Tag: international travel

Categories : General Interest Mental HealthTags :

The Mental Health Benefits of Going on Holiday

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Daniel Eledut on Unsplash

For better mental health, music and other forms of relaxation have been shown to have positive benefits. Now, researchers have identified a previously overlooked way to improve mental health – going on holiday, a luxury many have abandoned since COVID.

In a new cross-disciplinary paper, researchers from Edith Cowan University (ECU) propose that we view tourism, as not just as a recreational experience but as an industry that can provide real health benefits.

The interdisciplinary collaboration found that many aspects of going on holiday could have a positive impact on those with mental health issues or conditions.

Led by researcher Dr Jun Wen, a diverse team of tourism, public health and marketing experts investigated how tourism could benefit those living with dementia.

“Medical experts can recommend dementia treatments such as music therapy, exercise, cognitive stimulation, reminiscence therapy, sensory stimulation and adaptations to a patient’s mealtimes and environment,” Dr Wen said.

“These are all also often found when on holidays. This research is among the first to conceptually discuss how these tourism experiences could potentially work as dementia interventions.”

According to Dr Wen, the varied nature of tourism meant there were many opportunities to incorporate treatments for conditions such as dementia. Being in new environments and having new experiences could provide cognitive and sensory stimulation, for example.

“Exercise has been linked to mental wellbeing and travelling often involves enhanced physical activity, such as more walking,” Dr Wen said.

“Mealtimes are often different on holiday: they’re usually more social affairs with multiple people and family-style meals have been found to positively influence dementia patients’ eating behaviour.

“And then there’s the basics like fresh air and sunshine increasing vitamin D and serotonin levels. Everything that comes together to represent a holistic tourism experience, makes it easy to see how patients with dementia may benefit from tourism as an intervention.”

Dr Wen said COVID’s impact on travel in recent years had raised questions about tourism’s value beyond lifestyle and economic factors.

“Tourism has been found to boost physical and psychological wellbeing,” he said. So, after COVID, it’s a good time to identify tourism’s place in public health — and not just for healthy tourists, but vulnerable groups.”

Dr Wen said he hoped that new research could begin to examine how tourism can enhance the lives of people with various conditions.

“We’re trying to do something new in bridging tourism and health science,” he said. “There will have to be more empirical research and evidence to see if tourism can become one of the medical interventions for different diseases like dementia or depression.

“So, tourism is not just about travelling and having fun; we need to rethink the role tourism plays in modern society.”

The article ‘Tourism as a dementia treatment based on positive psychology’ was published in Tourism Management.

Source: Edith Cowan University

Categories : COVIDTags :

Lateral Flow Tests now Approved for Travellers to England

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Blale Guidry on Unsplash

Fully vaccinated passengers arriving in England and most under 18s arriving from non red-list countries (which now includes South Africa) can use a lateral flow test (LFT) on or before day 2 of their arrival in England, the UK government has announced.

LFTs must be taken as soon as possible on the day of arrival in England or at the latest before the end of a passenger’s second day and can now be purchased from the list of private providers on GOV.UK from as little as £22 – significantly cheaper than PCR tests.

LFTs for international travel must be purchased from a private provider as NHS Test and Trace lateral flow tests cannot be used for international travel. Passengers who have already bought a PCR to use for travel do not need to buy another test as PCRs can still be used.

Passengers have to take a photo of their lateral flow test and booking reference supplied by the private provider, then send it back to them to verify the result. Failure to do so could result in a fine of £1000 (R20 000). It is also possible for passengers to book a test at some airport testing centres. People using PCR tests for travel will have their test reported by the company they purchase the test from.

Anyone who tests positive will need to isolate and take a confirmatory PCR test, at no additional cost to the traveller, which can be genomically sequenced to help identify new variants. PCR tests can be accessed free of charge by ordering in the usual way through NHS Test and Trace – via nhs.uk/coronavirus or by calling 119.  Test providers will be expected to advise people to self-isolate and direct people towards the NHS Test and Trace booking page.

In addition, all travellers must complete a passenger locator form beforehand, including providing a test booking reference number supplied by a testing provider.

