Tag: ischaemic stroke

Thrombolytic Drug Still Effective up to 24 Hours after Ischaemic Stroke Onset

Credit: American Heart Association

The thrombolytic medication, alteplase, improved stroke patients’ recovery by more than 50% when given up to 24 hours after the beginning of an ischaemic stroke, according to preliminary late-breaking science presented at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference 2025.

These results give hope to stroke patients worldwide who may not be able to access thrombolytic medications within the approved time window, which in China is within 4.5 hours, said the trial’s principal investigator Min Lou, MD, PhD, a professor at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University’s School of Medicine in China.

In the US, alteplase is approved to treat stroke within three hours of symptom onset and is recommended for use up to 4.5 hours for select patients. Other research has indicated it may also work well in some patients 4.5 to 9 hours after stroke onset.

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2019 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke note that IV alteplase within 4.5 hours of stroke onset is the standard of care for most ischaemic stroke patients in the United States.

Researchers enrolled 372 stroke patients whose symptoms began 4.5 hours to 24 hours earlier. They used widely available CT perfusion imaging (advanced brain scanning) to confirm that these patients still had brain tissue that could recover with treatment. Participants were randomised to receive alteplase, while the other received standard stroke care of antiplatelet therapy at the discretion of the investigator, based on the Chinese Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke 2018. Functional recovery was assessed at 90 days.

“We believe these findings mean more people may return to normal or near-normal lives after a stroke, even if they receive treatment later than originally thought beneficial,” Lou said. “This method of treatment could become the new standard, especially in hospitals that use CT perfusion imaging. This technology helps health care professionals see how blood flows in different parts of the brain after an ischemic stroke. This could extend treatment eligibility to millions more patients across the globe.”

The study found:

  • 40% of participants treated with alteplase had little to no disability after 90 days, compared to 26% of those who received standard care – a 54% higher chance of functional recovery.
  • Less than 3% of participants in either group received rescue mechanical clot removal as an additional treatment.
  • Rates of death were the same (10.8%) for both groups.
  • The risk of brain bleeding was higher among those who received alteplase than among participants who did not (3.8% vs. 0.5%), but researchers believe this is a manageable risk.

“We also need to look more closely at how safe and effective other clot-dissolving medications, like tenecteplase, are when given after a stroke, especially beyond the usual time frames. It’s also important to learn if our findings apply to other groups of people, especially in areas with different stroke risks and health care resources,” Lou explained.

Study limitations include the that both participants and researcher knew which treatment was being given, which could have introduced bias, and results may not be generalizable to patients outside of China.

Study design, background and details:

  • The study enrolled 372 stroke patients in a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial at 26 stroke centers in China.
  • The patient’s average age was 72 years, and 43% were women.
  • The trial used widely available CT perfusion imaging software to gauge salvageable brain tissue, making the findings more applicable to real-world clinical settings.
  • Enrolled patients were assigned to the alteplase group or a standard medical treatment group.
  • The primary outcome was a score of 0 or 1 on the modified Rankin scale, which scores disability from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death) at 90 days.

Study co-authors, funding and disclosures are available in the abstract.

Source: American Heart Association

Propranolol may Halve Risk of Ischaemic Stroke in Women with Migraines

Credit: American Heart Association

Propranolol, a drug often used to treat hypertension and prevent migraines was associated with a reduction in ischaemic stroke risk among women – but not men – using the drug for migraine prevention, according to a preliminary study to be presented at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference 2025. The meeting is in Los Angeles, Feb. 5-7, 2025, and is a world premier meeting for researchers and clinicians dedicated to the science of stroke and brain health.

The beta blocker propranolol had a stronger protective effect for ischaemic stroke risk in women with migraine, particularly those without aura. The medication did not have the same protective effect on men.

Migraine headaches are common in the general population, but they occur three times more often in women than in men. This debilitating condition is associated with an increased risk of stroke. While the beta blocker propranolol can be used to prevent migraines, its effectiveness in reducing overall stroke risk is still uncertain.

“Migraine is an often-ignored risk factor for cardiovascular issues. Until recently, preventive treatments for people who have migraines were not available,” said lead study author Mulubrhan Mogos, PhD, MSc, FAHA, an assistant professor at Vanderbilt University School of Nursing. “Many women suffer from migraines, and it’s important to note that propranolol may be beneficial for these women, particularly those who experience migraine without aura. This is an important discovery for those dealing with migraines.”

