Most ischaemic stroke patients taking the anticoagulant warfarin were no more likely than those not on the medication to experience a brain bleed when undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers report in a new study. The findings, published in JAMA, could help doctors better gauge the risk of EVT, widening the pool of patients for this intervention.
“Although not very common, patients taking warfarin may still experience a stroke. In clinical practice, it’s very possible that some physicians may withhold an endovascular thrombectomy because patients have been treated with warfarin before their strokes. Our study could increase the number of patients for whom this lifesaving and function-saving surgery would be appropriate,” said study leader Ying Xian, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology at UT Southwestern.
EVT – a surgery that removes the clot by threading instruments through the blood vessels – is the most common treatment for acute ischaemic stroke. EVTs can sometimes cause potentially fatal symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH), Dr Xian explained. Although warfarin is a known risk factor for bleeding, it’s been unknown whether the risk of sICH following EVT is higher for stroke patients who have been on the blood thinner.
To help answer this question, Dr Xian worked with Eric Peterson, MD, MPH, Professor of Internal Medicine at UTSW, along with colleagues from other medical institutions across the country. Together, they gathered data on 32 715 stroke patients who underwent EVT within six hours of stroke symptom onset between 2015 and 2020. Data came from the American Heart Association’s Get with the Guidelines-Stroke registry – the world’s largest registry of stroke patients.
The researchers compared a variety of outcomes for the 3087 patients who took warfarin prior to stroke and the 29 628 patients who did not take any blood thinner. They evaluated whether patients experienced sICH within 36 hours of their EVT procedure, whether they had a serious systemic haemorrhage, or whether they had other complications that required additional medical intervention or an extended hospital stay. Researchers also tracked complications from additional therapies that reintroduced blood flow in the brain, in-hospital deaths, and discharges to hospice care.
After adjusting for differences inherent to patients taking or not taking warfarin, the researchers found no difference in overall risk of sICH or other adverse outcomes in patients in these two groups. However, patients with an international normalised ratio (INR) greater than 1.7 – a measure of clotting tendency of blood in patients taking warfarin – the risk of experiencing sICH increased by about 4%.
Whether this effect translates into worse outcomes for patients is unclear, Dr Peterson said. Except for higher risk of bleeding, these patients with INRs greater than 1.7 were no more likely than those not taking warfarin to die or have worse functional outcomes at discharge.
“Physicians must evaluate stroke patients on a case-by-case basis to determine whether EVT is appropriate, but our study suggests that taking warfarin alone should not necessarily be a limiting factor,” he added.
Drs Xian and Peterson said they are planning to study whether other anticoagulants frequently taken by patients at risk of stroke might increase the risk of sICH or other serious complications following EVT for ischaemic stroke.
Source: UT Southwestern Medical Center
