The drug sulthiame reduces the number of breathing pauses and improves sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, according to a European clinical study in which the University of Gothenburg played a significant role. The findings offer hope for a drug-based treatment for people who cannot tolerate CPAP breathing masks.
The study, published in The Lancet, included 298 patients with moderate to severe sleep apnoea. One quarter received a placebo, while the remaining participants were given sulthiame in different doses. The double-blind clinical trial was conducted in four European countries.
A possible breakthrough
The study found that patients receiving the higher doses of the drug had up to 47% fewer breathing interruptions and better oxygenation compared with those given placebo. Sulthiame works by stabilizing the body’s breathing control and increasing respiratory drive, thereby reducing the risk of the upper airway collapsing during sleep. Most side effects were mild and transient.
Jan Hedner, senior professor of pulmonary medicine at the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, has played a leading role in the study.
“We have been working on this treatment strategy for a long time, and the results show that sleep apnoea can indeed be influenced pharmacologically. It feels like a breakthrough, and we now look forward to larger and longer studies to determine whether the effect is sustained over time and whether the treatment is safe for broader patient groups,” says Jan Hedner.
Many struggle with CPAP
Sleep apnoea occurs when the upper airways collapse during sleep, causing repeated breathing pauses, oxygen deprivation, and disrupted sleep. Over time, untreated sleep apnoea increases the risk of high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes.
Although the condition is common, there is still no drug that treats the underlying cause. The standard treatment – continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) – is highly effective but difficult for many to tolerate. Up to half of all patients discontinue CPAP within a year, as the mask can feel uncomfortable or disturb sleep.
Sulthiame is an existing medication previously approved for treating a form of childhood epilepsy, and is now being evaluated for sleep apnoea.
While steroids like dexamethasone are used in certain tuberculosis cases (eg, TB meningitis), their impact on immune cells is not well understood. Given the renewed interest in the steroid dexamethasone, as a host-directed treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic, a Trinity College Dublin team provides evidence that treating patients with steroids may enhance the function of their macrophages to kill the mycobacteria, while diminishing pathways of inflammatory damage. The study is published now in the journal Scientific Reports.
The team’s goal was to determine whether dexamethasone impacts the macrophage’s ability to fight TB. Although glucocorticoids can reactivate TB,they are paradoxically the only adjunctive host-directed therapiesthat are recommended by the World Health Organization for TB. Steroids are given to patients alongside antimicrobials in certain circumstances, however, scientists don’t fully understand the effect of these drugs on the immune system, especially innate immune cells such as macrophages.
The researchers studied immune cells called macrophages derived from the blood of healthy volunteers or isolated from lung fluid donated by patients undergoing routine bronchoscopies. By treating and infecting these macrophages in the lab with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the scientists could examine and understand how dexamethasone affects the immune response that protects the lungs during infection.
Key findings from the study
Dexamethasone a potent glucocorticoid reduces glycolysis in human lung and blood derived macrophages. This reduces the amount of energy available in the cell.
Dexamethasone reduced the production of both pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines measured in the study, IL-1β, TNF, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10. Although helpful for immunity, limiting the production can also limit damage from excessive inflammation.
Mtb-infected macrophages have increased survival when they were treated with dexamethasone. This suggests that dexamethasone may protect macrophages from dying due to the harmful effects of infection or detrimental immune responses to infection.
Dexamethasone reduces bacterial burden in infected macrophages, and we have identified that this is at least partly mediated by autophagy and phagosomal acidification. Dexamethasone can enhance the macrophages’ ability to degrade and clear bacteria helping to overcome infection with Mtb.
This study identifies that macrophages from different sources have differential responses to glucocorticoids. This highlights that tissue origin can influence how macrophages react to drugs, which may be important for targeting treatment strategies. This is one of the first studies to show that dexamethasone can reduce inflammation while preserving or enhancing antimicrobial function in primary human lung macrophages infected with Mtb.
How could this research change a patient’s life?
