Tag: covid vaccination

Categories : COVID Ethics and LawTags :

“Anti-vax” Doctor’s Disciplinary Inquiry gets Underway

On By ModernMedia

Shankara Chetty is accused of failing to act in the best interests of patients

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

By Tania Broughton for GroundUp

The disciplinary hearing against “anti-vax” doctor Shankara Chetty got underway in Durban this week, after changes to the charge sheet were made.

This comes after Chetty asked that the charges be dismissed or revised – or he would approach the high court for relief.

The charges are based on allegations by Francois Venter, a medical professor at Wits University who was at the forefront of Covid research in South Africa. He said Chetty was practicing “pseudo-science” at the height of the pandemic, with Chetty claiming that vaccines made no sense.

Chetty’s argument, in the main, focusses on his right to freedom of expression and claims that expressing a view is not a violation of the ethical guidelines of the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA).

His lawyers argued that the charges should have been dropped. Instead, the disciplinary committee ordered that they be amended.

The revised charge sheet contains four charges of unprofessional conduct.

They include that he contravened norms and standards by using unproven and unrecommended health technologies, namely Chetty’s “8th day” protocol, and that he failed to act in the best interests of patients by prescribing ivermectin, corticosteroids, and hydroxychloroquine for Covid, which were not approved by the South African Health Products Regulatory Council for this purpose.

He is also charged with casting aspersions on expert health care professionals who were authorised to provide advice and develop protocols, by stating that they engineered protocols in hospitals to “cause death and damage” to Covid patients.

The final, and fourth charge, is based on allegations that he “mischaracterised the cause and identification of the Covid illness, spike proteins and the toxicity of the virus”, which was not in line with the tenets of science.

In his complaint to the HPCSA, Venter said Chetty had made unprecedented claims in a video regarding the toxicity of Covid vaccines and that they were a “deliberate mass poisoning and planned to kill billions”.

He said Chetty, on his own website, had also made “outlandish physiological claims” which undermined the most basic tenets of accepted science about the vaccines, and advocated outpatient remedies of his own.

He said the video and the website “were more than enough evidence of gross misrepresentation of the vaccine programme: anybody watching would be justified in being severely alarmed at the prospect of mass poisoning”.

Chetty’s narrative, Venter said, went against the Department of Health, local experts, and international guidelines.

“This level of pseudo-science within the profession needs to be firmly and quickly clamped down on. The HPCSA must do its duty in protecting the public and discipline Chetty.”

In his written response, Chetty said the video was taken at a three-day Caribbean Summit held by the Word Council for Health, which brought together experts in various fields to share opinions and insights on the pandemic. (Wikipedia describes the World Council for Health as a pseudo-medical organisation dedicated to spreading misinformation to discourage COVID-19 vaccination and promoting fake COVID-19 treatments.)

The summit was not open to the general public and was a behind-closed-doors robust discussion.

Chetty said he did not consent to any recording being shared with the public.

He said he was not an “anti-vaxxer” but he was of the view that the vaccine technology had been rushed to market, with poor safety surveillance by clinical trials, and with a disregard for informed consent and individual choice.

In a written response, Venter said Chetty’s right to freedom of speech did not absolve him of his ethical duties.

This included not posting opinions on the professional reputations of their colleagues on social media “lest the public lose faith in the healthcare profession”.

Chetty is expected to plead not guilty to all the charges. According to the minutes of a pre-inquiry conference, both the HPCSA and Chetty intend to call expert witnesses.

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Source: GroundUp

Categories : COVID Ethics and LawTags :

Pretoria High Court Judgement On COVID-19 Vaccinations

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Bill Oxford on Unsplash

On 05 January 2023, the COVID Care Alliance NPC and other applicants brought an urgent court application against the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), including the President of the Republic of South Africa and others to prevent people from being vaccinated.

The applicants wanted the court to order that all COVID-19 vaccines programs must be stopped and that all COVID-19 vaccination sections in healthcare facilities in South Africa must be closed, and the effective withdrawal from circulation of the vaccines. The applicants also sought an order interdicting the approval of vaccines for emergency authorisation or registration.

On 27 February 2024, the Pretoria High Court dismissed with costs an application filed by the applicants on the grounds that the applicants do not have the right to prevent others, who do not share in their beliefs or opinions, from being vaccinated.

