Tag: e-cigarettes

Categories : Addiction Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Doctors Lean on Science When it Comes to Smoking Cessation Best Practice

On By ModernMedia
Vaping with an e-cigarette
Photo by Toan Nguyen on Unsplash

Scientific evidence that supports vaping as an additional approach to tackle smoking-related morbidity and mortality is fast growing. The time is ripe for decisionmakers to embrace tobacco harm reduction and to steer away from precautionary principle-based tobacco control policies. This is according to Dr Riccardo Polosa, Founder of the Centre of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR) and Professor of Internal Medicine of the University of Catania, Italy.

Towards the end of 2022, the South African Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill was officially introduced into parliament by the Minister of Health. Now, in the coming months, it will be discussed and possibly amended by a portfolio committee.

With this Bill lumping Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS, i.e. e-cigarettes and vapes) in the same category as smoking, Kurt Yeo, co-founder of consumer advocacy group Vaping Saved My Life (VSML), explains that it is essential for those involved in this process to consider the mounting scientific evidence demonstrating that vaping is far less harmful than tobacco smoking and is an effective way to support smokers seeking less risky alternatives and/or wanting to quit.

Dr Colin Mendelsohn is an Australian academic, researcher and clinician, who has helped smokers quit for over 30 years, says that vaping nicotine is a more effective quitting aid than nicotine replacement products such as patches and gums and is the most popular aid for quitting or reducing smoking globally. “It has the potential to save the lives of hundreds of thousands of South African smokers and prevent untold disease and suffering.”

He adds that vaping has been estimated to cause no more than 5% of the harm from smoking. “While the long-term effects have not yet been established, e-cigarettes are certain to be far less harmful than smoking. Vaping carries only a small fraction of the risk of tobacco smoking and is an effective quitting aid or long-term safer substitute for smoking. Vaping should be easily accessible to help adult smokers to quit deadly cigarettes.”

Dr Polosa highlights that decisionmakers and the public should also beware of many flawed articles scientific and fake news that are propagating ‘findings’ of potential harms, thus feeding the counter-narrative that e-cigarettes are ‘not as safe as promoted’. “Proliferation of poor-quality science and fake news need to be actively contrasted by good quality science and by correct information/education.”

The proof is in the numbers

“Countries which have supported vaping such as the United Kingdom and New Zealand have had accelerated declines in smoking rates,” explains Dr Mendelsohn. “For example, in New Zealand the national adult smoking rate fell by an unprecedented 33% in the two years between 2020 and 2022 after vaping was legalised.”

Illustrating this point further, Dr Polosa says that according to the same national surveys used for reporting smoking prevalence to the World Health Organization (WHO), these countries show faster declines in smoking prevalence compared with neighbouring countries with lower uptake of these alternatives. “In Sweden and Norway, eradication of smoking is now almost a reality with a daily smoking prevalence among Norwegian and Swedish youth close to zero (1% and 3%, respectively). Widespread diffusion of e-cigarettes in New Zealand and the United States is also contributing to the historical acceleration in the downward trend in daily prevalence of smoking among young people (1.3% and 1.9%, respectively).”

Regulation is essential, but the proposed Bill is deeply flawed

When it comes to regulation, Dr Polosa asserts that vaping and smoking are completely different animals. “Smoking kills. Vaping does not.”

Therefore, to regulate vaping in the same way as smoking does not make any sense, says Dr Polosa. “Doing so denies smokers access to much lower risk products. Rather, the South African government should table a risk-proportionate approach where the main regulatory levers are applied differentially.”

“This means that the most stringent and restrictive regulation would be applied to the most harmful products: tobacco cigarettes. Regulation of the smoke-free alternatives would focus on consumer protection (i.e., benefits to the consumer) and control of uptake by adolescents in a way that does not cause significant harm to adult smokers. This would meet the demands of people who cannot or do not wish to quit completely, but with much less cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory disease as a result,” Dr Polosa explains.

Dr Mendelsohn agrees and says that the preferred regulatory model is for nicotine liquids for vaping to be sold as adult consumer products from licensed premises, with strict age verification, like cigarettes and alcohol. “Regulation of e-cigarettes should be proportionate to risk and a light touch approach is more appropriate. A balanced regulatory model is needed which allows adult smokers easy access to regulated vaping products while restricting access to underage users. The current proposals will restrict adult smokers’ access to an effective quitting aid which can save lives and prevent smoking-related illness.”

