Credit: Darryl Leja National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes Of Health
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted Fast Track designation for SYNC-T SV-102 therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). SV-102 is part of Syncromune Inc.’s SYNC-T platform, an in situ personalised therapy that uses a combination multi-target approach to cancer treatment, aiming to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients.
The Fast Track designation was granted based on the potential of SYNC-T SV-102 therapy to address the significant unmet need in treating patients with mCRPC. This advanced form of prostate cancer affects over 40 000 men in the US alone and is associated with a very poor prognosis. The Fast Track process is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of therapies that treat serious conditions and fulfil an unmet medical need, with the goal of getting important new treatments to patients sooner. Fast Track designation provides Syncromune with several key benefits, including more frequent FDA interactions, eligibility for accelerated approval, and priority review.
“The Fast-Track designation for SYNC-T SV-102 therapy signifies another step forward in bringing our potentially groundbreaking therapy to patients who need it most,” said Eamonn Hobbs, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Syncromune. “This accomplishment builds upon the foundation of positive Phase 1 clinical data and recent IND clearance.”
Syncromune’s lead candidate, SYNC-T SV-102, is a platform therapy that combines an in situ vaccine via partial oncolysis of a tumour followed by intratumoural infusion of the SV-102 fixed-dose multi-target biologic drug into the lysed tumour. This combination is designed to provide both immune stimulation and block immune suppression to activate and proliferate T cells to elicit a systemic anti-tumour response. Interim data from a Phase 1 study of SV-102 in males with mCRPC demonstrated an overall response rate of 85% with a favourable safety profile and tolerability. The Fast-Track designation comes on the heels of clearance of the company’s investigational new drug (IND) application, with studies expected to begin in the US this year.
Charles Link, M.D., Executive Chairman of Syncromune added, “We believe that Fast-Track designation for SYNC-T SV-102 will significantly aid our development goals for this therapy for men with difficult to treat prostate cancer. We look forward to initiating trials at multiple US sites later this year to expand our efforts to develop the SYNC-T SV-102 Therapy.”
The Stockholm3 blood test, developed by researchers at Karolinska Institutet, is equally effective at detecting prostate cancer in different ethnic groups, according to a new paper published in The Journal of Clinical Oncology. The test produces significantly better results than the current PSA standard.
Stockholm3, a prostate cancer test developed in Sweden, runs a combination of protein and genetic markers from a blood sample through an algorithm to find the probability of a patient having clinically significant cancer.
Studies in more than 90 000 men have shown that Stockholm3 produces significantly better results than the current PSA standard. The test improves prostate cancer diagnosis by reducing unnecessary MRI and biopsies and by identifying significant cancers in men with low or normal PSA values.
Ethnically diverse group
However, previous studies have been conducted primarily in Scandinavia on a mainly White population with uncertain generalisability to the rest of the world. A Swedish-American research group has now examined how well it works in an ethnically mixed group of men in the USA and Canada.
The study included over 2000 men at 17 different clinics, 16% of whom were Asian, 24% African-American, 14% Latin American and 46% White American. All participants had a referral for a prostate biopsy on the basis of an elevated PSA score, abnormal rectal examination, MRI scan or other suspicious clinical finding.
Before the biopsy was performed, a blood test was taken along with clinical data pertinent to the Stockholm3 test, which was conducted blinded to the biopsy results.
Halving the number of unnecessary biopsies
The analysis shows that clinically relevant prostate cancer cases were found in a total of 29% of the men, somewhat more in African Americans and slightly fewer in Asians.
It also shows that the Stockholm3 test could almost halve the number of unnecessary biopsies (45 per cent fewer: 673 as opposed to 1226) while being no less effective at detecting all clinically relevant cases. The results were similar across the different ethnic groups.
“The study demonstrates that the Stockholm3 test is just as effective on an ethnically mixed group as it is on a White, Swedish population,” says the study’s lead author Hari T. Vigneswaran, doctor and PhD student at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet.
According to him, the research answers several important questions and will lead to a more widespread use of the method:
“Colleagues in other countries are very interested in these data, which show that Stockholm3 works for a non-Swedish population and among minorities.”
