Tag: pregnancy

Diet and Exercise for Obese Mothers Lowers Cardiovascular Risk in Infants

Holding a baby's hand
Photo by William-Fortunato on Pexels

A new study, published in the International Journal of Obesity, found that 3-year-old children were more likely to exhibit risk factors for future heart disease if their mother was clinically obese during pregnancy. A behavioural lifestyle intervention reduced this risk.

There is increasing evidence to suggest that obesity in pregnancy is associated with cardiometabolic dysfunction in children, and that serious cardiovascular disease may begin in the womb.

The UPBEAT trial, conducted at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, randomised women with obesity (a BMI of over 30 kg/m2) in early pregnancy to a diet and exercise intervention or to standard pregnancy care. The intervention included one-to-one counselling, restricting dietary intake of saturated fat, eating foods with a low glycaemic index such as vegetables and legumes, moderate and monitored physical activity and tools to record exercise. The intervention arm saw improvements in weight gain in pregnancy, physical activity, a healthier diet, and a healthier metabolic profile across pregnancy.

Follow-up of the children at age three showed that children of women with clinical obesity had evidence of cardiac remodelling, a risk factor for future cardiovascular disease. Changes included increased heart muscle thickness, elevated resting heart rate, evidence of early impairment to the heart’s relaxation function and increased sympathetic nerve activity compared to women of normal weight. The children of women who were allocated to the intervention arm were protected from these early changes in heart structure and function.

Study lead Dr Paul Taylor, from King’s College London, said: “Maternal obesity appears to adversely impact the developing foetal nervous system and foetal heart development which is apparent up to 3 years-of-age. A complex lifestyle intervention in pregnancy was associated with protection against cardiac remodelling in infants. We can hypothesise that these changes to the heart and its function will get worse over time, putting the child at increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the future.”

The study suggests that maternal obesity may have a lasting impact on the child’s cardiovascular health. Promoting dietary changes and physical activity during pregnancy may reduce this risk.

Source: King’s College London

Falling Pregnant Unconsciously Curbs Smoking

pregnant woman holding her belly
Source: Anna Hecker on Unsplash

Pregnant smokers reduced their smoking by an average of one cigarette per day before becoming aware they were pregnant, according to a new study in in Addiction Biology. In the month after learning of their pregnancy, participants reduced smoking by another four cigarettes per day.

“Our findings suggest that pregnancy could curb smokers’ desire to smoke before they are even aware of having conceived,” said the study’s lead author and principal investigator, Dr Suena Huang Massey, associate professor of psychiatry and behavioural sciences and medical social sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

“While recognition of pregnancy is a common motivation to reduce or quit smoking, if biological processes in early pregnancy are also involved as suggested by this study, identifying precisely what these processes are can lead to the development of new smoking-cessation medications.”

The vast majority of research in this field focuses on the impact of a person’s smoking on the pregnancy and the baby. This study examines, instead, the impact of pregnancy on a person’s smoking behaviour.

Though it is well known that smoking is reduced in pregnancy, it was not known when it started and whether the smokers knew they were pregnant.

“Before this paper, it was largely assumed that the only thing causing pregnant smokers to cut down was a desire to protect the baby,” Dr Massey said. “While our study does support the discovery of pregnancy as a salient event, levels of pregnancy smoking began to decline before smokers suspected they were pregnant.”

These findings support a new line of research into what happens biologically during pregnancy that might be interrupting addictive behaviours, Massey said. Her hope is that the answer to this question will lead to the discovery of new and improved ways to treat addiction.

Pregnancy hormones a contributing factor?

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a hormone produced by the placenta in early pregnancy that is linked to morning sickness (nausea and vomiting during pregnancy).

“Strikingly, we observed the steepest declines in smoking precisely when hCG levels typically peak – between five and 10 weeks of pregnancy,” Massey said. “What’s more, pregnant smokers who do not quit during the first trimester (when hCG levels are elevated) are unlikely to quit before delivery, even with assistance from medications or financial incentives.”

