Tag: cancer

Categories : Cancer UncategorizedTags :

An Inspiration Led to Understanding Metformin’s Anti-tumour Effect

On By ModernMedia
Scientists report that metformin, used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, induces activation and proliferation of tumor-targeting CD8+ T-lymphocytes (CD8TIL), via mechanisms that involve the generation of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria of CD8TIL and an increase in glycolysis. Credit: Heiichiro Udono from Okayama University

Researchers in Japan have elucidated how the antidiabetic drug metformin exerts an anti-tumour effect as well.

Certain drugs like metformin have recently been found to have anti-cancer properties. Metformin appears to bolster anti-tumour immunity but the underlying immunological mechanisms were a mystery. With all the permutations and combinations of cancer, a blanket, yet targeted therapy would be ideal. 

Japanese scientists led by Professor Heiichiro Udono from Okayama University thus decided to address this oncological research question. In their recent study, they looked at how a specific subset of immune cells, called CD8+ infiltrating T-lymphocytes (CD8TIL), which specifically attack tumor cells, behaved in response to metformin. Their findings have been published as a research article in Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

Interestingly, Prof. Udono almost gave up on his anti-cancer pursuits, when he lost his own father to cancer. However, a bolt of inspiration came at a conference: “Nearly 10 years ago, a switch turned on in my head when I attended a Keystone Symposia discussing cancer, and hypoxia, held in Banff, Alberta. I realised that we had missed addressing Warburg effect, an effect which bolsters the growth of cancer, in our previous research. So, reverting Warburg effect to normal metabolic profile in cancers became a topic that got me thinking. Surprisingly, I got a hint from the same conference that metformin may aid cancer immunity. So, we got to work!”

Prof Udono and his team got to work, meticulously conducting a series of experiments on cancer cell lines, and ‘knockout gene’ mice, searching for possible biomolecules that result in metformin-dependent anti-tumour immunity. They probed the intracellular mechanisms in CD8TIL, when exposed to metformin, and assessed different biomarkers for growth. Given that CD8TIL produces proteins called interferons to attack cancer cells, they also assessed corresponding levels.

Accordingly, the scientists found that metformin causes the generation of reactive oxygen species in the mitochondria of CD8TIL (mtROS) and increases glycolysis. They also found that mtROS activated growth pathways in CD8TIL, allowing these cells to proliferate. Notably, this is achieved through a transcription factor involved in anti-oxidative stress response, called Nrf. Though metformin did not directly cause apoptosis, ‘cell suicide’ in tumours, it did cause CD8TIL to secrete interferon-ɣ to alter the tumour microenvironment in favour death of tumour cells.

Summing up the findings, Prof. Udono said: “More than anything else, our study provides the knowledge that we can ourselves protect our body from cancer. We hope that this understanding will result in not only the reduction of cancer incidence and improve treatment, but also will help prolong our life.”

The researchers also added that these findings strongly suggest the possibility of using metformin as a drug to strengthen anti-tumour immunity in patients with cancer. The findings appear in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Cancer Medical Research & TechnologyTags :

Telemedicine Popular Among People with Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay

Researchers reviewing patient surveys before and during the COVID pandemic found that nearly half preferred telemedicine and that general patient satisfaction scores were equally high for both video conferencing and office visits.

The study, published in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, assessed patient satisfaction and preferences for telemedicine. It found that 45% of people with cancer preferred telemedicine, while 34% preferred office visits, and 21% had no preference.

The researchers reviewed survey responses from 1077 radiation oncology patients across seven centres, with questionnaires based on office and telemedicine visits between December 2019 and June 2020. In terms of patient satisfaction, most reported either no difference or improvement with telemedicine overall (91%) compared to office visits, with similar results for their confidence in their physician (90%), understanding their treatment plans (88%), and confidence their cancer will be treated appropriately (87%).

Co-lead author Narek Shaverdian, MD, MSK Department of Radiation Oncology said: “These findings provide some evidence that there is a role for telemedicine beyond the COVID-19 pandemic and that it can be a particularly useful tool for certain patients – especially those who may have challenges coming on-site for an appointment. Giving patients flexibility and options by being able to see them both in-person and through telemedicine can improve access to care.”

Notably, two-thirds of respondents considered telemedicine to be a superior option when it came to treatment-related costs, such as travel and lost wages.

