Our position is clear on this issue. Before any salary cuts or job freezes, we need to protect what is already there. We need to retain this year’s cohort of community service doctors, pharmacists, and nurses because these people helped us during COVID-19. Some were interns during COVID-19 and they are the core that can build the health service in the post-COVID-19 era. So, the immediate priority is to retain those posts because we don’t know if there will still be community service going forward,” said Rensburg.

‘working with what we have’

Several speakers and presenters at the PHASA conference raised concerns about the existing scarcity of healthcare workers and urged the Department of Health to take action. The experts, academics, researchers, students, non-governmental organisations, and civil society members all agree that healthcare is a fundamental human right, but that right won’t be fulfilled without healthcare workers, as there cannot be health services without workers. The government’s key policy document on human resources for health warned as far back as 2020 that the country is facing a critical shortage of healthcare workers.

Dr Krish Vallabhjee, former Chief Director of Strategy and Health Support in the Western Cape Health Department, believes that management must use whatever resources are available to achieve good results.

Vallabhjee said, “Budget cuts are a reality, so whatever we talk about here and in many of these conference sessions, we can’t be talking about wanting more and more. We need to work with what we have. How can we repurpose the people we have? Can’t we use them more effectively to achieve the same effect?” he asked.

“Managers need to work with their staff instead of just sitting in some corner and making budget cut decisions. Managers need to engage with staff to address the problem of not having enough budget. How do we work together? What are our priorities? As managers, we must listen to what people are saying on the ground. What are the doctors, nurses, and local managers saying? We must be united. [It should not be a thing that one hospital, clinic, and the district [are] fighting for their own piece. We are one department and we have this problem of a budget. How do we unite and do the best we can?”

Government will clarify

In a cabinet statement issued on 14 September, Minister in the Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said that Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana would clarify the cost-containment letter issued on August 31.

“Cabinet appreciates the current fiscal constraints which are not unique to South Africa but have resulted in budget shortfall. Cabinet has iterated that measures to address the budget shortfall must not impact negatively on service delivery. The Minister of Finance will shortly issue guidelines clarifying the unintended misunderstanding arising from the Cost Containment Letter issued on 31 August 2023. In addition, as part of the in-year performance review of progress in implementation priorities agreed to with Ministers, the President, and Deputy President will meet with individual Ministers to ensure that fiscal management does not derail the agreed to priorities.”

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

Opinion: A UN Meeting on TB is at Best a Means to More Important Ends

On By ModernMedia
Tuberculosis bacteria. Credit: CDC

By Marcus Low for Sporlight

In 2018 the first findings from a landmark tuberculosis (TB) vaccine trial were published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The experimental vaccine, called M72, was found to be roughly 50% effective in preventing pulmonary TB disease. It was the most promising finding for a new TB vaccine since the development of the BCG vaccine a century ago.

Since the study reported in the NEJM was only a phase 2B study, the results have to be confirmed in a phase 3 study before the vaccine can be considered for wider use. For a while, it seemed that the phase 3 study would never happen – that is, until a few months ago, two philanthropies, Wellcome and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, announced that they would put up $550 million to get it done.

Meanwhile, on September 22, ministers, heads of state, and other officials from around the world will gather in New York for the second United Nations High-Level Meeting on TB. A draft declaration can be read here. The declaration is full of the kind of lofty rhetoric one would expect.

Yet, it is hard to avoid a sense that, for the most part, the emperor is wearing no clothes. After all, as one government representative after another read their speeches in New York, everyone in the room will know that it was not governments but two philanthropies who stepped up to ensure that arguably the most important TB trial of the decade goes ahead. When most needed, the groundswell of new government investment in TB research just wasn’t there.

The bigger picture

It is estimated that globally just over $1 billion was invested in TB research in 2021. In the preceding three years, the figure was hovering between $900 million and $1 billion. Astonishingly, $416 million (over 40%) of the $1 billion in 2021 was from the United States government. The second largest funder of TB research in the world is the Gates Foundation – which with its $113 million in 2021 invested more in TB research than any government except for the US. Together, these two entities account for more than half of all investment in TB research in 2021.

BRICS partners India and South Africa respectively invested $23.4 and $4.8 million in TB research in 2021. Both are classified as high TB burden countries.