Study methodology

Scientists estimated changes in cigarettes per day smoked, reported retrospectively, by 416 participants from two independent cohorts (145 from 2000 to 2005 and 271 from 2006 to 2009). Every participant was a smoker prior to becoming pregnant. Women in the study were interviewed about their smoking habits at 16 weeks of pregnancy and provided urine samples, so researchers could verify their reports.

On average, participants smoked about 10 cigarettes per day before conception. Between conception and the date they realised they were pregnant (highly variable and reported by each participant), smoking fell by an average of one cigarette per day. In the month after recognising the pregnancy, smoking dropped from an average of 9 cigarettes per day to five. Importantly, these declines were seen whether pregnancies were planned or unplanned, and whether smokers quit or did not quit.

Source: Northwestern University

Biological Changes in Mothers Experiencing Postpartum Depression

Woman with depression
Photo by Sydney Sims on Unsplash

Newly discovered biological changes in mothers who suffer postpartum depression may help explain the condition, yield long-sought treatments and let doctors identify those at risk even before their babies are born. The findings were published in Molecular Psychiatry.

Postpartum depression strikes up to 20% of new mothers, and roughly 20% of maternal deaths after childbirth are from suicide. Postpartum depression can cause anxiety and irritability, feelings of self-doubt and difficulty bonding with the baby, cognitive impairment, and interfering with sleeping and eating. For the child, maternal postpartum depression can lead to cognitive, emotional and social development problems.

Risk factors for postpartum depression are thought to include the mother’s age at childbirth, diabetes and prior history of mental health issues. But the new discovery suggests a previously unknown biological contributor: an impairment of the body’s ability to clean up old genetic material and other cellular debris.

“The finding that cells aren’t cleaning out old proteins and cellular debris, called autophagy, occurs before women develop depression symptoms, indicating that it could be part of the disease process,” explained Jennifer L. Payne, MD, director of the Reproductive Psychiatry Research Program at the University of Virginia School of Medicine. “There are several medications that promote autophagy in cells, so this finding might open the door to new treatments and to identification of women at risk of postpartum depression before they become ill.”

Understanding Postpartum Depression

Dr Payne and colleagues wanted to determine if ‘extracellular RNA communication’, a newly discovered form of communication among cells, might contribute to postpartum depression. Extracellular RNA communication is heightened during pregnancy and is critical in embryo implantation and in the body’s inflammatory response afterward.

The researchers analysed blood plasma samples from 14 research participants with and without postpartum depression, collected during and after their pregnancies. The researchers found that extracellular RNA communication in immune cells was altered extensively in women who suffered postpartum depression. Further, they determined that this “large and consistent” change significantly limited the women’s bodies’ ability to perform important cellular cleanup – suggesting a potential biological cause for their depression.

“Deficits in autophagy are thought to cause toxicity that may lead to the changes in the brain and body associated with depression,” Dr Payne said. “We have never fully understood the biological basis for postpartum depression, and this finding gets us closer to an understanding.”

Source: University of Virginia Health System

Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Impacts Persist to Pre-adolescence

Children
Photo by Ben Wicks on Unsplash

Children who were exposed to cannabis in the womb continue to show elevated rates of symptoms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety and other psychiatric conditions), even as they reach pre-adolescence (aged 11–12), according to research published in JAMA Pediatrics.

The study, led by Ryan Bogdan, associate professor at Washington University in St. Louis, is a follow-up to 2020 research from the Bogdan lab that revealed younger children who had been prenatally exposed to cannabis were slightly more likely to have had, inter alia, sleep problems, lower birth weight and lower cognitive performance.

In both cases, the effect is strongest when looking at exposure to cannabis after the pregnancy is known. To find out whether or not these associations persisted as the children aged, David Baranger, a postdoctoral researcher in the BRAIN Lab, revisited the more than 10 500 children from the 2020 analysis, who were an averaged of 10 years old in 2020.

The data on the children and their mothers came from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study), an ongoing study of nearly 12 000 children, beginning in 2016 when they were 9–10 years old, and their parents or caregivers.

This seemingly small change in age – from 10 to 12 – is an important one. “During the first wave, they were just children. Now they’re edging up on adolescence,” Baranger said. “We know this is a period when a large proportion of mental health diagnoses occur.”

