Tag: anti-inflammatories

Antibiotics, Vaccinations and Anti-inflammatories Linked to Reduced Risk of Dementia

Photo by Mufid Majnun on Unsplash

Antibiotics, antivirals, vaccinations and anti-inflammatory medication are associated with reduced risk of dementia, according to new research that looked at health data from over 130 million individuals.

The study, led by researchers from the universities of Cambridge and Exeter, identified several drugs already licensed and in use that have the potential to be repurposed to treat dementia.

Dementia is a leading cause of death in the UK and can lead to profound distress in the individual and among those caring for them. It has been estimated to have a worldwide economic cost in excess of US$1 trillion dollars.

Despite intensive efforts, progress in identifying drugs that can slow or even prevent dementia has been disappointing. Until recently, dementia drugs were effective only for symptoms and have a modest effect. Recently, lecanemab and donanemab have been shown to reduce the build-up in the brain of amyloid plaques – a key characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease – and to slow down progression of the disease, but the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) concluded that the benefits were insufficient to justify approval for use within the NHS.

Scientists are increasingly turning to existing drugs to see if they may be repurposed to treat dementia. As the safety profile of these drugs is already known, the move to clinical trials can be accelerated significantly.  

Dr Ben Underwood, from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Cambridge and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, said: “We urgently need new treatments to slow the progress of dementia, if not to prevent it. If we can find drugs that are already licensed for other conditions, then we can get them into trials and – crucially – may be able to make them available to patients much, much faster than we could do for an entirely new drug. The fact they are already available is likely to reduce cost and therefore make them more likely to be approved for use in the NHS.”

In a study published today in Alzheimer’s and Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, Dr Underwood, together with Dr Ilianna Lourida from the University of Exeter, led a systematic review of existing scientific literature to look for evidence of prescription drugs that altered the risk of dementia. Systematic reviews allow researchers to pool several studies where evidence may be weak, or even contradictory, to arrive at more robust conclusions.

In total, the team examined 14 studies that used large clinical datasets and medical records, capturing data from more than 130 million individuals and 1 million dementia cases. Although they found a lack of consistency between studies in identifying individual drugs that affect the risk of dementia, they identified several drug classes associated with altered risk.

One unexpected finding was an association between antibiotics, antivirals and vaccines, and a reduced risk of dementia. This finding supports the hypothesis that common dementias may be triggered by viral or bacterial infections, and supports recent interest in vaccines, such as the BCG vaccine for tuberculosis, and decreased risk of dementia.

Anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen were also found to be associated with reduced risk. Inflammation is increasingly being seen to be a significant contributor to a wide range of diseases, and its role in dementia is supported by the fact that some genes that increase the risk of dementia are part of inflammatory pathways.

The team found conflicting evidence for several classes of drugs, with some blood pressure medications and anti-depressants and, to a lesser extent, diabetes medication associated with a decreased risk of dementia and others associated with increased risk.

Dr Ilianna Lourida from the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, said: “Because a particular drug is associated with an altered risk of dementia, it doesn’t necessarily mean that it causes or indeed helps in dementia. We know that diabetes increases your risk of dementia, for example, so anyone on medication to manage their glucose levels would naturally also be at a higher risk of dementia – but that doesn’t mean the drug increases your risk.

“It’s important to remember that all drugs have benefits and risks. You should never change your medicine without discussing this first with your doctor, and you should speak to them if you have any concerns.”

The conflicting evidence may also reflect differences in how particular studies were conducted and how data was collected, as well as the fact that different medications even within the same class often target different biological mechanisms.

The UK government is supporting the development of an Alzheimer’s trial platform to evaluate drugs rapidly and efficiently, including repurposed drugs currently used for other conditions.

“Pooling these massive health data sets provides one source of evidence which we can use to help us focus on which drugs we should try first,” said Dr Underwood. “We’re hopeful this will mean we can find some much-needed new treatments for dementia and speed up the process of getting them to patients.”

Republished under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Reference
Underwood, BU & Lourida, I et al. Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed drugs and dementia risk: A systematic review. Alz & Dem; 21 Jan 2025; DOI: 10.1002/trc2.70037

Source: University of Cambridge

Patients with Osteoarthritis are Often Prescribed NSAIDs Despite Contraindications

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya

A new study published in the journal Osteoarthritis and Cartilage has found that people with newly diagnosed osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip with contraindications to or precautions for NSAIDs still continue to be prescribed these drugs. Additionally they had higher use of opioids and slightly lower physical therapy (PT) use within the first year of OA diagnosis, both of which are not consistent with treatment guidelines for OA.

