Category: Gastrointestinal

Categories : Diet and Nutrition GastrointestinalTags :

Tryptophan-rich Foods might Ease Colitis… and Braai Smoke may Help too

On By ModernMedia

…although braai smoke still isn’t great for your lungs

Irritable bowel syndrome. Credit: Scientific Animations CC4.0

Ulcerative colitis is an inflammatory bowel disease that is prone to flareups, especially around feasts. New research in mice suggests that certain foods – especially those high in tryptophan, like turkey, pork, nuts and seeds – could reduce the risk of a colitis flare. It also helps explain why cigarette smokers are less likely to have colitis. The findings, published in Nature Communications, point to a noninvasive method of improving long-term colitis management, if the results are validated in people.

“Although there are some treatments for ulcerative colitis, not everyone responds to them,” says senior author Sangwon Kim, PhD, an assistant professor of immunology at Thomas Jefferson University.

“This disease has a huge impact on quality of life, and can lead to surgery to remove the colon or cancer.”

Since ulcerative colitis is caused by inflammation of the inner lining of the colon and rectum, Dr Kim and his colleagues looked for ways to calm the inflamed tissue.

They focused on a group of immune cells called T-regulatory (T-reg) cells, which can help break the cycle of inflammation. They reasoned that getting more T-reg cells to the colon might reduce the inflammation that causes colitis.

Dr Kim’s team thought about how to attract the T-reg cells, and found a specific receptor, CPR15, on the surface of T-reg cells that acts like a magnet for the colon. The more CPR15 the T-reg cells have, the more strongly they are attracted to the colon.

So they searched for molecules that could make T-reg cells produce more GPR15 to turn up the power of the magnet. They found tryptophan – specifically, one of the molecules that tryptophan breaks down into in the body – could increase these receptors called GPR15.

To test whether these molecules could control colitis, the researchers supplemented tryptophan in the diet of mice over a period of two weeks.

They saw a doubling in the amount of inflammation-suppressing T-reg cells in the colon tissue compared to mice that weren’t fed extra tryptophan.

Dr. Kim’s team also saw a reduction in colitis symptoms, which seemed to last for at least a week after tryptophan was removed from the diet.

“In human time that might translate to about a month of benefit,” explained Dr Kim.

However, when tryptophan was given to mice during a colitis flare, it provided little benefit, suggesting this dietary change might only be effective at preventing future flares rather than treating them.

In a chance finding, while looking for molecules that could increase GPR15, the researchers also stumbled across a molecule that helps explain why smoking seems to be protective against colitis. Researchers have long observed that people who smoke cigarettes have a lower incidence of ulcerative colitis than the general public.

Dr. Kim’s team found a molecule that is prevalent in smoke – from cigarettes and barbeque alike – that can also increase GPR15 levels on T-reg cells “Although both might help protect against colitis, tryptophan is obviously the much safer and healthier option,” says Dr Kim.

In the future, the researchers plan to test whether these results can be translated to people with colitis. Tryptophan supplement is considered safe, as long as the dose doesn’t exceed 100mg per day. Using the mouse data as a guide, Dr Kim expects that 100mg could be enough to see an effect in humans, and is planning further testing in clinical trials.

Source: Thomas Jefferson University

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and Conditions GastrointestinalTags :

Even Low-level IBD is a Risk Factor for Serious Infection

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels

A study using Swedish health registers had found that inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an independent risk factor for serious infection, even at very low levels of gastrointestinal inflammation.

IBD is an umbrella term for chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, with a population prevalence of around 0.5%. The main types of IBD are ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Unlike irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), IBD results in visible damage to the intestinal mucous membrane.

In IBD, periods of high disease activity are sometimes followed by longer periods of low or no activity. However, the extent to which IBD patients with low disease activity are also at increased risk of serious infections, including sepsis, has been unclear.

The current study, published in the journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, included data on more than 55 000 people diagnosed with IBD. ‘Serious infections’ was defined as infections requiring hospitalisation.