The findings support the use of steroids as an extra therapy in conjunction with existing antimicrobial therapies in TB treatment, especially in cases with excessive inflammation. Steroids might also be useful with antimicrobials in TB preventative therapy, to reduce progression from latent TB infection to active TB disease. This study opens avenues for macrophage-targeted steroid therapies that balance inflammation control with antimicrobial defence.
For now, researchers hope this study will hasten the recovery of TB patients who experience debilitating symptoms, often for months into existing therapy.
Dr Donal Cox, Senior Research Fellow, Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin said:
“Our study shows that dexamethasone, which is known to dampen inflammation, can also help macrophages fight tuberculosis more effectively. This challenges the assumption that steroids always suppress immunity and opens the door to smarter, targeted adjunctive therapies that balance inflammation control with antimicrobial defence.”
Prof Joseph Keane, Professor of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin and Consultant Respiratory Physician, St James Hospital said:
“In clinical practice, steroids are the most under-used adjunctive therapy for TB. We often rely on steroids to manage inflammation in tuberculosis, particularly in severe forms like TB meningitis. What’s reassuring from this study, is that dexamethasone not only tempers inflammation but also appears to support the macrophage’s ability to control infection. This study provides new evidence to help us redefine steroid use in TB care—targeting inflammation without compromising antimicrobial defence.”
Next steps for this research
Developing steroid therapies that can be specifically targeted to lung macrophages via mechanisms such as inhaled nanoparticles might be an option to translating this into better therapy. The team also wants to identify how steroids altered different metabolic pathways in human lung macrophages and not in blood derived macrophages so they can exploit this to make steroid therapies better in the future.
A new project led by Oxford University aims to develop a novel breathing test that could detect asthma and COPD earlier, more accurately, and closer to home – reducing pressure on the NHS and improving outcomes for patients.
This work is included in a portfolio of research funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation, to make diagnostic testing more accessible by designing simple, affordable tools that can be used in everyday settings. The project, called ACCESS (A Community-based diagnostiC for early airwayS disease), focuses on airway diseases, and will receive £1.3 million over three years.
Chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affect more than half a billion people worldwide and cause over four million deaths every year. In the UK, these conditions hit disadvantaged communities hardest, with people in areas of socioeconomic deprivation facing particular challenges in accessing hospital-based diagnostic care.
A volunteer undertaking a computed cardiopulmonography based breath test. (The volunteer is Dr Nick Smith, a member of the research team developing the CCP technology). Credit: Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford.
Currently, asthma and COPD diagnosis relies on a test called spirometry. This measures how much air a person can forcefully breathe out, but it is difficult for many patients to perform and often fails to detect disease in its earliest stages. By the time spirometry picks up abnormalities, damage to the lungs is usually irreversible, resulting in late diagnoses, missed chances for early treatment, and poorer outcomes.
The project is enabled by the strong ethos for collaborative and innovative research in this University and will be delivered by a multi-disciplinary team, working across university departments and the NHS.
To address these issues, Oxford researchers have developed a new test, known as computed cardiopulmonography (CCP), that could transform the way lung diseases are diagnosed. CCP is performed while a patient breathes normally for 12 minutes through a mouthpiece linked to a highly accurate gas analyser. Using cutting-edge laser technology and advanced mathematical modelling, the test captures a detailed picture of how evenly air flows through the lungs. This “fingerprint” of lung function changes early in the course of disease, making CCP a powerful tool for spotting subtle problems that spirometry can miss.
Early studies in people with asthma, COPD, and even in otherwise healthy smokers suggest CCP is a highly sensitive marker of small airways damage. But while the results are promising, the test currently takes too long and requires specialist gas supplies, restricting its use to hospitals and research labs.
The goal of the ACCESS project is to adapt CCP for community use, for instance in GP surgeries, pharmacies, and community diagnostic hubs. Specifically, the research team will work to reduce the time duration and volume of gas needed for each test, and speed up the data analysis so that results can be shared with the patient during the same appointment. Towards the end of the project, CCP will be trialled in a community diagnostic centre to gather feedback from patients and healthcare professionals.
The long-term goal is to support earlier diagnosis and treatment, helping reduce hospital visits and tackle health inequalities. By enabling earlier intervention and delivering care closer to home, CCP has the potential to improve outcomes for millions of people living with lung disease.