At the 2018 UN High-Level Meeting on TB world leaders committed to provide $2 billion per year for TB research by the end of 2022. Figures for 2022 aren’t out yet, but given that the 2021 figure was only half the target, we are clearly not on track.

In addition, the target should probably be much higher if we are to have a good chance of getting the breakthrough diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines we will need to end TB. The Stop TB Partnership recently estimated that around $5 billion is needed for TB research per year from 2023 to 2030 – in other words, five times as much as the actual investment in 2021. This level of investment in TB research is needed because modelling suggests that with the currently available tools, we will at best see a relatively slow decline in TB rates in the coming years.

Why then a High-Level Meeting?

One may well ask what the point is of UN High-Level Meetings if key commitments made at these meetings are not kept and if the further development of critical new tools like M72 remains dependent on support from philanthropists. But that would be to mistake these meetings for an end in themselves rather than merely a means to an end.

A meeting of this nature will always just be one small part of a larger puzzle in the fight against TB. The bigger question is how the momentum and political potential created by the High-Level Meeting can be leveraged to get more done in other arenas, especially back in people’s home countries.

Governments are accountable to the people who elected them. There are, of course, some international pressures and some issues of international law, but on something like TB, the most important accountability levers are all domestic. Ultimately, political parties, trade unions, and domestic civil society have much more power over what a government actually does or does not do than some politely expressed peer pressure in New York or Geneva.

Unfortunately, at least here in South Africa, political parties and trade unions have generally failed to hold government to account when it comes to TB – although our Department of Health has nevertheless made some good policy calls and our investment in TB research is decent given the size of our economy.

All of this is not to say that the UN High-Level Meeting on TB is not important – it most certainly is. It is just that it should not be mistaken for an end in itself. Governments, and especially those in countries where many people get TB and die of TB, must invest more in TB. We shouldn’t let leaders of these governments get away with saying they’ll put up the money in New York, but then forgetting all about it once they go back home.

NOTE: The Gates Foundation is mentioned in this article. Spotlight receives funding from the Gates Foundation. Spotlight is editorially independent, an independence that the editors guard jealously. Spotlight is a member of the South African Press Council.

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

In-depth: What Two Major Bills Might Mean for Health Sector Procurement in SA

On By ModernMedia
Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town

By Alicestine October for Spotlight

Recently, in a major feat for transparency and accountability, the North Gauteng High Court ordered that the public must have access to COVID-19 procurement contracts – details of which, until now, have been kept away from the public eye as the government cited confidentiality clauses.

The Health Justice Initiative’s – who brought the court application – victory is a crucial one given the staggering size of public procurement contracts in the health sector.

According to Zukiswa Kota, South African Programme Head at the Public Service Accountability Monitor (PSAM), this judgement deserves celebrating “as it deepens the case for transparency in public procurement and effectively challenges the many reasons often used to evade publication”. “Ultimately, what we need is proactive disclosure that is built into procurement legislation and – more importantly – is adhered to by government,” said Kota.

“It is inconceivable,” she said, “that in 2023 there continues to be limited transparency around fairly basic info – in this case COVID-19 vaccines. “The fact that there is no explicit transparency is an indictment and something we need to reflect on.”

The need for transparency has also been affirmed in the HJI judgement. “Non-disclosure of any of the records sought means that a shroud of secrecy is placed over the entire negotiation, procurement, and payment process – the very mischief our Constitution and legislation such as Paia seeks to address,” the judgement states. S217 of the Constitution states that public procurement by any state organ must be “in accordance with a system which is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective”. 

The case for transparency

The call for open contracting and to strengthen public procurement legislation is not a new one. It is also not confined to COVID-19 vaccines, but all public procurement, also in the health sector.

Dominic Brown, director at the Alternative Information & Development Centre (AIDC), also recently during a webinar on the launch of a report on pending legislative and regulatory changes in the healthcare sector made the case for transparent procurement. The Rural Health Advocacy Project compiled the report that also provides several recommendations for procurement reforms.

“The level of public procurement in the country is approximately 25% of GDP and the majority of government’s involvement in the economy is through this procurement, so it’s no small issue. It’s of extreme significance,” said Brown.

He said that in 2016, the former chief procurement officer in National Treasury estimated that between 30 to 40% of the country’s procurement budget is lost to inflated prices and fraud by the private sector. At the time, this amounted to R230 billion.