An analysis of the more recent data showed no significant changes in the rate of psychiatric conditions as the children aged; they remain at greater risk for clinical psychiatric disorders and problematic substance use as they enter the later adolescent years.

“Once they hit 14 or 15, we’re expecting to see further increases in mental health disorders or other psychiatric conditions – increases that will continue into the kids’ early 20s,” Baranger said.

Source: University of Washington in St. Louis

Dolutegravir-based ART is Better for Pregnant Individuals with HIV-1

pregnant woman holding her belly
Source: Anna Hecker on Unsplash

Dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapies (ART) for HIV-1 are more effective for pregnant individuals than some other ART regimens commonly used in the US and Europe, according to a study available online in NEJM.

The study, led by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health researchers, showed that pregnant individuals who took dolutegravir-based regimens had a high probability of being virally suppressed at delivery. No differences were seen in adverse birth outcome risks (preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, or neonatal death) between dolutegravir-based regimens and the other contemporary regimens.

“Globally, a dolutegravir-based regimen is currently recommended for treating HIV, and this is the first study to directly compare regimens including dolutegravir to other antiretroviral regimens, such as raltegravir-based regimens, that are also listed as ‘Preferred’ in US perinatal guidelines,” said senior research scientistKunjal Patel, lead author of the study.

Dolutegravir, is a newer antiretroviral part of a once-a-day regimen that has been shown to be more effective, easier to tolerate, and less likely to create new drug resistance in people with HIV-1. However, limited data have been available about its effectiveness and safety in pregnancy compared with regimens that commonly have been used during pregnancy in the US and Europe.

In the current observational study, the researchers compared dolutegravir use in pregnancy with atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, and raltegravir antiviral regimens that are currently classified as “Preferred” for use in pregnancy in the US About half of the participants started ART before conception. At delivery, 96.7% of pregnancies of participants who received dolutegravir were virally suppressed, whereas those of participants who took atazanavir/ritonavir or raltegravir had viral suppression of 84.0% and 89.2%, respectively.

“We think the observed differences are due to dolutegravir’s ability to rapidly decrease viral loads and its ease of use as part of a once-daily regimen that’s available as a fixed-dose combination,” said Patel. “Our results highlight the continual need for systematic studies that compare new antiretroviral regimens with those already in clinical practice to help inform the evolution of guidelines and clinical practice over time.”

Source: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Maternal Phthalates Exposure Increases Preterm Birth Risk

pregnant woman holding her belly
Source: Anna Hecker on Unsplash

A National Institutes of Health study has found that pregnant women who were exposed to multiple phthalates during pregnancy had an increased risk of preterm birth. The most significant correlation was for a phthalate most commonly used in nail polish and cosmetics.

Used in a great variety of products such as cosmetics and food packaging, phthalates are endocrine-disrupting chemicals that are known to have a wide range of health effects on humans. This especially true of children, due to their impact on the developmental system, as well as the reproductive system.

Researchers analysed data from more than 6000 pregnant women in the US, and found that women with higher concentrations of several phthalate metabolites in their urine had increased risks of preterm birth.

“Having a preterm birth can be dangerous for both baby and mom, so it is important to identify risk factors that could prevent it,” said epidemiologist Kelly Ferguson, PhD, the senior author on the study published in JAMA Pediatrics.

Data from 16 US studies that included individual participant data on prenatal urinary phthalate metabolites (representing exposure to phthalates) as well as the timing of delivery. Researchers analysed data from a total of 6045 pregnant women who delivered between 1983-2018, 9% of whom delivered preterm. Phthalate metabolites were detected in more than 96% of urine samples.

Exposure to four of the 11 phthalates found in the pregnant women was associated with a 14–16% greater probability of having a preterm birth. The most consistent findings were for exposure to a phthalate that is used commonly in personal care products like nail polish and cosmetics.