The difference between healed and unhealed

The results show that during periods of low disease activity but active gastrointestinal inflammation, known as microscopic inflammation, there was an increased risk of being affected by serious infections compared to periods of microscopically healed intestinal mucosa.

In the case of microscopic inflammation, the number of serious infections was 4.62 per 100 people per year. The corresponding figure for microscopically healed mucosa was 2.53. This corresponded to a 59% relative risk increase for residual microscopic gastrointestinal inflammation, on adjusting the results for various confounders.

Interestingly, the results held true even after adjusting for the prescribed IBD medications, and were otherwise similar regardless of age group, sex, and level of education.

Healing provides important protection

First and corresponding author Karl Mårild, an associate professor in paediatrics at the University of Gothenburg’s Sahlgrenska Academy, explained: “We have shown that even during periods of microscopic intestinal inflammation, IBD patients have an increased risk of serious infections, including sepsis, compared to periods when they have a microscopically healed mucosa. This is also true for patients who appear to have low-active disease in clinical terms, but who have microscopic intestinal inflammation beneath the surface.

“The results indicate that achieving a fully healed intestinal mucosa in IBD may reduce the risk of serious infections. This is important, as serious infections currently contribute toward increased morbidity and mortality in both children and adults with IBD.”

The results from the study are based on data from a national cohort (ESPRESSO) with information from Swedish health registers, and from the quality register for IBD (SWIBREG) on people in Sweden diagnosed with IBD between 1990 and 2016. This information was linked to data from microscopic intestinal examinations of patients with IBD.

Source: University of Gothenburg

Categories : Gastrointestinal Surgeries & ProceduresTags :

Hold the GLP-1 Agonists Before Surgery, New Advice Says

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Natanael Melchor on Unsplash

Patients taking Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists should stop taking them before they have surgery, due to the risk of aspirating while under general anaesthesia. This is the latest advice from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA).

Initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk reduction, GLP-1 agonists have shot up in popularity due to their effectiveness in weight loss. Despite having recent FDA approval, they have been used off-label for this purpose for quite some time.

When it comes to surgery, a number of organisations have recommended to hold these drugs either the day before or day of the procedure. For patients on weekly dosing, it is recommended to hold the dose for a week, the ASA notes.

GLP-1 agonists are associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects such as nausea, vomiting and delayed gastric emptying. The effects on gastric emptying are reported to be reduced with long-term use, most likely through rapid tachyphylaxis at the level of vagal nerve activation. Based on recent anecdotal reports, there are concerns that delayed gastric emptying from GLP-1 agonists can increase the risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents during general anaesthesia and deep sedation. Patient taking GLP-1 agonists are more likely to have increased residual gastric contents as predicted by adverse gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, abdominal distension).

The use of GLP-1 agonists in paediatrics has primarily been reported for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. The published literature on GLP-1 agonists in paediatrics is predominantly from paediatric patients 10 to 18 years old and concerns are similar to those reported in adults. During the conduct of general anaesthesia/deep sedation, children on GLP-1 agonists have similar gastrointestinal adverse events at a rate similar to adults.

In a review of the literature, the ASA Task Force on Preoperative Fasting found that, beyond a few case reports, there was little evidence for guidance on preoperative management of GLP-1 agonists. Nevertheless, they made recommendations for elective procedures. In the case of urgent or emergent procedures, they suggested treating the patient as ‘full stomach’.

If the patient’s GLP-1 agonists prescribed for diabetes management are held for longer than the dosing schedule, the guidelines urge surgeons to consider consulting an endocrinologist for bridging the antidiabetic therapy in order to avoid hyperglycaemia.

They further recommend that if gastrointestinal symptoms, such as severe nausea/vomiting/retching, abdominal bloating, or abdominal pain, are present, surgeons should consider delaying elective procedures. If the patient has no gastrointestinal symptoms and the GLP-1 agonists have been held as advised, the surgical team can carry on as normal.

