Neurons in the brain of an Alzheimer’s patient, with plaques caused by tau proteins. Credit: NIH
Brain shrinkage observed in people receiving drugs for Alzheimer’s treatment actually reflects their efficacy, suggests to a new study from University College London. The researchers analysed data from a dozen different trials of amyloid-targeting immunotherapy – including lecanemab, recently approved in the UK for Alzheimer’s treatment but not yet used by the NHS.
While brain shrinkage is usually an undesirable outcome, the team found that the excess volume loss was consistent across studies and correlated with how effective the therapy was in removing amyloid and was not associated with harm.
As a result, the researchers believe that the removal of amyloid plaques, which are abundant in Alzheimer’s patients, could account for the observed brain volume changes. And, as such, the volume loss should not be a cause for concern.
To describe this phenomenon, the research team coined a new phrase: “amyloid-removal-related pseudo-atrophy” or ARPA. The team published their findings in published in Lancet Neurology.
Senior author and Director of the UCL Dementia Research Centre, Professor Nick Fox said: “Amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibodies represent a significant therapeutic breakthrough in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. These agents work by binding to and triggering the removal of amyloid plaques from the brain.
“One area of controversy has been the effect of these agents on brain volumes. Brain volume loss is a characteristic feature of Alzheimer’s disease, caused by progressive loss of neurons.
“Amyloid immunotherapy has consistently shown an increase in brain volume loss – leading to concerns in the media and medical literature that these drugs could be causing unrecognised toxicity to the brains of treated patients.
“However, based on the available data, we believe that this excess volume change is an anticipated consequence of the removal of pathologic amyloid plaques from the brain of patients with Alzheimer’s disease.”
In August, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) licensed lecanemab, for use in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease in the UK *.
The drug works by targeting beta amyloid – a protein that builds up in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease and is thought to be the triggering event leading to neuronal dysfunction and cell death.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) that decide whether drugs should be made available on the NHS have published draft guidance advising that the benefits of lecanemab are too small to justify the cost to the NHS. However, the decision will be reviewed following a public consultation and a second independent committee meeting later this year.
Familial Alzheimer’s disease can be transferred via bone marrow transplant, researchers show in the journal Stem Cell Reports. When the team transplanted bone marrow stem cells from mice carrying a hereditary version of Alzheimer’s disease into normal lab mice, the recipients developed Alzheimer’s disease – and at an accelerated rate.
The study highlights the role of amyloid that originates outside of the brain in the development of Alzheimer’s disease, which changes the paradigm of Alzheimer’s from being a disease that is exclusively produced in the brain to a more systemic disease. Based on their findings, the researchers say that donors of blood, tissue, organ, and stem cells should be screened for Alzheimer’s disease to prevent its inadvertent transfer during blood product transfusions and cellular therapies.
“This supports the idea that Alzheimer’s is a systemic disease where amyloids that are expressed outside of the brain contribute to central nervous system pathology,” says senior author and immunologist Wilfred Jefferies, of the University of British Columbia. “As we continue to explore this mechanism, Alzheimer’s disease may be the tip of the iceberg and we need to have far better controls and screening of the donors used in blood, organ and tissue transplants as well as in the transfers of human derived stem cells or blood products.”
To test whether a peripheral source of amyloid could contribute to the development of Alzheimer’s in the brain, the researchers transplanted bone marrow containing stem cells from mice carrying a familial version of the disease — a variant of the human amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene, which, when cleaved, misfolded and aggregated, forms the amyloid plaques that are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease. They performed transplants into two different strains of recipient mice: APP-knockout mice that lacked an APP gene altogether, and mice that carried a normal APP gene.
In this model of heritable Alzheimer’s disease, mice usually begin developing plaques at 9 to 10 months of age, and behavioural signs of cognitive decline begin to appear at 11 to 12 months of age. Surprisingly, the transplant recipients began showing symptoms of cognitive decline much earlier – at 6 months post-transplant for the APP-knockout mice and at 9 months for the “normal” mice.
“The fact that we could see significant behavioural differences and cognitive decline in the APP-knockouts at 6 months was surprising but also intriguing because it just showed the appearance of the disease that was being accelerated after being transferred,” says first author Chaahat Singh of the University of British Columbia.
In mice, signs of cognitive decline present as an absence of normal fear and a loss of short and long-term memory. Both groups of recipient mice also showed clear molecular and cellular hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease, including leaky blood-brain barriers and buildup of amyloid in the brain.
