Category: Surgeries & Procedures

Better Outcomes with Bypass Surgery in Chronic Limb-threatening Ischaemia

Photo by Natanael Melchor on Unsplash

Performing open bypass surgery to restore circulation for people with a severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD) resulted in better outcomes for specific patients compared to a less-invasive procedure, according to findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

PAD is a condition in which blood flow to one or both legs is reduced by a buildup of fatty plaque in the arteries. One in 10 of patients with this condition develop a severe form of PAD called chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), a painful and debilitating condition that can lead to amputation if untreated. Up to about 22 million people worldwide have CLTI, which is also associated with an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and death.

“Given the projected rise in the number of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, it is critically important that we understand the full impact of our interventions for this disease,” said Matthew Menard, MD, a study author and associate professor of surgery and co-director of the endovascular surgery program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston. “These findings help do that and also can assist clinicians and caregivers in providing the best possible care to patients.”

The Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial is a landmark study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).

To compare effectiveness of two common treatments for CLTI, researchers enrolled 1830 adults who were planning to have revascularisation, a procedure used to restore blood flow in their blocked arteries, and who were eligible for both treatment strategies.

One treatment strategy was an open bypass surgery, in which blood is redirected around the blocked leg artery by using a segment of a healthy vein. The other strategy was an endovascular procedure, where a balloon is dilated and/or a stent is placed in the blocked segment of the artery to improve blood flow. To compare the surgical strategy to the less-invasive endovascular approach, researchers randomised participants into one of two parallel trials between 2014–2021.

The first trial, defined as cohort 1, included 1434 adults who were judged to be the best candidates for the bypass surgery because they had an adequate amount of an optimal vein (the single-segment great saphenous vein) preferred for the procedure. Participants were then randomly assigned to have either a surgical bypass or endovascular procedure. Researchers followed the trial participants for up to seven years.

The second trial, defined as cohort 2, included 396 adults who were not the best candidates for the open bypass because they did not have an adequate amount of the preferred saphenous vein. They were randomised to have either an endovascular procedure or a bypass that used alternate graft material instead of the saphenous vein. Participants were followed-up for up to three years.

At the end of the trial, the researchers found that participants in cohort 1 who received the bypass were 32% less likely to have major medical events related to CLTI than those who had an endovascular procedure. This result was driven by a 65% reduction in major repeat surgeries or procedures to retain blood flow in the lower leg and a 27% reduction in major amputations. No differences were found in death rates between the participants who received the bypass surgery and those who received an endovascular procedure.

Adults in cohort 2 – those who did not have the optimal vein for the bypass – had no major differences in outcomes based on having had an open bypass or an endovascular procedure.

“Our findings support complementary roles for these two treatment strategies and emphasise the need for preprocedural planning to assess patients and inform what treatment is selected,” said co-principal investigator Alik Farber, MD, at Boston Medical Center.

Common symptoms of CLTI include leg and foot pain, foot infections, and open sores on the leg and foot that don’t fully heal. Without having a procedure to redirect or open blocked blood flow to the lower body, about 4 in 10 adults with CLTI have a lower leg or foot amputation.

BEST-CLI is the largest CLTI clinical trial to date and builds on prior research that aims to answer questions about the risks and benefits of revascularisation strategies for CLTI.

Source: NIH/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute

Pair of Studies Reveal Ways to Improve Surgical Care in Countries like South Africa

Photo by Natanael Melchor on Unsplash

Surgical care experts published two important studies in The Lancet that will help to provide safer surgery for thousands of patients around the world – particularly in Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMIC) such as South Africa.

Researchers found that routinely changing gloves and instruments just before closing wounds could significantly reduce Surgical Site Infection (SSI), the most common post-operative complication. This switch could prevent as many as 1 in 8 cases of SSI.

Secondly, they tested a new toolkit that can make hospitals better prepared for pandemics, heatwaves, winter pressures and natural disasters that could reduce cancellations of planned procedures around the world.

Surgical infections

Patients in LMICs are disproportionately affected by wound infections. The ChEETAh trial was run in Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda and South Africa. With the publication of their findings in The Lancet, researchers are calling for the practice to be widely implemented – particularly in LMICs.

