Category: Diet and Nutrition

Many not Getting Enough Nutrients in Their Pregnancy, Study Finds

Source: Pixabay CC0

It’s generally estimated that around 10% of pregnant people struggle to meet their nutritional needs – but the real number could be far higher, according to new research in The Journal of Nutrition.

Over 90% of pregnant individuals are potentially failing to get enough iron, vitamin D, or vitamin E from the food they eat, while over one-third could be short of calcium, vitamin C, and vitamin A. Troublingly, almost two-thirds of pregnant people were also found to be getting insufficient dietary folate – a critical nutrient that helps prevent birth defects in the baby’s brain and spine.

“It’s important to remember that many pregnant people take prenatal vitamin supplements, which might help prevent nutritional deficiencies,” says lead author Dr Samantha Kleinberg, professor at Stevens Institute of Technology. “Nonetheless, this is a startling finding that suggests we need to be looking much more closely at whether pregnant individuals are getting the nutrients they need.”

Where most previous studies of nutrition during pregnancy relied on a few days of food diaries, or on simply asking people what they remembered eating, the Stevens team asked pregnant people to take before-and-after photos of everything they ate over two 14-day periods. Experts then reviewed the photos to assess the amount of food actually eaten and determine the nutrients consumed during each meal.

That’s a far more accurate approach, because people are notoriously bad at estimating portion size or accurately reporting what they’ve eaten, Dr Kleinberg explains. A photo-based approach is also much less laborious for pregnant people, making it easy to collect data over a period of weeks instead of just a few days.

“Most surveys only track diet over a day or two – but if you feel off one day and don’t eat much, or have a big celebratory meal over the weekend, that can skew the data,” Dr Kleinberg says. “By looking at a longer time period, and using photos to track diet and nutrition, we’re able to get a much richer and more precise picture of what people actually ate.”

The study found significant dietary variations between individuals, but also among the same individuals from one day to the next, suggesting that shorter studies and population-based reports might be failing to spot important nutritional deficits. “Some people eat really well, and others don’t – so if you just take an average, it looks like everything’s fine,” Dr Kleinberg explains. “This study suggests that in reality, an alarming number of pregnant people may not be getting the nutrients they need from their food.”

Using food photos also recorded the exact timing of meals and snacks, and to explore the way that patterns of eating behaviour correlated with total energy and nutrient intake. When pregnant people ate later in the day, the data shows, they were likely to consume significantly more total calories – potentially an important finding as researchers explore connections between eating behaviours and health problems such as gestational diabetes.

The current research didn’t directly study health outcomes, so it’s too early to say whether insufficient nutrition or excessive energy consumption is adversely impacting pregnant individuals or their babies. “We’ll be digging into that in future studies, and looking at possible connections with eating patterns and changes in glucose tolerance,” Dr Kleinberg says.

Source: Stevens Institute of Technology

Genetically Tailored Diets for IBS may Soon be Possible

Irritable bowel syndrome. Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0

An international study has found that genetic variations in human carbohydrate-active enzymes may affect how people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) respond to a carbohydrate-reduced diet.

The research, which is published in Clinical Gastroenterology & Hepatologyshows that IBS patients with genetic defects in carbohydrate digestion had a better response to certain dietary interventions. This could lead to tailored treatments for IBS, using genetic markers to predict which patients benefit from specific diets.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a digestive disorder affecting up to 10% of the global population. It is characterised by abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhoea, or constipation. Despite its prevalence, treating IBS remains a challenge as symptoms and responses to dietary or pharmacological interventions vary significantly.

Patients often connect their symptoms to eating certain foods, especially carbohydrates, and dietary elimination or reduction has emerged as an effective treatment option, though not all patients experience the same benefits.

Nutrigenetics (the science investigating the combined action of our genes and nutrition on human health) has highlighted how changes in the DNA can affect the way we process food. A well-known example is lactose intolerance, where the loss of function in the lactase enzyme hinders the digestion of dairy products.

Now, this pioneering new study suggests that genetic variations in human carbohydrate-active enzymes (hCAZymes) may similarly affect how IBS patients respond to a carbohydrate-reduced (low-FODMAP) diet.

The team have now revealed that individuals with hypomorphic (defective) variants in hCAZyme genes are more likely to benefit from a carbohydrate-reduced diet.