Co-lead author Erin F. Gillespie, MD, MSK Department of Radiation Oncology said, “An individual visit to the physician’s office can be costly—including transportation, parking, and time off from other activities. Telemedicine takes away most of this cost and inconvenience, and could therefore reduce the overall burden of engaging with the healthcare system. Also, the ability for family and friends to join the conversation from any location can be game-changing.”

The researchers found patient responses varied significantly between video conferencing versus audio. Patients who had telephone-only appointments were more likely to say they thought they would benefit more from an in-person visit.

“Telemedicine can be a resource to increase access to care, but only if patients have and can use these video capabilities,” said Dr. Shaverdian. “There is so much that you learn just by seeing a patient and using visual cues to guide a discussion. A voice-only encounter with a patient you’ve never met before is challenging.”

“Digital tools like telemedicine have the unfortunate potential consequence of paradoxically increasing disparities in access to care,” noted Dr. Gillespie. “But the counter to that is there will be some disadvantaged patients that would not have accessed the system at all, either due to technologic barriers or travel time, and now can connect at least by phone, which is an important and positive change.”

Source: National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Categories : CancerTags :

Many Breast Cancer Patients Don’t Discuss Cannabis Use with Docs

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Crystalweed Cannabis on Unsplash

About half of US adults with breast cancer use cannabis as an adjunct to cancer treatment for symptom and side effect management. However, most don’t discuss their use of cannabis with their physicians, according to a new study.

Pain, fatigue, nausea, and other difficulties often arise from cancer and its treatment, and some patients turn to cannabis for relief of their symptoms. However, many physicians feel that they lack the necessary knowledge to discuss cannabis with their patients. Such knowledge is especially important now that cannabis use is becoming more widespread.

In a study published in CANCER, researchers reported the results of an anonymous online survey to examine cannabis use among adults who were diagnosed with breast cancer within five years and were members of the Breastcancer.org and Healthline.com online health communities.

The findings revealed that:

  • Of the 612 participants, 42% reported using cannabis for relief of symptoms, including pain, insomnia, anxiety, stress, and nausea/vomiting. Among those who used cannabis, 75% reported that it was extremely or very helpful at relieving their symptoms.
  • Nearly half (49%) of participants who used cannabis believed that medical cannabis can be used to treat cancer itself; however, its effectiveness against cancer is unclear.
  • Among those using cannabis, 79% had used it during treatment, which included systemic therapies, radiation, and surgery.
  • Participants reported using a wide range of different cannabis products known to vary in quality and purity.
  • Half of participants sought information on medical cannabis, and websites and other patients were ranked as the most helpful sources of information. Physicians ranked low on the list.
  • Among those who sought information on cannabis use for medical purposes, most were unsatisfied with the information they received.
  • Most participants believed cannabis products to be safe and were unaware that the safety of many products is untested.

“Our study highlights an important opportunity for providers to initiate informed conversations about medical cannabis with their patients, as the evidence shows that many are using medical cannabis without our knowledge or guidance,” said lead author Marisa Weiss, MD, of Breastcancer.org and Lankenau Medical Center near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. “Not knowing whether or not our cancer patients are using cannabis is a major blind spot in our ability to provide optimal care, and as healthcare providers, we need to do a better job of initiating informed conversations about medical cannabis with our patients to make sure their symptoms and side effects are being adequately managed while minimising the risk of potential adverse effects, treatment interactions, or non-adherence to standard treatments due to misinformation about the use of medical cannabis to treat cancer.”

Dr Weiss added that patients should never use cannabis as an alternative to standard cancer treatment, and clinicians should inform patients about the safe and effective use of cannabis as an adjunct to their cancer treatment plan.

Source: Wiley

Categories : Cancer COVIDTags :

COVID Vaccines less Effective in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

On By ModernMedia
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

New research has found that patients undergoing active chemotherapy had a lower immune response to two doses of the COVID vaccine, although a third dose increased response.

“We wanted to make sure we understand the level of protection the COVID vaccines are offering our cancer patients, especially as restrictions were being eased and more contagious variants were starting to spread,” said Rachna Shroff, MD, MS, University of Arizona Health Sciences.

To find out, Dr Shroff and colleagues looked at 53 Cancer Center patients on immunosuppressive active cancer therapy, such as chemotherapy. They compared the immune response following the first and second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine with that of 50 healthy adults. 

