Tag: 23/11/21

IBS Dietary Therapy Works Best with Certain Gut Microbiomes

Beneficial gut bacteria. Credit: Darryl Leja, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health

People who respond well to the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) dietary therapy of reduced fermentable carbs have an abundance of particular types of bacteria in their gut, reveals research published online in the journal Gut.

The composition of the gut microbiome is thought to have a major role in the development of IBS. Restricting fermentable carbs, found in many foods including wheat, onions, and milk, is usually recommended to ease symptoms, an approach known as the low FODMAP (fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols) diet. But why this diet works is not fully understood.

In a bid to fill this knowledge gap, the researchers analysed stool samples of 56 people with IBS and 56 people who lived with them, but without the condition, to identify the microbial profile and genes involved in converting food into active molecules while on their usual diet.

They then assessed the clinical response in 41 of these pairs after 4 weeks on the low FODMAP diet by reviewing their stool samples again.

Before adoption of the low FODMAP diet, analysis of the stool samples of those with IBS revealed two distinct microbial ‘signatures’, which the researchers referred to as ‘pathogenic-like’ (IBSP) and as ‘health-like’ (IBSH).

The pathogenic microbial signature was abundant in harmful Firmicutes sp, including known disease causing bacteria, such as C. difficileC. sordellii and C. perfringens, but very low in beneficial Bacteroidetes species.

The lactic acid bacteria Streptococcus parasanguinis and Streptococcus timonensis that are usually found in the mouth were also abundant. And bacterial genes for amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism were overexpressed, which may explain the excess of some metabolites that are linked to IBS symptoms, say the researchers.

The healthy microbial signature of the other IBS patients was similar to that found in the comparison group (household members).

After 4 weeks on the low FODMAP diet, the microbiome of the comparison group and those with the healthy microbial profile stayed the same.

But the microbiome of those with the pathogenic profile became healthier, with an increase in Bacteroidetes, and a fall in Firmicutes species. And the bacterial genes involved in the metabolism of amino acids and carbs were no longer overexpressed.

In 3 out of 4 of IBS patients, symptoms improved. But the clinical response to the low FODMAP diet was greater in those with IBS and a pathogenic microbial signature than it was in those with IBS and a healthy microbial signature in their gut.

“The evidence associating diet, the microbiome and symptoms in [pathogenic IBS] is compelling, but studies following the introduction of candidate organisms into an animal model are needed to prove the relationship is causal,”  the researchers cautioned.

Nevertheless, they suggest their findings could lead to a microbial signature to identify those who would respond best to a low FODMAP diet and better manage those who wouldn’t.

“If the bacteria represented in the [pathogenic] subtype are shown to play a pathogenic role in IBS, perhaps through their metabolic activity, this provides a target for new therapies and an intermediate [marker] by which to assess them,” they suggest.

In a linked editorial, Professor Peter Gibson and Dr Emma Halmos of Melbourne’s Monash University, describe the introduction and adoption of the FODMAP diet as “a major change in the management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) towards integrated care.

But while “an effective symptomatic therapy, [it’s] one that carries risks associated with exacerbating disordered eating, challenging nutritional adequacy and putatively inducing dysbiotic gut microbiota,” they added.

They point out some limitations of the research, including that FODMAP intake was poorly assessed, fibre intake,which can also influence the microbiome wasn’t reported and patient drop-out reduced the power of the study.

Nevertheless, the authors concluded that “the beauty of [the study] is not in its definitive nature, but that it enables the creation of feasible innovative hypotheses that can be examined by focused studies. Perhaps the FODMAP diet is not just a symptomatic therapy.” 

Source: BMJ

The Search for New Cancer Therapies Strikes Gold

Photo by Jingming Pan on Unsplash

The gold complex auranofin has traditionally been used for treating rheumatism but is also being evaluated as a one number of new cancer therapies. According to a study published in Redox Biology, molecules with the same inhibition effect have been discovered that have a more specific effect than auranofin and therefore may have greater potential as cancer therapies.

Auranofin (AF) is classed by the WHO (World Health Organization) as an anti-rheumatic agent and is an active component in the drug Ridaura. AF is also currently being assayed in a string of clinical trials as a possible cancer therapy. One reason for the researchers’ interest in AF is its ability to inhibit thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), a protein central to the thioredoxin system, which protects cells from oxidative stress in all mammals. 

