Tag: polypharmacy

Categories : Ageing Neurodegenerative DiseasesTags : Leave a comment

Polypharmacy Negatively Impacts Older Adults with Dementia

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Kampus Production

Over 30% of older adults take five or more medications daily, which is termed polypharmacy. It is associated with poor health outcomes like falls, medication interactions, hospitalisations and even death. Multiple chronic conditions in older adults increases the risk of polypharmacy. While polypharmacy is more common in older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias, there is little research examining the impact on symptoms, health outcomes and physical function.

Researchers from Drexel University’s College of Nursing and Health Professions recently published a study in Biological Research For Nursing examining symptoms, health outcomes and physical function over time in older adults with and without Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and polypharmacy.

Led by Martha Coates, PhD, the research team found that individuals who are experiencing polypharmacy and have Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias experience more symptoms, falls, hospitalisations, mortality and had lower physical function – indicating that polypharmacy can also negatively impact quality of life for older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias.

“The cut-off of point of five or more medications daily has been associated with adverse health outcomes in previous research, and as the number of medications increase the risk of adverse drug events and harm increases,” said Coates.

The research team used a publicly available dataset from the National Health and Aging Trends Study – a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries in the United States from Johns Hopkins University. Since 2011, data is collected yearly to examine social, physical, technological and functional domains that are important in aging.

For this study, the research team used data from 2016 through 2019 to compare changes in symptoms, health outcomes and physical function among four groups: 1) those with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and polypharmacy; 2) those with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias only; 3) those with polypharmacy only; and 4) those without either Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias or polypharmacy.

Coates explained that the researchers used analytic weights to analyse the data, which generates national estimates, making the sample of 2052 individuals representative of 12 million Medicare beneficiaries in the US, increasing the generalisability of the findings.

“We found that older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and polypharmacy experienced more unpleasant symptoms, increased odds of falling, being hospitalised and mortality compared to those without Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and polypharmacy,” said Coates. “They also experienced more functional decline, required more assistance with activities of daily living like eating, bathing and dressing, and were more likely to need an assistive device like a cane or walker.”

Coates noted that there are tools available to help health care providers review and manage medication regimens for older adults experiencing polypharmacy and possibly taking medications that are potentially inappropriate or no longer provide benefit. However, currently there are no specific tools like that for older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias.

The findings from this research shed light on the negative impact polypharmacy can have on older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. But Coates added that further research is needed to develop strategies to reduce the occurrence of polypharmacy in people with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias.

The research team anticipates this study will help guide future analysis of the impact of specific medications on health outcomes in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and that it provides a foundation to support intervention development for medication optimisation in older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias and polypharmacy.

Source: Drexler University

Categories : CancerTags :

Over-the-counter Drugs and Supplements Overlooked in Polypharmacy

On By ModernMedia
Pills and tablets
Photo by Myriam Zilles on Unsplash

While patients usually report any medications they are on, over-the-counter drugs and supplements are not reported as often to the medical team, according to a study on polypharmacy published in The Oncologist, an overlooked situation that complicates the problem of polypharmacy, especially in cancer.

Polypharmacy can lead to harmful drug interactions, especially dangerous for cancer patients about to undergo therapy.

Even for those without cancer, multiple medication use has risks and is tricky to navigate because of the emotions involved, said Erika Ramsdale, MD, study leader.

“As doctors, we tell people to take medications but we don’t always do a great job of following up,” she said. “From the patient perspective, if it’s determined that a medication is no longer needed, it’s hard to stop taking it. There’s a sense of, ‘What will happen if I stop?’ or ‘Are you giving up on me?’ A lot of uncertainty and emotions are tied up in this issue.”

The more drugs and supplements a person takes, the higher the risk of inappropriate use and serious drug interactions, she said.

The fragmentation of healthcare across specialties complicates the issue. “Sometimes, there is no quarterback,” Dr Ramsdale said, which can result in “prescribing cascades,” where additional drugs are given to offset the adverse side effects of the original medications.

Researchers analysed medication use in a sample of 718 adults with a mean age of 77 who had stage 3 or 4 cancer and other health conditions. They screened for potentially inappropriate medications that have risks higher than benefits (known as PIMS), drug-drug interactions (DDI), and drug-cancer treatment interactions (DCI). Drug interaction can have consequences such as falls, functional decline, and death. Patients on multiple medications are also more likely to have anxiety or depression.

Among the 718 patients, 70% were at risk of drug-drug interactions and 67% were taking at least one drug that was potentially inappropriate.