“At the moment, our procurement budget is about R1 trillion, which means that we are losing between R300 and R400 billion each year as a result of corruption linked to public procurement and this has major detrimental impacts on service delivery.”

Putting this impact into perspective, especially as it pertains to the health sector, RHAP’s director, Russel Rensburg during the same webinar said that provinces can spend up to 30% of their health budgets on the procurement of goods and services, which can run into billions. “Contrast this with the huge chunk spent on employee costs (often between 60 and 65% of health budgets), and growing inefficiencies and waste due to non-compliance to legislative prescripts – the pool of money remaining for health services is limited,” he said.

“Lack of compliance with financial management policies, particularly around supply chain monitoring policies, has resulted in the deterioration of several financial management indicators. We’ve seen an increase in qualified audit opinions of health departments and an increase in irregular and wasteful expenditure – amounting to R6 billion in the last financial year,” said Rensburg. “Competent financial management is essential to ensuring that maximum value is achieved from the resources deployed.”

The need for this “competent financial management” in the public sector was highlighted again last week when the Gauteng Department of Health’s Annual Report for 2022/23 was tabled in the provincial legislature. The report showed irregular expenditure to the value of over R2 billion, which means legislative prescripts were not followed in the procurement of goods and services, among others. In the Auditor-General’s (AG) report, she flagged the irregular expenditure stating that there were no effective and appropriate steps taken to prevent it. “The majority of this irregular expenditure,” the AG stated, “was caused by the department’s failure to invite competitive bids” when procuring goods and services.

Legislative reforms and procurement

Currently, in Parliament’s National Assembly, MPs are set to deliberate on the Public Procurement Bill. The bill provides for far-reaching reforms in public procurement. In Parliament’s National Council of Provinces, deliberations on the National Health Insurance Bill are underway. This bill also provides for far-reaching reforms to how health services will be structured and funded.

Both pieces of legislation have major implications for procurement in the health sector.

Yet, with these legislative reforms underway in Parliament, some stakeholders say that neither bill in its current form, will be a silver bullet to address all shortcomings in public procurement in the health sector. Questions also remain if these bills will ultimately result in real consequences for errant public officials in supply chain management or overreaching political office bearers.

Added to this is the overlap between provisions in the two bills, several provisions that lack clarity, and some areas of conflict between the bills that may lead to confusion down the line.

The case for alignment between the bills

The Public Procurement Bill aims to standardise and create a uniform regulatory framework for all procurement by government departments and entities. The NHI Bill, in turn, if passed will transform how publicly-funded health services are organised and delivered. The bill provides for a NHI Fund that will “strategically purchase healthcare services on behalf of users”.

Rensburg explains this fund must transfer funds directly to accredited and contracted central, provincial, regional, specialised and district hospitals based on a global budget or Diagnosis-related Groups. The bill also provides for an Office of Health Products Procurement (OHPP), he said, but the exact scope of this office’s mandate is not yet clear.

According to the bill, this office (OHPP) will be responsible for “the centralised facilitation and coordination of functions related to the public procurement of health-related products”.

According to Yana van Leeve, from the law firm ENSafrica, the NHI fund will be a S3A public entity so the procurement bill will apply to that entity. S3A public entities under the Public Finance Management Act can be defined as a public entity with the mandate to fulfil a specific economic or social responsibility of government and they depend on government funding and public money.

Van Leeve was also a panellist during the RHAP webinar.

She explained that section 217 of the Constitution will also apply to this process of acquiring services because the NHI Fund will be engaging in public procurement when it engages healthcare service providers and health establishments in both the public and private sectors. Van Leeve said that it is not clear in the NHI Bill, however, that “there is an appreciation that this dimension of the scheme will amount to formal procurement and will thus be subject to normal procurement law”. “The implication would then be that one of the prescribed forms of procurement, for example, quotations or open bidding must be used to secure the services of these health service providers.” According to her, the NHI Bill, however, creates the impression that there is a different type of arrangement to be considered for the acquiring of such services. In section 39 of the NHI Bill, for example, accreditation of health service providers is required.