“We found individuals with contraindications to NSAIDs were still commonly prescribed them, placing them at risk for NSAID-related adverse events,” explains corresponding author Tuhina Neogi, MD, PhD, the Alan S. Cohen Professor of Rheumatology and professor of medicine at the school. “Additionally, they were not more likely to receive safer alternatives like PT despite its widespread recommendation as first-line intervention.”

The researchers used population-based register data to identify adults residing in Sweden (between 2004-13) without a previous knee or hip OA diagnosis. Among this group, between 2014-18, they identified people with knee or hip OA diagnosis and presence of contraindications to or precautions for oral NSAIDs at the time of OA diagnosis. They then estimated the risk of: 1) regular oral NSAID use; 2) regular opioid use; 3) PT during the first year after diagnosis among those with versus without contraindications or precautions.

Despite having contraindications to NSAIDs, 21% of those in the study were regular users of NSAIDs within the first year of their OA diagnosis. Similarly, 21% of those with precautions for using NSAIDs were also regular users. They also found a higher proportion of persons with contraindications were regular users of opioids than those without a contraindication or precaution, while a slightly lower proportion received PT.

Neogi stresses that more options for effective and safe management of OA symptoms are urgently needed, and greater work is required in narrowing and ultimately closing the evidence-knowledge-practice gap.

Source: Boston University

Trial of Minocycline for Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration Flops

Retina showing reticular pseudodrusen. Although they can infrequently appear in individuals with no other apparent pathology, their highest rates of occurrence are in association with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), for which they hold clinical significance by being highly correlated with end-stage disease sub-types, choroidal neovascularisation and geographic atrophy. Credit: National Eye Institute

The drug minocycline, an antibiotic that also decreases inflammation, failed to slow vision loss or expansion of geographic atrophy in people with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), according to a phase II clinical study at the National Eye Institute (NEI), part of the National Institutes of Health.

Dry AMD affects the macula, the part of the retina that allows for clear central vision. In people with dry AMD, patches of photoreceptors and their nearby support cells begin to die off, leaving regions known as geographic atrophy. Over time, these regions expand, causing people to lose more and more of their central vision.

Microglia, immune cells that help maintain tissue and clear up debris, are present at higher levels around damaged retinal regions in people with dry AMD than in people without AMD. Scientists have suggested that inflammation – and particularly microglia – may be driving the expansion of geographic atrophy regions.

This study, led by Tiarnan Keenan, MD, PhD, a Stadtman Tenure-Track Investigator at the NEI’s Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, tested whether inhibiting microglia with minocycline might help slow geographic atrophy expansion and its corresponding vision loss.

The trial enrolled 37 participants at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, and at the Bristol Eye Hospital, United Kingdom.

After a nine-month period where the researchers tracked each participant’s rate of geographic atrophy expansion, the participants took twice-daily doses of minocycline for two years.

The researchers compared each participant’s rate of geographic atrophy expansion while taking minocycline to their baseline rate, and found there was no difference in geographic atrophy expansion rate or vision loss with minocycline.

Previous studies have shown that minocycline can help reduce inflammation and microglial activity in the eye, including the retina.

The drug has shown beneficial effects for conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, but has not previously been tested for dry AMD.

Source: NIH/National Eye Institute

New Approach May Take the Guesswork out of Selecting Treatments for RA

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-feeling-pain-in-the-knee-11349880/

New research reported in the journal Nature could lead to new targeted treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The findings showed that guesswork could be taken out of selecting treatments for each patient, and this might one day also be extended to other autoimmune conditions.

The study was led by University of Colorado School of Medicine faculty members Fan Zhang, PhD, and Anna Helena Jonsson, MD, PhD. The Accelerating Medicines Partnership: Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (AMP: RA/SLE) Network collected inflamed tissue from 70 patients with RA from across the country and the United Kingdom. Jonsson supervised the team of scientists who processed these samples for analysis, and Zhang led the computation analysis of the data. These efforts yielded a cell atlas encompassing more than 300 000 cells from synovial tissue. Further analysis revealed that there are six different subgroups of RA based on their cellular makeup.

“We hope the data will help us discover new treatment targets,” says Jonsson, assistant professor of rheumatology. “We wanted to make it public so that researchers across the country and across the world can continue working on new treatment ideas for rheumatoid arthritis going forward.”

No more guess-and-check

Jonsson, a practicing rheumatologist as well as a researcher, knows that RA patients respond differently to different treatments. Until now, she says, rheumatologists used a “guess and check” method to find a treatment that works for an individual patient.

