A University of Minnesota Medical School research team has found that giving iron supplements to children living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in sub-Saharan Africa could be an important first step in optimising brain development.
The study, published in Lancet HIV, demonstrates that iron, while often withheld from children with HIV due to fear of increasing infection risk, is in fact beneficial. This finding paves the way for future research examining iron’s role in neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with HIV.
“With the success and widespread availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART), children with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa are living longer, and optimising their brain development is a new public health imperative,” said Sarah Cusick, PhD, associate professor at the U of M Medical School and a member of the Masonic Institute for the Developing Brain.
Between May 2018 and November 2019, researchers enrolled 200 children with HIV and anaemia who had received ART for at least six months. The study participants were randomly chosen to receive either iron supplements or a placebo for three months. Children who received iron had higher haemoglobin concentrations and better markers of iron nutrition than those who received the placebo. There also was no evidence of increased risk of infection.
According to Dr Cusick, further research is needed to assess brain development and infection risk over a longer period of time.
A therapy showing promise to help control tuberculosis (TB) does not interfere with combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), according to research by Texas Biomedical Research Institute (Texas Biomed) which was recently published in JCI Insight.
“This is an important hurdle that this host-directed therapy had to clear in order to help patients battling both HIV and TB,” said study leader Professor Smriti Mehra, PhD of Texas Biomed.
TB is responsible for more than 1.3 million deaths worldwide every year. Dr. Mehra and her team have been investigating a therapy currently used in cancer as a potential treatment for patients with drug-resistant TB and/or comorbid HIV. While many cases of TB can be controlled with months of antibiotics, the infection can return in people who are immunocompromised as a result of HIV. Now that cART is so effective at controlling HIV, a resurging TB infection can often be deadly to those individuals.
Dr Mehra is studying a host-directed therapy that blocks or inhibits an immune system protein naturally found in the body. The protein, called IDO (short for Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase), normally suppresses the immune system, preventing it from causing excessive inflammation and organ damage. Inhibiting IDO for short intervals of time has led to more successful cancer treatments. Dr. Mehra’s team has previously shown the same approach improves control of TB in conjunction with antibiotics.
This current study in nonhuman primates with both TB and simian immunodeficiency virus, the nonhuman primate version of HIV, showed the IDO inhibitor does not interfere with cART.
“There was no increase in viral load in animals given cART and the IDO inhibitor, compared with animals only given cART, proving the inhibitor is safe to give to patients with HIV,” Dr. Mehra said.
Now that the researchers have shown the inhibitor works well in conjunction with TB antibiotics and with cART separately, they plan to study how it performs when given in conjunction with both antibiotics and cART together. This treatment regimen is standard for patients with both HIV and active TB. Dr. Mehra said that longer-term studies are also needed to confirm there are no unintended side effects.
The IDO inhibitor is already FDA-approved for use in patients with cancer, which shortens the path to potential approval for patients with TB/HIV when compared with developing a brand-new drug.
The African Centre for Disease Control and World Health Organization have raised the alarm following a drastic uptick in mpox cases. This surge is being driven by a new strain of the virus. Elri Voigt reports about what we know so far and potential implications for South Africa.
Mpox, a viral illness first identified in Africa in 1970, made headlines in 2022 when it spread across the globe for the first time. Since then, the outbreak has evolved, with multiple strains of the virus circulating in different countries. A new strain, known as clade Ib, first discovered in the Democratic of the Republic of Congo (DRC), is responsible for much of the most recent surge in mpox cases.
These recent developments are complex, and the situation is likely to change. This was the common theme of a special session on the mpox outbreak during the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Committee for Africa meeting at the end of August. This session took place two weeks after the WHO declared the outbreak to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
“We don’t have one outbreak. We have multiple outbreaks in one,” Dr Jean Kaseya, the Director General of the African Centre for Disease Control (CDC) remarked.
These outbreaks are caused by different clades of the mpox virus. Clades are a classification system based on the genetic similarities between different strains of a virus, explained Professor Tulio de Oliveira, Director of the Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation (CERI) at Stellenbosch University (SU). “So, what it means is that when we see a genetic change [in a virus] that’s really visible and that may have impacted it, normally we call it a different clade or genotype or variant,” he said.
This is similar to classifying different strains of SARS-CoV-2 as variants, Dr Duduzile Ndwandwe, a molecular biologist working for Cochrane South Africa, an intramural research unit within the South African Medical Research Council, told Spotlight.
She explained that the different mpox clades and sub-clades have mutated so they have genetic differences but still fall under the umbrella of mpox.
“In a nutshell…it’s just talking about the differences in the genome sequence of the virus, how many mutations [it has] or how big the mutations are in that virus’s strain of mpox,” she said.
‘Jump in evolution’
Dr Aida Sivro, senior scientist at the Centre for the AIDS programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), in 2022 told Spotlight that there are two clades of the mpox virus, which were then referred to as the Central African Clade (clade I) and the West African Clade (clade II).
Since then, clade I went through a big jump in evolution and a sub-clade emerged in the DRC, now called clade Ib, De Oliveira told Spotlight. The previous outbreak in 2022 was mostly driven by another sub-clade called clade IIb.
To further complicate matters, there’s a third strain of the virus also circulating – clade Ia.
At the moment, the DRC accounts for about 90% of mpox cases in the African Region, according to Dr Fiona Braka, the Emergency Response Manager for WHO’s AFRO region. She explained that right now the situation is not fully understood because a lack of diagnostics and testing capabilities is limiting understanding of the true burden of disease.
What we do know, she said, is that there are two distinct outbreaks in the DRC. Based on the information currently available, clade Ia is circulating in regions in the country where mpox is considered endemic and affecting mostly children. While clade Ib is spreading mostly among adults in the eastern provinces of South Kivu and North Kivu.
The clade Ib strain has since spread from the DRC to neighbouring countries Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda and Kenya, according to Braka. Sweden and Thailand have also identified one case each.
As of 1 September, the WHO reported that there have been 3 751 confirmed cases of mpox and 32 deaths across 14 countries in African in 2024 alone. But there are many more suspected cases of mpox that have not been tested.
Implications for South Africa
De Oliveira said at this point, South Africa shouldn’t be overly concerned about mpox, but it should be alert. The best way to do this is to make sure the public know what the symptoms are so they can present for diagnosis and treatment if they suspect they have the virus.
In a similar vein, Ndwandwe said the public shouldn’t panic, but we as a country need to remain vigilant. She added that because clade Ib is spreading on the African continent, there is a risk of it spreading to South Africa through cross-border travel, making it a public health concern.
