Tag: HASA

Categories : HospitalsTags : Leave a comment

The Hospital Association of South Africa Welcomes the Day Hospital Association as a Member

On By ModernMedia
Photo by RDNE Stock project

The Day Hospital Association of South Africa (DHASA) has joined the Hospital Association of South Africa (HASA), the representative organisation of private hospital groups in the country, including Netcare, Mediclinic, Life Healthcare, Lenmed, Joint Medical Holdings, and a range of leading facilities across the country like Zuid-Afrikaans Hospital and Arwyp Medical Centre.

Among the Day Hospital Association of South Africa members are the Advanced Health chain, Cure Day Hospitals, and various leading treatment facilities situated nationwide.

According to HASA Chief Executive Officer Dr Dumisani Bomela, DHASA perspectives on healthcare reform issues, like the National Health Insurance, will contribute to a rich healthcare reform discussion. 

He says, “Through HASA, the Day Hospital Association can provide additional critical perspectives that we believe are required in the collaborative approach that we are engaging in with Government to build a strong and accessible healthcare system for all in South Africa. We completely believe that the excellent leadership of DHASA will make full use of their membership in HASA to make their important contribution.”

The Chairman of the Day Hospital Association of South Africa, Raymond Foster, says “We are excited to be associated with HASA. We are confident that HASA will meet the expectations of our members.”

Categories : Ethics and Law HospitalsTags : 1 Comment

Hospital Association of South Africa Joins Chorus of Criticism Against NHI Bill

On By ModernMedia

The Hospital Association of South Africa (HASA) has added its objections to the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI) Bill to the growing volume of objections from professional medical organisations. In common with them, HASA strongly supports universal health coverage but stands against the NHI Bill in its current form.

Their statement reads: “We believe that approving the Bill without substantive consideration of the many valid and significant recommendations and contributions made by many participants during the Parliamentary hearing is deeply regrettable and a missed opportunity by the Committee.”

Chief among their objections were the potential for corruption and mismanagement in the centralisation of medical funds as well as the many legal objections to the Fund.

Despite serious, credible concerns being raised at every turn, the NHI Bill continues to progress, with Parliamentary Portfolio Committee for Health recently giving the Bill its approval on 26 May, moving it forward to debate within the National Assembly. To support healthcare professionals, Quicknews will be running a series of articles discussing the Bill and providing resources to help them take positive action to protect healthcare services for all of their patients. The Gauteng e-toll saga has already shown that ill-conceived and damaging legislation can be brought down if there is sufficient, coordinated public opposition.

With HASA’s statement, three of the largest medical associations in South Africa have now spoken out against the controversial bill. The South African Medical Association (SAMA) and South African Private Practitioners Forum (SAPPF) have both unequivocally stated their opposition to the Bill as it is currently formulated.

In addition to other risks, South Africa faces a potential exodus of healthcare professionals. Indeed, the UK’s National Health Service has for some time been actively poaching nurses and midwives from lower-income countries like South Africa.

HASA urges National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces in their deliberations on the Bill “to insist on a multi-payer model to mitigate against the concentration of risk, an iterative rollout based on milestones rather than dates and to pay heed to the nation’s concerns that the proposed National Health Insurance Fund is susceptible to theft and corruption by proposing and approving alternate and appropriate governance structures.”

.