Co-author Mr Aneel Bhangu, from the University of Birmingham, commented: “Surgical site infection is the world’s most common postoperative complication – a major burden for both patients and health systems. Our work demonstrates that routine change of gloves and instruments is not only deliverable around the world, but also reduced infections in a range of surgical settings. Taking this simple step could reduce SSIs by 13% – simply and cost-effectively.”

Patients who develop SSI experience pain, disability, poor healing with risk of wound breakdown, prolonged recovery times and psychological challenges. In health systems where patients have to pay for treatment this can be a disaster and increases the risk of patients being plunged into poverty after their treatment. The simple and low-cost practice of changing your gloves and instruments just before closing the wound is something which can be done by surgeons in any hospital around, meaning a huge potential impact.

Surgical Preparedness Index

Experts from the NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global Surgery also unveiled their ‘Surgical Preparedness Index’ (SPI) in The Lancet. This is a key study assessing the extent to which hospitals around the world were able to continue elective surgery during COVID.

Researchers identified different features of hospitals that made them more or less ‘prepared’ for times of increased pressure. Using COVID as an important example, they highlighted that health systems are put under stress for all sorts of reasons each year – from seasonal pressures to natural disasters, and warfare. A team of clinicians from 32 countries designed the SPI which scores hospitals based on their infrastructure, equipment, staff, and processes used to provide elective surgery. The higher the resulting SPI score, the more prepared a hospital is for disruptions.

After creating the SPI tool, the experts asked 4714 clinicians in 1632 hospitals across 119 countries to assess the preparedness of their local surgical department. Overall most hospitals around the world were poorly prepared, and suffered a big drop in the number of procedures they were able to provide during COVID. A 10-point increase in the SPI score corresponded to four more patients that had surgery per 100 patients on the waitlist.

Lead author Mr. James Glasbey, from the University of Birmingham, commented: “Our new tool will help hospitals internationally improve their preparation for external stresses ranging from pandemics to heatwaves, winter pressures and natural disasters. We believe it help hospitals to get through their waiting lists more quickly, and prevent further delays for patients. The tool can be completed easily by healthcare workers and managers working in any hospital worldwide – if used regularly, it could protect hospitals and patients against future disruptions.”

Professor Dion Morton, Barling Chair of Surgery at the University of Birmingham and Director of Clinical Research at the Royal College of Surgeons of England commented: “Although not all postoperative deaths are avoidable, many can be prevented by increasing investment in research, staff training, equipment, and better hospital facilities. We must invest in improving the quality of surgery around the world.”

Source: University of Birmingham

NASA Technology Enables Nearly Painless Kidney Stone Removal

Anatomic model of a kidney
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

A new ultrasonic technique developed for emergency kidney stone treatments on Mars may offer an option to move kidney stones out of the ureter with minimal pain and no anaesthesia, according to a new feasibility study published in The Journal of Urology.

In the procedure, the physician uses a handheld transducer placed on the skin to direct ultrasound waves towards the stone. Using ultrasound propulsion, the stones can then moved and repositioned to promote their passage, while burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) can break up the stone.

Unlike with the standard technique of shock wave lithotripsy, there is minimal pain according to lead author Dr M. Kennedy Hall, a UW Medicine emergency medicine doctor. “It’s nearly painless, and you can do it while the patient is awake, and without sedation, which is critical.”

The researchers hope that one day the procedure of moving or breaking up the stones could eventually be performed in a clinic or emergency room setting with this technology, Dr Hall added.

Ureteral stones can cause severe pain and are a common reason for emergency department visits. Most patients with ureteral stones are advised to wait to see if the stone will pass on its own. However, this observation period can last for weeks, with nearly one-fourth of patients eventually requiring surgery, Dr Hall noted.

Dr Hall and colleagues evaluated the new technique to meet the need for a way to treat stones without surgery.

The study was designed to test the feasibility of using the ultrasonic propulsion or using BWL to break up stones in awake, unanaesthetised patients, Dr Hall said.