“A precautionary approach to prevent the use of much less harmful smoke-free products is unjustified in the face of the massive burden of smoked tobacco products, which are widely available. This principle requires policymakers to compare the risks of introducing a product with the risks of delaying its introduction. In the case of vaping, the relatively small risks of harm will be outweighed by the far more substantial harms from delaying access to current smokers,” Dr Mendelsohn explains.

He points out that harsh restrictions on the sale and marketing of electronic cigarettes will have negative unintended consequences and will lead to black market sales of unregulated products to both adults and children. “The public health goal should be to encourage smokers who are unable to quit to switch to vaping, a far safer alternative.”

Yeo concludes by saying: “With the Bill aiming to reduce the incidence of tobacco-related illness, disability and death, regulations should be drawn up based on all available research and case studies to ensure South Africa’s smokers are truly helped.”

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

e-Cigarette Chemicals can Cause Heart Arrhythmias

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Chiara summer on Unsplash

Researchers have found that exposure to e-cigarette aerosols can cause heart arrhythmias in animal models – both in the form of premature and skipped heart beats. The study findings, published in Nature Communications, suggest that exposure to certain chemicals in e-cigarette liquids (e-liquids) promote arrhythmias and cardiac electrical dysfunction.

“Our findings demonstrate that short-term exposure to e-cigarettes can destabilise heart rhythm through specific chemicals within e-liquids,” said Alex Carll, assistant professor in the UofL Department of Physiology who led the study. “These findings suggest that e-cigarette use involving certain flavors or solvent vehicles may disrupt the heart’s electrical conduction and provoke arrhythmias. These effects could increase the risk for atrial or ventricular fibrillation and sudden cardiac arrest.”

The researchers tested the cardiac impacts of inhaled e-cigarette aerosols solely from the main two ingredients in e-liquids (nicotine-free propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin) or from flavoured retail e-liquids containing nicotine. They found that for all e-cigarette aerosols, the animals’ heart rate slowed during puff exposures and sped up afterwards as heart rate variability declined, indicating fight-or-flight stress responses. In addition, e-cigarette puffs from a menthol-flavoured e-liquid or from propylene glycol alone caused ventricular arrhythmias and other conduction irregularities in the heart.

This work adds to a growing body of research on the potential toxicity and health impacts of e-cigarettes reported by the American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, for which UofL serves as the flagship institute.

“The findings of this study are important because they provide fresh evidence that the use of e-cigarettes could interfere with normal heart rhythms – something we did not know before,” said collaborating researcher Professor Aruni Bhatnagar. “This is highly concerning given the rapid growth of e-cigarette use, particularly among young people.”

As e-cigarette use has grown nationwide, the potential advantages and harms of vaping have been debated. Since vaping does not involve combustion, it exposes users and bystanders to little if any carbon monoxide, tar or cancer-causing nitrosamines compared with conventional cigarettes. However, e-cigarettes can deliver aldehydes, particles and nicotine at levels comparable to combustible cigarettes. Vaping might help smokers quit combustible cigarettes, but the appeal and addictiveness of e-cigarettes may encourage youth to vape amidst unknown long-term risks or take up smoking. More than 25% of high schoolers and 10% of middle schoolers in the U.S. reported using e-cigarettes before the pandemic.

“Our team’s findings that specific ingredients in e-cigarette liquids promote arrhythmias indicates there is an urgent need for more research into the cardiac effects of these components in both animals and humans,” A.Prof Carll said.

Source: University of Louisville

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

New Laws Set to Turn the Screws on Smoking in South Africa

On By ModernMedia
Cigarette butts
Source: Pawel Czerwinski on Unsplash

New legislation will soon place further curbs on tobacco smoking in South Africa – and these laws will also now extend to e-cigarettes. In South Africa, lung cancer is the third most common cancer among men and seventh for women. More than two-thirds of lung cancer patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, resulting in poorer outcomes for treatment.

