Fifth-year Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery (MBChB) student Moses Malebana’s stellar academic record has paved the way for a special international elective at the University of Graz – making him the maiden recipient of this golden opportunity – and galvanising ties between the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) Department of Medicine and the Medical University of Graz (Med Uni Graz) in Austria.
Malebana will depart in November and return to UCT’s Faculty of Health Sciences in January 2024. And with just a few short weeks before he boards his flight, he said he is excited for what awaits, and plans to absorb every detail of the experience.
“I plan on becoming a giant sponge while there. I am excited and feel privileged that I’ve been selected for this opportunity. I look forward to learning all there is to learn and flying UCT’s and the Department of Medicine’s flag[s] high at Med Uni Graz,” he said.
Tough grind
But this opportunity didn’t just fall into his lap. To be considered for the elective abroad, the application and selection criteria was clear – the candidate needed to prove an unmatched academic record. Each applicant was also tasked with supplying a motivational letter that highlighted why they felt they deserved the opportunity. It’s safe to say that Malebana passed the test with flying colours.
He said he used the motivational letter to reflect and relay personal anecdotes that focused on the sacrifices that led him to study medicine at UCT, and he enjoyed documenting his story.
“I remember seeing the email and thinking that this is my opportunity to reflect on my journey and to just tell my story. It was interesting because I don’t often reflect on things. But when I started, I realised that my whole life up to this point was about making the most of the opportunities that have come my way,” he said.
First-class motivation
In his motivation, Malebana touched on the events in his life that moulded him into the man he is today. And the list is endless – walking for more than an hour to and from school every day in rural Limpopo, contending with a lack of in-school resources, and a shortage of skilled teachers were just some of the challenges he experienced. These hurdles, he added, provided the impetus he needed to give his high school education and his medical studies his all.
“All of this taught me resilience; it motivated me to work even harder to reap the rewards later in life. I worked very hard to get to UCT, and now that I’m here, I’m working even harder to attain success in my degree,” he said. “I don’t take any opportunities for granted. I’m humbled that I’ve been chosen to represent the faculty and the university in Austria,” he said.
As he prepares for his big trip, Malebana said he’s looking forward to understanding the Austrian health system and gaining some valuable insight into how medical doctors practice medicine in that country and how it compares to South Africa.
A whole new world
The elective will consist of several rotations in different areas of internal medicine and Malebana will be based at a teaching hospital affiliated to Med Uni Graz. He said he is most excited about his oncology rotations after developing a keen interest in this area of medicine.
“I have always enjoyed studying and learning more about the management of different cancers. So, I really look forward to seeing how things are done in Austria. I know each day will be filled with something new to learn, whether it’s in oncology or a different area of medicine. I’m eager to get going,” he said.
But over and above the work, Malebana said he is thrilled to have the opportunity to travel outside of South Africa’s borders for the first time, to experience diverse cultures and cuisines, gain insight into a new way of life, and build new, lasting friendships.
“It’s going to be an adventure, that’s for sure – one that I’ve already embraced with my arms wide open. I’m grateful that it has come my way,” he said.
The percentage of people living with HIV receiving a three to six-month supply of ARVs at a time in the Free State has dropped from 13% last year to 3% this year, making the province the worst performer in multi-month dispensing of ARVs in the country. This while in Mpumalanga, 64% of people living with HIV receive a three to six-month refill as per national guidelines.
This is according to the latest figures from community-led clinic monitoring group, Ritshidze. In its third Free State report, released on 30 August, the group notes several challenges faced by people living with HIV, key populations that include men who have sex with men and sex workers, among others, and other public healthcare users in the province. Among these are a lack of multi-month dispensing of ARVs and long waiting times at clinics, two factors that can make it harder to take treatment as prescribed.
The report notes that multi-month dispensing often allows people living with HIV to collect their treatment at pick-up points situated at healthcare facilities or externally in the community, making it quicker and easier to collect ARVs. Yet the monitoring data shows that 41% of people using facility pick-up points said they still have to collect files, take vitals, and see a clinician before getting their parcel, which adds to unnecessary delays. “Overall, these shortcomings contribute to slow progress towards getting everyone to start and stay on HIV treatment,” the report states.
Monitoring for the new report was done in April and May this year at 21 facilities and included interviews with 1 095 public healthcare users across four districts in the province. Of the public healthcare users interviewed, 47% (516) were people living with HIV (PLHIV) and 16% (180) were younger than 25.
The recommendations
The report stresses that multi-month dispensing of antiretroviral treatment is just one of several ways to help reduce the burden on the healthcare system, and to reduce the pressure manifesting in long waiting times, overcrowded clinics, and overworked clinic staff. Ritshidze recommends – as it did in its two previous Free State reports – that “the department extends and implements refills up to three months by end of December 2023, and six months by end of September 2024”. It is also recommended that the department, “Ensures that all people living with HIV are offered a range of repeat prescription collection strategy options”, “that facility pick-up points are one-stop very quick ART collection-only, that clinic visits are under 30 minutes and there is no need to go to the clinic registry, collect folders, and to see a clinician.
“Multi-month dispensing and repeat prescription collection strategies can simplify and adapt HIV services across the cascade in ways that both serve the needs of people living with HIV better and reduce unnecessary burdens on the health system,” the report notes.
As people living with HIV often report that healthcare workers send them to the back of the queue when they miss appointments, Ritshidze recommends that staff acknowledge and understand the importance of ART continuity, that it is normal to miss appointments, and that no person living with HIV should be sent to the back of the queue if they miss an appointment as per the welcome back campaign strategy. Ritshidze also recommends that clinics must not require transfer letters to restart or continue with ART and any reports where treatment is delayed by healthcare workers requiring a transfer letter should be urgently investigated and disciplinary action taken where appropriate.
The value of multi-month dispensing
The value of multi-month dispensing is well established. Study findings on the HIV programme in Ethiopia released in May this year, for example, stressed that multi-month dispensing of antiretroviral therapy is “an integral component of differentiated HIV service delivery for people living with HIV”. Ethiopia was the first African country to implement six-month dispensing at scale.