The procurement bill, in turn, provides for a Public Procurement Office that must create and maintain a database of prospective suppliers. Departments or other public entities may only procure from suppliers listed in this database. This may result in some practical problems as the requirements to be added to the existing central supplier database of National Treasury may differ from what the NHI Bill requires from suppliers. For example, to get on the database, National Treasury may consider a legitimate entity as one with a valid tax certificate, but, said van Leeve, “If you are procuring health products, for example, you may need other things to accredit a potential supplier, which treasury does not necessarily look at when it builds its database”.

“So, immediately you can see there will be tension between what the NHI envisage for creating its services and products lists versus what the public procurement office will develop in terms of the national supplier database. So, on the one hand, NHI is creating a special procurement system for health and providing for units and committees that will be responsible for identifying health services and buying health products and it’s not clear how these two pieces of legislation are going to interact.”

Van Leeve did say, however, that it is possible that the Minister of Finance “can differentiate between institutions and categories of procurement, but nothing in the procurement bill currently requires the minister to do so and there is no guidance on the considerations relevant to differentiating between categories of public institutions”.

She said it is possible for the bill to still make clear provision for the minister to make exemptions from the procurement bill. Currently, section 56(b) of the bill, for example, only provides – “the Minister may, with or without conditions, by notice in the Gazette, exempt a procuring institution from any provision of this Act, if— (a) national security could reasonably be expected to be compromised, or (b) the procurement is to be funded partially or in full by donor or grant funding and such exemption will benefit the public in general or a section of the public”.

But van Leeve insists that one way or the other, “It will be important – certainly in the way in which the NHI and procurement bills become operationalised for there to be comity between the bills.”

The RHAP report also recommends that “the relationship between health authorities and the public procurement structures proposed in the draft Public Procurement Bill must be clarified. The Public Procurement Bill makes no specific reference to health procurement as a special type of public procurement. At the same time, the NHI Bill contemplates a very particular regime in respect of health procurement. These two draft Bills will have to be aligned.”

According to the report, “the tension between the decentralised nature of public finance management in South Africa under the PFMA and Municipal Finance Management Act on the one hand and the highly centralised nature of public health services spending under the proposed NHI on the other hand, will have to be addressed”.

The shadow of politics

There are also other considerations besides overlapping provisions in the two bills – the shadow of politics through the blurring of the administrative and political interface often becomes a problem.

Rensburg highlighted, among others, it is still not clear how compliance with procurement policies will be audited and how often, or what the different sanctions will be for those not complying. “We see, especially with emergency procurement, that managing procurement functions is open to a lot of different kinds of pressures, he said. “The procurement bill does create frameworks for public office bearers to not be involved in the procurement process and for subject matter experts to be involved in procurement decisions, but there are a lot of things happening in the shadow that you can’t explicitly link to involvement of political principles in administrative processes,” said Rensburg.

“There is an added complexity,” Brown said, “when you hear, for example, of ANC tender committees, or when there is a tender chairperson who then can determine who gets and doesn’t get various contracts. This is deeply rooted in the state – from local government all the way up to national level, and across state-owned enterprises.”

Case in point, in the public health sector, the Digital Vibes scandal epitomised this “complexity” when then-Minister of Health, Dr Zweli Mkhize was implicated in tender irregularities and subsequently resigned.

Another criticism of the Public Procurement Bill is that it leaves a lot, arguably too much,  of the detail of how procurement will actually work up to regulation rather than setting it down in primary legislation. This, suggested Caroline James and Sam Sole in a recent Daily Maverick article, leaves the door open to political interference.

Corruption Watch’s executive director, Karam Singh, during a different webinar in August on the procurement bill by the Special Interest Group on Public Procurement Law, also flagged some gaps in the definitions in the procurement bill, especially around issues like conflicts of interest and politically exposed persons.

In terms of chapter three of the procurement bill that deals with procurement integrity and prohibition of certain practices and debarment, anybody who is involved in the procurement process – that is from the accounting officer, bid committee, or tribunal – must comply with the prescribed code of conduct, failing which will constitute misconduct. According to Singh, however, the bill falls short of stipulating who must issue the code of conduct, how it would be updated, and where it would work, as well as where or when it must be made available. “There is very little detail on how misconduct would be handled,” he said, “and so there is a gap between understanding what this code of conduct would be, how it would come about and if it will be presented for public participation and public comment.” He said it is also unclear what would be the enforcement mechanism which would stand behind the code of conduct to make it effective.