Read the smoking laws notice [PDF]Download

The proposed laws impose harsher penalties against smoking in smoke-free zones, being punishable with a fine or up to three months imprisonment. More areas would be designated smoke-free zones, essentially ending the smoking sections currently set aside for restaurants and bars. This would also extend to the homes of people who employ domestic workers – the employers would not be able to smoke while those workers are present.

Smoking would also be banned in homes used for teaching, tutoring and commercial childcare. Shared residences would also have smoking banned in common areas, as would smoking in vehicles with occupants under the age of 18.

Cigarette packaging will also be targeted, with a move to plain packaging with graphic health warnings. It will no longer be legal to sell cigarettes through vending machines, nor display cigarettes at the point of sale. Sweets and toys resembling cigarettes would also be banned – however, the sugar ‘cigarettes’ that many may remember from their youth are already banned.

Vaping and e-cigarette products will also be liable to the same legislation, and are also soon to have an excise tax levied upon them.

Categories : Immune SystemTags :

Airway Immune Risks of Fourth Generation e-Cigarettes

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Nery Zarat on Unsplash

Fourth-generation e-cigarettes, such as Juul devices, are associated with unique changes in markers of immune responses inside our airways, according to a new peer-reviewed paper in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.

Third-generation e-cigarettes include vape pens and box mods. Fourth generation include nicotine-salt-containing e-cigarettes, such as Juul products, and disposable e-cigarettes, which have become increasingly popular, especially after the recent FDA ban on the sale of Juul products.

Researchers in the lab of Professor Ilona Jaspers at the UNC School of Medicine found that users of fourth-generation nicotine-salt-containing devices display a unique mix of cellular biomarkers indicative of immune suppression.

“Our work demonstrates the importance of considering device type in future clinical, epidemiological, and mechanistic studies on the health effects of e-cigarettes,” said Prof Jasper, who led the study. “We also think this research can help regulators determine which products cause the most severe types of biological changes in airway cells important for maintaining proper health.”

E-cigarettes have become popular in the last decade. Some started used them to quit smoking, believing vaping was a safer alternative, both in the short-term and long-term. Also, because electronic cigarettes don’t contain tar, consumers assumed vaping decreased their risk of cancer down the road.

“It’s impossible to know if vaping decreases cancer risk or many other long-term conditions,” Prof Jaspers said. “It took 60 years of research to show that smoking causes cancer.” In contrast, e-cigarettes have only been around for about 15 years. “Still, the research from our lab and many others has shown many of the same acute biological effects in the airways that we have documented in smokers,” she said. “And we’ve seen some changes to cells and immune defences in people who vape that, frankly, we’ve never seen before, which is very concerning.”

A major concern for researchers, doctors, and public health officials is the fact that teenagers who would not have otherwise tried cigarettes began using e-cigarettes, which contain nicotine – with its attendant health implications – and thousands of chemicals, many of which are FDA-approved for eating but not inhaling.

Several studies have documented that inhaling chemical-laden nicotine aerosols suppresses the immune responses in the respiratory tracts of smokers and e-cigarette users. Some studies, including some at UNC, have detailed how different chemicals in various e-cigarettes, including chemicals that make up thousands of different flavours, have adverse effects on airway cells. The Jaspers lab, which has been at the forefront of such research, set out to study the effects of different varieties of e-cigarette devices. For this study, her team collected central airway (sputum) samples from non-smokers, smokers, and users of both third-generation and fourth-generation e-cigarette devices.

They found that users of fourth-generation e-cigarettes had significantly more bronchial epithelial cells in their sputum, suggestive of airway injury because normally, bronchial epithelial cells make up an intact barrier in the airways and are not found in sputum samples. Levels of two proteins, sICAM1 and sVCAM1, were significantly lower in fourth-generation e-cigarette users compared to all other groups. These proteins are important in fighting infections and other disease.

In addition, proteins are important for overall immune defence were significantly lower in fourth versus third generation e-cigarette users. Lower of these proteins – CRP, IFN-g, MCP-1, uteroglobin, MMP-2, and VEGF – indications immune system depression. “Another key finding of the study was that, when examining the mixture of immune markers overall rather than one by one, fourth generation e-cigarette users had the most distinguishable changes out of all of the groups, indicating a shift away from immune homeostasis,” said the study’s lead author, Elise Hickman, PhD.