The benefits cited by study participants included “time and cost-savings, fewer work disruptions, reduced stigma due to fewer clinic visits, better medication adherence, and improved overall health”. The perceived health system-level benefits included “improved quality of care, decongested facilities, reduced provider workloads, and improved record-keeping”.
According to Clinical Director at the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society, Camilla Wattrus, requiring people to visit healthcare facilities monthly to collect routine medication, can place a huge strain on the available resources in these facilities.
“Multi-month dispensing for eligible, stable patients on chronic medications, including ARVs can help to alleviate some of this burden, easing up the staff’s available time towards those with acute conditions and unstable patients, says Wattrus.
She says multi-month dispensing is also one way to increase access for stable patients to their medication by reducing potential adherence barriers leading to poor health and loss of income due to transport costs and time away from work – all factors identified by Ritshidze through its monitoring. External pick-up points can also help alleviate congestion at facilities and reduce waiting times.
When asked what the Free State health department can do to improve its performance on multi-month dispensing, Wattrus says establishing clear eligibility criteria will work because not all patients may be suitable. She says that patient education is vital so that they understand the importance of adherence.
“Knowing how to take and store medication, knowing where and when to collect medication, when to return for appointments, and understanding that they can return to the facility at any time they feel unwell or in the case of an emergency is very important. Adequate supply chain management to ensure an uninterrupted supply of medication along with accurate record-keeping and communication is vital,” she says. “Pharmacists, prescribers, and other staff members involved must also be adequately trained on how to deliver multi-month dispensing.”
Wattrus says in order for the Free State to do well, there needs to be an improved supply chain management system, adequate training for all involved staff, and a well-functioning pick-up point system implemented.
The reality on the ground
However, founder of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) organisation, Free State Rainbow Seeds, Thabiso Chaka says the Free State can do better in expanding external pickup points. “Once a person has shown interest and is also adhering to their medication, it is a bonus to say now you don’t have to come to the facility every month and every day. You can come after every three to six months. “I believe it is a good strategy to ensure that people adhere to their treatment. The reason why the Free State is doing poorly is because there is also not enough treatment viral load literacy and this creates a serious challenge and the level of care is often compromised because facilities are congested,” says Chaka.
“As the Free State Rainbow seed, we also want to become a CCMD point where we can be able to issue three to six months because by so doing our people will be comfortable.” CCMD (Central Chronic Medicines Dispensing and Distribution) is a government programme that enables stable patients to collect chronic medicines dispensed centrally from designated pick-up points. Chaka says multi-month dispensing of ARVs “is a good approach to limit issues of defaulting because the stigma attached to HIV-positive people is still there”.
According to Judy Mokoena from the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) in the Free State, there are many reasons why the provincial department is struggling with multi-month dispensing of ARVs.
“The first one is that most facility managers and pharmacists order medication too late. Another reason is that they do not have an actual database of people living with HIV who come to their facilities. What I have noticed is that most people in the province still receive their medication inside the facilities. As TAC, we have been emphasising the issue of giving patients a supply of three to six months, but they are failing dismally,” she says. “Every year we ask the same questions when it comes to the multi-month dispensing, but there has not been a clear answer from government.”
“ARV shortage and ARV theft also play a role and could be another reason why the government is struggling to provide three to six months’ supply,” says Mokoena. “In the past, we have had challenges of stockouts in the Free State.”
Reporting of gun crime in South Africa is wildly inaccurate, work by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) suggests. This is because the official death notification form does not distinguish between gun deaths from accidents and gun deaths from homicide.
The SAMRC has called on the government to update the country’s official death notification form. In a September 2023 South African Medical Journal (SAMJ) editorial, researchers and scientists Pam Groenewald, Richard Matzopoulos, Estevão Afonso and Debbie Bradshaw, say the form does not comply with international standards. While the World Health Organisation recommends reporting manner of death on the medical certificate for cause of death, South Africa’s form does not allow this, they say.
As a result, South Africa does not have accurate information on injury statistics, says Groenewald, a specialist scientist at SAMRC.
“Given that South Africa has got a really high injury burden, this is really not acceptable,” she said.
The SAMRC has pointed out that accurate, timely mortality data for natural and non-natural deaths is especially important after the Covid pandemic.
In a press release, the SAMRC said natural deaths had spiked during Covid waves, while injuries had fallen during government-imposed lockdowns and alcohol sales bans. “Of particular concern is the significant impact of alcohol bans on injury-related deaths,” the council said.
The release also said the statistics are necessary to develop and monitor programs to reduce injuries and violence, and track Sustainable Development Goals of road traffic injury reduction, gender equality and reducing violence-related death rates.
South Africa’s official mortality statistics overestimate accidental injuries and underestimate homicides, transport and suicide deaths, according to a research report also published in the September 2023 SAMJ.
In official death notification form data from Stats SA for 2017, nearly 99% of firearm deaths were classified as accidental and only 1% as homicide. But the SAMRC’s National Cause-of-Death Validation Project (NCoDV) found more than 88% of firearm deaths were homicide, and its Injury Mortality Survey (IMS) found more than 93%.
Similar differences occurred for suicides. Only 0.3% of firearm deaths were recorded as suicide in the 2017 Stats SA data, but they were recorded as 7% in NCoDV and IMS data.
The research report says NCoDV and IMS provide more detailed and consistent data on causes of injury than the death notification form, but they are costly and time-consuming, and not feasible for routine surveillance.
“It costs a lot of money, when we could be getting this data in with every death certificate that gets completed,” Groenewald says.
She says the SAMRC has been asking for an updated death certificate form since 2012.
No annual mortality report since 2018
Also, Stats SA has not published an updated mortality report since the pandemic. The last official report was released in 2021 for the year 2018.
“We’ve got no cause-of-death data at all, not just injuries, nothing. We haven’t seen a death certificate from during the Covid period; we don’t know what doctors have reported,” she said. “It’s mind boggling.”
Felicia Sithole, deputy director of media relations for Stats SA, said in a statement that the Mortality and Causes of Death report had been delayed by a backlog of processing death notification forms as a result of the Covid lockdown, and because of Census 2022 work.
Sithole said Stats SA is committed to publishing the 2019 and 2020 Mortality and Causes of Death reports by the end of March 2024.
“Stats SA fully comprehends the importance of the Mortality and Causes of Death release, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic, and acknowledges that our data must conform to international standards,” she said.