The study recruited 29 patients; 16 received propulsion and 13 received propulsion and BWL. In 19 patients, the stones moved. In two cases, the stones moved out of the ureter and into the bladder.

Burst wave lithotripsy fragmented the stones in seven of the cases. At a two-week follow up, 18 of 21 patients (86%) whose stones were located lower in the ureter, closer to the bladder, had passed their stones. In this group, the average time to stone passage was about four days, the study noted.

One of these patients felt “immediate relief” when the stone was dislodged from the ureter, the study stated.

The next step would a clinical trial with a control group, which would not receive either BWL bursts or ultrasound propulsion, to evaluate the degree to which this new technology potentially aids stone passage, Dr Hall said.

Development of this technology first started five years ago, when NASA funded a study to see if kidney stones could be moved or broken up, without anaesthesia, on long space flights, such as the Mars missions. The technology has worked so well that NASA has downgraded kidney stones as a key concern.

“We now have a potential solution for that problem,” Dr Hall said.

Source: University of Washington School of Medicine/UW Medicine

Troponin Levels Help Inform When to Perform Surgery after Heart Attack

Photo by Natanael Melchor on Unsplash

New research from a large study published in the International Journal of Cardiology shows that timing of surgery for some heart attack patients can be improved by analysing troponin levels.

Troponin is a protein involved in muscle contraction that is released into the bloodstream after heart attack, with higher levels indicating more heart damage. Troponin levels help clinicians to determine whether a patient is having a heart attack, or myocardial infarction (MI), and to decide on treatment options such as coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

The optimal time to perform surgery following an MI remains unclear. Previous reports have suggested that carrying out surgery in the first few days following an MI is associated with a higher risk of surgical complications and death by not leaving time for the heart to recover. As a result, following an MI, many patients who need bypass surgery wait for more than 10 days before surgery is performed.

Researchers in this study found that some patients who have lower levels of troponin would benefit from having earlier surgery. However, the researchers show that patients with very high troponin levels should have surgery postponed, as their risk of dying was higher if surgery was performed within 10 days of their MI.

There was no benefit in delaying surgery for those with low levels of troponin, according to the study.

Early surgery for MI patients

The researchers suggest that early surgery for MI patients with lower troponin levels would reduce overall length of stay and ease pressure on resources such as staff.

This is the first multicentre study to investigate the interaction between the extent of heart damage, as indicated by troponin levels, and the optimal time to wait for surgery in a large series of MI patients. 

Dr Amit Kaura, lead author of the research, said: “The approach on the safest time to operate on patients following a heart attack varies in hospitals across the UK. Our study could help clinicians make more informed decisions on the best treatment plans for heart attack patients requiring surgery, based on their levels of troponin. It could also lead to a more standardised approach in the NHS on how we treat this patient group, leading to resources being used effectively, shorter stays and improved outcomes for patients.”

The study reviewed patients who had a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) due to a blockage to their coronary arteries who required a CABG.

About 20% of NSTEMI patients have a CABG. The optimal timing for CABG surgery in patients with uncomplicated NSTEMI has been unclear. Prior to the new research, some studies had suggested that early surgery was associated with higher mortality post operation. This has led to a tendency for CABG to be delayed if a patient’s condition remains stable. However, other studies had reported similar mortality rates after early versus late surgery, concluding that delaying surgery in all patients after uncomplicated NSTEMI is not warranted and does not improve outcomes. No previous study had investigated in a large group of patients whether there was an association between the extent of heart damage (as measured by troponin levels) and the wait for surgery on survival.

Heart data insights

The team analysed data from the NIHR HIC of 1746 patients with NSTEMI and unstable angina (UA) where insufficient cardiac blood supply leads to an MI. The cohort consisted of 1684 patients with NSTEMI and 62 with UA. The average age of the group was 69 and 21% were female. They underwent CABG within 90 days at one of five cardiac centres before their surgery between 2010 and 2017. 

