Tag: 18/3/22

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease COVIDTags :

New ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Cardiovascular Sequelae of COVID

On By ModernMedia
Anatomical model of a human heart
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

The American College of Cardiology has issued an expert consensus decision pathway for the evaluation and management of adults with key cardiovascular consequences of COVID. The document discusses myocarditis and other types of myocardial involvement, patient-centred approaches for long COVID and guidance on resumption of exercise following COVID. The clinical guidance was published today in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

“The best means to diagnose and treat myocarditis and long COVID following SARS-CoV-2 infection continues to evolve,” said Ty Gluckman, MD, MHA, co-chair of the expert consensus decision pathway. “This document attempts to provide key recommendations for how to evaluate and manage adults with these conditions, including guidance for safe return to play for both competitive and non-competitive athletes.”

Myocarditis

Myocarditis is a condition defined by the presence of cardiac symptoms such as chest pain, an elevated cardiac troponin, and abnormal ECG, cardiac imaging and/or cardiac biopsy findings.

Although rare, myocarditis with COVID is more commonly seen in men, and since it is associated with a higher risk of cardiac complications, a proactive management plan should be in place. For mild or moderate myocarditis, hospitalisation is recommended to closely monitor for worsening symptoms, while undergoing follow-up testing and treatment. Patients with severe myocarditis should ideally be hospitalised at appropriately equipped centres.

Myocarditis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is also rare and the benefits outweigh the risks. It is most commonly seen in younger males (40.6 cases per million for ages 12–29). Although most cases of myocarditis following COVID mRNA vaccination are mild, it should be diagnosed and treated similarly to myocarditis following COVID infection.

Long COVID

Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), or long COVID, is reported by up to 10-30% of infected individuals. It is defined by a constellation of new, returning or persistent health problems experienced by individuals four or more weeks after COVID infection. While individuals with this condition may experience wide-ranging symptoms, tachycardia, exercise intolerance, chest pain and shortness of breath represent some of the symptoms that draw increased attention to the cardiovascular system.

The writing committee has proposed two terms to better understand potential aetiologies for those with cardiovascular symptoms:

PASC-CVD, or PASC-Cardiovascular Disease, refers to a broad group of cardiovascular conditions (including myocarditis) that manifest at least four weeks after COVID infection.

PASC-CVS, or PASC-Cardiovascular Syndrome, includes a wide range of cardiovascular symptoms without objective evidence of cardiovascular disease following standard diagnostic testing.

Generally, patients with long COVID and cardiovascular symptoms should undergo evaluation with laboratory tests, ECG, echocardiogram, ambulatory rhythm monitor and/or additional pulmonary testing based on the clinical presentation. Cardiology consultation is recommended for abnormal test results, with additional evaluation based on the suspected clinical condition (eg, myocarditis).

Because multiple factors likely underlie PASC-CVS, evaluation and management may be best driven by the predominant cardiovascular symptom(s). For those with tachycardia and exercise intolerance, increased bedrest and/or a decline in physical activity may trigger cardiovascular deconditioning with progressive worsening of symptoms.

“There appears to be a ‘downward spiral’ for long COVID patients. Fatigue and decreased exercise capacity lead to diminished activity and bedrest, in turn leading to worsening symptoms and decreased quality of life,” said Nicole Bhave, MD, co-chair of the expert consensus decision pathway. “The writing committee recommends a basic cardiopulmonary evaluation performed upfront to determine if further specialty care and formalized medical therapy is needed for these patients.”

For PASC-CVS patients with tachycardia and exercise intolerance, upright exercise (walking or jogging) should be replaced with recumbent or semi-recumbent exercise (rowing, swimming or cycling) to avoid worsening fatigue. Exercise intensity and duration should be low initially, with gradual increases in exercise duration over time. Transition back to upright exercise can be done as  symptoms improve. Additional interventions (increased salt and fluid intake, elevation of the head during sleep, support stockings) and pharmacological treatments (beta-blockers) should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Return to Play

Concerns arose about return to play for athletes after COVID due to observations of cardiac injury among some hospitalised COVID patients, along with uncertainty around cardiovascular sequelae after mild illness. However, data do not show a low prevalence of clinical myocarditis and no increase of cardiac events.