SAHPRA submitted evidence to the Court to show that the applicants’ attempt to prevent government from using vaccines to address the COVID-19 pandemic was misguided, and the applicants heavily relied on hearsay and speculation, as well as supported their arguments with the opinion of persons who were not experts.

Source: SAHPRA

Categories : COVID VaccinesTags :

Hypervaccination: Researchers Investigate a Man who Received 217 COVID Shots

On By ModernMedia

Researchers in Germany find no negative effects on immune system

Photo by Gustavo Fring

Researchers at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen have examined a man who has received more than 200 vaccinations against COVID. They learned of his case via newspaper reports.

Until now, it has been unclear what effects hypervaccination such as this would have on the immune system. Some scientists were of the opinion that immune cells would become less effective after becoming used to the antigens. This proved not to be the case in the individual in question: his immune system is fully functional. Certain immune cells and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are even present in considerably higher concentrations than is the case with people who have only received three vaccinations. The results have been published in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases.

More than 60 million people in Germany have been vaccinated against SARS-Coronavirus 2, the majority of them several times. The man who has now been examined by researchers at FAU claims to have received 217 vaccinations for private reasons. There is official confirmation for 134 of these vaccinations.

“We learned about his case via newspaper articles,” explains Privatdozent Dr Kilian Schober from the Institute of Microbiology – Clinical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene (director Prof Dr Christian Bogdan). “We then contacted him and invited him to undergo various tests in Erlangen. He was very interested in doing so.” Schober and his colleagues wanted to know what consequences hypervaccination such as this would have. How does it alter the immune response?

As a rule, vaccinations contain parts of the pathogen or a type of construction plan that the vaccinated person’s cells can use to produce these pathogenic components themselves. Thanks to these antigens, the immune system learns to recognize the real pathogen in the event of a later infection. It can then react more rapidly and forcibly. But what happens if the body’s immune system is exposed extremely often to a specific antigen?

“That may be the case in a chronic infection such as HIV or Hepatitis B, that has regular flare-ups,” explains Schober. “There is an indication that certain types of immune cells, known as T-cells, then become fatigued, leading to them releasing fewer pro-inflammatory messenger substances.” This and other effects triggered by the cells becoming used to the antigens can weaken the immune system. The immune system is then no longer able to combat the pathogen so effectively.

Blood samples from several years investigated

The current study, which also involved researchers from Munich and Vienna, does not deliver any indication that this is the case, however. “The individual has undergone various blood tests over recent years;” explains Schober. “He gave us his permission to assess the results of these analyses. In some cases, samples had been frozen, and we were able to investigate these ourselves. We were also able to take blood samples ourselves when the man received a further vaccination during the study at his own insistence. We were able to use these samples to determine exactly how the immune system reacts to the vaccination.”

The results showed that the individual has large numbers of T-effector cells against SARS-CoV-2. These act as the body’s own soldiers that fight against the virus. The test person even had more of these compared to the control group of people who have received three vaccinations. The researchers did not perceive any fatigue in these effector cells, they were similarly effective as those in the control group who had received the normal number of vaccinations.

Memory T cells are another aspect the researchers explored. These are cells at a preliminary stage, before effector cells. Similar to stem cells, these cells can replenish numbers of suitable effector cells. “The number of memory cells was just as high in our test case as in the control group,” explains Katharina Kocher, one of the leading authors of the study. “Over all, we did not find any indication for a weaker immune response, rather the contrary.”  In addition, even the 217th vaccination that the man received during the study still had an effect: the number of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 increased significantly as a result.

Immune system remains active against other pathogens

Further tests indicated that there was no change to the immune system’s effectiveness against other pathogens. It therefore appears to be the case that the hypervaccination has not damaged the immune system as such. “Our test case was vaccinated with a total of eight different vaccines, including different available mRNA vaccines,” stated Dr Kilian Schober. “The observation that no noticeable side effects were triggered in spite of this extraordinary hypervaccination indicates that the drugs have a good degree of tolerability.”

However, this is one individual case. The results are not sufficient for making far-reaching conclusions let alone recommendations for the general public. “Current research indicates that a three dose vaccination, coupled with regular top-up vaccines for vulnerable groups, remains the favoured approach. There is no indication that more vaccines are required.”

Source: Friedrich–Alexander University Erlangen–Nurnberg

Categories : COVID VaccinesTags :

COVID Vaccination and Antibody Responses Found to be Long-lasting

On By ModernMedia
Image by Fusion Medical on Unsplash

A long-term analysis conducted by leading microbiologists at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai reveals that antibody responses induced by COVID vaccines are long-lasting. The study results, published online in the journal Immunity, challenge the idea that mRNA-based vaccine immunity wanes quickly.

