Tag: breast cancer

Categories : Cancer HospitalsTags :

Key Factors in Hospitalisation after Breast Reconstruction Surgery

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Jafar Ahmed on Unsplash

Factors such as anaemia and anticoagulants have more impact on hospitalisation time after breast reconstruction than “common” risk factors according to a new study published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine.

The study investigated the impact of different factors on postoperative blood loss and drainage fluid volume, two factors which can lengthen hospitalisation time of patients after breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. The findings of the study allow for an improved risk assessment and planning of reconstructive breast surgery to offer patients personalised and improved treatment.

Partial or total mastectomy is often necessary in breast cancer surgery, and reconstructive breast surgery lessens the psychological stress on the patient. Fast wound healing after surgical breast reconstruction is crucial to not delay subsequent cancer treatments. Factors influencing the length of hospital stay (LOS) or wound healing are therefore particularly significant in cancer treatment. This study identified previously unrecognised risk factors.

Blood loss and drainage fluid volumes after breast reconstruction due to breast cancer were recorded, parameters which are closely linked to the healing process and LOS .Lower loss equals earlier patient discharge and early start of subsequent treatment. “We analysed factors that might affect blood loss and drainage fluid volumes after surgery – but can be identified before the surgery,” explained lead author Dr Tonatiuh Flores, plastic surgeon. “These factors included age, body mass index and smoking status – factors that are known to have a strong impact on the course of disease.” Additionally, haemoglobin levels and possible antithrombotic prophylaxis were reviewed – two parameters that are particularly significant in oncological treatment.

Surprising results emerged from the evaluation of a total of 257 breast reconstructions in 195 patients. Professor Konstantin Bergmeister, senior author of the study explained that “the classic risk factors did not significantly influence postoperative blood loss and drainage fluid output. Haemoglobin levels and anticoagulant concentration, however, did.” The analysis revealed a close relation between low haemoglobin values or anaemia and fluid loss after reconstructive breast surgery. Co-author Prof. Klaus Schroegendorfer, elaborated on this: “Especially breast cancer patients often show perioperative anaemia, caused by the frequently required neoadjuvant chemotherapy which can affect blood values, in particular haemoglobin.”

There were similar findings regarding low molecular heparin used in cancer patients as antithrombotic prophylaxis. Patients receiving heparin tended to have increased drainage fluid output after surgery, though the effect was not as strong as with perioperative anaemia.

The study authors recommend that, to cut LOS and continue the necessary cancer treatment after reconstructive breast surgery in cancer patients as early as possible, patients should preoperatively be screened for anaemia and administration of low molecular heparin should be adapted to the patients’ risk. In correlation to the results, follow-up treatment can be improved, patients can be discharged earlier and cancer treatment can be continued.

Source: Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences

Categories : CancerTags :

Cardamonin may Have Anticancer Properties

On By ModernMedia
Breast cancer cells. Image source: National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

The natural compound cardamonin present in the spice cardamom and other plants could have therapeutic potential for triple-negative breast cancer, according to a new study using human cancer cells. The findings also show that the compound targets a gene that helps cancer cells elude the immune system.

Around 10–15% of breast cancers are triple-negative, which means they lack receptors for oestrogen or progesterone and don’t make excess amounts of a protein called HER2. These tumours are difficult to treat because they don’t respond to the hormone-based therapies used for other types of breast cancer. They also tend to be more aggressive and have a higher mortality rate than other breast cancers.

“It has been challenging to develop a targeted therapy for triple-negative breast cancer that is safe and effective at the same time,” said Assistant Professor Patricia Mendonca, PhD, of Florida A&M University. “Because of this, there is a critical need to investigate medicinal plants as a new way to combat this cancer.”

The research was presented at the American Society for Investigative Pathology annual meeting.

“The fact that cardamonin has been used for centuries as a spice and, more recently, as a supplement shows that its intake is safe and may bring health benefits,” said A/Prof Mendonca. “Our research shows that cardamonin holds potential for improving cancer therapy without as many side effects as other chemotherapeutic agents.”

For the new study, the researchers investigated how cardamonin affected the expression of the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) gene, which is found in tumour cells. PD-L1 is overexpressed during breast cancer progression and plays a critical role in helping breast cancer cells evade the body’s immune system.

