Cardiac CT Matches Coronary Angiography with Fewer Complications
A clinical trial found that cardiac computed tomography (CT) offers similar diagnostic accuracy to catheterisation – the current standard diagnostic test for intermediate-risk patients – in people with suspected coronary artery disease, as well as being associated with a lower risk of complications. The trial’s findings were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The current standard diagnostic test for coronary artery disease (CAD) is coronary angiography (often along with cardiac catheterisation). This minimally invasive procedure uses dye marker visible on X-ray imaging to detect arterial narrowing. Any narrowing detected in this manner can be treated during the procedure itself using stents, which prop open the newly widened blood vessels. More than 3.5 million of these procedures are carried out in European catheterisation laboratories every year, and more are carried out every year. Approximately two million of these do not involve immediate treatment in the cath lab. In these cases, the procedure is able to rule out narrowed or blocked coronary arteries.
The main question addressed by the DISCHARGE Trial Group was whether the low-risk, non-invasive coronary CT method can provide a safe alternative to catheterization in certain patients with suspected CAD. In order to test the effectiveness of both of these diagnostic imaging techniques in patients with stable chest pain, the project followed more than 3500 patients for a duration of four years. Patients were randomised to either computed tomography or cardiac catheterisation. If their initial evaluation ruled out obstructive coronary artery disease, participants were discharged back to their referring physician for further treatment – a step which gave the trial its name: DISCHARGE. Patients who were diagnosed as having the disease were managed in accordance with European guidelines at the time of the study.
Discussing the long-term results, trial leader Professor Dr Marc Dewey said: “The trial confirmed that a CT-based management is safe in patients with stable (ie, non-acute) chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease.”
Evaluation of safety was based on the incidence of major cardiovascular events over a period of up to four years. He added: “Among the patients referred for cardiac catheterisation and included in this trial, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was found to be similar in both the CT and catheterisation groups, occurring in 2.1% and 3.0% of patients, respectively. The incidence of major procedure-related complications was found to be four-times lower in patients managed with an initial CT strategy.”
Other outcome measures were included in the DISCHARGE trial, such as improvements in chest pain and quality of life over the course of the trial. This new strategy could help relieve pressure on health care systems by helping to reduce the volume of catheterisation procedures. Prof Dewey said: “Now that CT has been standardised and quality-tested as part of the DISCHARGE trial, this method could be made more widely available as part of the routine clinical care of people with intermediate CAD risk.”
As a next step, the trial’s method for estimating a person’s clinical risk of having coronary artery disease will need to be further evaluated to determine whether it can improve referral and indication for CT in routine clinical care. Health economics are an important component in making decisions about reimbursement in health care systems. As mentioned in the discussion of the publication, further methodologically very rigorous cost-effectiveness analyses of CT and cardiac catheterisation are necessary and will be conducted by the DISCHARGE Trial Group.
Source: University of Glasgow
