Tag: SNP

A Quick and Inexpensive Test for Osteoporosis

Photo by Mehmet Turgut Kirkgoz on Unsplash

In osteoporosis, treatment would be most effective with early detection – something not yet possible with current X-ray based osteoporosis diagnostic tests, which lack the requisite sensitivity. Now, researchers reporting in ACS Central Science have developed a biosensor that could someday help identify those most at risk for osteoporosis using less than a drop of blood.

Early intervention is critical to reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with osteoporosis. The most common technique used to measure changes in bone mineral density (BMD) – dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry – is not sensitive enough to detect BMD loss until a significant amount of damage has already occurred. Several genomic studies, however, have reported genetic variations known as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with increased risk for osteoporosis. Using this information, Ciara K. O’Sullivan and colleagues wanted to develop a portable electrochemical device that would allow them to quickly detect five of these SNPs in finger-prick blood samples in a step toward early diagnosis.

The device involves an electrode array to which DNA fragments for each SNP are attached. When lysed whole blood is applied to the array, any DNA matching the SNPs binds the sequences and is amplified with recombinase polymerase that incorporates ferrocene, a label that facilitates electrochemical detection. Using this platform, the researchers detected osteoporosis-associated SNPs in 15 human blood samples, confirming their results with other methods.

As the DNA does not have to be purified from the blood, the analysis can be performed quickly (about 15 minutes) and inexpensively (< $0.5 per SNP). Furthermore, because the equipment and reagents are readily accessible and portable, the researchers say that the device offers great potential for use at point-of-care settings, rather than being limited to a centralised laboratory. The technology is also versatile and can be readily adapted to detect other SNPs, as the researchers showed previously when identifying drug resistance in Tuberculosis mycobacterium from sputum and cardiomyopathy risk from blood. Although the device does not diagnose osteoporosis itself, it might help physicians identify people whom they should monitor more closely.

Source: Chemical Society

Excessive False Positives from SNP Testing in Very Rare Diseases

A widely-used genetic testing technology has a very high rate of false positives for extremely rare genetic diseases, a study has found.

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips are DNA microarrays which test genetic variation at hundreds of thousands of specific genome locations. They were initially developed to study common genetic variations, and are excellent tools for tracing ancestry and aso detecting predisposition to common multifactorial diseases such as type 2 diabetes.

Prompted by accounts of women scheduling surgery because of wrongly being informed they had variations in the BRCA1 gene that could lead to very high risks of breast disease, a team from the University of Exeter set out to test the technology. Using data from 50 000 individuals, they found that the majority of rare disease detections were false.

“SNP chips are fantastic at detecting common genetic variants, yet we have to recognise that tests that perform well in one scenario are not necessarily applicable to others,” said senior author Caroline Wright, Professor in Genomic Medicine at the University of Exeter Medical School. “We’ve confirmed that SNP chips are extremely poor at detecting very rare disease-causing genetic variants, often giving false positive results that can have profound clinical impact. These false results had been used to schedule invasive medical procedures that were both unnecessary and unwarranted.”

The team compared data from the SNP chips to data from the UK Biobank which was sequenced with better technology, plus 21 volunteers sharing their consumer genetic data.

They found a false positive rate of 84% for variants that were 1 in 100 000. From the consumer data, 20 of the 21 had at least one false positive for a disease-causing variation.

Co-author Dr Leigh Jackson, Lecturer in Genomic Medicine at the University of Exeter, said the number of such false positives on SNP chips was “shockingly high.”

“To be clear: a very rare, disease-causing variant detected using a SNP chip is more likely to be wrong than right,” said Dr Jackson. “Although some consumer genomics companies perform sequencing to validate important results before releasing them to consumers, most consumers also download their ‘raw’ SNP chip data for secondary analysis, and this raw data still contain these incorrect results. The implications of our findings are very simple: SNP chips perform poorly for detecting very rare genetic variants and the results should never be used to guide a patient’s medical care, unless they have been validated.”

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: BMJ (2021). www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n214