Mogos also noted that migraine disproportionately affects women from historically under-resourced communities, and this disparity may impact the ability to achieve education goals or maintain stable employment, creating a vicious cycle. While new treatments have proven effective, they may not be accessible to women in these groups due to high costs.

For the study, researchers reviewed more than 3 million electronic health records from two large databases. In separate analyses, researchers identified people with migraine who developed stroke and a control group of those with migraine who did not develop stroke. They then assessed whether the individuals were treated with propranolol for migraine and whether that treatment had impacted stroke risk.

“We initially looked at overall stroke and then ischemic stroke specifically. We refined our analysis further by controlling for possible confounders and found the association is significant and stronger for ischaemic stroke,” Mogos said.

After adjusting for potential variables, such as demographics (age, sex, race), other conditions (high blood pressure, diabetes, etc) and hormonal factors (use of birth control, pregnancy – considered separately for each woman) that might affect results the analysis found:

  • Propranolol was significantly associated with a reduced risk of ischaemic stroke in women with migraine, particularly in those without aura. The risk of developing a stroke was 52% lower for women taking the medication in one database analysis and 39% lower in the other. No stroke risk reduction was seen in men in either analysis group.
  • The protective effect of propranolol was stronger for ischaemic stroke and in women with migraine without aura. Migraine aura can include disturbances, such as flashing lights, blind spots, zigzag patterns or seeing coloured spots. Other symptoms include tingling or numbness in the face or hands, difficulty speaking, dizziness or confusion.
  • Secondary analyses showed lower overall stroke rates in women taking propranolol at multiple time points in both databases.

“Our findings indicate that women and health care professionals should discuss the advantages of preventive migraine interventions. For under-resourced individuals who bear a greater burden from this condition and may lack access to new treatments, we must ensure these treatments are available to them. This approach can help reduce health disparities,” Mogos said.

The main limitation is that this was a review of past data using electronic health records, which may introduce biases, such as misclassification errors from reliance on ICD codes (codes used to classify and report health conditions and diseases). These findings highlight the need for studies that look forward in time to confirm these results.

Source: American Heart Association

Study Likely to Change Standard of Care for Deadly Vertebrobasilar Stroke

Ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0

Endovascular therapy (EVT), a minimally invasive surgery performed inside the blood vessels, is 2 ½ times more likely than standard medical management to achieve a positive outcome after vertebrobasilar stroke that affects the back of the brain, including the brain stem. A meta-analysis of four randomised clinical trials, published in The Lancet, was led by UPMC Stroke Institute director Raul Nogueira, MD.

Investigators from the US, Netherlands and China formed a multi-centre collaboration of all four randomised trials of EVT in vertebrobasilar occlusion with data that provides the strongest evidence to date of the benefits of EVT over alternative approaches for complicated vessel obstructions in life-sustaining areas of the brain.

Although vertebrobasilar artery occlusions interrupting blood flow in the back of the brain account for only a small fraction of all ischaemic strokes, they are especially deadly. Without an appropriate intervention, vertebrobasilar strokes lead to high rates of severe disability and mortality that may exceed 70%.

“While the overwhelming benefit of EVT for acute ischaemic strokes due to occlusions of large vessels that supply the anterior brain has been well established, the benefit of this therapy for vertebrobasilar artery occlusion, one of the most devastating forms of stroke, has been more controversial,” said Nogueira, endowed professor of neurology and neurosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh.

To address this uncertainty, the consortium of investigators, called VERITAS, focused on providing more precise, comprehensive and statistically powered estimates of the benefits of EVT with a particular focus on specific patient subgroups of clinical interest.

As the primary coordinating centre for the study, the Pitt team established common variables, definitions and trial specifications that laid the groundwork for a core pooled dataset from the four randomised controlled clinical trials ATTENTION, BAOCHE, BASICS and BEST of EVT for stroke due to vertebrobasilar artery occlusion.

Meta-analysis showed that at three months after the surgery, despite higher rates of brain bleeds with the procedure, EVT significantly reduced patient mortality and overall post-stroke disability, increasing patients’ functional independence. Notably, patients who underwent EVT were nearly 2 ½ times more likely to regain their ability to walk independently compared to patients who received the current medical standard of care, including intravenous thrombolytics.

