Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of kidney stones, but some forms of treatment for this condition may also have the benefit of lowering risk of kidney stones. In a study led by investigators from Mass General Brigham, researchers found that there was an association between the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and a lower risk of developing kidney stones. Their findings are reported in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Rates of kidney stones are on the rise in the United States and around the world. Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of kidney stones, but some forms of treatment for this condition may also have the benefit of lowering risk of kidney stones.
The study included data from three nationwide databases of patients with type 2 diabetes who were seen in routine clinical practice.
The team analysed information from 716,406 adults with type 2 diabetes who had started taking an SGLT2 inhibitor or two other classes of diabetes medications known as GLP1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors.
Patients who began taking SGLT2 inhibitors had a 30% lower risk of developing kidney stones than those taking GLP1 agonists and about a 25% lower risk than those taking DPP4 inhibitors.
The findings were consistent across sex, race/ethnicity, history of chronic kidney disease and obesity.
“Our findings could help inform clinical decision making for patients with diabetes who are at risk for developing kidney stones,” said corresponding author Julie Paik, MD, ScD, MPH, of the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics and the Division of Renal (Kidney) Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Julie M. Paik, Helen Tesfaye, Gary C. Curhan, Heidi Zakoul, Deborah J. Wexler, Elisabetta Patorno. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Nephrolithiasis Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2024; DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7660
Newer diabetes medicines do not appear to increase the risk of birth defects. The largest comparative study to date found no increased risk compared to treatment with insulin, which is considered safe during pregnancy. The study was published in JAMA Internal Medicine.
Newer diabetes drugs such as sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors are being increasingly used, both in the treatment of diabetes, but also extended indications for several of the preparations.
However, knowledge of the foetal effects of these drugs is still low, so women with type 2 diabetes are often advised to switch to insulin before a planned pregnancy because it is considered safe. However, not all pregnancies are planned and more and more people are becoming pregnant while being treated with these drugs.
An international research team has now investigated whether the use of these drugs during pregnancy increases the risk of birth defects. The researchers used health data from 3.5 million pregnancies in six different countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland, Iceland, USA and Israel) between 2009 and 2021. Among these 3.5 million women, nearly 52 000 were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and more than 8000 took one of the newer diabetes drugs in the three months before or after their last menstrual period.
Diabetes itself poses a risk of birth defects. High blood sugar levels in early pregnancy, which are more common in people with diabetes, increase the risk of foetal malformations. Therefore, the researchers were not surprised to see a slightly elevated risk in this group.
Among women diagnosed with type 2 diabetes before pregnancy, 5.3% of babies were born with severe birth defects, including 2.2% with heart defects, compared to the overall group where 3.8% had severe birth defects and 1.3% with heart defects.
No increased risk of birth defects
However, the researchers found that the women with diabetes treated with the newer diabetes drugs did not have a higher risk of giving birth to children with birth defects than the women with diabetes treated with insulin.
“It has already been shown that insulin is safe to use during pregnancy and that it does not cross the placenta. The increased risk of birth defects in the children of women with type 2 diabetes using the newer diabetes drugs is therefore very likely caused by the disease,” says first author Carolyn Cesta, Associate Professor at the Center for Drug Epidemiology at Karolinska Institutet.
Despite being the largest study in this field to date, covering more than 3.5 million pregnancies, relatively few women used the new diabetes drugs, and the researchers stress that further studies are needed to confirm the results. However, they note that the study still shows that these drugs do not pose a major risk of birth defects.
As type 2 diabetes becomes more common among women of childbearing age and as GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide (Wegovy, Ozempic) are approved to treat obesity, the number of exposed pregnancies is likely to increase.
“Our findings provide a first indication of the safety of infants exposed to these medications during pregnancy,” says Carolyn Cesta.
A study published in Annals of Internal Medicine has suggested that the new sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) may be viable as a first-line treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with reduced odds of hospitalisation for heart failure compared to those receiving metformin.
In cardiovascular outcome trials among adults with T2D, SGLT-2i have shown therapeutic promise, including reduced risk of hospitalisation for heart failure compared to placebo. However, SGLT-2i have mainly been evaluated as a second-line treatment, as metformin is generally given as a first-line, antidiabetic treatment.