The researchers used two genetically different triple-negative breast cancer cell lines – one derived from women with African American ancestry and the other from women of European origin (Caucasian). They found that cardamonin treatment caused a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability in both cell lines. It also reduced PD-L1 expression in the Caucasian cell line but not the African American cell line, indicating that cells from different races may respond differently to cardamonin because of genetic variations among races. 

“This is the first study to describe cardamonin’s inhibitory effect on the expression of PD-L1, which is relevant for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer,” said Mendonca. “These findings add support to other research that has shown differences in the tumour microenvironment between African and non-African Americans.”

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Cancer Expert OpinionTags :

To Properly Use AI to Analyse Breast Cancers, Look to Past Mistakes

On By ModernMedia
Source: National Cancer Institute

Doctors writing in an editorial in JAMA Health Forum caution that while using AI to analyse breast cancer tumours has the potential to improve healthcare efficiency and outcomes, similar technological leaps have previously led to higher rates of false-positive tests and over-treatment.

The editorial wasco-written by Joann G. Elmore, MD, MPH, professor of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and Christoph I. Lee, MD, MS, MBA, a professor of radiology at the University of Washington School of Medicine.

“Without a more robust approach to the evaluation and implementation of AI, given the unabated adoption of emergent technology in clinical practice, we are failing to learn from our past mistakes in mammography,” the authors wrote.

One of those “past mistakes in mammography,” the authors said, was adjunct computer-aided detection (CAD) tools, which grew rapidly in popularity in the field of breast cancer screening starting more than two decades ago. CAD was approved by the FDA in 1998, and by 2016 more than 92% of U.S. imaging facilities were using the technology to interpret mammograms and hunt for tumours. However, CAD did not improve mammography accuracy., according to the evidence. “CAD tools are associated with increased false positive rates, leading to overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and unnecessary diagnostic testing,” the authors wrote. The US Medicare system stopped paying for CAD in 2018, but by then the tools had run up more than $400 million a year in wasted health costs.

“The premature adoption of CAD is a premonitory symptom of the wholehearted embrace of emergent technologies prior to fully understanding their impact on patient outcomes,” Drs Elmore and Lee wrote. “As AI algorithms are increasingly receiving FDA clearance and becoming commercially available with ROC curves similar to what we observed prior to CAD clearance and adoption, how can we prevent history from repeating itself?”

The doctors suggest a number of safeguards to avoid “repeating past mistakes” such as tying reimbursement to proven efficacy.

Source: UCLA Health

Categories : CancerTags :

New Recommendations for Earlier Breast Cancer MRI Screening

On By ModernMedia
This screening MRI detected a very small cancer (circled) in the patient’s breast.
Credit: Dr. Kathyrn Lowry

Annual MRI screenings starting at ages 30 to 35 may slash breast-cancer mortality by more than 50% among women with genetic changes in three genes, according to a study published in JAMA Oncology.

The pathogenic variants are in the ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 genes – which collectively are as prevalent as the much-reported BRCA1/2 gene mutations. The study authors state that their findings support earlier MRI screening in these women.

“Screening guidelines have been difficult to develop for these women because there haven’t been clinical trials to inform when to start and how to screen,” said lead author Dr Kathryn Lowry.

The work was a collaboration of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET), the Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium, and the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

To arrive at their model, the researchers input age-specific risk estimates from CARRIERS involving some 64 000 women and recent published data for screening performance.

“For women with pathogenic variants in these genes, our modeling analysis predicted a lifetime risk of developing breast cancer at 21% to 40%, depending on the variant,” Dr Lowry said. “We project that starting annual MRI screening at age 30 to 35, with annual mammography starting at age 40, will reduce cancer mortality for these populations of women by more than 50%.”

The simulations compared the combined performance of mammography and MRI against mammography alone, and projected that annual MRI conferred significant additional benefit to these populations.

“We also found that starting mammograms earlier than age 40 did not have a meaningful benefit but increased false-positive screens,” Dr Lowry added.

Results from CISNET models have informed past guidelines, including the 2009 and 2016 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for breast cancer screening in average-risk women.

“Modelling is a powerful tool to synthesise and extend clinical trial and national cohort data to estimate the benefits and harms of different cancer control strategies at population levels,” said senior author Dr Jeanne Mandelblatt.

The study projected about four false-positive screening results and one to two benign biopsies per woman over a 40-year screening span, the authors noted.

