New research suggests that wound healing could be enhanced by replicating platelet-rich plasma from our blood to create implants introduced into the wound.
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a natural healing substance in our blood. Researchers explored ways of enhancing the wound healing process by extracting PRP from the blood of a patient with a complex skin wound and manipulating it through 3D printing to form an implant for tissue repair which can be used to treat difficult-to-heal skin wounds in a single surgical procedure.
The results, which are reported in Advanced Functional Materials, showed that application of the 3D-printed PRP implant helped to speed up the healing of the wound by enabling efficient vascularisation and inhibiting fibrosis, which are both essential for effective wound healing.
Professor Fergal O’Brien, at RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences said: “Existing literature suggests that while the PRP already present in our blood helps to heal wounds, scarring can still occur. By 3D-printing PRP into a biomaterial scaffold, we can increase the formation of blood vessels while also avoiding the formation of scars, leading to more successful wound healing.
“As well as promising results for skin wound healing, this technology can potentially be used to regenerate different tissues, therefore dramatically influencing the ever-growing regenerative medicine, 3D printing and personalised medicine markets.”
As world leaders seek to reassure an anxious world about the emergence of Omicron, Moderna’s CEO believes that vaccines will not have the same level of effectiveness against the new variant. Meanwhile, other major vaccine developers such as Oxford University maintain that it is still too early as yet to draw conclusions, and existing vaccines can be updated in a matter of months.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel said that “in no world” would vaccines protect against Omicron at the same level as they did against Delta. He added that he thought it would be “material drop”, though data was still to come. However, the scientists he spoke to had all said “‘This is not going to be good’.” This is because 32 of the variant’s 50 mutations are on the Spike protein, which current vaccines are designed to target.
He noted the reduced effectiveness of existing vaccines against Delta, saying that scientists had not expected such a high level of mutation to emerge for another two to three years. His comments come in stark contrast to others who stress that there is no information yet to suggest that Omicron is any more serious than previous variants, or that vaccines are less effective against it.
Oxford University released a statement saying they were monitoring the situation, but stood ready to produce a new vaccine if necessary.
“Despite the appearance of new variants over the past year, vaccines have continued to provide very high levels of protection against severe disease and there is no evidence so far that Omicron is any different.
“However, we have the necessary tools and processes in place for rapid development of an updated COVID vaccine if it should be necessary.”
Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla said in an interview with CNBC that his company had already started work on an updated vaccine, which would be ready in 100 days.
In the Netherlands, scientists from the country’s National Institute of Public Health said that they had detected Omicron on flights that had arrived from Southern Africa before the official announcement of the discovery by South Africa. The country is now trying to locate and isolate some 5000 individuals who arrived in the country from the region.
Researchers have developed a new method to precisely and rapidly correct genetic alterations in cultured patient cells.
The genetically corrected stem cells are produced from a 2–3 mm skin biopsy taken from patients with different genetic diseases. The corrected stem cells are essential in the research and for the development of new therapies for the diseases in question.
The scientists based the new method on previous groundbreaking research in the fields of stem cells and gene editing; the first technique is the invention of induced pluripotent stem cells, iPSCs from differentiated cells, which won the Nobel in 2012. The other technique is the CRISPR-Cas9 ‘gene scissors’, which got the prize in 2020. The new method combines these techniques to correct gene alterations that cause inherited diseases, creating fully functional new stem cells.
The researchers aim to eventually produce autologous cells with therapeutic properties. The use of the patient’s own corrected cells could help in avoiding the immunological challenges hampering the organ and tissue transplantation from a donor. The new method was developed by PhD student Sami Jalil and is published in Stem Cell Reports.
More than 6000 inherited diseases are known to exist, which are caused by various gene alterations. Currently, some are treated with a cell or organ transplant from a healthy donor, if available.
“Our new system is much faster and more precise than the older methods in correcting the DNA errors, and the speed makes it easier and diminishes also the risk of unwanted changes,” commented adjunct professor Kirmo Wartiovaara, who supervised the work.
“In perfect conditions, we have reached up to 100 percent efficacy, although one has to remember that the correction of cultured cells is still far away from proven therapeutic applications. But it is a very positive start” Prof Wartiovaara added.
A new study from Karolinska Institutet in Sweden suggests that the early stages of sarcopenia, where muscles weaken with age faster than expected, could be counteracted with timely interventions designed to preserve physical and cognitive function and manage chronic conditions. The study’s findings are published in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.
Muscle mass and function is lost with ageing. When this decline is more extensive or rapid than expected, it is categorised as sarcopenia, a common condition in the elderly that often lowers quality of life and increases fall and fracture risks.
Researchers examined how different factors such as sex, age, educational level, living arrangement, lifestyle and chronic conditions affected the development of sarcopenia in people aged 60 and above across a 12-year period.
When the study began, almost 10% of the nearly 3200 participants had sarcopenia, 27% had probable sarcopenia and just over 63% no sarcopenia. Measurements such as grip strength, walking speed, speed of rising from a chair five times and calf circumference were used to assess muscle strength and mass and physical performance.
“Perhaps the most interesting result was that after five years, a roughly equal proportion (just over 10 percent) of the individuals with probable sarcopenia had either improved or deteriorated. This suggests that sarcopenia is a dynamic condition that is modifiable especially in the initial stages, which is a hopeful message,” said corresponding author Caterina Trevisan, affiliated researcher at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet.
