Tag: cardiac arrest

Categories : Emergency MedicineTags : Leave a comment

CPR with Breaths Essential for Cardiac Arrest after Drowning

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Kampus Production

Updated guidance reaffirms the recommendation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and highlights the importance of compressions with rescue breaths as a first step in responding to cardiac arrest following drowning, according to a new, focused update to Special Circumstances Guidelines from the American Heart Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics. The recommendations were published simultaneously in Circulation (focusing on adults) and Pediatrics (focusing on children).

Drowning is the third-leading cause of death from unintentional injury worldwide. The World Health Organization estimates there are about 236 000 deaths due to drowning each year globally. According to the CDC, it’s the number one cause of death for children ages 1-4 years old in the US.

“The focused update on drowning contains the most up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations on how to resuscitate someone who has drowned, offering practical guidance for health care professionals, trained rescuers, caregivers and families,” said writing group Co-Chair Tracy E. McCallin, M.D., FAAP, associate professor of paediatrics in the division of paediatric emergency medicine at Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital in Cleveland. “While we work on a daily basis to lower risks of drowning through education and community outreach on drowning prevention, we still need emergency preparedness training that can be used in tragic circumstances if a drowning occurs.”  

Detailed in the new guideline update:

  • Anyone removed from the water without showing signs of normal breathing or consciousness should be presumed to be in cardiac arrest.
  • Rescuers should immediately initiate CPR that includes rescue breathing in addition to chest compressions. Multiple large studies over time show more people with cardiac arrest from non-cardiac causes such as drowning survive when CPR includes rescue breaths compared to Hands-Only CPR (calling 911 [10111 in South Africa] and pushing hard and fast in the centre of the chest).

Drowning generally progresses quickly from initial respiratory arrest (when a person is unable to breathe) to cardiac arrest, meaning that the heart stops beating. As a result, blood cannot circulate properly throughout the body, and it is starved of oxygen.

“CPR for cardiac arrest due to drowning must focus on restoring breathing as well as restoring blood circulation,” said writing group Co-Chair Cameron Dezfulian, MD, FAHA, FAAP, senior faculty in paediatrics and critical care at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston.

“Cardiac arrest following drowning is most often due to severe hypoxia, or low blood oxygen levels,“ Dezfulian said. ”This differs from sudden cardiac arrest from a cardiac cause where the individual generally collapses with fully oxygenated blood.”

The updated guidance advises untrained rescuers and the public to:

  • Provide CPR with breaths and compressions to all people who have a cardiac arrest after drowning. If a person is untrained, unwilling, or unable to give breaths, they can provide chest compressions only until help arrives. 
  • In-water rescue breathing should be given only by rescuers trained in this special skill if it doesn’t compromise their own safety. Trained rescuers should also provide supplemental oxygen if available.
  • The initiation of CPR should always be prioritised and begin as soon as possible as early lay responder CPR has been shown to improve outcomes from drowning.
  • The writing group recommends an automated external defibrillator (AED) should be placed in public facilities where aquatic activities are present such as swimming pools or beaches. They can be used once the person is removed from the water, if available, yet should not delay initiation of CPR. If available, the AED should be connected to the patient to assess for shockable rhythms once CPR is ongoing. Although most cases of cardiac arrest following drowning do not have shockable rhythms, if a primary cardiac event such as a heart attack occurs while in the water, the best outcomes are when defibrillation is done quickly. AED use is safe and feasible in aquatic environments.
  • All individuals requiring any level of resuscitation following drowning, including those who only need rescue breaths, should be transported to a hospital for evaluation, monitoring and treatment.

In addition to the recommendations on drowning resuscitation, the guideline update also highlights the Drowning Chain of Survival, which includes the steps needed to improve chances of survival: prevention, recognition and safe rescue.

Prevention

It has been estimated that more than 90% of all drownings are preventable. Research has found most infants drown in bathtubs, and the majority of preschool-aged children drown in swimming pools. The American Heart Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend being water aware and practicing water safety. See: Prevention of Drowning and other guidelines.  

Recognition

Recognition of drowning may be challenging because someone who is drowning may not be able to verbalise distress or signal for help. Drowning happens quickly. People in distress will rapidly submerge, lose consciousness and may be hidden from anyone not actively seeking them.