To get any benefit from genetic susceptibility-based screening guidelines, a woman would have to know beforehand that she carries the gene, yet most often a genetic test panel is done after a positive cancer result – too late for any benefit.

“People understand very well the value of testing for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2, the most common breast cancer predisposition genes. These results show that testing other genes, like ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2, can also lead to improved outcomes,” said senior author Dr Mark Robson.

The researchers hope their analysis will aid the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Cancer Society and other organizations that issue guidance for medical oncologists and radiologists.

“Overall what we’re proposing is slightly earlier screening than what the current guidelines suggest for some women with these variants,” said senior author Professor Allison Kurian. “For example, current NCCN guidelines recommend starting at age 30 for women with PALB2, and at 40 for ATM and CHEK2. Our results suggest that starting MRI at age 30 to 35 appears beneficial for women with any of the three variants.”

Source: University of Washington

Categories : CancerTags :

Researchers Halt Aspirin Trial to Prevent Breast Cancer Recurrence

On By ModernMedia
Source: National Cancer Institute

A large randomised trial was halted after preliminary analysis found that taking aspirin after treatment for breast cancer did not reduce the risk of disease recurrence.

Laboratory studies had previously shown that aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduced breast cancer growth and invasion. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) display anticancer activity through the inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme, triggering processes such as apoptosis, a reduction in proliferation and inhibition of carcinogenesis.  Several observational studies have shown a reduced risk of breast cancer mortality among regular aspirin users. 

There was a 25% higher risk of invasive recurrence in patients who took aspirin for a median of 18 months, but not statistically different from placebo (P = 0.1258). The aspirin group had an excess of all disease-related events, including death, local and distant recurrence/progression, and new primary tumours.

The results are in line with similar trials that ended while the Aspirin after Breast Cancer (ABC) trial was ongoing, Wendy Y. Chen, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, said during a presentation at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Plenary Series.

“In this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial, there was no benefit of aspirin 300 milligrams daily in terms of breast cancer invasive disease-free survival,” reported Dr Chen. “Although follow-up was short, the futility bound was clearly crossed. We had reached 50% of the events, and there was a numerically higher number of events in the aspirin arm. Therefore, it was unlikely that even with further follow-up there wouldn’t be any benefit associated with aspirin.”

“Although inflammation may still play a key role in cancer, it’s important to remember that aspirin may have different effects in other cancers, such as colon, or in different settings, such as primary versus secondary prevention,” she added.

Though the trial was well designed, enrolled the right population and with adequate dosing. the trial was stopped early for futility, commented Angela DeMichele, MD, of the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

“The direction and magnitude [of the difference in events] highly preclude the possibility that there would have been a benefit with more follow-up,” said Dr DeMichele. “Although it was not statistically significant, we cannot rule out the possibility of a potential increase in breast cancer recurrence from the use of aspirin.”

“For patients and providers at this time, aspirin should not be used simply to prevent breast cancer recurrence,” she continued. “For those situations in which there are other options, decisions about aspirin use for other indications should definitely include an individualised risk/benefit discussion between physician and patient.”

The results underscore the need for prospective, randomised clinical trials to validate the effects of interventions from observational studies, she concluded.

The ABC trial involved patients under 70 with HER2-negative, high-risk breast cancer. The study randomised 3021 participants to 300 mg of aspirin daily or matching placebo for 5 years, with the primary endpoint being invasive disease-free survival. 

Dr Chen further noted that three clinical trials of aspirin or NSAID treatment ended while the ABC trial was ongoing. The Canadian-led MA.27 trial of an aromatase inhibitor plus celecoxib ended due to toxicity in the celecoxib arm. The randomised REACT trial of celecoxib in HER2-negative breast cancer showed no difference in disease-free survival after more than 6 years of follow-up.

The ASPREE trial tested low-dose aspirin on all-cause mortality in healthy older patients, and results showed a trend to increased all-cause mortality and significantly higher cancer mortality in the aspirin arm. 
During the post-presentation discussion, an audience member asked whether the results definitively ruled out a late benefit of aspirin, given that most patients had HR-positive disease wherein late relapse is not uncommon.