The researchers compared patients’ troponin levels, wait between surgery and outcomes after surgery within the first 30 days and over a period of five years. Pre-operative troponin level strongly predicted early mortality, and this was significantly influenced by the interval to surgery. The average wait for patients with high troponin levels to surgery was nine days. Sixty patients died within 30 days after surgery and another 211 patients died over a period of five years following surgery. They found that for those who had troponin levels of less than 100 times the normal upper limit, delaying surgery to after 10 days was not associated with lower survival. For patients with higher troponin levels, early survival increased progressively with a longer time to surgery – survival was highest in those who had surgery after day 10. 

Dr Amit Kaura said: “For patients with troponin levels of under 100 times the normal upper limit, extending the waiting time or surgery did not improve early survival. This finding is particularly significant as two-thirds of patients presenting with troponin levels of under 100 are waiting on average 12 days for surgery after being admitted to hospital. There are potential cost saving implications with our research by performing earlier surgery in this group of patients with lower troponin levels”.

The effect of troponin levels pre-operation on survival was limited to the first 30 days after surgery. Late survival was determined by other risk factors, such as age and other co-morbidities such as hypertension.

Further studies are needed in the form of prospective trials to assess the impact of troponin and timing of surgery on survival following a heart attack, the researchers say.

Source: Imperial College London

Remove All Secondary Kidney Stones, Study Suggests

Anatomic model of a kidney
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

A new study showed, during kidney stone removal procedures, leaving small asymptomatic stones behind significantly increases the risk of a patient’s relapse in the following five years. The study findings appear in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Typically, stones < 6mm in diameter that are not a procedure’s primary target are not removed but monitored, since ‘secondary’ stones have high rates of successful passage if they move into the ureter, explained Dr Mathew Sorensen, a urologist at the University of Washington School of Medicine and the study’s lead author.

“Before this study, the clinical views were pretty mixed on whether some of these stones should be treated,” he said. “Most clinicians would decide, based on the size of the stone, whether it hit the bar for treatment, and if it did not, you would often ignore the little stones.”

The researchers studied 75 patients who were treated at multiple institutions over 2015 to 2021. About half of the patients had only their large primary stone treated, while the others had primary and secondary stones removed. Relapse was defined as having to go to the emergency room or undergo an additional procedure due to a recurrence or if a follow-up CT scan showed that the secondary stones grew.

Removal of the secondary stones reduced the relapse rate by 82%, the researchers found, leading the authors to recommend that smaller stones should not be left behind.

“Results of our trial support the removal of small asymptomatic renal stones at the time of surgery with a larger stone,” their paper concluded. The authors noted that while removal of smaller stones could add to the procedure’s duration and cost, those costs would likely be less than those associated with a patient’s repeat procedure or visit to the emergency room. Some patients in the study visited the emergency department multiple times and then required surgery, the report noted.

Dr Sorensen said he would share the study results with colleagues with the hope of changing their sensibility toward smaller stones. Further study is needed to determine whether treatment of small stones alone is justified, as technology improves and the costs and risks of intervention diminish, he said.

“I think we have proven through this rigorous study that removal of the small asymptomatic stones is beneficial when feasible and in patients that are candidates to have all their stones treated in one procedure,” he noted. “Leaving the stones behind risk trouble in the future.”

Source: University of Washington School of Medicine/UW Medicine

Regenerating Muscles for Better Rotator Cuff Repair

Photo by Harlie Raethel on Unsplash

Researchers have pioneered a technique way to regenerate muscle that could help encourage muscle growth in damaged rotator cuff muscles and aid in their repair. Their findings are available to read online in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Tears of the major tendons in the shoulder joint, commonly called the rotator cuff, are common injuries in adults. Improved rotator cuff repairs are now possible with surgical advances, though failure rates with surgery can still be high.  Now, a team of researchers from the UConn School of Medicine led by surgeon, engineer and scientist Dr Cato T. Laurencin reported that a graphene/polymer matrix embedded into shoulder muscle can prevent re-tear injuries.

“Most repairs focus on the tendon,” and how to reattach it to the bone most effectively, Laurencin says. “But the real problem is that the muscle degenerates and accumulates fat. With a tear, the muscle shrinks, and the body grows fat in that area instead. When the tendon and muscle are finally reattached surgically to the shoulder bone, the weakened muscle can’t handle normal stresses and the area can be re-injured again.