Observing the transfer of disease in APP-knockout mice that lacked an APP gene altogether, the team concluded that the mutated gene in the donor cells can cause the disease and observing that recipient animals that carried a normal APP gene are susceptible to the disease suggests that the disease can be transferred to health individuals.
Because the transplanted stem cells were hematopoietic cells, meaning that they could develop into blood and immune cells but not neurons, the researchers’ demonstration of amyloid in the brains of APP knockout mice shows definitively that Alzheimer’s disease can result from amyloid that is produced outside of the central nervous system.
Finally the source of the disease in mice is a human APP gene demonstrating the mutated human gene can transfer the disease in a different species.
In future studies, the researchers plan to test whether transplanting tissues from normal mice to mice with familial Alzheimer’s could mitigate the disease and to test whether the disease is also transferable via other types of transplants or transfusions and to expand the investigation of the transfer of disease between species.
“In this study, we examined bone marrow and stem cells transplantation. However, next it will be important to examine if inadvertent transmission of disease takes place during the application of other forms of cellular therapies, as well as to directly examine the transfer of disease from contaminated sources, independent from cellular mechanisms,” says Jefferies.
Studies at MIT and elsewhere are producing mounting evidence that light flickering and sound clicking at the gamma brain rhythm frequency of 40Hz can reduce Alzheimer’s disease (AD) progression and treat symptoms in human volunteers as well as lab mice. In a new study in Natureusing a mouse model of the disease, researchers at The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory of MIT reveal a key mechanism that may contribute to these beneficial effects: clearance of amyloid proteins, a hallmark of AD pathology, via the brain’s glymphatic system, a recently discovered “plumbing” network parallel to the brain’s blood vessels.
“Ever since we published our first results in 2016, people have asked me how does it work? Why 40Hz? Why not some other frequency?” said study senior author Li-Huei Tsai, Professor of Neuroscience at Picower. “These are indeed very important questions we have worked very hard in the lab to address.”
The new paper describes a series of experiments, led by Mitch Murdock when he was a Brain and Cognitive Sciences doctoral student at MIT, showing that when sensory gamma stimulation increases 40 Hz power and synchrony in the brains of mice, that prompts a particular type of neuron to release peptides. The study results further suggest that those short protein signals then drive specific processes that promote increased amyloid clearance via the glymphatic system.
“We do not yet have a linear map of the exact sequence of events that occurs,” said Murdock, who was jointly supervised by Tsai and co-author and collaborator Ed Boyden, Professor of Neurotechnology at MIT. “But the findings in our experiments support this clearance pathway through the major glymphatic routes.”
From gamma to glymphatics
Because prior research has shown that the glymphatic system is a key conduit for brain waste clearance and may be regulated by brain rhythms, Tsai and Murdock’s team hypothesised that it might help explain the lab’s prior observations that gamma sensory stimulation reduces amyloid levels in Alzheimer’s model mice.
Working with “5XFAD” mice, which genetically model Alzheimer’s, Murdock and co-authors first replicated the lab’s prior results that 40Hz sensory stimulation increases 40Hz neuronal activity in the brain and reduces amyloid levels. Then they set out to measure whether there was any correlated change in the fluids that flow through the glymphatic system to carry away wastes. Indeed, they measured increases in cerebrospinal fluid in the brain tissue of mice treated with sensory gamma stimulation compared to untreated controls. They also measured an increase in the rate of interstitial fluid leaving the brain. Moreover, in the gamma-treated mice he measured increased diameter of the lymphatic vessels that drain away the fluids and measured increased accumulation of amyloid in cervical lymph nodes, which is the drainage site for that flow.
To investigate how this increased fluid flow might be happening, the team focused on the aquaporin 4 (AQP4) water channel of astrocyte cells, which enables the cells to facilitate glymphatic fluid exchange. When they blocked APQ4 function with a chemical, that prevented sensory gamma stimulation from reducing amyloid levels and prevented it from improving mouse learning and memory. And when, as an added test they used a genetic technique for disrupting AQP4, that also interfered with gamma-driven amyloid clearance.
In addition to the fluid exchange promoted by APQ4 activity in astrocytes, another mechanism by which gamma waves promote glymphatic flow is by increasing the pulsation of neighbouring blood vessels. Several measurements showed stronger arterial pulsatility in mice subjected to sensory gamma stimulation compared to untreated controls.