For athletes recovering from COVID with ongoing cardiopulmonary symptoms or those requiring hospitalisation with increased suspicion for cardiac involvement, further evaluation with triad testing (ECG, cardiac troponin and echocardiogram) should be performed. For those with abnormal test results, further evaluation with cardiac MRI should be considered. Individuals diagnosed with clinical myocarditis should abstain from exercise for three to six months.

Cardiac testing is not recommended for asymptomatic individuals following COVID infection. Individuals should abstain from training for three days to ensure that symptoms do not develop. For those with mild or moderate non-cardiopulmonary symptoms (fever, lethargy, muscle aches), training may resume after symptom resolution. For those with remote infection (≥ three months) without ongoing cardiopulmonary symptoms, a gradual increase in exercise is recommended without the need for cardiac testing.

Based on the low prevalence of myocarditis observed in competitive athletes with COVID-19, the authors note that these recommendations can be reasonably applied to high-school athletes (aged ≥ 14 years) along with adult recreational exercise enthusiasts. Future study is needed, however, to better understand how long cardiac abnormalities persist following COVID infection and the role of exercise training in long COVID.

Source: American College of Cardiology

Categories : Diet and Nutrition General InterestTags :

Financial Rewards are an Effective Weight Loss Motivator

On By ModernMedia
Bathroom scale
Photo by I Yunmai on Unsplash

A large scale weight loss programme conducted with Australia’s national science agency, CSIRO, has demonstrated that personal accountability coupled with financial rewards continue to be a key motivator for successful weight loss.

The report [PDF] analysed data from over 48 000 CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet members, more than triple the sample size from the original study in 2018. The authors found that those who successfully claimed the financial incentive offered by the programme, managed a 28% greater weight loss than those members who did not claim it.

Financial reward claimants lost an average of 6.2kg (or 6.7% of their starting body weight), versus the 4.8kg (or 5.2% of starting body weight) lost by those who did not claim the financial reward.

CSIRO Research Scientist and report author Dr Gilly Hendrie said the research was telling evidence of how taking personal accountability by engaging in self-monitoring behaviours promoted healthy weight loss.

“It is encouraging to see the results of our study support other psychology and behavioural change research that self-accountability and financial incentives can have a meaningful impact on people’s weight loss success,” Dr Hendrie said. 

“Breaking unhealthy habits that have developed over a long time can be hard and it is easy to lose motivation if you are not seeing immediate results on the scales.

“We’ve found self-accountability activities like tracking your weight and taking progress photos can be positive for members to see the physical changes from one week to the next; it can give them the drive to stay on track and continue to form the healthy habits which will help them achieve their health goals,” she said.

In addition, two thirds of members who claimed the reward lost a clinically relevant amount of weight, more than 5% of their starting body weight, compared to half of the non-rewarded members.

“A five per cent reduction in body weight is proven to markedly lower the risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease and improve metabolic function in obese and overweight people,” Dr Hendrie said.

Programme participant Brian Thomas said he believes the refund reward was key to his 27 kg weight loss.

“The refund reward was not only a key motivator to me signing up, but it helped me achieve my weight loss goals and regain my health because it sets up the framework to do things you need to do to be successful,” Mr Thomas said.

“If I didn’t have to track my food for the refund reward, maybe I would never have got into the habit of tracking. Even now, three months after I received my refund, I’m still keeping up those behaviours. It’s allowed me to make positive changes to my own life and habits, and it has had a positive impact on my family.  Best of all it didn’t cost me a cent.”

The CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet offers a financial reward equal to the cost of the program (AUS $199/R2 200) for people who complete the 12-week programme and follow the science-based criteria to make lifestyle changes for long-term weight loss. The criteria include weekly weigh-ins, uploading a photo to track progress, and using a food diary at least three times per week.