In fact, 61% of the patients were taking five or more medications before starting chemotherapy – and nearly 15% were taking 10 or more medications.

Other findings from the study include:

  • Nearly 68% of the patients had serious health issues besides cancer, requiring associated medications. Most common was cardiovascular disease. When a person has cancer combined with other ailments, there is a greater risk of toxicity from cancer treatments due to polypharmacy.
  • Approximately 10% of hospital admissions for older adults are associated with hazardous drug interactions. Among older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy, polypharmacy is associated with dramatic increases (up to 114%) in unplanned hospitalisations.
  • Cholesterol-lowering medications, minerals, and thyroid therapy are most commonly involved in potential drug interactions.
  • More than 25% of the medications used by the patients in the study were non-prescription—and these accounted for 40% of the potentially inappropriate medications detected by investigators.
  • Common non-prescription remedies included vitamins and minerals, anti-anemic preparations such as ferrous sulfate, and drugs for acid-related disorders and constipation.

“Older adults may incorrectly assume that over-the-counter medications are safe for them,” the authors wrote. “This study helps delineate the size and shape of a problem under-recognised by both providers and patients.”

It’s also an understudied problem, Dr Ramsdale said, and including over-the-counter medications sets Wilmot’s data apart from previous research; most polypharmacy studies among cancer patients look only at prescription drugs.

The study highlights an opportunity for education and problem-solving, such as deprescribing some drugs.

Deprescribing is the planned reduction of medications to avoid harm. Doctors take into account the risks-versus-benefits of each medication and the patient’s life expectancy. For example, statins that are taken for high cholesterol do not have an immediate effect. They are meant to be preventive and can take 10 years to have an impact. Therefore, if a patient is old and has incurable cancer, he or she may not need to take statins. (Discontinuing statins in this setting is supported by a landmark study, according to the Ramsdale publication.)

However, these conversations can be quite delicate, Ramsdale said. The goal is to promote better quality of life, and she is conducting a clinical trial to test the best way to intervene in cases of polypharmacy among older people with cancer.

Source: University of Rochester Medical Center

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

An Extra Drug or More of the Same for Uncontrolled Hypertension?

On By ModernMedia
Source: Unsplash

A new study may help people with uncontrolled hypertension and their doctors decide whether to increase the dose of one of their existing drugs, or add a new one, to bring down their blood pressure.

Reviewing data from veterans over age 65 receiving treatment over two years, researchers found that patients have a better chance of adhering to their medication regimen if their doctor maximises the dosage of one of the drugs they’re already taking. While both strategies decrease blood pressure, they found adding a new medication has a very slim advantage over increasing the dose of an existing medication, despite some of the patients being unable to stay on the new medication.

In the end, the researchers say, the new findings could add to discussions between physicians and patients whose blood pressure remains elevated despite starting medication treatment.

The findings, reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine, focus on patients whose initial systolic blood pressure was above 130mmHg.

By looking back at VA and Medicare data, the researchers were able to see patterns in treatment and blood pressure readings over time, in a kind of natural experiment. All the patients were taking at least one blood pressure medication at less than the maximum dose and had a treatment intensification at the start of the study period, indicating that their physicians thought they needed more intense treatment.

Intensifying treatment must be carefully considered, as there are many concerns — whether a drug interaction if a new drug is added, or an electrolyte imbalance with high doses, or fainting and falling if a person’s pressure gets too low .

This is the first time the two approaches have been compared, said first author Dr Carole E. Aubert.

“There’s increasing guidance on approaches to starting treatment in older adults, but less on to the next steps to intensify treatment, especially in an older and medically complex population that isn’t usually included in clinical trials of blood pressure medication,” she said. “How can we increase medications safely in a population already taking many medications for hypertension and other conditions.”

“Treatment guidelines do suggest starting treatment with multiple medications, and clinicians are comfortable with an approach of ‘starting low and going slow’ in older patients,” said senior author Dr Lillian Min. “But these results show that in older patients, we have further opportunity to tailor choices in intensifying drug therapy for hypertension, depending on the individual patient’s characteristics.”

She continued, “Is the patient more likely to stick to a simpler regimen? Then increase an existing medication. Or is the blood pressure very high and the clinician is more concerned about reducing it? Then consider starting a new medication now.”

For older adults already on various medications, overcomplicating it with another pill may be excessive. The risks of polypharmacy are already well known, Dr Min said.

Source: University of Michigan