Safe Rescue and Removal

The guideline update recommends that appropriately trained rescuers, such as lifeguards, swim instructors or first responders, should provide in-water rescue breathing to an unresponsive person who has drowned if it does not compromise their own safety. Previous studies have proven this leads to more favourable survival outcomes. A drowning person who is unconscious and likely in cardiac arrest should be removed from the water in a near-horizontal position, with the head maintained above body level and airway open. If the drowning individual is conscious, a more vertical position may be preferable to reduce the risk of vomiting.

In summary, “These updated guidelines are based on the latest available evidence and are designed to inform trained rescuers and the public how to proceed in resuscitating people who have drowned. Drowning can be fatal. Our recommendations maximise balancing the need for rapid rescue and resuscitation, while prioritising rescuer safety,” Dezfulian said.

Source: American Heart Association

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease Emergency MedicineTags : Leave a comment

Bystander CPR up to 10 Minutes after Cardiac Arrest may Protect Brain Function

On By ModernMedia
Photo by www.testen.no on Unsplash

The sooner a lay rescuer (bystander) starts cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on a person having a cardiac arrest at home or in public, up to 10 minutes after the arrest, the better the chances of saving the person’s life and protecting their brain function, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Heart Association’s Resuscitation Science Symposium 2024.

Cardiac arrest, which occurs when the heart malfunctions and abruptly stops beating, is often fatal without quick medical attention such as CPR to increase blood flow to the heart and brain. More than 357 000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests happen each year in the US, with a 9.3% survival rate. “Our findings reinforce that every second counts when starting bystander CPR and even a few minutes delay can make a big difference,” said first author Evan O’Keefe, MD, a cardiovascular fellow at Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City. “If you see someone in need of CPR, don’t dwell on how long they’ve been down, your quick actions could save their life.”

The study analysed nearly 200 000 cases of witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to determine whether initiating CPR within different time windows, compared to outcomes with no bystander CPR administered, made a difference in survival and brain function after hospital discharge.

“We found that people who received bystander CPR within the first few minutes of their cardiac arrest were much more likely to survive and have better brain function than those who didn’t,” O’Keefe said. “The longer it took for CPR to start, the less survival benefit one received. However, even when CPR was started up to 10 minutes after cardiac arrest, there was still a significant survival benefit compared to individuals who did not receive CPR from a bystander.”

Results also found: 

  • People who received CPR within two minutes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest had an 81% higher rate of survival to release from the hospital and 95% higher rate of surviving without significant brain damage compared to people who did not receive bystander CPR.
  • Even people who received bystander CPR up to 10 minutes after cardiac arrest were 19% more likely to survive to hospital discharge and 22% more likely to have a favorable neurological outcome than those who did not receive bystander CPR at all.
  • For those who did not receive bystander CPR, about 12% survived to be released from the hospital, and more than 9% survived without significant brain damage or major disabilities. When bystander CPR was initiated more than 10 minutes after cardiac arrest, bystander CPR, compared to not receiving the lifesaving assistance, was no longer associated with improved survival.

“These results highlight the critical importance of quick action in emergencies. It suggests that we need to focus on teaching more people how to perform CPR, and we also need to emphasise ways to get help to those suffering cardiac arrest faster,” O’Keefe said. “This might include more widespread CPR training programs, as well as better public access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and improved dispatch systems.”

O’Keefe noted that future research could explore how technology (like apps that alert nearby trained bystanders or alert dispatchers to likely cardiac arrest) may help to reduce the time to first intervention, information that could be important for emergency dispatchers and policymakers in the development of public interventions for cardiac arrest.

“This study highlights the need for prompt recognition and treatment of cardiac arrest by bystanders. Time is of the essence when a cardiac arrest occurs, and late interventions can be as ineffective as no intervention. Community education and empowerment are critical for us to save lives,” said American Heart Association volunteer expert Anezi Uzendu, MD, an interventional cardiologist at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and a cardiac arrest survivor.

A limitation of the study includes that the average time of arrival for emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to the person having cardiac arrest was roughly 10 minutes. This means that in this study, the people who received bystander CPR 10 minutes after their cardiac arrest were likely being compared to a group receiving professional medical attention.