The SAMRC report also calls for the dormant National Forensic Pathology Services Committee to be reactivated. This would help improve data quality, the report says. The committee, established in 2014, has been inactive since 2018/9.
Foster Mohale, a media officer for the Department of Health, said the Minister of Health is in the process of appointing a new National Forensic Pathology Services Committee.
The Department of Home Affairs had not responded to requests for comment at the time of publication.
The healthcare industry is in the midst of a digital revolution. We are witnessing a growth in healthcare consumerism, where patients and consumers are more active and engaged, keen to track their own health and are more understanding of their body. Digital therapeutics are emerging and disruptive technologies that overcome the limitations of place, time, and availability of healthcare resources in South Africa.
Digital therapeutics is the key to shifting from reactive healthcare to proactive holistic care. By leveraging technologies such as artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML), augmented reality/virtual reality (AR/VR), m-health applications, and gamified platforms, these software driven intelligent solutions empower patients and healthcare providers with high-quality, safe, and effective data based interventions.
Christo Groenewald, CEO of CompuGroup Medical South Africa, a MedTech company that has spent over 20 years researching and providing tools doctors, dentists and medical professionals worldwide, has identified two key stages during the interaction between a patient and the healthcare professional, where digital platforms can build a more efficient relationship.
STEP ONE: Keeping accurate records
From the first call or appointment, preferably through an online booking system, being able to quickly capture data and access these records saves time and helps gain a deeper understanding of the patient’s experience. This also helps practitioners make informed decisions about the necessary treatment.
Clinical documentation can effortlessly be facilitated through the employment of systems such as SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, and plan) or SINSS (severity, irritability, nature, stage, and stability) model, further complemented by user-friendly aids for methodical body chart completion.
Should a referral be necessary, the uniformity of the anatomy chart and notes make it easy for colleagues to understand the consulting history and it can be shared with the patient on request or their medical aid.
STEP TWO: Real time imaging
The future of medicine must include integration with diagnostic imaging, which currently often involves multiple departments and hard copies such as x-rays and scans. One digital therapeutics feature that is gaining popularity, especially in sports medicine, is the capacity to visually map pain and musculoskeletal concerns on an interactive 360-degree model of the human body, enhancing diagnostic precision and patient comprehension.
This visual system also helps with virtual consulting, requesting blood work from the labs or writing e-scripts, which is increasingly being done and recorded remotely.
Software programmes, such as Practice Perfect by CGM, are now trusted for their capability to easily capture comprehensive medical and treatment histories right at the point of care. This sleek approach facilitates efficient tracking of patient rehabilitation, fitness progress, and treatment responses. The ability to merge personal and clinical data in real time, paints a portrait of each patient’s physical health, empowering accurate diagnoses, prognosis and subsequent follow-ups.
Constantly evolving
Top multinational MedTech companies have invested heavily in the development and advancement of their platforms so that they can be used to predict and manage a patient’s future health rather than reacting to symptoms. This will help reduce the disease burden and be a cost saving for insurance providers and private and public health sectors and empower patients to take control of their physical wellbeing.
Dr Roberto Beffa, a Cape Town based chiropractor states that “As a loyal customer of CGM for more than a decade, I can confidently say that their Perfect Pair solution has truly helped shape my practice. The seamless integration of clinical notes and billing information in one user-friendly platform has transformed our operations, making the flow from clinical documentation to billing a breeze. Thanks to this efficient system, I can now dedicate more time to what I am truly passionate about – providing exceptional care to my patients”.
For more information about CGM’s Perfect Pair, which is a combination of Practice Perfect plus the powerful billing engine for physical health practitioners, CGM MEDEDI, visit www.cgm.com/za.
Recently, in a major feat for transparency and accountability, the North Gauteng High Court ordered that the public must have access to COVID-19 procurement contracts – details of which, until now, have been kept away from the public eye as the government cited confidentiality clauses.
The Health Justice Initiative’s – who brought the court application – victory is a crucial one given the staggering size of public procurement contracts in the health sector.
According to Zukiswa Kota, South African Programme Head at the Public Service Accountability Monitor (PSAM), this judgement deserves celebrating “as it deepens the case for transparency in public procurement and effectively challenges the many reasons often used to evade publication”. “Ultimately, what we need is proactive disclosure that is built into procurement legislation and – more importantly – is adhered to by government,” said Kota.
“It is inconceivable,” she said, “that in 2023 there continues to be limited transparency around fairly basic info – in this case COVID-19 vaccines. “The fact that there is no explicit transparency is an indictment and something we need to reflect on.”
The need for transparency has also been affirmed in the HJI judgement. “Non-disclosure of any of the records sought means that a shroud of secrecy is placed over the entire negotiation, procurement, and payment process – the very mischief our Constitution and legislation such as Paia seeks to address,” the judgement states. S217 of the Constitution states that public procurement by any state organ must be “in accordance with a system which is fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective”.
The case for transparency
The call for open contracting and to strengthen public procurement legislation is not a new one. It is also not confined to COVID-19 vaccines, but all public procurement, also in the health sector.
Dominic Brown, director at the Alternative Information & Development Centre (AIDC), also recently during a webinar on the launch of a report on pending legislative and regulatory changes in the healthcare sector made the case for transparent procurement. The Rural Health Advocacy Project compiled the report that also provides several recommendations for procurement reforms.
“The level of public procurement in the country is approximately 25% of GDP and the majority of government’s involvement in the economy is through this procurement, so it’s no small issue. It’s of extreme significance,” said Brown.
He said that in 2016, the former chief procurement officer in National Treasury estimated that between 30 to 40% of the country’s procurement budget is lost to inflated prices and fraud by the private sector. At the time, this amounted to R230 billion.
“At the moment, our procurement budget is about R1 trillion, which means that we are losing between R300 and R400 billion each year as a result of corruption linked to public procurement and this has major detrimental impacts on service delivery.”
Putting this impact into perspective, especially as it pertains to the health sector, RHAP’s director, Russel Rensburg during the same webinar said that provinces can spend up to 30% of their health budgets on the procurement of goods and services, which can run into billions. “Contrast this with the huge chunk spent on employee costs (often between 60 and 65% of health budgets), and growing inefficiencies and waste due to non-compliance to legislative prescripts – the pool of money remaining for health services is limited,” he said.