In a new study, researchers from the Brigham compared cardiovascular outcomes among adults with T2D who initiated first-line treatment with either metformin or SGLT-2i. For the study, 8613 patients treated with SGLT-2i were matched to 17 226 patients treated with metformin. The authors found that patients receiving SGLT-2i showed a similar risk for myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality, and a lower risk for hospitalization for heart failure compared with patients who received metformin. The risk for adverse events was similar except for an increased risk for genital infections compared with those receiving metformin.
“Our results suggest that SGLT-2i may be considered as first-line treatment for patients with T2D and cardiovascular disease or who are at increased risk for cardiovascular events,” said lead author HoJin Shin, BPharm, PhD, of the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics. “However, more evidence from randomised clinical trials or observational studies will help us to identify patients who would benefit most from using SGLT-2i as first-line type 2 diabetes treatment.”
Researchers presented new evidence that SGLT2 inhibitors may benefit a wide range of patients with heart failure (HF). At the ESC Congress 2022 in Barcelona, and in simultaneous publications in The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet, physician-scientists presented late-breaking research from the largest trial to date of heart failure patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF).
They showed that dapagliflozin, which had previously been shown to benefit patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), is likely to also reduce cardiovascular death and hospitalisation for patients with mildly reduced or preserved EF, for whom therapeutic options are limited. A meta-analysis that included two clinical trials further strengthened the evidence that this class of drugs may provide protection for a wide range of heart failure patients.
Scott Solomon, MD, at the Brigham, presented results from the AstraZeneca-funded DELIVER trial, a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of dapagliflozin among patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved EF.
“In the largest and most inclusive trial of heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, we found that treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin can benefit patients across the full spectrum of heart failure,” explained Dr Solomon. “These findings establish SGLT2 inhibitors as foundational treatment for patients living with heart failure, regardless of ejection fraction, to help prevent hospitalisation and morbidity and to extend meaningful survival and improve health-related quality of life. These are the outcomes that matter most to patients and to clinicians – to keep patients feeling well and living longer.”
Muthiah Vaduganathan, MD MPH, also at the Brigham, presented results from a pre-specified meta-analysis of DELIVER and EMPEROR-Preserved, a large-scale clinical trial of empagliflozin, funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly.
“Our meta-analysis, encompassing more than 12 000 patients, provides a summary of the totality of the evidence and drives home the message that, when it comes to heart failure, this is a therapy for all,” said Dr Vaduganathan. “These trials included patients across a broad range of ages, race, functional class, sex and medical histories, but regardless of individual characteristics, they benefited consistently from this treatment.”
Dapagliflozin is a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, which causes the body to excrete sugar in urine. As well as blood glucose control in diabetes, SGLT-2 inhibitors have been shown to provide significant cardiovascular and kidney disease benefits. The DELIVER trial was designed to determine whether dapagliflozin would decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved EF.
The international trial enrolled patients aged 40 or older and had symptomatic HF with an EF of greater than 40%, including mildly reduced ejection fraction and preserved EF, as well as patients who had previously had reduced EF that had improved to greater than 40%, and in both the outpatient and inpatient setting. More than 6000 participants were randomised to receive dapagliflozin or placebo and followed for a median of 2.3 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure.
Dapagliflozin significantly reduced the primary composite endpoint by 18 percent. In the dapagliflozin group, 11.8% experienced worsening heart failure compared to 14.5% of the placebo group. Cardiovascular death in these groups occurred in 7.4 % and 8.3% of participants, respectively. Key secondary outcomes were also significantly reduced, including total heart failure hospitalisations and total symptom burden.
The meta-analysis used data from DELIVER and EMPEROR-Preserved, with a composite of cardiovascular death or first hospitalisation for heart failure. SGLT2 inhibitors were found to reduce primary outcome risk by 20%. Effects were consistent across subgroups by age, sex, race, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, history of various medical conditions and more.
The team further incorporated data from additional clinical trials with SGLT2 inhibitors, including those performed with dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in patients with HFrEF, and in patients from a clinical trial of the SGLT1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin. Taken together, the evidence with all these data suggest that patients across the full spectrum of HF benefit from this class of drugs, regardless of EF or care setting.