Source: American Society of Anesthesiologists

Categories : GastrointestinalTags :

A Common Tricyclic Drug can Improve IBS Symptoms

On By ModernMedia
Source: CC0

A cheap and widely available prescription drug can improve symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in patients seen in GP surgeries, according to research findings published in The Lancet and presented today at UEG Week 2023. 

Amitriptyline, a tricyclic which is commonly used at low doses for a range of health concerns, has been found to improve irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms too, according to the results of the ATLANTIS trial. 

The study was conducted in primary care, with GPs prescribing the drug and patients managing their own dose based on the severity of their symptoms, using an adjustment document designed for the trial. Most people with IBS are seen and managed in primary care by their GP, which means that the results of this trial are likely to be applicable to many people with the condition. 

Led by researchers at the Universities of Leeds, Southampton, and Bristol and funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), the study showed that patients taking amitriptyline were almost twice as likely to report an overall improvement in symptoms as those taking a placebo. 

Now the trial team is recommending that GPs support their patients with IBS to use amitriptyline to manage their symptoms – and has made the dose adjustment document available for clinicians and patients. 

Co-chief Investigator Alexander Ford, Professor of Gastroenterology in the University of Leeds’s School of Medicine, said: “Amitriptyline is an effective treatment for IBS and is safe and well tolerated. This new rigorously conducted research indicates that general practitioners should support patients in primary care to try low-dose amitriptyline if their IBS symptoms haven’t improved with recommended first-line treatments.” 

Most treatments for IBS, which affects around 1 in 20 people, only have a modest effect and people often have ongoing troublesome symptoms. 

Amitriptyline was originally used at high doses to treat depression, but is now superseded by newer and better antidepressants.  

Previous small trials of low-dose tricyclic antidepressants for IBS suggested a possible benefit in patients seen in hospital clinics, who often have more difficult to treat symptoms, but this new study is the first randomised controlled trial of low-dose amitriptyline versus a placebo tablet for IBS in primary care. It is also the largest trial of amitriptyline for IBS undertaken worldwide. 

GPs already prescribe low-dose amitriptyline to treat chronic nerve and back pain, and to help prevent migraine attacks. NICE guidelines currently state that GPs could consider using a low dose tricyclic, like amitriptyline, for IBS but, until now, the evidence for a benefit has been uncertain. 

Based on the results of the trial, which showed a clear benefit of amitriptyline, GPs can offer low-dose amitriptyline to people with IBS as part of shared decision making if symptoms don’t improve with first-line treatments.   

Co-chief Investigator Hazel Everitt, Professor of Primary Care Research at the Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, said: “Prior to ATLANTIS, GPs haven’t often prescribed amitriptyline for IBS as the research evidence was uncertain, but our new research provides good evidence of benefit. 

 “GPs already prescribe low-dose amitriptyline for other conditions, such as chronic pain and poor sleep, and when we interviewed GPs as part of this research, they were willing to prescribe it for IBS if the research evidence supported this. Participants were also keen to have another option to try to help their IBS symptoms and most were happy to self-adjust their dose depending on symptoms and side effects.’’ 

Some 463 people with IBS took part, recruited from 55 general practices across the UK.  

Participants were put at random into two groups – those receiving amitriptyline and those receiving a placebo. Participants controlled how many tablets of the trial medication they took, receiving support via the patient dose adjustment document that was developed with patient representatives especially for this trial. This enabled participants to increase or decrease the number of tablets based on their IBS symptoms and any side effects experienced.  

IBS scores were measured using the IBS-SSS scale. Amitriptyline participants scored a 99-point improvement compared with a 69-point improvement among placebo participants. 

Participants taking amitriptyline reported a bigger improvement in their symptom scores after six months compared with those taking a placebo. Those taking amitriptyline were almost twice as likely as those taking a placebo to report an overall improvement in IBS symptoms, with amitriptyline performing better across a wide range of IBS symptom measures. 