Credit: Darryl Leja National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes Of Health
Researchers have developed a new urine-based test that addresses a major problem in prostate cancer: how to separate the slow-growing form of the disease unlikely to cause harm from more aggressive cancer that needs immediate treatment.
The test, called MyProstateScore2.0, or MPS2, looks at 18 different genes linked to high-grade prostate cancer. In multiple tests using urine and tissue samples from men with prostate cancer, it successfully identified cancers classified as Gleason 3+4=7 or Grade Group 2 (GG2), or higher. These cancers are more likely to grow and spread compared to Gleason 6 or Grade Group 1 prostate cancers, which are unlikely to spread or cause other impact. More than one-third of prostate cancer diagnoses are this low-grade form. Gleason and Grade Group are both used to classify how aggressive prostate cancer is.
Results from the University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center-led study are published in JAMA Oncology.
“Our standard test is lacking in terms of its ability to clearly pick out those who have significant cancer. Twenty years ago, we were looking for any kind of cancer. Now we realise that slow-growing cancer doesn’t need to be treated. All of a sudden, the game changed. We went from having to find any cancer to finding only significant cancer,” said co-senior study author John T. Wei, M.D., David A. Bloom Professor of Urology at Michigan Medicine.
Prostate-specific antigen, or PSA, remains the linchpin of prostate cancer detection. MPS2 improves upon a urine-based test developed by the same U-M team nearly a decade ago, following a landmark discovery of two genes that fuse to cause prostate cancer. The original MPS test, which is used today, looked at PSA, the gene fusion TMPRSS2::ERG, and another marker called PCA3.
“There was still an unmet need with the MyProstateScore test and other commercial tests currently available. They were detecting prostate cancer, but in general they were not doing as good a job in detecting high-grade or clinically significant prostate cancer. The impetus for this new test is to address this unmet need,” said co-senior author Arul M. Chinnaiyan, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Michigan Center for Translational Pathology. Chinnaiyan’s lab discovered the T2::ERG gene fusion and developed the initial MPS test.
“If you’re negative on this test, it’s almost certain that you don’t have aggressive prostate cancer,” said Chinnaiyan, S. P. Hicks Endowed Professor of Pathology and professor of urology at Michigan Medicine.
Moreover, MPS2 was more effective at helping patients avoid unnecessary biopsies. While 11% of unnecessary biopsies were avoided with PSA testing alone, MPS2 testing would avoid up to 41% of unnecessary biopsies.
“Four of 10 men who would have a negative biopsy will have a low risk MPS2 result and can confidently skip a biopsy. If a man has had a biopsy before, the test works even better,” Wei explained.
For example, a patient may get a prostate biopsy due to an elevated PSA, but no cancer is detected. The patient is followed over time and if his PSA inches up, he would typically need another biopsy.
“In those men who have had a biopsy before and are being considered for another biopsy, MPS2 will identify half of those whose repeat biopsy would be negative. Those are practical applications for patients out there. Nobody wants to say sign me up for another biopsy. We are always looking for alternatives and this is it,” Wei said.
Ccancer-associated fibroplasts surrounding a prostate tumour. Credit: Moscat and Diaz Meco lab.
Extracted from the core of sandalwood trees (santalum album tree), sandalwood oil has been used for many centuries by several cultures throughout the world for perfume, soaps, incense and candles. With its earthy sweet scent, this essential oil also is used in the food industry and topically in various cosmetic preparations.
Importantly, this natural oil is known for its health benefits and medicinal applications from antibacterial to anticancer because of its phytochemical constituents. In addition to containing esters, free acids, aldehydes, ketones and santenone, sandalwood oil primarily (> 90%) constitutes santalol, equal amounts of two compounds, alpha and beta-santalol.
Now, researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s Schmidt College of Medicine and collaborators are the first to demonstrate in vivo the chemo-preventive properties of alpha-santalol against prostate cancer development using a transgenic mouse model.
Results of the study, published in the journal Phytomedicine Plus, showed that administration of alpha-santalol decreased the incidence of prostate tumours by decreasing cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis, without causing weight loss or any noticeable side effects.
Apoptosis (programmed cell death) is a method the body uses to get rid of unneeded or abnormal cells such as cancer cells. Findings revealed that the area occupied by normal tissue in alpha-santalol-treated mice was 53% compared to 12% in control mice.