Using statistical models to simulate interventions that reduce phthalate exposures, the researchers found that reducing the mixture of phthalate metabolite levels by 50% could prevent preterm births by 12% on average. Interventions targeting behaviours, such as trying to select phthalate-free personal care products (if listed on label), voluntary actions from companies to reduce phthalates in their products, or changes in standards and regulations could contribute to exposure reduction and protect pregnancies.

“It is difficult for people to completely eliminate exposure to these chemicals in everyday life, but our results show that even small reductions within a large population could have positive impacts on both mothers and their children,” said Barrett Welch, PhD, first author on the study.

Eating fresh, home-cooked food, avoiding processed food that comes in plastic containers or wrapping, and selecting fragrance-free products or those labeled ‘phthalate-free’, are examples of things people can do that may reduce their exposures. Changes to the amount and types of products that contain phthalates could also reduce exposures.

The researchers are undertaking further studies to better understand the mechanisms behind how phthalates affect pregnancy and to find ways for mothers to reduce their exposures.

Source: National Institutes of Health

Nitrous Oxide Safe and Effective Therapy for Severe COVID in Pregnancy

Pregnant with ultrasound image
Source: Pixabay

High dose inhaled nitric oxide gas (iNO) is a safe and effective respiratory therapy for pregnant women hospitalised with severe COVID pneumonia, resulting in faster weaning from oxygen and shorter hospital stay, according to a study published in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) researchers reported that the addition of twice-daily nitric oxide to standard of care oxygen therapy decreased the respiratory rate of pregnant women with low oxygenation levels of the blood without causing any side effects.

“To date, very few respiratory treatments to complement supplemental oxygenation in COVID pregnant patients have been tested,” explained the study’s senior author, Lorenzo Berra, MD. “Investigators from all four medical centers that participated in our study agreed that administration of high dose nitric oxide through a snug-fitting mask has enormous potential as a new therapeutic strategy for pregnant patients with COVID.”

Pneumonia triggered by COVID is particularly threatening to pregnant women since it may quickly progress to hypoxaemia, requiring hospitalisation and cardiopulmonary support. “Compared to non-pregnant female patients with COVID, pregnant women are three times more likely to need intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, or advanced life support, and four times more likely to die,” noted lead author Carlo Valsecchi, MD. “They also face a greater risk of obstetric complications such as preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and stillbirth.”

Nitric oxide is a therapeutic gas that was initially approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1999 for inhalation treatment of intubated and mechanically ventilated newborns with hypoxic respiratory failure. With MGH driving many early studies, iNO in high concentrations was also shown to be effective as an antimicrobial in reducing viral replication of SARS-CoV-1 and, more recently, SARS CoV-2. During the first wave of COVID, MGH treated six non-intubated pregnant patients with iNO at high doses of up to 200 parts per million (ppm). Favourable outcomes with iNO led MGH clinicians to offer this treatment to other pregnant patients, and motivated the present study.

Researchers and clinicians from multiple departments in four hospitals – including critical care medicine, respiratory care, and maternal foetal medicine – studied 71 pregnant patients with severe COVID pneumonia admitted to these hospitals, 20 of whom received iNO200 twice daily. The study found that iNO therapy at this dosage, when compared to standard of care alone, resulted in reductions in the need for supplemental oxygen and in hospital and ICU lengths of stay. No adverse events related to the intervention were reported in either mothers or their babies.

“Being able to wean patients from respiratory support quicker could have other profound implications, including reducing stress on women and their families, lowering the risk of hospital-acquired infections, and relieving the burden on the health care system,” noted Dr Berra. “Above all, our study supports the safety of high dose nitric oxide in the pregnant population, and we hope more physicians will consider incorporating it into carefully monitored treatment regimens.”

Source: Massachusetts General Hospital

Secrets of Pregnant Mothers’ ‘Super Antibodies’ Revealed

Pregnant with ultrasound image
Source: Pixabay

Pregnant mothers have the ability to confer greater immunity to the vulnerable developing foetus with ‘super antibodies’. Now, a far-reaching study published in Nature provides a surprising explanation of how this actually works, and what it could mean for preventing death and disability from a wide range of infectious diseases.

The findings suggest the amped-up antibodies that expecting mothers produce could be mimicked to create new drugs to treat diseases as well as improved vaccines to prevent them.