“Lack of compliance with financial management policies, particularly around supply chain monitoring policies, has resulted in the deterioration of several financial management indicators. We’ve seen an increase in qualified audit opinions of health departments and an increase in irregular and wasteful expenditure – amounting to R6 billion in the last financial year,” said Rensburg. “Competent financial management is essential to ensuring that maximum value is achieved from the resources deployed.”
The need for this “competent financial management” in the public sector was highlighted again last week when the Gauteng Department of Health’s Annual Report for 2022/23 was tabled in the provincial legislature. The report showed irregular expenditure to the value of over R2 billion, which means legislative prescripts were not followed in the procurement of goods and services, among others. In the Auditor-General’s (AG) report, she flagged the irregular expenditure stating that there were no effective and appropriate steps taken to prevent it. “The majority of this irregular expenditure,” the AG stated, “was caused by the department’s failure to invite competitive bids” when procuring goods and services.
Legislative reforms and procurement
Currently, in Parliament’s National Assembly, MPs are set to deliberate on the Public Procurement Bill. The bill provides for far-reaching reforms in public procurement. In Parliament’s National Council of Provinces, deliberations on the National Health Insurance Bill are underway. This bill also provides for far-reaching reforms to how health services will be structured and funded.
Both pieces of legislation have major implications for procurement in the health sector.
Yet, with these legislative reforms underway in Parliament, some stakeholders say that neither bill in its current form, will be a silver bullet to address all shortcomings in public procurement in the health sector. Questions also remain if these bills will ultimately result in real consequences for errant public officials in supply chain management or overreaching political office bearers.
Added to this is the overlap between provisions in the two bills, several provisions that lack clarity, and some areas of conflict between the bills that may lead to confusion down the line.
The case for alignment between the bills
The Public Procurement Bill aims to standardise and create a uniform regulatory framework for all procurement by government departments and entities. The NHI Bill, in turn, if passed will transform how publicly-funded health services are organised and delivered. The bill provides for a NHI Fund that will “strategically purchase healthcare services on behalf of users”.
Rensburg explains this fund must transfer funds directly to accredited and contracted central, provincial, regional, specialised and district hospitals based on a global budget or Diagnosis-related Groups. The bill also provides for an Office of Health Products Procurement (OHPP), he said, but the exact scope of this office’s mandate is not yet clear.
According to the bill, this office (OHPP) will be responsible for “the centralised facilitation and coordination of functions related to the public procurement of health-related products”.
According to Yana van Leeve, from the law firm ENSafrica, the NHI fund will be a S3A public entity so the procurement bill will apply to that entity. S3A public entities under the Public Finance Management Act can be defined as a public entity with the mandate to fulfil a specific economic or social responsibility of government and they depend on government funding and public money.
Van Leeve was also a panellist during the RHAP webinar.
She explained that section 217 of the Constitution will also apply to this process of acquiring services because the NHI Fund will be engaging in public procurement when it engages healthcare service providers and health establishments in both the public and private sectors. Van Leeve said that it is not clear in the NHI Bill, however, that “there is an appreciation that this dimension of the scheme will amount to formal procurement and will thus be subject to normal procurement law”. “The implication would then be that one of the prescribed forms of procurement, for example, quotations or open bidding must be used to secure the services of these health service providers.” According to her, the NHI Bill, however, creates the impression that there is a different type of arrangement to be considered for the acquiring of such services. In section 39 of the NHI Bill, for example, accreditation of health service providers is required.
The procurement bill, in turn, provides for a Public Procurement Office that must create and maintain a database of prospective suppliers. Departments or other public entities may only procure from suppliers listed in this database. This may result in some practical problems as the requirements to be added to the existing central supplier database of National Treasury may differ from what the NHI Bill requires from suppliers. For example, to get on the database, National Treasury may consider a legitimate entity as one with a valid tax certificate, but, said van Leeve, “If you are procuring health products, for example, you may need other things to accredit a potential supplier, which treasury does not necessarily look at when it builds its database”.
“So, immediately you can see there will be tension between what the NHI envisage for creating its services and products lists versus what the public procurement office will develop in terms of the national supplier database. So, on the one hand, NHI is creating a special procurement system for health and providing for units and committees that will be responsible for identifying health services and buying health products and it’s not clear how these two pieces of legislation are going to interact.”
Van Leeve did say, however, that it is possible that the Minister of Finance “can differentiate between institutions and categories of procurement, but nothing in the procurement bill currently requires the minister to do so and there is no guidance on the considerations relevant to differentiating between categories of public institutions”.
She said it is possible for the bill to still make clear provision for the minister to make exemptions from the procurement bill. Currently, section 56(b) of the bill, for example, only provides – “the Minister may, with or without conditions, by notice in the Gazette, exempt a procuring institution from any provision of this Act, if— (a) national security could reasonably be expected to be compromised, or (b) the procurement is to be funded partially or in full by donor or grant funding and such exemption will benefit the public in general or a section of the public”.
But van Leeve insists that one way or the other, “It will be important – certainly in the way in which the NHI and procurement bills become operationalised for there to be comity between the bills.”
The RHAP report also recommends that “the relationship between health authorities and the public procurement structures proposed in the draft Public Procurement Bill must be clarified. The Public Procurement Bill makes no specific reference to health procurement as a special type of public procurement. At the same time, the NHI Bill contemplates a very particular regime in respect of health procurement. These two draft Bills will have to be aligned.”
According to the report, “the tension between the decentralised nature of public finance management in South Africa under the PFMA and Municipal Finance Management Act on the one hand and the highly centralised nature of public health services spending under the proposed NHI on the other hand, will have to be addressed”.
The shadow of politics
There are also other considerations besides overlapping provisions in the two bills – the shadow of politics through the blurring of the administrative and political interface often becomes a problem.
Rensburg highlighted, among others, it is still not clear how compliance with procurement policies will be audited and how often, or what the different sanctions will be for those not complying. “We see, especially with emergency procurement, that managing procurement functions is open to a lot of different kinds of pressures, he said. “The procurement bill does create frameworks for public office bearers to not be involved in the procurement process and for subject matter experts to be involved in procurement decisions, but there are a lot of things happening in the shadow that you can’t explicitly link to involvement of political principles in administrative processes,” said Rensburg.
