Tag: healthcare politics

Have COVID Restrictions Eroded The Right to Dissent?

Image by Niek Verlaan from Pixabay

An article in The Guardian explores how the COVID pandemic and its restrictions have also may have caused an erosion in the institutions of democracy around the world.

On Saturday, a vigil at Clapham Common in the UK for Sarah Everard, a woman believed to have been murdered by a police officer, was broken up by police in a heavy-handed manner which drew widespread criticism.
Defending the Metropolitan police’s handling of the situation, assistant commissioner Helen Ball argued the force had to act “because of the overriding need to protect people’s safety” from COVID. In 2020, Black Lives Matter protestors were criticised for their actions in the first waves of the pandemic, but their actions did not cause a spike in infections. Indeed, the protests may have helped deter the spread of COVID due to their deterring people from going to restaurants and other forms of social gatherings.

While the Clapham Common event was not on the same scale, it is possible that even very large and boisterous protests are not ‘super-spreader’ events. And, according to the human rights organisation Liberty, they can be performed safely. For example a socially distanced rally was held in Tel Aviv in April last year against the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, where thousands of people,   each in their own space, separated by two metres, were able to shout and wave banners.

“Protest is the lifeblood of a healthy democracy, and it’s critical that we can all stand up to those in power, and make our voices heard,” said Lana Adamou, a lawyer at Liberty. “Safe, socially distanced demonstrations are perfectly possible, and it is the duty of the police to facilitate them, not block them. The current restrictions should be interpreted compatibly with our rights enshrined in the Human Rights Act.”

However a report published by Carnegie Europe in January observed that human rights are being eroded in the name of public health, with many governments using the pandemic as a pretext to crack down on dissent.

“While governments have claimed that they were imposing measures to tackle the pandemic, these measures often have been contradictory and have excessively restricted the right to peaceful assembly,” the report said, saying that while economic activities were enabled, large protests were still prohibited. In Sweden large groups were allowed to congregate in restaurants and at sporting events, but public gatherings and protests involving more than eight people were banned. It also noted that police used tactics such as kettling, a controversial tactic where police corral protestors into tight groups before arresting them, which can increase the spread of infection.

These restrictions have forced some campaigners to become creative in their protests. In the Netherlands, climate activists filled a square in front of the Dutch parliament in the Hague with 1000 shoes from all over the country. In Croatia, a civil society movement staged balcony protests against the governance of the mayor of Zagreb.

What campaigners in some countries will be asking is whether or not the pandemic has eroded the right to dissent, and to what extent will mass public protests be allowed to return once the COVID threat has passed.

Source: The Guardian

Impact of French Nuclear Testing Underestimated

A new report has found that the extent of radiation exposure to people involved in nuclear testing in French Polynesia has been significantly underestimated.

Over 1966 to 1996 at Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls in French Polynesia, France conducted An unofficial report has gone through thousands of recently declassified documents, focusing on the impact of three key nuclear tests: Aldébaran, Encelade and Centaure in 1966, 1971 and 1974.
The report suggests that the French government has underestimated fallout by as much as 40%, opening the door for tens of thousands more to claim compensation.

One millisievert (mSv) per annum is the maximum allowable public exposure. There is clear evidence for radiation effects at doses over 100mSv, while doses less than 10mSv are undetectable even in very large epidemiological studies and such low dose effects on human health are controversial. According to the linear-no dose-threshold (LNT) theory, all radiation exposure carries some level of harm.

Last February, a report was sent from Paris to French Polynesia on a cluster of cancers uncovered there, believed to be linked to radiation exposure . Email evidence suggests that at least 2000 of the 6000 military personnel involved in the tests had contracted at least one form of cancer.
It was only in 2010 that France established a compensation claims board for people with one of 23 cancers associated with radiation and who lived in French Polynesia at the time of the tests. However, many claimants do not have the means to access these claims, such as those who live on remote islands.

Faulty and imprecise monitoring equipment impacted the results, which were used to calculate the original dose calculations. The researchers recalculated the estimated doses absorbed by the population based on samples taken by the military at the time, and also using new methods involving meteorological data to plot the spread of radioactive fallout. Some recalculations did not show much change, but a 1966 test produced a level three times higher than the official estimate. Some 11 000 people exposed to the nuclear testing received a dose higher than 5mSv, the researchers found.

Source: The Guardian

Restaurants and Not Wearing Masks Increases COVID Transmission, CDC Warns

Fully opening restaurants and not having mask rules in place and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) warned.

“This report is a critical reminder that with the current levels of COVID-19 in communities and the continued spread of more transmissible virus variants, which have now been detected in 48 states, strictly following prevention measures remains essential for putting an end to this pandemic,” said CDC director Rochelle Walensky, MD, at a White House COVID briefing on Friday. “It also serves as a warning about prematurely lifting these prevention measures.”