The study, involving 250 IBS patients, compared two treatments: a diet low in fermentable carbohydrates (FODMAPs) and the antispasmodic medication otilonium bromide. Strikingly, of the 196 patients on the diet, those carrying defective hCAZyme genes showed marked improvement compared to non-carriers, and the effect was particularly pronounced in patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS (IBS-D), who were six times more likely to respond to the diet. In contrast, this difference was not observed in patients receiving medication, underscoring the specificity of genetic predisposition in dietary treatment efficacy.

These findings suggest that genetic variations in hCAZyme enzymes, which play a key role in digesting carbohydrates, could become critical markers for designing personalised dietary treatments for IBS. The ability to predict which patients respond best to a carbohydrate-reduced diet has the potential to strongly impact IBS management, leading to better adherence and improved outcomes.

Study leader Dr D’Amato, Gastrointestinal Genetics Research group at CIC bioGUNE and the Department of Medicine and Surgery at LUM University in in Italy.

In the future, incorporating knowledge of hCAZyme genotype into clinical practice could enable clinicians to identify in advance which patients are most likely to benefit from specific dietary interventions. This would not only avoid unnecessary restrictive diets for those unlikely to benefit but also open the door to personalised medicine in IBS.

Source: University of Nottingham

Raising Happy Eaters: Unlocking the Secrets of Childhood Appetite

Photo by Vanessa Loring on Pexels

The foundation for healthy eating behaviour starts in infancy. Young children learn to regulate their appetite through a combination of biological, psychological, and sociological factors. In a new paper published in Social Science & Medicine, researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign propose a model that explores these factors and their interactions, providing guidelines for better understanding childhood appetite self-regulation.

“When we talk about obesity, the common advice is often to just eat less and exercise more. That’s a simplistic recommendation, which almost makes it seem like an individual’s willpower solely determines their approach to food,” said lead author Sehyun Ju, a doctoral student in the Department of Human Development and Family Studies, part of the College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences at Illinois. 

Appetite self-regulation is related to general self-regulation, but it specifically concerns an individual’s ability to regulate food intake, which affects healthy development and obesity risk. Children are born with a capacity to regulate appetite based on hunger and satiety signals, but with increased exposure to environmental factors, their eating is increasingly guided by psychological reasoning and motivations. Therefore, it is important to take a developmental perspective to trace changes in eating behaviours over time, Ju stated.

Ju and her colleagues provide a comprehensive framework based on the biopsychosocial pathways model, which outlines three interacting categories: Biological factors, including sensory experience, physiological hunger and satiety signals, brain-gut interaction, and the influence of the gut microbiome; psychological factors, including emotional self-regulation, cognitive control, stress regulation, and reward processing; and social factors, such as parental behaviour and feeding practices, culture, geographic location, and food insecurity.

The researchers combine this framework with temperamental theory to explore how the pathways are modified by individual temperament.

Children react differently to stimuli based on their psychological and emotional make up, Ju explained. For example, openness to novelty and positive anticipation can affect whether a child is willing to try new foods. If a parent pressures their child to eat, it could be counter-productive for a child with heightened sensitivity to negative affect, causing the child to consume less.

The model also takes children’s developmental stages into account. Infants have basic appetite regulation based on physiological cues. They gradually become more susceptible to external influences and by age 3-5, children begin to exhibit greater self-control and emotional regulation.

“By analysing the pathways outlined in our model, we can better understand the combined influences of multiple factors on children’s appetite self-regulation and their motivations to approach food,” Ju said. “For example, the presence of palatable food may not generate similar responses in everyone. Children could approach food as a reward, for pleasure-seeking, or to regulate emotions. The underlying motivations can be diverse, and they are influenced by external factors as well as temperamental characteristics.”

Socio-environmental influences include parent-child interactions around food, as well as non-food-related caregiver practices that can impact the child’s emotional regulation. The household food environment, cultural value of food intake, and food availability are also important factors, the researchers stated.

“If we understand the differential susceptibility to various factors, we can identify and modify the environmental influences that are particularly obesogenic based on children’s temperamental characteristics. Then we will be able to provide more refined approaches to support children’s healthy eating behaviour,” Ju explained.

Source: University of Illinois College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences

Avo at Breakfast for Women, Oats for Men, Study Suggests

Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash

New research from the University of Waterloo suggests that men and women should have different kinds of food for breakfast in order to help lose weight.