The study did not demonstrate that e-cigarettes cause cancer, emphysema, COPD, or other long-term diseases associated with long-term cigarette smoking. But researchers think that altering immune responses in the respiratory tract over the course of many years, especially for teens, could play a major role in the development of long-term health conditions and in susceptibility to inhaled pathogens.

Source: University of North Carolina

Categories : Metabolic DisordersTags :

Use of e-cigarettes Associated With Prediabetes Risk

On By ModernMedia
Vaping with an e-cigarette
Photo by Toan Nguyen on Unsplash

Analysis of a large representative database shows that e-cigarette use is associated with an increased risk of prediabetes, posing a new concern for public health.

“Our study demonstrated a clear association of prediabetes risk with the use of e-cigarettes,” explained lead researcher Shyam Biswal, PhD, at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. “With both e-cigarette use and prevalence of prediabetes dramatically on the rise in the past decade, our discovery that e-cigarettes carry a similar risk to traditional cigarettes with respect to diabetes is important for understanding and treating vulnerable individuals.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), traditional cigarette smokers are 30% to 40% more likely than non-smokers to develop type 2 diabetes, which increases their risk for cardiovascular diseases. e-cigarettes are sometimes promoted as a healthier option for cigarette smokers, and e-cigarettes use is rising among younger demographics.

The study analysed 2016–2018 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), the largest annual nationally representative health survey of US adults. Among the 600 046 respondents, 9% were current e-cigarette users who self-reported prediabetes diagnoses. The data also showed that e-cigarette users have a higher prevalence of high-risk lifestyle factors and worse self-related mental and physical health status than non-smokers.

In this representative sample of US adults, e-cigarette use was associated with greater odds of prediabetes compared to those who did not use e-cigarettes or traditional cigarettes – a worrying link from a public health standpoint.

“We were surprised by the findings associating prediabetes with e-cigarettes because they are touted as a safer alternative, which we now know is not the case,” commented Dr Biswal. “In the case of cigarette smoking, nicotine has a detrimental effect on insulin action, and it appears that e-cigarettes may also have the same effect.”

Prediabetes is fortunately a reversible condition, given appropriate lifestyle management. The authors make a compelling recommendation for targeting the reduction in e-cigarette use and education of young adults to reduce diabetes risk.

“Our effort for smoking cessation has led to a decrease in smoking traditional cigarettes. With this information, it is time for us to ramp up our public health efforts to promote the cessation of e-cigarettes,” cautioned Dr Biswal.

The researchers published their findings in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines prediabetes as a state of intermediate hyperglycaemia using impaired fasting glucose, defined as fasting plasma glucose of 6.1–6.9 mmol/L (110 to 125 mg/dL) and impaired glucose tolerance defined as 2h plasma glucose of 7.8–11.0mmol/L (140–200 mg/dL) after ingestion of 75g of oral glucose or a combination of the two based on a 2h oral glucose tolerance test. It is estimated that by 2030, more than 470 million people worldwide will be diagnosed with prediabetes.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

Investigating Vaping’s Impact on Gum Disease

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Chiara summer on Unsplash

A series of new studies investigates how e-cigarettes alter oral health and may be contributing to gum disease. The latest, published in mBio, finds that e-cigarette users have a distinctive oral microbiome that is less healthy than nonsmokers but potentially healthier than cigarette smokers, and measures worsening gum disease over time.

“To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study of oral health and e-cigarette use. We are now beginning to understand how e-cigarettes and the chemicals they contain are changing the oral microbiome and disrupting the balance of bacteria,” said co-lead researcher Prof Deepak Saxena.

While cigarette smoking is known to increase gum disease risk, much less is known about the impact of e-cigarette use on oral health, especially in the long term.

The researchers studied the oral health of 84 adults from three groups: cigarette smokers, e-cigarette users, and people who have never smoked. Gum disease was assessed through two dental exams six months apart, during which plaque samples were taken to analyse the bacteria present.

Gum health changes
All participants had some gum disease at the start of the study, with cigarette smokers having the most severe disease, followed by e-cigarette users. After six months, the researchers observed that gum disease had worsened in some participants in each group, including several e-cigarette users.