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2019 sparked the global pandemic that is now in its fifth year. Vaccines that were developed at record speed have saved millions of lives. However, the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and waning immunity have decreased the effectiveness of the vaccines against symptomatic disease. The common perception now is that mRNA-based vaccine-induced immunity wanes quickly. However, this assumption is largely based on data from short-term studies that include a very limited number of data points following peak responses.

The Mount Sinai research team’s analysis of more than 8000 samples collected over a three-year period in New York City examined how antibody responses to the virus’s spike protein changed after infections, during the primary immunisation series, during monovalent and bivalent booster vaccination, and during breakthrough infections.

They found that upon primary immunisation, participants with pre-existing immunity (those who had previously been infected with the virus) mounted higher antibody responses faster and achieved higher steady-state antibody titres than individuals who had not been previously infected. The waning of antibody response was characterised by two phases: an initial rapid decay from the strong peak after vaccination, followed by a stabilisation phase with very slow decay, suggesting that antibody levels were very long-lasting. Booster vaccination equalised the differences in antibody concentration between participants with and without pre-existing immunity. Breakthrough infections increased antibodies to similar levels as an additional vaccine dose in individuals who had not previously been infected.

This investigation represents one of the most extensive and in-depth assessments of the longevity of SARS-CoV-2 immune responses to date. Its major conclusion is that changes in the virus that allow it to evade immunity, rather than waning immunity, are the major reason for breakthrough infections.

“Ours is one of the longest-running COVID-19 studies out there,” said Viviana Simon, MD, PhD, Professor of Microbiology, Medicine and Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, at Icahn Mount Sinai and lead author of the paper. “Following the same group of people monthly over time is rare and powerful because you can compare immune responses on an individual level. SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, so this research is important to provide an understanding about the impact of new variants and new vaccine doses on a healthy immune system, and to guide all of us to make the best choices to maintain protection against the virus that continues to circulate in our communities.”

This in-depth analysis was made possible through the Protection Associated with Rapid Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 (PARIS) study, an observational, longitudinal cohort of health care workers of the Mount Sinai Health System that was initiated in April 2020. At that time, the densely populated New York metropolitan area was hit with an exponential increase in severe SARS-CoV-2 infections, and essential workers in the health care system were at high risk for infection. In response to the crisis, a team of leading virologists, physician-scientists, and pathologists at Mount Sinai established a specific and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to accurately measure the SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres. This test was used to measure immune responses in the PARIS cohort in order to determine how quickly the antibody defences were mounted and much these changed over the months and years of follow up.

In addition to showing the impact on a person’s individual antibody response to vaccines based on the type of vaccine received and whether or not they were infected before receiving the first dose, the PARIS study made possible the development of a mathematical model that can be used to predict and characterize antibody responses of both individual people and populations.

“People have pandemic fatigue and vaccine uptake has slowed, especially after the vaccines started to be charged to insurance,” said Komal Srivastava, MS, Director of Strategy and Operation of the Mount Sinai Center for Vaccine Research and Pandemic Preparedness and co-first author of the paper. “We were pleasantly surprised to see that the booster doses promoted a large antibody response regardless of a person’s personal infection history, so we are hopeful that our study findings will encourage people to get their vaccine boosters when eligible and to stay engaged in research. Our work also showcases the impact of viral evolution over time and why it’s critical to keep studies like this going, despite the pandemic fatigue.”

According to the research team, the PARIS model has broad applications for studying the kinetics of antibodies produced to different COVID vaccines in diverse populations. They stress much more work remains to analyse side effects, applications of the antibody model and continued research about new vaccines and viral variants.

“This study adds an essential piece of data to understand the intricate immune response elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination,” says Juan Manuel Carreno Quiroz, PhD, Assistant Professor in the Department of Microbiology and co-first author of the paper. “In light of the emerging viral variants, which predominantly induce a cross-reactive antibody response against the spike protein, it will be exciting to characterise in depth the role of these antibodies – in particular the non-neutralising ones – in protection against the most recent circulating viral variants. Likewise, monitoring the induction of variant-specific antibodies after multiple exposures by breakthrough infections and by administration of updated COVID-19 vaccines, such as the XBB.1.5 monovalent booster, will be key to understand the evolution of the antibody response over time.”

