Tag: JAK-1 inhibitor

Abrocitinib Promising in Teen Atopic Dermatitis

Credit: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

Following treatment with the investigational oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor abrocitinib plus topical therapy, teenagers with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis (AD) showed significant improvement to placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA Dermatology.

Up to 20% of children and adolescents are affected by AD, which has an adverse impact on QoL, academic performance, and social relationships, as well as the QoL of caregivers. Subcutaneous dupilumab is safe and effective in moderate-to-severe AD in adolescents, but there is a lack of an oral option, they said.

Nearly half of the patients had clear or almost clear skin by clinician assessment (IGA), and about 70% of patients treated with either of two doses of the JAK inhibitor had at least 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75). In contrast, a fourth of patients who received placebo in addition to topical therapy met the clinician assessment outcome and about 40% met EASI-75 criteria.

Abrocitinib, a JAK-1-selective inhibitor, had already shown to be tolerable and effective in adults. The present trial included 285 patients aged 12 to 17, with coprimary endpoints being an IGA score of 0/1 with at least a two-grade improvement from baseline, plus an EASI-75 response, with both outcomes assessed at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included improvement in pruritis.

An IGA 0/1 response was seen in 46.2% of patients treated with abrocitinib 200 mg and 41.6% of those assigned to abrocitinib 100 mg, compared to 24.5% in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who met EASI-75 response criteria was 72% with abrocitinib 200 mg, 68.5% with abrocitinib 100 mg, and 41.5% with placebo. Significant improvement was seen in pruritis compared to placebo, showing an improvement in pruritis. The researchers noted that improved indicators could lead to better sleep and QoL indicators.

AE rates were 62.8% with the higher dose of abrocitinib, 56.8% with the lower dose, and 52.1% in the placebo group, with nausea occurring more often with abrocitinib 200 mg than with abrocitinib 100 mg (18.1% vs 7.4%).

These results suggest abrocitinib has great potential for treating teenage AD, said John C. Browning, MD, of Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists in Dallas. Current there are no JAK inhibitors indicated for AD, and an oral option is very exciting he to MedPage Today via email. “Not everyone responds to current systemic therapies, so there is a definite need for new treatments.”

“I think more teens will be open to trying an oral option, but they will need to be committed to taking it every day,” he said, adding that compliance is an issue. “Both abrocitinib and dupilumab are effective, so there is not a tradeoff in going from injections to oral therapy.”

Source: MedPage Today