Clinical attachment loss is a key indicator of gum disease, measured by gum ligament and tissue separating from a tooth’s surface, leading the gum to recede and form pockets. These pockets are bacterial breeding grounds and can lead to worsening gum disease. In a study of the same participants published in Frontiers in Oral Health, the research team found that clinical attachment loss was significantly worse only in the e-cigarette smokers after six months.

A unique microbiome
Analysis of the bacteria in plaque samples showed that e-cigarette users had a different oral microbiome than smokers and nonsmokers, in line with their earlier results.

While all groups shared roughly a fifth of the types of bacteria, the bacterial makeup for e-cigarette users had strikingly more in common with cigarette smokers than nonsmokers. Several types of bacteria, including Selenomonas, Leptotrichia, and Saccharibacteria, were abundant in both smokers and vapers compared to nonsmokers. Several other bacteria – including Fusobacterium and Bacteroidales, linked to gum disease – were particularly dominant in the mouths of e-cigarette users.

When plaque samples were gathered and analysed in the six-month follow-up, the researchers found greater diversity in bacteria for all groups studied, yet each group maintained its own distinct microbiome.

“Vaping appears to be driving unique patterns in bacteria and influencing the growth of some bacteria in a manner akin to cigarette smoking, but with its own profile and risks to oral health,” said Fangxi Xu, study co-first author.

An altered immune response
The researchers found that the distinct microbiome in e-cigarette users was correlated with clinical measures of gum disease and changes to the host immune environment. In particular, vaping was associated with different levels of cytokines. Certain cytokines are linked to an imbalance in oral bacteria and can worsen gum disease by making people prone to inflammation and infection.

TNFα, a cytokine that causes inflammation, was significantly elevated among e-cigarette users. In contrast, cytokines IL-4 and IL-1β were lower among e-cigarette users; because IL-4 tends to be reduced in people with gum disease and increases after treatment, it suggests that certain bacteria in the mouths of e-cigarette users are worsening inflammation.

The researchers concluded that the distinct oral microbiome of e-cigarette users elicits altered immune responses, which along with clinical markers for gum disease illustrate how vaping presents its own challenge to oral health.

“E-cigarette use is a relatively new human habit,” said Scott Thomas, study co-first author. “Unlike smoking, which has been studied extensively for decades, we know little about the health consequences of e-cigarette use and are just starting to understand how the unique microbiome promoted by vaping impacts oral health and disease.”

Source: New York University

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

National Treasury Proposes e-Cigarette Tax

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Toan Nguyen on Unsplash

The National Treasury is proposing to impose a tax on both the non-nicotine and nicotine solutions in e-cigarettes (EC), and is asking for public comment by 7 February 2022.

The National Treasury published a draft discussion paper in December 2021 on the proposed taxation of e-cigarettes (ECs). The National Treasury defines e-cigarettes as battery powered devices that do not burn or use tobacco leaves but vaporise e-liquid solutions for inhalation.

In its discussion paper, the Treasury notes the uncertainty of e-cigarettes’ health risks, so it seeks stakeholder engagement on its proposal for the taxation of ECs.

The National Treasury proposes to introduce a specific excise tax on both the non-nicotine and nicotine solutions used in ECs and intends to use its existing policy guidelines applicable to other excisable products to do so. For example, traditional tobacco products are subject to excise duties at a rate of 40% of the price of the most popular brand in each tobacco category. 

For EC users, that would mean paying R2.03 per mL of EC solution nicotine-containing nicotine and R0.87 per mL of nicotine-free EC solution, if the draft proposals are accepted and become legislation. It is also proposed that EC products with a higher nicotine content will attract a higher duty rate.
Certain stakeholders may question that the Treasury’s proposed EC tax extends to nicotine-free liquids, as it does not necessarily support the government’s stated policy intention of reducing the consumption of tobacco products. The use of ECs as a means of quitting tobacco products is well established, with a Cochrane review showing that nicotine-containing ECs resulted in increased odds of quitting than nicotine-free ECs. 
It could also generate a knock-on illicit trade in e-cigarettes, as has  already happened in the tobacco sector.

Manufacturers and importers who would be taxed on ECs will need stringent certifications by accredited laboratories, which use either South African National Accreditation or International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) approved methodologies.  Where such certifications are not available, a penalty rate of duty is being proposed.

Comments on the draft discussion document are due by 7 February 2022.

Source: Webber Wentzel