Reduced Risk of Relapse in MS Sufferers Taking Cladribine
A study using real-world data has shown that multiple sclerosis (MS) sufferers taking cladribine were less likely to experience disease relapse than those who took other oral disease-modifying therapies.
Relapse and discontinuation outcomes favoured cladribine tablets over oral fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide. The findings were reported Helmut Butzkueven, PhD, of Monash University at ACTRIMS Forum 2022, the annual meeting of the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis.
For the study, researchers drew on data from the MSBase registry of more than 79 000 people with MS worldwide. Few clinical trials or real-world studies are available that compare the effectiveness of cladribine tablets to other oral disease-modifying therapies, the researchers noted.
“Many treatment choices that patients and their care teams have to make are not or not yet examined in classical randomised trials,” Dr Butzkueven told MedPage Today. “Sophisticated analysis of data gathered systematically and prospectively in clinical care is proving a valuable alternative to examine and compare the outcomes of different treatment choices in all kinds of scenarios.”
“Oral agents for use in relapsing MS are very convenient and effective treatment choices,” he added. “This work directly compares outcomes for people with MS who chose cladribine tablets versus other oral drugs.”
The chemotherapy drug cladribine, was recently approved by the FDA for active secondary progressive disease and relapsing MS. This was based on results from trial data showing that cladribine significantly decreased the number of MS relapses and reduced the progression of disability compared with placebo.
GLIMPSE was a longitudinal study that included data for 3475 MS patients on either cladribine, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate or teriflunomide.
The 633 patients taking cladribine were propensity-score matched with those taking oral comparators on various factors such as age, sex and country.
In pairwise comparisons, cladribine versus fingolimod had 520 matched participants per group: the annualised relapse rate (ARR) was 0.09 compared with 0.15, respectively, the hazard ratio (HR) for time to first relapse was 0.60, and the HR for time to discontinuation was 0.22.
For cladribine versus dimethyl fumarate (450 people per group), the ARR was 0.10 compared with 0.15 the HR for time to first relapse was 0.58, and the HR for time to discontinuation was 0.10.
The cladribine versus teriflunomide (458 people per group) comparisons showed that the ARR was 0.09 compared with 0.17, the HR for time to first relapse was 0.33, and the HR for time to discontinuation was 0.10.
Source: MedPage Today