Dr Walensky’s comments may have been made with states such as Texas and Mississippi in mind, with their governors announcing that they were dropping mask mandates and allowing full reopening, including businesses such as restaurants at full capacity. Some restaurants that are still enforcing 

Research has already shown that in-person dining and lack of mask regulations contribute to the spread of COVID cases. Taking data from state and local health department websites, COVID cases and deaths were analysed at county level The team compared data from post-implementation time points, ranging from 1-20 days to 81-100 days, to pre-implementation periods.

The researchers also attempted to control for other factors, such as restaurant closures during the mask mandates, mask mandates in the restaurant reopening models, stay-at-home orders, and bans on gatherings of more than 10 people.

Of the three-quarters of surveyed counties with mask mandates, the researchers found that within 1-20 days of mask mandates, there was a 0.5 percentage point drop in COVID case growth rates. Case and death growth rates saw almost a 2.0 percentage point decline 81-100 days after mask mandates came into effect.

Conversely, states allowed restaurants to re-open for in-person dining. While the impact was not immediate, COVID case growth rates increased 1.1 percentage points 81-100 days later. However, counties allowing in-person dining were associated with 2.2 percentage point increases at days 61-80 and a 3.0 percentage point increase at days 81-100 after restrictions were lifted.

The researchers speculated about the cause, such as restaurants potentially delaying reopening even after they were allowed to do so, and that patrons might have been more cautious during initial reopenings but more likely to dine at restaurants as time passed.

Source: MedPage Today

UK Says ‘Strong Evidence’ of Gender Health Gap Exists

Woman in a hospital bed. Photo by Andrea Piacquadio from Pexels.

As an inquiry into the disparity of health service provision to women begins this week, Ministers in the UK say there is “strong evidence” of a gender gap.

The Women’s Health Strategy will speak to women and girls over the next 12 weeks on a variety of issues, ranging from maternity care to mental health.

Nadine Dorries, minister for women’s health, said: “Women’s experiences of healthcare can vary and we want to ensure women are able to access the treatment and services they need.

“It’s crucial women’s voices are at the front and centre of this strategy so we understand their experiences and how to improve their outcomes.”

Patients have told the BBC they have felt overlooked in conditions like endometriosis, or procedures such a pelvic floor mesh.

There is less knowledge on female conditions and their treatment among clinicians. Despite the fact that they make up half of the population, female conditions are often considered a ‘niche’ area. Research shows that a large part of the problem is due to the fact that clinical trials have  failed to take into account gender. Eight out of ten drugs that were withdrawn in the US between 1997 and 2000 were as a result of side effects in women.
While campaigners have welcomed the view, they say that it is still vital to listen to women’s views and act on them.

Gill Walton, chief executive of the Royal College of Midwives, said: “We know that placing women at the centre of their own care not only improves outcomes in pregnancy, but also improves a woman’s experience of birth and maternity care.”

Mika Simmons, co-chair of the Ginsburg Women’s Health Board, filmmaker, and host of The Happy Vagina podcast, said: “Every single woman I speak to, myself included, has experienced either misunderstanding or loss as a direct result of slow or inaccurate diagnosis of their health concerns.

“I am delighted that this – the gender health gap – which grew out of a severe lack of historical research into women’s health issues, is not only finally being acknowledged but that steps are being taken to right size it.”

Source: BBC News

Bolsonaro Tells Brazilians to ‘Stop Whining’ About COVID

Amidst a surge of COVID cases and deaths in Brazil that have brought its healthcare system to the brink of collapse, President Jair Bolsonaro has told its citizens to “stop whining”, saying that the country must balance economic concerns against controlling the pandemic.

According to Brazil’s health ministry, the country has suffered 260 000 deaths from the virus, the second highest in the world after the United States.

“Stop whining. How long are you going to keep crying about it?” Mr Bolsonaro said at an event. “How much longer will you stay at home and close everything? No one can stand it anymore. We regret the deaths, again, but we need a solution.”

In order to stave off further disaster, a number of local governments have started taking matters into their own hands by imposing their own curfews and other social distancing measures. 

São Paulo’s governor, João Doria, who has been particularly critical of Mr Bolsonaro’s response to the pandemic, called President Bolsonaro “a crazy guy” for attacking “governors and mayors who want to buy vaccines and help the country to end this pandemic”.

“How can we face the problem, seeing people die every day? The health system in Brazil is on the verge of collapse,” Mr Doria said.

This comes as a Duke University scientist, another Bolsonaro critic, warned of the danger of another quarter of a million deaths, and called for an immediate lockdown to help control the situation.

The situation is exacerbated by the emergence of the P.1 variant which emerged in Manaus, and has high transmissibility and the capability to evade immunity, having a 25% to 60% chance of reinfecting an immune individual.