“The results of the VERITAS collaboration are expected to influence treatment guidelines and impact stroke care globally,” Nogueira said. “We hope that this analysis sets the foundation for improved recovery after vertebrobasilar strokes and helps more people regain their independence after this catastrophic medical event.”

Source: University of Pittsburgh

New Blood Test for Ischaemic Stroke is a ‘Game-changer’

Ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0

A new study led by investigators from Brigham and Women’s Hospital has developed a new test by combining blood-based biomarkers with a clinical score to identify patients experiencing large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke with high accuracy. Their results are published in the journal Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology.

“We have developed a game-changing, accessible tool that could help ensure that more people suffering from stroke are in the right place at the right time to receive critical, life-restoring care,” said senior author Joshua Bernstock, MD, PhD, MPH, a clinical fellow in the Department of Neurosurgery at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Most strokes are ischaemic, in which blood flow to the brain is obstructed. LVO strokes are an aggressive type of ischaemic stroke that occurs when an obstruction occurs in a major artery in the brain, causing brain cells to rapidly die off from lack of oxygen. Major medical emergencies, LVO strokes require the swift treatment with mechanical thrombectomy, a surgical procedure that retrieves the blockage.

“Mechanical thrombectomy has allowed people that otherwise would have died or become significantly disabled be completely restored, as if their stroke never happened,” said Bernstock. “The earlier this intervention is enacted, the better the patient’s outcome is going to be. This exciting new technology has the potential to allow more people globally to get this treatment faster.”

The research team previously targeted two specific proteins found in capillary blood, one called glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which is also associated with brain bleeds and traumatic brain injury, and one called D-dimer. In this study, they demonstrated that the levels of these blood-based biomarkers combined with field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination (FAST-ED) scores could identify LVO ischaemic strokes while ruling out other conditions such as bleeding in the brain. Brain bleeds cause similar symptoms to LVO stroke, making them hard to distinguish from one another in the field, yet treatment for each is vastly different.

In this prospective, observational diagnostic accuracy study, the researchers looked at data from a cohort of 323 patients coded for stroke in Florida between May 2021 and August 2022. They found that combining the levels of the biomarkers GFAP and D-dimer with FAST-ED data less than six hours from the onset of symptoms allowed the test to detect LVO strokes with 93% specificity and 81% sensitivity. Other findings included that the test ruled out all patients with brain bleeds, suggesting that it may also eventually be used to detect intracerebral haemorrhage in the field.

Bernstock’s team also sees promising potential future use of this accessible diagnostic tool in low- and middle-income countries, where advanced imaging is not always available. It might also be useful in assessing patients with traumatic brain injuries. Next, they are carrying out another prospective trial to measure the test’s performance when used in an ambulance. They have also designed an interventional trial that leverages the technology to expedite the triage of stroke patients by having them bypass standard imaging and move directly to intervention.

“In stroke care, time is brain,” Bernstock said. “The sooner a patient is put on the right care pathway, the better they are going to do. Whether that means ruling out bleeds or ruling in something that needs an intervention, being able to do this in a prehospital setting with the technology that we built is going to be truly transformative.

Source: Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Vigorous Exercise Improves Walking in Chronic Stroke Patients

Photo by Kampus Production on Pexels

When 67-year-old Larry Christian suffered a sudden loss of balance, he was diagnosed with a haemorrhagic stroke, and referred to the University of Delaware’s Physical Therapy Clinic for rehabilitation. 

“Initially, I had a lot of balance problems that we worked pretty intensely to correct,” Christian said. 

He enrolled in a clinical trial at UD, led by co-investigator Darcy Reisman, professor and chair of the Department of Physical Therapy, that sought to explore whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) aids in improved gait post-stroke. UD was one of three sites selected for the clinical trial led by primary investigator and associate professor Pierce Boyne of the University of Cincinnati. Sandra Billinger, professor and vice chair of stroke translation research at the University of Kansas Medical Center, is also a co-investigator and represents the third site involved in the clinical trial. 

Now, seven years later, Christian is walking better. 

“Participating in this study got me to a point where I could walk better and even take a walk outside,” Christian said. “I’ve been pretty healthy all my life, and while I can’t play volleyball anymore, walking again made me feel great.”

