Tag: diabetes

A New Bacterium Might Help Treat Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity

E. Coli bacteria. Image by CDC
E. Coli bacteria. Image by CDC

A newly discovered bacterium has been shown to have a possible link to type 2 diabetes and obesity, and may yield pathways to possible treatments.

It began when Patrice Cani, FNRS researcher at University of Louvain (UCLouvain), and his team repeatedly observed that a certain bacterium, Subdoligranulum, is usually lacking in obese and diabetic people, while it is systematically present in healthy people. Based on this, they decided to examine this family of bacteria.

Currently only one cultivated strain of this family is available in the world (the only known member of a large family) and was not the strain that was seen to be decreased in obese and diabetic people. This is not unusual: nearly 70% of bacteria in the intestine have not yet been identified — this is called the dark matter of the intestine.

In 2015, the team then set out to isolate the bacterium themselves in order to learn about its action on the human body, knowing that it is only present in healthy people. To find a second member of the family, the scientists spent two years searching, isolating and cultivating nearly 600 intestinal bacteria. 

All of this was in vain. Instead, the UCLouvain team uncovered a bacterium of a new, previously unknown kind. They named it Dysosmobacter welbionis: Dysosmo (“which smells bad”, in Greek), bacter (bacterium) is the bacterium which stinks, “Because, when you grow it, it has a slight odour,” they explained. Welbionis for WELBIO, the organisation in the Walloon region which funded this research.

The bacterium is peculiar for a number of reasons, including the fact that it produces butyrate. Though many other bacteria produce this colon cancer-promoting molecule, for example by strengthening the intestinal barrier and boost immunity. But the team also discovered that Dysosmobacter welbionis was less present in people with type 2 diabetes.

By analysing the microbiota from 12 000 faecal samples gathered from around the world, the UCLouvain scientists observed that the bacteria is present in 70% of the population. As to why such a widely prevalent bacteria was never discovered before, the answer likely lies in the improved cultivation techniques developed by the UCLouvain team.

The UCLouvain team including doctoral student Emilie Moens de Hase and post-doctoral fellow Tiphaine Le Roy then tested the action of Dysosmobacter welbionis in mice. The Results? The bacteria increased the number of mitochondria (a kind of power plants within cells that burns fat), thereby lowering sugar levels and weight, in addition to having strong anti-inflammatory effects. All these effects are very promising for type 2 diabetic and obese subjects and resemble those of Akkermansia, a beneficial bacterium that is at the heart of the research in Patrice Cani’s lab.

They also observed that the bacteria’s effects are not limited to the gut: Scientists have found that certain molecules produced by Dysosmobacter migrate around the body and have distant actions as well. This could explain the effects the bacteria have on the fat tissues, and also opens the doors for a possible impact on other diseases such as cancer. This is currently being investigated by the team.

The next step is to test the action of Dysosmobacter welbionis coupled with that of Akkermansia, in order to see if their association has cumulative effect on health, while always keeping in mind the fight against type 2 diabetes, inflammatory diseases, obesity and cancer. “That’s the fun of research: you dig for dinosaur bones and you end up finding a treasure,” Patrice Cani enthused.

Source: Université catholique de Louvain

Journal reference: Roy, T. L., et al. (2021) Dysosmobacter welbionis is a newly isolated human commensal bacterium preventing diet-induced obesity and metabolic disorders in mice. Gut. doi.org/10.1136/GUTJNL-2020-323778.

Tiny Implant Shelters Diabetes-curing Cells

Photo by Photomix Company from Pexels

A team of researchers have developed a miniscule device that allows them to implant insulin-secreting cells into diabetic mice, which secrete insulin in response to blood sugar without being destroyed by the immune system.

The findings are published in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

“We can take a person’s skin or fat cells, make them into stem cells and then grow those stem cells into insulin-secreting cells,” said co-senior investigator Jeffrey R Millman, PhD, an associate professor of medicine at Washington University. “The problem is that in people with Type 1 diabetes, the immune system attacks those insulin-secreting cells and destroys them. To deliver those cells as a therapy, we need devices to house cells that secrete insulin in response to blood sugar, while also protecting those cells from the immune response.”