Researchers monitored participants’ anxiety or depression scores and found that they were not altered – suggesting that the beneficial effects of the medication were via the gut, not because of any effect as an antidepressant. 

No safety concerns were identified and side effects in people on amitriptyline were mostly mild, such as a dry mouth in the morning. 

Matthew Ridd, GP and Professor of Primary Health Care at the Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, said: “Pragmatic trials like this are always challenging to do in primary care and the team worked hard to overcome the additional challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic.  It’s fantastic that we’ve found that amitriptyline is an effective and safe option for patients with IBS to try.” 

Amanda Farrin, Professor of Clinical Trials and Evaluation of Complex Interventions, who leads the Complex Intervention Division of the Leeds Clinical Trials Research Unit, said: “The participants in the ATLANTIS trial had moderate to severe symptoms and an average duration of IBS of 10 years. The fact that amitriptyline had such a big effect over a placebo is significant because it can help improve the quality of life of patients with this condition.” 

Professor Andrew Farmer, Director NIHR’s Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme, said: “The results of this study are hugely encouraging. It shows that a drug already widely available to treat a number of other conditions appears to be safe and effective for people with IBS. The findings the research team have shared around the adjustment of dosages can be tremendously helpful to GPs in guiding them when treating patients. 

“IBS affects a significant number of people in the UK and can have a debilitating effect on their day-to-day lives. This is another excellent example of how high-quality research can lead to positive changes in health and social care practice and treatments for the benefit of patients and healthcare professionals.” 

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Gastrointestinal Metabolic DisordersTags :

For Weight Loss, the Side Effects of GLP-1 Agonists can be Hard to Stomach

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Andres Ayrton on Pexels

GLP-1 agonists are being lauded as game-changers in the fight against obesity, but GLP-1 agonist drugs like semaglutide may come with a heightened risk of severe gastrointestinal problems, according to new research published in JAMA.

Designing their study for the side effects rather than the efficacy of the drugs, the researchers found that GLP-1 agonists are associated with an increased risk of serious medical conditions including gastroparesis (stomach paralysis), pancreatitis and bowel obstruction.

While previous studies highlighted some of these risks in patients with diabetes, this study from the University of British Columbia is the first large, population-level study to examine adverse gastrointestinal events in non-diabetic patients using the drugs specifically for weight loss.

“Given the wide use of these drugs, these adverse events, although rare, must be considered by patients thinking about using them for weight loss,” said first author Mohit Sodhi, a graduate of UBC’s experimental medicine program and fourth year UBC medical student studying the adverse events of commonly prescribed medications. “The risk calculus will differ depending on whether a patient is using these drugs for diabetes, obesity or just general weight loss. People who are otherwise healthy may be less willing to accept these potentially serious adverse events.”

GLP-1 agonists have exploded in popularity over the past decade as an off-label weight-loss tool, reaching approximately 40 million prescriptions in the US in 2022.

It was only in 2021 that some forms of the medications were approved as a treatment for obesity. However, randomised clinical trials examining the efficacy of the medications for weight loss were not designed to capture rare gastrointestinal events due to their small sample sizes and short follow-up periods.

“There have been anecdotal reports of some patients using these drugs for weight loss and then presenting with repeated episodes of nausea and vomiting secondary to a condition referred to as gastroparesis,” said senior author Dr Mahyar Etminan, an epidemiologist and associate professor in the department of ophthalmology and visual sciences at the UBC faculty of medicine. “But until now, there hasn’t been any data from large epidemiologic studies.”

To help fill this knowledge gap, UBC researchers examined health insurance claim records for approximately 16 million US patients and looked at people prescribed either semaglutide or liraglutide, two main GLP-1 agonists, between 2006 and 2020. They included patients with a recent history of obesity, and excluded those with diabetes or who had been prescribed another antidiabetic drug.