Christian is among the lucky ones. Among 7 million stroke survivors in the US, fewer than 10% have adequate walking speed and endurance to complete normal daily activities like grocery shopping. 

Reisman said the results of the multi-million-dollar, five-year clinical trial showed HIIT helped more people than just Christian. The results, published in JAMA Neurology, show that chronic stroke survivors who engaged in high-intensity exercise with bursts of maximum-speed walking alternated with recovery periods saw a significant difference in their walking capacity over 12 weeks. The improvements were so dramatic Boyne and Reisman have secured a clinical trial grant renewal to triple the size of their study to 165 participants. 

She added HIIT looks different for each stroke survivor, and the optimal exercise program for each person with stroke remains unknown. 

“We want them to train at the fastest possible speed, which varies from person to person,” Reisman said. “But we don’t want them running.”

For those already walking at a reasonably fast pace, research associate Henry Wright in Reisman’s lab will add an incline or a weighted vest or wrap a bungee cord around their waist to create resistance. 

“It’s self-reported data, but participants tell me they have more energy, or they’re able to do more around the house, or they’re not winded when they go shopping,” Wright said. “By the end of the training, I can see their walking is smoother, they’re getting farther on clinical testing, and it’s rewarding to see their gains.”  

The results from the initial clinical trial showed Reisman and collaborators that HIIT was feasible and safe in a small group of stroke survivors, who saw sustained gains in walking capacity, more so than patients engaged in moderate-intensity exercise. 

However, further study of the intervention in larger populations is crucial to change the standard of care.

“Many physical therapists were trained during a time when patients with neurologic conditions, particularly stroke, were treated with kid gloves, partly because they say stroke is the heart attack of the brain,” Reisman said. “It’s common they also have cardiovascular conditions, so people tend to be extra careful with those patients in terms of pushing them.

“But what we know now is at least moderate-intensity, and likely high-intensity interval training, is essential not only for stroke survivors’ cardiovascular system but also for their brain,” Reisman said. “The evidence shows that intensity is linked to the release of neurotrophins in the brain that help the brain remodel after a stroke.” 

Kiersten McCartney, a physical therapist obtaining her doctorate in biomechanics and movement science, worked on the clinical trial with Reisman. She spent the 2022 Winter Session at Magee Rehabilitation Hospital in Philadelphia, helping them implement moderate-to-high-intensity exercise and saw the benefits first-hand. 

“I’ll never be able to say there’s no risk of heart attack. Even the fittest people can have a heart attack when exercising,” McCartney said. “Still, the data points to the idea that you’re doing more harm than good by not engaging your patients with stroke in high-intensity exercise when we talk about those longer-term outcomes.”

The HIIT-Stroke Trial 2 will continue to examine dosing to confirm whether a full 12 weeks of vigorous exercise is needed to see significant improvements in walking. Reisman and collaborators will identify whether differences in sex and other factors played a role in rehabilitation. If the five-year study results are similar and show significant gains from high-intensity interval exercise in a larger population, investigators would next work with NIH Strokenet to launch a nationwide clinical trial in people with stroke.  

“We’ve known about the value of moderate-intensity exercise for more than a decade, and it’s still not the standard of care,” Reisman said. “If we find that HIIT is the optimal intervention, the next phase would be the knowledge translation phase, where we’d systematically develop a methodology to get HIIT into clinics.” 

For HIIT to work as an intervention, Reisman said therapists will need the proper tools. She’s been pushing for commercially available heart rate monitors, placed around the chest during exercise, to be the standard of care in clinics for years.

“They’re already a standard of care for people in the community,” Reisman said. “Getting them into clinics is imperative so PTs can monitor patients’ heart rate the entire time they exercise. That constant monitoring gives therapists data on how a person is responding beyond visible signs and symptoms, and in turn, more peace of mind.” 

But beyond tools and training, Reisman said, it comes down to evidence and education. 

“If we have hundreds and hundreds of stroke survivors who’ve gone through our high-intensity exercise intervention, and we’ve seen no major adverse events – that will help,” Reisman said. “The more data we have to show therapists, the better we can implement this intervention that will change lives.”

Source: University of Delaware

New Compound Restores Lost Brain Function in Mice after Stroke

Photo by Kanashi ZD on Unsplash

An international study published recently in the journal Brain has reported promising results in restoring function lost in mice and rat models of stroke. Researchers were able to restore lost brain function using small molecules that in the future could potentially be developed into a stroke recovery therapy.