One of the best new techniques for tracking how a condition, such as sensory gamma stimulation, affects different cell types is to sequence their RNA to track changes in how they express their genes. Using this method, Tsai and Murdock’s team saw that gamma sensory stimulation indeed promoted changes consistent with increased astrocyte AQP4 activity.
Prompted by peptides
The RNA sequencing data also revealed that upon gamma sensory stimulation a subset of neurons, called “interneurons,” experienced a notable uptick in the production of several peptides. This was not surprising in the sense that peptide release is known to be dependent on brain rhythm frequencies, but it was still notable because one peptide in particular, VIP, is associated with Alzheimer’s-fighting benefits and helps to regulate vascular cells, blood flow and glymphatic clearance.
Seizing on this intriguing result, the team ran tests that revealed increased VIP in the brains of gamma-treated mice. The researchers also used a sensor of peptide release and observed that sensory gamma stimulation resulted in an increase in peptide release from VIP-expressing interneurons.
But did this gamma-stimulated peptide release mediate the glymphatic clearance of amyloid? To find out, the team ran another experiment: they chemically shut down the VIP neurons. When they did so, and then exposed mice to sensory gamma stimulation, they found that there was no longer an increase in arterial pulsatility and there was no more gamma-stimulated amyloid clearance.
“We think that many neuropeptides are involved,” Murdock said. Tsai added that a major new direction for the lab’s research will be determining what other peptides or other molecular factors may be driven by sensory gamma stimulation.
Tsai and Murdock added that while this paper focuses on what is likely an important mechanism – glymphatic clearance of amyloid – by which sensory gamma stimulation helps the brain, it’s probably not the only underlying mechanism that matters. The clearance effects shown in this study occurred rather rapidly but in lab experiments and clinical studies weeks or months of chronic sensory gamma stimulation have been needed to have sustained effects on cognition.
With each new study, however, scientists learn more about how sensory stimulation of brain rhythms may help treat neurological disorders.
New Alzheimer’s research suggests that enhanced light sensitivity may contribute to ‘sundowning’, which is the worsening of symptoms late in the day, thereby spurring sleep disruptions thought to contribute to the disease’s progression.
Published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, these new insights from UVA Health into the disruptions of the biological clock seen in Alzheimer’s could lead to new treatments and symptom management, the researchers say. For example, caregivers often struggle with the erratic sleep patterns caused by Alzheimer’s patients’ altered circadian rhythms. Light therapy, the new research suggests, might be an effective tool to help manage that.
Better understanding Alzheimer’s effects on circadian rhythms could have implications for prevention. Poor sleep quality in adulthood is a risk factor for Alzheimer’s, as brains at rest naturally cleanse themselves of amyloid beta proteins that are thought to form harmful tangles in Alzheimer’s.
“Circadian disruptions have been recognised in Alzheimer’s disease for a long time, but we’ve never had a very good understanding of what causes them,” said researcher Thaddeus Weigel, a graduate student working with Heather Ferris, MD, PhD. “This research points to changes in light sensitivity as a new, interesting possible explanation for some of those circadian symptoms.”
Alzheimer’s hallmark is progressive memory loss, to the point that patients can forget their own loved ones, but there can be many other symptoms, such as restlessness, aggression, poor judgment and endless searching. These symptoms often worsen in the evening and at night.
Ferris and her collaborators used a mouse model of Alzheimer’s to better understand what happens to the biological clock in Alzheimer’s disease. They essentially gave the mice “jet lag” by altering their exposure to light, then examined how it affected their behaviour. The Alzheimer’s mice reacted very differently to control mice.
The Alzheimer’s mice, the scientists found, adapted to a six-hour time change significantly more quickly than the control mice. This, the scientists suspect, is the result of a heightened sensitivity to changes in light. While our biological clocks normally take cues from light, this adjustment happens gradually – thus, jet lag when we travel great distances. Our bodies need time to adapt. But for the Alzheimer’s mice, this change happened abnormally fast.
The researchers initially thought this might be because of neuroinflammation. So they looked at immune cells called microglia that have become promising targets in developing better Alzheimer’s treatments. But the scientists ultimately ruled out this hypothesis, determining that microglia did not make a difference in how quickly mice adapted. (Though targeting microglia might be beneficial for other reasons.)
Notably, the UVA scientists also ruled out another potential culprit: “mutant tau,” an abnormal protein that forms tangles in the Alzheimer’s brain. The presence of these tangles also did not make a difference in how the mice adapted.