This year, 24 cases of mpox have been reported in South Africa. Three people have died, while 19 have recovered. Two people are still considered to have active disease, with the most recent case identified in early August.
But this doesn’t necessarily mean there aren’t more cases of mpox in the country. “What we do suspect is that we may have milder cases that are actually not reported,” Nevashan Govender, the operation manager of the Emergency Operations Center at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) told Spotlight.
He said so far, all the cases in the country have been caused by clade IIb and no cases of clade Ib have been identified.
A polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) test is the gold standard test used to determine whether someone has mpox. But genome sequencing would need to be done to identify what clade they have.
Lots of unknowns around new strain
At the moment, there are a lot of unknowns around clade Ib.
What is of concern, according to Braka is the severity of disease seen especially in people who are immunocompromised and in pregnant women and children. Ndwandwe added to this and said there is a concern that clade Ib has higher fatality rates than clade IIb.
De Oliveira cautioned against jumping to conclusions about the severity of this new clade without sufficient data. He said we don’t know for sure yet if clade Ib is causing more severe disease than IIb. What we do know from mpox in general, he said, is that when someone is immunocompromised in some way, they tend to develop more severe symptoms.
Govender echoed De Oliveira’s caution that we don’t yet know enough about clade Ib to say definitively if it is for example more transmissible than other clades
“It’s not to say that it isn’t [more transmissible], but there is just not a lot of evidence stating that it is absolutely true…There’s a lot of knowledge and information gaps,” he said.
The NICD in a recent update also stressed that there are a lot of unknowns about this new strain. It added: “South Africa continues to prioritise enhanced surveillance and raising awareness for mpox.”
The state of vaccines and treatment for mpox
Spotlight reported previously that the smallpox vaccine, which hasn’t been routinely administered in South Africa since the 1980s when smallpox was eradicated, is thought to offer some degree of protection against mpox. However, it’s difficult to predict just how much protection the smallpox vaccine would provide, Sirvo told Spotlight for that previous article.
There are currently three vaccines against mpox that have been approved in some countries, a spokesperson from the vaccine alliance Gavi told Spotlight. These are LC16m8, JYNNEOS and ACAM2000.
LC16m8 is a third-generation small pox vaccine manufactured by KM Biologics. According to WHO, from 2022 it had mainly been used in Japan.
The JYNNEOS vaccine is a third-generation smallpox vaccine, manufactured by Bavarian Nordic, Ndwandwe said, and it was used during the outbreak in 2022. She added that this vaccine is considered the preferred option due to its safety profile and targeted protection against mpox.
ACAM2000 is a second-generation vaccine for smallpox and manufactured by Emergent BioSolutions. But it was only approved by the FDA for use in those at high risk for mpox at the end of August this year. It was not widely used during the 2022 outbreak but was available in some places under a compassionate use protocol (a means of providing medicines or vaccines that have not yet been registered).
In 2022, the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) recommended that JYNNEOS be used as the primary vaccine against mpox because it was associated with fewer side effects than ACAM2000.
While these vaccines exist, it doesn’t mean everyone can access them easily. Countries on the African continent have so far relied on vaccine donations facilitated by the WHO, with an initial 10 000 doses expected to arrive in Africa sometime this month.
Vaccine manufacturers KM Biologics and Bavarian Nordic have submitted proposals to the WHO for emergency use listing (EUL), according to WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. He added this will allow UNICEF and the vaccine alliance GAVI to buy the vaccines to supply to countries that haven’t issued their own national regulatory approval yet.
The treatment options for mpox are also limited. According to this WHO factsheet on mpox, some antivirals have received emergency use authorisation in some countries and are being evaluated in clinical trials. However, so far there is no proven effective antiviral treatment for mpox.
Tecovirimat, which was approved to treat smallpox, is one of these antivirals being evaluated. According to the CDC, studies in animals have shown the antiviral might help treat mpox but it is still considered an investigational drug for mpox. The drug has been used in some cases of severe mpox.
When asked about this, Ndwandwe agreed more research needs to be conducted to fully understand the evidence around using Tecovirimat. “But what we know now is that the fact that it was authorised for compassionate use, there is some benefit to using that treatment, given that there isn’t any other [treatment,” she said.
Mpox vaccine and treatment availability in South Africa
According to De Oliveira, a small batch of vaccines against mpox and an antiviral drug were made available to South Africa through donations during the outbreak earlier this year.
But the country would need more vaccines if cases increase to protect those at risk for severe disease.
At the moment, South Africa does not have access to any mpox vaccines and has asked for a donation of 40 000 vaccine doses, Foster Mohale, spokesperson for the health department told Spotlight. The country has requested the JYNNEOS vaccine, based on the recommendation by the National Advisory Group on Immunisation.
He added that South Africa’s request to its international partners and the WHO is ongoing support with access to tecovirimat should the need increase. He also requested the WHO’s assistance in procuring the 40 000 vaccine doses to vaccinate high-risk groups if mpox cases increase.
When asked if the department will be entirely reliant on donations of mpox vaccines or would seek to procure its own if cases increase, Mohale said it depends. “South Africa has been in communication with the vaccine manufacturer, Bavarian Nordic, and will consider procurement if needed,” he added.
Because there is a shortage of mpox vaccines and treatment and uncertainty about the sustainability of donated supplies, Ndwandwe said: “Our best defence at this point in time is to prevent [the spread of mpox cases] as much as possible and detect the cases as they start, early on.”
Symptoms of mpox
Govender said the NICD is urging people not to panic but to stay informed on the signs and symptoms of mpox using some of the accurate information available from either the National Department of Health or the NICD.
“The first line of defence for any public health emergency and outbreak comes from when people take initiative to protect themselves,” he said.
Mpox, which is spread by close contact, either household or sexual contact, with someone who has the virus, could initially manifest in flu-like symptoms or the characteristic mpox rash. These include a fever, sore throat, muscle aches, headaches and swollen lymph nodes, according to the WHO factsheet on mpox. The rash starts flat and then becomes a blister filled with fluid, which eventually dries and falls off. The rash can occur on someone’s palms or soles of their feet, face, mouth and throat and sometimes the genital areas.
Children, pregnant women and those who are immunocompromised are most at risk for developing severe disease or dying, the factsheet stated. This includes people living with HIV whose viral load is not well controlled.
Mpox is a virus and as with all viral infections it’s the immune system that fights it off, Ndwandwe explained. However, if someone is immunocompromised, so has a weakened immune system, there is a greater chance that the mpox virus will overtake their immune system and cause severe disease.