Prof Millman, also an associate professor of biomedical engineering, had previously developed and honed a method to make stem cells and then grow them into insulin-secreting beta cells. Prof Millman previously used those beta cells to reverse diabetes in mice, but it was not clear how the insulin-secreting cells might safely be implanted into people with diabetes.

Prof Millman explained why the new device’s structure was so important.

“The device, which is about the width of a few strands of hair, is micro-porous—with openings too small for other cells to squeeze into—so the insulin-secreting cells consequently can’t be destroyed by immune cells, which are larger than the openings,” he said. “One of challenges in this scenario is to protect the cells inside of the implant without starving them. They still need nutrients and oxygen from the blood to stay alive. With this device, we seem to have made something in what you might call a Goldilocks zone, where the cells could feel just right inside the device and remain healthy and functional, releasing insulin in response to blood sugar levels.”

Millman’s laboratory collaborated with researchers from the laboratory of Minglin Ma, PhD, an associate professor of biomedical engineering at Cornell and the study’s other co-senior investigator. Prof Ma has been working to develop biomaterials that can help implant beta cells safely into animals and, eventually, people with Type 1 diabetes.

In recent years a number of implants have been tried to varying degrees of success. For this study, the team led by Prof Ma developed a nanofibre-integrated cell encapsulation (NICE) device. They filled those implants with insulin-secreting beta cells grown from stem cells and then implanted the devices into the abdomens of diabetic mice.

“The combined structural, mechanical and chemical properties of the device we used kept other cells in the mice from completely isolating the implant and, essentially, choking it off and making it ineffective,” Prof Ma explained. “The implants floated freely inside the animals, and when we removed them after about six months, the insulin-secreting cells inside the implants still were functioning. And importantly, it is a very robust and safe device.”

The cells in the implants continued to secrete insulin and control blood sugar in the mice for up to 200 days — even without any immunosuppressive drugs being administered.
“We’d rather not have to suppress someone’s immune system with drugs, because that would make the patient vulnerable to infections,” Prof Millman said. “The device we used in these experiments protected the implanted cells from the mice’s immune systems, and we believe similar devices could work the same way in people with insulin-dependent diabetes.”

Profs Millman and Ma stress that a considerable amount of work is needed before the device can be trialled in a clinical setting.

Source: Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis

Journal information: X. Wang et al., “A nanofibrous encapsulation device for safe delivery of insulin-producing cells to treat type 1 diabetes,” Science Translational Medicine (2021)

Spinal Stimulation Shines in Relief of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

Photo by Zoltan Tasi on Unsplash

An implantable spinal cord stimulation device was effective at relieving diabetic neuropathy pain, according to a researcher presenting at an American Association of Clinical Endocrinology virtual meeting.

Presenting the trial results, Erika A Petersen, MD, of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, said:  “This is the largest randomised controlled trial evaluating spinal cord stimulation for refractory painful diabetic neuropathy.”

In total, more than 85% of patients treated with 10 kHz stimulation were considered responders to treatment — experiencing 50% or greater reduction in pain. On top of that, 60% achieved remission, defined as a pain visual analog scale (VAS) of less than 3.0 cm for 6 consecutive months.

Meanwhile, those receiving only normal medical management saw no significant pain score reduction (7.0 at baseline vs 6.9 at 6 months). More than half of those conventionally treated experienced worsening of their pain, and only about 5% were responders to this type of treatment. Overall, only 1% of patients achieved pain remission with conventional medical management.

Beyond pain improvement, those receiving high frequency spinal cord stimulation plus medical management also saw a 62% improvement in neurological examination versus 3.3% of conventional treatment-only patients (P<0.001). The neurological examination included such as lower limb motor strength, light touch sensation and a 10-point foot assessment with a pinprick and 10-g monofilament.

Patients with the stimulation device also reported a reduction in dysesthaesias or uncomfortable sensations such as itching. They also reported a 62% improvement in sleep disturbances.