However, TrxR also protects cancer cells, making cancer therapies less effective. Moreover, TrxR, which affects cellular growth and survival, is upregulated in certain forms of cancer.

“There’s a great deal of interest in the ability to inhibit the thioredoxin system in the treatment of cancer, but there’s a risk that healthy cells will also be damaged and killed,” says the study’s co-last author Elias Arnér, professor at the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics at Karolinska Institutet. “Our aim is for TrxR inhibitors to be as specific as possible.”

The researchers studied the effects of AF in mouse cancer cells (lung adenocarcinoma and melanoma) and compared them with other recently-developed TrxR-inhibiting molecules called TRi-1 and TRi-2 (thioredoxin reductase inhibitors 1 and 2). 

The study, which was based on new proteomic methods of analysing the entire set of proteins in cells, suggests that the TRi compounds are more specific in their effect than AF. The results show that AF causes very high levels of oxidative stress and has other effects that seem unrelated to the inhibition of TrxR. They also demonstrate that TRi-1 seems to be the most specific TrxR inhibitor so far.

“Our results can serve as an important blueprint for further studies of AF’s mechanism of action and side effects,” said the study’s other co-last author Roman Zubarev, professor at the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet. “Having now compared AF with the more specific molecules TRi-1 and TRi-2, we hope that our findings will contribute to the further development of TrxR inhibitors as anticancer drugs.”

Source: Karolinska Insitutet

Immunity to Other Coronaviruses Confers COVID Protection

Transmission electron micrograph of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles (gold) within endosomes of a heavily infected nasal Olfactory Epithelial Cell. Image captured at the NIAID Integrated Research Facility (IRF) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. Credit: NIAID

Researchers have discovered another component beside previous infection or vaccination that contributes to SARS-CoV-2 immunity – previous antibody responses to other, harmless coronaviruses. “People who have had strong immune responses to other human coronaviruses also have some protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection,” said Alexandra Trkola, head of the Institute of Medical Virology at University of Zurich.

The study, published in Nature Communication, used a specially developed assay to analyse antibody levels against four other human coronaviruses in 825 serum samples taken before  the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, as well as 389 samples from donors infected with the virus. Combining these analyses with computer-based models enabled the team to precisely predict how well the antibodies would bind to and neutralise invading viruses.

The researchers were able to demonstrate that people who caught SARS-CoV-2 had lower levels of antibodies against coronaviruses that cause common colds compared to uninfected people. In addition, people with high levels of antibodies against harmless coronaviruses were less likely to have been hospitalized after catching SARS-CoV-2. “Our study shows that a strong antibody response to human coronaviruses increases the level of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. So someone who has gained immunity to harmless coronaviruses is therefore also better protected against severe SARS-CoV-2 infections,” says Trkola. This type of immune response is referred to as cross-reactivity, and it also occurs with T cell responses,  the additional line of the immune system in the defense against infections.

People are only fully protected against SARS-CoV-2 shortly after they have recovered from an infection or have received an effective vaccination. This is when antibody levels against the virus are still very high. As these levels drop over time, infection is no longer prevented, but the immunological memory quickly reactivates the body’s defenses, the production of antibodies as well as the T cell defense. “Of course, immune responses targeting SARS-CoV-2 that are mounted by the memory cells are far more effective than cross-reactive responses. But even though the protection isn’t absolute, cross-reactive immune responses shorten the infection and reduce its severity. And this is exactly what is also achieved through vaccination, just much, much more efficiently,” said Trkola.

Whether cross-reactivity also works in the opposite direction is not yet known. “If SARS-CoV-2 immunity also offers some degree of protection from infection with other coronaviruses, we would be a significant step closer to achieving comprehensive protection against other coronaviruses, including any new variants,” the virologist explains. This idea is also supported by the fact that cross-reactive protection is not only based on antibodies, but very likely also on T cells.