“Communication between nerve cells in large parts of the brain changes after a stroke and we show that it can be partially restored with the treatment,” says Tadeusz Wieloch, senior professor of neurobiology at Lund University in Sweden.

“Concomitantly, the rodents regain lost somatosensory functions, something that around 60 per cent of all stroke patients experience today. The most remarkable result is that the treatment began several days after a stroke,” Wieloch continues.

In an ischaemic stroke, lack of blood flow to affected parts of the brain lead to loss of function such as paralysis, sensorimotor impairment and vision and speech difficulties, but also to pain and depression.

There are currently no approved drugs that improve or restore the functions after a stroke, apart from clot-dissolving treatment in the acute phase (within 4.5 hours of the stroke). Some spontaneous improvements occur, but many stroke patients suffer chronic loss of function.

For example, about 60% of stroke sufferers, experience lost somatosensory functions such as touch and position sense.

The new study shows that rats that were treated with a class of substances that inhibit the metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR5), a receptor that regulates communication in the brain’s nerve cell network.

“Rodents treated with the GluR5 inhibitor regained their somatosensory functions,” says Tadeusz Wieloch, who led the study.

Two days after the stroke, ie when the damage had developed and function impairment was most prominent, the researchers started treating the rodents that exhibited the greatest impaired function.

“A temporary treatment effect was seen after just 30 minutes, but treatment for several weeks is needed to achieve a permanent recovery effect. Some function improvement was observed even when the treatment started 10 days after a stroke,” says Tadeusz Wieloch.

Importantly, sensorimotor functions improved, even though the extent of the brain damage was not diminished.

This, explains Tadeusz Wieloch, is due to the intricate network of nerve cells in the brain, known as the connectome – the way brain areas are inter connected and communicate form the basis for various brain functions.

“Impaired function after a stroke is due to cell loss, but also because of reduced activity in large parts of the connectome in the undamaged brain. The receptor mGluR5 is apparently an important factor in the reduced activity in the connectome, which is prevented by the inhibitor which therefore restores the lost brain function,” says Tadeusz Wieloch.

The results also showed that sensorimotor function was further improved if treatment with the mGluR5 inhibitor is combined with somatosensory training by housing several rodents in cages enriched with toys, chains, grids, and plastic tubes.

The researchers hope that in the future their results could lead to a clinical treatment that could be initiated a few days after an ischaemic stroke.

“Combined with rehabilitation training, it could eventually be a new promising treatment. However, more studies are needed. The study was conducted on mice and rats, and of course needs to be repeated in humans. This should be possible since several mGluR5 inhibitors have been studied in humans for the treatment of neurological diseases other than stroke, and shown to be tolerated by humans,” says Tadeusz Wieloch.

Source: Lund University

Study Discovers a New Driver of Brain Haemorrhage Formation

Source: CC0

A recent study has revealed a new culprit in the formation of brain haemorrhages that does not involve injury to the blood vessels, as previously believed. In the first-of-its kind study, researchers led by the University of California, Irvine discovered that interactions between aged red blood cells and brain capillaries can lead to cerebral microbleeds, offering deeper insights into how they occur and identifying potential new therapeutic targets for treatment and prevention.

The findings, published in the Journal of Neuroinflammation, describe how the team was able to watch the process by which red blood cells stall in the brain capillaries and then observe how the haemorrhage happens.

Cerebral microbleeds are associated with a variety of conditions that occur at higher rates in older adults, including hypertension, Alzheimer’s disease and ischaemic stroke.

“We have previously explored this issue in cell culture systems, but our current study is significant in expanding our understanding of the mechanism by which cerebral microbleeds develop,” said co-corresponding author Dr Mark Fisher, professor of neurology in UCI’s School of Medicine.

“Our findings may have profound clinical implications, as we identified a link between red blood cell damage and cerebral haemorrhages that occurs at the capillary level.”

The team exposed red blood cells to a chemical called tert-butyl hydroperoxide that caused oxidative stress; the cells were then marked with a fluorescent label and injected into mice.

Using two different methods, the researchers observed the red blood cells getting stuck in the brain capillaries and then being cleared out in a process called endothelial erythrophagocytosis.