Study details and background:

  • The study identified 160 822 witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests that occurred from 2013-2022.  Among the people whose data was analysed, the average age was 64 years old and about 34% were women.
  • Researchers used data from the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), a national, web-based health registry focused on helping communities improve care for and survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
  • The research categorized time to initiation of bystander CPR in two-minute intervals and analysed the link between each time interval, compared to the group who did not receive CPR, with survival to hospital discharge and favourable neurological survival, or surviving with minor disabilities.

Source: American Heart Association

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease Emergency MedicineTags : 1 Comment

New Approach to Defibrillation may Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Mikhail Nilov

Joshua Lupton, MD, has no memory of his own cardiac arrest in 2016. He only knows that first responders resuscitated his heart with a shock from a defibrillator, ultimately leading to his complete recovery and putting him among fewer than one in 10 people nationwide who survive cardiac arrest outside of a hospital.

He attributes his survival to the rapid defibrillation he received from first responders – but not everybody is so fortunate.

Now, as lead author on an observational study published in JAMA Network Open, he and co-authors from Oregon Health & Science University say the study suggests the position in which responders initially place the two defibrillator pads on the body may make a significant difference in returning spontaneous blood circulation after shock from a defibrillator.

“The less time that you’re in cardiac arrest, the better,” said Lupton, assistant professor of emergency medicine in the OHSU School of Medicine. “The longer your brain has low blood flow, the lower your chances of having a good outcome.”

Researchers used data from the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry, which comprehensively recorded the placement position of defibrillation pads from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023. For purposes of the study, researchers reviewed 255 cases treated by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, where the two pads were placed either at the front and side or front and back.

They found placing the pads in front and back had 2.64-fold greater odds of returning spontaneous blood circulation, compared with placing the pads on the person’s front and side.

The current common knowledge among health care professionals is that pad placement – whether front and side, or front and back – is equally beneficial in cardiac arrest. The researchers cautioned that their new study is only observational and not a definitive clinical trial. Yet, given the crucial importance of reviving the heartbeat as quickly as possible, the results do suggest a benefit from placing the pads on the front and back rather than the front and side.

“The key is, you want energy that goes from one pad to the other through the heart,” said senior author Mohamud Daya, MD, professor of emergency medicine in the OHSU School of Medicine.

Placing the pads in the front and back may effectively “sandwich” the heart, raising the possibility that the electrical current will be delivered more comprehensively to the organ. 

However, that’s not readily possible in many cases. For example, the patient may be overweight or positioned in such a way that they can’t be easily moved.

“It can be hard to roll people,” said Daya, who also serves as medical director for Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. “Emergency medical responders can often do it, but the lay public may not be able to move a person. It’s also important to deliver the electrical current as quickly as possible.”

In that respect, pad placement is only one factor among many in successfully treating cardiac arrest.

Lupton survived his cardiac arrest and went on to complete medical school at the very hospital where he spent several days recovering in the intensive care unit – Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. The episode led him to alter the focus of his research so that he could examine ways to optimise early care for cardiac arrest patients.

The results of the new study surprised him.

“I didn’t expect to see such a big difference,” he said. “The fact that we did may light a fire in the medical community to fund some additional research to learn more.”

Source: Oregon Health & Science University

Categories : Hospitals NeurologyTags :

New Evidence of Patients Recalling Death Experiences after Cardiac Arrest

On By ModernMedia

Up to an hour after cardiac arrest, some patients revived by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had clear memories afterward of experiencing death and had brain patterns while unconscious linked to thought and memory, report investigators in the journal Resuscitation.

In a study led by researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, some survivors of cardiac arrest described lucid death experiences that occurred while they were seemingly unconscious. Despite immediate treatment, fewer than 10% of the 567 patients studied, who received CPR in the hospital, recovered sufficiently to be discharged. Of the survivors, four in 10 recalled some degree of consciousness during CPR not captured by standard measures.

The study also found that in a subset of these patients, who received brain monitoring, nearly 40% had brain activity that returned to normal, or nearly normal, from a “flatline” state, at points even an hour into CPR. As captured by EEG, the patients saw spikes in the gamma, delta, theta, alpha, and beta waves associated with higher mental function.

