Tag: 31/1/25

Categories : Lab Tests and Imaging NeurologyTags : Leave a comment

New Tech could Cut Epilepsy Misdiagnoses by up to 70% Using Routine EEGs

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay

Doctors could soon reduce epilepsy misdiagnoses by up to 70% using a new tool that turns routine electroencephalogram, or EEG, tests that appear normal into highly accurate epilepsy predictors, a Johns Hopkins University study has found.

By uncovering hidden epilepsy signatures in seemingly normal EEGs, the tool could significantly reduce false positives, seen in around 30% of cases globally, and spare patients from medication side effects, driving restrictions, and other quality-of-life challenges linked to misdiagnoses.

“Even when EEGs appear completely normal, our tool provides insights that make them actionable,” said Sridevi V. Sarma, a Johns Hopkins biomedical engineering professor who led the work. “We can get to the right diagnosis three times faster because patients often need multiple EEGs before abnormalities are detected, even if they have epilepsy. Accurate early diagnosis means a quicker path to effective treatment.”

A report of the study is newly published in Annals of Neurology.

Epilepsy causes recurrent, unprovoked seizures triggered by bursts of abnormal electrical activity in the brain. Standard care involves scalp EEG recordings during initial evaluations. These tests track brainwave patterns using small electrodes placed on the scalp.

Clinicians partly rely on EEGs to diagnose epilepsy and decide whether patients need anti-seizure medications. However, EEGs can be challenging to interpret because they capture noisy signals and because seizures rarely occur during the typical 20 to 40 minutes of an EEG recording. These characteristics makes diagnosing epilepsy subjective and prone to error, even for specialists, Sarma explained.

To improve reliability, Sarma’s team studied what happens in the brains of patients when they are not experiencing seizures. Their tool, called EpiScalp, uses algorithms trained on dynamic network models to map brainwave patterns and identify hidden signs of epilepsy from a single routine EEG.

“If you have epilepsy, why don’t you have seizures all the time? We hypothesized that some brain regions act as natural inhibitors, suppressing seizures. It’s like the brain’s immune response to the disease,” Sarma said.

The new study analyzed 198 epilepsy patients from five major medical centers: Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. Out of these 198 patients in the study, 91 patients had epilepsy while the rest had non-epileptic conditions mimicking epilepsy.

When Sarma’s team reanalysed the initial EEGs using EpiScalp, the tool ruled out 96% of those false positives, cutting potential misdiagnoses among these cases from 54% to 17%.

“This is where our tool makes a difference because it can help us uncover markers of epilepsy in EEGs that appear uninformative, reducing the risk of patients being misdiagnosed and treated for a condition they don’t have,” said Khalil Husari, co-senior author and assistant professor of neurology at Johns Hopkins. “These patients experienced side effects of the anti-seizure medication without any benefit because they didn’t have epilepsy. Without the correct diagnosis, we can’t find out what’s actually causing their symptoms.”

In certain cases, misdiagnosis happens due to misinterpretation of EEGs, Husari explained, as doctors may overdiagnose epilepsy to prevent the dangers of a second seizure. But in some cases, patients experience nonepileptic seizures, which mimic epilepsy. These conditions can often be treated with therapies that do not involve epilepsy medication.

In earlier work, the team studied epileptic brain networks using intracranial EEGs to demonstrate that the seizure onset zone is being inhibited by neighboring regions in the brain when patients are not seizing. EpiScalp builds on this research, identifying these patterns from routine scalp EEGs.

Traditional approaches to improve EEG interpretation often focus on individual signals or electrodes. Instead, EpiScalp analyses how different regions of the brain interact and influence one another through a complex network of neural pathways, said Patrick Myers, first author and doctoral student in biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins.

“If you just look at how nodes are interacting with each other within the brain network, you can find this pattern of independent nodes trying to cause a lot of activity and the suppression from nodes in a second region, and they’re not interacting with the rest of the brain,” Myers said. “We check whether we can see this pattern anywhere. Do we see a region in your EEG that has been decoupled from the rest of the brain’s network? A healthy person shouldn’t have that.”