Source: BBC News

Scientist Issues Stark Warning on Brazil’s COVID Response

If Brazil continues to let COVID rage unchecked, it risks deadly new variants emerging to threaten the global community, a Duke University neuroscientist in Brazil told The Guardian.

Miguel Nicolelis urged the international community to put pressure on the Brazilian government, which has made little effort to manage its COVID outbreak which has so far left a quarter of a million Brazilians dead. Brazil’s COVID deaths amount to one tenth of the world’s total.

“The world must vehemently speak out over the risks Brazil is posing to the fight against the pandemic,” said Nicolelis who has spent much of the lockdown in his São Paulo flat.

“What’s the point in sorting the pandemic out in Europe or the United States, if Brazil continues to be a breeding ground for this virus?”

He said: “It’s that if you allow the virus to proliferate at the levels it is currently proliferating here, you open the door to the occurrence of new mutations and the appearance of even more lethal variants.”

Manaus, the largest city in the Brazilian Amazon, has already seen the emergence of a deadly, highly transmissible variant, P1, six cases of which have been detected in the UK already. The new variant with its “unique constellation of mutations” may also evade immunity, scientists have warned.

“Brazil is an open-air laboratory for the virus to proliferate and eventually create more lethal mutations,” Nicolelis said. “This is about the world. It’s global.”

The warning comes as hospitals around Brazil are on the verge of collapse, with a record 1726 daily deaths recorded on Tuesday.

“We’ve now gone past 250 000 deaths, and my expectation is that if nothing is done we could have lost 500 000 people here in Brazil by next March. It’s a horrifying and tragic prospect, but at this point it’s perfectly possible,” he said.

Nicoleis puts the blame squarely upon Brazil’s far right President Jair Bolsonaro. “The policies that he is failing to put into practice jeopardise the fight against the pandemic in the entire planet.”

José Gomes Temporão, who was the health minister during the 2009 swine flu pandemic, said Bolsonaro and others would have to be held accountable for their poor response.

“To this day, Brazil doesn’t have a national plan to combat COVID,” Temporão complained, criticising Bolsonaro’s failure to secure sufficient vaccines for Brazil. 

“I don’t think there is any other leader who is so obtuse, so backward, who has such a mistaken and warped vision of reality as the president of Brazil,” Temporão said. “History will condemn these people.”

Source: The Guardian

Health Experts Call for a Sugar Tax Increase to 20%

In advance of Finance Minister Tito Mboweni’s annual budget presentation on 24 February, health specialists have been calling for an increase in the health promotion levy from 11% to 20%. 

The health promotion levy (or ‘sugar tax’) was put into effect in April 2018, and imposes an 11% tax on sugar sweetened beverages. Specialists called for an increase in this tax on Tuesday at a webinar rub by the Healthy Living Alliance (Heala), saying that this was a prudent time to do it because the health sector is currently battling the COVID pandemic.

Most people hospitalised with COVID in SA have comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension, said Karen Hofman, director of the Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science (Priceless SA). Sugar, especially in liquid form, is a risk factor for obesity, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, a number of common cancers and dental decay. She added that had those comorbidities had been prevented, the country could have been in a much better position.

Hofman said that people think they have “control over what [they] are eating and drinking”, but in fact don’t, having been heavily influenced by their environment from an early age. For the tax to have any effect, it should be increased to 20%, based on the World Health Organization and other health experts’ recommendations.

Heala head, Lawrence Mbalati, said the sugar tax had created R5.4-billion for the government within its first two years. This would have been enough to finance South Africa’s downpayment for COVID vaccines from the Covax facility almost 20 times over, in spite of its minimal contribution to the overall budget. 

A doubling of the sugar tax would net an additional R2 billion to help fight COVID, Mbalati said.

“This is a watershed moment for the country,” Mbalati continued. “Government revenues are under immense pressure and funding the fight against Covid-19, including vaccines, remains critical.”

Hofman said that research in other countries with a sugar tax had shown a fall in volume of taxable beverages by 51%, and a 29% reduction in sugar intake.

“SA must address commercially driven epidemics with taxes, mandatory food labelling and mandatory comprehensive marketing bans,” Hofman said.

Source: Mail & Guardian

Embracing Ethnic Genetic Diversity in Drug Design

Although human beings have a great deal of genetic similarity, small genetic differences can nonetheless lead to very different results in drug effects.

Pharmacologist Namandje Bumpus, PhD—who recently became the first African American woman to head a Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine department, and is the only African American woman leading a pharmacology department in the country—explains why certain drugs can have different effects between distinct populations. Warfarin, for example, is known to be less effective in people of African descent.  