The study, which employed a mathematical model of men’s and women’s metabolisms, showed that men’s metabolisms respond better on average to a meal laden with high carbohydrates like oats and grains after fasting for several hours, while women are better served by a meal with a higher percentage of fat, such as omelettes and avocados. The findings are out now in Computers in Biology and Medicine.

“Lifestyle is a big factor in our overall health,” said Stéphanie Abo, an Applied Mathematics PhD candidate and the lead author of the study. “We live busy lives, so it’s important to understand how seemingly inconsequential decisions, such as what to have for breakfast, can affect our health and energy levels. Whether attempting to lose weight, maintain weight, or just keep up your energy, understanding your diet’s impact on your metabolism is important.”

The study builds on an existing gap in research on sex differences in how men and women process fat. “We often have less research data on women’s bodies than on men’s bodies,” said Anita Layton, a professor of Applied Mathematics and Canada 150 Research Chair in Mathematical Biology and Medicine.

“By building mathematical models based on the data we do have, we can test lots of hypotheses quickly and tweak experiments in ways that would be impractical with human subjects.”

“Since women have more body fat on average than men, you would think that they would burn less fat for energy, but they don’t,” said Layton. “The results of the model suggest that women store more fat immediately after a meal but also burn more fat during a fast.”

Going forward, the researchers hope to build more complex versions of their metabolism models and extend beyond the consideration of biological sex by incorporating an individual’s weight, age, or stage in the menstrual cycle.

Source: University of Waterloo

More Protein and Fibre While Dropping Calories is Key for Weight Loss

Photo by Andres Ayrton on Pexels

Participants on a self-directed dietary education program who had the greatest success at losing weight across a 25-month period consumed greater amounts of protein and fibre, found a study published in Obesity Science and Practice. Personalisation and flexibility also were key in creating plans that dieters could adhere to over time. 

At the one-year mark, successful dieters (41% of participants) had lost 12.9% of their body weight, compared with the remainder of the study sample, who lost slightly more than 2% of their starting weight. 

The dieters were participants in the Individualised Diet Improvement Program, which uses data visualisation tools and intensive dietary education sessions to increase dieters’ knowledge of key nutrients, enabling them to create a personalised, safe and effective weight-loss plan, said Manabu T. Nakamura, a professor of nutrition at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the leader of the research.

“Flexibility and personalisation are key in creating programs that optimise dieters’ success at losing weight and keeping it off,” Nakamura said. “Sustainable dietary change, which varies from person to person, must be achieved to maintain a healthy weight. The iDip approach allows participants to experiment with various dietary iterations, and the knowledge and skills they develop while losing weight serve as the foundation for sustainable maintenance.”

The pillars of iDip are increasing protein and fibre consumption along with consuming 1500 calories or less daily. 

Based on the dietary guidelines issued by the Institutes of Medicine, the iDip team created a one-of-a-kind, two-dimensional quantitative data visualisation tool that plots foods’ protein and fibre densities per calorie and provides a target range for each meal. Starting with foods they habitually ate, the dieters created an individualised plan, increasing their protein intake to about 80g and their fibre intake to about 20g daily.

In tracking the participants’ eating habits and their weights with Wi-Fi enabled scales, the team found strong inverse correlations between the percentages of fibre and protein eaten and dieters’ weight loss.    

“The research strongly suggests that increasing protein and fibre intake while simultaneously reducing calories is required to optimise the safety and efficacy of weight loss diets,” said first author and U. of I. alumna Mindy H. Lee, a then-graduate student and registered dietitian-nutritionist for the iDip program. 

Nakamura said the preservation of lean mass is very important while losing weight, especially when using weight-loss drugs.

 “Recently, the popularity of injectable weight loss medications has been increasing,” Nakamura said. “However, using these medications when food intake is strongly limited will cause serious side effects of muscle and bone loss unless protein intake is increased during weight loss.”

A total of 22 people who enrolled in the program completed it, including nine men and 13 women. Most of the dieters were between the ages of 30–64. Participants reported they had made two or more prior attempts to lose weight. They also had a variety of comorbidities – 54% had high cholesterol, 50% had skeletal problems and 36% had hypertension and/or sleep apnoea. Additionally, the dieters reported diagnoses of diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cancer and depression, according to the study.