Source: Johns Hopkins University

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease New Compounds and TreatmentsTags : Leave a comment

Why the Road for New Heart Cell Treatments is so Long

On By ModernMedia
Right side heart failure. Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0

Pathways to new treatments for heart failure take time – as long as four decades for two now accepted therapies. So, new attempts to repair scar tissue in infarcted hearts using cells or cell products need more time to develop clinical therapies that can reduce risk of death from heart failure after a heart attack.

This message is part of a critical review of cell-based and cell product-based therapies for the treatment of heart failure. The review details 20 years of completed and ongoing clinical trials. While none has gained medical approval, they have proven safe and some have shown beneficial effects.

More importantly, the reviewers note, it took longer, nearly 40 years, to optimise two current therapies to reduce mortality in heart failure: implantable cardioverter–defibrillators and guideline-directed medical therapy.

“The history of the development of life-saving medical therapies for heart failure serves as an important lesson that we should remain hopeful of the promise of cell therapy in heart failure,” Jianyi “Jay” Zhang, MD, PhD, and colleagues write in the review, “Trials and tribulations of cell therapy for heart failure: an update on ongoing trials,” published in Nature Reviews Cardiology. Zhang is professor and chair of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Department of Biomedical Engineering.

Heart failure is responsible for 13% of deaths worldwide. Half of patients with heart failure die within five years. The most common cause of heart failure is blockage of coronary arteries leading to death of the cardiomyocyte heart muscle cells. When that muscle tissue is replaced by dense scar tissue with little blood circulation, the infarcted heart loses contractile power, leading to heart enlargement, progressive loss of pumping ability, increased chance of ventricular arrhythmias and clinical end-stage heart failure.

The problem is that shortly after birth, human heart muscle cells lose their ability to divide, so a damaged infarcted heart cannot repair itself by growing new muscle cells. Thus, the simple idea behind initial cell therapies was to add or inject replacement cells to the scar area to restore muscle tissue.

The two decades since has been a long road, with bumps and turns. The three parts of the Nature Reviews Cardiology paper describe the journey. 

First is a history of the slow development, obstacles, setbacks and scepticism for two current heart failure therapies, implantable cardioverter–defibrillators and guideline-directed medical therapy. The next two sections, and main focus of the review, survey 13 completed clinical trials published in the last 12 years and 10 very recently initiated and ongoing clinical trials that are based on the lessons learned from the past 20 years of research, to assess the safety and efficacy of cell- and cell products-based therapy approaches.

While several randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase II or III trials published in the past 20 years support the concept that even a single dose of cell products has beneficial effects in patients with heart failure on optimal medical therapy, the ongoing trial are taking novel directions, Zhang says. 

These include:

  • New cell types — pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes/ spheroids and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells
  • Repeated intravenous injections as a noninvasive cell delivery method
  • New cell products, such as engineered epicardial cardiomyocyte patches
  • Novel cell-free products — extracellular vesicle-enriched or exosome-enriched secretomes.

“The results of these trials will continue to define and refine our understanding of cell and cell product therapy as a novel addition in the treatment of patients with heart failure,” Zhang said. 

The review acknowledges scientific criticism during the slow but consistent progress and evolution of cell therapy. Some have questioned the use of public funding to support cell therapy research for heart failure treatment, due to poorly designed or underpowered clinical trials and very modest improvements in cardiac function in preclinical studies that are not always substantiated in large-scale clinical trials.

“These criticisms must be addressed in future trials that are adequately powered and rigorously designed to ensure continued progress of the field,” Zhang said. “Critique is an essential part of science, and the basis for growth, innovation and evolution – this is no less true for the field of cell therapy.” 

Yet Zhang is confident that current research will yield clinical translation. “In the past 20 years, cell therapy has emerged and evolved as a promising avenue for cardiac repair and regeneration,” he said. “Cell therapy has encountered substantial barriers in both preclinical studies and clinical trials, but the field continues to progress and evolve through lessons learned from such research.”