“It’s always frustrating when a study is closed early, and it was done in this case after we had reached 50% of the expected benefits,” said Chen. “There was an increase [in clinical events]. Not a statistically significant increase, but it was bordering on statistical significance. In order for aspirin to have a benefit, it would mean that in the second half, there would need to be a significantly decreased risk. It would basically need to flip and that would be biologically difficult to imagine.”

“I think it’s fair to say that this study doesn’t say definitively that there’s harm, but as for the likelihood of a benefit of aspirin, that would be extremely unlikely,” she said.

Source: MedPage Today

Categories : CancerTags :

Metformin Ineffective in Most Breast Cancers

On By ModernMedia
Breast cancer cells. Image source: National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

Researchers have found that the diabetes drug metformin, once hoped to hold enormous promise in treating breast cancer, does not prevent or stop the spread of the most common forms of the disease but may still have potential in HER2-positive breast cancer.

The randomised, double-blind trial enrolled 3600 patients who received two pills a day of either placebo or metformin. Overall, researchers found the addition of metformin to standard breast cancer treatments did not improve outcomes in the two most common types of breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive or negative.

“The results tell us that metformin is not effective against the most common types of breast cancer and any off-label use of this drug for the treatment of these common types of breast cancer should be stopped,” said Pamela Goodwin, a professor in the department of medicine at the University of Toronto’s Temerty Faculty of Medicine.

Prof Goodwin presented the findings at the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

While metformin was found not to be effective in treating the most common forms of breast cancer, there was evidence that use of metformin for five years might lead to a reduction in deaths from HER2-positive breast cancer, a less aggressive subtype which makes up about 20% of all breast cancers.

“Metformin is not beneficial for use in most common breast cancers, but in the cases of HER2 positive breast cancer, our findings suggest it may be beneficial,” said Prof Goodwin. “These results need to be replicated in future research before metformin is used as a breast cancer treatment, however, it could provide an additional treatment option for HER2-positive breast cancer,” she added

Previous studies suggested metformin may also reduce the risk of development and increase survival of some cancers, including breast cancer.

Metformin was theorised to slow breast cancer growth by improving patient metabolism, notably insulin levels, leading to reduced cancer cell growth, or that it might impact cancer cells directly.

Next steps would be to prospectively test the impact of metformin in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in a randomised clinical trial. 

Source: University of Toronto

Categories : CancerTags :

Anti-diabetes Drug under Development May Also Treat Breast Cancer

On By ModernMedia
Source: NCI

A new study has shown that a small molecule inhibitor drug, with the unwieldy designation of PF05175157, originally developed to treat diabetes by Pfizer, may help in the treatment of breast cancer by blocking a key enzyme. 

The findings from the Yale Cancer Center-led study were reported at the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in San Antonio, Texas.

“Our research shows the preclinical, anti-cancer activity using PF05175157 may lead us to bring this drug back into the clinic to help treat patients with breast cancer,” said lead study author Julia Foldi, MD, PhD, a clinical fellow at Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital. “More studies are needed, but our initial data looks very promising.”

Cancer cells are characterised by altered metabolism. In this study, the Yale team identified new metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer cells that are based on a loss of enzyme diversity. They found that an enzyme called acetyl-CoA-carboxylase-1 (ACC1), is critical for the survival of breast cancer cells. The ACC1 enzyme is the key initial step in fatty acid synthesis. Fatty acids are building blocks of the various types of lipids and fat that are the critical ingredients of cell membranes and play an important role in energy generation in cells. The team’s analysis demonstrated that blocking ACC1 using PF05175157 can inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells grown in mice and also in patient-derived cancer models.

“We are currently testing this drug in combination with other approved breast cancer drugs to see if it could improve their activity, with the hope to bring the most promising combinations to the clinic to help patients with breast cancer,” added Lajos Pusztai, MD, DPhil, Professor of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Director of Breast Cancer Translational Research at Yale Cancer Center, and senior author of the study.

Source: Yale Cancer Center

Categories : Cancer Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

After a Pregnancy, Natural Killer Cells Suppress Tumours

On By ModernMedia
Source: Anna Hecker on Unsplash

After a pregnancy, breast cells call in Natural Killer T (NKT) cells as reinforcements to prevent tumours from arising, according to a study published in Cell Reports. This finding from the lab of Associate Professor Camila dos Santos at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) illuminates a new way in which pregnancy reduces the risk of breast cancer.