However, these new rules apply only to those arriving in England: anyone travelling on to Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales, the Channel Islands or the Isle of Man within 10 days after arrival in England have to follow the rules for testing and quarantine in those places.

Those passengers who are not fully vaccinated with an authorised vaccine returning from a non-red list destination must still take a pre-departure test (antigen/PCR), a PCR test on day 2 and day 8 test and complete 10 days’ self-isolation (with the option of doing Test to Release on day 5).

Source: UK Government

Categories : COVIDTags :

SARS-CoV-2 Can be Detected in Aircraft Wastewater

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Lukas Souza on Unsplash

Australian researchers have found SARS-CoV-2 virus in wastewater samples from long haul flights arriving from outside the country, demonstrating that they can detect it even before passengers show symptoms.

The CSIRO and University of Queensland scientists worked with Qantas to show that wastewater surveillance can provide valuable data for public health agencies.

CSIRO lead author Dr Warish Ahmed said as global travel returns, testing wastewater of incoming flights could screen incoming passengers for COVID at points of entry.

“It provides an extra layer of data, if there is a possible lag in viral detection in deep nasal and throat samples and if passengers are yet to show symptoms,” Dr Ahmed said.

“The rapid on-site surveillance of wastewater at points of entry may be effective for detecting and monitoring other infectious agents that are circulating globally and provide alert to future pandemics.”

Co-author Professor Jochen Mueller from UQ’s Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences said wastewater testing could be a useful extra tool.

“The paper recommends that wastewater surveillance be used as part of an efficient clinical surveillance and quarantine system – providing multiple lines of evidence of the COVID infection status of passengers during international travel,” Professor Mueller said.

The study, published in Environment International, analysed wastewater samples from 37 Australian Government repatriation flights from COVID hotspots including India, France, UK, South Africa, Canada and Germany between December 2020 and March 2021.

The research found SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples from 24 of the 37 repatriation flights (65%) despite all passengers (except children under age five) having tested negative to the virus 48 hours before boarding. Virus is shed in the faeces of infected people about two to five days before showing symptoms.

Traces of SARS-CoV-2 can also be detected in wastewater from previously infected people who still shed the coronavirus, but are no longer infectious – although typically a weaker signal.

During 14 days of the passengers’ mandatory quarantine upon arrival in Australia, clinical tests identified only 112 COVID cases among the 6570 passengers (1.7%).

Monitoring of wastewater has a number of applications. Through its wastewater monitoring programme, the Durban University of Technology found that the recent unrest in South Africa was a superspreader event that drove up cases in KwaZulu-Natal.

Source: University of Queensland

Categories : COVIDTags :

UK Takes SA off its Red List for Travel

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Lucas Davies on Unsplash

On Thursday, the UK government announced that South Africa has come of the COVID red list, which has been cut from 54 to just seven.

Brazil and Mexico also come off the red list, which requires travellers to quarantine in an approved hotel at their cost for 10 full days – at a cost of £2285 for one person.  The seven countries remaining on the red list are Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, Ecuador, Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Vaccinated travellers from South Africa will be treated the same as returning fully-vaccinated UK residents so long as they have not visited a red-list country in the 10 days before arriving in England. All incoming travellers will still complete a passenger locator form.

UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said the changes begin on Monday and “mark the next step” in opening travel.

The UK’s travel rues have recently been simplified, with the amber list removed entirely, and advice against holidays changed for 32 countries. Arrivals from 37 more destinations will have their vaccination status certificates recognised, meaning they can avoid more expensive post-arrival testing requirements.

Speaking to the BBC, British expats Matt and Hannah Pirnie, who have lived in South Africa for a decade, said the separation has been difficult.

“It’s been a long pandemic for us. Not seeing family, not being allowed to go back, but more importantly grandparents not being able to come here and see their grandkids. It’s been a long two years,” Matt said.

“First of all when all the aeroplanes stopped initially – that was quite anxiety provoking – and then to be put on the red list for so long has just been quite hard to wrap your head around why,” Hannah adds.

Announcing the latest changes, Mr Shapps said the government was “making it easier for families and loved ones to reunite”. He said that with fewer restrictions “and more people travelling, we can all continue to move safely forward together along our pathway to recovery”.