Source: University of Alabama at Birmingham

Categories : CancerTags : Leave a comment

New Combination Immunotherapy for Melanoma and Breast Cancer

On By ModernMedia
3D structure of a melanoma cell derived by ion abrasion scanning electron microscopy. Credit: Sriram Subramaniam/ National Cancer Institute

A research team at the Medical University of Vienna led by Maria Sibilia has investigated a new combination therapy against cancer. This therapy employs systemic administration of the tissue hormone interferon-I combined with local application of Imiquimod. Promising results were seen in topically accessible tumours like melanoma and breast cancer models: rhe therapy led to the death of tumour cells at the treated sites and simultaneously activated the adaptive immune system to fight even distant metastases. The findings, published in Nature Cancer, could improve the treatment of superficial tumours such as melanoma and breast cancer.

In recent years, immunotherapies have had significant success in the treatment and cure of a wide range of cancers. However, for some patients, these agents are still not sufficiently effective. As part of a preclinical study, Maria Sibilia, Head of the Center for Cancer Research at the Medical University of Vienna, therefore investigated the effects of a combination immunotherapy consisting of systemic administration of the tissue hormone interferon (IFN)-I and local imiquimod therapy. Imiquimod is an active substance that activates the innate receptors TLR7/8 and used to treat basal cell carcinomas. The researchers employed various preclinical mouse tumour models of melanoma and breast cancer. What both tumours have in common is that they are accessible to local therapy and often form distant metastases.

Effective for local tumours and distant metastases

Immunotherapies use the body’s own immune system to fight cancer cells. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), which are activated by Imiquimod via TLR7/8, play an important role in this process. The study showed that oral imiquimod stimulates pDCs to produce the tissue hormone IFN-I. This sensitised other dendritic cells and macrophages in the tumour environment to topical imiquimod therapy, which inhibited the formation of new blood vessels via the cytokine IL12 leading to the death of tumour cells.
The combination immunotherapy not only had an effect on the treated tumours, but also on distant metastases. It reduced the formation of new metastases thus preventing tumour relapses and increasing the sensitivity of melanomas to checkpoint inhibitors.

“These findings illustrate that the combination of systemic treatment with imiquimod or IFN-I and topical therapy with imiquimod has the potential to expand treatment options for patients and improve therapy outcomes in locally accessible tumors such as melanoma or breast cancer,” emphasizes Maria Sibilia.
“Topical treatment of the primary tumor with imiquimod is essential for this combination therapy with systemic IFN-I to be effective at the treated site and also to clear distant metastases,” adds Philipp Novoszel, MedUni Vienna, one of the first authors of the study.

The results suggest that this therapeutic strategy has the potential to improve treatment outcomes in superficial and thus locally accessible tumors such as melanoma and breast cancer – on the one hand through therapy-associated cancer cell death at the locally treated tumors, but also through the induction of a T cell-induced anti-tumor immune response at distant metastases, which is further enhanced by checkpoint inhibitors.

“Our aim is to continue developing immunotherapeutic strategies in order to improve the long-term prospects for patients who are not yet responding well to these agents,” says Maria Sibilia, who is also Deputy Head of the Comprehensive Cancer Center of MedUni Vienna and University Hospital Vienna.
“As systemic interferon is a well-known cancer therapy and dendritic cells are activated in a similar way to our preclinical models, we believe that the new combination therapy can show an effect in patients,” adds Martina Sanlorenzo, dermato-oncologist at MedUni Vienna and co-first author of the study.

Publication: Nature Cancer
Systemic IFN-I combined with topical TLR7/8 agonists promotes distant tumor-suppression by c-Jun-dependent IL-12 expression in dendritic cells
Sanlorenzo M, Novoszel P, Vujic I, Gastaldi T, Hammer M, Fari O, De Sa Fernandes C, Landau AD, Göcen-Oguz BV, Holcmann M, Monshi B, Rappersberger K, Agnes Csiszar A, Sibilia M
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00889-9; https://www.nature.com/articles/s43018-024-00889-9

Source: Medical University of Vienna

Categories : CancerTags : Leave a comment

Routine Brain MRI Screening Urged in Asymptomatic Late Stage Breast Cancer

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Anna Shvets on Pexels

A new study led by researchers at Moffitt Cancer Center shows that asymptomatic brain metastasis is more common in stage 4 breast cancer patients than previously believed. The study, published in Neuro-Oncology, suggests that doctors may need to rethink current screening guidelines for detecting brain metastasis in patients without symptoms.