For those looking to reduce their chances of developing lung disease, say experts at UC San Francisco, then it may be smart to avoid inhaling cannabis.
A new study in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that inhaling marijuana every day is associated with a 44% increased chance of developing asthma. It also increases the odds of developing a common set of lung diseases known as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by 27%.
The risk of COPD, which includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis, may be understated. The disease takes decades to develop, and the researchers did not have detailed information on how long people in the study had been using cannabis.
Researchers defined “inhaling” as smoking, vaping, and so-called “dabbing,” which involves breathing in the vapors of concentrated marijuana. The study found an association between elevated risks to a person’s lungs and doing any of those things with cannabis even for those who had never smoked cigarettes.
For those who never smoked cigarettes, inhaling marijuana every day was linked to a 51% increased likelihood of developing asthma. The association with COPD was also elevated, but it was not statistically significant.
The study is the largest yet to examine the association between inhaling cannabis and risks to respiratory health among people who have not smoked cigarettes. Of the 380 000 adult participants, nearly 222 000 had never smoked tobacco. The data comes from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a national survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Experts say the broad legalization of marijuana across much of the country and the perception that it is healthier than tobacco has led people to minimize the risks.
“The message about smoking tobacco being bad for you has gotten out there, but for cannabis, it’s much less clear,” said Alison Rustagi, MD, PhD, assistant professor at UCSF and first author of the paper.
“If people are looking to reduce their likelihood of developing a chronic lung disease, they should not start using cannabis,” she said. “And if they already smoke cannabis, they should do it less often.”
It is not only premature babies and children with underlying diseases who suffer from serious respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections. Even healthy, full-term babies are at significant risk of intensive care or prolonged hospitalisation – especially during the first three months of life. This is according to a comprehensive registry study from Karolinska Institutet published in The Lancet Regional Health – Europe.
RSV is a common cause of respiratory infections in young children and accounts for around 245,000 hospital admissions annually in Europe. Researchers have now analysed data from over 2.3 million children born in Sweden between 2001 and 2022 to find out who is at greatest risk of suffering serious complications or dying from an RSV infection.
Preventive treatment available
It is well-known that premature babies and children with chronic diseases are at increased risk of developing severe illness when infected with RSV. It is also known that children under three months of age are particularly vulnerable, but it has not been entirely clear how common severe disease is among previously healthy children. The study shows that the largest group among the children who needed intensive care or were hospitalised for a long period of time were under three months of age, previously healthy and born at full term.
“When shaping treatment strategies, it is important to take into account that even healthy infants can be severely affected by RSV,” says the study’s first author, Giulia Dallagiacoma, a physician and doctoral student at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet. “The good news is that there is now preventive treatment that can be given to newborns, and a vaccine that can be given to pregnant women.”
Starting September 10, 2025, all newborns in Sweden are being offered preventive treatment with antibodies during the RSV season. The drug works much like a vaccine and protects against severe RSV infection for about six months.
Several risk factors identified
A total of 1.7 per cent of the children in the study were diagnosed with RSV infection. Among those, just under 12 per cent (4,621 children) had a severe course of illness. The median age of children who needed intensive care was just under two months, and the majority of them had no underlying disease.
The researchers identified several factors that were linked to an increased risk of needing intensive care or dying. Children who were born in the winter, or had siblings aged 0–3 years or a twin, had approximately a threefold increased risk, while children who were small at birth had an almost fourfold increased risk. Children with underlying medical conditions had more than a fourfold increased risk of severe illness or death.
“We know that several underlying diseases increase the risk of severe RSV infection, and it is these children who have so far been targeted for protection with the preventive treatment that has been available,” says the study’s last author, Samuel Rhedin, resident physician at Sachs’ Children and Youth Hospital and associate professor at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet. “However, the study highlights that a large proportion of children who require intensive care due to their RSV infection were previously healthy. Now that better preventive medicines are available, it is therefore positive that the definition of risk groups is being broadened to offer protection during the RSV season to previously healthy infants as well.”