This suggests that administering alpha-santalol protected the normal tissue and delayed progression from prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, a precancerous condition, to poorly differentiated carcinoma, a high-grade form of cancer where cancer cells and tissue look very abnormal.
These results are significant because mortality in prostate cancer patients is mainly attributable to advanced stages of the disease.
In prior studies, the researchers demonstrated the efficacy of alpha-santalol in suppressing growth and inducing apoptotic cell death in cultured human prostate cancer cells.
Based on these observations, they selected a genetically engineered mouse model that resembles many features similar to human prostate cancer, eliciting different lesion grades and cancer progression.
“Although our cellular studies provided important mechanistic insights, relevant in vivo models are vital for developing novel chemo-preventive agents for clinical use and to determine if alpha-santalol offers protection against prostate cancer development,” said senior author Ajay Bommareddy, PhD, associate professor of pharmacology in the Department of Biomedical Science, FAU Schmidt College of Medicine.
“Prior to this new study, alpha-santalol’s in vivo efficacy against prostate cancer development had not yet been established.”
Additional findings of the current study showed alpha-santalol reduced the incidence of visible prostate tumors compared to control-treated mice.
Only 11% in the treated group developed prostate tumours whereas more than half in the control group developed the tumours.
The differences in urogenital and prostate weights were statistically significantly different in alpha-santalol-treated mice compared with controls.
The average wet weight of urogenital tract in alpha-santalol treated mice was about 74.28% lower compared with control mice.
Similarly, the average wet weight of the prostate gland was lower by 52.9% compared with control mice.
Current treatment methods for prostate cancer include androgen ablation, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy, but are ineffective against advanced prostate cancers.
Early detection and local therapy have resulted in improved outcomes but has been challenging with the management of advanced stages.
“Identifying agents that have the ability to selectively target cancerous cells and delay onset and progression of prostate cancer is greatly needed,” said Bommareddy.
“Additional studies are essential to systemically explore the feasibility of alpha-santalol as a promising chemo-preventive and anti-tumour agent against human prostate cancer development and to elucidate the mechanisms surrounding the role of pro-apoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins.”
Credit: Darryl Leja National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes Of Health
Because low-risk prostate cancer is unlikely to spread or impact survival, experts and guidelines recommend active surveillance, which involves regular monitoring and thus avoid or delay treatment like surgery or radiation therapy and their life-changing complications. A new study examined the rates of active surveillance use and evaluated the factors associated with selecting this management strategy over surgery or radiation, with a focus on underserved Black patients who have been underrepresented in prior studies. The findings are published by Wiley online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.
For the study, called the Treatment Options in Prostate Cancer Study, Jinping Xu, MD, MS, of Wayne State University, and her colleagues analysed data from metro-Detroit, Michigan, and Georgia cancer registries, focusing on patient self-reported information related to Black and White patients who were newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer in 2014–2017.
Among 1688 patients, 57% chose active surveillance (51% of Black patients and 61% of White patients) over other treatments. After adjusting for other influencing factors, the strongest determinant of active surveillance uptake was a urologist’s recommendation to choose this option. Other factors linked with the decision to undergo active surveillance included a shared patient-physician treatment decision and greater knowledge about prostate cancer. Also, participants living in metro-Detroit were more likely to choose active surveillance than those living in Georgia.
Conversely, men were less likely to try active surveillance if their considerations were strongly influenced by the desire to achieve a “cure” or they expected to “live longer” with treatment, or if they perceived that their low-risk prostate cancer diagnosis was more “serious.”
Education and interventions for patients and especially urologists that address these factors may increase the use of recommended active surveillance among individuals with low-risk prostate cancer.
“I am glad to see that the majority of our study participants selected active surveillance, which indicates that acceptance has improved over the last decade; however, there is room for greater acceptance. Our study findings shed new light on potentially modifiable factors that can help further increase active surveillance use among patients with newly diagnosed low-risk prostate cancer to avoid unnecessary invasive treatment and improve their quality of life,” said Dr Xu.