This is one of the reasons why we would be concerned about the disease in South Africa, Professor Helen Rees, the Co-Chair of the Incident Management Team (IMT) on mpox, previously told eNCA.
“We have many people living with HIV in the country, many of whom are on antiretroviral therapy, their immune system is good. But we have many others, who don’t know what their status is and might be vulnerable to severe mpox,” she said.
Despite some improvement over the past three years, the North West province continues to experience medicine shortages, according to a survey by a community clinic monitoring initiative. We unpack the latest findings and ask why shortages persist in the province.
Some people in need of HIV or tuberculosis (TB) medicines were sent home empty handed after visiting clinics in the North West. This is according to the latest survey of public healthcare services in the province published by community-led clinic monitoring group Ritshidze. The survey data was collected in April and May this year.
Of the roughly 490 000 people living with HIV in North West, around 380 000 (77%) are on antiretroviral treatment, according to figures from Thembisa, the leading mathematical model of HIV in South Africa. Antiretroviral treatment is recommended for everyone living with the virus.
According to Ritshidze, besides HIV and TB medicines, other commonly reported stockouts at clinic-level include pain medicines (such as Paracetamol and Ibuprofen), cardiac medicines (such as Aspirin), contraceptives, dry stock (gauze, bandages, needles), maternal health medicines, psychiatric medicines, and different vaccines.
Out of the 72 facilities surveyed in the province, medicine stockouts lasting one to three months were reported at 20 and stockouts lasting three to six months were reported at six.
‘Failed to comply’
The North West health department, according to Ritshidze, has failed to comply with national guidelines recommending that people living with HIV should be provided with a three or more month supply of antiretrovirals at a time. They found that 71% of people surveyed in 2024 received antiretroviral refills of three to six months – in each of the previous three years this number was below 30%. There was large differences between districts, with 97% of people surveyed in Bojanala district reporting getting a 3 month supply of ARVs — compared to 37% in Dr Kenneth Kaunda.
Giving people longer antiretroviral refills like this means people do not have to visit health facilities as often to collect their medicines.
Various factors influence giving more people longer antiretroviral refills, Tebogo Lekgethwane, Director of Media and Communications in the province’s health department, told Spotlight.
A crucial factor, he said, is that patients must have a good track record of collecting their medication as well as a history of a documented undetectable viral load. “There’s therefore a criteria for multi-month supply which includes the fact that patients should have been on treatment for six months, they are compliant and clinically stable,” said Lekgethwane.
No “crisis” of medicine shortages
While the year-on-year comparisons should not be overinterpreted – Ritshidze themselves advise caution – the numbers nevertheless provide some indication that when it comes to medicines stockouts things are trending in the right direction. The total number of stockouts in the province reported to Ritshidze plunged from 895 in 2021 to 148 in 2024 – over the same period stockouts of HIV medicines went from 115 to 19 and stockouts of TB medicines from 28 to 7.
Lekgethwane was at pains to point out that Ritshidze’s findings do not necessarily represent the actual picture of the entire province. He said that the department believes that the Ritshidze report is subjective and relies on isolated incidents. These incidents, Lekgethwane said, are often quickly addressed.
“The current provincial medicine availability report shows that medicine availability has stabilised above 80%. As at the end of June 2024, ARV stock was at 89.5%, Expanded Programme on Immunisation and Contraceptives remained above 90%, TB treatment at 79%, Oncology treatment at 81.7% and Diabetes Mellitus at 85.8%. Therefore the province does not have a crisis of medicine shortages,” he said.
Asked what exactly these percentages mean, Lekgethwane said that it indicates the actual medicines stock available in the province in relation to what is required.
A pharmacy expert consulted by Spotlight further explained that the percentage indicates the percentage of medicines on a list or in a class that is available in the province.
The way these numbers are tracked is somewhat tricky. Firstly, if a clinic is supposed to have 10 different HIV medicines in stock, but they only have 8 in stock, then its HIV medicines availability would be at 80% (having a single pack of a medicine counts as having it in stock). When many facilities are considered together, as with an entire province like North West, the key indicator looks at what percentage of those facilities have medicines availability above 90%. We thus understand the figures shared by Lekgethwane to mean that 89.5% of facilities, depots and so on in the province have HIV medicines availability above 90%.
Catching up with payments
Past medicine shortages in the province were partly attributed to companies ceasing delivery of medicine due to non-payment of invoices. While the North West health department was under National Department of Health administration in 2020, the offices at the Mmabatho Medical Depot was raided. The search uncovered a number of unpaid invoices worth millions, some dating back to 2014. One unpaid invoice was for more than R16 million.
Bolstered by a Pharmaceutical Intervention Team to address medicine shortages, Lekgethwane said the department’s payments system is now in top shape.
“Payment of suppliers has remained a priority and the finance unit has assisted the team by making good progress on payments of supplier accounts. The unit continues to investigate and intervene when suppliers indicate their account status to the pharmacies.
“This has led to an increased number of deliveries from suppliers to the depot and increased direct deliveries to pharmacies from contracted companies as well as deliveries of main orders, allocation of orders and emergency orders from the depot to the pharmacies,” he said.
“The Department can confidently confirm that the financial management of pharmaceuticals has been improved resulting in 97% of 2024/2025 accruals being paid and remaining with only two accounts that are on hold. The two accounts that are on hold will only be paid once their compliance requirements are sorted,” said Lekgethwane.
He said that the intervention team has the capacity to assess and intervene, in among others, pharmaceutical supply chain issues, system effectiveness, distribution and delivery processes, storage capacity, human resource capacity and safety issues.
Lekgethwane said the team’s first priority was to assess the Mmabatho Medical Depot before moving onto pharmacies in hospitals and clinics across the province.
Getting medicines to rural areas
While Ritshidze also raised concern around transportation for the delivery of medicines, the department said transportation has never been a challenge.
“There are contracted service providers who deliver to the Mmabatho Medical Depot and the depot delivers to hospitals. Clinics receive their medicine from their referral hospital,” said Lekgethwane.
“However, the department is currently implementing the bulk pharmacies for districts to bring medicines closer to facilities”, he added. A bulk pharmacy is a medicine storage facility which serves as a medical depot. It is situated in the districts and helps with bringing medicines closer to rural areas so that medicines do not have to be transported from major towns.
In this regard, Lekgethwane said the Dr Kenneth District Bulk Pharmacy was recently opened and soon the General De la Rey Bulk Pharmacy will open.
He said the department is confident that the use of these bulk pharmacies will improve medicine storage and distribution capacity.
