Tag: prescribing

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags : Leave a comment

Most Anticoagulant Dosing Problems Emerge after Initial Prescription

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs), such as rivaroxaban and apixaban, are under- or over-prescribed in up to one in eight patents, finds a new study. These prescribing issues can have life threatening consequences, and they most often occur after a provider writes the initial prescription, according to a Michigan Medicine-led study in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 

“Direct oral anticoagulants may be viewed as simpler to manage than traditional blood thinners, like warfarin, but our results highlight why providers need to be consistently monitoring anticoagulant medications before a patient experiences thrombotic or bleeding harms,” said Geoffrey Barnes, MD, MSc, senior author and associate professor of cardiology-internal medicine at U-M Medical School.

At hospitals across Michigan, off-label dosing of DOACs was relatively common among patients being treated for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism, when blood clots form in the veins. 

Researchers evaluated five years of prescribing data from 2018–2022 through the Michigan Anticoagulant Improvement Initiative, a statewide quality improvement collaborative funded by Blue Cross Blue Shield and Blue Care Network of Michigan. 

Nearly 70% of the alerts to off-label dosing occurred during a follow up visit compared to the time of the initial prescription, according to the study results  

When prescribers were contacted about the dosing issue, they made changes three-quarters of the time. 

However, only 18% of dosing alerts resulted in contact to a prescriber. 

“While many clinical decision support tools are designed to ensure accurate medication dosing at the time of an initial prescription, few address the need for ongoing monitoring,” said first author Grace C. Herron, a fourth-year student at U-M Medical School. 

“Any health system that aims to improve safe and effective DOAC prescribing must address the ongoing prescribing period which can last months to years.”

Direct oral anticoagulants became available in 2010 and quickly gained popularity because, unlike conventional blood thinners, they do not require routine monitoring to test their effectiveness. 

However, these medications have their own complicated dosing schemes that can vary based on factors such as kidney function and select interactions between drugs. 

“The hospital systems in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative are leading national efforts to develop, implement and test anticoagulation stewardship teams that ensure patients are always receiving the safest and most appropriate blood thinner possible,” Barnes said. 

“The nurses and pharmacists on these teams play a critical role in helping to monitor for any prescription issue that might develop, even months or years after a patient starts on a blood thinner medication.”

Source: University of Michigan

Categories : GastrointestinalTags :

Deprescribing Efforts Shows that PPI Risks are Less than Expected

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

Whether it’s costs, safety risks or “pill fatigue” they’re trying to reduce, many health systems and clinics have started working on ways to encourage deprescribing of medications that patients may not need. Now, a new study published in the BMJ shows the potential promise, and pitfalls, of a massive effort to reduce overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), widely prescribed for heartburn.

The findings also reveal that some of the feared risks from PPIs may be overblown.

The U.S. study tracks the impact of an intervention that imposed limits on PPI prescription size and refills for patients without a documented reason to be on the medication, discontinued old prescriptions, and provided education to patients and clinicians on alternatives.

The effort was carried out in one region of the Veterans Health Administration system, called VISN 17, and involved a quarter of a million patients, making it one of the largest ever studies on deprescribing.

Key findings

In all, the intervention led to a massive reduction in PPI use: a nearly 30% reduction in prescriptions of PPIs compared to other VA regions.

But the drive to reduce potentially unnecessary PPI use had one unintended consequence: a drop in prescribing to veterans who actually have an ongoing need to take PPIs because their other medicines carry a high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Strong evidence shows that PPIs are effective for preventing gastrointestinal bleeding and they are recommended in clinical guidelines.

Reassuringly, no matter the reason for taking PPIs, the deprescribing effort didn’t lead to increases in health care visits with gastrointestinal diagnoses. Nor did it lead to increases in gastrointestinal bleeding in patients at high risk, which suggests that the deprescribing initiative itself was safe.

Interestingly, the rate of purported negative PPI effects, such as kidney disease, stroke, heart attack or pneumonia, didn’t go down in VISN17 relative to the other regions. Hip fractures, another risk linked with PPIs in past studies, only went down by a small percentage.

This supports evidence from other high-quality studies that suggest PPIs may be a marker of patients at risk for certain adverse outcomes, but that the drugs are unlikely to be the cause.

For this reason, the main benefits to deprescribing PPIs have more to do with cost and hassle of taking more pills than clinical risk reduction.

More about the study

The new VA-funded study uses data from multiple years before and after VISN 17 implemented its PPI deprescribing program for most veterans living in Texas, and parts of New Mexico and Oklahoma.

It was led by a multi-institutional team that includes investigators from University of Michigan and the VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR) in Ann Arbor; the University of Pennsylvania and the VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (CHERP) in Philadelphia; and the Yale School of Medicine and VA Center for Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education (PRIME).

“This intervention worked so well because it was involuntary to some degree – refills could no longer be on autopilot for patients without a clear indication for the medication,” says Jacob Kurlander, MD, MS, first author of the study and a gastroenterologist at Michigan Medicine, U-M’s academic medical center, and the Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Ann Arbor Medical Center. “At the same time, what we saw is that is that patients who benefit from PPIs for bleeding prevention – which is sometimes overlooked by doctors – got swept up in this effort, too.”

This signals that deprescribing efforts need to take even more care to ensure providers don’t allow a patient who has a need for the drug to inadvertently go off it, Kurlander said.

“Our findings also suggest that PPIs may not be as harmful as some have feared,” he adds.

Before the VISN 17 program started, about 26% of veterans across the country who got their primary care from a VA provider were prescribed a PPI in a six-month period.

By the end of the study period in 2019, only about 15% of veterans in VISN 17 had a PPI prescription, compared with about 22% of those in the other regions.

This means PPI prescribing dropped by 30% within VISN 17, and that there was more than a 7% absolute reduction in PPI use between VISN 17 and other regions by the end of the study period.

The researchers even connected veterans’ VA records with their Medicare data in case they received care outside the VA, and also used information from death certificates to look for causes of cardiovascular-related death. There were no differences between VISN 17 and the other regions.