“For many years, scientists believed that antibodies cannot get inside cells. They don’t have the necessary machinery. And so, infections caused by pathogens that live exclusively inside cells were thought to be invisible to antibody-based therapies,” said Sing Sing Way, MD. “Our findings show that pregnancy changes the structure of certain sugars attached to the antibodies, which allows them to protect babies from infection by a much wider range of pathogens.”

“The maternal-infant dyad is so special. It’s the intimate connection between a mother and her baby,” says John Erickson, MD, PhD, first-author of the study.

Drs Way and Erickson are both part of Cincinnati Children’s Center for Inflammation and Tolerance and the Perinatal Institute, which strives to improve outcomes for all pregnant women and their newborns.

Erickson continues, “This special connection starts when babies are in the womb and continues after birth. I love seeing the closeness between mothers and their babies in our newborn care units. This discovery paves the way for pioneering new therapies that can specifically target infections in pregnant mothers and newborns babies. I believe these findings also will have far-reaching implications for antibody-based therapies in other fields.”

How mothers make super antibodies
The new study identifies the specific change in the sugar. During pregnancy, the “acetylated” form of sialic acid (one of the sugars attached to antibodies) shifts to the “deacetylated” form. This subtle molecular shift lets immunoglobulin G (IgG) take on an expanded protective role by stimulating immunity through receptors that respond specifically to deacetylated sugars.

“This change is the light switch that allows maternal antibodies to protect babies against infection inside cells,” Dr Way said.

“Mothers always seem to know best,” Dr Erickson added.

Revved-up antibodies can be produced in the lab
The research team pinned down the key biochemical differences between antibodies in virgin mice compared to pregnant ones. They also identified the enzyme naturally expressed during pregnancy responsible for driving this transformation.

Further, the team successfully restored lost immune protection by supplying lab-grown supplies of the antibodies from healthy pregnant mice to pups born to mothers that were gene-edited to lack the ability to remove acetylation from antibodies to enhance protection.

Hundreds of monoclonal antibodies have been produced as potential treatments for various disorders, including COVID, with a variety of results.

Dr Way said this molecular alteration can be replicated to change how antibodies stimulate the immune system to fine-tune their effects. This potentially could lead to improved treatments for infections caused by other intracellular pathogens including HIV and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a common virus that poses serious risks to infants.

Another reason to accelerate vaccine development
“We’ve known for years the many far-reaching benefits of breastfeeding,” Dr Erickson said. “One major factor is the transfer of antibodies in breastmilk.”

The study shows that nursing mothers retain the molecular switch, passing through the antibodies to their newborns.

Additionally, Dr Way says the findings underscore the importance of receiving all available vaccines for women of reproductive age – as well as the need for researchers to develop even more vaccines against infections that which are especially prominent in women during pregnancy or in newborn babies.

“The immunity needs to exist within the mother for it to be transferred to her child,” Dr Way said. “Without natural exposures or immunity primed by vaccination, when that light switch flips during pregnancy, there’s no electricity behind it.”

Source: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

Study Confirms Analgesics during Pregnancy Carries Risks for Newborns

Pregnant with ultrasound image
Source: Pixabay

Researchers have called for a reassessment of medical advice on analgesic use during pregnancy after a new study published in BMJ Open found that pregnant women using over-the-counter analgesics are about 1.5 times more likely to have a baby with health issues.

The study found elevated risks for preterm delivery, stillbirth or neonatal death, physical defects and other problems compared with the offspring of mothers who did not take such medications.

Between 30% and 80% of women globally use non-prescription analgesics in pregnancy for pain relief. However, there is presently great variation in evidence for safety of use during pregnancy, with some drugs considered safe and others not.

“We would encourage a strong reinforcement of the official advice for pregnant women.”

Aikaterini Zafeiri, first author of the study

The study analysed data from more than 151 000 pregnancies over 30 years (1985–2015) which contained medical notes for non-prescribed maternal consumption of five common analgesic. These were paracetamol, aspirin, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), diclofenac, naproxen and ibuprofen – either as single compounds or in combinations.