Overall, 92% patients in the stimulation group said they were satisfied with their treatment, compared with 6% of those on the conventional treatment group said the same.

The trial included 216 adults with painful analgesic-resistant diabetic neuropathy of the lower limbs. Half of participants received only conventional medical management, which included pharmacotherapies.

The other half of participants received 10-kHz SCS therapy. These participants received temporary stimulation for 5 to 7 days with percutaneous leads placed epidurally along T8 to T11. If 50% pain relief was achieved, they could have a permanent implantation of the pulse generator, usually in the low back.

In terms of safety, three infections occurred in the stimulation group, two of which required device removal.

There was no change in BMI or HbA1c in either group during the trial.

After the 6-month trial, 82% of patients on conventional treatment were eligible to crossover — meaning they had less than 50% pain relief, were dissatisfied with treatment, and the investigator agreed it was medically appropriate — and chose to receive the stimulation device.

In this extension phase, those with the stimulation device continued to experience pain relief, achieving an average VAS of 1.7 at 12 months out.

“The responder rate remained stable as well, with 86% at 12 months suggesting the attrition seen with other stimulation approaches is not a concern with 10 kHz stimulation,” said Petersen. “We will continue our follow-up to 24 months, with further evaluation of health economic data and other indicators.”

Source: MedPage Today

Journal information: Petersen E, et al “Neuromodulation for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy – sustained benefits of 10kHz spinal cord stimulation in a randomized controlled trial” AACE 2021.

Only 1 in 10 Getting Full Diabetes Care in Developing Countries

 Only 1 in 10 people with diabetes in low- and middle-income countries are getting evidence-based, low-cost comprehensive care proven to reduce diabetes-related problems, according to a study published in Lancet Healthy Longevity

That comprehensive package of care – low-cost medicines to reduce blood sugar, blood pressure and cholesterol levels; and counseling on diet, exercise and weight – can help lower the health risks of under-treated diabetes. Those risks include future heart attacks, strokes, nerve damage, blindness, amputations and other disabling or fatal conditions.

The authors analysed data from recent surveys, examinations and tests of over 680 000 people between 25 and 64 worldwide. More than 37 000 had diabetes; more than half of them had a key biomarker of elevated blood sugar but had not yet received a diagnosis.

The researchers have provided their findings to the World Health Organization, which is developing efforts to scale up delivery of evidence-based diabetes care globally as part of an initiative known as the Global Diabetes Compact. The forms of diabetes-related care used in the study are all included in the 2020 WHO Package of Essential Noncommunicable Disease Interventions.

“Diabetes continues to explode everywhere, in every country, and 80% of people with it live in these low- and middle-income countries,” said lead author David Flood, MD, MSc, a National Clinician Scholar at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation. “It confers a high risk of complications such as including heart attacks, blindness, and strokes. We can prevent these complications with comprehensive diabetes treatment, and we need to make sure people around the world can access treatment.”

Flood worked with senior author Jennifer Manne-Goehler, MD, ScD, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Medical Practice Evaluation Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, to lead the analysis of detailed global data.

In addition to the main finding that 90% of the people with diabetes studied weren’t getting access to all six components of effective diabetes care, the study also finds major gaps in specific care.

For instance, while about half of all people with diabetes were taking a drug to lower their blood sugar, and 41% were taking a drug to lower their blood pressure, only 6.3% were receiving cholesterol-lowering medications. Less than a third had access to counseling on diet and exercise.

These findings show the need to scale-up proven treatment not only to lower glucose but also to address cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as hypertension and high cholesterol, in people with diabetes.

“Diabetes continues to explode everywhere, in every country, and 80% of people with it live in these low- and middle-income countries. We need to make sure people around the world can access treatment.” David Flood, MD, MSc.

Even when the authors focused on the people who had already received a formal diagnosis of diabetes, they found that 85% were taking a medicine to lower blood sugar, 57% for blood pressure, but only 9% for cholesterol. Nearly 74% had received diet-related counseling, and just under 66% had received exercise and weight counseling.