The researchers analysed the records to see how many patients developed one of four gastrointestinal conditions, and compared that rate to patients using another weight-loss drug, bupropion-naltrexone. Compared to bupropion-naltrexone, GLP-1 agonists were associated with a:

  • 9.09 times higher risk of pancreatitis, which can cause severe abdominal pain and, in some cases, require hospitalisation and surgery.
  • 4.22 times higher risk of bowel obstruction, resulting in symptoms like cramping, bloating, nausea and vomiting. Depending on the severity, surgery may be required.
  • 3.67 times higher risk of gastroparesis, limiting the passage of food from the stomach to the small intestine and results in symptoms like vomiting, nausea and abdominal pain.

Additionally, the study found a non-significant higher incidence of biliary disease.

The researchers say that although the events are rare, with millions around the world using the drugs, it could still lead to hundreds of thousands of people experiencing these conditions.

“These drugs are becoming increasingly accessible, and it is concerning that, in some cases, people can simply go online and order these kinds of medications when they may not have a full understanding of what could potentially happen. This goes directly against the mantra of informed consent,” said Sodhi.

In the meantime, the researchers hope that regulatory agencies and drug makers will consider updating the warning labels for their products, which currently don’t include the risk of gastroparesis.

“This is critical information for patients to know so they can seek timely medical attention and avoid serious consequences,” said Sodhi.

Source: University of British Columbia

Categories : Gastrointestinal Immune SystemTags :

Atopic Dermatitis Increases Risk of New-onset IBD

On By ModernMedia
Source: CC0

Adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a 34% increased risk of developing new-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared to those without the skin condition, according to a new recently published in JAMA Dermatology. The study also shows for children, the risk increase is 44%. Additionally, as the severity of AD increased, the risk of developing IBD rose.

These findings clear up ambiguity from previous research, especially among populations of children and between the different types of IBD: ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. While IBD is located in the gut and AD affects the skin, both diseases are driven by the immune system and are categorised by severe inflammation. Insight offered from this study from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania could lead to new treatments for both IBD and AD.

“It is imperative for clinicians to understand atopic dermatitis and the trajectory of our patients with it in order to provide the best standard of care,” said senior author Joel M Gelfand, MD, dermatology professor at Penn. “There are new and better treatments for AD today, and there will likely continue to be more. But providers have to understand how those treatments could impact other autoimmune diseases. For patients with AD and another autoimmune disease, some currently available medications can exacerbate symptoms of their other disease or can help treat two immune diseases at the same time.”

While this is not the first study to explore AD and IBD, its size, with one million adult and child participants with AD drawn from a UK medical database, and its separation between ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease advances previous research.

When looking at ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease separately, AD was not linked to higher ulcerative colitis in children unless the kids had severe AD. Children with AD, however, had a 54–97% increased relative risk of Crohn’s disease, and among children with severe AD, their risk was roughly five times higher. Results among adults were more straightforward. Adults with AD had a 32% increased relative risk of ulcerative colitis and a 36% increased relative risk of Crohn’s disease. Gelfand notes that the absolute extra risk of developing IBD in individuals with AD is still quite small, but the association is meaningful in better understanding health outcomes in AD. Moreover, since millions of people have AD, this small increase in risk spread among many people is likely important from a public health perspective.

Although Penn researchers did not look at the root cause of IBD linked to AD, they have strong hypotheses about the links.

“AD and IBD can cause changes in the microbiome, chronic inflammation, and the dysfunction in the skin and gut barrier respectively,” said Gelfand, who is also the director of the Center for Clinical Sciences in Dermatology at Penn. “There are also specific cytokines, certain kinds of proteins, that play a role in immune system activity and that seem to be related to AD and IBD. For example, we think dysfunction of types of T cells common to both AD and IBD, could be the culprits. Those need to be explored further to uncover both what’s happening at a microscopic level and what proteins or structures could be targeted to treat one or both conditions.”