Overall, 29% of women have taken over-the-counter analgesics during pregnancy, a figure which more than doubled to 60% during the last seven years of the 30-year study period.

When asked specifically at their first antenatal clinic visit, as opposed to later in pregnancy or after labour, 84% of women using painkillers reported use during the first 12 weeks after conception. However, the duration and dose of use and medical reason for use were not recorded.

Nevertheless, given that up to 60% of women reported using over the counter analgesics, they could not all have underlying medical conditions that would cause the increased risks seen in this study.

The study found increases in the following:

  • Neural tube defects: 64% more likely.
  • Admission to a neonatal unit: 57% more likely.
  • Neonatal death: 56% more likely.
  • Premature delivery before 37 weeks: 50% more likely.
  • Baby’s condition at birth based on APGAR score of less than 7 at five minutes: 48% more likely.
  • Stillbirth: 33% more likely.
  • Birthweight under 2.5 kg: 28% more likely.
  • Hypospadias, a birth defect affecting the penis: 27% more likely.

First author of the paper, Aikaterini Zafeiri of the University of Aberdeen said: “In light of the study findings, the ease of access to non-prescription painkillers, in combination with availability of mis-information as well as correct information through the internet, raises safety concerns.

“This is especially when mis-informed or partially-informed self-medication decisions are taken during pregnancy without medical advice.

“It should be reinforced that paracetamol in combination with NSAIDs is associated with a higher risk and pregnant women should always consult their doctor or midwife before taking any over-the-counter drugs. We would encourage a strong reinforcement of the official advice for pregnant women.”

Source: University of Aberdeen

No Added Seizure Risk from Antidepressant Use in Pregnancy

Pregnant with ultrasound image
Source: Pixabay

A large Swedish study in the journal Neurology found that pregnant women taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) during the first trimester of was not linked to an increased risk for neonatal seizures and epilepsy in childhood.

Any increase in seizures or epilepsy is likely due to other factors, the researchers said.

“It’s not likely the medications themselves that are causing the seizures and epilepsy in children, but rather the reasons why these women are taking the medication,” according to Kelsey Kathleen Wiggs, a PhD candidate at Indiana University in Bloomington. There are also the other background factors that differ between women who do and do not use SSRI/SNRIs.

“When it rains, it pours,” Wiggs said. “Women who are taking antidepressants in pregnancy are doing that for lots of different reasons, and they might be at risk for different things than women who aren’t taking those medications in pregnancy.”

The study found an elevated risk for neonatal seizures (risk ratio [RR] 1.41) and epilepsy in early childhood (HR 1.21) among offspring of mothers who used antidepressants in pregnancy.

Adjustment for maternal indications for SSRI/SNRI use and background factors like smoking during pregnancy revealed that they were drivers for both associations: neonatal seizures (RR 1.10); epilepsy diagnosis at 5 years (HR 0.96). Parental history of epilepsy was not found to affect the association.

The findings provide a “conclusive answer” to these concerns with using SSRI/SNRIs during pregnancy, according to Anne Berg, PhD, and Torin Glass, BM, Bch, BAO.

“[SSRI/SNRIs] have been demonstrated to have serotonergic central nervous system effects and are associated with an observable withdrawal syndrome which may be seen in the neonate following in utero exposure,” noted Drs Berg and Glass, in an accompanying editorial.

“The authors understood that with a population-based data registry and huge sample size, they had more than sufficient statistical power to detect even a modest increase in risk,” the editorialists wrote. “They tested this hypothesis and were able to reject it, definitively!”

In order to determine whether antidepressants had a causal association with infant seizures and childhood epilepsy, the researchers analysed data from national Swedish healthcare registries on a total of 1 721 274 children in Sweden born between 1996 and 2011.

Participants were divided into two groups: one group of mothers who reported use of an SSRI (fluoxetine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, fluvoxamine, escitalopram) or SNRI (venlafaxine, duloxetine) during the first trimester of pregnancy (n = 24 308), and another group with no reported antidepressant use (n = 1 696 966).

Source: MedPage Today