As they moved out of the capillaries, microglia inflammatory cells engulfed the red blood cells, which led to the formation of a brain haemorrhage.

“It has always been assumed that in order for cerebral haemorrhage to occur, blood vessels need to be injured or disrupted. We found that increased red blood cell interactions with the brain capillaries represent an alternative source of development,” said co-corresponding author Xiangmin Xu, UCI professor of anatomy & neurobiology and director of the campus’s Center for Neural Circuit Mapping.

“We need to examine in detail the regulation of brain capillary clearance and also analyse how that process may be related to insufficient blood supply and ischaemic stroke, which is the most common form of stroke, to help advance the development of targeted treatments.”

Source: University of California – Irvine

Can Taking Statins after an Intracerebral Haemorrhage Reduce the Risk of Another Stroke?

Source: CC0

Patients who have had an intracerebral haemorrhage who take cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins may have a lower risk of having another stroke, especially ischaemic stroke, compared to people who also had an intracerebral haemorrhage but were not taking statins, according to a new study published in Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.

“Previous research has had mixed results on the risk of stroke in people who are taking statins and have already had a bleeding stroke, so we evaluated this further,” said study author David Gaist, MD, PhD, of the University of Southern Denmark in Odense and a member of the American Academy of Neurology. “We looked at whether use of statins after a bleeding stroke is associated with the risk of any additional stroke, including both those caused by bleeding and by blood clots. We found that those who used statins had a lower risk of stroke, notably ischaemic stroke, while there was no change in the risk of bleeding stroke.”

For the study, researchers looked at health records in Denmark and identified 15 151 people who had a first bleeding stroke.

People were followed from 30 days after their first bleeding stroke until the first occurrence of another stroke, death, or the end of follow-up, which on average lasted 3.3 years. Researchers used prescription data to determine information on statin use.

Researchers then compared 1959 people who had another stroke to 7400 people who did not have another stroke who were similar in age, sex and other factors. Of those who had another stroke, 757 people, or 39%, took statins compared to 3044 people, or 41%, of those who did not have a second stroke.

After adjusting for factors like hypertension, diabetes and alcohol use, statin use was associated with a 12% lower risk of another stroke.

Then they compared 1073 people who had an ischaemic stroke to 4,035 people who did not have another stroke. Of those who had an ischaemic stroke, 427 people, or 40%, took statins compared to 1687 people, or 42%, of those who did not have another stroke.

After adjusting for similar factors, statin use was associated with a 21% lower risk of an ischaemic stroke after the initial bleeding stroke.

They also compared 984 people who had another bleeding stroke to 3755 people who did not have another stroke. Of those who had a recurrent bleeding stroke, 385 people, or 39%, took statins compared to 1532 people, or 41%, of those who did not have another stroke.

After adjustments, researchers did not find a link between statin use and recurrent bleeding stroke.

“The results of our study are good news for people taking statins who have had a bleeding stroke,” Gaist added. “While we did find a lower risk of having another stroke, it is important to note that when looking at the data more closely, that lower risk was for ischaemic stroke. Still, we found no increased risk for bleeding stroke. More studies are needed to confirm our findings.”

A limitation of the study was that it only included the Danish population, which is primarily people of European ancestry, and may not be generalisable to people from other populations.

Source: American Academy of Neurology

Rethink Preventative Aspirin for Older Adults, Researchers Say

Photo by cottonbro studio: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-holding-white-round-medication-pill-4661296/

Low-dose aspirin is used as primary prevention for ischaemic stroke, but its protective effect weighed against the increased risk of bleeding events is controversial. A new secondary analysis of daily aspirin in older people found that, in this population, aspirin failed to reduce the risk for ischaemic stroke but increased it for intracranial bleeding. The findings were presented in JAMA Network Open.

The researchers analysed data from the ASPREE randomised clinical trial, the first large-scale trial to study the risks and benefits of 100mg daily aspirin in an older population, where increased bleeding risk may alter the balance of risks and benefits of aspirin. This is particularly relevant to intracerebral events because intracranial haemorrhage is harder to treat than ischaemic events and more frequently fatal or disabling. With previous aspirin trials in mostly younger participants, excess intracerebral haemorrhagic events was seen, though usually few in number and non-significant.

