Tag: 25/9/24

New Approach to Defibrillation may Improve Cardiac Arrest Outcomes

Photo by Mikhail Nilov

Joshua Lupton, MD, has no memory of his own cardiac arrest in 2016. He only knows that first responders resuscitated his heart with a shock from a defibrillator, ultimately leading to his complete recovery and putting him among fewer than one in 10 people nationwide who survive cardiac arrest outside of a hospital.

He attributes his survival to the rapid defibrillation he received from first responders – but not everybody is so fortunate.

Now, as lead author on an observational study published in JAMA Network Open, he and co-authors from Oregon Health & Science University say the study suggests the position in which responders initially place the two defibrillator pads on the body may make a significant difference in returning spontaneous blood circulation after shock from a defibrillator.

“The less time that you’re in cardiac arrest, the better,” said Lupton, assistant professor of emergency medicine in the OHSU School of Medicine. “The longer your brain has low blood flow, the lower your chances of having a good outcome.”

Researchers used data from the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry, which comprehensively recorded the placement position of defibrillation pads from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023. For purposes of the study, researchers reviewed 255 cases treated by Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, where the two pads were placed either at the front and side or front and back.

They found placing the pads in front and back had 2.64-fold greater odds of returning spontaneous blood circulation, compared with placing the pads on the person’s front and side.

The current common knowledge among health care professionals is that pad placement – whether front and side, or front and back – is equally beneficial in cardiac arrest. The researchers cautioned that their new study is only observational and not a definitive clinical trial. Yet, given the crucial importance of reviving the heartbeat as quickly as possible, the results do suggest a benefit from placing the pads on the front and back rather than the front and side.

“The key is, you want energy that goes from one pad to the other through the heart,” said senior author Mohamud Daya, MD, professor of emergency medicine in the OHSU School of Medicine.

Placing the pads in the front and back may effectively “sandwich” the heart, raising the possibility that the electrical current will be delivered more comprehensively to the organ. 

However, that’s not readily possible in many cases. For example, the patient may be overweight or positioned in such a way that they can’t be easily moved.

“It can be hard to roll people,” said Daya, who also serves as medical director for Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue. “Emergency medical responders can often do it, but the lay public may not be able to move a person. It’s also important to deliver the electrical current as quickly as possible.”

In that respect, pad placement is only one factor among many in successfully treating cardiac arrest.

Lupton survived his cardiac arrest and went on to complete medical school at the very hospital where he spent several days recovering in the intensive care unit – Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. The episode led him to alter the focus of his research so that he could examine ways to optimise early care for cardiac arrest patients.

The results of the new study surprised him.

“I didn’t expect to see such a big difference,” he said. “The fact that we did may light a fire in the medical community to fund some additional research to learn more.”

Source: Oregon Health & Science University

An Expected Rebound in Cancer Diagnoses after the Pandemic did not Manifest

Although new cancer diagnoses largely returned to pre-pandemic levels by 2021, the recovery does not account for the potential missed diagnoses due to delays in screening and other medical care in early 2020. Credit: National Cancer Institute

Cancer incidence trends in 2021 largely returned to what they were before the COVID pandemic, according to a study by researchers at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). However, there was little evidence of a rebound in incidence that would account for the decline in diagnoses in 2020, when screening and other medical care was disrupted, according to findings published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. One exception was breast cancer, where the researchers did see an uptick in diagnoses of advanced-stage disease in 2021.

A previous study showed that new cancer diagnoses fell abruptly in early 2020, as did the volume of pathology reports, suggesting that many cancers were not being diagnosed in a timely manner. To determine whether these missed diagnoses were caught in 2021, possibly as more advanced cancers, researchers from NIH’s National Cancer Institute (NCI) compared observed cancer incidence rates for 2021 with those expected from pre-pandemic trends using data from NCI’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.

A full recovery in cancer incidence should appear as an increase over pre-pandemic levels (also known as a rebound) to account for the missed diagnoses. The researchers looked at cancer overall, as well as five major cancer types that vary in how they are typically detected: through screening (female breast and prostate cancer), due to symptoms (lung and bronchus and pancreatic cancer), or incidentally during other medical procedures (thyroid cancer).  

Cancer incidence rates overall and for most specific cancers approached pre-pandemic levels, with no significant rebound to account for the 2020 decline. However, in addition to an uptick in new diagnoses of advanced breast cancer in 2021, the data also provided some evidence of an increase in diagnoses of advanced pancreatic cancer. Also, new diagnoses of thyroid cancers in 2021 were still below pre-pandemic levels. 