The researchers’ results ultimately suggest there is an important role for the retina in the enhanced light sensitivity in Alzheimer’s, and that gives researchers a promising avenue to pursue as they work to develop new ways to treat, manage and prevent the disease.
“These data suggest that controlling the kind of light and the timing of the light could be key to reducing circadian disruptions in Alzheimer’s disease,” Ferris said. “We hope that this research will help us to develop light therapies that people can use to reduce the progression of Alzheimer’s disease.”
Neurons in the brain of an Alzheimer’s patient, with amyloid plaques caused by tau proteins. Credit: NIH
In a preliminary trial, a new ‘gene silencing’ treatment has been able to safely and successfully lower levels of the harmful tau protein known to cause the disease. This success, published in Nature Medicine, demonstrates that a ‘gene silencing’ approach could work in dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.
The approach uses a drug called BIIB080 (/IONIS-MAPTRx), which is an antisense oligonucleaotide (used to stop RNA producing a protein), to ‘silence’ the gene coding for the tau protein – known as the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene. This prevents the gene from being translated into the protein in a doseable and reversible way. It also reduces production of that protein, altering the course of disease.
Further trials will be needed in larger groups of patients to determine whether this leads to clinical benefit, but the phase 1 results are the first indication that this method has a biological effect.
There are currently no treatments targeting tau. The drugs aducanumab and lecanemab – recently approved for use in some situations by the FDA – target a separate disease mechanism in AD, the accumulation of amyloid plaques.
The phase 1 trial enrolled 46 patients with an average age of 66, and looked at the safety of BIIB080, what it does in the body, and how well it targets the MAPT gene. The trial compared three doses of the drug, given by intrathecal injection (an injection into the nervous system via the spinal canal), with the placebo.
Results show that the drug was well tolerated, with all patients completing the treatment period and over 90% completing the post-treatment period.
Patients in both the treatment and placebo groups experienced either mild or moderate side effects – the most common being a headache after injection of the drug. However, no serious adverse events were seen in patients given the drug.
The research team also looked at two forms of the tau protein in the central nervous system (CNS) – a reliable indicator of disease – over the duration of the study.
They found a greater than 50% reduction in levels of total tau and phosphor tau concentration in the CNS after 24 weeks in the two treatment groups that received the highest dose of the drug.
Consultant neurologist Dr Catherine Mummery, who led the study, said: “We will need further research to understand the extent to which the drug can slow progression of physical symptoms of disease and evaluate the drug in older and larger groups of people and in more diverse populations.
“But the results are a significant step forward in demonstrating that we can successfully target tau with a gene silencing drug to slow – or possibly even reverse – Alzheimer’s disease, and other diseases caused by tau accumulation in the future.”
The fields of Alzheimer’s disease and cancer research have both been shaken by recent investigations which have revealed image falsification and plagiarism. These findings call into question specific avenues of research which have received considerable funding.
Neuroscientist Matthew Schrag, a junior professor studying Alzheimer’s, had already ruffled some feathers criticising the FDA approval of the Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm when he was approached by an attorney to investigate Simufilam, another Alzheimer’s drug under development.
According to Science, he used funding given to him by the attorney to investigate the data behind the drug’s development. The research focuses on amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques, long thought to be the culprit behind Alzheimer’s.
Schrag identified apparently altered or duplicated images in dozens of journal articles, and sent them to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which had funded tens of millions of dollars.
The investigation drew him towards a bedrock of modern Alzheimer’s research, a 2006 Nature study by Sylvain Lesné of the University of Minnesota in the laboratory of Karen Ashe, which identified an amyloid beta protein.
Schrag avoids describing the suspicious data as fraud, since that would require unfettered access to the original material. “I focus on what we can see in the published images, and describe them as red flags, not final conclusions,” he said. “The data should speak for itself.”
The work focused on ‘toxic oligomers’, subtypes of Aβ that dissolve in some bodily fluids, a potential Alzheimer’s cause that had gained traction in the early 2000s partly due to their discovery in autopsied Alzheimer’s patients.
Using transgenic mice, the UMN team discovered a previously unknown oligomer species, Aβ*56. They isolated Aβ*56 and injected it into young rats, causing a reduction in cognitive ability.
This discovery, the first to show a direct cause, resulted in an explosion in related research, with related studies receiving $287 million in National Institutes of Health funding in 2021, compared to no funding in 2006.