Source: The Mount Sinai Hospital / Mount Sinai School of Medicine

Categories : COVID Pain ManagementTags :

Does COVID Infection or Vaccination Worsen Migraines?

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Usman Yousaf on Unsplash

Headaches are a frequent complaint of those with a COVID infection, or have received a COVID vaccination, and it is thought that it may subsequently increase the frequency of migraines. To put this to the test, an observational study published in the European Journal of Neurology investigated the effects on migraine frequency of having had either been infected with COVID or having received a COVID vaccination.

Among 550 adults who had received migraine-related care at a Spanish headache clinic, 44.9% (247) reported COVID at least once and 83.3% (458) had been vaccinated; 61 patients (24.7%) reported migraine worsening since COVID and 52 (11.4%) since vaccination.

In participants who perceived that their migraines worsened, those who had been infected were 2.5-times more likely to be concerned about migraine worsening and patients who had been vaccinated were 17.3-times more likely to have this concern.

When investigators examined patients’ e-diary information, they observed no significant difference in headache frequency one month before and after infection or vaccination, even when comparing patients with and without self-reported migraine worsening.

“In the case of COVID-19, we reported previously that indeed headache is a frequent and disabling symptom of the infection; yet, it may not necessarily be linked to an increase in migraine frequency,” the authors wrote. “In light of our results, we believe that clinicians should deliver to patients a more reassuring message that COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines may marginally affect migraine course and that probably the impact of the infection and vaccines is less than the individual rhythmicity to have attacks. This information may help minimise their worry.”

Source: Wiley

Categories : COVID General InterestTags :

New Podcast Series Reflects on Childhood in South Africa Through and Beyond COVID-19

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Hush Naidoo Jade Photography on Unsplash

The ‘Phezulu: Looking Up’ podcast series launched today by UNICEF South Africa (https://www.UNICEF.org/SouthAfrica/) tells the stories of the impact of the COVID-19 years on children and young people and how, with the right support and opportunities, children and young people are determined to build a safer, fairer and better post pandemic South Africa.  

The eight-part series delves into issues such as mental wellbeing, disrupted education and access to child healthcare; including routine childhood immunisations, through the voices of children and young people and experts working to mitigate the impact.

“Children and adolescents were affected by every aspect of the COVID-19 pandemic and this podcast series tells their stories of resilience,” said Muriel Mafico, UNICEF South Africa Deputy Representative. “Importantly, the episodes also reflect on the response to share learnings, including how the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccine saved countless lives and re-opened our world,”

The podcast series features expert analysis and voices, including contributions from academics, all of whom continue to play a critical role in the ongoing recovery for every child. The series not only highlights the indirect impact of COVID-19 on children and youth, but also how COVID-19 vaccinations changed the trajectory of the crisis by enabling children and adolescents to resume their childhoods.

The series will be available on a weekly basis, on all major podcast platforms from 23rd May 2023. Listeners can now subscribe and join the conversation. This production was made possible thanks to the generous support of the German Federal Foreign Office and other partners.

For more information, please see the following links:
https://www.UNICEF.org/southafrica/
https://apo-opa.info/42dIxHD

Categories : COVIDTags :

COVID-19: What Next as Shots Expire and Become Harder to Get?

On By ModernMedia

By Adele Baleta for Spotlight

Millions of doses of the Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 vaccine procured by the South African government have expired and the shot is largely unavailable to people in the country.

Several people who have contacted Spotlight have expressed “frustration” and “dismay” that despite government having announced in February that it was sitting on a massive stockpile of almost 30 million vaccines, they are struggling to access the Pfizer shot.

Explaining the vast quantity of unused vaccines, the Health Department at the time said vaccine uptake has been low due to decreasing cases, people’s erroneous perception that the pandemic is over, and hesitancy affected by vaccine disinformation.

Expired but not expired?

National Department of Health spokesperson Foster Mohale confirmed that seven million Pfizer doses had expired but they would not be disposed of. Instead, the vaccine manufacturers would test the vaccines to ensure continued safety and efficacy. The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) will review the test results and, if satisfied that the vaccine will still work as well as data showed before, they will approve an extended shelf life.

The remaining estimated 23 million Johnson and Johnson (J&J) vaccine doses in South Africa are due to expire in 2024 and 2025.