Researchers examined 101 asymptomatic patients diagnosed with stage 4 breast cancer, including triple-negative, HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. These patients underwent MRI scans to check for brain metastasis, with a follow-up MRI six months later if the initial scan showed no signs of cancer spread.

Of the patients who completed the initial MRI, 14% had brain metastasis. The rates by subtype were:

  • 18% in triple-negative breast cancer
  • 15% in HER2-positive breast cancer
  • 10% in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer

After the second MRI, the number of patients with brain metastasis grew to about 25% in each subtype. Following diagnosis, patients went on to receive early treatment for their brain metastases, including changes in systemic therapy and local therapies.

“Our study suggests that asymptomatic brain metastasis is quite common in stage 4 breast cancer,” said Kamran Ahmed, MD, associate member and section chief for Breast Radiation Oncology at Moffitt and principal investigator of the study. “Although larger studies are needed to confirm our findings, given the improvements in systemic and local therapies for breast cancer brain metastasis, the time may be appropriate to reconsider current guidelines that recommend against routine MRI surveillance in late stage breast cancer.”

Source: H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute

Categories : Obstetrics & Gynaecology Surgeries & ProceduresTags : Leave a comment

Removing Fallopian Tubes during Other Abdominal Surgeries may Lower Ovarian Cancer Risk

On By ModernMedia

Mathematical modelling study suggests this approach could also reduce total healthcare costs in Germany

Female reproductive system. Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0 BY-SA

A mathematical modelling study conducted in Germany suggests that ovarian cancer incidence could be reduced and healthcare savings boosted if women who have already completed their families were offered fallopian tube removal during any other suitable abdominal surgeries. Angela Kather and Ingo Runnebaum of Jena University Hospital, Germany, and colleagues present these findings on January 30th in the open-access journal PLOS Medicine.

Some of the most widespread and serious forms of ovarian cancer begin in the fallopian tubes, and removing them may reduce ovarian cancer risk. While women at average risk of ovarian cancer are not recommended to have surgery solely to remove their fallopian tubes, many surgeons offer “opportunistic” tube removal during other gynaecologic surgeries such as hysterectomy or tubal sterilisation. Opportunistic removal may also be feasible during other abdominal surgeries, such as gallbladder removal.

However, the overall potential benefits of opportunistic fallopian tube removal have been unclear. To help clarify, Kather and colleagues developed a mathematical model that incorporates real-world patient statistics to predict population-level risks of ovarian cancer after opportunistic fallopian tube removal, as well as the potential healthcare cost savings.

By applying the model to statistics from Germany, the researchers predicted that opportunistic fallopian tube removal during every hysterectomy and tubal sterilisation could reduce ovarian cancer cases by 5% across the female population of Germany. Removal during every suitable abdominal surgery for women who are done having children could reduce nationwide cancer cases by 15%, the analysis suggests, and it could save more than €10 million in healthcare costs annually.

Ovarian cancer is the third most common gynaecologic cancer in the world and has a mortality rate of 66%. Overall, these findings suggest that opportunistic fallopian tube removal during appropriate abdominal surgeries could not only lower population-level ovarian cancer risks and prevent ovarian cancer deaths, but also provide economic benefits. This study could help inform health policy and insurance costs for the procedure.

The authors add, “We developed a mathematical model to estimate the likelihood of women undergoing surgeries that offer an opportunity for fallopian tube removal and the potential for reducing their ovarian cancer risk. Applying this model to the entire female population of Germany revealed that 15% of ovarian cancer cases could be prevented if fallopian tubes were removed during every suitable abdominal surgery in women who have completed their families. This approach has the potential to extend healthy years of life and significantly save healthcare costs.”

Provided by PLOS