Source: University of Zurich

Heart Failure Risk Further Increased by Aspirin Use

Aspirin may increase heart failure risk in at-risk people
Photo by Stephen Foster on Unsplash

Aspirin use is associated with a 26% higher risk of heart failure in people with at least one risk factor for it, according to a study published today in ESC Heart FailureRisk factors included smoking, obesity, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

“This is the first study to report that among individuals with a least one risk factor for heart failure, those taking aspirin were more likely to subsequently develop the condition than those not using the medication,” said study author Dr. Blerim Mujaj of the University of Freiburg, Germany. “While the findings require confirmation, they do indicate that the potential link between aspirin and heart failure needs to be clarified.”

The influence of aspirin on heart failure is controversial, and so the study sought to investigate its association with heart failure incidence in people with and without heart disease and assess whether it is related to a new heart failure diagnosis in at-risk individuals.

The analysis included 30 827 individuals at risk for developing heart failure who were enrolled from Western Europe and the US into the HOMAGE study. The definition of “at risk” included one or more of the following: smoking, obesity, hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Participants were aged 40 years and older and were free of heart failure at baseline. Aspirin use was recorded at enrolment and participants were classified as users or non-users. Participants were followed-up for the first incidence of fatal or non-fatal heart failure requiring hospitalisation.

Average participant age was 67, 34% were women, and at baseline, a total of 7,698 participants (25%) were taking aspirin. During the 5.3-year follow-up, 1330 participants developed heart failure.

The investigators assessed the association between aspirin use and incident heart failure after adjusting for factors including demographic variables, medical history and medication. Taking aspirin was independently associated with a 26% raised risk of a new heart failure diagnosis.

For consistency, the researchers repeated the analysis after matching aspirin users and non-users for heart failure risk factors. In this matched analysis, aspirin was associated with a 26% raised risk of a new heart failure diagnosis. After excluding patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, in 22 690 participants (74%) without cardiovascular disease, aspirin use was still associated with a 27% increased risk of incident heart failure.

Dr Mujaj noted that “this was the first large study to investigate the relationship between aspirin use and incident heart failure in individuals with and without heart disease and at least one risk factor. Aspirin is commonly used – in our study one in four participants were taking the medication. In this population, aspirin use was associated with incident heart failure, independent of other risk factors.”

He concluded that “large multinational randomised trials in adults at risk for heart failure are needed to verify these results. Until then, our observations suggest that aspirin should be prescribed with caution in those with heart failure or with risk factors for the condition.”

Source: European Society of Cardiology

NICD Issues COVID Increase Warning

Image by Quicknews

Over the past week, an increase in the 7-day moving average for new COVID cases and the percentage testing positive in Gauteng has been observed by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), particularly in Tshwane amongst 10–29 year olds.

Additionally, the NICD has recently identified a cluster amongst the 20–44 age group at an institute of higher education in Tshwane. “We are monitoring these trends to see if these increases persist,” comments NICD Acting Executive Director, Prof Adrian Puren. He continued, “Localised increases in case numbers (clusters) are not unexpected, however, it is hard to say whether the increases indicate the start of a widespread resurgence.”

The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants to a large extent drove previous waves: Beta in the second wave and Delta in the third wave. “Genomic sequencing in South Africa has, to date, not yet detected the emergence of any new variants which are making up an increasing proportion of the sequences,” Dr Puren added. Molecular sequencing has some inherent delays in processing, due to transport of samples and the time taken to process them. In spite of any possible new variants emerging in the future, the importance of non-pharmaceutical interventions remains unchanged and individuals are encouraged to wear masks, practice hand hygiene, maintain social distancing and to gather in well ventilated spaces.

At present the National Department of Health reports that 41% of adults in South Africa have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine, with 35% fully vaccinated. “It is difficult to predict the magnitude and timing of a potential COVID resurgence, however, we implore the unvaccinated to get the COVID vaccine, especially the elderly and those with comorbidities,” urged Dr Michelle Groome, Head of the Division of Public Health Surveillance and Response. She added that vaccination and prior infection confer good protection against developing severe disease, and while there might be an increase in future case numbers, the number of hospitalisations and deaths are expected to be less severe compared to prior waves.

“As the endemic endures, I would like to reassure the public that the NICD continues to acutely monitor trends in case numbers, positivity rates and hospitalisations,” Dr Puren concluded.

Source: NICD