Source: CSIRO

Categories : GastrointestinalTags :

Damaging Candida Strains in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

On By ModernMedia
Anatomy of the gut
Source: Pixabay CC0

In the human gut, individual strains of Candida albicans are incredibly varied, and some C. albicans strains may damage the gut of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), according to a new study published in Nature. The findings suggest a possible way to tailor treatments to individual patients in the future.

The researchers used an array of techniques to study Candida strains from the colons of people with or without ulcerative colitis, a chronic, relapsing and remitting inflammatory disorder of the colon and rectum and one of the main forms of IBD. They found that certain strains, which they call “high-damaging,” produce candidalysin, a potent toxin that damages immune cells.

“Such strains retained their “high-damaging” properties when they were removed from the patient’s gut and triggered pro-inflammatory immunity when colonised in mice, replicating certain disease hallmarks,” said senior author Dr Iliyan Iliev, an associate professor of immunology in medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine.

IBD is estimated to affect between one in 11 and one in 26 people worldwide. The condition can significantly impact patients’ quality of life. There are a handful of available therapies, but treatments may not always be effective. The study showed that steroids, one of the common treatments, may not work. Treating mice with steroids to suppress intestinal inflammation failed in the presence of “high-damaging” C. albicans strains.

“Our findings suggest that C. albicans strains do not cause spontaneous intestinal inflammation in a host with intact immunity,” Dr Iliev said. “But they do expand in the intestines when inflammation is present and can be a factor that influences response to therapy in our models and perhaps in patients.”

Most studies of the human microbiome in healthy individuals and those with IBD have focused on bacteria and viruses, but recent studies  by Dr Iliev and others has highlighted the role of fungi. Intestinal fungi play an important role in regulating immunity at surfaces exposed to the outside, such as the intestines and lungs, due to their potent immune-stimulating characteristics. While the mycobiota – the body’s fungi community – has been linked to IBD, the pro-inflammatory of gut the mycobiota was not understood.

In the new study, the investigators initially found that Candida strains, while highly diverse in the intestines of both patients with and without colitis, were on average more abundant in the patients with IBD. But that did not explain disease outcomes in individual patients. So, the investigators set out to identify the characteristics of these strains that cause damage and how they relate to individual patients.

The researchers observed that in the patients with ulcerative colitis, severe disease was associated with the presence of “high-damaging” Candida strains, all of which produce the candidalysin toxin. The scientists showed that the toxin damages immune cells called macrophages, prompting a storm of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β.

The researchers then grew macrophages in the presence of Candida strains and found that the ability of the strains to induce IL-1β corresponded closely to the severity of colitis in the patients.

“Our finding shows that a cell-damaging toxin candidalysin released by “high damaging” C. albicans strains during the yeast-hyphae morphogenesis triggers pathogenic immunological responses in the gut,” said first author Dr Xin Li.

Experiments in mice delineated that candidalysin-producing “high-damaging” strains induced the expansion of a population of T cells called Th17 cells and other inflammation-associated immune cells, such as neutrophils.

“Neutrophils contribute to tissue damage and their accumulation is a hallmark of active IBD,” said Dr Ellen Scherl, a professor of inflammatory bowel disease. “The indication that these processes might in part be driven by a fungal toxin released by yeast strains in specific patients could potentially inform personalized treatment approaches.”

Consistent with this finding, blocking IL-1β signalling had a dramatic effect in reducing colitis signs in mice that harboured these highly pro-inflammatory strains. The researchers noted that other recent studies have linked IBD to IL-1β in a general way, prompting ongoing investigations of drugs targeting related pathways as potential IBD therapies.

“We do not know whether specific strains are acquired by specific patients during the course of disease or whether they have been always there and become a problem during episodes of active disease” Dr Iliev said. “Nevertheless, our findings highlight a mechanism by which commensal fungal strains can turn against their host and overdrive inflammation.”