After two vaccine doses, most of the cancer patients showed some immune response to the vaccine in that they had produced antibodies for SARS-CoV-2.

“We were pleasantly surprised,” said Deepta Bhattacharya, PhD, professor of immunobiology in the College of Medicine – Tucson. “We looked at antibodies, B cells and T cells, which make up the body’s defense system, and found the vaccine is likely to be at least partially protective for most people on chemotherapy.”

However, this  immune response was much lower than in healthy adults, and a few of the patients had no response to the COVID  vaccine. This translates to less protection against SARS-CoV-2, especially the now-dominant Delta variant.

Twenty patients returned for a third shot, which boosted the immune response for most. The overall group immune response after the third shot reached levels similar to those of people who were not on chemotherapy after two doses.

The results were published in Nature Medicine.

Source: University of Arizona Health Sciences

Categories : CancerTags :

SSRI Antidepressants Could be Used To Fight Cancer

On By ModernMedia
Natural killer (NK) cells target a cancel cell for destruction. Credit: NCI

Long used to treat depression, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) could help improve modern cancer treatments.

In mouse experiments, they slowed the growth of pancreatic and colon cancers, and when combined with immunotherapy, they even halted cancer growth long-term. In some cases the tumours disappeared completely. The researchers’ findings will now be tested in human clinical trials.

The neurotransmitter serotonin, known as the happiness molecule, has many other functions and is mostly found outside the brain, stored in blood platelets. Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), which are used to treat depression, increase serotonin levels in the brain but reduce serotonin in platelets.

Serotonin was already known to be involved  in carcinogenesis. Until now, however, the underlying mechanisms had remained obscure. Now, researchers at the University of Zurich (UZH) and University Hospital Zurich (USZ) have shown that SSRIs or other drugs that lower peripheral serotonin levels can also slow cancer growth in mice.

Pierre-Alain Clavien, Director, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Zurich, said: “Drugs that are already approved for clinical use as antidepressants could help improve treatment of hitherto incurable pancreatic and colorectal cancers.”

Although recent years have seen new, effective treatments such as targeted antibodies or immunotherapies, most patients with advanced-stage abdominal tumours such as colon or pancreatic cancer die within a few years of diagnosis. Tumour cells eventually become resistant to the drugs and are no longer recognised by the immune system. Now, the researchers have discovered the role serotonin plays in this tumour cell resistance mechanism.

Cancer cells use serotonin to boost production of an immunoinhibitory molecule, PD-L1, which binds to killer T cells, rendering them dysfunctional. The cancer cells thus escape destruction by the immune system. In mouse models, the researchers were able to show that SSRIs or peripheral serotonin synthesis inhibitors prevent this mechanism. “This class of antidepressants and other serotonin blockers cause immune cells to recognise and efficiently eliminate tumor cells again. This slowed the growth of colon and pancreatic cancers in the mice,” Clavien said.
PD-L1, via which serotonin exerts its effect, is also the target of modern immunotherapies, also called immune checkpoint inhibitors. The researchers then tested a dual treatment approach in mice: immunotherapy, which increases the activity of killer T cells, was combined with drugs that reduce peripheral serotonin. Cancer growth was suppressed in the animal models in the long term, and in some mice, the tumours disappeared completely.

“Our results provide hope for cancer patients, as the drugs used are already approved for clinical use. Testing such drug combinations on cancer patients in clinical trials can be fast-forwarded due to the known safety and efficacy of the drugs,” said Clavien.

Source: University of Zurich

Categories : CancerTags :

Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tech Tapped to Treat Cancer

On By ModernMedia
Source: National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine’s success against SARS-CoV-2 has prompted scientists to develop a vaccine for cancer, using Oxford’s viral vector vaccine technology.

When tested in mouse tumour models, the two-dose therapeutic cancer vaccine increased the numbers of anti-tumour T cells infiltrating the tumours and improved the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Compared to immunotherapy alone, combination with the vaccine resulted in a greater reduction in tumour size and improved survival.

The study, which was done by Professor Benoit Van den Eynde’s group at the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford in collaboration with co-authors Professor Adrian Hill and Dr Irina Redchenko at the University’s Jenner Institute, has been published in the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

Cancer immunotherapy has improved outcomes for some cancer patients. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy works by unleashing anti-tumour T cells to allow them to kill cancer cells. However, in the majority of cancer patients, anti-PD-1 therapy is still ineffective .