The seven dieters who reported they had been diagnosed with depression lost significantly less weight: about 2.4% of their starting weight compared with those without depression, who lost 8.39% of their initial weight. The team found that weight loss did not differ significantly among participants with other comorbidities, or between younger and older participants or between men and women.

Body composition analysis indicated that dieters maintained their lean body mass, losing an average of 7.1kg of fat mass and minimal muscle mass at the six-month interval. Among those who lost greater than 5% of their starting weight, 78% of the weight they lost was fat, according to the study.

Overall, the participants reduced their fat mass from an average of 42.6kg at the beginning of the program to 35.7kg at the 15-month mark. Likewise, the dieters reduced their waists by about 7cm at six months and by a total of 9cm at 15 months, the team found. 

In tracking dieters’ protein and fibre intake, the team found a strong correlation between protein and fibre consumption and weight loss at three months and 12 months.

“The strong correlation suggests that participants who were able to develop sustainable dietary changes within the first three months kept losing weight in the subsequent months, whereas those who had difficulty implementing sustainable dietary patterns early on rarely succeeded in changing their diet in the later months,” Nakamura said.

The team hypothesised that this correlation could also have been associated with some dieters’ early weight loss success, which may have bolstered their motivation and adherence to their program.

Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Study Reveals Diet is the Main Risk Factor for Colon Cancer in Younger Adults

Photo by Alex Haney

A new Cleveland Clinic study has identified diet-derived molecules called metabolites as main drivers of young-onset colorectal cancer risk, especially those associated with red and processed meat. The NPJ Precision Oncology report, which analysed metabolite and microbiome datasets, highlighted that one of the best ways a younger ( < 60 years) adult can prevent colorectal cancer is to discuss their diet with their doctor.

Increased monitoring and screening for colorectal cancer is an extremely helpful tool. Despite the success of these methods, these data indicate physicians can take a different approach with their younger patients, says senior author and gastrointestinal oncologist Suneel Kamath,MD.

“At the end of the day, it’s impractical to apply our care models for those over 60 to younger adults simply because we cannot give everyone in the system yearly colonoscopies,” he explains. “What is much more feasible is to give everyone in the system a simple test to measure a biomarker that determines their colorectal cancer risk. Then we can give the most at-risk individuals appropriate screening.”

Former clinical fellow Thejus Jayakrishnan, MD, and Naseer Sangwan, PhD, director of the Microbial Sequencing & Analytics Resource Core co-led the work. Researchers in Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer provided large-scale analyses of patient data from individuals who received care for either young- or average-onset colorectal cancer at Cleveland Clinic.

One previous study from this team identified differences in the metabolites (diet-derived molecules) of young – versus average-onset colorectal cancer, while another identified differences in gut microbiome between younger and older adults with colorectal cancer. These studies provided many potential directions for studying young-onset CRC. However, when more factors are involved in cancer risk, it becomes more complicated to understand what’s going on and plan future research, Dr Sangwan says. Interactions between these factors, like when our gut bacteria consume our metabolites and produce their own, make it even more complex.

Dr Sangwan and his team then developed an AI algorithm to combine and analyse the existing studies’ datasets and clarify what factors are most relevant for future study. Surprisingly, Dr Sangwan’s analysis revealed that differences in diet (identified through analysing metabolites) accounted for a significant proportion of the differences observed between the young-onset and older-onset patients.

“Researchers – ourselves included – have begun to focus on the gut microbiome as a primary contributor to colon cancer risk. But our data clearly shows that the main driver is diet,” Dr Sangwan says. “We already know the main metabolites associated with young-onset risk, so we can now move our research forward in the correct direction.”

The team was excited to see diet play such a large role in cancer risk, because it is much easier to identify at-risk patients by counting the metabolites in their blood than it is to sequence the bacterial DNA in their stool for different microbes.

“It can actually be very complicated and difficult to change your microbiome,” explains Dr Kamath. “While it’s not always easy, it is much simpler to change your diet to prevent colon cancer.”

Addressing factors in our diet to prevent colon cancer

Younger colon cancer patients had higher levels of metabolites associated with the production and metabolism of an amino acid called arginine, and with the urea cycle compared to their older peers. These differences may be tied to long-term consumption of red meat and processed meat. The team is now analyzing national datasets to validate their Cleveland Clinic-specific findings in patients across the country.