Responding to concerns over tender corruption risks

In June this year, during a briefing by Dr Nicholas Crisp, Deputy Director-General in the National Health Department on the NHI Bill to MPs in the NCOP, concerns were flagged over the risk of tender corruption in the NHI Fund. Later, in August during a briefing to MPLs in the Western Cape provincial legislature, the same concerns were raised.

At every point, Crisp insisted, “The NHI Fund will handle very little by way of tender. The accreditation is not a tender process. It’s voluntary registration by a service provider – public or private – as long as they meet the criteria. The prices will be fixed and the way services are delivered will be fixed when it comes to the procurement.”

According to Crisp, when it comes to the procurement processes for goods, particularly health products, the NHI Fund is only involved in the first stage. “The Fund would not go about the logistics of purchasing anything. The providers needed to purchase once those prices were set. There was far less vulnerability in the Fund than first thought when one looked at the Bill,” he said.

Spotlight followed up with Crisp for further clarification in lieu of the RHAP report and the implications of the procurement bill for the NHI Bill. Crisp said, that according to the NHI Bill, the Fund will determine the Formulary that it will pay for and will establish the prices of the items in the Formulary. “It is the intention that the NHI agency will not buy any ‘health products’ and will not have storerooms and warehouses since the agency (the NHI Fund) is not a provider of services. The providers will buy what they need to deliver the benefits that they are accredited to provide. Accredited providers (public and private) will buy at the approved NHI prices and this is how the health department works now,” he said. “The provincial health departments do the buying and storing, etc.”

He stressed that the Fund will not go on tender for healthcare providers. “The bill in s39 says that providers will be accredited and all accredited providers will be paid for the benefits that they deliver. So, it is intended to not be exclusionary.”

On the implications of the Public Procurement Bill for the NHI Bill, he told Spotlight the department is still studying the procurement bill and these issues (as raised in the RHAP report and through various stakeholders) are being considered. He also noted that according to the NHI Bill, “If any other law, except the Constitution or PFMA, conflicts with the NHI Bill then the NHI bill prevails. But we will want to engage with the intentions, merits, and any potential challenges with Treasury,” he said.

Have your say

Members of the public have until 15 September to make written submissions on the version of the NHI Bill currently before the NCOP. Meanwhile, National Treasury this week briefed MPs in the Standing Committee on Finance on the Public Procurement Bill. The deadline for written submissions is 11 September.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Mental HealthTags :

Analysis: SA’s New Mental Health Plan and the Problem of Stigma

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Alex Green on Pexels

By Nthusang Lefafa for Spotlight

Before being diagnosed with bipolar disorder Type 1, Sifiso Mkhasibe says he was often labelled as the “black sheep” of the family and he did not know where to go for help. He was often dismissed as crazy and told that this is a white man’s illness.

“My immediate family did not know how to help or support me,” he says. “I was always labelled the black sheep of my family. I was told that I was crazy, bewitched and that I was just pretending to be sick. I was told to be strong and to get over myself and that this disease is a white man’s illness and black people do not have such things.”

Mkhasibe says his family thought it was a cultural thing and that he had an ancestral calling to become a traditional healer. He did not agree.

The South African Federation of Mental Health (SAFMH) defines stigma as “an attribute, quality, or condition that severely restricts or diminishes a person’s sense of self, damaging their self-worth, social connections, and sense of belonging”.

The challenge of getting help

“It was extremely challenging to get help and support from my family. They played a big role in stigmatising me,” Mkhasibe tells Spotlight.

A delay in accessing mental healthcare services led to Mkhasibe’s condition deteriorating. He says some of his symptoms were racing thoughts, impulsive spending, hearing voices, and insomnia. “I was always high on life with extreme energy levels. Things became worse, whereby I became violent and aggressive. I was eventually admitted to Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital in 2007 and later transferred to Sterkfontein Psychiatric Hospital in Krugersdorp.”

“I was never informed about my diagnosis. What it was and how to manage it. I had no idea what to do when I was diagnosed. The challenge was that I was not educated about my mental illness,” he says.

Mkhasibe says he was in Sterkfontein Hospital until 2011. By then, he was estranged from his family and moved around a lot staying with cousins, aunts, and his late grandmother.

“I was at Sterkfontein for four years. My family did not want me back home. I moved from one ward to the other during that time. Now I’m close to my sister and mother again but it took a while to mend those bridges.”