As part of the ongoing fight against tuberculosis, scientists within Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Calibr-Skaggs have developed a promising new compound targeting a key bacterial enzyme on M. tuberculosis. The compound, using a novel mechanism, proved effective against even drug-resistant strains of tuberculosis in early studies. (Inna Krieger/Texas A&M AgriLife)
Scientists have developed a new compound that could offer a breakthrough in the global fight against tuberculosis, history’s deadliest infectious disease.
A study recently published in Nature describes the treatment potential of the novel compound known as CMX410. The drug uniquely targets a crucial enzyme in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium responsible for tuberculosis. Importantly, this compound even proved effective against drug-resistant infections, which are common globally and pose a significant challenge for controlling the disease’s spread and progression.
The discovery was made possible through collaborations formed by the TB Drug Accelerator program, an initiative funded by The Gates Foundation to support research focused on developing the most promising tuberculosis treatments.
“A lot of people think of tuberculosis as a disease of the past,” Sacchettini said. “But in reality, it remains a major public health issue requiring significant attention, collaboration and innovation to overcome.”
A smarter way to fight back
The new compound identified by AgriLife Research and Calibr-Skaggs works by blocking a crucial enzyme, polyketide synthase 13 or Pks13, that M. tuberculosis needs to build its protective cell wall. Without the functionality of this protein, the bacteria can’t survive to cause infection.
For over a decade, scientists have recognised this protein as a high-value target in the fight against tuberculosis. Yet, despite its potential, drug development efforts have repeatedly fallen short – largely because compounds must clear a high bar for both safety and therapeutic performance.
The unique mechanism of CMX410 makes it highly specific for its target, which translates to a favourable safety profile. By incorporating a reactive chemical group that forms an irreversible bond with a critical site on Pks13, the researchers enhanced the compound’s selectivity, minimising potentially negative off-target effects. This modification also reduces the likelihood of resistance emerging.
The addition of this key chemical group was accomplished with click chemistry, a method that snaps molecules together like puzzle pieces. Click chemistry was developed by co-author Barry Sharpless, Ph.D., W.M. Keck Professor of Chemistry at Scripps Research and two-time Nobel Laureate, and it has led to the development of extensive libraries of chemical compounds.
“This technique represents a new tool for drug design,” said McNamara. “We expect to see its uses expand in the coming years to help address public health concerns with a critical need, including tuberculosis.”
Early results prove safe and effective
The team began by investigating a library of compounds shared by the Sharpless lab to identify molecules that could inhibit bacterial growth of M. tuberculosis.
After intensive optimization to improve compound potency and other pharmacological properties led by Calibr-Skaggs tuberculosis team members and co-first authors Baiyuan Yang, Ph.D., associate director of medicinal chemistry, and Paridhi Sukheja, Ph.D., investigator of infectious diseases, CMX410 was identified as a strong contender.
Yang, who led the chemistry optimisation, said the team explored more than 300 analogues to identify a compound with the right balance of potency, selectivity and safety. The team ultimately tested CMX410 against 66 strains of M. tuberculosis and found that it worked on both laboratory and multidrug-resistant strains collected from real patients.
“Identifying this novel target was an exciting moment,” said Sukheja, who led many early studies showing CMX410 could target a previously unexplored gene. “It opened up a completely new path forward, especially against strains that have learned to evade existing treatments.”
In other early experiments, the researchers determined that CMX410 could be safely combined with other tuberculosis antibiotics. This was an especially important factor for this disease, as treatment regimens require multiple drugs to be taken together for months at a time.
Researchers found no adverse effects in their initial tests in animal models even at the maximum dose level. And because CMX410 is highly specific to its target protein, they see it as unlikely to disrupt other beneficial bacteria or cause broader microbiome imbalances, a common side effect of conventional antibiotics.
Progress toward better treatments
The addition of a specialised chemical group that allows CMX410 to irreversibly bind to its target makes the compound extremely selective. These types of inhibitors remain an exciting and underexplored class of drugs, and further research will be needed to confirm their safety for humans.
Nonetheless, the precision, unique mechanism, good safety profile and other key features all make CMX410 a promising candidate for treating tuberculosis.