“The expiry of a vaccine is not the same as the expiry date of food which cannot be extended,” Mohale says, adding that the Pfizer vaccine has a short shelf life and that the vaccine’s expiry date has been extended twice in the past. He says the testing should be done by June and the Pfizer shots would become available in July.

Photo by Mat Napo on Unsplash

A mother from East London, who is hoping to emigrate to the United States, told Spotlight that she was “frantically” trying to get shots for her 12-year-old son in time to leave. In South Africa, none of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines have been authorised for use in children under the age of 16. Elsewhere in the world, for example, in the United States, the Pfizer vaccine has been tested and authorised for use for children from the age of 12. “It is mandatory that he get the vaccine before entering the United States,” she says.

An intern responding to people’s questions on the Department of Health’s hotline says, “Many callers have phoned in stressing about travelling, emigrating, or getting vaccinated for the first time. We have been told that there are very few sites that still have some stock. If people have had two Pfizer doses, they can boost with a J&J dose. However, if they have only had one Pfizer, they will have to wait.”

The public exasperation expressed directly to Spotlight and on social media also relates to the health department’s vaccination website being outdated and it being hard to find places to get vaccinated. As GroundUp reported in January, getting a COVID-19 booster jab is not as easy as it should be.

‘The pandemic is not over’

Referring to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) lifting of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on May 5th, Mohale says, “The pandemic is not over and people, especially those who are at highest risk of severe disease and death should get vaccinated.” These included people with co-morbidities and the elderly. He says vaccination for COVID-19 has been integrated into routine primary healthcare facilities, which is where people should go for their jabs.

WHO director-general Tedros Ghebreyesus said it was the end of the emergency phase but not the end of the threat of COVID-19. In the week prior to the announcement, he said the disease claimed a life (globally) every three minutes, “and that’s just the deaths we know about”.

The decision to lift the emergency was based on the decreasing number of deaths and hospitalisations from COVID-19, the high levels of population immunity against SARS-CoV-2, and the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.

Ghebreyesus warned that the COVID-19 pandemic is not over and that the virus could still pose a serious threat to public health. The WHO has urged countries to continue to monitor the situation closely and to maintain preparedness measures, such as surveillance, testing, and contact tracing.

Some experts have criticised the WHO’s decision to end the emergency phase, arguing that it is premature and could lead to a resurgence of the pandemic. Others have defended the decision, arguing that it is based on the best available evidence and that it is important to give countries the flexibility to manage the pandemic in a way that best suits their own circumstances.

‘Momentous’ announcement

Professor Salim Abdool Kariem, Director of CAPRISA, described the announcement as “momentous”. Writing in his regular COVID-19 updates blog, he says, “… we are still living in the midst of a pandemic with thousands of cases each day. Since SARS-CoV-2 is going to be with us for a long time, a pragmatic decision was needed as the COVID-19 pandemic emergency has been steadily receding and a new variant of concern has not emerged in the last 17 months. But the risk of a new variant of concern is ever-present, even if it is getting progressively smaller with time. The public is also tired of the pandemic and many have simply put it out of sight and out of mind.”

Kariem writes that globally there are currently far more COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths each day than we had on the day (30 January 2020) that COVID-19 was initially declared a PHEIC. “So, it (the WHO decision) was not based on the situation getting to a point pre-PHEIC. Waiting to reach that point may take many years or may never happen and so ending the PHEIC is a judgement call, taking many factors into consideration.”

‘Still with us’

Speaking at a recent webinar, hosted by Internews, science writer David Quammen, who wrote a book on COVID-19 called ‘Breathless: The Scientific Race to Defeat a Deadly Virus’ and before that, ‘Spillover’, says, “The coronavirus is still with us, it’s circulating worldwide among humans, and circulating also among whitetail deer, feral mink, and probably other wild mammals.”

He says efforts currently need to be directed to approaching COVID-19 as a long-term cause of human illness, suffering, and death, not “a short-term catastrophe”.

He says laboratory techniques need to be improved as well as manufacturing capacity for updated COVID-19 vaccines. Inequitable access to vaccines will need to be solved. “We will need to dissolve vaccine reluctance and refusal – among the privileged but obdurate, and also among those historically ill-served by Western medicine – with better communication and education.” Diagnostic testing needs to be maintained and not reduced, as well as the sequencing of genomes from patient samples to detect and trace new and immune-evasive variants, he says.