One reason for the poor efficacy of anti-PD-1 cancer therapy is that some patients have low levels of anti-tumour T cells. Oxford’s vaccine technology generates strong CD8+ T cell responses, which are necessary for strong anti-tumour effects.

The team developed a two-dose therapeutic cancer vaccine with different prime and boost viral vectors, one of which is the same as the vector in the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine. In order to create a vaccine treatment that specifically targets cancer cells, the vaccine was designed to target two MAGE-type proteins found on the surface of many types of cancer cells.

Preclinical experiments in mouse tumour models demonstrated that the cancer vaccine increased the levels of tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and enhanced the response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. The combined vaccine and anti-PD-1 treatment resulted in a greater reduction in tumour size and improved the survival of the mice compared to anti-PD-1 therapy alone.

Benoit Van den Eynde, Professor of Tumour Immunology at the University of Oxford, said: “We knew from our previous research that MAGE-type proteins act like red flags on the surface of cancer cells to attract immune cells that destroy tumours.

“MAGE proteins have an advantage over other cancer antigens as vaccine targets since they are present on a wide range of tumour types. This broadens the potential benefit of this approach to people with many different types of cancer.

“Importantly for target specificity, MAGE-type antigens are not present on the surface of normal tissues, which reduces the risk of side-effects caused by the immune system attacking healthy cells.”

Human trials in 80 patients with non-small cell lung cancer will be launched later this year.

Adrian Hill, Lakshmi Mittal and Family Professorship of Vaccinology and Director of the Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, said: “This new vaccine platform has the potential to revolutionise cancer treatment. The forthcoming trial in non-small cell lung cancer follows a Phase 2a trial of a similar cancer vaccine in prostate cancer undertaken by the University of Oxford that is showing promising results.

“Our cancer vaccines elicit strong CD8+ T cell responses that infiltrate tumours and show great potential in enhancing the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade therapy and improving outcomes for patients with cancer.”

Source: Oxford University

Categories : CancerTags :

Treating a Mutation Tames The ‘Red Devil’ Chemotherapy Drug

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Charles Parker from Pexels

Harmful side effects from the common chemotherapy drug doxorubicin could be caused by a single mutation, according to a study published in Cell Stem Cell.

The cardiotoxic effects of the chemotherapy drug doxorubicin – an infamous drug nicknamed the ‘Red Devil’ because of its bright red colour and side effects – could be prevented in patients with the mutation by treating them with retinoic acid, according to Paul Burridge, PhD, assistant professor of Pharmacology and senior author of the study.

“In the future patients could be given CD1530, or a similar drug, and this would reduce their chances of experiencing cardiotoxicity,” said Prof Burridge.

Doxorubicin is the most common chemotherapy drug and is mostly used in children and in breast cancer. However, patients receiving doxorubicin experience dose-dependent cardiotoxicity; up to 10% of childhood cancer survivors will develop heart failure in the 30 years after their treatment.

A previous study showed that people who experience cardiotoxicity from chemotherapy were more likely to have a genetic variation called a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in a gene called retinoic acid receptor gamma (RARG).

In this study, Dr Burridge and colleagues created patient-derived heart cells with this SNP and administered doxorubicin, finding that those cells indeed were more sensitive to the treatment. After correcting the mutation using genetic editing tools, the additional toxicity disappeared.

“This confirmed to us that RARG is important in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity sensitivity,” Prof Burridge said.

The researchers tried several drugs that could block the downstream effects of this mutation, finding that one drug, CD1530, made cardiomyocytes less sensitive to the chemotherapy. The drug activates retinoic acid receptors that are usually left inactivated in patients with the SNP, preventing activation of a cardio-protective pathway that is ill-suited for chemotherapy.

The investigators hope to test this drug in human patients, thanks to their use of human cells.

“Because all of our data was generated in human cells, there isn’t a need for a second basic research step,” Prof Burridge said. “We believe we will be able to begin the first stages of a clinical trial, testing the safety of RARG agonists and how effective they are in patients.”