Cloud et al. performed a secondary analysis of the ASPREE trial, which included 19 114 older adults, and found a statistically significant 38% increase in intracranial bleeding resulting from a combination of haemorrhagic stroke and other causes of intracerebral haemorrhage among individuals randomised to aspirin. The difference in incidence of ischaemic stroke was not statistically significant.

While aspirin did not cause a statistically significant reduction in ischaemic stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89), there was a a statistically significant 38% increase in intracranial bleeding. Rates of intracranial bleeding from those assigned to aspirin (1.1%) were higher than placebo (0.8%). This came from an increase in a combination of subdural, extradural, and subarachnoid bleeding with aspirin (0.6%) compared with placebo (0.4%). Haemorrhagic stroke was recorded in 0.5% of those assigned to aspirin compared with 0.4% for placebo.

Absolute numbers of haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic events were small. Among 1000 individuals taking 100mg/day of low-dose aspirin over five years, there were 2.5 fewer ischaemic strokes at the expense of 3.5 cases of intracranial haemorrhage, but not statistically significant. No difference would be expected for overall stroke incidence or stroke mortality, but haemorrhagic stroke was associated with a mortality rate of nearly a third, compared to 7.7% for ischaemic stroke. Major extracranial haemorrhage was driven by the increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with aspirin compared with placebo, as previously found (Hazard Ratio, 1.87).

The researchers concluded that “there was no statistically significant benefit from aspirin in preventing stroke or any conventional stroke etiological subtype. However, aspirin significantly increased the overall risk of intracranial bleeding.”

Do not Automatically Bar Stroke Patients on Warfarin from EVT, Study Suggests

Source: Wikimedia CC0

Most ischaemic stroke patients taking the anticoagulant warfarin were no more likely than those not on the medication to experience a brain bleed when undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers report in a new study. The findings, published in JAMA, could help doctors better gauge the risk of EVT, widening the pool of patients for this intervention.

“Although not very common, patients taking warfarin may still experience a stroke. In clinical practice, it’s very possible that some physicians may withhold an endovascular thrombectomy because patients have been treated with warfarin before their strokes. Our study could increase the number of patients for whom this lifesaving and function-saving surgery would be appropriate,” said study leader Ying Xian, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at UT Southwestern.

EVT – a surgery that removes the clot by threading instruments through the blood vessels – is the most common treatment for acute ischaemic stroke. EVTs can sometimes cause potentially fatal symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), Dr Xian explained. Although warfarin is a known risk factor for bleeding, it’s been unknown whether the risk of sICH following EVT is higher for stroke patients who have been on the blood thinner.

To help answer this question, Dr Xian worked with Eric Peterson, MD, MPH, Professor of Internal Medicine at UTSW, along with colleagues from other medical institutions across the country. Together, they gathered data on 32 715 stroke patients who underwent EVT within six hours of stroke symptom onset between 2015 and 2020. Data came from the American Heart Association’s Get with the Guidelines-Stroke registry – the world’s largest registry of stroke patients.

The researchers compared a variety of outcomes for the 3087 patients who took warfarin prior to stroke and the 29 628 patients who did not take any blood thinner. They evaluated whether patients experienced sICH within 36 hours of their EVT procedure, whether they had a serious systemic haemorrhage, or whether they had other complications that required additional medical intervention or an extended hospital stay. Researchers also tracked complications from additional therapies that reintroduced blood flow in the brain, in-hospital deaths, and discharges to hospice care.

After adjusting for differences inherent to patients taking or not taking warfarin, the researchers found no difference in overall risk of sICH or other adverse outcomes in patients in these two groups. However, patients with an international normalised ratio (INR) greater than 1.7 – a measure of clotting tendency of blood in patients taking warfarin – the risk of experiencing sICH increased by about 4%.

Whether this effect translates into worse outcomes for patients is unclear, Dr Peterson said. Except for higher risk of bleeding, these patients with INRs greater than 1.7 were no more likely than those not taking warfarin to die or have worse functional outcomes at discharge.

“Physicians must evaluate stroke patients on a case-by-case basis to determine whether EVT is appropriate, but our study suggests that taking warfarin alone should not necessarily be a limiting factor,” he added.

Drs Xian and Peterson said they are planning to study whether other anticoagulants frequently taken by patients at risk of stroke might increase the risk of sICH or other serious complications following EVT for ischaemic stroke.

Source: UT Southwestern Medical Center