The team’s next steps are to investigate the persistence candidalysin-producing strains in the inflamed colon of specific IBD patients, as well as ways to choose patients for mycobiome therapy.

Source: Weill Cornell Medicine

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

Blood Pressure Rise on Standing up Linked to Cardiovascular Risk

On By ModernMedia
Blood pressure cuff
BP cuff for home monitoring, Source: Pixabay

Among young and middle-aged adults with high blood pressure, a substantial rise in blood pressure upon standing may identify those with a higher risk of serious cardiovascular events, such as heart attack and stroke, according to new research published in the journal Hypertension.

“This finding may warrant starting blood-pressure-lowering treatment including medicines earlier in patients with exaggerated blood pressure response to standing,” said Professor Paolo Palatini, MD, lead author of the study.

Blood pressure usually falls slightly upon standing up. In this study, researchers assessed whether the opposite response – a significant rise in systolic blood pressure upon standing – is a risk factor for heart attack and other serious cardiovascular events.

Researchers recruited 1207 people aged 18-45 years old with untreated stage 1 hypertension, from the ongoing HARVEST study which started in 1990. Stage 1 hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure of 140–159 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP 90–100 mm Hg. None had taken blood pressure-lowering medication prior to the study, and all were initially classed as low risk for major cardiovascular events based on lifestyle and medical history.

The researchers took six blood pressure measurements in various physical positions, including when lying down and after standing up. The 120 participants with the highest rise (top 10%) in blood pressure upon standing averaged an 11.4mmHg increase; all increases in this group were greater than 6.5mmHg. Remaining participants averaged a 3.8mmHg fall in systolic blood pressure upon standing.

The researchers compared heart disease risk factors, laboratory measures and the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (heart attack, heart-related chest pain, stroke, aneurysm of the aortic artery, clogged peripheral arteries) and chronic kidney disease among participants in the two groups. In some analyses, the development of atrial fibrillation, an arrhythmia that is a major risk factor for stroke, was also noted. Results were adjusted for age, gender, parental history of heart disease, and several lifestyle factors and measurements taken during study enrolment.

During an average 17-year follow-up, there were 105 major cardiovascular events among the participants. The most common were heart attack, heart-related chest pain and stroke.

People in the top 10% for rise in blood pressure:

  • had nearly twice the risk for a major cardiovascular event compared to the others;
  • did not generally have a higher risk profile for cardiovascular events during their initial evaluation (outside of the exaggerated blood pressure response to standing);
  • were more likely to be smokers (32.1% vs 19.9% in the non-rising group), yet physical activity levels were comparable, and they were not more likely to be overweight or obese, and no more likely to have a family history of cardiovascular events;
  • had more favourable cholesterol levels (lower total cholesterol and higher high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol);
  • had lower systolic blood pressure when lying down than the other group (140.5 mm Hg vs. 146.0 mm Hg, respectively), yet blood pressure measures were higher when taken over 24 hours.

After adjusting for average blood pressure taken over 24 hours, an exaggerated blood pressure response to standing remained an independent predictor of adverse heart events or stroke.

“The results of the study confirmed our initial hypothesis – a pronounced increase in blood pressure from lying to standing could be prognostically important in young people with high blood pressure. We were rather surprised that even a relatively small increase in standing blood pressure (6-7 mm Hg) was predictive of major cardiac events in the long run,” said Prof Palatini.

In a subset who had stress hormones measured from 24-hour urine samples, the epinephrine/creatinine ratio was higher in the people with rising BP compared to non-risers (118.4 nmol/mol vs 77.0 nmol/mol, respectively).

“Epinephrine levels are an estimate of the global effect of stressful stimuli over the 24 hours. This suggests that those with the highest blood pressure when standing may have an increased sympathetic response to stressors,” said Prof Palatini. “Overall, this causes an increase in average blood pressure.”