The researchers developed a polymer mesh infused with nanoplatelets of graphene. When they used it to repair the shoulders of rats who had chronic rotator cuff tears with muscle atrophy, the muscle grew back. When they tried growing muscle on the mesh in a petri dish in the lab, they found the material seemed to encourage the growth of myotubes, precursors of muscle, and discourage the formation of fat.

“This is really a potential breakthrough treatment for tears of the rotator cuff. It addresses the real problem: muscle degeneration and fat accumulation,” Dr Laurencin said.

The next step in their work is studying the matrix in a large animal. The team looks forward to developing the technology in humans.

Source: University of Connecticut

Aspirin and Antiplatelets after Coronary Artery Grafts are a Double-edged Sword

Source: Wikimedia Commons CC0

A new analysis published in JAMA shows that a combination of aspirin and another antiplatelet agent can prevent clotting after coronary artery bypass grafts but also increases the risk of potentially dangerous bleeding. This double-edged finding from investigators suggests physicians should carefully weigh the use of these medications after this procedure.

A Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian team led by Dr Mario Gaudino, a coronary artery bypass surgeon, examined data from 1668 grafts in which surgeons use a saphenous vein graft to circumvent blocked coronary arteries. It is common for blood clots to form within the grafted vein, for which patients are typically given aspirin. Some evidence suggests that aspirin along with a prescription strength antiplatelet agent such as ticagrelor can more effectively prevent this clotting.

“We found that, yes, this dual therapy significantly reduces the risk that the grafts will fail. However, for the first time, we have shown that this approach also carries a significant risk of clinically important bleeding,” said Dr Gaudino. “So, the benefit comes at a price.”

Taken together, these results indicate physicians should base their decisions on patients’ individual circumstances and avoid using this approach for those with conditions that put them at risk of bleeding, he said.

In more than 90% of coronary artery bypass grafts, surgeons take a graft from one of the patient’s saphenous veins, which return blood up the leg. However, within a year, up to a quarter of these grafts become obstructed.

While studies have examined the benefit of aspirin and ticagrelor, known as dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), these studies were small and had conflicting conclusions. The team contacted researchers on four such trials to obtain access to their raw data. They aggregated the data and effectively created a much larger study capable of generating more robust conclusions.

They found a failure rate of approximately 11% in patients who received a combination of aspirin and ticagrelor, while blockages occurred in 20% of grafts when patients received only aspirin. However, compared to aspirin alone, DAPT brought on more bleeding events that, while generally not life threatening, required medical attention.

In these previous trials, patients received DAPT for a full year. However, most graft failure occurs in the first few months after surgery. Dr Gaudino plans a further test of aspirin and ticagrelor over one to three months to see if a shortened course offers the same benefit with less risk of bleeding.

Source: Weill Cornell Medicine

Post-operative AF Linked to Risk of Hospitalisation for Heart Failure

Associations between post-operative atrial fibrillation and incident heart failure hospitalisations. Credit: European Heart Journal

A study of over three million patients found that people who develop an atrial fibrillation (AF) after undergoing surgery have an increased risk of subsequent hospitalisation for heart failure.

The study, which is published in the European Heart Journal, showed that the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure among patients who developed AF after surgery increased regardless of whether or not the surgery was for a heart condition.

Among 76 536 patients who underwent heart surgery, 18.8% developed post-operative AF and the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure increased by a third compared to patients who did not develop AF. Among 2 929 854 patients without a history of heart disease who had surgery for non-heart-related conditions, 0.8% developed AF and the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure doubled.

The study’s first author, Dr Parag Goyal, Associate Professor of Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine, said: “Our study, which to our knowledge is the largest study to date, shows that post-operative atrial fibrillation is associated with future heart failure hospitalisations. This could mean that atrial fibrillation is an important indicator of underlying but not yet detected heart failure; or it could mean that atrial fibrillation itself contributes to the future development of heart failure. While this study could not specifically address which of these mechanisms are at play, our hope is that this study will inspire future work into exploring the underlying mechanism seen in our important findings.