Shortage of pharmacists and pharmacy assistants
The Ritshidze report found that only 9% of surveyed facilities had a pharmacist and only 18% had a pharmacist assistant. Government regulations state that either pharmacists or pharmacy assistants should be responsible for stock receiving orders and updating the stock visibility system. However, Ritshidze found that enrolled nurses, enrolled nurse assistants, facility managers, and even cleaners acted in that capacity at some clinics.
The province has a 6% vacancy rate for pharmacists while 342 are currently employed, according to the 2024/2025 health department annual performance plan tabled in the North West Provincial Legislature earlier this month. The plan states that the department’s organisational structure makes provision for 10 pharmacists to be appointed in the province for every 100 000 uninsured individuals.
The DA’s Hendriette van Huyssteen says there is a challenge of pharmacists and pharmacy assistants where there are clusters of less than 10 000 uninsured individuals (where one pharmacist would be allocated for 10 000 uninsured individuals) and the clinics servicing them are far removed from one another.
“With the NHI [National Health Insurance] being signed into law, the number of pharmacists will become only a greater challenge. The cost per pharmacist employee stands at R765 000.00 per annum. It is unclear as to where the funding would come from for the remuneration of the additional pharmacists needed under the NHI, as even the NHI Act is unclear in this regard,” she said.
Notwithstanding the issue of budget constraints, the training of more pharmaceutical staff is integral to having fully functional health systems, said Professor Andrew Robinson. He is a deputy dean in the Faculty of Health Sciences at North West University (NWU). He was previously a deputy director general in the North West health department.
“To improve the pharmaceutical skills in the province, the NWU must ensure it aligns its pharmacy training to address the skill needs of the provincial health department to ensure equitable health service delivery to all, which is necessary for successful implementation of the NHI,” he said.
An experimental drug originally developed to treat cancer may help clear HIV from infected cells in the brain, according to a new study published in the journal Brain. For the first time, researchers at Tulane University found that a cancer drug significantly reduced levels of SIV, the nonhuman primate equivalent of HIV, in the brain by targeting and depleting certain immune cells that harbour the virus.
This discovery marks a significant step toward eliminating HIV from hard-to-reach reservoirs where the virus evades otherwise effective treatment.
“This research is an important step in tackling brain-related issues caused by HIV, which still affect people even when they are on effective HIV medication,” said lead study author Woong-Ki Kim, PhD, associate director for research at Tulane National Primate Research Center. “By specifically targeting the infected cells in the brain, we may be able to clear the virus from these hidden areas, which has been a major challenge in HIV treatment.”
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is an essential component of successful HIV treatment, but the virus persists in “viral reservoirs” in the brain, liver, and lymph nodes, where it remains out of reach of ART.
The brain has been a particularly challenging area for treatment due to the blood-brain barrier preventing treatments from reaching the virus. In addition, macrophages are extremely long-lived, making them difficult to eradicate once they become infected.
Infection of macrophages is thought to contribute to neurocognitive dysfunction, experienced by nearly half of those living with HIV. Eradicating the virus from the brain is critical for comprehensive HIV treatment and could significantly improve the quality of life for those with HIV-related neurocognitive problems.
Researchers focused on macrophages, a type of white blood cell that harbours HIV in the brain. By using a small molecule inhibitor to block a receptor that increases in HIV-infected macrophages, the team successfully reduced the viral load in the brain. This approach essentially cleared the virus from brain tissue, providing a potential new treatment avenue for HIV.
The small molecule inhibitor used, BLZ945, has previously been studied for therapeutic use in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and brain cancer, but never before in the context of clearing HIV from the brain.
The study, which took place at the Tulane National Primate Research Center, utilised three groups to model human HIV infection and treatment: an untreated control group, and two groups treated with either a low or high dose of the small molecule inhibitor for 30 days. The high-dose treatment lead to a notable reduction in cells expressing HIV receptor sites, as well as a 95-99% decrease in viral DNA loads in the brain .
In addition to reducing viral loads, the treatment did not significantly impact microglia, the brain’s resident immune cells, which are essential for maintaining a healthy neuroimmune environment. It also did not show signs of liver toxicity at the doses tested.
The next step for the research team is to test this therapy in conjunction with ART to assess its efficacy in a combined treatment approach. This could pave the way for more comprehensive strategies to eradicate HIV from the body entirely.
One of the biggest stories in HIV in the last year was that a class of medicines called statins could help reduce cardiovascular disease in people living with the virus. In response, treatment guidelines in the United States were quickly updated, but the picture is more complicated in South Africa. Spotlight’s Elri Voigt explores why the case for widespread use of statins by people living with HIV is less compelling in South Africa than in some other countries.
People living with HIV, provided they are stable on antiretroviral therapy, are affected by the same diseases as those who don’t have HIV, including cardiovascular disease, says Professor Mpiko Ntsekhe, head of Cardiology at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town.
The key difference, he says, is that although both groups of people get the same spectrum of diseases, people living with HIV get those diseases more frequently and earlier. One way to think about this, he explains, is to imagine twins who are identical in every way except one is living with HIV. The twin living with HIV is more likely to get cardiovascular disease than the other twin.
And these differences can be substantial. Current evidence shows that people living with HIV have a twofold increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease compared to people not living with HIV, says Professor Hans Strijdom. He is the Head of the Division of Medical Physiology and Deputy Director of the Centre for Cardio-Metabolic Research in Africa (CARMA) at Stellenbosch University. The cardiovascular risk attributable to HIV, Strijdom adds, is now believed to be equivalent to that posed by traditional risk factors such as smoking. This prompted an editorial in 2018 in one of the top cardiovascular journals, Circulation, advocating for HIV to be recognised as a major cardiovascular risk factor.
He explains that people living with HIV who are stable on treatment are living longer, making them susceptible to the normal risk posed by older age. They also have “modifiable risk factors, in other words lifestyle risk factors”, like a higher smoking and alcohol use incidence, as well as increasing rates of being overweight and obesity. Strijdom says that living with HIV, even when someone is stable on treatment, causes low-grade inflammation, which over time increases a person’s risk for cardiovascular disease. “That all in combination are the current theories [of] why we think that they have a bigger risk of cardiovascular disease,” he says.
Important study findings
Arguably, the biggest news from last year’s International AIDS Society (IAS) Conference in Australia was findings from a study on heart disease in people living with HIV. The trial, called REPRIEVE, showed that a class of cholesterol-busting drugs called statins can prevent a lot of cardiovascular disease events in people living with HIV whose cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score meets a certain threshold. Spotlight previously reported on these findings, which showed that compared to placebo, daily treatment with 4mg oral pitavastatin – a specific statin – led to a 35% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in people living with HIV classified to be at risk of cardiovascular disease.