Taken together, less than one in five people with previously diagnosed diabetes were getting the full package of evidence-based care.

Economy and availability of care

The researchers found that generally, the lower the average income of the country and region,  the less evidence-based diabetes care was available.

The nations in the Oceania region of the Pacific had the highest prevalence of diabetes – both diagnosed and undiagnosed – but the lowest rates of diabetes-related care.

However some low-income countries had higher-than-expected rates of good diabetes care, said Dr Flood. The Latin America and Caribbean region had the second highest diabetes prevalence, but had much higher levels of care than Oceania.

Finding out what the countries with high-performing achievements in diabetes care are doing well could provide valuable insights for improving care elsewhere, the authors said. That even extends to informing care in high-income countries like the United States, which does not consistently deliver evidence-based care to people with diabetes.

The study also highlights differences in diabetes diagnoses in different regions and countries. Access to diagnosis enables people to receive diabetes care.

Women, people with higher levels of education and higher personal wealth, and people who are older or had high body mass index were more likely to be receiving evidence-based diabetes care. Diabetes in people with ‘normal’ BMI is not uncommon in low- and middle-income countries, suggesting more need to focus on these individuals, the authors noted.

The fact that cheap diabetes-related medications are available, and that people can cut risk through lifestyle changes, mean that cost should not be a major barrier, said Flood. In fact, studies have shown that the medications are cost-effective as a preventative measure.

Source: University of Michigan

Journal information: David Flood et al, The state of diabetes treatment coverage in 55 low-income and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative, individual-level data in 680 102 adults, The Lancet Healthy Longevity (2021). DOI: 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00089-1

Milk Consumption Does Not Raise Cholesterol Levels

Photo by ROBIN WORRALL on Unsplash

Regular consumption of milk is not associated with increased levels of cholesterol, according to new research.

A study published in the International Journal of Obesity analysed three large population studies and found that people who regularly drank high amounts of milk had lower levels of both ‘good’ and ‘bad’ cholesterol, although their BMI levels were higher than non-milk drinkers. Analysis of other large studies also suggests that regular milk drinkers had a 14% lower risk of coronary heart disease.

The team of researchers took a genetic approach to milk consumption by looking at a variation in the lactase gene associated with digestion of lactose. The study found that this gene variation for digesting lactose was a good identifier for people who consumed higher levels of milk.

“We found that among participants with a genetic variation that we associated with higher milk intake, they had higher BMI, body fat, but importantly had lower levels of good and bad cholesterol,” said Vimal Karani, Professor of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics at the University of Reading said. “We also found that those with the genetic variation had a significantly lower risk of coronary heart disease. All of this suggests that reducing the intake of milk might not be necessary for preventing cardiovascular diseases.”

Contradictory research on the effect of high dairy intake and obesity and metabolic disorders was the motivation for the study. To exclude the effects of differences in sampling size, ethnicity and other factors, the team conducted a meta-analysis of data in up to 1.9 million people, including the UK Biobank and used the genetic approach to avoid confounding.

Even though the UK Biobank data showed that those with the lactase gene had an 11% reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, the study did not find a link between higher milk intake and increased likelihood of diabetes or related traits, such as glucose and inflammatory biomarkers.

“The study certainly shows that milk consumption is not a significant issue for cardiovascular disease risk even though there was a small rise in BMI and body fat among milk drinkers. What we do note in the study is that it remains unclear whether it is the fat content in dairy products that is contributing to the lower cholesterol levels or it is due to an unknown ‘milk factor’,” said Professor Karani.

Source: EurekaAlert

Journal information: Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran et al, Evidence for a causal association between milk intake and cardiometabolic disease outcomes using a two-sample Mendelian Randomization analysis in up to 1,904,220 individuals, International Journal of Obesity (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41366-021-00841-2

New Clinical Practice Review for Diabetes Drugs

A new clinical practice review article in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) collates the latest trial results and guidelines into a systematic approach for the treatment of patients with diabetes and a risk of cardiovascular disease. It is the journal’s first such review by the journal in nearly a decade.