In addition to the much-abbreviated red list, the government said passengers would soon be able to use a photograph of a lateral flow test as a minimum requirement to verify a negative result, and the more expensive ‘day two’ PCR test was to be replaced with a lateral flow test.

Source: BBC News

Categories : COVIDTags :

SA Presses UK Over Travel Restrictions as Lockdown Eases

On By ModernMedia
Image by Quicknews

As the country gets back to Level 1 lockdown, pressure is mounting on the UK to revise its travel restrictions for SA.

The drop to Level 1 was announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa on Thursday, September 30. The restrictions include a midnight to 4am curfew, and restaurants to close at 11pm. Alcohol sales are likewise permitted until 11pm, and large events of up to 750 people indoors and 2000 people outdoors can be held.

This is accompanied by a renewed vaccine drive, to reach a goal of vaccinating 70% of the adult population by year end, President Ramaphosa announced.

“To reach our goal we need to administer an additional 16 million vaccine doses this year, which amounts to around 250 000 first dose vaccinations every single workday of every week until mid-December,” he said.

Meanwhile, President Ramaphosa is hopeful that SA will be taken off of the UK’s ‘red list’, which means travellers travelling or returning to the UK must quarantine for ten days in a government-designated hotel at a cost of over £2000 (R40 500). The tourist industry, which has lost half a million jobs, is pressing for SA to be removed from the UK’s red list in time for the festive season, which sees many British travellers coming to enjoy the summer here.

Former UK cabinet minister Peter Hain this week also called on the UK to release SA from its travel red list, calling it a “ludicrous” decision, as it was not backed up by science.

“SA has a low infection rate: just a tenth of the infections in the UK and a similarly low fraction compared with much of Europe.  It has only one variant in circulation, exactly the same variant as in the UK, Delta,” Hain said in a statement on Thursday.

Ramaphosa said that spoke with UK prime minister Boris Johnson on Thursday, and was hopeful of a “positive outcome” in a few days.

“Our greatest priority now is to ensure that the economy recovers as quickly as possible so that we can create jobs and help businesses to get back on their feet,” he said.

Source: BusinessTech

Categories : COVIDTags :

COVID Hit South Africa Harder Than Expected Despite Preparedness

On By ModernMedia
Image by Quicknews

New research finds African countries, assessed as being least vulnerable to an epidemic were the worst affected by COVID, particularly South Africa.

A team of researchers from the NIHR Global Health Research Unit Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa (TIBA) worked with the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region to identify factors affecting mortality rates during Africa’s first two COVID waves and the timing of the first reported cases. The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, found that countries with greater urban populations and strong international travel links were worst affected by the pandemic. Mortality rates and levels of restrictions, such as lockdowns and travel bans, were found to be lowest in countries previously thought to be at greatest risk from COVID.

Professor Mark Woolhouse, TIBA Director, who co-led the study, said, “Our study shows very clearly that multiple factors influence the extent to which African countries are affected by COVID. These findings challenge our understanding of vulnerability to pandemics.

“Our results show that we should not equate high levels of preparedness and resilience with low vulnerability.

“That seemingly well-prepared, resilient countries have fared worst during the pandemic is not only true in Africa; the result is consistent with a global trend that more developed countries have often been particularly hard hit by COVID.”

Among 44 countries of the WHO African Region with available data, South Africa had the highest mortality rate during the first wave between May and August 2020, at 33.3 deaths recorded per 100k population. Cape Verde and Eswatini had the next highest rates at 17.5 and 8.6 deaths per 100k, respectively. At 0.26 deaths recorded per 100,000, the lowest mortality rate was in Uganda.

South Africa also recorded the highest mortality rate during the second wave between December 2020 and February 2021, at 55.4 deaths per 100,000. Eswatini and Botswana recorded rates of 39.8 and 17.7 deaths per 100,000, respectively. The lowest rate was in Mauritius, which recorded no deaths during the second wave.