“Regardless of the mechanism, our study shows that post-operative atrial fibrillation is clearly an important entity that merits attention and incorporation into decision making. Most importantly, patients and doctors need to be more vigilant about heart failure symptoms among patients who develop post-operative atrial fibrillation. Those who do develop the condition may require more aggressive treatments for other risk factors for heart failure, such as high blood pressure, diabetes and narrowing of the arteries.”

Post-operative AF occurs in up to 40% of patients undergoing heart surgery and 2% of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Doctors have tended to view it as a benign event, triggered by the stress of the surgery – but evidence is emerging that post-operative AF is linked to longer term problems such as stroke and death from any cause. Until now, there has been limited evidence regarding its association with subsequent heart failure.

For the current, retrospective study, the researchers collected data on hospital health claims from 2016 to 2018, adjusting for factors that could affect the results such as age, sex, race, insurance status, medical history and body mass index.

Study limitations include its observational nature which can only establish association, not causation. The study relies on administrative claims data and medical codes to identify medical conditions; it lacks more detailed information like management strategies for post-operative AF, and on the function and size of the left ventricle, which could affect the likelihood of developing AF.

The researchers hope to conduct further studies to understand the underlying mechanism and to investigate ways of preventing future hospitalisations for heart failure among patients who develop post-operative AF.

The researchers wrote in the conclusion that “In the meantime, clinicians should be aware that POAF [post-operative AF] may be a harbinger of HF.”

In an accompanying editorial, Dr Melissa Middeldorp and Professor Christine Albert, both from the Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, California, USA, write: “These data add to a growing body of literature suggesting that POAF is not just a transient response to surgery but may be reflective of underlying atrial and myocardial structural changes that not only predispose to the acute AF event but to other potentially related adverse cardiovascular events, such as HF hospitalisation.”

They write that further studies are needed for a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in placing people at greater risk of AF and post-operative heart failure is needed in order to reduce hospitalisation and deaths after surgery.

“With a greater understanding of patients’ full risk factor profile, we may advocate for early aggressive intervention at the initial manifestation of POAF, to improve outcomes and reduce rehospitalisation following cardiac and non-cardiac surgery,” they concluded.

Source: European Society of Cardiology

AI-enabled Kidney Surgery Makes it Easier for Novice Surgeons

Anatomic model of a kidney
Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an efficient surgical intervention for removing large kidney stones. However, it is a challenging procedure that requires years of training to perform. To address this, a group of scientists from the Nagoya City University, developed and trialled an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled robotic device for assisting surgeons in PCNL.

Creating a renal access from the skin on the back to the kidney is a crucial yet challenging step in PCNL. A poorly performed renal access can lead to severe complications including massive bleeding, thoracis and bowel injuries, renal pelvis perforation, or even sepsis. This procedure takes years of training to master. The two main renal access methods for PCNL – X-ray guidance and ultrasound (US) guidance deliver similar postoperative outcomes but require experience-based expertise.

Many technologies are being developed to bridge this skill gap. This inspired a Nagoya University research team to question if artificial intelligence (AI)-powered robotic devices could be used for improved guidance compared with conventional US guidance. Specifically, they wanted to see if the AI-powered device called the Automated Needle Targeting with X-ray (ANT-X), which was developed by the Singaporean medical start-up, NDR Medical Technology, offers better precision in percutaneous renal access along with automated needle trajectory.

The team performed a randomised, single-blind, controlled trial comparing their robotic-assisted fluoroscopic-guided (RAF) method with US-guided PCNL. The results of this trial were detailed in the The Journal of Urology. “This was the first human study comparing RAF with conventional ultrasound guidance for renal access during PCNL, and the first clinical application of the ANT-X ,” said Dr Kazumi Taguchi, Assistant Professor at NCU.

The trial was conducted with 71 patients—36 in the RAF group and 35 in the US group. The primary outcome of the study was single puncture success, with stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, parameters measured during renal access, and fluoroscopy time as secondary outcomes.