Two lines of defence exist in the immune system: the innate response, which involves immune cells that attack any foreign molecule they encounter, and the adaptive response, which consists of immune cells that respond specifically to calls for help. NKT cells are a unique subset of cells that are present throughout the body which can participate in both responses. 

CSHL graduate student Amritha Varshini Hanasoge Somasundara said that after a pregnancy: “There is an increase in this specific [NKT] cell type, and only in the mammary gland. We don’t see the expansion everywhere else in the body, even though NKT cells are present everywhere else in the body.”

The team sought to uncover the reason behind the larger number of NKT cells were doing in the breast tissue. Hanasoge discovered that in mice, breast epithelial cells, which line lactation ducts, produce a specific protein called CD1d after pregnancy. If the cells did not present CD1d, no increase in NKT cells was seen in the tissue; the epithelial cells became cancerous and grew into tumours. Hanasoge and dos Santos think that CD1d molecules are calling in NKT cells to monitor the epithelial cells in the breast tissue after pregnancy. If they become cancerous, the NKT cells can quickly kill them to prevent tumour growth.

The team’s findings establish a novel link between pregnancy and the immune system in preventing breast cancer. They want to know how these findings can be translated into humans and what other factors may influence an abundance of NKT cells in breast tissue, such as aging and menopause, which are both associated with increased breast cancer risk.

Discussing the results, Associate Professor dos Santos said: “One of the hypotheses that we are working on now is: do pregnancies later on in life bring in the same expansion of the same subtypes of immune cells as pregnancies that took place early in life?”

Source: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Categories : CancerTags :

Older Antipsychotic Drugs Linked to Breast Cancer

On By ModernMedia

Source: National Cancer Institute

A number of commonly prescribed older antipsychotic drugs, and some newer ones, are associated with a significant increase in risk of breast cancer, according to a new study.  The findings are published online in the Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Previous research uncovered the link between antipsychotic drug use, prescribed for a wide array of mental health problems, and breast cancer risk. This study compared newer antipsychotics to older drugs, and examined how the drugs affect prolactin levels, which have been associated with breast cancer. However, many antipsychotics elevate prolactin levels and can produce side effects such as menstrual cycle irregularities, abnormal breast milk production and abnormal breast tissue growth.

“Many women with psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder will take antipsychotics for decades, and they are essential to keeping symptoms in check,” said first author Tahir Rahman, MD. “But both older antipsychotic medicines and some newer drugs raise levels of prolactin and increase the risk of breast cancer, which is concerning. Our study confirms findings from a smaller European study that advised women and their doctors to first try drugs that don’t affect prolactin levels. We agree with that advice and believe psychiatrists should start to monitor prolactin levels in their patients taking antipsychotics.”

Antipsychotic drugs were classified into three categories, based on their established effects on prolactin. Category 1 included drugs associated with high prolactin levels, such as haloperidol, paliperidone and risperidone. Category 2 had mid-range effects and included iloperidone, lurasidone and olanzapine. Category 3 had low-effect drugs such as aripiprazole, asenapine, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, clozapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone.

Comparing the three drug categories to anticonvulsant drugs and lithium, the relative risk of breast cancer was 62% higher for women who took Category 1 drugs and 54% higher for those taking Category 2 drugs, whereas Category 3 antipsychotics were not associated with any increase in breast cancer risk.

“Certain drugs are known to elevate prolactin, and the women taking those drugs were more likely to have breast cancer,” Dr Rahman said. “But we didn’t detect any increased risk in women taking antipsychotics that don’t raise prolactin levels.”

In mouse models, prolactin can help weaken systems keeping precancerous lesions from becoming breast cancer. In humans, prolactin levels tend to be lower in women who have had more children at a younger age than in women who have fewer children or wait until they are older to do so.

In this study using data collected from 2012 through 2016, the research team performed a retrospective, observational study of breast cancer risk in women ages 18 through 64 who took antipsychotics.

The researchers identified which patients were treated for breast cancer during a 12-month period and matched that information to patients taking antipsychotic drugs. Of the 540 737 women in the database taking antipsychotics, only 914 were identified as having breast cancer – a significant number of whom were taking drugs known to increase prolactin.