Clinical practice reviews differ from research studies in that they present a common clinical problem along with the evidence supporting various treatment strategies and review the guidelines. Finally, the author offers clinical recommendations for optimising patient care.

Compared to those without the disease, people with type 2 diabetes have over double the risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure. In South Africa, 10.1% of the population over 15 is believed to have type 2 diabetes, and is expected to cost the health sector R35.1 billion by 2030. 

The NEJM article by Johns Hopkins Medicine endocrinologist and associate professor Rita Rastogi Kalyani, MD, presents an up-to-date approach for health care providers when choosing among glucose-lowering therapies for their patients with diabetes, particularly to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Dr Kalyani reviews the cardiovascular benefits and risks of the most common diabetes drugs currently available on the US market.

“We’ve seen a major shift in diabetes care over the past few years,” said Dr Kalyani. “We now have tools to better understand how to reduce both microvascular and macrovascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes.”

Dr Kalyani highlighted specific agents in two newer drug classes, which she showed are beneficial for patients with diabetes who already show signs of heart or blood vessel disease.

The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists liraglutide, injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide increase insulin production from the body, particularly after meals.

Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors empagliflozin and canagliflozin reduce the amount of glucose the body re-absorbs through urine. 

All of these are effective in risk reduction for major cardiovascular events, such as heart attack or stroke. The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin is effective in reducing the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure.

“After metformin, which is widely considered the initial drug treatment for type 2 diabetes, specific drugs in the GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor classes with demonstrated cardiovascular benefit should be considered as additional medications for patients who already have cardiovascular disease. This should be done irrespective of whether their A1C level is at target to reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events,” advised Kalyani.

The A1C test measures the average percentage of glucose in a person’s haemoglobin over the span of several months. Healthy A1C levels are below 5.7%, and typically, A1C levels over 6.5% indicate diabetes.

Newer drugs tend to be costlier, and long-term effects are unknown. Also, prior to 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration did not require large outcome trials for drugs after they were released onto the market, meaning that older drugs have less certain cardiovascular outcomes, said Dr Kalyani.
The NEJM article details specific drugs that offer additional benefits for patients with diabetes who have conditions such as multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

“Some agents such as dulaglutide and dapagliflozin also have demonstrated cardiovascular benefit in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors,” said Dr Kalyani.

Further, specific SGLT2 inhibitors can be beneficial for patients who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, as well for patients with chronic kidney disease.

Comprehensive drug tables in the article take into account factors for consideration in clinical practice when choosing a glucose-lowering drug for patients with type 2 diabetes, including A1C-lowering efficacy, route and frequency of administration, cost, impacts weight, hypoglycaemia risk, side effects and clinical benefits.

“Health care providers in primary care, endocrinology, cardiology and nephrology are now prescribing these newer glucose-lowering drugs for their patients,” Dr Kalyani said. “Diabetes care will need to be increasingly collaborative in the future and, at its core, remain patient-centered.”

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: Rita R. Kalyani et al. Glucose-Lowering Drugs to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes, New England Journal of Medicine (2021). DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp2000280

Why Antipsychotic Drugs Cause Weight Gain

A University of Pittsburgh study has discovered that the reason antipsychotic medications have weight gain as side effects is because the pancreas also produces and responds to dopamine.

Dopamine is a neurotransmitter involved in mood regulation, pleasure and reward signalling. Many psychological disorders are thought to involve dopamine imbalances and are treated by medications designed to this end.
“There are dopamine theories of schizophrenia, drug addiction, depression and neurodegenerative disorders, and we are presenting a dopamine theory of metabolism,” said lead author Despoina Aslanoglou, PhD, at the University of Pittsburgh. “We’re seeing now that it is not only interesting to study dopamine in the brain, but it is equally interesting and important to study it in the periphery.”

Senior author Zachary Freyberg, MD, PhD, assistant professor of psychiatry and cell biology at Pitt, observed that the dopamine theory is not as simple or as well understood as we would like to think.