He says his experience with the illness prompted him in 2011 after he was discharged from hospital, to start volunteering and creating awareness on mental health conditions. Mkhasibe is now 39 years old and was until recently a project leader for mental health at the SAFMH. He started at the organisation in 2017. On leaving the organisation, he says he has learned a lot but now has a newborn son and wants to spend time with him. Mkhasibe describes himself as a family man. He is married and has two children.

Stigma and seeking care

Ashleigh Craig, a clinical psychologist who runs a Johannesburg-based private practice and has also worked in the public sector, says beliefs around mental health contribute to stigma because there are negative connotations surrounding mental illness.

“People seeking care are often called names such as bewitched or crazy. This prevents people from seeking out care,” says Craig. “This results in people seeking care when their condition is acute and recovery will take much longer. Stigma can often lead to people completely stopping to take treatment.”

Claire Hart, a post-doctoral fellow at Wits University’s Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit (DPHRU), says the label of any mental illness is often also associated with a mark of social disgrace or stigma. This has been shown in South African communities, where studies revealed high levels of stigmatisation towards individuals with mental disorders. The label of having a “mental illness” is socially stigmatised and constitutes negative external perceptions, which may, in turn, be internalised and negatively impact an individual’s internal sense of self.

“As a result, these individuals may avoid using existing mental health care services in fear of being labelled even when experiencing severe psychological distress. Thus, both having a mental illness and seeking help may be viewed as undesirable,” says Hart.

Under-funded, under-resourced

Hart says fighting stigma requires a two-fold approach that involves education and providing adequate resources. “People with a lived experience can help in terms of fighting mental health stigma and raising awareness. However, mental health is underfunded and there is a shortage of psychologists in the country. To become a registered psychologist, you need a Masters degree and most universities only take six to 12 Masters candidates per year,” says Hart.

Craig says people in the public sector can wait up to four months just to see a psychologist. She says private psychologists are very expensive and in the public sector most mental health services are only available at tertiary hospitals.

According to South Africa’s new National Mental Health Policy Framework and Strategic Plan 2023 – 2030 (the mental health framework,) the country has less than one psychologist for every 100 000 people. This is among the reasons why there are limited mental health services in the public health sector, especially in rural areas.

“At present, mental healthcare in rural areas, preventive and promotive aspects of mental health, and the provision of services to children, adolescents and those with anxiety, mood, and other non-psychotic disorders remain under-resourced and underdeveloped. Furthermore, primary healthcare workers are under considerable strain due to high caseloads and have minimal training in mental health, resulting in patients receiving inadequate mental health care,” says Hart.

The social and economic costs

Data in the mental health framework indicates that about 5% of the total public health budget was allocated to public mental health expenditure in 2016/2017. Provincial public health budget allocations towards mental health showed marked inequality, ranging from 2.1 to 7.7% across provinces.

According to the mental health framework, social costs of mental illness can include disrupted families and social networks, stigma, discrimination, loss of future opportunities, marginalisation, and decreased quality of life.

Mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety have been estimated to cost the economy more than R61.2 billion in lost earnings, according to the mental health framework. It states that at a societal level, lost income associated with mental illness far exceeds public sector expenditure on mental health care. In other words, it costs South Africa more to not treat mental illness than to treat it.

What to do?

Although the mental health framework goes to great lengths to stress the impact of stigma on mental health, its plans to address this are relatively low in detail. According to the framework, all health staff working in health settings will receive basic mental health training, inclusive of anti-stigma training, and ongoing routine supervision and mentoring. Provincial departments of health are meant to look at expanding their mental health workforce.

The framework also sets out to strengthen mental health promotion, prevention and advocacy. “Currently, however, no concerted national programme exists,” the framework states. “In 2024, a national public education programme for mental health will be established, including knowledge of mental health and illness; stigma and discrimination against people with lived experience of mental illness.” This, according to the policy framework, will be steered by the national health department and provincial health departments. Other relevant government departments, including Employment and Labour, Education, and Social Development will, among others, introduce mental health literacy programmes into curriculums or workplace policies and decrease stigma.