“There is an added complexity,” Brown said, “when you hear, for example, of ANC tender committees, or when there is a tender chairperson who then can determine who gets and doesn’t get various contracts. This is deeply rooted in the state – from local government all the way up to national level, and across state-owned enterprises.”
Case in point, in the public health sector, the Digital Vibes scandal epitomised this “complexity” when then-Minister of Health, Dr Zweli Mkhize was implicated in tender irregularities and subsequently resigned.
Another criticism of the Public Procurement Bill is that it leaves a lot, arguably too much, of the detail of how procurement will actually work up to regulation rather than setting it down in primary legislation. This, suggested Caroline James and Sam Sole in a recent Daily Maverick article, leaves the door open to political interference.
Corruption Watch’s executive director, Karam Singh, during a different webinar in August on the procurement bill by the Special Interest Group on Public Procurement Law, also flagged some gaps in the definitions in the procurement bill, especially around issues like conflicts of interest and politically exposed persons.
In terms of chapter three of the procurement bill that deals with procurement integrity and prohibition of certain practices and debarment, anybody who is involved in the procurement process – that is from the accounting officer, bid committee, or tribunal – must comply with the prescribed code of conduct, failing which will constitute misconduct. According to Singh, however, the bill falls short of stipulating who must issue the code of conduct, how it would be updated, and where it would work, as well as where or when it must be made available. “There is very little detail on how misconduct would be handled,” he said, “and so there is a gap between understanding what this code of conduct would be, how it would come about and if it will be presented for public participation and public comment.” He said it is also unclear what would be the enforcement mechanism which would stand behind the code of conduct to make it effective.
Responding to concerns over tender corruption risks
In June this year, during a briefing by Dr Nicholas Crisp, Deputy Director-General in the National Health Department on the NHI Bill to MPs in the NCOP, concerns were flagged over the risk of tender corruption in the NHI Fund. Later, in August during a briefing to MPLs in the Western Cape provincial legislature, the same concerns were raised.
At every point, Crisp insisted, “The NHI Fund will handle very little by way of tender. The accreditation is not a tender process. It’s voluntary registration by a service provider – public or private – as long as they meet the criteria. The prices will be fixed and the way services are delivered will be fixed when it comes to the procurement.”
According to Crisp, when it comes to the procurement processes for goods, particularly health products, the NHI Fund is only involved in the first stage. “The Fund would not go about the logistics of purchasing anything. The providers needed to purchase once those prices were set. There was far less vulnerability in the Fund than first thought when one looked at the Bill,” he said.
Spotlight followed up with Crisp for further clarification in lieu of the RHAP report and the implications of the procurement bill for the NHI Bill. Crisp said, that according to the NHI Bill, the Fund will determine the Formulary that it will pay for and will establish the prices of the items in the Formulary. “It is the intention that the NHI agency will not buy any ‘health products’ and will not have storerooms and warehouses since the agency (the NHI Fund) is not a provider of services. The providers will buy what they need to deliver the benefits that they are accredited to provide. Accredited providers (public and private) will buy at the approved NHI prices and this is how the health department works now,” he said. “The provincial health departments do the buying and storing, etc.”
He stressed that the Fund will not go on tender for healthcare providers. “The bill in s39 says that providers will be accredited and all accredited providers will be paid for the benefits that they deliver. So, it is intended to not be exclusionary.”
On the implications of the Public Procurement Bill for the NHI Bill, he told Spotlight the department is still studying the procurement bill and these issues (as raised in the RHAP report and through various stakeholders) are being considered. He also noted that according to the NHI Bill, “If any other law, except the Constitution or PFMA, conflicts with the NHI Bill then the NHI bill prevails. But we will want to engage with the intentions, merits, and any potential challenges with Treasury,” he said.
Have your say
Members of the public have until 15 September to make written submissions on the version of the NHI Bill currently before the NCOP. Meanwhile, National Treasury this week briefed MPs in the Standing Committee on Finance on the Public Procurement Bill. The deadline for written submissions is 11 September.
South African non-profit company, the SA Heart Association’s renowned annual congress will be taking place this year at the Sandton Convention Centre in Johannesburg from 27 – 29 October and will feature unique, hands-on training sessions by some of the world’s leading cardiologists.
The congress, a key event on this year’s health calendar and eponymously dubbed the ‘Cardiac Collaboration’, will boast joint symposia in highly specialised fields such as cardiac anaesthesiology, endocrinology, critical and emergency care, sports medicine, and radiology, to name a few. The aim is to develop future collaboration with other academic societies and create a footprint for cardiologists to work in tandem with them and other special interest groups.
Speaking ahead of the annual congress, unlike any of the 22 preceding events, Cardiologist, Congress Convenor and Wits University lecturer, Dr Farouk Mamdoo, says several internationally renowned cardiologists and opinion leaders, local and global, will hold ‘Training Villages’ offering valuable, hands-on training to delegates. These will be held at times separate to the overarching congress presentations and spread across the three congress days, allowing delegates the chance to interact with international masters, some of whom will be using state-of-the art devices and equipment in these personalised training sessions.
The congress has sparked global interest and attendance is considered essential among cardiologists and related disciplines wanting to update their knowledge and take advantage of the unique collaborative gathering that will have far reaching future clinical and research implications.
The organizers have also taken the stellar expert input one step further. The trend-setting cardiologists will conduct roadshows at major hospitals around the country, both before and after the congress, giving local colleagues an unprecedented opportunity to work on patients with them, whether it be through consultations or surgical procedures. The roadshows will also provide continuity for delegates who attend the Training Villages at the Sandton congress.
Says Mamdoo: “Normally special devices, simulators and equipment are statically displayed on exhibition stands in the conference hall. However, at this year’s congress, delegates will be able to see them being used in real time – some of which this country hasn’t even seen before.”
Mamdoo says additional pre-congress workshops will consist of didactic and practical lectures about hands-on procedures, with ‘tips, tricks and advice,’ and case studies presented. Echocardiography, electrophysiology, paediatric cardiology, and cardiology for non-cardiologists will be among the fields embraced.