After they show that arginine and urea cycle metabolites (and, by proxy, red and processed meat overconsumption) are elevated across younger adults with colon cancer nationwide, they plan to test whether certain diets or commercially available drugs that regulate arginine production and the urea cycle can help prevent or even treat young-onset colorectal cancer.

Dr Kamath says that even though more research is needed to understand exactly how dietary factors cause colon cancer, his current findings have already changed the way he delivers patient care.

“Even though I knew before this study that diet is an important factor in colon cancer risk, I didn’t always discuss it with my patients during their first visit. There is so much going on, it can already be so overwhelming,” says Dr Kamath. “Now, I always make sure to bring it up to my patients, and to any healthy friends or family members they may come in with, to try and equip them with the tools they need to make informed choices about their lifestyle.”

Source: Cleveland Clinic

Sugar Intake Decreasing but Still Too High

Further action needed, according to a University of Bonn study on child and adolescent nutrition

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

University of Bonn researchers have analysed data on sugar intake among children and adolescents in a long-term study, finding that intake has been declining steadily since 2010 – but is still above the level recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The results, to be published in the European Journal of Nutrition, are already available online.

“Our study concerns the intake of free sugars,” explains Dr Ines Perrar, who is a research associate at the University of Bonn Institute of Nutritional and Food Science (IEL) and lead author of the study. “There is debate on whether sugar, like salt and fats, is linked to the development of chronic diseases.” The WHO defines “free” sugar as any form of sugar, including honey, syrup and fruit juice concentrates, added by a manufacturer or when preparing food and beverages at home. Free sugar also includes sugar naturally occurring in juices.

For their project, IEL researchers analysed data from the “Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed” cohort study (DONALD). The DONALD study has been ongoing since 1985, gathering detailed data on nutrition, metabolism, growth and health of children and adolescents. “Study participants weigh and document everything they eat and drink on three consecutive days every year,” relates Dr Ute Nöthlings, Professor of Nutritional Epidemiology at the IEL. “Referring to our Institute’s in-house nutrient database, we are able to estimate intake of certain nutrients, including free sugars.”

Sugar intake too high among adolescents in particular

The authors evaluated 4218 sets of three-day weighing dietary records by 751 children and adolescents between ages three and 18 in the years 2010–2023. “Our finding is that free sugar intake continues to decline,” Dr Perrar notes, “but average daily intake still exceeds the level recommended by the WHO and the German Nutrition Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung, DGE) of a maximum 10% of total daily energy intake.”

An analysis of DONALD back in 2019 already indicated that free sugar intake has been declining since 2005, then in 2016 a median value of approximately 16% of daily energy intake was determined. That value has subsequently declined further to 11.7%. The researchers surmise this trend may be explained by increased awareness of the health consequences of excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and certain other sugary foods.

While the decline definitely represents good progress, there are noteworthy age group differences, as Professor Nöthlings points out, who is director of the DONALD study, spokesperson for the Transdisciplinary Research Area (TRA) Sustainable Futures and a member of the Life and Health TRA at the University of Bonn: “During the observation period, we saw a relatively high intake of free sugars around 15 percent of the daily energy intake in some cases, particularly among adolescents aged six to 14. The intake then declines significantly with increasing age.”

Actual sugar intake likely higher

The researchers point out that the actual sugar intake is likely higher than the study data suggests, due in part to potential under-reporting by the study participants self-reporting on what they eat. In addition, the study is not broadly representative of society, as the design of this large study favours participation by families of a rather higher socioeconomic status who are generally more aware regarding nutrition and health issues.

Source: University of Bonn

Parents’ Eating Behaviour Influences how Their Children Respond to Food

Photo by Vanessa Loring on Pexels

Young children often display similar eating behaviour as their parents, with a parent’s own eating style influencing how they feed their children, research at Aston University has shown.

The work, published in the journal Appetite, suggests that parents can help to shape healthy eating behaviour in their children both by how they themselves eat, as well as how they feed their children.

A team led by Professor Jacqueline Blissett at Aston University, asked parents to assess their own eating behaviour and looked for associations between those behaviours and those of their children.