Survivors have long reported having heightened awareness and powerful, lucid experiences, say the study authors. These have included a perception of separation from the body, observing events without pain or distress, and a meaningful evaluation of their actions and relationships. This new work found these experiences of death to be different from hallucinations, delusions, illusions, dreams, or CPR-induced consciousness.

The study authors hypothesise that the “flatlined”, dying brain removes natural inhibitory (braking) systems. These processes, known collectively as disinhibition, may open access to “new dimensions of reality,” they say, including lucid recall of all stored memories from early childhood to death, evaluated from the perspective of morality. While no one knows the evolutionary purpose of this phenomenon, it “opens the door to a systematic exploration of what happens when a person dies.”

Senior study author Sam Parnia, MD, PhD, associate professor in the Department of Medicine at NYU Langone Health and director of critical care and resuscitation research at NYU Langone, says, “Although doctors have long thought that the brain suffers permanent damage about 10 minutes after the heart stops supplying it with oxygen, our work found that the brain can show signs of electrical recovery long into ongoing CPR. This is the first large study to show that these recollections and brain wave changes may be signs of universal, shared elements of so-called near-death experiences.”

Dr Parnia adds, “These experiences provide a glimpse into a real, yet little understood dimension of human consciousness that becomes uncovered with death. The findings may also guide the design of new ways to restart the heart or prevent brain injuries and hold implications for transplantation.”

The AWAreness during REsuscitation (AWARE)-II study followed 567 adults who suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest between May 2017 and March 2020 in the US and UK. Only hospitalised patients were enrolled to standardise the CPR and resuscitation methods used, as well as recording methods for brain activity. A subset of 85 patients received brain monitoring during CPR. Additional testimony from 126 community survivors of cardiac arrest with self-reported memories was also examined to provide greater understanding of the themes related to the recalled experience of death.

The study authors conclude that research to date has neither proved nor disproved the reality or meaning of patients’ experiences and claims of awareness in relation to death. They say the recalled experience surrounding death merits further empirical investigation and plan to conduct studies that more precisely define biomarkers of clinical consciousness and that monitor the long-term psychological effects of resuscitation after cardiac arrest.

Source: Elsevier

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease GenderTags :

In Half of Sudden Cardiac Arrests, Symptoms Appear 24 Hours Earlier

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Camilo Jimenez on Unsplash

Thanks to a study recently published in The Lancet Digital Health, clinicians are one step closer to helping people catch a sudden cardiac arrest before it happens. The study, found that 50% of individuals who experienced a sudden cardiac arrest also experienced a telling symptom 24 hours before their loss of heart function.

The investigators from the Smidt Heart Institute at Mount Sinai also learned that this warning symptom was different for women than it was for men. For women, the most prominent symptom of an impending sudden cardiac arrest was shortness of breath, whereas men experienced chest pain. Smaller subgroups of both genders experienced abnormal sweating and seizure-like activity.

Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest is fatal 90% of the time, so there is an urgent need to better predict and prevent the condition.

“Harnessing warning symptoms to perform effective triage for those who need to make a 911 call could lead to early intervention and prevention of imminent death,” said sudden cardiac arrest expert Sumeet Chugh, MD, senior author of the study. “Our findings could lead to a new paradigm for prevention of sudden cardiac death.”

For this study, investigators used two established and ongoing community-based studies, each developed by Chugh: the ongoing Prediction of Sudden Death in Multi-Ethnic Communities (PRESTO) Study in Ventura County, California, and the Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study (SUDS), based in Portland, Oregon.

Both studies provide Cedars-Sinai investigators with unique, community-based data to establish how to best predict sudden cardiac arrest.

“It takes a village to do this work,” said Chugh. “We initiated the SUDS study 22 years ago and the PRESTO study eight years ago. These cohorts have provided invaluable lessons along the way. Importantly, none of this work would have been possible without the partnership and support of first responders, medical examiners and the hospital systems that deliver care within these communities.”  

In both the Ventura and Oregon studies, Smidt Heart Institute investigators evaluated the prevalence of individual symptoms and sets of symptoms prior to sudden cardiac arrest, then compared these findings to control groups that also sought emergency medical care.