Limitations were noted by the authors. Black patients made up less than 5% of the patients enrolled in DELIVER; the COVID pandemic limited symptom assessment after March 2020; and subgroups in the trial were underpowered. However, findings were consistent across prespecified subgroups.
“There are more than 64 million people worldwide affected by heart failure, half of whom have mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction,” said Dr Solomon. “Our goal is to rigorously and scientifically evaluate potential treatments so that we can provide the best evidence-based care to help them lead longer, healthier lives.”
Empagliflozin, normally used to reduce blood sugar levels in adults with Type 2 diabetes, may also decrease blood vessel dysfunction associated with ageing such as arteriosclerosis, according to a new study published in the journal GeroScience.
First, the researchers studied the role ageing plays in human blood vessel function and stiffness. Then they evaluated how treatment with the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin improved blood vessel function and reduced arterial stiffness in aged male mice.
“Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of death in older adults in the US,” explained Camila Manrique-Acevedo, MD, associate professor of medicine. “Weight loss, physical activity, antihypertensive therapy and lipid-lowering drugs have shown variable effectiveness at improving blood vessel function and reducing arterial stiffness. But additional approaches are needed to improve vascular health in older adults.”
The study first compared blood vessel function and stiffness in 18 healthy human patients, average age 25, with 18 patients, average age 61. They found the older patients had impaired endothelial function and increased aortic stiffness when compared to the younger patients.
“Our findings in young and older adults confirm previous clinical data demonstrating the impact of aging on blood vessel function and arterial stiffness,” Associate Prof Manrique-Acevedo said. “Importantly, we were able to replicate this data in a rodent model.”
To investigate the effects of empagliflozin on vascular ageing, researchers fed empagliflozin to 72-week-old mice in their diet, while their control group received standard food. After six weeks, researchers discovered the mice given empagliflozin experienced improved blood vessel function, reduced arterial stiffness and other vascular benefits.
“To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the potential role of SGLT2 inhibition in reversing vascular ageing,” Associate Prof Manrique-Acevedo said. “And our findings highlight the need for further clinical investigations to determine the potential role of SGLT2 inhibition as a therapeutic tool to delay or reverse vascular ageing in humans.”
Dapagliflozin, widely used to treat type 2 diabetes, was shown to improve symptoms and physical limitations in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, according to clinical trial results reported in Nature Medicine.
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) occurs when the heart’s lower left chamber is unable to fill with blood properly. The condition accounts for approximately half of all heart failure cases and disproportionally affects older individuals. Patients with HFpEF can experience a host of debilitating symptoms linked to cardiometabolic abnormalities, including physical limitations, impaired cognition and poor quality of life. Life expectancy is also reduced for patients with this diagnosis, with 50% of patients with the diagnosis not expected to survive more than five years.
Finding ways to improve patients’ health and developing or identifying therapeutic interventions that not only reduce hospitalisation but also improve patient survival is key, the researchers said, but at present there are no available treatments that improve patient survival for patients with HFpEF.
Previous studies have shown that sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors – which inhibit SGLT2 receptor proteins produced by the kidneys and are used to treat type 2 diabetes – reduces risk of cardiovascular death and heart failure-related hospitalisation in patients with HFpEF.
For this trial, the researchers measured patient-reported symptoms, physical limitations and function in patients with HFpEF who were taking dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor drug.
A total of 324 patients with HFpEF, 56.8% women, were randomised to receive either dapagliflozin or placebo for 12 weeks and at the end of the trial were evaluated using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score, a measure of heart failure-related health status. “It’s important to note the percentage of women that were enrolled in this study because usually women are under-enrolled in clinical trials,” pointed out study co-author Professor Sadiya Khan.
Compared to the placebo group, an overall improvement in patient-reported symptoms, physical limitations and exercise function was seen in the dapagliflozin group. Adverse events were also similar between both groups, the authors reported.
“It was definitely surprising and very exciting to see such a stark difference between the treatment group and the placebo group, that there was this clear separation that happened even over a short period of time,” Prof Khan said, adding that next steps will be to investigate dapagliflozin’s precise molecular mechanisms that enable its effectiveness.