When the findings were presented at the IAS conference, the study’s principal investigator, Dr Steven Grinspoon, said that while the researchers still have to assess more of the data collected to get a clearer picture of things, like the mechanisms driving cardiovascular disease across regions and conduct additional sub-group analyses, the study has already shown that using pitavastatin can save lives.
These sub-group analyses were discussed in greater detail at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) held in Denver in March this year. For the most part, the use of pitavastatin in the manner prescribed by REPRIEVE was considered a huge success, and the United States has since changed its guidelines to include the use of statins in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Why it is different in South Africa
However, for low-and-middle-income countries like South Africa, the case for pitavastatin might not be as clear-cut. In fact, a panel discussion at CROI was dedicated to exploring the implications of the REPRIEVE findings for such countries.
Ntsekhe, who was a speaker on the CROI panel, tells Spotlight that data from REPRIEVE’s sub-group analyses reveal there was a striking difference in event rates – which in the case of the study are MACE in those who were getting the placebo – by country income status. He explains that as predicted in high-income countries, the event rates were high, while in low-and-middle income countries – particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa – event rates were very low.
He says one of the reasons for the difference in event rates was that the screening tool used in REPRIEVE worked well to identify those people living with HIV who might benefit from pitavastatin in high-income countries like the United States, but it did not work well in Sub-Saharan Africa.
This means using pitavastatin as part of a primary prevention strategy is a much more effective intervention in high-income countries than in low-and-middle income countries like in Sub-Saharan Africa because the cardiovascular disease profile is so different.
Ntsekhe explains the term cardiovascular disease itself is broad and all-encompassing and there are many forms, including valve disease, heart muscle disease, and vascular disease. The dominant form of cardiovascular disease in the high-income countries (which he refers to as the Global North) is known as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which is characterised by a build-up of fatty deposits and plaque in the arteries.
In Sub-Saharan Africa though, Ntsekhe says “atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is but one of many forms of cardiovascular disease”, taking the fourth or fifth place in the ranking of types of major heart disease.
Research conducted in high-income countries don’t always take differences in disease burden into account, according to Ntsekhe. This means that interventions researched in high-income countries and shown to be effective in that context won’t necessarily work as well in low-and-middle income countries like South Africa.
Strijdom concurs that while results from REPRIEVE in the global context were a game-changer, the findings are not easily transferable to South Africa’s context because pitavastatin is mainly aimed at reducing “bad cholesterol” and coronary artery disease (also called atherosclerosis).
‘Taking money away’
During the panel discussion at CROI, Ntsekhe asked whether Sub-Saharan Africa could justify taking money away from other health programmes that work in order to invest in pitavastatin.
“I said basically what should be a priority for us is a) finding tools that can better identify those at risk and b) continuing to focus on what our local data suggests are the priority areas,” Ntsekhe says.
“If your entire prevention strategy is aimed at atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but it isn’t the dominant cause of disease [in your country], you’re going to be treating a whole host of people to try and tackle this thing that affects very few in a sense,” he says.
“It was not anything about REPRIEVE, it was a wonderful study, the hypothesis was tested, and it was shown to be correct, the intervention we know works,” Ntsekhe says. “It really then comes down to regional areas to think very carefully about how best they’re going to get their biggest bang for their buck,” he says. “We have to carefully consider the local context, local burden, we have set local health priorities, and weigh benefit and cost before we adopt new interventions or recommendations.”
SA’s cardiovascular disease burden
While Strijdom says we don’t have great data, he points to a large systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2018 in Circulation, which estimates that around 15% of the total cardiovascular disease burden in South Africa is attributable to HIV. “It’s probably higher than that. I would say that probably about one in five people with heart disease have heart disease because of HIV in South Africa,” he says, adding “that figure is probably only going to increase”.
Because of this, he says, there is a need for proper and clear primary healthcare guidelines specifically aimed at managing cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV, which we don’t currently have.
Strijdom says what we have at the moment since the rollout of the 2019 National ART Clinical Guidelines is very basic guidelines. This involves screening someone who has just been diagnosed with HIV by taking their blood pressure, and testing urine for glucose and proteins, and an assessment of their general cardiovascular disease risk by taking their medical and family history. These guidelines, according to Strijdom, only make provision for routine screening at baseline, but screening guidelines at follow-up visits are insufficient.
“I am, however, aware of the fact that there is progress especially from the integrated chronic disease management model which is currently being piloted in South Africa – and hopefully with that will come much more definitive and universal guidelines,” he says. “The bottom line is that South Africa, in its public health [sector] especially, really very quickly needs to come up with very clear and more comprehensive guidelines to actively manage cardiovascular disease risk in people with HIV.”
Need for annual screening
Strijdom suggest that to improve screening for cardiovascular disease risk in people living with HIV, there needs to be annual screening of people’s weight, their measure of body fat based on height and weight, waist circumference, blood pressure, cholesterol and triglyceride levels as well as testing urine samples for kidney function. There also needs to be a thorough family and medical history conducted for each patient.
“It’s not really a very expensive or very exhaustive list of stuff that you have to do. Unless of course they have specific symptoms and signs that leads you in a specific direction that you then have to perhaps do an ECG [a test used to evaluate the functioning of the heart] or cardiac imaging but that is usually determined by what you get from their history and clinical examination,” he says.
Ntsekhe says public health strategies to combat the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including cardiovascular disease, in South Africa must be strengthened. These include screening and prevention tools like checking a patient’s blood pressure and blood glucose, advising against smoking and alcohol as well as promoting health lifestyle choices like exercise and weight loss. These interventions should be offered to everyone, regardless of whether they are living with HIV or not, he says.
“The thing about NCDs and cardiovascular disease, for the most part, they are diseases of lifestyle and behaviour. So, when you talk prevention, it’s not always about drug prevention,” he says. “It’s more about intensification of those [interventions] that are already in the public domain, are very effective, and cost very little. Many of the public health and primary healthcare guidelines do advise local ministries, local health authorities on what should be happening.”
In terms of public education, Stritjdom says people need to be aware that there is something like high blood pressure. “If people are aware they will come to the clinic and will say please measure my blood pressure,” he says.
“Our health system is understandably focused on infectious diseases, but if we are not careful, we will then be totally unprepared to tackle the epidemic that will have replaced it. Namely, cancer, heart disease, stroke, obesity, diabetes, and it will totally overwhelm our public healthcare system,” he says.