Credit: Darryl Leja National Human Genome Research Institute National Institutes Of Health
By James White, Head of Sales and Marketing at Turnberry Management Risk Solutions
According to the National Cancer Registry (NCR) of South Africa, prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in South Africa. In 2020, it accounted for more than 22% of all male cancers, with the average age of diagnosis being 65 years old. While prostate cancer is more common among older populations, it can affect men of any age, and although the disease is often treatable, the success of treatment and survival rate depends heavily on an early diagnosis and access to appropriate treatment. The last thing anyone wants to think about after a diagnosis is how they will pay for the treatment, or if they can even afford it, which is why gap cover has become an essential weapon in the fight against cancer.
Key points about prostate cancer
While the exact cause of prostate cancer is unknown, there are several risk factors that increase a man’s likelihood of developing the disease. These include age, family history, and lifestyle factors such as diet and exercise. However, if it is caught early, prostate cancer can often be successfully treated, so it is important for men to get regular check-ups and prostate cancer screenings starting at age 50 (or earlier if they have a family history or other risk factors). Regular screenings can help detect prostate cancer before it has a chance to spread, giving men the best chance of a favourable outcome.
It is also important to know that help and support are available. Prostate cancer can be a difficult diagnosis for men and their families, but there are many resources available for support, including support groups like the Machi Filotimo Cancer Project, as well as online forums, and counselling services. These resources can help men and their families cope with the emotional and practical challenges of a prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. When it comes to the financial side, it is important to understand your medical aid scheme and plan option, and how treatments will be covered.
Shortfalls and PMB conditions
Prostate cancer is a Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) condition, which means that medical aid schemes in South Africa are required by law to provide cover for diagnosis, treatment, and care, in line with that which is available at a state hospital. However, this does not mean that medical expense shortfalls will not occur. Co-payments may still apply for certain aspects of treatment and making use of a non-Designated Service Provider (DSP) may attract penalties. Depending on the scheme and plan option a patient has, there may also be other limitations on the cover received for cancer treatment.
For example, a PMB will cover the treatments that are available as per the protocols of a state hospital, including surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation, and hormone therapy. There are also next-generation biological cancer drugs that are used to successfully treat prostate cancer while being minimally invasive and having fewer side effects. These drugs, however, are not part of the basket of PMB care, and will be covered according to the cancer benefits of a patient’s medical aid scheme and plan. There is significant potential for shortfalls here, as these drugs are expensive, are not often fully covered, and need to be administered multiple times to be effective.
A significant gap
As with all cancers, early detection saves lives, and the sooner a patient can start to get the treatment they need, the better their prognosis. However, having to think about the financial implications can add strain to an already stressful situation. Having the right gap cover policy can be invaluable in ensuring that you can receive the best treatment, quickly, to give you the highest chance of surviving and thriving after a prostate cancer diagnosis.
At Turnberry, prostate cancer claims make up a significant 17% of all cancer-related claims, and the amounts claimed for are substantial sums of money. In 2022 alone, we paid out several high-value claims related to prostate cancer – a shortfall of R29 530 from a total bill of R84 889.50; a shortfall of R31 496.60 from a bill of R47,244.90; a claim of R54 555.50 from a total charged amount of R84 899.50; a claim of R53 722 from a total bill of R80 583; and a shortfall claim of R26 765.86 from a total bill of R39 392.80. Without gap cover, these patients would have had to fund these shortfalls out of pocket, which could significantly impact their financial wellbeing long after they received a clean bill of health.
Always talk to your broker
Medical aid schemes and the various plan options within the schemes vary in the coverage they provide as well as the way in which their cancer benefits are structured. In addition, different gap cover policies have different coverage options, which means that it is important to talk to your broker or financial advisor to find the best gap cover policy to augment your medical aid cover. Ultimately, gap cover is a small price to pay for the peace of mind it offers, that you will be covered for cancer treatments and that the financial burden of shortfalls will not fall on your shoulders, or on those of your family members either.
About Turnberry Management Risk Solutions
Founded in 2001, Turnberry is a registered financial services provider (FSP no. 36571) that specialises in Accident and Health Insurance, Travel Insurance, and Funeral Cover.
With extensive experience across healthcare and insurance industries in South Africa, Turnberry offers unsurpassed service to Brokers and clients. Turnberry’s gap cover products are available to clients on all medical aid schemes, as they are independently provided and are therefore transferable in the event of a change in the client’s medical aid scheme.