“We will need to prepare, not just for the next coming of SARS-CoV-2 (when it emerges from some infected human, or some deer or mink) but also for the next coronavirus or influenza virus (more than likely H1N1) or other highly adaptive animal-borne virus (there’s a whole rogue’s list of possibilities) that appears in humans, seemingly out of nowhere,” he says. “But they don’t come out of nowhere. They come from nature.”

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons4.0 licence.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease COVIDTags :

Myocarditis Study Points to ‘Over-revved’ Immune System from COVID Jab

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

With the administration of the first COVID vaccines two years ago, public health officials found an increase in cases of myocarditis, particularly among young males who had been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. The underlying cause of these reactions remained a mystery.

Now Yale scientists have identified the immune signature of these heart inflammation cases. Published in the journal Science Immunology, their findings eliminate some of the theorised causes of the heart inflammation and point to the consequences of a slightly over-stimulated immune system.

Myocarditis is a generally mild inflammation of heart tissue which can cause scarring but is usually resolved within days. The increased incidence of myocarditis during vaccination was seen primarily in males in their teens or early 20s, who had been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, which are designed to elicit immune responses specifically to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among males aged 12 to 17, about 22 to 36 per 100 000 experienced myocarditis within 21 days after receiving a second vaccine dose. The incidence of myocarditis was 50.1 to 64.9 cases per 100 000 after infection with the COVID virus among males in this age group.

For the new study, the Yale research team conducted a detailed analysis of immune system responses in those rare cases of myocarditis among vaccinated individuals. They found that the heart inflammation was not caused by antibodies created by the vaccine, but rather by a more generalised response involving immune cells and inflammation.

“The immune systems of these individuals get a little too revved up and over-produce cytokine and cellular responses,” said team leader Carrie Lucas, associate professor of immunobiology.

Earlier research had suggested that increasing the time between vaccination shots from four to eight weeks may reduce risk of developing myocarditis.

Lucas noted that, according to CDC findings, the risk of myocarditis is significantly greater in unvaccinated individuals who contract COVID than in the vaccinated. She emphasised that vaccination offers the best protection from COVID-related disease.

“I hope this new knowledge will enable further optimising mRNA vaccines, which, in addition to offering clear health benefits during the pandemic, have a tremendous potential to save lives across numerous future applications,” said Anis Barmada, an MD/PhD student at Yale School of Medicine, who is a co-first author of the paper with Jon Klein, also a Yale MD/PhD student.

Source: Yale University

Categories : COVID VaccinesTags :

COVID Vaccination Protection Wanes Faster in People with Obesity

On By ModernMedia
Antibodies by Pikisuperstar on Freepix

According to new research from the Universities of Cambridge and Edinburgh, COVID vaccination protection in people with severe obesity wanes faster than in people of normal weight. The study suggests that people with obesity are likely to need more frequent booster doses to maintain their immunity.

Previous studies on COVID vaccines have suggested that antibody levels may be lower in vaccinated people who have obesity and that they may remain at higher risk of severe disease than vaccinated people with normal weight. The reasons for this have, however, remained unclear.

This study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, shows that the ability of antibodies to neutralise the virus (their ‘neutralisation capacity’) declines faster in vaccinated people who have obesity. The findings have important implications for vaccine prioritisation policies around the world.

During the pandemic, people with obesity were more likely to be hospitalised, require ventilators and to die from COVID. In this study, supported by the NIHR Bioresource and funded by UKRI, the researchers set out to investigate how far two of the most extensively used vaccines protect people with obesity compared to those with a normal weight, over time.

A team from the University of Edinburgh looked at real-time data tracking the health of 3.5 million people in the Scottish population as part of the EAVE II study. They looked at hospitalisation and mortality from COVID in adults who received two doses of COVID vaccine (either Pfizer-BioNTech or AstraZeneca).

They found that people with severe obesity (a BMI > 40kg/m2) had a 76% higher risk of severe COVID outcomes, compared to those with a normal BMI. A modest increase in risk was also seen in people with obesity (30-39.9kg/m2), which affects a quarter of the UK population, and those who were underweight. ‘Break-through infections’ after the second vaccine dose also led to hospitalisation and death sooner (from 10 weeks) among people with severe obesity, and among people with obesity (after 15 weeks), than among individuals with normal weight (after 20 weeks).