As new vaccines and treatments are developed to fight the COVID pandemic, which have disproportionately affected certain ethnic groups. According to APM Research Lab, in the US as of 2 Feb, Pacific Islanders are 2.7 times as likely to die from COVID as whites (adjusted for age), compared to 0.9 times for Asian Americans.

In light of these differences, Bumpus laid out a four-part plan to improve the equity of drug development.

Merely increasing the representation of races in drug trials is insufficient. Her plan includes: laboratory research to study genetic variability; diversifying the scientific workforce; diversity requirements for funding agencies; and diversity reporting requirements on clinical trial demographics in published articles.

Bumpus said that with genetic technology, animals can be engineered to “bolster predictability of drug outcomes and provide a mechanistic foundation for understanding disparities.”

Genetic variations linked to drug response are often associated with a family of enzymes, cytochromes P450. In humans this enzyme family processes about 75% of clinically available drugs. Subtle genetic differences can however lead to altered enzymes in humans, and these are more common in certain ethnic groups. 

This framework, Bumpus said, could compel the drug development field to move toward a future where “treatments are most likely to work for all people” and “existing health disparities are not further exacerbated.”

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: Namandjé N. Bumpus, “For better drugs, diversify clinical trials,” Science  05 Feb 2021: Vol. 371, Issue 6529, pp. 570-571. DOI: 10.1126/science.abe2565

EU to Restrict AstraZeneca Exports to Tackle Vaccine Shortage

In response to AstraZeneca’s COVID vaccine production and delays, the European Union has warned that it will tighten exports of the company’s vaccine to countries outside its borders.

EU Health Commissioner Stella Kyriakides warned it would “take any action required to protect its citizens”, adding that she had requested detailed delivery schedules and a meeting next week with the company. She added that “in the future, all companies producing vaccines against Covid-19 in the EU will have to provide early notification whenever they want to export vaccines to third countries”.

The vaccine, developed by Oxford University and the British-Swedish company AstraZeneca, is still yet to be approved in the EU but should receive it by the end of January, with distribution set to start on the 15th of February. The EU has been suffering from a number of vaccination programme setbacks, including a previous announcement last week from Pfizer that its own deliveries were being delayed in order to upgrade manufacturing capabilities at a plant in Belgium, provoking ire amongst EU politicians. Italy’s PM has resigned over handling of the pandemic.

The EU had signed a deal in August to secure 300 million doses from AstraZeneca, with an option for another 100 million. Last week, AstraZeneca had announced a slowdown in delivery due to “reduced yields at a manufacturing site within our European supply chain”. The problem is thought to be from a manufacturing plant also in Belgium, which is run by an AstraZeneca partner firm. The exact size of the shortfall is not known but some believe it to be a drop of 31 million doses, or 60% of those meant to be delivered by the end of the quarter.

Where this leaves low and middle-income countries counting on the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines is unclear, but it certainly will add to mounting tension between countries seeking vaccines for their populations amidst the spread of more contagious COVID variants. President Cyril Ramaphosa warned in an address to the World Economic Forum that vaccine nationalism was a growing concern and threat to global recovery. The African Union’s vaccine task team has thus far managed to secure only 270 million doses.

Source: BBC News

Like 60s Cars, Brand Drugs Have no Price Competition

Brand name drugs, like American cars in the 1960s, are subject to broadly rising prices with little evidence of competing on cost.

Before the oil embargo by Arab countries in 1973 allowed competition from more affordable, fuel efficient cars that we take for granted today, the Big Three car manufacturers, Ford, Chrysler and General Motors, would annually announce price increases at about the same time. Any adjustment by one manufacturer, for example, in size, was quickly matched by competitors.New research analysed the prices for five classes of drugs, and found them to be increasing in lock-step from 2015 to 2020. These classes are direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), P2Y12 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, dipeptidyl dipeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose transport protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors.

The study had limitations due to not taking into account measures such as rebates, which would affect the price for the patient. However, even if these were taken into consideration, the researchers believe the overall prices would still increase and have to be borne by some patients who would not benefit from certain rebates. “Rebates, list prices, and net prices have been growing for brand-name medications, and rebate growth has been shown to positively correlate with list price growth, thereby impacting costs faced by patients paying a percentage of (or the full) list price,” the researchers noted. “Therefore, the lock-step price increases of brand-name medications, without evidence of price competition, raise concerns and would be expected to adversely affect patient adherence to medications and thus clinical outcomes.”

Unlike the oil crisis which broke open the automobile market to foreign competitors, the solution with “Big Pharma” is less clear. The researchers recommend policies which would limit such lock-step price increases, reduced patent exclusivity periods, and quicker introduction of generic equivalents.

Source: MedPage Today

Journal information: Liu P, et al “Trends in Within-Class Changes in US Average Wholesale Prices for Brand-Name Medications for Common Conditions From 2015 to 2020” JAMA Netw Open 2021; DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35064.