As a leading expert on psoriasis, a disease known to be tied to IBD genetically, Gelfand is well aware of how closely skin health can affect other parts of the body. He and his colleagues are also studying AD’s relationship to infections, neurologic and psychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular disease.

“Investigating the relationship between skin diseases and other diseases doesn’t just offer new insight into how these diseases can affect a patient with both, but these studies are especially powerful because they also highlight unique characteristics of each disease and how they behave individually,” Gelfand shared.

Source: University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine

Categories : Cancer GastrointestinalTags :

Gastric Reflux without Oesophagitis does not Increase Cancer Risk

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay cc0

Reflux disease manifests as acid regurgitation and heartburn and is a known risk factor for oesophageal cancer. However, a new study published in The BMJ by researchers at Karolinska Institutet now reports that the majority of patients do not have a higher risk of cancer. A large-scale study from three Nordic countries shows that the cancer risk is only elevated in patients whom gastroscopy reveals to have changes in the oesophageal mucosa.

“This is a gratifying result since reflux disease is a very common condition and most patients are found to have a completely normal mucus membrane on gastroscopic examination,” says the study’s first author Dag Holmberg, Karolinska Institutet researcher and resident doctor of surgery at Karolinska University Hospital in Sweden.

In reflux disease, acidic stomach contents leak into the oesophagus. This can sometimes cause oesophagitis, inflammation in the oesophageal mucus membrane, which is diagnosed via gastroscopy. It is common knowledge that reflux disease increases the risk of oesophageal cancer, but what the cancer risk is for patients with normal mucosa has remained unknown.

Symptoms generally persist

The symptoms of reflux disease can come and go but generally persist, which means that many patients frequently seek medical attention and often undergo repeated gastroscopies to detect mucosal lesions or prodromal cancer.

“Our study suggests that these repeated gastroscopies are probably unnecessary for people with reflux disease who have a normal oesophageal mucosa,” says Dr Holmberg. “These findings should be reassuring for this large patient group and can guide GPs who often treat them.”

The present study is based on national health data registries in Sweden, Denmark and Finland, and included over 285 000 individuals with reflux disease and no gastroscopic evidence of oesophagitis. The patients were followed for up to 31 years and the researchers registered all cases of oesophageal cancer.

The cancer risk was then compared with that for individuals from the general population matched by age and sex and at the same period in the three countries. No increased risk of oesophageal cancer was observed in patients with reflux disease and a normal mucus membrane.

Increased risk in patients with oesophagitis

By way of comparison, the researchers also analysed the cancer risk in over 200 000 individuals with reflux disease and oesophagitis. These people were at a clearly increased relative risk of developing oesophageal cancer.

“We now intend to examine what factors other than oesophagitis can be linked to tumour growth in people with reflux disease,” says the study’s last author Jesper Lagergren, professor of surgery at Karolinska Institutet.

Source: Karolinska Institutet

Categories : GastrointestinalTags :

Silent but Violent: Taurine-consuming Bacteria Protects the Gut with Toxic Gas

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Pablo Stanic on Unsplash

Researchers have discovered a new intestinal bacterim that feeds exclusively on taurine and produces the foul-smelling gas hydrogen sulfide. The results, currently published in Nature Communications, show that Taurinivorans muris protects against Klebsiella and Salmonella, two important pathogens.

Chemical warfare in the gut

One of the ways the gut microbiome helps regulated health is in contributing to the levels of hydrogen sulfide – the toxic gas responsible for foul-smelling farts. Having small amounts of hydrogen sulfide in the gut is a good thing; in fact, it’s essential for a number of physiological processes, and can even protect against pathogens. Hydrogen sulfide-producing microbes in the gut may help “choke out” oxygen-dependent pathogens such as Klebsiella, making it harder for them to colonise. However, excessive levels can have negative consequences and have been associated with gut inflammation and damage to the intestinal lining.