University of Edinburg leader Prof Sir Aziz Sheikh said: “Our findings demonstrate that protection gained through COVID vaccination drops off faster for people with severe obesity than those with a normal body mass index. Using large-scale data assets such as the EAVE II Platform in Scotland have enabled us to generate important and timely insights that enable improvements to the delivery of COVID vaccine schedules in a post-pandemic UK.”

The University of Cambridge team studied people with severe obesity attending the Obesity clinic at Addenbrooke’s Hospital in Cambridge, and compared the number and function of immune cells in their blood to those of people of normal weight.

They studied people six months after their second vaccine dose and then looked at the response to a third ‘booster’ vaccine dose over time. The Cambridge researchers found that six months after a second vaccine dose, people with severe obesity had similar levels of antibodies to the COVID virus as those with a normal weight – but those antibodies were less effecctive.

The antibodies’ neutralisation capacity was reduced in 55% of individuals with severe obesity were found to have unquantifiable or undetectable ‘neutralising capacity’ compared to 12% of people with normal BMI.

“This study further emphasises that obesity alters the vaccine response and also impacts on the risk of infection,” said first author Dr Agatha van der Klaauw. “We urgently need to understand how to restore immune function and minimise these health risks.”

The researchers found that antibodies produced by people with severe obesity were less effective at neutralising the SARS-CoV-2 virus, potentially because the antibodies were not able to bind to the virus with the same strength.

When given a third (booster) dose of a COVID vaccine, neutralisation capacity was restored in both the normal weight and severely obese groups. But the researchers found that immunity again declined more rapidly in people with severe obesity, putting them at greater risk of infection with time.

Categories : COVID Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Limited Evidence for Menstrual Changes After COVID Vaccination

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Gustavo Fring on Pexels

Results from a Swedish study of nearly three million women and girls published by The BMJ found that there was no evidence of an increased risk of post-COVID vaccination menstrual changes that were significant enough for healthcare interaction.

The researchers found only weak and inconsistent associations were found between COVID vaccination and contact with healthcare for postmenopausal bleeding. These were even less consistent for menstrual disturbance and premenstrual bleeding.

These findings do not provide any substantial support for a causal association between COVID vaccination and diagnoses related to menstrual or bleeding disorders, say the researchers.

Many women have reported changes to their periods after a COVID vaccination, such as the number of days they bleed and the heaviness of the flow. Self-reporting may capture events that normally would not result in a healthcare contact but may still be sufficiently disturbing to be relevant for the affected women. But calculating the strength of a potential association based on self reports can be unreliable.

To address this, researchers in Sweden drew on high quality health registry data to evaluate the risks of menstrual disturbance and bleeding after COVID vaccination in 2 946 448 women and girls aged 12-74 years from December 2020 to February 2022.

Contact with healthcare included primary care visits, specialist outpatient visits, and days of hospital stay related to menstrual disturbance or bleeding before or after menopause.

Risks were assessed by vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Oxford-AstraZeneca) and dose (unvaccinated and first, second, and third dose) over two time windows (1-7 days, considered the control period, and 8-90 days).

In the main analysis, more than 2.5 million (88%) of women received at least one covid-19 vaccination and over 1.6 million (64%) of vaccinated women received three doses during the study period.

The highest risks for bleeding in postmenopausal women were seen after the third dose in the 1-7 days risk window (28%) and in the 8-90 days risk window (25%).

Adjusting for socioeconomic factors, previous healthcare use, and for several specific medical conditions had only a modest effect on these results.

Analyses of individual vaccines and risk of postmenopausal bleeding suggested a 23-33% increased risk after 8-90 days with Pfizer-BioNTech, and Moderna after the third dose, but a less clear association with Oxford-AstraZeneca.

In premenopausal women, weak associations were found for menstrual disturbance or bleeding after vaccination with any dose (13% or 8% after 1-7 days and 6% or 1% after 8-90 days, respectively). However, adjusting for other factors almost completely removed these weak associations, suggesting that a causal effect is unlikely.

These are observational findings and the authors point to several limitations, including the fact that the time between onset, start of symptoms, and date of healthcare contact might be considerable, making the interpretation of effect of different risk windows challenging. 

But this was a large study with near complete follow-up, using mandatory data from nationwide registers.

As such, they say: “We observed weak and inconsistent associations between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts for postmenopausal bleeding, and even less consistent for menstrual disturbance, and premenstrual bleeding.”

They add: “These findings do not provide any substantial support for a causal association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and healthcare contacts related to menstrual or bleeding disorders.”

Source: The BMJ