“Antipsychotic medications can be lifesaving for patients who have psychotic episodes where they experience symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions,” Dr Rahman said. “In recent years, the drugs have been approved to treat other conditions, too, including depression and bipolar disorder. As those high-prolactin agents are used more widely, the number at risk could increase. We’ve been advising against using these high-prolactin agents in women who already have breast cancer, but we’d like to investigate whether keeping prolactin levels lower even might prevent some of these cancers.”

In another recent study, the antipsychotic drug aripiprazole did not increase prolactin levels in women and that a few women who began the study with high prolactin levels experienced decreases in prolactin levels after 12 weeks of treatment.

Those findings, combined with preclinical evidence of the anticancer effects of some antipsychotics, have inspired Dr Rahman and colleagues to propose repurposing some antipsychotic drugs in the fight against breast cancer.

“We don’t want to alarm patients taking antipsychotic drugs for life-threatening mental health problems, but we also think it is time for doctors to track prolactin levels and vigilantly monitor their patients who are being treated with antipsychotics,” Dr Rahman said.

Source: Washington University School of Medicine

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

Tamoxifen Found to be Ineffective in Fungal Meningitis Trial

On By ModernMedia
Photomicrograph of a sample extracted from a lesion that revealed the presence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Credit: CDC

In a disappointing outcome, a clinical trial has shown that tamoxifen, a promising candidate to improve survival for a deadly form of fungal meningitis, is ineffective. The trial was conducted by University of Oxford researchers and published in eLife.

The study finds that adding tamoxifen, a breast cancer drug, to standard antifungal treatment was no faster in clearing fungal infection from the spinal fluid of people with meningitis. More patients who received tamoxifen had evidence of heart conduction disturbances, rates of severe side effects were similar.

Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of death in people with HIV, but also affects those without HIV, regardless of whether they are immunocompromised. Most infections are caused by a fungus called Cryptococcus neoformans (C. neoformans) and occur in low-income tropical settings. The gold-standard treatment is a combination of three drugs: flucytosine and amphotericin B initially, followed by fluconazole. Yet, even on this gold-standard therapy, a third of patients die within 10 weeks of being diagnosed. Moreover, the drug flucytosine is severely restricted by availability and cost, meaning it is rarely used where the disease burden is highest.

Co-first author Nguyen Thi Thuy Ngan, Clinician at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU): ‘Tamoxifen has shown antifungal activity against various yeasts in the lab; we subsequently showed that it acts synergistically with amphotericin against two-thirds of clinical Cryptococcus isolates from our archive. As a well-understood, off-patent, cheap and widely available medicine, it was a promising candidate for treating cryptococcal meningitis.’

Co-first author Nhat Thanh Hoang Le, Biostatistician at OUCRU, added: ‘We designed a randomised trial to determine whether using these drugs in combination could improve the speed of clearance of Cryptococcus from patients with meningitis with and without HIV.’

The trial involved 50 patients, 40 with HIV. Of the patients, 24 were assigned to receive a standard anti-fungal treatment of amphotericin B and fluconazole plus tamoxifen, and 26 received the standard anti-fungal treatment only. Researchers measured the Early Fungicidal Activity (EFA) for both groups – how quickly C. neoformans amounts declined in a patient’s spinal fluid in the two weeks following treatment.

Based on their prior work, the team were hoping for better EFA for patients receiving tamoxifen, but there was no detectable difference in EFA.

The only observed difference was increased heart toxicity in the tamoxifen group. Lab studies had shown that a tamoxifen dose five to 10 times higher than that used routinely in breast cancer would be needed to have an antifungal effect. However, high doses of tamoxifen cause QT prolongation, which can cause cardiac arrest. While there was one sudden death in the tamoxifen group in this study, this occurred after the period of tamoxifen administration and it was not associated with an abnormal heart rhythm.

Senior author Professor Jeremy Day, Professor of Infectious Diseases, Oxford University, said: “Despite its apparent anti-cryptococcal effect and synergy with other drugs, tamoxifen does not increase the rate of clearance of yeast from spinal fluid in people with meningitis and is unlikely to result in clinical benefit.

“Our results show the importance of small-scale trials such as this for rapidly evaluating repurposable drugs and preventing the time and cost of a larger clinical study that is likely to fail. However, sadly this does mean that we urgently still need new, specific anti-cryptococcal drugs to be developed, and we also need to ensure that existing, available treatments are made accessible and affordable.”

Source: Oxford University