Taurine plays yet another a role

The bacterium Bilophila wadsworthia is one of the most important taurine utilizers in humans. In the current study, researchers led by Alexander Loy at CeMESS, the Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science of the University of Vienna, have discovered a new genus of hydrogen sulfide-producing bacteria in the mouse intestine. “The bacterium we described has a rather unbalanced diet,” explains Loy, “it specialises in consuming taurine.” Taurine is a semi-essential amino acid, synthesised in small amounts in the liver but mostly obtained through the diet – especially meat, dairy and seafood. 

Like hydrogen sulfide, taurine is implicated in a plethora of physiological processes. Recent studies have found a link between taurine and healthy ageing – it seems this nutrient may stave away age-related disease. In light of these findings, the discovery of a new gut microbe that feeds exclusively on taurine (aptly named Taurinivorans muris) is another piece of an exciting puzzle. “By isolating the first taurine degrader in the mouse gut, we’re one step closer to understanding how these gut microbes mediate animal and human health” explains Huimin Ye, lead author of the study. 

To access sufficient taurine in the gut, however, Taurinivorans muris needs the help of other gut microbes to release it from bile acids. Taurine-containing bile acids are produced in the liver and are increasingly released into the intestine during a high-fat diet to help our body digest fats. The activities of the bacteria in the intestine in turn influence the bile acid metabolism in the liver. The results of the Viennese researchers therefore also contribute to a better understanding of these complex interactions in bile acid metabolism, which has an impact on processes and diseases throughout the body.

Taurine-degrading microbes choke out pathogens

One of the most important functions of the symbiotic microbes in the gut is to defend against pathogens. The microbiome has a versatile arsenal of protective mechanisms – and utilising taurine to create hydrogen sulfide is one of them. “Hydrogen sulfide may suppress the oxygen-dependent metabolism of some pathogens,” explains Ye. In the present study, the researchers found that Taurinivorans muris has a protective role against Klebsiella and Salmonella, two important gut pathogens. “The protective mechanism of Taurinivorans muris against pathogens may be via hydrogen sulfide but is essentially not yet fully understood” adds Alexander Loy. Taurine is one of the most important sources of hydrogen sulfide production in the gut. The study thus generates basic knowledge on the physiological interactions between the different gut microbes and their hosts, which is necessary to develop new microbiome-based therapies.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : GastrointestinalTags :

Turmeric as Effective as Omeprazole for Treating Dyspepsia, Comparative Study Suggests

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay cc0

A natural compound found in the culinary spice turmeric may be as effective as the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole for treating indigestion symptoms, suggests the first study of its kind, published online in the journal BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

Turmeric is derived from the root of the Curcuma longa plant. The spice contains a naturally active compound called curcumin thought to have anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, and has long been used as a medicinal remedy, including for the treatment of indigestion, in South East Asia. 

But it’s not clear how well it compares with conventional drugs for this indication, largely because there have been no head to head studies.

The researchers therefore randomly assigned 206 patients aged 18–70 with recurrent upset stomach (functional dyspepsia) of unknown cause, recruited from hospitals in Thailand between 2019 and 2021, to one of three treatment groups for a period of 28 days.

These were: turmeric (two large 250mg capsules of curcumin 4 times a day) and one small dummy capsule; omeprazole (one small 20mg capsule daily and two large dummy capsules 4 times a day; and turmeric plus omeprazole.

PPIs such as omeprazole are used to treat functional dyspepsia, the symptoms of which include postprandial fullness, early satiety, and pain and/or epigastric pain.

But long term use of PPIs has been linked to increased fracture risk, micronutrient deficiencies, and a heightened risk of infections, note the researchers.

Of the 206 patients enrolled, 151 completed the study, with 20 in the curcumin group;19 in the omeprazole group; and 16 in the combined treatment group, dropping out. 