Australian researchers have discovered a previously unknown rogue immune cell that can cause poor antibody responses in chronic viral infections. The finding, published in the journal, Immunity, may lead to earlier intervention and possibly prevention of some types of viral infections such as HIV or hepatitis.
One of the remaining mysteries of the human immune system is why ‘memory’ B cells often only have a weak capacity to protect us from persistent infections.
In an answer to this, researchers from the Monash University Biomedicine Discovery Institute have now discovered that chronic viral infection induces a previously unknown immune B memory cell that does not produce high levels of antibodies.
Importantly the research team, led by Professor Kim Good-Jacobson and Dr Lucy Cooper, also determined the most effective time during the immune response for therapeutics such as anti-viral and anti-cancer drugs to better boost immune memory cell development.
“What we discovered was a previously unknown cell that is produced by chronic viral infection. We also determined that early intervention with therapeutics was the most effective to stop this type of memory cell being formed, whereas late intervention could not,” Professor Good-Jacobson said.
According to Dr Cooper, chronic viral infections have been known to alter our ability to form effective long-term protective antibody responses, but how that happens is unknown.
“In the future, this research may result in new therapeutic targets, with the aim to reduce the devastating effect of chronic infectious diseases on global health, specifically those that are not currently preventable by vaccines,” she said.
“Revealing this new immune memory cell type, and what genes it expresses, allows us to determine how we can target it therapeutically and whether that will lead to better antibody responses.”
The research team are also looking to see whether this population is a feature of long COVID, which results in some people having a reduced capacity to fight off the symptoms of COVID infection long after the virus has dissipated.
A company headquartered in Johannesburg will start making flexible silicone rings to protect women from HIV. The move signals a strong vote of confidence in an African firm to supply the ring at adequate scale and affordable prices, and a crucial step to making the continent self-reliant, reports Catherine Tomlinson.
A South African company has secured the rights to manufacture a vaginal ring used to prevent HIV infection. The ring, which is inserted and removed by the user, provides protection for a month, after which it has to be replaced with a new ring. The ring contains an antiretroviral drug called dapivirine.
While studies show that the dapivirine vaginal ring is less effective at preventing HIV than HIV prevention pills and injections, it has benefits over other tools that have led the World Health Organization (WHO) to recommend its inclusion in the package of sexual health services available to women.
One advantage of the ring over HIV prevention pills is that it can be used discreetly by women, allowing users to use the ring without having to negotiate or discuss its use and purpose with their sexual partners. This is particularly important in the context of South Africa where women face high rates of gender-based violence, which erodes their autonomy over their bodies and sexual and reproductive health.
“We need to give women more control over their health and bodies and access to a range of safe and effective options, including the dapivirine ring, to choose from so they can decide to use what works best for them at different times of their lives,” wrote several prominent women African activists in 2022.
Limited access
While the WHO recommended that the ring is offered to women, its current price is a barrier to broad use and rollout in South Africa. The only dapivirine vaginal ring approved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority that is currently available in the country is called the DapiRing.
The DapiRing is manufactured by a Swedish company, Sever Pharma Solutions, under a licence from the Population Council (formerly the International Partnership for Microbicides). It can be bought in South Africa’s private sector for R320, excluding dispensing fees.
The DapiRing is not available in South Africa’s public sector outside of study and pilot sites, as the National Essential Medicines List Committee, the body that determines which health technologies should be available in the country’s public health facilities, determined that the product is unaffordable at its current price. They estimate that the product will become affordable for South Africa’s public sector at a threshold price of R52 per ring.
Local company to boost access
The Population Council, the entity that owns the intellectual property on the dapivirine vaginal ring, selected South African pharmaceutical company Kiara Health to manufacture and supply the ring across Africa.
Kiara Health’s CEO, Dr Skhumbuzo Ngozwana, told Spotlight that while it is not yet known what the price of the Kiara manufactured ring will be, it is expected to be lower than the current price of the Swedish-manufactured DapiRing.
Licensc to manufacture
The council told Spotlight that the initial focus of the licence and partnership will be to develop manufacturing capacity at Kiara Health to supply the dapivirine vaginal ring across Africa. In the long term it is hoped that Kiara will be able to serve markets outside of Africa where there is a need for the ring.
The Population Council’s selection of an African-based manufacturing partner is notable as holders of intellectual property protections on HIV health technologies have typically sought out companies in Asia, and India in particular, as manufacturing partners.
Professor Linda-Gail Bekker, CEO of the Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation, told Spotlight: “If the “COVID-19 pandemic taught us anything, it is the value of being self-reliant as a region – being able to manufacture the vaginal ring is a step closer to Southern African self-reliance.”
Ngozwana said that Kiara Health appreciates that the Population Council have bucked the trend by not going to the East. “[A]ll these new technologies tend to go to the East, but instead they’ve partnered with an African company”.
He added that future technology transfers to other manufacturers in Africa may be pursued if there is a need.
Exclusive supply licence
The Council told Spotlight that it intends to pursue an exclusive supply licence with Kiara Health for the sole supply of the dapivirine ring in Africa. The pursuit of an exclusive supply licence is a strong vote of confidence by the Population Council in the ability of Kiara Health to supply the ring at adequate scale and affordable prices.
Since Kiara Health’s exclusivity is for the supply of the ring, if there is a need, the company will be able to supply a dapivirine vaginal ring that is made by the Population Council’s Swedish manufacturing partner, Sever Pharma Solutions, that is already widely authorised for use in countries in Africa.
This would also guard against supply shortfalls that sometimes occur when only one manufacturer supplies a market, doctor Brid Devlin, the Population Council’s chief scientific officer, told Spotlight. “We would have two registered manufacturers right out the gate to guard against any shortfalls and have the opportunity to continue the supply as the demand grows.”
Why Kiara Health was chosen
Devlin added that the Population Council did not have a formal bid process through which Kiara Health was selected as the manufacturing partner for the ring, but rather that Kiara Health was selected following years of engagement with the company.
“We had a team that went to Kiara last year to see this site and it was a really impressive operation, both in terms of the staff but also the entire manufacturing operation,” she said.
Ngozwana told Spotlight that Kiara Health has existing manufacturing facilities in Johannesburg where capacity to produce the ring will be established.
Kiara Health’s manufacturing facilities already hold the quality assurance certifications (cGMP certification) required to manufacture medicines and have adequate space in Johannesburg to establish and scale manufacturing capacity for the ring, Ngozwana told Spotlight.
What is needed to manufacture the ring locally?
Critical steps include technology transfer, securing financing, procuring and importing manufacturing equipment, developing validation batches, and seeking regulatory approvals.