Source: Northwestern University

Categories : Cancer Medical Research & TechnologyTags :

Plant Virus-based Treatment Protects Against Lung Tumours

On By ModernMedia
Image source: CDC/Unsplash

Using a virus that grows in black-eyed pea plants, nanoengineers developed a new treatment that could keep metastatic cancers at bay from the lungs. 

Not only did the treatment slow tumour growth in the lungs of mice with either metastatic breast cancer or melanoma, it also prevented or drastically minimised the spread of these cancers to the lungs of healthy mice that were challenged with the disease. The research was published in Advanced Science.

Researchers developed an experimental treatment that combats metastatic spread. This involves a plant virus called the cowpea mosaic virus, harmless to animals and humans, but which the body still registers as a foreign invader, thus triggering an immune response that could also boost the body’s cancer-fighting ability.

The idea is to use the plant virus to help the body’s immune system recognise and destroy cancer cells in the lungs. The virus itself is not infectious in our bodies, but it has all these danger signals that alarm immune cells to go into attack mode and search for a pathogen, said Nicole Steinmetz, professor of nanoengineering at the University of California San Diego.

To draw this immune response to lung tumours, Prof Steinmetz’s lab engineered nanoparticles made from the cowpea mosaic virus to target a protein in the lungs. The protein, called S100A9, is expressed and secreted by immune cells that help fight infection in the lungs. Overexpression of S100A9 has been observed to play a role in tumour growth and spread.

“For our immunotherapy to work in the setting of lung metastasis, we need to target our nanoparticles to the lung,” said Prof Steinmetz. “Therefore, we created these plant virus nanoparticles to home in on the lungs by making use of S100A9 as the target protein. Within the lung, the nanoparticles recruit immune cells so that the tumors don’t take.”

“Because these nanoparticles tend to localise in the lungs, they can change the tumor microenvironment there to become more adept at fighting off cancer — not just established tumors, but future tumors as well,” said Eric Chung, a bioengineering PhD student in Steinmetz’s lab who is one of the co-first authors on the paper.

To make the nanoparticles, the researchers infected black-eyed pea plants with cowpea mosaic virus, and harvested the virus in the form of ball-shaped nanoparticles. They then fixed S100A9-targeting molecules to the particles’ surfaces.

The researchers performed both prevention and treatment studies. In the prevention studies, they first injected the plant virus nanoparticles into the bloodstreams of healthy mice, and then later injected either triple negative breast cancer or melanoma cells into these mice. Treated mice showed a dramatic reduction in the cancers spreading to their lungs compared to untreated mice.

In the treatment studies, the researchers administered the nanoparticles to mice with metastatic tumours in their lungs. The treated mice exhibited smaller lung tumours and survived longer than untreated mice.

Prof Steinmetz envisions that the treatment could be useful after tumourectomy. “It wouldn’t be meant as an injection that’s given to everyone to prevent lung tumours. Rather, it would be given to patients who are at high risk of their tumors growing back as a metastatic disease, which often manifests in the lung. This would offer their lungs protection against cancer metastasis,” she said.

More detailed immunotoxicity and pharmacology studies are needed before this can progress to a treatment. Future studies will also explore combining this with standard cancer therapies such as chemotherapy.

Source: University of California – San Diego

Categories : Cancer General InterestTags :

Childhood Cancer Survivor Set to Break Barriers in Space

On By ModernMedia
Hayley Arcenaux, seated furthest left, is the Medical Officer for the Inspiration4 flight. She is a survivor of childhood cancer and works as a physician assistant at St Jude’s Children’s Hospital, for which the flight is raising funds and awareness.

The first chartered spaceflight into orbit, scheduled for launch on September 15, will have a crewmember who is both a childhood cancer survivor and physician assistant as part of the crew. 

The three-day long mission aboard a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft was chartered by entrepreneur Jared Isaacman. Dubbed Inspiration4, the flight is in fact also raising money and awareness for St Jude Children’s Hospital, which was given two of the four seats on the spacecraft. The funds raised for the hospital are believed to have exceeded the cost of the flight.

Isaacman offered the first seat to 29 year-old Hayley Arceneux, who works as a physician assistant at St Jude’s and will be the medical officer for the flight. She was also a patient at the very same hospital. At age 10, she was diagnosed with osteosarcoma, the most common primary paediatric bone malignancy. In addition to a dozen rounds of chemotherapy, she had a limb-sparing operation which replaced her knee and inserted a titanium reinforcing rod in her femur. This will make her the first person with a prosthetic in space. Such a medical history would have immediately disqualified her for astronaut selection with any of the government-run space agencies like NASA.