But according to Michel’le Donnelly, a project leader for advocacy and awareness at the SAFMH, there is no clear outline for any anti-stigma programming in the mental health policy framework. “As the SAFMH we hold the view that the South African government needs to actively ensure that there is sufficient funding targeted for anti-stigma programming. Monitoring, evaluation, and implementation of these programmes should be done in collaboration with people with lived experience of mental health conditions and NGOs working in the sector. These programmes should include contact-based education as part of governments intended activities because, through evidence and research, this has proven to be a way of ending stigma.”

Mkhasibe agrees that we need more support to make people aware of mental health services and how to fight stigma. ”We need more community engagement in terms of mental health education and awareness. People all over South Africa need to know that mental health is more prevalent than we think. Businesses and organisations need to instil mental health training as a culture in the office,” he says.

“Schools, colleges, and universities should make mental health a priority within education. Awareness campaigns should be done at churches, malls, taxi ranks, airports, and bus stations. Basically, everywhere where people gather,” he says.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : HospitalsTags :

Mixed Responses to Gauteng Health’s Latest Security Plans

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Maxim Hopman on Unsplash

By Thabo Molelekwa for Spotlight

Following reports of healthcare workers who have been bitten, punched, hit in the face, robbed, assaulted, or even killed in healthcare facilities in Gauteng, the province’s health department announced that healthcare workers will now be trained in handling patients who become violent.

The initiative was recently announced by Motalatale Modiba, spokesperson for the Gauteng Department of Health, on social media.

A lack of security at public healthcare facilities is not a new problem. A previous series of Spotlight articles highlighted security challenges in public health facilities in several provinces – including Gauteng – and reports of robberies and assaults at some facilities. Last year, there was a fatal shooting of a nurse at Tembisa Hospital which sparked an outcry among health worker unions over the safety of their members.

The departments’ announcement prompted questions by organised labour and an opposition politician about whether the authorities have lost trust in the multi-million rand security measures already in place in health facilities to protect both workers and patients, with some arguing that security guards, rather than healthcare workers, should be responsible for safety.

However, according to Modiba, the training of staff has nothing to do with the security contracts of security companies.

“Security personnel are non-medical personnel, therefore, their presence in facilities does not substitute the need to ensure that our staff is empowered with techniques to know how to handle difficult patients,” he told Spotlight.

‘Just a tick-box exercise’

The training plans, however, have inspired little confidence among healthcare workers.

According to the nurses’ union Denosa’s Gauteng Provincial Secretary, Bongani Mazibuko, the training does not address the safety concerns that exist in the facilities. “It’s just a tick-box exercise to say the employer is trying to do something. The root cause of these attacks is the influx of mental health patients and the mixing of mental health patients with medical patients,” he told Spotlight.

The department in a statement in April said many of the incidents were reported at Weskoppies Psychiatric Hospital with 21 cases since January last year. At Carletonville Hospital there were nine safety incidents, nine incidents at the Far East Rand Hospital, seven at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, four at Thelle Mogoerane Hospital, and three at Kopanong Hospital. There were also reports of some isolated incidents at other facilities.

Mazibuko said that from the reports they received from their members working in Gauteng public health facilities, the training has also not yet taken place. “We would like the department to tell us which institutions they have provided the training to so that we can confirm with our members if they received the training or not.”

Modiba, however, did not respond to Spotlight’s questions about where training had taken place so far, how many healthcare workers have been trained, or the impact this is having.

Explaining aspects of the plan, however, Modiba said that the department training staff to know how to protect themselves is a practical step that shows that they are conscious of the environment they operate in. According to him, training on how to manage a violent mental healthcare user is generic to the training of doctors and psychiatric nurses as regulated by the Health Professions Council of South Africa, which is a statutory body established in terms of the Health Professions Act. “A special course on management of violent mental healthcare users is planned to be rolled out from the second quarter of the 2023-2024 financial year. It is based on a similar course attended by one of the healthcare workers in the UK. He will be working in one of our Specialist Psychiatric hospitals, Sterkfontein Hospital. He will be the main facilitator and will be working with other employees from the Regional Training Centres, the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC), and Wellness Practitioners,” said Modiba. He said the department is also working with the police.

But Mazibuko said Denosa has had many talks with the department on healthcare workers’ safety concerns and the need to create a safe working environment. “This was part of our demands when we marched last year. Even on International Nurses Day, we were vocal about our concerns about the safety of our members at the workplace.”

He said the union had previously presented its safety campaign to the department.