The researchers concluded that 2021 was a transition year that was still affected by new variants and new waves of COVID-19 cases, which continued to impact medical care. They said the findings highlight the need for ongoing monitoring to understand the long-term impacts of the pandemic on cancer diagnoses and outcomes.

Source: NIH/National Cancer Institute

Why do Some Parkinson’s Disease Treatments Affect Decision Making?

Created with Gencraft. CC4.0

Parkinson’s disease, a debilitating nervous system disorder, is treated with medications that sometimes cause impaired decision-making and poor impulse control. Now, researchers from Fujita Health University in Japan have identified a structure in the brain called the external globus pallidus which may be responsible for this side effect, paving the way for new treatments.

Parkinson’s disease (PD), also known simply as Parkinson’s, is a disorder of the nervous system that affects millions of people worldwide. The nerve cell damage associated with Parkinson’s can cause tremors, slowed movements, problems with balance, and many other symptoms which worsen gradually over time. Although there is no cure, there are medications available that can treat PD symptoms. Some of these medications, however, have previously unexplained side effects – including impaired decision-making that leads to potentially harmful behaviours such as pathological gambling, binge eating and compulsive shopping.

Now, in a study published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, researchers at Fujita Health University in Japan, led by Assistant Professor Hisayoshi Kubota from the Division of Behavioral Neuropharmacology, International Center for Brain Science (ICBS), Fujita Health University, have investigated the mechanism by which a drug called pramipexole or PPX impairs the decision-making process in mice with Parkinson’s disease. The research was co-authored by Professor Taku Nagai from the Division of Behavioral Neuropharmacology, International Center for Brain Science (ICBS), and Professor Hirohisa Watanabe from the Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, both at Fujita Health University.

To take a closer look at the findings of this study, we first need to understand how PPX works to alleviate PD symptoms. PD mainly results from a loss of nerve cells or neurons that produce a compound called dopamine. Some neurons are dependent on dopamine for their regular functioning – they have structures called ‘dopamine receptors’ which can be thought of as locks which can then be activated using dopamine as the ‘key’. Drugs like PPX can imitate the function of dopamine and bind to these receptors instead, especially in patients with PD who lack dopamine-producing neurons.

To study the effects of PPX on PD, the researchers injected the brains of mice with a toxin called 6-hydroxydopamine (or 6-OHDA). 6-OHDA damages neurons in a very similar manner to that observed in the brains of patients with PD. The mice were treated with PPX and then subjected to a touchscreen-based ‘gambling task’ to test their decision-making skills. Interestingly, these mice picked the high-risk/high-reward option much more often – they opted for a disadvantageous outcome where they received a large reward (of strawberry milkshake), which also comes with an increased risk of a large punishment by exposure to flashing lights.

But which part of the brain is responsible for this behaviour? Investigating the brains of mice treated with PPX revealed that a region deep inside the brain called the external globus pallidus (GPe) was hyperactivated, or showed a much higher level of neuron activity. The researchers then chemically inhibited the neurons in the GPe, which actually reduced disadvantageous risk-taking activity in the mice. This proved that hyperactivation of the GPe was indeed responsible for poor decision-making in the mice treated with PPX.

This study has huge implications for treating patients with Parkinson’s disease. “Our findings could lead to the development of new medications or interventions that specifically target the external globus pallidus,” explains Dr. Kubota. “This would help to prevent or reduce decision-making impairments in Parkinson’s disease patients.“

Besides helping medical professionals develop better treatments for Parkinson’s disease, these findings can also help improve awareness among affected patients, their families, as well as the general public. Dr. Kubota, explains that “Investigating how Parkinson’s disease medications affect decision-making will help the public to better understand the complexity of the disease and its treatment.” He also says “This will benefit patients, their families and carers, and motivate them to consider early care and preventive strategies.”

These findings shed new light on the complex processes in the brain that aid our everyday decision-making skills, and promise to improve quality of life for patients affected by Parkinson’s disease. Maybe we can take away some important lessons from this study as well, and think twice before we indulge in poor decision-making in our daily lives!