The team grouped parents into four eating styles – ‘typical eating’, ‘avid eating’, ‘emotional eating’ and ‘avoidant eating’. Typical eaters, who made up 41.4% of the sample, have no extreme behaviours. Avid eaters (37.3%) have high food approach traits such as eating in response to food cues in the environment and their emotions, rather than hunger signals. Emotional eaters (15.7%) also eat in response to emotion but do not enjoy food as much as avid eaters. Avoidant eaters (5.6%) are extremely selective about food and have a low enjoyment of eating.

The direct links between child and parent behaviour were particularly clear in parents with avid or avoidant eating behaviours, whose children tended to have similar eating behaviour. Parents who had avid or emotional eating styles were more likely to use food to soothe or comfort a child, who then in turn displayed avid or emotional eating traits. Where parents with avid or emotional eating traits provided a balanced and varied range of foods, the child was less likely to display the same behaviour.

The research follows on from previous work by the team, which identified the four main types of eating behaviour in children and linked parental feeding practices to those traits.

Dr Abigail Pickard, the lead researcher on the project, said:

“Parents are a key influence in children’s eating behaviour but equally, parents have the perfect opportunity to encourage a balanced diet and healthy eating from a young age in their children. Therefore, it is important to establish how a parent’s eating style is associated with their children’s eating style and what factors could be modified to encourage healthy relationships with food.”

She and the team will now look at developing an intervention to support parents to use other ways to regulate emotions, model healthy eating, and create a healthy home food environment. This could help to prevent less favourable eating behaviours being passed down the generations from parent to child.

Source: Aston University

Potentially Hepatotoxic Supplements are Widespread

Photo by TUMERI on Unsplash

Products containing potentially hepatotoxic botanical ingredients are being widely consumed in the US, according to a study from University of Michigan researchers. The study, which was published in JAMA, examined national survey data from 2017–2020 and found that over a 30-day period, 4.7% of the adults surveyed 2020 took herbal and dietary supplements containing at least one of the hepatotoxic botanicals selected for the study.

Over 80 000 herbal and dietary supplement (HDS) products are available for purchase without a prescription for the purposes of promoting general health and treating minor ailments, and are largely unregulated. Most of these are products such as multivitamins, with well-defined ingredients on the label. But an estimated 5% to 12% of HDS products are plant-derived, complex multi-ingredient botanicals, some of which have been shown to have hepatotoxic properties. These included products containing turmeric, green tea, ashwagandha, black cohosh, garcinia cambogia, and red yeast rice.

Lead author Alisa Likhitsup, MD, MPH, clinical assistant professor of Medicine at U-M spoke about the motivation for the study. “Our interest started when we saw cases of liver toxicity from herbal and dietary supplement use in people enrolled into the ongoing NIH-funded DILIN study,” Likhitsup said.

“But it was difficult to say how many people were using these supplements and why. The major finding here is the large number of Americans taking these products with an estimated 15 million adult Americans taking them on a regular basis.”

Supplements are of particular concern for the researchers for several interrelated reasons: lack of government regulation, insufficient attention in medical screenings, and frequent mislabelling.

In a previous study, we found that there was a great deal of mislabelling of some of these products,” said senior author Robert Fontana MD, U-Me hepatologist, professor of medicine.

“We performed analytical chemistry and found about a 50% mismatch between stated ingredients on the label and what they actually contained, which is quite alarming. If you buy a supplement and it says it has a certain ingredient, it’s basically a coin flip if that’s true or not.”

The mislabelling comes about from a lack of regulation, and since the effects are poorly understood, patients are not often asked what supplements they are taking.

Another study had found a 70% increase in liver transplants due to injury caused by supplements from 2010–2020, compared to 1994–2009.

“We weren’t aware that so many people were taking these supplements,” said Likhitsup, a transplant hepatologist.

“So, when doctors see patients in the office, they don’t necessarily ask about supplement use or take into consideration their effects.”

In the studied population, the highest proportion of people consumed turmeric (3.46%), followed by green tea (1.01%), ashwagandha and black cohosh (0.38%), garcinia cambogia (0.27%), and red yeast rice products (0.19%). Most of the users did not start consuming the botanicals on doctor’s advice, instead it was their own accord. They most commonly cited reason was the improvement or maintenance of health.

Of the turmeric users, 26.8% consumed the products specifically for supposed benefits for joint health or arthritis, while 27.2% of the green tea users were hoping to improve their energy levels.

The majority of the garcinia cambogia users hoped it would help them lose weight.