The Ventura-based study showed that 50% of the 823 people who had a sudden cardiac arrest witnessed by a bystander or emergency medicine professional, such as an emergency medicine service (EMS) responder, experienced at least one telltale symptom before their deadly event. The Oregon-based study showed similar results.

“This is the first community-based study to evaluate the association of warning symptoms – or sets of symptoms – with imminent sudden cardiac arrest using a comparison group with EMS-documented symptoms recorded as part of routine emergency care,” said Eduardo Marbán, MD, PhD, executive director of the Smidt Heart Institute.

Such a study, Marbán says, paves the way for additional prospective studies that will combine all symptoms with other features to enhance prediction of imminent sudden cardiac arrest.

“Next we will supplement these key sex-specific warning symptoms with additional features – such as clinical profiles and biometric measures– for improved prediction of sudden cardiac arrest,” said Chugh.

Source: Cedars-Sinai

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

Cardiac Arrest Survivors have Better Outcomes if Cerebrovascular Regulation Kicks in

On By ModernMedia
Source: CC0

A study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients has shown that they have better neurological outcomes if a protective cerebrovascular regulation system reasserts itself. The research, published in the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, shows that this information can be used to assign more intensive rehabilitation, and also can be used to develop new interventions to improve cerebral perfusion.

Despite advances in treatment for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest and efforts to improve outcomes, many patients still suffer neurological sequelae (hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury, HIBI) even after return of spontaneous circulation. It is known that if brain function is maintained normally, there is a mechanism, cerebrovascular autoregulation (CVAR), that tries to maintain cerebral blood flow at a constant level even with changes in systemic blood pressure, but until now, it was unclear whether such a reaction occurs in the brain after resuscitation. Cerebral regional oxygen saturation (crSO2), a measure of oxygen supply and demand balance in the brain, is affected by blood pressure, and we focused on a method to evaluate the presence or absence of CVAR using this correlation. The researchers used this correlation to evaluate the presence or absence of CVAR in the post-resuscitated brain and assessed its relationship to life expectancy.

In this study, the research group analysed 100 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who were transported to the trauma and acute critical care centre of the Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine. CVAR was determined by calculating the moving Pearson correlation coefficient and by continuously monitoring crSO2 and mean blood pressure for 96 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Assuming undetected CVAR time as a bad exposure for the organism (time-dependent covariate), the researchers evaluated the association of life prognosis using Cox proportional hazards model. CVAR was detected in all 24 patients with good neuroprognosis (Cerebral Performance Scale5: CPC 1-2) out of 100 analysed subjects and in 65 (88%) of 76 patients with poor neuroprognosis (CPC 3-5). The analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that the survival rate decreased significantly as the undetected time of CVAR increased.

The results of this study have two major implications. First, the ability to identify subgroups with high mortality from early post-resuscitation clinical data can help identify populations that should receive enhanced therapeutic intervention. In addition, it may help to avoid early withdrawal of treatment from those who may recover. Secondly, we believe that intensive therapeutic management that maintains proper cerebral perfusion suggests improved life outcomes, and that developing a systemic management approach based on cerebral perfusion may be a breakthrough in reducing post-resuscitation neurological sequelae.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease COVIDTags :

European COVID Lockdowns Cost Heart Attack Patients up to Two Years of Life

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Camilo Jimenez on Unsplash

Patients who had heart attacks during the first COVID lockdown in the UK and Spain are predicted to live 1.5 and 2 years less, respectively, than their pre-COVID counterparts. That’s the finding of a study just published in European Heart Journal – Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes.

“Restrictions to treatment of life-threatening conditions have immediate and long-term negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole,” said study author Professor William Wijns of the Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Galway, Ireland. “Back-up plans must be in place so that emergency services can be retained even during natural or health catastrophes.”

Research has shown that during the first wave of the pandemic, about 40% fewer heart attack patients went to hospital as governments told people to stay at home, fear of catching the virus, and the stopping of some routine emergency care. Compared to receiving timely treatment, heart attack patients who stayed at home were more than twice as likely to die, while those who delayed going to the hospital were nearly twice as likely to have serious complications that could have been avoided.