The single puncture success rate was ~34 and 50% in the US and RAF groups, respectively. Fewer needle punctures were needed in the RAF group (1.82 times) as opposed to the US group (2.51 times). In 14.3% of US-guided cases, the resident was unable to obtain renal access due to procedural difficulty, prompting a surgeon change. However, none of the RAF cases faced this issue. The median needle puncture duration was also significantly shorter in the RAF group (5.5 minutes vs 8.0 minutes). No significant differences in the other secondary outcomes was found.

Multiple renal accesses during PCNL are directly linked to postoperative complications including, decreased renal function. Therefore, the low needle puncture frequency and shorter puncture duration, as demonstrated by the ANT-X, may provide better long-term outcome for patients. While the actual PCNL was performed by residents in both RAF and US groups, the renal access was created by a single, novice surgeon in the RAF group, using ANT-X. This demonstrates the safety and convenience of the novel robotic device, which could possibly reduce surgeons’ training load and allow more hospitals to offer PCNL procedures.

Dr Taguchi commented, “The ANT-X simplifies a complex procedure, like PCNL, making it easier for more doctors to perform it and help more number of patients in the process. Being an AI-powered robotic technology, this technique may pave the way for automating similar interventional surgeries that could shorten the procedure time, relieve the burden off of senior doctors, and perhaps reduce the occurrence of complications.”

Source: Nagoya City University

Bariatric Surgery Reduces Cancer Risks with Obesity

Obesity
Image source: Pixabay CC0

A study published in JAMA shows that weight loss through bariatric surgery for adults with obesity was associated with a 32% lower risk of developing cancer and a 48% lower risk of cancer-related death compared with those who did not have the surgery.

Rising obesity numbers are being seen all over the world. The International Agency for Research on Cancer describes 13 types of cancer as obesity-associated cancers such as endometrial cancer, postmenopausal breast cancer, and cancers of the colon, liver, pancreas, ovary and thyroid.

Lead author of the study, Ali Aminian, MD, at Cleveland Clinic, said that bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment for obesity. “Patients can lose 20 to 40% of their body weight after surgery, and weight loss can be sustained over decades. The striking findings of this study indicate that the greater the weight loss, the lower the risk of cancer,” said Dr Aminian.

From 2004 and 2017, the SPLENDID (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in Neoplastic Disease Incidence and Death) study matched a group of 5053 adult patients with obesity who had bariatric surgery 1:5 to a control group of 25 265 patients with obesity who did not undergo the surgery.

After 10 years, 2.9% of patients in the bariatric surgery group and 4.9% of patients in the non-surgical group developed an obesity-associated cancer.

After 10 years, 0.8% of patients in the surgery group and 1.4% of patients in the non-surgical group died from cancer, indicating that bariatric surgery is associated with a 48% lower cancer mortality risk.

Researchers noted that the benefits of bariatric surgery were seen in a wide range of study participants in terms of age, sex and race. In addition, benefits were similarly observed after both gastric bypass and gastric sleeve operations.

“According to the American Cancer Society, obesity is second only to tobacco as a preventable cause of cancer in the United States,” said the study’s senior author, Steven Nissen, MD, Chief Academic Officer of the Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute. “This study provides the best possible evidence on the value of intentional weight loss to reduce cancer risk and mortality.”

Numerous studies have shown the health benefits of bariatric or weight-loss surgery in patients with obesity. The Cleveland Clinic-led STAMPEDE study showed that following bariatric surgery, significant weight loss and control of type 2 diabetes last over time. The SPLENDOR study showed that in patients with fatty liver, bariatric surgery decreases the risk of the progression of liver disease and serious heart complications.

The SPLENDID study adds important findings to the literature focused on the link between obesity and cancer. Given the growing epidemic of obesity worldwide, these findings have considerable public health implications.

“Based on the magnitude of benefit shown in our study, weight loss surgery can be considered in addition to other interventions that can help prevent cancer and reduce mortality,” said Jame Abraham, M.D., chairman of the Hematology and Medical Oncology Department at Cleveland Clinic. “Further research needs to be done to understand the underlying mechanisms responsible for reduced cancer risk following bariatric surgery.”

Source: Cleveland Clinic