Tag: dialysis

Reconsidering Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Failure in the Elderly

Chronic kidney disease (CKD). Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0

Whether dialysis is the best option for kidney failure and, if so, when to start, may deserve more careful consideration, according to a new study published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

For older adults who were not healthy enough for a kidney transplant, starting dialysis when their kidney function fell below a certain threshold, rather than waiting, afforded them roughly one more week of life, Stanford Medicine researchers and their colleagues found.

More critically, perhaps, they spent an average of two more weeks in hospitals or care facilities, in addition to the time spent undergoing dialysis.

“Is that really what a 75- or 80-year-old patient wants to be doing?” asked lead author Maria Montez Rath, PhD, a senior research engineer. Manjula Tamura, MD, a professor of nephrology, is the senior author.

“For all patients, but particularly for older adults, understanding the trade-offs is really essential,” Tamura said. “They and their physicians should carefully consider whether and when to proceed with dialysis.”

Patients with kidney failure who are healthy enough for transplantation may receive a donated kidney, which will rid their blood of toxins and excess fluid. But that option is unavailable to many older adults who have additional health conditions such as heart or lung disease or cancer.

For those patients, physicians often recommend dialysis when patients progress to kidney failure – when estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), a measure of renal function, falls below 15.

Patients and their family members sometimes assume that dialysis is their only option, or that it will prolong life significantly, Montez Rath said. “They often say yes to dialysis, without really understanding what that means.”

But patients can take medications in lieu of dialysis to manage symptoms of kidney failure such as fluid retention, itchiness and nausea, Tamura said. She added that dialysis has side effects, such as cramping and fatigue, and typically requires a three- to four-hour visit to a clinic three times a week.

“It’s a pretty intensive therapy that entails a major lifestyle change,” she said.

Lifespan and time at home

The researchers conducted the study to quantify what dialysis entails for older adults who are ineligible for a transplant: whether and how much it prolongs life, along with the relative number of days spent in an inpatient facility such as a hospital, nursing home or rehabilitation center.

The team evaluated the health records, from 2010 to 2018, of 20 440 patients (98% of them men) from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The patients were 65 and older, had chronic kidney failure, were not undergoing evaluation for transplant and had an eGFR below 12.

Simulating a randomised clinical trial with electronic health records, they divided patients into groups: those who started dialysis immediately, and those who waited at least a month. Over three years, about half of the patients in the group who waited never started dialysis.

Patients who started dialysis immediately lived on average nine days longer than those who waited, but they spent 13 more in an inpatient facility. Age made a difference: Patients 65 to 79 who started dialysis immediately on average lived 17 fewer days while spending 14 more days in an inpatient facility; patients 80 and older who started dialysis immediately on average lived 60 more days but spent 13 more days in an inpatient facility.

Patients who never underwent dialysis on average died 77 days earlier than those who started dialysis immediately, but they spent 14 more days at home.

“The study shows us that if you start dialysis right away, you might survive longer, but you’re going to be spending a lot of time on dialysis, and you’re more likely to need hospitalization,” Montez Rath said.

Tamura noted that physicians sometimes recommend dialysis because they want to offer patients hope or because the downsides of the treatment haven’t always been clear. But the study indicates physicians and patients may want to wait until the eGFR drops further, Tamura said, and should consider symptoms along with personal preferences before starting dialysis.

“Different patients will have different goals,” she said. “For some it’s a blessing to have this option of dialysis, and for others it might be a burden.”

It may be helpful, she added, if clinicians portray dialysis for frail, older adults as a palliative treatment – primarily intended to alleviate symptoms.

“Currently, dialysis is often framed to patients as a choice between life and death,” she said. “When it’s presented in this way, patients don’t have room to consider whether the treatment aligns with their goals, and they tend to overestimate the benefits and well-being they might experience. But when treatment is framed as symptom-alleviating, patients can more readily understand that there are trade-offs.”

Source: Stanford Medicine

Implanted Bioreactors Functioning as Artificial Kidneys Could One Day Replace Dialysis

Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

Scientists at UC San Francisco are working on a new approach to treating kidney failure that could one day free people from needing dialysis or a transplant and the associated immunosuppressive drugs.