SAMA ‘deeply concerned’

Meanwhile, following a scoping review study, the South African Medical Association (SAMA) recently published a report outlining the nature and extent of violence against healthcare workers between 2012 and 2022. The study found an increase in violent acts targeting healthcare workers, with the most affected being doctors, nurses, and paramedics. The study found that female healthcare workers were disproportionately affected compared to their male counterparts and most of the incidents were reported in Gauteng.

In an interview with Spotlight, SAMA Chairperson Dr Mvuyisi Mzukwa said they are “deeply concerned” about the safety of healthcare professionals. He said they appreciate efforts that can realistically improve the safety of healthcare workers in the workplace.

“SAMA has shared an interim report [based on the study findings] on violence targeting healthcare workers with DENOSA and the media. This report was designed to sensitise all stakeholders about crime targeting healthcare workers and to prime the stakeholders, including the National Department of Health, to initiate intersectoral solutions to limit and prevent safety threats in the workplace against all healthcare workers in the country,” Mzukwa said.

SAMA’s report found eight murders of healthcare workers reported in the media, “with six of the deaths (or 75%) occurring among doctors”. One nurse and one paramedic were also murdered in the set period the report found. “Of all the 45 media reports examined, only 17 arrests (38%) were reported, with only two resulting in successful prosecution.”

According to Mzukwa, SAMA had recommended that a multi-sectorial strategy for the security of healthcare workers to protect them from targeted crime be developed and implemented.

“Without this intervention, healthcare in itself continues being further jeopardised and more doctors will feel threatened and seek safer refuge in foreign countries, taking with them critical skills and expertise that are in dire need locally. Law enforcement agencies should also act swiftly in dealing with crime and to ensure the safety of both patients and healthcare providers,” Mzukwa said.

61 safety incidents

Speaking in the Gauteng Legislature in April, MEC for Health and Wellness, Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko said there were 61 incidents reported in health facilities between January 2022 and April 2023. She told MPLs that most of these incidents were attributed to mental healthcare users, while others relate to patients’ anger towards staff for various reasons, such as refusal to buy them items or patients trying to escape, as well as angry relatives and patients linked to criminal activities.

Nkomo-Ralehoko said that staff training in responding to aggression and violence in the affected institutions is one element of their intervention. She said the department will be installing CCTV cameras at strategic locations for monitoring purposes.

“Our goal is to minimise – if not eradicate – such incidents in our facilities. We have to work with healthcare workers and other stakeholders such as hospital boards, clinic committees, and the patients themselves to curb incidents of attacks inside our facilities,” she said.

But security concerns in Gauteng’s public health facilities are also fuelled by systemic and contract management issues – something the MEC vowed to address. In March, responding to concerns over these multi-million rand security contracts that are rolled over year on year without a proper tender, Nkomo-Ralehoko acknowledged that the situation is unacceptable. The department is spending over R59 million on month-to-month security contracts at its facilities.

“The security contracts are rolled over irregularly as there is currently no contract in place; only service level agreements are used to manage the contracts,” she said.

Responding to a question from Spotlight on the progress with the new security tender, Modiba said that the tender was advertised and has since closed. “The evaluation committee has been appointed and will now go through the evaluation process to assess the various bids that have been received. We are still on course to complete the process within this financial year,” Modiba said.

But according to Denosa’s Mazibuko, in-sourcing security services, separating mental health patients from other patients, and ensuring that mental health patients are only admitted to where the institutions can commit them, will help the department and the healthcare workers work in a safe space.

He said that the fact that there have been years of year-on-year security contracts, shows that the department is not in touch with the challenges on the ground. “In-sourcing of security will help as well since it will address the issue of security withholding their services as they have not been paid and security being given proper gear for work,” he said.

According to Jack Bloom, the Democratic Alliance’s health spokesperson in Gauteng, the department is failing in its basic responsibility to provide a safe working environment for staff and patients in public hospitals.

“A huge amount of money is spent on security companies that don’t do their job, and it is high time that new security contracts are awarded to competent providers,” he said.

Bloom said that healthcare providers should not have to defend themselves against attacks because that is what security guards are supposed to do. “There needs to be a complete overhaul of security arrangements at our hospitals, with a professional assessment of what should be provided at a reasonable cost,” he said.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons Licence.

Source: Spotlight