“The early models which predicted how COVID would lead to a massive number of cases in Africa were largely the work of institutions not from our continent. This collaboration between researchers in Africa and Europe underlines the importance of anchoring analysis on Africa’s epidemics firmly here,” said Dr. Matshidiso Moeti, WHO Regional Director for Africa and co-author. “We can no longer focus our understanding of disease transmission purely on the characteristics of a virus—COVID operates within a social context which has a major impact on its spread.”

Countries with high rates of HIV were also more likely to have higher mortality rates. This may be because people with HIV often have other health conditions that put them at greater risk from COVID, the team suggests.

The weak association between mortality rate and the timing or severity of government-imposed social restrictions shows the varied impact and enforcement across the region, making a consistent impact pattern difficult to discern. Restrictions during peaks of infection are well documented to have interrupted transmission in the region.

The findings show that the earliest recorded cases of COVID were in countries where most people live in urban areas, with strong international travel links and greater testing capacity. Algeria was the first of 47 African countries to report a case, on 25 February 2020. Most countries had recorded cases by late March 2020, with Lesotho the last to report one, on 14 May 2020.

Higher death rates were observed during the second wave, compared with the first. The infection peak during the second wave was also higher, with 675 deaths across the continent on 18 January 2021 compared with 323 during the first wave peak on 5 August 2020. Potential under-reporting was accounted for in the analysis.

Source: University of Edinburgh

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

International Travellers at Risk of MDR Bacteria

On By ModernMedia

International travellers are at risk of picking up a number of drug-resistant pathogens, according to a new European study.

In the COVID pandemic, international travel has become a distant memory for most of those used to it. As restrictions are lifted and international travel resumes, travellers are still at risk from other dangerous pathogens. In recent years, the rise of intestinal multidrug resistant gram-negative (MDR-GN) bacteria around the world poses a serious health threat, with MDR clones of E.coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae threatening more antibiotic resistant infections around the world. The spread of MDR-GN is a known threat in long-term care facilities, with residents forming a reservoir for the microbes but is also common in international travel as well. It is well documented that international travel results in the spread of multidrug-resistant E. coli, with up to 80% of travellers returning from high-risk regions being colonised by MDR-GN bacteria for up to a year. However, the existing research only compared participants before and after travel. A group of researchers from Universities of Basel, Birmingham, Helsinki and Oslo, and the Wellcome Sanger Institute set out to investigate the spread of such bacteria on a day by day basis.

Over a period of three weeks, the researchers monitored the health of a group of European travellers in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic by analysing daily information returns and stool samples. They found that by the end of the study period, 70% of the travellers had been colonised. The bacterial strains colonised travellers staying at the same hotel and spending time in one another’s company. In one case, a participant was colonised by taking a shower in another’s bathroom.

“International travel is strongly linked to the spread of MDR-GN bacteria, with transmission highest in India and Southeast Asia, Africa and South America,” said senior study author Professor Alan McNally, University of Birmingham. “Travellers visiting these high-risk regions are at substantial risk of acquiring the bacteria. Colonisation by MDR-GN bacteria is a highly dynamic process. We found constant ‘competition’ between circulating strains acquired by individual hosts and the travelers’ ‘native’ bacteria. Travellers can pick up the bacteria even during short visits and further spread the strains after returning home.”

All of the participants had acquired extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) during their stay in Laos. ESBL enzymes create resistance within the body to most beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. Infections with ESBL-producing organisms have proved difficult to treat. Also, all but one participant acquired multiple strains of bacteria with 83 unique strains identified (53 E. coli, 10 Klebsiella, 20 other ESBL-GN species), with up to four other participants sharing strains.

Study co-senior author, Professor Jukka Corander, at the University of Oslo and the Wellcome Sanger Institute, commented: “Our study reveals the true scale and complexity at which drug-resistant bacteria colonise the intestinal tract during travel, demonstrating that it has been seriously underestimated previously.

“In addition, several of our participants lost some of their travel-acquired ESBL-GN strains while still abroad – indicating that previous studies solely employing pre- and post-travel sampling have under-reported the extent to which travellers are colonised by ESBL-GN.”

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Kantele, A., et al. (2021) Dynamics of intestinal multidrug-resistant bacteria colonisation contracted by visitors to a high-endemic setting: a prospective, daily, real-time sampling study. The Lancet Microbe. doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30224-X.