The technology, described in Nature Communications, shows for the first time that kidney cells, housed in an implantable device called a bioreactor, can survive inside the body of a pig and mimic several important kidney functions. The device can work quietly in the background, like a pacemaker, and does not trigger the recipient’s immune system to go on the attack.

Eventually, scientists plan to fill the bioreactor with different kidney cells that perform vital functions like balancing the body’s fluids and releasing hormones to regulate blood pressure, then pair it with a device that filters waste from the blood.

The aim is to produce a human-scale device to improve on dialysis, which keeps people alive after their kidneys fail but is a poor substitute for having a real working organ. In the US, more than 500 000 require dialysis several times a week. Many seek kidney transplants, but there are not enough donors, and only about 20 000 people receive them each year. An implantable kidney would be a boon.

This is a key step forward is for The Kidney Project, which is jointly headed by UCSF’s Shuvo Roy, PhD (technical director) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s William H. Fissell, MD (medical director).

“We are focused on safely replicating the key functions of a kidney,” said Roy, a bioengineering professor in the UCSF School of Pharmacy. “The bioartificial kidney will make treatment for kidney disease more effective and also much more tolerable and comfortable.”

Inspired by nature, honed by science

Roy and his colleagues engineered the bioreactor to connect directly to blood vessels and veins, allowing the passage of nutrients and oxygen, much like a transplanted kidney would. Silicon membranes keep the kidney cells inside the bioreactor safe from attack by the recipient’s immune cells.

The team used a proximal tubule cell, which regulates water, as a test case. Co-author H. David Humes, MD, from the University of Michigan, had previously used these cells to help dialysis patients in the intensive care unit with life-saving results.

No immunosuppression needed

The team tracked the renal cells and the recipient animals for seven days after transplantation and both did well. The next step will be month-long trials, as required for by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), first in animals and eventually in humans.

“We needed to prove that a functional bioreactor will not require immunosuppressant drugs, and we did,” Roy said. “We had no complications and can now iterate up, reaching for the whole panel of kidney functions at the human scale.”

Source: University of California – San Francisco

Dialysis Crisis from Texas Ice Storm

Widespread power outages and water supply issues have created a dialysis crisis in Texas, following an onslaught of snow, ice, and sub-freezing temperatures.

“To say we’re stressed is an understatement. Almost all outpatient dialysis units closed due to power outages. Trying desperately to do as many as we can inpatient. To make matters worse some of our hospitals lost water today (so no HD [haemodialysis]). Truly a nightmare,” tweeted Tessa Novick, MD, a nephrologist at the University of Texas at Austin.
Half of Texas’ dialysis centres, serving 54 000 people, were unable to operate in the wake of the severe ice storm that has caused widespread damage in Texas and other parts of the US. Some patients had been without dialysis for four to five days, causing risk of potentially life-threatening potassium and fluid problems.

The large storm system, unofficially called Winter Storm Uri, dropped snow and ice over Texas on February 14 and 15, resulting in widespread power failures as lines were damaged. Few clinics have generators. Water pipes have also frozen, and this is a further problem as dialysis needs clean water to prepare concentrates and dialysate, and to reprocess the machines for following patients.

Fresenius Kidney Care said that around half of its Houston area centres have been impacted by a lack of water, “with the other centres either fully operational or operating on generators.” Water truck deliveries will allow other centres to reopen.

Tiffany Jones-Smith, CEO of the Texas Kidney Foundation, pointed out that there were some bright spots, such as eight clinics in San Antonio that brought water in and have been day and night to dialyse patients from any closed clinic regardless of affiliation. Other clinics were following suit, and Jones-Smith said patients were being given Uber and Lyft coupons to reach their dialysis centres. “We’re just kind of banding together and figuring out what needs to be done,” she said.

Looking ahead to when the crisis had cleared, Jones-Smith said, “We can’t let this go, because we need to be prepared for the next time, not just reacting to chaos, which is what we’re doing right now. … There’s no getting around we’ve had an epic failure.”

Climate change is predicted to increase the frequency and severity of such extreme events in the future, requiring better preparation.

Source: MedPage Today