“The Training Villages will each have their own agenda with specific key learning topics and a timetable. Delegates can access these via the conference program on our website – and find out where the experts will be during the roadshow,” says Mamdoo.
Some of the top global names in cardiology, many of them local, that will be attending, presenting, and leading workshops at the congress, include: Professor Mark Petri,Cardiologist at the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences at the University of Glasgow; Professor Javed Butler, Patrick H. Lehan Chair in Cardiovascular Research and Chairman of the Department of Medicine at the University of Mississippi; Professor Renato Lopes, Department of Medicine within the Division of Cardiology at Duke University Medical Centre, North Carolina; Dr Seth Worley, Electrophysiology and Interventional Implants, Medstar Heart Vascular Institute in Washinton DC; Dr George McDaniel,Paediatric and Adult Congenital Electrophysiologist, UVA Children’s, Virginia; and Professor Jeroen Bax, Leiden University, Netherlands; Non-invasive imaging.
Among the most cutting-edge developments to be presented will be breakthroughs in heart failure therapy, new ways of treating complex coronary disease plus advances in the latest techniques, technology, and diagnostic tools – and the evidence to support their use.
Local experts presenting at the congress – many of whom are globally recognized – include: Professor Karen Sliwa, clinician-scientist and Director of the Hatter Institute for Cardiovascular Research in Africa at the University of Cape Town (Managing cardio vascular risk factors during pregnancy); Dr Brian Allwood, Consultant Pulmonologist at Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, where he has been responsible for expanding the pulmonary hypertension service and starting the first dedicated post-tuberculosis clinic in the country (Idiopathic pulmonary hypertension); Mpiko Ntsekhe, Cardiology Head of Department at Groote Schuur Hospital (HIV and cardiovascular disease – an update); and Fathima Paruk, Academic and Clinical Head of the Department of Critical Care at the University of Pretoria and Steve Biko Academic Hospital (Navigating social media as a clinician). Case-based plenaries will be a feature of the conference while cardiac Fellows will present their work in separate sessions with prestigious awards for the best abstract and oral presentations, plus a Henley Business School award sponsored by medical scheme, Discovery Health.
Cardiologists from the public sector, particularly registrars, are likely to find the conference particularly rewarding as few will have had the opportunity to work with much of the newer equipment that will be present – or interact with globally recognized expert’s face to face.
Says Mamdoo: “We look forward to hosting this exciting, world-class event with a jam-packed agenda and interacting with each other, celebrating our achievements and collaborating in an inclusive and diverse space with welcome encouragement from our learned peers – and fresh talent from across our beautiful country.”
To view the full congress agenda, access further information and book your place, visit: www.saheartcongress.org
Both the Khoi and the San believed in a mythical animal, resembling a cow, whose horns were thought to have medicinal attributes. This centuries-old medicine horn contained herbal remedies used by the Khoi-san. Credit: Rodger Smith
By Zelna Booth
Traditional medicines are part of the cultural heritage of many Africans. About 80% of the African continent’s population use these medicines for healthcare.
Other reasons include affordability, accessibility, patient dissatisfaction with conventional medicine, and the common misconception that “natural” is “safe”.
The growing recognition of traditional medicine resulted in the first World Health Organization global summit on the topic, in August 2023, with the theme “Health and Wellbeing for All”.
Traditional medicines are widely used in South Africa, with up to 60% of South Africans estimated to be reliant on traditional medicine as a primary source of healthcare.
Conventional South African healthcare facilities struggle to cope with extremely high patient numbers. The failure to meet the basic standards of healthcare, with increasing morbidity and mortality rates, poses a threat to the South African economy.
In my opinion, as a qualified pharmacist and academic with a research focus on traditional medicinal plant use in South Africa, integrating traditional medicine practices into modern healthcare systems can harness centuries of indigenous knowledge, increasing treatment options and provide better healthcare.
Recognition of traditional medicine as an alternative or joint source of healthcare to that of standard, conventional medicine has proven challenging. This is due to the absence of scientific research establishing and documenting the safety and effectiveness of traditional medicines, along with the lack of regulatory controls.
What are traditional medicines?
Traditional medicine encompasses a number of healthcare practices aimed at either preventing or treating acute or chronic complaints through the application of indigenous knowledge, beliefs and approaches. It incorporates the use of plant, animal and mineral-based products. Plant-derived products form the majority of treatment regimens.
Traditional medicine practices also have a place in ritualistic activities and communicating with ancestors.
South Africa is rich in indigenous medicinal fauna and flora, with about 2000 species of plants traded for medicinal purposes. In South Africa the provinces of KwaZulu-Natal, Gauteng, Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga and Limpopo are trading “hotspots”. The harvested plants are most often sold at traditional medicine muthi markets.
Uses of medicinal plants
Medicinal plants most popularly traded in South Africa include buchu, bitter aloe, African wormwood, honeybush, devil’s claw, hoodia, African potato, fever tea, African geranium, African ginger, cancer bush, pepperbark tree, milk bush and the very commonly consumed South African beverage, rooibos tea.
The most commonly traded medicinal plants in South Africa are listed below along with their traditional uses:
Cancer bush – Respiratory tract infections; menstrual pain.
Pepperbark tree – Respiratory tract infections; sexually transmitted infections.
Milk bush – Pain; ulcers; skin conditions.
Rooibos – Inflammation; high cholesterol; high blood pressure.
There are many ways in which traditional medicine may be used. It can be a drop in the eye or the ear, a poultice applied to the skin, a boiled preparation for inhalation or a tea brewed for oral administration.
Roots, bulbs and bark are used most often, and leaves less frequently. Roots are available throughout the year. There’s also a belief that the roots have the strongest concentration of “medicine”. Harvesting of the roots, however, poses concerns about the conservation of these medicinal plants. The South African government, with the draft policy on African traditional medicine Notice 906 of 2008 outlines considerations aimed at ensuring the conservation of these plants through counteracting unsustainable harvesting practises.
Obstacles to traditional medicine use
The limited research investigating interactions posed should a patient be making use of both traditional and conventional medicine is a concern.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients used traditional remedies for the prevention of infection or treatment.