In an interview with The Cut, she described her work as a physician assistant at St Jude’s: “I work inpatient… with leukaemia and lymphoma patients specifically. The majority of them received their cancer diagnoses pretty recently, so a big part of  my role is helping to educate and support families through the beginning of treatment. I help them understand, What is cancer? What does the treatment process look like? What should I expect?

“We also manage the kids while they are in treatment. If they get an infection or if they get a fever, we take that really seriously. So I’ll manage their IV antibiotics or other treatment-related complications that can occur.. I check on patients, assess labs, order tests, update families on the results, order meds for outpatients. It is a lot of coordinating and educating. It’s hard, but it’s the greatest job in the world.”

St Jude’s held an auction for the other crew seat that Isaacman offered. The winning bidder declined the seat and gifted it to data engineer Christopher Sembroski. The final seat was won in an entrepreneurial competition by Dr Sian Proctor, a geologist and pilot who narrowly missed out on being chosen as a NASA astronaut. 

Speaking about the auction, Richard C. Shadyac Jr, president and chief executive of American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, which raised fund for St Jude’s, said: “The impact of the Inspiration4 mission has been immeasurable, serving as an incredible platform to educate and engage millions in the movement to find cures and deliver care for childhood cancer and other catastrophic diseases through accelerated research and treatment. The auction is a critical component of the overall campaign as it enables us to reach new audiences and supporters as we work to fulfill our mission.”

So far, $100 million has been raised for St Jude’s.

While in space, the crew will conduct experiments such as examining fluid shifts in zero gravity using ultrasound, as well as other medical experiments including measuring blood glucose levels — in order to help expand space travel to those with diabetes.

A documentary has been made of the crew’s training, and is available to stream on Netflix.

Categories : CancerTags :

Less than Half of Community Oncologists Use Biomarker Testing

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

A survey found that less than half of community oncologists surveyed indicated using biomarker testing to guide patient discussions, compared to 73% of academic clinicians.

Recent advances have substantially altered the management of lung cancer but, there is a concern these new methods, which include biomarker testing, will not be used equally throughout the health care system and worsen disparities that may already be entrenched.

To determine this, the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC), led by Leigh Boehmer, Pharm.D., chief medical officer, developed a US oncology clinician-facing survey instrument.

To help guide clinicians in the use of biomarker testing, the College of American Pathologists, the IASLC, and the Association for Molecular Pathology published the 2018 CAP/IASLC/AMP Molecular Testing Guidelines for Lung Cancer. Dr. Boehmer reported that of the 99 responses collected, only 40 percent indicated they were “very” or “extremely familiar” with the 2018 Guidelines.

The researchers found that clinicians were most confident in selecting appropriate tests to use, interpreting test results, and prognosticating based on test results, but less confident in determining when to order testing and coordination of care. This lack of communication was echoed in focus groups, Dr Boehmer reported.

Clinicians are most likely to order biomarker testing to make more accurate treatment decisions and inform patient discussions, but only 48% of community clinicians indicated that they use biomarker testing to guide patient discussions compared to 73% of academic clinicians.

Asked about preferences when making a final testing decision, 41% of clinicians prefer that they share responsibility with the patient while 52% prefer to make the final decision themselves. Only 6% prefer that the patient make the final decision. Focus groups suggested that clinicians perceive that patients rarely understand what testing entails and how it affects treatment options.

To make more informed decisions about biomarker testing, clinicians indicated that they need more information on financial resources, as well as education around both published guidelines and practical implications of clinical data. Sixty-seven percent of clinicians provide printed educational materials to their patients. When asked what resources their patients need most, 27% said their patients need handouts or educational resources, followed by psychosocial support (23%) and financial assistance (22%).

“This study identifies key areas of ongoing clinician need related to biomarker testing, including increased guideline familiarity, practical applications of guideline-concordant testing, and how to optimally help coordinate multidisciplinary care,” said Dr. Leigh Boehmer, Pharm.D. “Professional organisations and advocacy groups should focus on developing impactful education materials and tools for improving patient-clinician discussions about biomarker testing.”

Source: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer