Category: Exercise

Workouts – or Disturbed Sleep – Impact Brain Activity Weeks Later

Photo by Ketut Subiyanto on Pexels

In a rare, longitudinal study, researchers from Aalto University and the University of Oulu tracked one person’s brain and behavioural activity for five months using brain scans and data from wearable devices and smartphones. The results appear in PLOS Biology.

“We wanted to go beyond isolated events,” says research leader (and study participant) Ana Triana. “Our behaviour and mental states are constantly shaped by our environment and experiences. Yet, we know little about the response of brain functional connectivity to environmental, physiological, and behavioural changes on different timescales, from days to months.”

The study found that the brain does not respond to daily life in immediate, isolated bursts. Instead, brain activity evolves in response to sleep patterns, physical activity, mood, and respiration rate over many days. This suggests that even a workout or a restless night from last week could still affect the brain – and therefore attention, cognition and memory – well into next week.

The research also revealed a strong link between heart rate variability – a measure of the heart’s adaptability – and brain connectivity, particularly during rest. This suggests that impacts on the body’s relaxation response, like stress management techniques, could shape brain wiring even when not actively concentrating on a task. Physical activity was also found to positively influence the way brain regions interact, potentially impacting memory and cognitive flexibility. Even subtle shifts in mood and heart rate left lasting imprints for up to 15 days.

Study goes beyond a snapshot

The research is unusual in that few brain studies involve detailed monitoring over days and weeks. “The use of wearable technology was crucial,” says Triana. “Brain scans are useful tools, but a snapshot of someone lying still for half an hour can only show so much. Our brains do not work in isolation.”

Triana was herself the subject of the research, monitored as she went about her daily life. Her unique role as both lead author and study participant added complexity, but also brought firsthand insights into how best to maintain research integrity over several months of personalised data collection.  Data from the devices and twice-weekly brain scans were complemented by qualitative data from mood surveys. 

The researchers identified two distinct response patterns: a short-term wave lasting under seven days and a long-term wave up to 15 days. The former reflects rapid adaptations, like how focus is impacted by poor sleep, but it recovers quickly. The long wave suggests more gradual, lasting effects, particularly in areas tied to attention and memory. 

Single-subject studies offer opportunities for improving mental health care 

The researchers hope their innovative approach will inspire future studies that combine brain data with everyday life to help personalise mental health treatment. 

“We must bring data from daily life into the lab to see the full picture of how our habits shape the brain, but surveys can be tiring and inaccurate,” says study co-author, neuroscientist and physician Dr Nick Hayward. “Combining concurrent physiology with repeated brain scans in one person is crucial. Our approach gives context to neuroscience and delivers very fine detail to our understanding of the brain.”

The study is also a proof-of-concept for patient research. Tracking brain changes in real time could help detect neurological disorders early, especially mental health conditions where subtle signs might be missed.

“Linking brain activity with physiological and environmental data could revolutionise personalised healthcare, opening doors for earlier interventions and better outcomes,” says Triana.

Source: Aalto University

Even Moderate Amounts of Exercise May Reduce Risk for Atrial Fibrillation

Photo by Robert Ruggiero on Unsplash

Adding an extra hour every week of physical activity may lower the chance of developing the most common type of irregular heartbeat (arryhthmia) by 11%, a new study shows.

Led by researchers at NYU Langone Health, the investigation focused on atrial fibrillation. While past studies have linked exercise to reduced risk of this type of arrhythmia, nearly all of these analyses have relied on participants’ often inaccurate estimates of their own activity levels, the authors say.

To avert this flaw, the current study team used data recorded from the fitness tracker Fitbit to objectively measure physical activity in more than 6000 men and women across the United States. The results showed that those with higher amounts of weekly physical activity were less likely to develop atrial fibrillation. Notably, the researchers say, even modest amounts of moderate to vigorous exercise, which can range from taking a brisk walk or cleaning the house to swimming laps or jogging, were associated with reduced risk.

Specifically, study participants who averaged between 2.5 and 5 hours per week, the minimum amount recommended by the American Heart Association, showed a 60% lower risk of developing atrial fibrillation. Those who averaged greater than 5 hours had a slightly greater (65%) reduction.

“Our findings make clear that you do not need to start running marathons to help prevent atrial fibrillation and other forms of heart disease,” said preventive cardiologist Sean P. Heffron, MD, the study senior author. “Just keeping moderately active can, over time, add up to major benefits for maintaining a healthy heart,” added Dr Heffron, an assistant professor in the Department of Medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Dr. Heffron notes that in the sole earlier study that used activity monitors to investigate atrial fibrillation, researchers provided Fitbit-style monitors to the participants and tracked them for only a week, an approach that may not have accurately captured their normal workout habits. The new investigation, which the authors say is the largest of its kind to date, assessed participants for a full year and included only those who already owned the devices.

A report on the findings will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association on November 16.

From data collected as part of the All of Us Research Program, the authors of the current study assessed physical activity in the subset (6086 people) who used a Fitbit device and permitted their Fitbit and electronic health records to be linked to their All of Us data. The team tracked activity information for a year as a baseline and then followed up for another five years to identify those who were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. The researchers also took into account factors known to contribute to the condition, such as age, sex, and a history of high blood pressure.

“These results highlight the value of Fitbits and similar monitors in medical research,” said study lead author Souptik Barua, PhD, an assistant professor in the Department of Medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. “By offering an objective way to measure exercise for years at a time, these tools can provide deeper insight into how different patterns of activity can impact health.”

For example, says Dr Barua, the research team next plans to explore whether working out in the morning or at night may have different effects on heart health.

He cautions that since many Fitbit owners in the study were college-educated White women, the investigation assessed a less-diverse group than that of the overall All of Us population. The program is now providing free devices to participants in underrepresented communities for future investigations.

Dr. Barua also cautions that the study was not designed to tell whether exercise alone directly reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation, nor to detect how that might come about or what other factors, such as income or educational status, might be in play in the reduced risk. However, the association between exercise “doses” and the development of the condition in the study participants was strong.

Source: NYU Langone Health / NYU Grossman School of Medicine

An Extra Five Minutes of Exercise a Day could Reduce Blood Pressure

Photo by Teona Swift on Unsplash

New research suggests that adding a small amount of daily physical activity, such as uphill walking or stair-climbing, may help to lower blood pressure. The findings were published in Circulation

Just five minutes of activity a day was estimated to potentially reduce blood pressure, while replacing sedentary behaviours with 20–27 minutes of exercise per day, including uphill walking, stair-climbing, running and cycling, was also estimated to lead to a clinically meaningful reduction in blood pressure. The study was done by experts from the ProPASS (Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep) Consortium, an international academic collaboration led by the University of Sydney and University College London (UCL)

Joint senior author Professor Emmanuel Stamatakis, Director of the ProPASS Consortium said: “High blood pressure is one of the biggest health issues globally, but unlike some major causes of cardiovascular mortality there may be relatively accessible ways to tackle the problem in addition to medication.”

“The finding that doing as little as five extra minutes of exercise per day could be associated with measurably lower blood pressure readings emphasises how powerful short bouts of higher intensity movement could be for blood pressure management.”

The research team analysed health data from 14 761 volunteers in five countries to see how replacing one type of movement behaviour with another across the day is associated with blood pressure.

Each participant used a wearable accelerometer device on their thigh to measure their activity and blood pressure throughout the day and night. 

Daily activity was split into six categories: sleep, sedentary behaviour (such as sitting), slow walking, fast walking, standing, and more vigorous exercise such as running, cycling or stair climbing.

The team modelled statistically what would happen if an individual changed various amounts of one behaviour for another in order to estimate the effect on blood pressure for each scenario and found that replacing sedentary behaviour with 20-27 minutes of exercise per day could potentially reduce cardiovascular disease by up to 28 percent at a population level.

First author Dr Jo Blodgett from UCL said: “Our findings suggest that, for most people, exercise is key to reducing blood pressure, rather than less strenuous forms of movement such as walking.

“The good news is that whatever your physical ability, it doesn’t take long to have a positive effect on blood pressure. What’s unique about our exercise variable is that it includes all exercise-like activities, from running for a bus or a short cycling errand, many of which can be integrated into daily routines.

“For those who don’t do a lot of exercise, walking did still have some positive benefits for blood pressure. But if you want to change your blood pressure, putting more demand on the cardiovascular system through exercise will have the greatest effect.”

Professor Mark Hamer, joint senior author of the study and ProPASS Deputy Director from UCL, said: “Our findings show how powerful research platforms like the ProPASS consortium are for identifying relatively subtle patterns of exercise, sleep, and sedentary behaviour, that have  significant clinical and public health importance.”

Source: University of Sydney

Study Suggests that High-intensity Exercise Suppresses Appetite – Especially in Women

Photo by Ketut Subiyanto on Unsplash

A vigorous workout does more to suppress hunger levels in healthy adults than does moderate exercise, and females may be especially susceptible to this response, according to a small study published in the Journal of the Endocrine Society.

The study examines the effects of exercise intensity on ghrelin levels and appetite between men and women. Ghrelin is known as the “hunger hormone” and is associated with perceptions of hunger.

“We found that high intensity exercise suppressed ghrelin levels more than moderate intensity exercise,” said lead author Kara Anderson, PhD, of the University of Virginia. “In addition, we found that individuals felt ‘less hungry’ after high intensity exercise compared to moderate intensity exercise.”

Ghrelin circulates in acylated (AG) and deacylated (DAG) forms, which are known to affect appetite. Data on the impact of exercise intensity on AG and DAG levels, and their effects on appetite, is sparse and primarily limited to males, the study noted.

To address this shortfall, the study examined eight males and six females. Participants fasted overnight and then completed exercises of varying intensity levels, determined by measurements of blood lactate, followed by self-reported measurements of appetite.

Females had higher levels of total ghrelin at baseline compared with males, the study noted. But only females demonstrated “significantly reduced AG” following the intense exercise, according to the findings.

“We found that moderate intensity either did not change ghrelin levels or led to a net increase,” the study noted. These findings suggest that exercise above the lactate threshold “may be necessary to elicit a suppression in ghrelin.”

Researchers also acknowledged that more work is needed to determine the extent to which the effects of exercise differ by sex. Ghrelin has been shown to have wide-ranging biological effects in areas including energy balance, appetite, glucose homeostasis, immune function, sleep, and memory.

“Exercise should be thought of as a ‘drug,’ where the ‘dose’ should be customised based on an individual’s personal goals,” Anderson said. “Our research suggests that high-intensity exercise may be important for appetite suppression, which can be particularly useful as part of a weight loss program.”

Source: The Endocrine Society

Outdoor Play Helps Protect Toddlers against Later Childhood Obesity

New research published in Acta Paediatrica suggests that children who engage in outdoor play during their preschool years have a lower risk of developing obesity later in childhood.

The study included children born in Japan during two weeks in January and July 2001. Of 53 575 children born, 42 812 had data on outdoor play habits at age 2.5 years. In a survey, parents were asked, “Where do your children usually play (excluding home residences and daycare centres attended)?” Available options for answers included “in my garden or on the grounds of my apartment complex,” “in parks,” “in natural areas such as fields, forests, and beaches,” “on the street,” “in shrines and temples,” “in playgrounds in department stores and supermarkets,” “other,” and “don’t play anywhere but inside my home.” If one or more of the first five items were chosen, a child was considered to have exposure to outdoor play—this was the case for 91% of the children.

In follow-up surveys when the children were seven years old, 31 743 of 42 812 (74%) children had height and weight data, with 10% classified as overweight or obese.

Compared with children without exposure to outdoor play, children with outdoor play habits had 15% lower odds of being overweight or obese, after adjusting for other influencing factors.

“We suggest that parents and caregivers encourage outdoor play habits in their children at an early age, as this may help prevent obesity later in life,” said corresponding author Takahiro Tsuge, MPH, of Kurashiki Medical Center.

Source: Wiley

Aerobic Exercise may Help Prevent the Brain Fog from Chemotherapy

Clinical trial reveals improved self-reported cognitive function in women with breast cancer who started an exercise program when initiating chemotherapy.

Photo by Ketut Subiyanto on Pexels

Many women who receive chemotherapy experience a decreased ability to remember, concentrate, and/or think – commonly referred to as “chemo-brain” or “brain fog” – both short- and long-term. In a recent clinical trial of women initiating chemotherapy for breast cancer, those who simultaneously started an aerobic exercise program self-reported greater improvements in cognitive function and quality of life compared with those receiving standard care. The findings are published by Wiley online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.

The study, called the Aerobic exercise and CogniTIVe functioning in women with breAsT cancEr (ACTIVATE) trial, included 57 Canadian women in Ottawa and Vancouver who were diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer and beginning chemotherapy. All women participated in 12–24 weeks of aerobic exercise: 28 started this exercise when initiating chemotherapy and 29 started after chemotherapy completion. Cognitive function assessments were conducted before chemotherapy initiation and after chemotherapy completion (therefore, before the latter group started the exercise program).

Women who participated in the aerobic exercise program during chemotherapy self-reported better cognitive functioning and felt their mental abilities improved compared with those who received standard care without exercise. Neuropsychological testing – a performance-based method used to measure a range of mental functions – revealed similar cognitive performance in the two groups after chemotherapy completion, however.

“Our findings strengthen the case for making exercise assessment, recommendation, and referral a routine part of cancer care; this may help empower women living with and beyond cancer to actively manage both their physical and mental health during and after treatment,” said lead author Jennifer Brunet, PhD, of the University of Ottawa.

Dr Brunet noted that many women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer remain insufficiently active, and there are limited exercise programs tailored to their needs. “To address this, we advocate for collaboration across various sectors – academic, healthcare, fitness, and community – to develop exercise programs specifically designed for women with breast cancer,” she said. “These programs should be easy to adopt and implement widely, helping to make the benefits of exercise more accessible to all women facing the challenges of cancer treatment and recovery.”

Source: Wiley

The Arms and Torso of Human Males Evolved to Throw a Punch

Photo by Hermes Rivera on Unsplash

In the animal kingdom, males develop specialised weapons such as deer antlers for competition when winning a fight is critical. Humans do too, according to new research from the University of Utah. Males’ upper bodies are built for more powerful punches than females’, says the study, published in the Journal of Experimental Biology, suggesting that fighting may have long been a part of our evolutionary history.

“In mammals in general,” says professor David Carrier of the School of Biological Sciences, “the difference between males and females is often greatest in the structures that are used as weapons.”

Assembling evidence

For years, Carrier has been exploring the hypothesis that generations of interpersonal male-male aggression long in the past have shaped structures in human bodies to specialise for success in fighting. Past work has shown that the proportions of the hand aren’t just for manual dexterity- they also protect the hand when it’s formed into a fist. Other studies looked at the strength of the bones of the face (as a likely target of a punch) and how our heels, planted on the ground, can confer additional upper body power.

“One of the predictions that comes out of those,” Carrier says, “is if we are specialised for punching, you might expect males to be particularly strong in the muscles that are associated with throwing a punch.”

Jeremy Morris, then a doctoral student and now an assistant professor at Wofford College, designed an experiment with Carrier, doctoral student Jenna Link and associate professor James C. Martin to explore the sexual dimorphism, or physical differences between men and women, of punching strength. It’s already known that males’ upper bodies, on average, have 75% more muscle mass and 90% more strength than females’. But it’s not known why.

“The general approach to understanding why sexual dimorphism evolves,” Morris says, “is to measure the actual differences in the muscles or the skeletons of males and females of a given species, and then look at the behaviours that might be driving those differences.”

Cranking through a punch

To avoid potential hand injury from a using punching bag, the researchers instead rigged up a hand crank that would mimic the motions of a punch. They also measured participants’ strength in pulling a line forward over their head, akin to the motion of throwing a spear. This tested an alternative hypothesis that males’ upper body strength may have developed for the purpose of throwing or spear hunting.

Twenty men and 19 women participated. “We had them fill out an activity questionnaire,” Morris says, “and they had to score in the ‘active’ range. So, we weren’t getting couch potatoes, we were getting people that were very fit and active.”

But even with roughly uniform levels of fitness, the males’ average power during a punching motion was 162% greater than females’, with the least-powerful man still stronger than the most powerful woman. Such a distinction between genders, Carrier says, develops with time and with purpose.

“It evolves slowly,” he says, “and this is a dramatic example of sexual dimorphism that’s consistent with males becoming more specialised for fighting, and males fighting in a particular way, which is throwing punches.”

They didn’t find the same magnitude of difference in overhead pulling strength, lending additional weight to the conclusion that males’ upper body strength is specialised for punching rather than throwing weapons.

Breaking a legacy of violence

It’s an uncomfortable thought to consider that men may be designed for fighting. That doesn’t mean, however, that men today are destined to live their ancestor’s violent lives.

“Human nature is also characterized by avoiding violence and finding ways to be cooperative and work together, to have empathy, to care for each other, right?” Carrier says. “There are two sides to who we are as a species. If our goal is to minimise all forms of violence in the future, then understanding our tendencies and what our nature really is, is going to help.”

Source: University of Utah

‘Push to Failure’ Works for Bigger Muscles, but not Strength

Photo by Jonathan Borba on Unsplash

When performing resistance training such as lifting weights, there’s a lot of interest in how close you push yourself to failure – the point where you can’t do another rep – and how it affects your results. While research has looked at this concept in different ways, to date, no meta-analysis has explored the pattern (ie, linear or non-linear) of how the distance from failure (measured by repetitions in reserve) affects changes in muscle strength and size.

As such, it’s still unclear how close to failure one needs to go to maximise muscle growth and strength.

Researchers from Florida Atlantic University and collaborators analyzed how training close to failure or not impacts muscle growth and strength. The study primarily looked at how training close to failure affects muscle growth in the main muscles used in an exercise. For example, if an individual was doing leg presses, the focus was on how training close to failure affects the quadriceps.

Researchers estimated the number of repetitions in reserve, which means how many more reps you could have done before reaching failure. They collected data from 55 various studies and ran detailed statistical analyses to see how different reps in reserve levels affected strength and muscle growth.

Results of the study, published in the journal Sports Medicine, found that how close you train to failure doesn’t have a clear impact on strength gains. Whether you stop far from failure or very close to it, your strength improvement appears to be similar. On the other hand, muscle size (hypertrophy) does seem to benefit from training closer to failure. The closer you are to failure when you stop your sets, the more muscle growth you tend to see.

“If you’re aiming for muscle growth, training closer to failure might be more effective. In other words, it doesn’t matter if you adjust training volume by changing sets or reps; the relationship between how close you train to failure and muscle growth remains the same,” said Michael C. Zourdos, Ph.D., senior author and professor and chair of the Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion within FAU’s Charles E. Schmidt College of Science. “For strength, how close you push to failure doesn’t seem to matter as much.”

The researchers suggest that individuals who aim to build muscle should work within a desired range of 0-5 reps short of failure for optimized muscle growth or while minimizing injury risk. For strength training, they suggest individuals should work toward heavier loads instead of pushing their muscles to failure. As such, they recommend that to train to gain strength, individuals should stop about 3-5 reps short of failure without applying additional physical strain on the body.

“Training closer to failure enhances the accuracy of self-reported repetitions in reserve,” said Zac P. Robinson, Ph.D., first author and a Ph.D. graduate of FAU’s Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion. “When people estimate how many reps they have left, this perception influences the weights they choose. If the estimation is off, they might use lighter weights than needed, which could limit strength gains. On the flip side, our meta-analysis shows that training closer to failure also leads to greater muscle growth. So, for the average individual, training close to failure may be the best option – as it seems to improve the accuracy of our perception of effort as well as gains in muscle size.”

Findings help underscore the difficulties of training close to failure, which can be tough and harder to recover from, potentially impacting long-term performance negatively. In addition, the researchers say that training closer to failure might better simulate the conditions and experiences of a maximal strength test, commonly used in strength training programs, rehabilitation and athletic performance assessments to gauge an individual’s strength capabilities and track progress over time. 

“As the load increases, motor patterns change, which means performing sets closer to failure can more closely mimic the demands of max strength assessments,” said Zourdos. “This approach aligns with the principle of specificity by exposing you to similar motor patterns and psychological challenges. Moreover, training near failure may also improve psychological factors like visualisation, which are important for achieving maximal strength.”

Results from the study could help guide future research and provide valuable insights for trainers on how proximity to failure affects muscle growth and strength. However, researchers say the exact numerical relationship between training close to failure and strength gain remains unclear and future studies should be deliberately designed to explore the continuous nature of the effects in larger samples. 

Source: Florida Atlantic University

Researchers Find New Clues as to Why Exercise Relieves Depression

Photo by Robert Ruggiero on Unsplash

While physical activity, especially aerobic exercise, is known to reduce depressive symptoms, the processes behind this have been poorly understood – until now. In a new review article published in Translational Psychiatry, researchers propose a novel hypothesis to understand the antidepressant effects of exercise. They believe that the process may hinge on motivation, which is very important for alleviating a number of symptoms of depression, such as anhedonia (a lack of interest or joy in life’s experiences), low energy and ‘brain fog’.

The team summarised research papers that explored the mechanisms of depression in both humans and animals and concluded that depression, especially anhedonia, is associated with elevated inflammation (caused by the body’s immune response). Importantly, inflammation is also linked to disrupted dopamine transmission. These biological changes may represent key processes leading to changes in motivation, and in particular a lower willingness to exert physical or mental effort.

Meanwhile, exercise reduces inflammation, boosts dopamine function, and enhances motivation. The researchers believe that this could be an important reason as to why exercise exerts an antidepressant effect.

Lead author, Dr Emily Hird (UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience) said: “The antidepressant effect of aerobic exercise has been convincingly demonstrated through randomised controlled trials, but its mechanism is not well understood. This is, in part, because it likely involves a variety of biological and psychological processes.

“For example, alongside its positive effect on inflammation, dopamine and reward processing, exercise also reduces oxidative stress and improves self-esteem and self-efficacy.

“However, we are proposing that exercise – particularly aerobic activities that make you sweaty and out of breath – decreases inflammation and boosts dopamine transmission, which in turn increases the desire to exert effort, and therefore boosts motivation generally.”

The team hope that this understanding of how exercise reduces symptoms of depression will help to inform the development of new treatment strategies – such as personalised exercise programmes.

Dr Hird said: “Understanding the mechanisms that underly the antidepressant effects of physical activity in depression could also inform our understanding of the mechanisms causing depression and the development of novel intervention strategies, in particular personalised intervention, and social prescribing.”

To further test their hypothesis, the researchers advise that large randomised controlled trials need to be conducted that assess the antidepressant effects of exercise, whilst also measuring the effect on variables including inflammation, dopamine transmission and motivation.

It would also be important to investigate any potential barriers to exercise.

Dr Hird said: “Addressing barriers to exercise – particularly in people with depression – is crucial, as regular physical activity may be able to alleviate symptoms, enhance mood and empower individuals on their path to recovery. As part of this, finding strategies to encourage exercise is key.”

The team are now running a trial based on the hypothesis proposed in the review, which will involve 250 participants aged 18 to 60 and is funded by a Wellcome Mental Health Award.

Source: University College London

Physical Training Improves Quality of Life in Advanced Breast Cancer

Photo by Mikhail Nilov

An international randomised multicentre study has shown that targeted physical training can improve the quality of life of patients with metastatic breast cancer and alleviate fatigue. In the course of the training programme, which included two sessions per week over nine months, disease- and therapy-related symptoms were markedly reduced, which was associated with a improved quality of life compared to the control group.

The German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) was significantly involved in the study, together with the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg and Heidelberg University Hospital.

Maintaining or improving quality of life and alleviating fatigue are important goals in the care of cancer patients. Not only the disease itself, but also the necessary therapies can severely impair quality of life. Many patients suffer from fatigue syndrome, which is characterised by persistent physical, emotional and mental exhaustion.

“Especially women with advanced cancers such as metastatic breast cancer, who usually receive long-term therapy, can benefit greatly from good management of disease- and therapy-related symptoms,” says Karen Steindorf, head of a research division at the DKFZ and NCT Heidelberg. “We hope that the encouraging results of our PREFERABLE-EFFECT study will help to ensure that as many patients as possible are offered the opportunity to take part in a targeted training programme.”

Targeted activation, rather than rest, is the appropriate measure to counter fatigue and other stressful symptoms. This has already been proven in studies for patients in the early stages of breast cancer, but there is still no evidence of a corresponding benefit for advanced disease. The PREFERABLE-EFFECT study has now provided this proof.

A total of 355 women and 2 men with metastatic breast cancer were included in the randomized controlled trial. All study participants received basic exercise recommendations and were fitted with an activity tracker to record the amount of exercise they did in everyday life. “The training group of 178 participants also took part in an individually adapted and therapeutically supervised training programme twice a week, which included exercises to strengthen balance, muscle strength and endurance. In the last three months, one of the two training sessions was also carried out with the help of an app,” explains Joachim Wiskemann from Heidelberg University Hospital, whose working group examined and supervised the Heidelberg study participants in terms of sports therapy.

At the start of the study and after 3, 6 and 9 months, the participants were asked about their quality of life using a standardised questionnaire that took into account physical, mental and emotional aspects of quality of life. In addition, a standardised questionnaire was used to objectify fatigue symptoms. Physical fitness was tested at the beginning and at three-month intervals on the bicycle ergometer.

The structured training programme led to a statistically significant improvement in quality of life and a significant reduction in fatigue. Complaints such as pain and shortness of breath decreased significantly over the course of the study. The fitness test was also better in the training group than in the control group.

“These are very encouraging training effects that the patients can feel in their everyday lives,” comments Karen Steindorf. “Structured training improves quality of life in a relevant way and enables women with advanced breast cancer to lead a more active life. We were also able to demonstrate greater participation in social life. Based on the PREFERABLE-EFFECT data, there is now good evidence to recommend that people in advanced stages of the disease should also take part in a targeted training programme.”

The “OnkoAktiv” network founded at the NCT Heidelberg supports cancer patients with training programmes close to home.

Source: German Cancer Research Center (Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, DKFZ)