Understanding which traditional medicines are being used and how, their therapeutic effects in the human body, and how they interact with conventional medicines, would help determine safety of their combined use.
Certain combinations may have advantageous interactions, increasing the efficacy or potency of the medicines and allowing for reduced dosages, thereby reducing potential toxicity. These combinations could assist in the development of new pharmaceutical formulations.
Key role players from both systems of healthcare need to be able to share information freely.
The need for policy development is key. Both conventional and traditional medicine practitioners would need to be aware of and engage with patients on all the medicines they are taking.
Understanding the whole patient
Patients often seek treatment from both conventional and traditional sources, which can lead to side effects or duplication in medications.
A comprehensive understanding of a patient’s health profile makes care easier.
This could also prevent treatment failures, promote patient safety, prevent adverse interactions and minimise risks.
A harmonious healthcare landscape would combine the strengths of both systems to provide better healthcare for all.
Zelna Booth, Pharmacist and Academic Lecturer (Pharmacy Practice Division, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of the Witwatersrand), University of the Witwatersrand
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
The furore over claims of fraudulent account manipulation happening at Mediclinic hospitals continues to grow, as the initial whistleblower responded to a challenge for more information by providing a detailed list of of starting points for investigators, according to Daily Maverick.
Widely reported in media outlets such as News24, Radio 702, and eNCA, the initial email alleged that hospital codes were being altered to ones which drew higher remunerations from medical aid schemes and therefore which financially benefitted the hospitals. They further claimed that no action was being taken against employees who were engaging in this practice, which was supposedly happening at six hospitals.
The Council for Medical Schemes noted that hospital charges to beneficiaries had increased by nearly 19% from R7039.74 in 2020 to R8346.40. Just over 92% of the total hospital expenditure was paid to private hospitals.
Greg van Wyk, CEO of Mediclinic Southern Africa, was also emailed among the initial recipients. He responded swiftly, writing in a reply to all the cc’d recipients last week that Mediclinic had appointed Steven Powell, head of law firm ENSafrica’s forensics practice, to head its independent audit.
The Mediclinic CEO also challenged the anonymous whistleblower to come forward and reveal themselves, the whistle-blower then responded with an email cc’d to medical schemes and the media. The email contained extensive of details of the alleged fraud – plenty of information for investigators to get started with.
The whistle-blower told News24 that, for example, “When a patient died in a hospital emergency room, sometimes Mediclinic case managers were expected to change their accounts to reflect an ICU death instead. This is because of the fixed fees associated with emergency room deaths, which are lower than ICU-related fees.”
I walked into a store in Cape Town and I bought a gram of cannabis for R100. With GroundUp’s money. I had my editor’s consent.
The store was small, dimly lit, and lined with a variety of cannabis products in glass jars.
On the table was a stack of medical forms used by a doctor to prescribe cannabis to people for health reasons.
I did not have a doctor’s note. So I complimented the salesman on his luscious black curls. I think it worked because he became very chatty. Let’s call him Bob.
We discussed how the store works and the current laws. He said they’re working in a “grey area”.
There are two ways the store sells cannabis to people, Bob explained.
Method one: the membership system. Bob said that members pay a monthly fee and receive a certain amount of cannabis over a month. He says this gets around the legal problem, which is, he says, that “buying and selling” are not allowed. With the membership system, Bob said, you’re not doing either.
Method two: the medical method. The store uses section 21 of the Medicines Act to facilitate medical sales.
Bob said he was keen for the store to use the medical route for customers during the day and to run a club in the evenings where members come and smoke in a chilled environment.
I explained to Bob that I get quite anxious when I smoke. I can hear myself think with an echo of my thoughts swirling in my brain. (Boring truth be told, I haven’t smoked cannabis in years, and I didn’t smoke what I bought either. I won’t reveal who did.) Bob recommended a specific cannabis for me.
I asked him if he could recommend a doctor so I could get a prescription. Laughing, he said that he was a doctor. I think he was only half-joking, because it seemed like we then used method two: the medical route. He took out a scale and some bright green cannabis. He weighed it, and sold me 1 gram of OG Kush for R100.
Nope, that’s not how the law works
Was Ashraf’s transaction legal? No, according to a lawyer with expertise in the cannabis industry whom we spoke to.
First, the lawyer explained, cannabis can only be produced in a facility licensed by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA). It’s unlikely that the store obtained its cannabis from such a licensed facility. In fact there is a view that even weighing out a small amount of weed from a bag obtained from a licensed cultivator, and then packaging it, is manufacturing.
Second, if Section 21 of the Medicines Act is to be used, the sale of the cannabis can only take place after the doctor has prescribed it and SAHPRA has authorised the sale of weed to that particular patient. (Ashraf didn’t even give Bob his name.)
Even if these two conditions are met, no sale of cannabis to a patient can take place outside of a retail or community pharmacy.
There’s nothing unique about Ashraf’s experience. Dozens of stores across the country are selling cannabis using the same approach. We got the impression that in Durban there isn’t even a pretence of trying to be legal as there is in some of the Cape Town and Johannesburg stores. Our experience in Durban is that you can pretty much walk into stores and simply buy cannabis over the counter without any fuss.
How it got this way
South Africa’s cannabis sector is in limbo five years after the Constitutional Court ruled that cultivation and possession of the plant for private use is legal.
In 1997, Gareth Prince, a practising Rastafarian, applied to the Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope to be admitted as an attorney. The Society rejected his application because he had two criminal convictions for possession of cannabis and he continued to smoke cannabis. Prince argued that the use of cannabis was part of his religion, and that the Law Society’s decision violated his right to religious freedom.
Prince took the decision to court in 1998. But the High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal and Constitutional Court ruled in favour of the Law Society. The Constitutional Court’s 2002 decision was close: five versus four.
After the Constitutional Court’s judgment, Prince and two cannabis activists – Jeremy Acton and Jonathan Ruben – approached the courts again. Instead of focussing solely on religious freedom, their applications challenged provisions of the Drugs Act and Medicines Act that criminalised the use of cannabis on the basis that these provisions violated the right to privacy in section 14 of the Constitution. As these challenges were related, the High Court consolidated the cases.