Patients in all three groups had similar clinical characteristics and indigestion scores, as assessed by the Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment score or SODA, at the start of the trial. Patients were reassessed after 28 days and then again after 56 days.

SODA scores indicated significant reductions in symptom severity by day 28 for pain (−4.83, –5.46 and −6.22) and other symptoms (−2.22, –2.32, and −2.31) for those in the combined, curcumin alone, and omeprazole alone groups, respectively. 

These improvements were even stronger after 56 days for pain (−7.19, –8.07 and −8.85, respectively) and other symptoms (−4.09, –4.12 and −3.71, respectively). 

SODA also captures satisfaction scores: these scarcely changed over time among the curcumin users, which might possibly be related to its taste and/or smell, suggest the researchers.

No serious side effects were reported, although liver function tests indicated some level of deterioration among curcumin users carrying excess weight, note the researchers.

They acknowledge the small size of the study, as well as several other limitations, including the short intervention period and lack of long-term monitoring data. Further larger, long term studies are needed, they say.

Nevertheless, they conclude: “This multicentre randomised controlled trial provides highly reliable evidence for the treatment of functional dyspepsia,” adding that “the new findings from our study may justify considering curcumin in clinical practice.”

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Cancer GastrointestinalTags :

Statins Might Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Those with Ulcerative Colitis

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

New research published in eClinicalMedicine suggests that statins might protect patients with ulcerative colitis from developing and dying from colorectal cancer. The study, by Karolinska Insitut researchers, also found that statin treatment was associated with a lower risk of death regardless of cause in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease.

First author Jiangwei Sun notes that previous studies have shown that the risk of colorectal cancer in patients with IBD, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, is 50% higher than in the general population. This is likely to be because of the chronic gut inflammation that these patients have. Researchers have long sought drugs that can reduce the inflammation-related cancer risk.

“Even though more studies are needed to confirm our results, our study suggests that statins can prevent colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which is a high-risk group for this kind of cancer,” says Dr Sun.

The observational study conducted by Dr Sun and his colleagues compared over 10 500 IBD patients from around the country, of whom half were statin users; the other half of the group, who were matched with the first, were not. After a follow-up period of, on average, 5.6 years, 70 of the statin group and 90 of the non-statin group had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

The effect increased over time

The protective effect was directly proportional to the length of time the patient had been on statins and could be demonstrated after two years’ treatment.

There were also fewer deaths from colorectal cancer in the statin group (20) than in the non-statin group (37) during the study period, and deaths regardless of cause (529 versus 719).

The study shows that some 200 IBD patients need to be treated with statins to avoid one case of colorectal cancer or death from the cancer within ten years of treatment onset. The protective effect was only statistically valid for patients with ulcerative colitis.

“We think this is because the study contained fewer patients with Crohn’s disease,” explains Dr Sun. “More and larger studies compiling data from patient populations in many countries will probably be needed to achieve statistical significance for Crohn’s disease.”

Significantly fewer deaths

To avoid death regardless of cause during the same ten-year period, the number of treated patients dropped to 20, on account of how statins also protect against more common conditions, such as cardiovascular disease. Statins were linked to fewer deaths in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patients.

The study was based on the ESPRESSO-cohort, which is run by its initiative-taker Jonas F Ludvigsson, paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor at Karolinska Institutet, and the study’s last author.

“In that we can combine tissue data from patients with colorectal cancer with data from Swedish health registries, we’re uniquely placed to study the long-term effects of drugs for IBD,” he says. “Our hope is that these studies will improve the care of IBD patients.”

The most solid evidence so far

According to the researchers, the new results provide the most solid evidence so far that statins could be an effective prophylactic for colorectal cancer among people with IBD. However, more knowledge must be gathered before the treatment can be recommended in general guidelines.

“More studies are needed to ascertain if there is a causal relationship, at what point of the pathological process statins should be administered, what a reasonable dose would be and how long treatment needs to last if it’s to be of benefit,” says Dr Sun.

Source: Karolinska Institut