At this stage, there are still unknowns regarding the extent of data and testing that will be required to gain regulatory approval of Kiara Health’s dapivirine vaginal ring. To aid regulatory authorisation, Ngozwana and Devlin noted that Kiara Health would use the same manufacturing technology and inputs, including active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) used by Sever Pharma Solutions. This will require Kiara Health to import manufacturing equipment and API from Europe.
However, in the long term, Ngozwana said that Kiara Health would hope to increasingly procure manufacturing inputs, including potentially dapivirine API from the Pretoria-based API manufacturer CPT Pharma. (Spotlight previously reported on CPT Pharma’s work on API production here).
Ngozwana and Devlin told Spotlight that the anticipated time-limiting factors for establishing manufacturing capacity are securing financing and procuring and importing manufacturing equipment.
Funding has long been a challenge for African-based pharmaceutical companies since it has historically been scarce and only available on unfavourable terms. However, Ngozwana told Spotlight that Kiara Health is already engaging potential funders for support and exploring different financing sources, including grants and debt instruments.
Ngozwana and Devlin noted that technology transfer, which is a process for transferring manufacturing skills and knowledge, has already begun.
Can this license boost further domestic manufacturing capacity?
While vaginal rings are a relatively new type of health technology, they have multiple potential applications. A vaginal ring to prevent pregnancy has been available since the early 2000s and work is underway to develop a ring that is effective in combating both HIV and pregnancy. A dapivirine ring that reduces one’s risk of contracting HIV for three months – as opposed to one month – is also under development.
Kiara Health will seek to position itself to manufacture other vaginal rings entering the market, Ngozwana said. He added that in the long term, the company hoped that the partnership with the Population Council will be broadened to allow for local manufacturing of other sexual and reproductive health technologies in their product portfolio.
Some people with HIV, known as “post-treatment controllers,” have been able to discontinue their antiretroviral treatment while maintaining an undetectable viral load for several years. Starting treatment early could promote long-term control of the virus if treatment is discontinued.
Scientists from the Institut Pasteur and other institutes used an animal model to identify a window of opportunity for the introduction of treatment that promotes remission of HIV infection. The findings, published in Nature Communications, suggest that starting treatment four weeks after infection promotes long-term control of the virus following the interruption of treatment after two years of antiretroviral therapy.
These results highlight how important it is for people with HIV to be diagnosed and begin treatment as early as possible.
Research on the VISCONTI cohort, composed of 30 post-treatment controllers, has provided proof of concept of possible long-term remission for people living with HIV. These individuals received early treatment that was maintained for several years.
When they subsequently interrupted their antiretroviral treatment, they were capable of controlling viraemia for a period lasting more than 20 years in some cases. At the time (in 2013), the team leading the VISCONTI study suggested that starting treatment early could promote control of the virus, but this remained to be proven.
In this new study, the scientists used a primate model of SIV1 infection which allowed them to control all the parameters (sex, age, genetics, viral strain, etc.) that may have an impact on the development of immune responses and progression to disease.
They compared groups that had received two years of treatment, starting either shortly after infection (in the acute phase) or several months after infection (in the chronic phase), or no treatment.
The reproducible results show that starting treatment within four weeks of infection (as was the case for most of the participants in the VISCONTI study) strongly promotes viral control after discontinuation of treatment.
This protective effect is lost if treatment is started just five months later.
“We show the link between early treatment and control of infection after treatment interruption, and our study indicates that there is a window of opportunity to promote remission of HIV infection,” comments Asier Sáez-Cirión, Head of the Institut Pasteur’s Viral Reservoirs and Immune Control Unit and co-last author of the study.
The scientists also demonstrated that early treatment promotes the development of an effective immune response against the virus.
Although the antiviral CD8+ T immune cells developed in the first weeks after infection have very limited antiviral potential, the early introduction of long-term treatment promotes the development of memory CD8+ T cells, which have a stronger antiviral potential and are therefore capable of effectively controlling the viral rebound that occurs after treatment interruption.
“We observed that early treatment maintained for two years optimises the development of immune cells. They acquire an effective memory against the virus and can eliminate it naturally when viral rebound occurs after discontinuation of treatment,” explains Asier Sáez-Cirión.
These results confirm how important it is for people with HIV to be diagnosed and begin treatment as early as possible.
“Starting treatment six months after infection, a delay that our study shows results in a loss of effectiveness, is already considered as a very short time frame compared with current clinical practice, with many people with HIV starting treatment years after infection because they are diagnosed too late,” notes Roger Le Grand, Director of IDMIT (Infectious Disease Models for Innovative Therapies) and co-last author of the study.
“Early treatment has a twofold effect: individually, as early treatment prevents diversification of the virus in the body and preserves and optimises immune responses against the virus; and collectively, as it prevents the possibility of the virus spreading to other people,” adds Asier Sáez-Cirión.
Finally, these results should guide the development of novel immunotherapies targeting the immune cells involved in the remission of HIV infection.
These are the initial results of the p-VISCONTI study, which began in 2015 in collaboration with the institutions cited above and received funding from MSD Avenir and the support of ANRS Emerging Infectious Diseases as part of the RHIVIERA consortium.
1 SIV: simian immunodeficiency virus only affects non-human primates. SIV infection of animals recapitulates the key features of human HIV infection.
“The path to ending AIDS is clear,” states a recent UNAIDS report. “HIV responses succeed when they are anchored in strong political leadership, have adequate resources, follow the evidence, use inclusive and rights-based approaches, and pursue equity. Countries that are putting people first in their policies and programmes are already leading the world on the journey to ending AIDS by 2030,” it reads.
Ending AIDS and the HIV epidemic mean different things to different people.
This very ambitious language is found in Sustainable Development Goal 3.3: “By 2030, end the epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases and combat hepatitis, water-borne diseases and other communicable diseases”. The global target is to reduce the newly HIV infected population (per 1 000 uninfected population) to 0.05 by 2025 and to 0.025 by 2030.
Another version is “ending AIDS as a public health threat by 2030” which has been characterised as being “consistent with the three zeros vision: zero deaths, zero new infections and zero discrimination, operationalized as a 90% reduction of annual new HIV infections and AIDS-related deaths in 2030 compared to 2010”.
A third approach calls for countries to reach the 95-95-95 targets – 95% of people living with HIV are diagnosed, 95% of those that have been diagnosed are on antiretroviral treatment and 95% of those on treatment are virally suppressed – by 2025.