In concert with molecular biologist Elisabeth Bik, no less than 20 of Lesné’s papers were flagged, 10 of which related to Aβ*56. A finding which some Alzheimer’s experts say calls into question 16 years of amyloid beta research. Some had been suspicious and had failed to replicate the findings, but journals are reluctant to publish research which proves a negative or which contradicts a prominent researcher’s findings.
Cancer research has been dogged by its own crisis with fabricated data, according to an investigative report by Nature. For years, a prominent US cancer-research laboratory run by leading cancer geneticist Carlo Croce at the Ohio State University (OSU) had been dogged by allegations of plagiarism and falsified images. To date 11 papers he has co-authored have been retracted, and 21 have needed corrections.
In 2017, The New York Times first reported on allegations of research misconduct against Croce, when OSU opened inquiries into papers from Croce’s lab. These proceeded to formal investigations, Nature learnt, two of which found multiple instances of research misconduct, including data falsification and plagiarism, by scientists Michela Garofalo and Flavia Pichiorri, in papers they’d authored while in Croce’s laboratory.
Garofalo claimed she did not received proper image manipulation training and Pichiorri said she did not understand plagiarism at the time. They have since moved on from OSU.
OSU declined to charge Croce with misconduct as his involvement did not relate to direct plagiarism or image fabrication, but did note that these cases resulted out of his “poor mentorship and lack of oversight.”
Croce was removed from a number of his positions – for which he attempted to sue – but is still employed by OSU, and many of the papers identified by OSU have not been retracted by their journals.
A study in the journal Neurologyhas shown that a less expensive blood test to detect Alzheimer’s is highly accurate at early detection, providing further evidence that the test should be considered for routine screening and diagnosis.
“Our study shows that the blood test provides a robust measure for detecting amyloid plaques associated with Alzheimer’s disease, even among patients not yet experiencing cognitive declines,” said senior author Professor Randall J. Bateman, MD.
“A blood test for Alzheimer’s provides a huge boost for Alzheimer’s research and diagnosis, drastically cutting the time and cost of identifying patients for clinical trials and spurring the development of new treatment options,” Prof Bateman said. “As new drugs become available, a blood test could determine who might benefit from treatment, including those at very early stages of the disease.”
Developed by Prof Bateman and colleagues, the blood test assesses whether amyloid plaques have begun accumulating in the brain based on the ratio of the levels of the amyloid beta proteins Aβ42 and Aβ40 in the blood.
The gold standard PET scan evaluation requires a radioactive brain scan, at an average cost of $5000–$8000 (R75 000–R120 000) per scan. Another common test, which analyses levels of amyloid-beta and tau protein in cerebrospinal fluid, costs about $1000 (R15 000) but requires a spinal tap process.
This study estimates that prescreening with a $500 (R7500) blood test could halve both the cost and the time it takes to enrol patients in clinical trials that use PET scans. Using only blood testing for screening could be done in under six months, a tenth or less of the cost. The test is currently only available in the US and Europe.
The current study shows that the blood test remains highly accurate, even when performed in different labs following different protocols, and in different cohorts across three continents.
Scientists didn’t know if small differences in sampling methods (such as anticoagulant use) could have a big impact on test accuracy because results are based on subtle shifts in amyloid beta protein levels in the blood. Subtle interfernece in these amyloid protein ratios could have triggered a false negative or positive result.
To confirm the test’s accuracy, researchers tested blood samples from current Alzheimer’s studies in the United States, Australia and Sweden, each of which uses different protocols for the processing of blood samples and related brain imaging.
Findings from this study confirmed that the Aβ42/Aβ40 blood test using a high-precision immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry technique developed at Washington University provides highly accurate and consistent results for both cognitively impaired and unimpaired individuals across all three studies.
When blood amyloid levels were combined with another major Alzheimer’s risk factor – the presence of the genetic variant APOE4 – the blood test accuracy was 88% compared to brain imaging and 93% when compared to spinal tap.
“These results suggest the test can be useful in identifying nonimpaired patients who may be at risk for future dementia, offering them the opportunity to get enrolled in clinical trials when early intervention has the potential to do the most good,” Prof Bateman said. “A negative test result also could help doctors rule out Alzheimer’s in patients whose impairments may be related to some other health issue, disease or medication.”
A study of five Russian cosmonauts who had stayed on the International Space Station (ISS) reveals that extended time in space causes signs of brain injury. The study is published in the scientific journal JAMA Neurology.