Heart attacks require urgent treatment with stents (called percutaneous coronary intervention or PCI) to open the blocked artery and restore blood flow. Delays, and the resulting lack of oxygen, lead to irreversible damage of the heart muscle and can cause heart failure or other complications. When a large amount of heart tissue is damaged, potentially fatal cardiac arrest results.

This study estimated the long-term clinical and economic implications of reduced heart attack treatment during the pandemic in the UK and Spain. The researchers compared the predicted life expectancy of patients who had a heart attack during the first lockdown with those who had a heart attack at the same time in the previous year. The study focused on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), where a coronary artery is completely blocked. The researchers also compared the cost of STEMIs during lockdown with the equivalent period the year before.

A model was developed to estimate long-term survival, quality of life and costs related to STEMI. The UK analysis compared the period 23 March (when lockdown began) to 22 April 2020 with the equivalent time in 2019. The Spanish analysis compared March 2019 with March 2020 (lockdown began on 14 March 2020). Survival projections considered age, hospitalisation status and time to treatment using published data for each country. For example, using published data, it was estimated that 77% of STEMI patients in the UK were hospitalised prior to the pandemic compared with 44% during lockdown. The equivalent rates for Spain were 74% and 57%. The researchers also compared how many years in perfect health were lost for patients with a STEMI before versus during the pandemic.

The analysis predicted that patients who had a STEMI during the first UK lockdown would lose an average of 1.55 years of life compared to patients presenting with a STEMI before the pandemic. In addition, while alive, those with a STEMI during lockdown were predicted to lose approximately one year and two months of life in perfect health. The equivalent figures for Spain were 2.03 years of life lost and around one year and seven months of life in perfect health lost.

The cost analysis focused on initial hospitalisation and treatment, follow-up treatment, management of heart failure and productivity loss in patients unable to return to work. For example, the cost applied to a STEMI admission with PCI was £2837 in the UK and €8780 in Spain. Heart failure costs were estimated at £6086 in year one and £3882 in all subsequent years for the UK. The equivalent figures for Spain were €3815 (year one) and €2930 (each subsequent year).

Professor Wijns said: “The findings illustrate the repercussions of delayed or missed care. Patients and societies will pay the price of reduced heart attack treatment during just one month of lockdown for years to come. Health services need a list of lifesaving therapies that should always be delivered, and resilient healthcare systems must be established that can switch to emergency plans without delay. Public awareness campaigns should emphasise the benefits of timely care, even during a pandemic or other crisis.”

Source: European Society of Cardiology

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease Expert OpinionTags :

Consider More People with PE for Surgery, AHA Statement Urges

On By ModernMedia
Credit: American Heart Association

A new American Heart Association scientific statement suggests surgery be considered for more people with high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). The statement, published in the journal Circulation, also calls for data quality registries for high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism and more research to better understand the disease process and effective treatments.

Nearly 45% of patients experiencing PE will progress to severe symptoms, where the clot causes high pressure in the lungs and subsequent damage to the right heart chamber, with a high risk of death. Even therapy following current guideline-directed treatment has a high rate of death, estimated at approximately 40% of cases in some groups.

Treatment options for patients with severe pulmonary embolism include anticoagulation therapy or thrombolysis (either intravenously or via catheter procedure), or advanced surgical interventions such as surgical embolectomy and mechanical circulatory support. Often, surgical techniques are a last resort after other treatments are unsuccessful. The statement suggests that considering surgery earlier may help improve survival for patients with severe PE.

“This statement demonstrates that modern surgical management strategies and mechanical circulatory support results in excellent survival (97%) even among the sickest patients, including those who present with cardiac arrest and have had CPR,” said Joshua B. Goldberg, MD, chair of the statement writing group. 

“Modern surgical strategies and mechanical circulatory support are drastically underutilised,” he said. “It is the hope of the multidisciplinary group of authors that this scientific statement will provide a greater awareness of the safety and efficacy of modern surgical management and mechanical circulatory support in treating the most unstable patients so that lives may be saved. In addition, we hope this statement will facilitate improved understanding of the disease process and effective treatments and encourage future research to improve the survival of patients with this common and deadly disease.”  