A fourth, more realistic approach, is to reduce the number of new HIV infections below the number of deaths from HIV – labelled ‘epidemic control’ – to an endemic status beyond 2030.
Regardless of the definition of ‘ending AIDS’, what should South Africa do in determining its path towards reducing the burden of HIV?
First, let’s start with what we think the HIV epidemic will look like in 2030. Whilst we do not have a crystal ball, we do have a well-recognised mathematical model – the Thembisa model, which is also used as the basis for UNAIDS’s HIV estimates for South Africa. The latest Thembisa model outputs, published last year, include projections up to 2030.
The model projects that in 2030 there will be around 128 535 new HIV infections with the bulk of these, over 54% (70 412) being young women between the ages of 15 and 24 years. Using the definition of a 90% decrease in new infections between 2010 and 2030, South Africa is projected to reach 65.7%.
The model projects that in 2030 around 8.1 million people will be living with HIV with 6.4 million being on antiretroviral treatment. The total number of AIDS deaths projected by the model in 2030 is 40 486 compared to 149 257 deaths in 2010. (This is a 72.9% reduction – not quite the 90% expected by one of the definitions noted above).
How well is the country doing in reaching the 95-95-95 targets?
According to the Thembisa model, the percentage of people ever tested for HIV stood at 83.7% in 2022 (projected to reach 86.1% in 2030). The percentage of people living with HIV who had been diagnosed was at 94.5% in 2022 and projected to reach 96.4% in 2030. The percentage of diagnosed people on treatment in 2022 stood at 77.4% and is projected to reach 81.1% in 2030.
The percentage of all people living with HIV who were virally suppressed was at 65.4% in 2022 and projected to reach 71.3% in 2030. (These percentages are slightly higher if a viral load cut-off of 1000 copies/mL rather than 400 is used). This means only one of the 95s (percent diagnosed) is expected to be reached. (If the third 95 is defined as percentage of people on HIV treatment who are virally suppressed, rather than percentage of all people living with HIV who are virally suppressed, it will also be met.)
A more optimistic picture has been reported by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) through their recently completed national survey. This survey found that 90% of 15-year-olds and older living with HIV knew their status (this included self-reported status), with 91% of them on treatment, and 94% of those on treatment being virally suppressed (at the 1000 copies/mL threshold).
Based on the Thembisa projections, South Africa is not expected to reach epidemic control by 2030. So, what needs to be done to achieve significantly fewer new infections and deaths?
What to do
In his address to the 2023 South African AIDS conference, the Minister of Health outlined what the Department of Health considered as necessary. He noted that the country has achieved 94:77:92 against the UNAIDS targets – far lower than the HSRC survey found. This means that, according to the Department’s data, there are over two million people who are living with HIV but not on treatment and a further 1.6 million people who are on treatment but are not virally suppressed. This is far higher than the 1.9 million that the HSRC survey suggests are not on treatment and not virally suppressed.
Regardless of which data is correct, it is urgent that these patients are found, initiated on treatment and supported to reach viral suppression.
While the Minister did not quantify the number of people living with HIV who are not being reached, he did outline the following interventions that he proposed should be prioritised:
Immediate implementation of the revised and consolidated ART Clinical Guidelines, which includes an integrated approach on prevention of vertical transmission, a focus on TB/HIV given high levels of coinfection, and differentiated service delivery.
A focus on the 100 identified health facilities which are lagging in reaching the 2nd and 3rd 95s (treatment coverage and viral suppression).
The need to close the testing and treatment gaps for men and children through HIV self-testing and index testing (an approach whereby the exposed contacts of an HIV-positive person are notified and offered an HIV test).
A focus on re-engaging those who have stopped taking treatment and scaling up of community treatment, 3-month dispensing of treatment medication as well as the use of community health workers in tracking and tracing people living with HIV.
A greater effort on combination prevention, using all currently available prevention methods as well as Cab-LA, which is an antiretroviral HIV prevention injection that provides two months of protection per shot.
These are well known interventions and if health workers and communities are committed to their urgent and full implementation, it is possible to achieve further reductions in new HIV infections, as well as further reductions in death. However, as most deaths in people living with HIV are due to TB, a greater focus should be placed on testing people living with HIV for TB – given the estimated 59% co-infection rates; and ensuring that they are successfully treated and initiating those that test negative for TB, on TB preventive therapy.
How do the Minister’s prescriptions align with the recently completed HIV investment case?
As recently reported in Spotlight, the only HIV intervention found to be cost saving for the health system in South Africa was condoms. However, the recent HSRC survey found that reported condom use at last sexual encounter declined in all age categories. The 2017 survey found that 68% of males aged 15-24 years reported condom use, compared to 50.6% in the latest report. Similarly, 53.4% of males aged 25-49 years reported condom use in 2017 compared to 44% in 2023.
Whilst the Minister noted in his speech at the South African AIDS conference the availability of Cab-LA for HIV prevention, the investment case found that at the current price, this was not a good investment and unaffordable! The investment case outputs suggest that it was most cost effective to increase HIV self-testing, focusing on improving linkage to treatment, as well as increasing the rate of testing infants for HIV at 10 weeks after birth. It is therefore important to prioritise HIV interventions, as noted in the investment case, given that the National Treasury has reduced the HIV conditional grant by R1 billion and that the National Strategic Plan for 2023-2028 is not fully funded!
In UNAIDS’s path to ending AIDS, the organisation suggests what countries can do to intervene. These include: political commitment to ending AIDS, respecting human rights, engaging affected communities, removing criminalising policies and laws, addressing gender inequities, stigma and discrimination, as well as a focused approach to prevention. Some of the barriers to ending AIDS are listed as: inadequate prevention programmes, large treatment gaps, and lack of sufficient funding.
In summary, to respond to the call to end AIDS by 2030:
Firstly, it is critical to agree on its definition.
Secondly, it is important to have accurate data, including at sub-national level given that national averages hide variability by province and district. District level data by sex, age and by key populations will allow a more targeted approach to reaching those that the health system typically does not reach.
While South Africa largely funds much of its HIV response – despite the reduction noted above, the possibility of reduced external funding – through PEPFAR (a US government’s effort to address HIV globally) and The Global Fund (an international financing and partnership organisation to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria) in the future, requires the country to move to a more efficient HIV response, with more precise targeting and with greater levels of accountability. For this more granular and real time data will be required.
*Dr Pillay is extraordinary professor at the Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University and director for HIV and TB delivery at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Note: Spotlight receives funding from the Gates Foundation, but is editorially independent and a member of the South African Press Council. The views expressed in this opinion piece are not necessarily shared by Spotlight.