“These early results are very encouraging,” said Inna Krieger, Ph.D., senior research scientist in Sacchettini’s lab and co-first author of the study. “Cell wall-targeting antibiotics have long been a cornerstone of tuberculosis treatment. However, after decades of widespread use, their effectiveness is waning due to the rise of drug-resistant strains.
“We are working to discover new drugs that disrupt essential biological processes and identify optimal combinations with existing drugs to enable shorter, safer and more effective treatment regimens. Through these efforts, we hope to help move the world closer to a future free from tuberculosis.”
People who have had COVID are at increased risk of developing certain inflammatory diseases of the airways, such as asthma, hay fever and chronic sinusitis. However, vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus appears to reduce the risk, according to a comprehensive epidemiological study led by researchers at Karolinska Institutet.
The international research team used an electronic health database in the United States, TriNetX, to investigate the link between COVID and so-called type-2 inflammatory diseases, a group of chronic conditions in which the immune system overreacts to allergens or infections.
The researchers compared 973 794 people who had had COVID with 691 270 people who had been vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus and 4 388 409 healthy controls with no documented infection or vaccination.
Inflammation in the airways
The results are presented in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. People who had had COVID had a 66% higher risk of developing asthma, a 74% higher risk of chronic sinusitis and a 27% higher risk of hay fever compared with healthy controls. However, no increased risk was seen for the skin disease atopic eczema or for eosinophilic oesophagitis, an inflammation of the oesophagus.
“Our results suggest that COVID-19 can trigger type-2 inflammation in the airways, but not in other organs,” says Philip Curman, a physician and researcher at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Karolinska Institutet, Sweden, who led the research.
Vaccination against the virus had the opposite effect. The risk of asthma was 32% lower among vaccinated individuals compared with healthy unvaccinated individuals. The risk of sinusitis and hay fever was also slightly lower.
More than twice the risk
When people who had had COVID were compared with vaccinated individuals, an even clearer effect was seen. Infected individuals had more than twice the risk of developing asthma or chronic sinusitis and a 40% higher risk of developing hay fever compared with those who had been vaccinated.
“It is interesting to see that vaccination not only protects against the infection itself, but also appears to provide good protection against certain respiratory complications,” says Philip Curman.
The study is retrospective, i.e. based on data that has already been collected. This means that the researchers cannot draw any firm conclusions about causal links. Another limitation is that some infections may have gone undiagnosed, especially if they were detected through self-testing.
The research was conducted in close collaboration with the University of Lübeck and the Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology in Germany, the Technical University of Madrid in Spain and Bar-Ilan University in Israel. It was mainly funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft), Region Stockholm and Karolinska Institutet. Two researchers received travel grants from TriNetX, which provides the database used in the study, and one of the authors is employed by the company.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a well-known cause of infections in children, but it’s understudied in older individuals. In a retrospective study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, adults aged 65 and older hospitalised for RSV in Ontario, Canada experienced significantly higher rates of adverse outcomes such as longer length of hospital stay, transfer to intensive care, and 30-day mortality, compared with patients hospitalised with influenza, urinary tract infection, or fracture.
Interestingly, RSV hospitalisation was also associated with higher rates of heart failure and atrial fibrillation up to 1-year post-discharge, regardless of prior cardiovascular conditions.
“Unlike other respiratory viruses, immunity against RSV tends to decline relatively quickly. This means that a previous infection will not afford the same long-term protection as it might for influenza or COVID-19,” said corresponding author Chris Verschoor, PhD, HSN, Foundation Research Chair in Healthy Aging at Health Sciences North Research Institute. “Our findings reinforce the importance of RSV vaccination in older adults and suggest that monitoring for signs of heart disease following an RSV illness may be pragmatic.”
This illustration depicts a 3D computer-generated image of a group of Gram-positive, Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. The artistic recreation was based upon scanning electron microscopic (SEM) imagery. Credit: CDC on Unsplash
In a recent multicentre prospective study conducted at three hospitals in Tennessee and Georgia, including Vanderbilt University Medical Center, researchers at VUMC found a substantial burden of hospitalisations for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) among adults.
Community-acquired pneumonia refers to a case of the disease contracted without prior exposure to a health care setting, otherwise known as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP).