With the new data and powerful computational classification methods developed by Zhang and the computational analysis team, the researchers were able to quantitatively classify RA types into what they call ‘cell-type abundance phenotypes’, or CTAPs. Developed methods, together with the new cell atlas, can start to identify which patients will respond to which treatments.

“Even when you classify rheumatoid arthritis inflammation using these simple markers – T cell markers, B cells, macrophages and other myeloid cells, fibroblasts, endothelial cells – what we found is that each of those categories is associated with very specific kinds of pathogenic cell types we’ve already discovered,” Jonsson says. “Previous rheumatoid arthritis research found that T cell populations called peripheral helper T cells are relevant in rheumatoid arthritis, as are B cells called antibody-producing B cells, and other specific cell types. What we found is that they’re usually not found all together.

“For example, the peripheral helper cells are found with the B cells in only one category of RA, and the pathogenic macrophage populations tend to exist in a different category. Because of this, we can start asking questions about how these specific partners work together.”

Source: University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Steroids after Severe COVID Reduces One-year Mortality by 51%

Photo by Stephen Andrews on Unsplash

Researchers have shown that severe inflammation during hospitalisation for COVID increases post-recovery mortality risk by 61% – but this risk is reduced again by 51% if anti-inflammatory steroids are prescribed upon discharge. We need to think of COVID as a potentially chronic disease that requires long-term management, argue the authors, whose results are published in Frontiers in Medicine.

Evidence continues to gather that ‘long COVID’, that is, continued negative health impacts months after apparent recovery from severe COVID, is an important risk for some patients. For example, researchers showed last December that hospitalised patients who seemingly recovered from severe COVID run more than double the risk of dying within the next year, compared to those with only mild COVID or who never had COVID.

Now, the same research team shows that among patients hospitalised for COVID who seemingly recovered, severe systemic inflammation during their hospitalisation is a risk factor for death within one year.

“Here we show that the stronger the inflammation during the initial hospitalisation, the greater the probability that the patient will die within 12 months after seemingly ‘recovering’ from COVID.”

Professor Arch G Mainous III

“COVID is known to create inflammation, particularly during the first, acute episode. Our study is the first to examine the relationship between inflammation during hospitalisation for COVID and mortality after the patient has ‘recovered’,” said first author Professor Arch G Mainous III at the University of Florida Gainesville.

“Here we show that the stronger the inflammation during the initial hospitalisation, the greater the probability that the patient will die within 12 months after seemingly ‘recovering’ from COVID.”

Prof Mainous and colleagues analysed electronic health records of 1207 adults hospitalised with COVID in 2020 or 2021 within the University of Florida health system, with at least a one year follow-up after discharge. As a proxy for the severity of systemic inflammation during hospitalisation, they used a common and validated measure: C-reactive protein (CRP), secreted by the liver in response to a signal by active immune cells.

Widespread inflammation in the body

As expected, the blood concentration of CRP during hospitalisation was strongly correlated with the severity of COVID: 59.4mg/L for patients not needing supplemental oxygen, 126.9 mg/L for those who needed extra oxygen without mechanical ventilation, and 201.2 mg/L for the most severe cases, who required ventilation through a ventilator or through ECMO.

After correcting for risk factors, patients with the highest CRP concentration measured their during their hospital stay had a 61% greater risk of all-cause mortality within one year of discharge than patients with the lowest CRP concentration.

Prof Mainous said: “Many infectious diseases are accompanied by an increase in inflammation. Most times the inflammation is focused or specific to where the infection is. COVID is different because it creates inflammation in many places besides the airways, for example in the heart, brain, and kidneys. High degrees of inflammation can lead to tissue damage.”

Importantly, the authors showed that the increased all-cause mortality risk associated with severe inflammation was reduced again by 51% if the patient was prescribed anti-inflammatory steroids after their hospitalisation.

These results mean that the severity of inflammation during hospitalisation for COVID can predict the risk of subsequent serious health problems, including death, from ‘long COVID’. They also imply that current recommendations for best practice may need to be changed, to include more widespread prescription of orally taken steroids to COVID patients upon their discharge.

COVID as a chronic disease?

The authors propose that COVID should be seen as a potentially chronic disease.

“When someone has a cold or even pneumonia, we usually think of the illness being over once the patient recovers. This is different from a chronic disease, like congestive heart failure or diabetes, which continue to affect patients after an acute episode. We may similarly need to start thinking of COVID as having ongoing effects in many parts of the body after patients have recovered from the initial episode,” said Prof Mainous.

“Once we recognise the importance of ‘long Covid’ after seeming ‘recovery’, we need to focus on treatments to prevent later problems, such as strokes, brain dysfunction, and especially premature death.”

Source: Frontiers