Turnberry is well represented nationally, with its Head Office based in Bedfordview, Johannesburg with Business Development Managers in Cape Town and Durban. The Turnberry Team’s focus on outstanding client service comes from having extensive knowledge and experience in the financial services sector and is underwritten by Lombard Insurance Company Limited. Lombard Insurance Company Limited is an Authorised Financial Services Provider (FSP 1596) and Insurer conducting non-life insurance business.
A technique that uses MRI as a guide can make radiotherapy safer for prostate cancer patients by better aiming beams at the prostate while sparing nearby tissue in the bladder, urethra, and rectum. That is the finding of a thorough analysis of all published clinical trials of the technique, called magnetic resonance–guided daily adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRg-A-SBRT). The analysis is published in CANCER.
By providing detailed images, MRg-A-SBRT can be used to adjust a patient’s radiation plan every day to account for anatomical changes and to monitor the position of the prostate in real time while the radiation beam is on to ensure that treatment is being directed accurately to the prostate. Although MRg-A-SBRT is becoming more popular and multiple clinical trials have tested it, it is unclear whether the technique, which requires more time and resources than standard procedures, has an impact on clinical outcomes and side effects compared with other ways of delivering radiation.
To investigate, Jonathan E. Leeman, MD, of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and his colleagues combined data from 29 clinical trials testing MRg-A-SBRT versus conventional CT-guided treatment, with a total of 2457 patients.
MRg-A-SBRT was associated with significantly fewer urinary and bowel side effects in the short term following radiation. Specifically, there was a 44% reduction in urinary side effects and a 60% reduction in bowel side effects.
“The study is the first to directly evaluate the benefits of MR-guided adaptive prostate radiation in comparison to another more standard and conventional form of radiation, and it provides support for use of this treatment in the management of prostate cancer,” said Dr Leeman.
Dr Leeman noted that the study also raises further questions regarding this type of treatment. For example, will the short-term benefits lead to long-term benefits, which are more impactful for patients? Longer follow-up will help answer this question because MRg-A-SBRT is a relatively new treatment. Also, which aspect of the technology is responsible for the improved outcomes seen in clinical trials? “It could potentially be the capability for imaging-based monitoring during the treatment or it could be related to the adaptive planning component. Further studies will be needed to disentangle this,” said Dr Leeman.
An accompanying editorial discusses the analysis’ findings, weighs the potential benefits and shortcomings of adopting this treatment strategy for patients, and questions the value of broad adoption.
Ccancer-associated fibroplasts surrounding a prostate tumour. Credit: Moscat and Diaz Meco lab.
Transgender women keep their prostates after gender-affirming surgery, and as a result are still at risk for prostate cancer, though to what extent remained unclear. A first-of-its-kind study estimates the risk at about 14 cases per 10 000, a little less than half the risk for cisgender males.
The UC San Francisco-led study drew on 22 years of data from the Veterans Affairs Health System. Despite the small sample size due to the size of the transgender population, it is still the largest of its kind.
“What we know about prostate cancer to date is almost exclusively based on cisgender men,” said the study’s lead author, Farnoosh Nik-Ahd, MD, a urology resident at UCSF. “This is an important first step in reshaping how clinicians think about prostate cancer in transgender women.”
Transgender people often face discrimination and disparities, and there has been a growing acknowledgment of the complexities involved in their health care.
The study found 155 confirmed transgender women with prostate cancer and stratified them according to whether they had used oestrogen: 116 had never used oestrogen, 17 had once used oestrogen but stopped before they were diagnosed with prostate cancer and 22 were actively on oestrogen.
The median age of diagnosis was 61 years, and 88% of the patients were white. Just 8% were Black, suggesting possible disparities affecting this group. Black cisgender men are at higher risk of being diagnosed with and dying from prostate cancer.
Though reduced compared to cisgender males, risk remains
The authors found that prostate cancer occurs in transgender women more frequently than published accounts suggest, with about 14 prostate cancer cases annually per 10 000 transgender women. Still, that rate was lower than what could be expected based on cisgender males, with 33 cases annually per 10 000.