The JAMA study was not able to establish any kind of causal relationship between consumption of the six botanicals and liver injury since it was intended to assess supplement exposure in the general US population. Given the lack of regulation, however, the researchers still hope to make clinicians and patients aware of just how much is still unknown about these supplements.

“We’re not trying to create alarm,” Fontana said.

“We’re just trying to increase awareness that the over-the-counter supplements people are taking and buying have not been tested nor necessarily proven to be safe.”

Source: Michigan Medicine – University of Michigan

Ketogenic Diet Reduces Friendly Gut Bacteria and Raises Cholesterol Levels

Photo by Jose Ignacio Pompe on Unsplash

A study from the University of Bath reveals that ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets can increase cholesterol levels and reduce beneficial gut bacteria, specifically Bifidobacterium.

Published in Cell Reports Medicine, the research from the Centre for Nutrition, Exercise, and Metabolism involved 53 healthy adults for up to 12 weeks. Participants followed either a moderate sugar diet (control), a low-sugar diet (less than 5% of calories from sugar), or a ketogenic (keto) low-carbohydrate diet (less than 8% of calories from carbohydrates).

Key findings include:

•Increased Cholesterol: The keto diet raised cholesterol levels, particularly in small and medium sized LDL particles. The diet increased apolipoprotein B (apoB), which causes plaque buildup in arteries. In contrast, the low-sugar diet significantly reduced cholesterol in LDL particles.

•Reduced Favourable Gut Bacteria: The keto diet altered gut microbiome composition, notably decreasing Bifidobacteria, beneficial bacteria often found in probiotics. This bacteria has wide ranging benefits: producing b vitamins, inhibiting pathogens and harmful bacteria and lowering cholesterol. Sugar restriction did not significantly impact the gut microbiome composition.

•Glucose Tolerance: The keto diet reduced glucose tolerance, meaning the adults’ bodies became less efficient at handling carbohydrates.

•Both Diets Resulted In Fat Loss: Keto Diet resulted in an average of 2.9kg fat mass loss per person, whilst the sugar restricted diet followed with an average 2.1kg fat mass loss per person at 12 weeks.

•Metabolism: Researchers also noticed that the keto diet caused significant changes in lipid metabolism and muscle energy use, shifting the body’s fuel preference from glucose to fats.

•Physical Activity Levels: Both sugar restriction and keto diets achieved fat loss without changing physical activity levels. Previous studies from the Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism have shown that skipping breakfast or intermittent fasting cause reductions in physical activity.

Lead researcher Dr. Aaron Hengist highlighted the concerning cholesterol findings:

“Despite reducing fat mass, the ketogenic diet increased the levels of unfavourable fats in the blood of our participants, which, if sustained over years, could have long-term health implications such as increased risk of heart disease and stroke.”

Dr. Russell Davies, who led the microbiome research, explained the impact on gut health:

“Dietary fibre is essential for the survival of beneficial gut bacteria like Bifidobacteria. The ketogenic diet reduced fibre intake to around 15 grams per day, half the NHS recommended intake. This reduction in Bifidobacteria might contribute to significant long-term health consequences such as an increased risk of digestive disorders like irritable bowel disease, increased risk of intestinal infection and a weakened immune function.”

Professor Javier Gonzalez, who oversaw the research, commented on the glucose findings:

“The ketogenic diet reduced fasting glucose levels but also reduced the body’s ability to handle carbs from a meal. By measuring proteins in muscle samples taken from participants’ legs, we think this is probably an adaptive response to eating less carbohydrates day-to-day and reflects insulin resistance to storing carbs in muscle. This insulin resistance is not necessarily a bad thing if people are following a ketogenic diet, but if these changes persist when people switch back to a higher carbohydrate diet it could increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the long-term”

In light of this new research, the academics conclude that if you’re considering a diet, a low sugar one will be better for most people. More work is needed to understand how individuals may benefit from each type of diet. The government recommends that free sugars (those added to food or drink or found naturally in honey, syrups, fruit juices and smoothies) should be restricted to less than 5% of total energy intake. Professor Dylan Thompson, who also oversaw the work, said:

“The ketogenic diet is effective for fat loss, but it comes with varied metabolic and microbiome effects that may not suit everyone. In contrast, sugar restriction supports government guidelines for reducing free sugar intake, promoting fat loss without apparent negative health impacts.”

Source: University of Bath