Physical activity and higher results on cognitive tests improved odds of improvement and lowered mortality risk, while a higher number of chronic conditions, male sex and older age had the opposite correlation. For individuals initially diagnosed with severe sarcopenia, there was little chance of improvement, and many of them (almost 71%) died during the follow-up period.
“Our results support the need of early interventions to preserve physical and cognitive functions and manage chronic conditions in older individuals,” says the study’s last author Anna-Karin Welmer, senior lecturer at the Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet. “With these tools, we could probably counteract muscle deterioration and the impairment in quality of life this entails. We now need intervention studies to find ways to use these tools to counteract sarcopenia.”
Twenty years ago, clinicians first attempted to regenerate a failing human heart by injecting muscle myoblasts into the heart during a bypass operation. Despite high initial hopes and multiple studies since then, attempts to remuscularise an injured heart have met with little, if any, success.
Yet, there is hope that a therapy will be developed, according to experts in a Journal of the American College of Cardiology state-of-the-art review. The challenge is this: A heart attack kills heart muscle cells, leading to a scar that weakens the heart, often causing eventual heart failure. The lack of muscle repair is due to the very limited ability of mammalian heart muscle cells to proliferate, except during a brief period around birth.
In the review, the experts focus on three topics. First are several recent clinical trials with intriguing results. Second is the current trend of using cell-derived products like exosomes rather than muscle cells to treat the injured heart. For the third topic, authors discuss likely future experiments to replace a myocardial scar with heart muscle cells by ‘turning back the clock’ of the existing cardiomyocytes, rather than trying to inject exogenous cells. These efforts try to reverse the inability of mature mammalian heart muscle cells to proliferate.
Clinical trials One of the clinical trials reviewed involved giving cardiosphere-derived cells to patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, which affects both heart and skeletal muscles.
Cardiosphere-derived cells are a type of heart stromal/progenitor cell that has potent immunomodulatory, antifibrotic and regenerative activity in both diseased hearts and skeletal muscle. The HOPE-2 trial gave repeated intravenous doses of cardiosphere-derived cells to patients with advanced Duchenne disease, most of whom were unable to walk. Preliminary results showed safety, as well as major improvements in heart parameters such as left ventricle ejection fraction and reduced left ventricle size.
The HOPE-2 trial evaluated a repeated sequential dosing regimen of cell therapy for any cardiac indication, evaluated intravenous cardiosphere-derived administration, and clinically benefitted Duchenne patients.
Two features of the trial may bode well: a move away from invasive cardiac-targeted cell delivery and toward easily administered intravenous cell delivery, and the use of sequential repeated cell doses.
Cell-derived products Few cells transplanted into the heart survive, though some functional benefits in heart performance have been seen despite physical clearance of grafted cells. It could be possible that the cells were acting not as replacements but rather boosters of endogenous repair pathways through the release of a wide array of tissue-repairing biomolecules. This led to investigation of using cell-derived products rather than transplanting cells. Most of these biomolecules – proteins and non-coding nucleic acids – are enclosed in tiny vesicles that cells release naturally. When the vesicles, including exosomes, merge into recipient cells, the biomolecules can modulate signaling pathways. Using vesicles or exosomes involves a simpler manufacturing process compared with live cells, the ability to control quality and potency, and being able to refrigerate the vesicles to make administration simpler.
An alternative approach to the vesicle cell-derived products was the finding that injected stem cells can promote cardiac repair through release of biologically active molecules acting as short-range, paracrine hormones. These molecules are distinct from the biomolecules in vesicles or exosomes.
However, before use of any of these cell-derived products for heart repair in early trials, the reviewers say, more experiments are needed in purification of the products, potential modes of delivery and the suitability of repeated doses.
Proliferation of endogenous heart cells The final review topic looked ahead toward endogenous generation of cardiomyocytes – in other words, forcing existing native cardiomyocytes to divide, or other cells to become cardiomyocytes.
Pigs can regenerate heart muscle for only a few days after birth. But in one remarkable study, researchers injured the heart by removing part of the apex of the left ventricle one day after birth, and then induced heart attack 28 days after birth. Control pigs without the Day 1 resection showed no repair of heart attack damage at Day 56. In contrast, the pigs that had a resection one day after birth, and then had experimental heart attacks at Day 28, showed heart repair by Day 56 – notably an absence of dead heart muscle, known as an infarction. Furthermore, these pigs had more cardiomyocytes throughout their left ventricles.
This study showed that heart muscle cells in large mammals can be induced to proliferate and regenerate by inducing a heart injury at Day 1 to extend the neonatal regneration window. “If this cardiomyocyte cell-cycle activation can be activated in neonates, the same signaling pathways may be activated in adults as well,” the authors wrote, “which is highly impactful and significant.”
Another possible approach to endogenous generation is the direct programming of cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes. Inducing proliferation of cardiomyocytes will also need ways to promote growth of heart blood vessels to supply the new cardiomyocytes.
In conclusion, the authors believe that short-term approaches to clinical trials of post heart-attack therapies will use cells like cardiospheres or cell products. The longer-term approach, the reviewers said, will target “a more direct remuscularisation of the injured left ventricle by ‘turning back the clock’ of the cardiomyocyte cell-cycle or generating new cardiomyocytes from other cell types such as fibroblasts.”
“However, the efficiency and safety of these strategies, particularly their ability to generate cardiomyocytes seamlessly coupled with their native counterparts and to allow a regulation of these induced proliferative events preventing an uncontrolled and harmful cardiac growth, still need to be appropriately addressed before moving to clinical applications.”