In 2017, the Western Cape High Court declared the provisions in the Drugs Act and Medicines Act that criminalise private adult use of cannabis unconstitutional. This decision was upheld by the Constitutional Court in 2018. This judgment has become known as Prince 3. But the Constitutional Court did not confirm the High Court order that decriminalised the dealing of cannabis. Parliament was given 24 months to deal with the offending legislation.
In the event that Parliament didn’t fix things within the two-year deadline, the court ruled that its reading-in remedy (which permits the narrow exception for personal use) would become permanent, at least until Parliament amended the law.
Five years later, the slow pace of drafting legislation following the Prince 3 judgment has resulted in a proliferation of businesses using “grey areas” in the wording.
“People are looking for gaps, so these so-called dispensaries are stepping into the market claiming to sell something legal,” explained Andy Gray, chair of the Cannabis Working Group at SAHPRA and a pharmacy lecturer at the University of KwaZulu Natal (UKZN).
Substances that you can ingest are scheduled by SAHPRA from 0 to 8. A schedule 0 substance has very few controls; anyone can sell it without any licence required. At the other end of the scale, a schedule 8 substance is very strictly controlled, it may have some medicinal benefits but also has extremely high potential for abuse. Medical practitioners have to get special permission from SAHRPA for use and prescription of any of these substances.
After the Constitutional Court ruling, SAHPRA lowered the schedules of some of the substances found in cannabis. Low doses of Cannabidiol (CBD), a component of cannabis that isn’t psychoactive, were lowered to schedule 0 in complementary medicine products. But it is unclear if CBD in products such as drinks and gummies, with their varying dosages, manufacturing processes and contents – found in nearly every major shopping outlet – qualify as “complementary medicines”.
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the key psychoactive component of cannabis, was lowered from schedule 7 to schedule 6. But schedule 6 substances are still highly restricted: According to SAHPRA these are medical substances that have “a moderate to high potential for abuse” which necessitates strict control and management of supply, including restrictions on repeat prescriptions and a supply limit of 30 days’ worth.
Danmari Duguid is head of the cannabis department at Schindlers Attorneys who represented Julian Stobbs and Myrtle Clarke, intervening parties in the 2018 Constitutional Court case, Prince 3. She says that the only way you can legally buy cannabis containing THC is through the medical route. This is done using section 21 of the Medicines Act.
Why section 21 of the Medicines Act is important
In a nutshell, this clause is a way for people with particular needs to legally obtain medicines that have not been registered by SAHPRA, but contain scheduled substances. For example, patients with serious cases of lung or skin cancer use Section 21 authorisation to access a medication called nivolumab (branded as Opdivo). SAHPRA has registered a lung and skin cancer medicine called pembrolizumab (branded as Keytruda) but this may not work with every patient.
In the 2000s, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) famously imported a generic version of a drug called fluconazole to treat an illness that particularly affects people with advanced HIV disease. A patented version of the medicine was available in the country but it was extremely expensive. The much more affordable version of the medicine that the TAC imported was not registered in South Africa, so the then Medicines Control Council allowed a doctor working with the TAC to import the medicine for patients using section 21 of the Medicines Act.
But section 21 authorisations are far from a straightforward legal route to using cannabis as explained above.
Hardly any of the cannabis retailers that claim to use the section 21 process are adhering to what’s legally required. It is in theory possible but in practice very hard for small cannabis retailers to do so.
Also, the Cannabis for Private Purposes Bill, currently before Parliament, does not provide for a recreational or adult market.
Gray told GroundUp that he fears people who want to buy and sell recreational cannabis in private will continue to abuse the medical route.
This happened in California in the United States, where the state legalised cannabis through the medicinal route and this led to extensive abuse of the process by patients, doctors and retailers.
The most direct way to combat this abuse is through the introduction of an adult use market, said Gray. This would mean cannabis products would be highly regulated and taxed, similar to alcohol and tobacco. This model could include the “legacy” or “peasant cultivators” who grow cannabis in rural parts of the country, and cannot meet the strict conditions for growing medical grade cannabis, said Gray.
Duguid agrees that the adult use model would work best for the legalisation of recreational cannabis sale and use in the future.
“At the moment you are allowed to brew beer for your own consumption, similar to how you are now allowed to grow cannabis for your own consumption after the 2018 judgement; but the moment you want to retail the product you should need a licence like you do to sell alcohol. This would ensure you meet certain safety standards,” said Duguid.
The Department of Agriculture and Land Reform and the Presidency recently hosted the Phakisa Action Lab in June 2023, which brought together 130 representatives of government and business, religious leaders and legal experts to discuss the legalisation of cannabis and hemp.
The final report from Phakisa emphasised that the government is taking a “science-based and human rights approach” approach to creating and regulating an adult use market, but that the “supply and trade of cannabis to consumers remains illegal”.
The report suggests adding a clause to the Cannabis for Private Purposes Bill which would remove cannabis from the Drugs Act “subject to parliamentary process and approval”.
The report highlights that adult use legalisation must include “the existing historical cultivation of cannabis by indigenous communities and black rural farmers”.
But it does not provide a timeline for doing this.
The Day Hospital Association of South Africa (DHASA) has joined the Hospital Association of South Africa (HASA), the representative organisation of private hospital groups in the country, including Netcare, Mediclinic, Life Healthcare, Lenmed, Joint Medical Holdings, and a range of leading facilities across the country like Zuid-Afrikaans Hospital and Arwyp Medical Centre.
Among the Day Hospital Association of South Africa members are the Advanced Health chain, Cure Day Hospitals, and various leading treatment facilities situated nationwide.
According to HASA Chief Executive Officer Dr Dumisani Bomela, DHASA perspectives on healthcare reform issues, like the National Health Insurance, will contribute to a rich healthcare reform discussion.
He says, “Through HASA, the Day Hospital Association can provide additional critical perspectives that we believe are required in the collaborative approach that we are engaging in with Government to build a strong and accessible healthcare system for all in South Africa. We completely believe that the excellent leadership of DHASA will make full use of their membership in HASA to make their important contribution.”
The Chairman of the Day Hospital Association of South Africa, Raymond Foster, says “We are excited to be associated with HASA. We are confident that HASA will meet the expectations of our members.”