“We still don’t really understand how dopamine signals biologically,” said Dr Freyberg. “Even decades after dopamine receptors have been discovered and cloned, we still deploy this ‘magical thinking’ approach: something happens that’s good enough. We use drugs that work on dopamine receptors, but how they intersect with this ‘magical system’ is even less understood.”

The researchers found that dopamine is not only produced in the brain but also in the alpha and beta cells of the pancreas, which secrete glucagon and insulin, respectively.

Alpha cells can produce their own dopamine with no precursors in response to glucose levels, while beta cells require an L-DOPA precursor. It may be possible that alpha cells secrete dopamine for their own receptors, while also supplying it to beta cells to suppress the release of insulin.

Surprisingly, the researchers also discovered that pancreatic dopamine can affect other receptors, such as noradrenaline and adrenaline.
At low concentrations, dopamine binds to D2-like dopamine receptors, blocking the release of glucagon or insulin. At high concentrations, dopamine binds to beta-adrenergic receptors, becoming stimulatory and pushing up glucagon levels while inhibiting insulin levels by blocking alpha-adrenergic receptors.

The study revealed how blocking inhibitory dopamine receptors causes an unchecked release of insulin and glucagon, leading to metabolic disorders and eventually, obesity and diabetes. This finding will help to formulate better drugs that target the dopamine system, reducing the effect on the pancreas.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Treating Periodontitis can Reduce Risks of Certain Other Diseases

A steadily growing body of evidence points to a two-way connection between oral health and systemic disease.

Periodontitis, the inflammation and disease of tissues surrounding the teeth, is already known to be a result of type 2 diabetes, but there is research to suggest that it may also cause diabetes—as well as certain other diseases.

“What happens in your body impacts your mouth, and that in turn impacts your body. It’s truly a cycle of life,” said Professor Purnima Kumar of The Ohio State University. “What is more dynamic than the gateway to your body – the mouth?” she continued. “It’s so ignored when you think about it, and it’s the most forward-facing part of your body that interfaces with the environment, and it’s connected to this entire tubing system. And yet we study everything but the mouth.”

The link between oral health and type 2 diabetes was first established in the 1990s, and Prof Kumar has led many investigations into this area. She was lead author in a study published last year that investigated the oral microbiomes of people with and without type 2 diabetes, and the effects of nonsurgical periodontitis treatment.

“Our studies have led up to the conclusion that people with diabetes have a different microbiome from people who are not diabetic,” Prof Kumar said. “We know that changing the bacteria in your mouth and restoring them back to what your body knows as healthy and friendly bacteria actually improves your glycemic control.”

The rough picture that has emerged is that oral bacteria are aerobic, but even small changes such as a few days of not brushing teeth can trigger a cascade that results in the bacteria shifting to an anaerobic, fermentative state producing toxins and byproducts. It becomes, as Prof Kumar puts it, “a septic tank” that stimulates the immune system and causes an inflammatory state, producing signalling products that bacteria then feed on.

“Then this community – it’s an ecosystem – shifts. Organisms that can break down protein start growing more, and organisms that can breathe in an oxygen-starved environment grow. The bacterial profile and, more importantly, the function of the immune system changes,” she explained.

The inflammation causes pores to open in the lining of the mouth, allowing the bacteria entry to the body.

“The body is producing inflammation in response to these bacteria, and those inflammatory products are also moving to the bloodstream, so now you’re getting hammered twice. Your body is trying to protect you and turning against itself,” Prof Kumar said. “And these pathogens are having a field day, crossing boundaries they were never supposed to cross.”

Though the relationship between oral health and certain disease is a complex one, Prof Kumar said prevention was exceedingly simple. Daily brushing and flossing with twice-yearly dentist visits for cleaning were sufficient.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Kumar, P. S., et al. (2020) Subgingival Host-Microbial Interactions in Hyperglycemic Individuals. Journal of Dental Research. doi.org/10.1177/0022034520906842. 