While the numbers were small in the new study, the data suggests that transgender women who take estrogen may have delayed diagnoses. The authors also said that lower rates of prostate cancer may have been due to less PSA screening, misinterpretation of PSA levels in patients on gender-affirming hormone therapies, stigma, lack of awareness of prostate cancer risk and the effects of estrogen.
“We still have a lot of work to do to determine optimal prostate cancer screening for transgender women on oestrogen and related treatments,” said co-senior author Matthew R. Cooperberg, MD, MPH, of the UCSF Department of Urology. “This study should be a reminder to clinicians and patients alike that, regardless of gender, people with prostates are at risk for prostate cancer.”
A study published in BJU International found that while adherence to healthy diets seems to have no effect on prostate cancer risk, following an unhealthy ‘Western’ diet may increase the risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer.
The study assessed the diets of 15 296 men recruited in Spain in from 1992–1996. Among these men, 609 prostate cancer cases were identified during a median follow-up of 17 years. Diets were categorised as Western, Prudent, or Mediterranean. The Western dietary pattern consisted of a high intake of high-fat dairy products, processed meat, refined grains, sweets, caloric drinks, convenience food, and sauces, and a low intake of low-fat dairy products and whole grains. The Prudent dietary pattern was characterised by a high intake of low-fat dairy products, vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and juices. The Mediterranean dietary pattern represented a high intake of fish, vegetables, legumes, boiled potatoes, fruits, olives, and vegetable oil, and a low intake of juices.
No effect over prostate cancer risk was detected for the Prudent and Mediterranean dietary patterns, but detrimental effect was observed with the Western dietary pattern. This effect was only observed for aggressive tumors.
“Our results indicate that avoiding unhealthy dietary habits could be the best nutritional strategy to prevent aggressive prostate cancer,” said lead author Adela Castelló-Pastor, PhD, of the Carlos III Institute of Health and CIBERESP, in Spain. “Substituting the intake of Western-type diet products by products characteristic of the Mediterranean diet could also decrease the risk of other chronic diseases,” added co–senior author Marina Pollán, PhD, of the Carlos III Institute of Health and CIBERESP, in Spain.
“The information provided by the Spanish cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition – or EPIC – has contributed to improving scientific knowledge of the relationship between diet and cancer and other chronic diseases,” added co–senior author Maria-José Sánchez, MD, PhD, lecturer at the Andalusian School of Public Health, scientific director at ibs.GRANADA and researcher at CIBERESP, in Spain.
New research by scientists at the University of South Australia suggests that consumption of colourful fruits and vegetables on a regular basis reduces the risk of a prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis. These foods, rich in micronutrients, also help speed up recovery from radiotherapy for the disease.
The findings, from two studies published in the journal Cancers, highlight the importance of a Mediterranean or Asian diet that includes these foods. For the first study, researchers compared micronutrient plasma concentrations of prostate cancer patients with a healthy control group, revealing low levels of lutein, lycopene, alpha-carotene, and selenium in PC patients and high levels of iron, sulphur, and calcium in the same group, relative to controls.
The second study found increased DNA damage after radiation exposure was also associated with low lycopene and selenium in blood plasma.
Men with plasma concentrations lower than 0.25ug/mL) for lycopene and/or lower than 120ug/L for selenium have an increased risk of prostate cancer and are likely to be more sensitive to the damaging effects of radiation.
Foods that are rich in lycopene include tomatoes, melons, papayas, grapes, peaches, watermelons, and cranberries. Selenium-rich foods include white meat, fish, shellfish, eggs, and nuts.
Study co-author Dr Permal Deo says that studies show that eating foods rich in lycopene and selenium is preferable to taking supplements, where the benefits are limited.
“Our recommendation is to adopt a Mediterranean diet enlisting the help of a dietician because people absorb nutrients in different ways, depending on the food, the digestive system, the person’s genotype and possibly their microbiome,” Dr Deo says.
Prostate cancer remains one of the most common and fatal cancers in men, but the nutritional deficiencies associated with it remain largely unknown, hence this study. Other risk factors, such as ethnicity, family history and age have previously been linked to prostate cancer.
“There is strong evidence that being overweight and tall increases the risk of prostate cancer. Diets high in dairy products and low in vitamin E may also increase the risk but the evidence is less clear.”