CareFirst Clinches Top Prize at Stuff Magazine App Awards

In a remarkable achievement, CareFirst, the innovative healthcare web app developed by First Care Solutions, has secured 1st place in the Health Section at the 2024 Stuff Awards. Held annually by Stuff Magazine, these prestigious awards recognise excellence in digital innovation and technological advancement.

CareFirst has quickly emerged as a game-changer in South Africa’s healthcare landscape, offering users:

  • Instant medical consultations with qualified doctors, available 24/7 – 365
  • AI-powered Vital Scanning: Advanced technology to monitor key health metrics including blood pressure, respiratory rate, and heart rate.
  • Comprehensive Medical Services: Convenient access to doctors’ consultations, prescriptions, sick notes, and referrals.

‘’I’m really proud of what our team has created. CareFirst is a platform that can really transform the way people access healthcare,’’ says Dr Steve Holt, Chief Executive Officer – at First Care Solutions.

CareFirst represents a shift towards more accessible, efficient and personalised care, promising a future where quality care is available to everyone, regardless of their location or time constraint and this award is a testament to that.

SA Heart Congress Unites Cardiologists for Better Care

The SA Heart Annual Congress will take place from 8–10 November at the Sandton Convention Centre, Johannesburg. The three-day Congress, themed ‘Cardiology Connections,’ will promote collaboration and dialogue among local and international Cardiology professionals. The congress offers a unique platform for experts, practitioners, and researchers worldwide to share insights on the latest advancements and challenges in cardiovascular medicine.

The dynamic programme includes keynote speeches, panel discussions, workshops, and networking sessions. The agenda covers a comprehensive range of cardiology topics, designed to provide practical knowledge and inspire innovation in the field. Attendees will gain critical insights into the latest developments that have the potential to enhance patient care.

“We are excited to welcome a distinguished international and local faculty,” says Dr Ahmed Vachiat, SA Heart Congress Convenor. “At the core of SA Heart is the mission to advance cardiovascular care through education, research, and advocacy. By connecting healthcare professionals from across sectors, this Congress will drive forward our vision of improving cardiovascular care for all in South Africa. We are also grateful for the invaluable support of our local experts, whose contributions consistently uphold international standards of excellence.”

A significant focus this year is strengthening connections among various special interest groups, including the Society of Cardiovascular Interventions (SASCI), Cardiovascular Imaging Society of South Africa (CISSA), Cardiovascular Arrhythmia Society of South Africa (CASSA), Heart Failure Association of South Africa (HEFFSA), Intervention Society of Cardiovascular Allied Professionals (ISCAP), South African Society of Cardiovascular Research (SASCAR), and the Paediatric Society of Cardiology (PCSSA).

Joint sessions and interdisciplinary programmes will enable these groups to work together to enhance healthcare delivery for all patients in need of cardiac intervention and treatment. Workshops and scientific sessions will feature innovative learning approaches aimed at facilitating knowledge exchange and professional growth.

A cardiovascular team from the Mayo Clinic – Prof Vuyi Nkomo (Imaging Cardiologist), Prof Sorin Pislaru (Chair, Structural Heart Disease), and Dr Juan Crestanello (Chair, Cardiothoracic Surgery) – will conduct an echocardiography workshop and contribute to various specialist workshops on Friday morning, November 8th.

Dr Thomas Alexander, a respected interventional cardiologist based in India, will share insights on establishing STEMI networks in South Africa. Prof Stylianos Pyxaras from Germany and Dr Andrew Ludwiniec from the UK will discuss chronic total occlusions and complex coronary interventions. Prof Azfar Zaman and Prof Roy Gardner also from the UK and leaders in their field, as well as Prof Thierry Lefevre from France, will join esteemed local experts in addressing important cardiovascular topics.

A new addition to this year’s programme is the Imbizo on Rheumatology and Cardiac diseases. Over 40 Abstracts have been submitted and research sessions guided by SASCAR will be keeping delegates up to date with the latest in the field of Cardiology.

In addition, an excellent parallel paediatric programme will feature global leaders, Prof Krishna Kumar, from India and Prof McDaniel from the USA, with a pre-congress workshop and highly interactive sessions that will incorporate insights from local experts.

“This year, a Heartbeat Stage will feature insightful talks, engaging presentations, and a special networking address,” says Dr Vachiat. “We are honoured to have Dr Imtiaz Sooliman from Gift of the Givers, who will share his thoughts on ‘Connecting Hearts and Social Responsibility’.”

For more information, visit SA Heart.