The writing group proposes strategies to determine risk more accurately and identify earlier which PE patients may benefit from surgical intervention. They also suggest increased education for clinicians to encourage the use and integration of surgical strategies earlier in PE treatment. Additionally, the statement supports the development of patient registries, particularly focused on data that provides useful context for clinicians and surgeons to understand the progression from intermediate to high-risk pulmonary embolism and treatment outcomes across patients at various risk levels.

Source: American Heart Association

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease UncategorizedTags :

New Algorithm Predicts Sudden Cardiac Arrest Risk

On By ModernMedia
Ambulance
Photo by Camilo Jimenez on Unsplash

Cedars-Sinai researchers have developed a clinical algorithm that is the first to be able to distinguish between treatable sudden cardiac arrest and untreatable forms of the condition. The findings, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Clinical Electrophysiology, may help prevent sudden cardiac arrest based on key risk factors identified in this study.

“All sudden cardiac arrest is not the same,” explained Professor Sumeet Chugh, MD, lead author of the study. “Until now, no prior research has distinguished between potentially treatable sudden cardiac arrest versus untreatable forms that cause death in almost all instances.”

In the US, 300 000 people die due to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest each year. For those affected, 90% will die within 10 minutes of cardiac arrest.

Prevention could have an enormous impact for this largely fatal condition. The biggest challenge, however, lies in distinguishing between those who stand to benefit the most from an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and those who would not.

“Defibrillators are expensive and unnecessary for individuals with the type of sudden cardiac arrest that will not respond to an electrical shock,” said Prof Chugh. “However, for patients with treatable, or ‘shockable,’ forms of the disease, a defibrillator is lifesaving.”

Prof Chugh said that this new research provides a clinical risk assessment algorithm that can better identify patients at highest risk of treatable sudden cardiac arrest—and thus, a better understanding of those patients who would benefit from a defibrillator.

The risk assessment algorithm consists of 13 clinical, electrocardiogram, and echocardiographic variables that could put a patient at higher risk of treatable sudden cardiac arrest.

The risk factors include diabetes, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, seizure disorders, syncope—a temporary loss of consciousness caused by a fall in blood pressure—and four separate indicators found with an electrocardiogram test, including heart rate.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease NeurologyTags :

Antiepileptics in Comatose Cardiac Arrest Survivors are Ineffective, Study Shows

On By ModernMedia
Image by Falkurian Design on Unsplash

A large scale study of comatose intensive care (ICU) patients admitted after cardiac arrest and resuscitation has shown that antiepileptics to treat epilepsy-like brain activity has no effect, and may even prolong ICU stay.

Following a cardiac arrest and resuscitation, patients may need an ICU stay, and are in a coma. By that stage, the cardiac arrest may have damaged the brain to such an extent that half of the patients will not recover from coma. The other half will also have permanent damage, for example of memory functions. It is extremely difficult to predict if a patient will awaken and what their prognosis is, so clinicians make use of EEG (electroencephalography).

In 10–20% of the patients admitted to the ICU after cardiac arrest and resuscitation, there are signs of brain activity that appear similar to epilepsy: unlike an attack this activity is continuous. For a long time, it was unclear if anti-epileptic medication could help better recovery. As a result, some patients received this medication and some did not.

Now, a large-scale study done between 2014 and 2021 on 172 patients has proven that this medication is ineffective: it does not help recovery, even necessitating a longer ICU stay. The researchers, led by Professor Jeannette Hofmeijer of the University of Twente and Rijnstate Hospital in Arnhem, published their findings in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The conclusion from this study is that anti-epileptic medication does not lead to an improved recovery. The findings show that patients may need to stay longer at the ICU: for the patient an undesired situation, and it puts extra pressure on the health care system. 

Aside from patients who show continuous epileptic signals, a small group of patients show signs of a typical epileptic seizure: a short and heavy attack. In these situations, anti-epileptics could help, but this still needs further research.

“Although the outcome of the trial may be disappointing in terms of chances of recovery, it also takes away uncertainties from the family. The signals point at serious brain damage that would lead to a much longer stay at the ICU,” said Prof Hofmeijer.

Source: University of Twente