Scientists followed five male Russian cosmonauts working on the permanently manned International Space Station (ISS), in an orbit 400km above the surface of the Earth.
Early on in spaceflight history, extended time in zero gravity was found to result in muscle atrophy and bone loss. More recently, changes in vision were discovered during long flights, a potentially serious hazard. The vision changes were ascribed to increased cerebral pressurecaused by the lack of gravity no longer pulling fluid into the lower extremities. On Earth this is similar to lying with a head-down tilt, causing fluids to pool in the upper body and head.
Blood samples were taken from the cosmonauts, whose mean age was 49, 20 days before their departure to the ISS, where they had an average stay of 169 days.
After landing on Earth, follow-up blood samples were taken one day, one week, and about three weeks after landing. Concentrations of three of the biomarkers analysed – NFL, GFAP and the amyloid beta protein Aβ40 – were increased after their stay in space. The peak readings did not occur simultaneously after the men’s return to Earth, but their biomarker trends nonetheless broadly tallied over time.
“This is the first time that concrete proof of brain-cell damage has been documented in blood tests following space flights. This must be explored further and prevented if space travel is to become more common in the future,” said Henrik Zetterberg, professor of neuroscience and one of the study’s two senior coauthors.
”To get there, we must help one another to find out why the damage arises. Is it being weightless, changes in brain fluid, or stressors associated with launch and landing, or is it caused by something else? Here, loads of exciting experimental studies on humans can be done on Earth,” he continued.
Changes also seen in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain after space travel add evidence to the notion of spaceflight causing brain injurt. Clinical tests of the men’s brain function that show deviations linked to their assignments in space further support this, but the present study was too small to investigate these associations in detail.
Prof Zetterberg and his coauthors are currently discussing follow-up studies.
“If we can sort out what causes the damage, the biomarkers we’ve developed may help us find out how best to remedy the problem,” Prof Zetterberg said.
Cholesterol manufactured in the brain appears to play a key role in the development of Alzheimer’s disease, new research indicates.
Scientists found that cholesterol produced by cells called astrocytes is required for controlling the production of amyloid beta, a sticky protein which forms the characteristic plaques in patients with Alzheimer’s. These plaques have been the target of efforts to remove or prevent them in the hopes that this could treat or prevent Alzheimer’s.
The new findings offer important insights into how and why the plaques form and may explain why genes associated with cholesterol have been linked to increased risk for Alzheimer’s. The results also provide scientists with important direction as they seek to prevent Alzheimer’s.
“This study helps us to understand why genes linked to cholesterol are so important to the development of Alzheimer’s disease,” Heather Ferris, MD, PhD, Researcher, UVA’s Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism. “Our data point to the importance of focusing on the production of cholesterol in astrocytes and the transport to neurons as a way to reduce amyloid beta and prevent plaques from ever being formed.”
The work sheds light on the role of astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease. Scientists have known that these common brain cells undergo dramatic changes in Alzheimer’s, but they have been uncertain if the cells were suffering from the disease or contributing to it. The new results suggest the latter.
The scientists found that astrocytes help drive the progression of Alzheimer’s by making and distributing cholesterol to brain cells called neurons. This cholesterol buildup increases amyloid beta production and, in turn, fuels plaque accumulation.
Normally, the buildup of amyloid beta is limited because cholesterol is kept quite low in neurons. But in Alzheimer’s, the neurons are no longer able to regulate amyloid beta, leading to plaque formation. Blocking the astrocytes’ cholesterol manufacturing “robustly” decreased amyloid beta production in lab mice, the researchers reported. While it is presently unknown whether this could be applied in people to prevent plaque formation, the researchers believe that further research is likely to yield important insights that will benefit the battle against Alzheimer’s.
The fact that amyloid beta production is normally tightly controlled suggests an important role in brain cells, the researchers said. Doctors may therefore need to be cautious about blockage or removal of amyloid beta. Additional research into the discovery could shed light on how to prevent the over-production of amyloid beta as a strategy against Alzheimer’s, the researchers believe.
“If we can find strategies to prevent astrocytes from over-producing cholesterol, we might make a real impact on the development of Alzheimer’s disease,” Dr Ferris said. “Once people start having memory problems from Alzheimer’s disease, countless neurons have already died. We hope that targeting cholesterol can prevent that death from ever occurring in the first place.”