Large Study Casts Doubt on “Fat but Fit”

New Spanish research casts doubt on the “fat but fit” paradox, where it is thought that physical fitness is enough to eliminate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

Overweight and obesity is a worldwide problem that is greatly contributing to the burden of noncommunicable diseases, including CVD. A high body mass index (BMI) is strongly associated with CVD risk factors, such as hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension and diabetes. The cardiovascular complications arising from overweight and obesity are driven by processes such as inflammation, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, coronary calcification. Some evidence suggested that physical activity was cardioprotective, partly or completely eliminating the CVD risk from disease – the “fat but fit” paradox.

A recent meta-analysis showed that cardiovascular fitness was a better predictor of cardiovascular disease over overweight/obesity, suggesting that perhaps public health programmes should emphasise fitness over control of body weight. To this end, the researchers sought to confirm if the “fat but fit” paradox was real.

The researchers gathered data from workers’ health insurance, with participants aged 18-64 grouped into normal weight, overweight and obesity by BMI, and into regularly active ( >150 min moderate physical activity or equivalent per week), insufficiently active (less than regularly active) and inactive (no physical activity at all). They were further separated by age, sex, smoking status and residential address.

Approximately 42%, 41%, and 18% of participants had normal weight, overweight, or obesity, respectively; 63.5%, 12.3%, and 24.2% were inactive, insufficiently active, and regularly active; and 30%, 15%, and 3% had hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, and diabetes.

However, the protective effect of physical activity was far less than the excess risk from overweight/obesity. So much so that even regularly active obese participants had two to five-fold risk increases over their inactive but normal weight peers in the risk factors.

The protective effect of physical activity in overweight/obesity remains controversial. Shortcomings of the study were that they did not control for diet, and only accounted for self-reported leisure time activities. However, the large study size, with over 500 000 participants, should put paid to the theory that a physically active lifestyle can completely eliminate the deleterious effects of overweight/obesity.

The researchers concluded that, “weight loss per se should remain a primary target for health policies aimed at reducing CVD risk in people with overweight/obesity.”

Journal article source: European Journal of Protective Cardiology

Journal information: Pedro L Valenzuela, et al., Joint association of physical activity and body mass index with cardiovascular risk: a nationwide population-based cross-sectional study, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2021;, zwaa151, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa151

Brown Fat May Protect Against Multiple Chronic Diseases

Brown fat, which is found around the neck and shoulders, was once thought only to be beneficial to newborns, but has more recently been thought to have beneficial health effects in humans. However, it has been challenging to study since it is so deeply buried.

In mouse models, brown fat is known to be thermogenic, significantly improving glucose and lipid homeostasis, but in humans its role in metabolism and cardiovascular disease was still unclear. The prevalence of brown fat is difficult to measure in humans, since the only noninvasive way to detect it is with expensive PET scans. However, radiologists have to distinguish brown fat from tumours in PET scans, and this provided a valuable resource to establish the prevalence of brown fat in the population. The researchers used 134 529 PET scans of 52 487 patients.

Brown fat was found in some 10% of the population, which may be an underestimate since individuals undergoing the scans were told to avoid cold, exercise and caffeine, which are all known to increase the activity of brown fat.

“For the first time, it reveals a link to lower risk of certain conditions,” said Paul Cohen, Assistant Professor at The Rockefeller University Hospital. “These findings make us more confident about the potential of targeting brown fat for therapeutic benefit.”

Despite this new evidence, exactly how brown fat contributes to health is still unclear, although there are some clues. Brown fat uses glucose to generate energy, and this may help lower blood glucose levels. The role hat brown fat plays in hypertension, which is tightly connected to the hormonal system, is less clear.”We are considering the possibility that brown fat tissue does more than consume glucose and burn calories, and perhaps actually participates in hormonal signaling to other organs,” Cohen says.

The researchers plan to investigate the biology of brown fat, such as by looking for genetic variations to explain why some have it and others do not, which may lead to pharmacological treatments.

“The natural question that everybody has is, ‘What can I do to get more brown fat?'” Cohen said. “We don’t have a good answer to that yet, but it will be an exciting space for scientists to explore in the upcoming years.”

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: Becher, T., Palanisamy, S., Kramer, D.J. et al. Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health. Nat Med (2021). doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1126-7