The study, published in JAMA Network Open, included data from 2018 to 2022 and used a novel serotype-specific urinary test that can identify infections caused by 30 different Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes. A serotype refers to a distinct strain of microorganism, such as bacteria.
An important aspect of the study was the identification of noninvasive pneumococcal infections, said Carlos Grijalva, MD, MPH, professor of Health Policy and Biomedical Informatics and the study’s lead author.
“Standard clinical diagnostic methods such as bacterial cultures of blood are helpful for identifying invasive cases of pneumococcal disease, but the majority of pneumococcal pneumonias are thought to be noninvasive,” Grijalva added. “Using a novel and more sensitive urinary antigen detection method allowed us to identify a number of pneumococcal infections that may have otherwise passed unrecognised.”
Based on current population estimates, some 114 800 U.S. adults may be hospitalised for pneumococcal pneumonia each year, a figure made up in large part by older adults. And according to the study’s findings, each year sees approximately 340 hospitalisations for community-acquired pneumonia per 100 000 adults, approximately 14% of which had evidence of Streptococcus pneumoniae infection.
“Our study results show that Streptococcus pneumoniae remains an important cause of severe community-acquired pneumonia,” said Wesley Self, MD, MPH, professor of Emergency Medicine, Senior Vice President for Clinical Research and the paper’s senior author.
Many of the serotypes identified by pneumococcal detections corresponded with those covered by a recently licensed adult-specific pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, V116, which includes 21 serotypes but was not commercially available during the study period.
“Vaccines with coverage of additional pneumococcal serotypes could be quite beneficial in lessening the burden of severe pneumonia on the U.S. population, especially among older adults,” added Self, who holds the Directorship in Emergency Care Research.
For decades, medical professionals debated whether a common antiviral medication used to treat flu in children caused neuropsychiatric events or if the infection itself was the culprit.
Now researchers at Monroe Carell Jr. Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt have debunked a long-standing theory about oseltamivir, known as Tamiflu.
According to the study, published in JAMA Neurology, oseltamivir treatment during flu episodes was associated with a reduced risk of serious neuropsychiatric events, such as seizures, altered mental status and hallucination.
“Our findings demonstrated what many pediatricians have long suspected, that the flu, not the flu treatment, is associated with neuropsychiatric events,” said principal investigator James Antoon, MD, PhD, MPH, assistant professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine at Monroe Carell. “In fact, oseltamivir treatment seems to prevent neuropsychiatric events rather than cause them.”
Key points:
Influenza itself was associated with an increase in neuropsychiatric events compared to children with no influenza, regardless of oseltamivir use.
Among children with influenza, those treated with oseltamivir had about 50% reduction in neuropsychiatric events.
Among children without influenza, those who were treated with oseltamivir prophylactically had the same rate of events as the baseline group with no influenza.
“Taken together, these three findings do not support the theory that oseltamivir increases the risk of neuropsychiatric events,” said Antoon. “It’s the influenza.”
The team reviewed the de-identified data from a cohort of children and adolescents ages 5-17 who were enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020.
During the four-year period, 692 295 children, with a median age of 11 years, were included in the study cohort. During follow-up, study children experienced 1230 serious neuropsychiatric events (898 neurologic and 332 psychiatric).
The clinical outcomes definition included both neurologic (seizures, encephalitis, altered mental status, ataxia/movement disorders, vision changes, dizziness, headache, sleeping disorders) and psychiatric (suicidal or self-harm behaviours, mood disorders, psychosis/hallucination) events.
“The 2024-2025 influenza season highlighted the severity of influenza-associated neurologic complications, with many centres reporting increased frequency and severity of neurologic events during the most recent season,” said Antoon. “It is important for patients and families to know the true risk-benefit profile of flu treatments, such as oseltamivir, that are recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.”
“These flu treatments are safe and effective, especially when used early in the course of clinical disease,” added senior author Carlos Grijalva, MD, MPH, professor of Health Policy and Biomedical Informatics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Investigators hope the findings will provide reassurance to both caregivers and medical professionals about the safety of oseltamivir and its role in preventing flu-associated complications.