“The findings suggest that blood pressure upon standing should be measured in order to tailor treatment for patients with high blood pressure, and potentially, a more aggressive approach to lifestyle changes and blood-pressure-lowering therapy may be considered for people with an elevated blood pressure response to standing,” he said.

Source: American Heart Association

Categories : NeurologyTags :

Experiments to Test Consciousness All Fall Short

On By ModernMedia
Depiction of a human brain
Image by Fakurian Design on Unsplash

A study examining various experiments each designed to prove one of four conflicting theories of consciousness has discovered that they are all flawed: predetermined to prove the theory they are designed to test. The surprising conclusion is that the nature of the experiment largely determines its result.

In neuroscience, there are currently four leading theories trying to explain how the experience of consciousness emerges from neural activity. In this unique study, researchers re-examined hundreds of experiments that support contradictory theories.

The study, published in Nature Human Behaviour, shows that the inconsistencies in the experiments’ findings are mainly due to methodological differences or the methodological choices made by the researchers, predetermines their results.

Employing artificial intelligence, researchers re-examined 412 experiments, and found that scientists’ methodological choices actually determined the result of the experiment – so much so that an algorithm could predict which theory they were designed to support with 80% success.

Professor Liad Mudrik led the study. He explained: “The big question is how consciousness is born out of activity in the brain, or what distinguishes between conscious processing and unconscious processing,” Prof Mudrik explained. “For example, if I see a red rose, my visual system processes the information and reports that there is a red stimulus in front of me. But what allows me – unlike a computer for example – to experience this colour? To know how it feels? In recent years, a number of neuroscientific theories have been proposed to explain how conscious experience arises from neural activity. And although the theories provide utterly different explanations, each of them was able to gather empirical evidence to justify itself, based on multiple experiments that were conducted. We re-examined all these experiments, and showed that the parameters of the experiment actually determine its results. The artificial intelligence we used knew how to predict with an 80% success rate which theory the experiment would support, based solely on the researchers’ methodological choices.”

The study of consciousness has four leading theories, with contradicting predictions about the neural underpinnings of conscious experience. The Global Neuronal Workspace Theory maintains that there is a central neural network, and when information enters it, it is being broadcasted throughout the brain, becoming conscious. The Higher Order Thought Theory claims that there is a higher order neural state that ‘points’ at activity in lower-level areas, marking this content as conscious. A third theory, called Recurrent Processing Theory, claims that information that is reprocessed within the sensory areas themselves, in the form of recurrent processing, becomes conscious. And finally, a fourth theory – Integrated Information Theory – defines consciousness as integrated information in the brain, claiming that the posterior regions are the physical substrates of consciousness.

“Each of these theories offers convincing experiments to support them, so the field is polarized, with no agreed-upon neuroscientific account of consciousness,” said Prof Mudrik.

In-depth analysis of all of the 412 experiments designed to test the four leading theories showed that they were constructed differently. For example, some experiments focused on different states of consciousness, such as a coma or a dream, and others studied changes in the content of consciousness of healthy subjects. Some experiments tested connectivity metrics were tested, and others did not. “Researchers make a series of decisions as they build their experiment, and we demonstrated that these decisions alone – without even knowing the results of the experiments – already predict which theory these experiments will support. That is, these theories were tested in different manners, though they try to explain the same phenomenon,” Prof Mudrik said.

“Another one of our findings was that the vast majority of the experiments we analysed supported the theories, rather than challenging them. There appears to be a built-in confirmation bias in our scientific praxis, though the philosopher of science Karl Popper said that science advances by refuting theories, not by confirming them,” added Prof. Mudrik. “Moreover, when you put together all of the findings that were reported in these experiments, it seems like almost the entire brain is involved in creating the conscious experience, which is not consistent with any of the theories. In other words, it would appear that the real picture is larger and more complex than any of the existing theories suggest. It would seem that none of them is consistent with the data, when aggregated across studies, and that the truth lies somewhere in the middle.”

Source: EurekAlert!