A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine shows that, after taking haemoglobin levels into count, sex and previous pregnancy of blood donors do not affect the survival of patients receiving red blood cell transfusions. Differences in recipient survival depend rather on the haemoglobin quantity in the transfusion, the researchers found.
Female donor sex and previous pregnancy are established risk factors for transfusion-related acute lung injury following plasma and platelet transfusions, which is a leading cause of transfusion-related mortality.
Previous studies have produced conflicting results as to how donor sex affects the recipient’s survivability in the recipient following red blood cell transfusion. Some studies have indicated higher mortality in patients who have received red blood cells from women, in men who have received red blood cells from women who have been pregnant, and in sex-mismatched transfusions. Other studies, however, have not reported such correlations.
This question has now been further explored by researchers from Karolinska Institutet in a register study of almost 370 000 patients in Sweden who received a red blood cell transfusion for the first time between 2010 and 2018.
The aim of the study was to see how the sex and previous pregnancy status of the donor affects survival in the recipient within two years from transfusion. It also looked at how the risk of needing more transfusions differed between patients who received red blood cells from female and male donors. Blood from women on average contains less haemoglobin than blood from men, meaning that more transfusions might be required to obtain the desired level of haemoglobin in a recipient.
The study demonstrates that the median value for haemoglobin was lower in female blood donors (135g/L than male (149g/L) and that patients who received blood from a woman had a 12% higher risk of needing another transfusion within 24 hours than blood from a man. However, this sex difference was eliminated when adjusting for the donors’ haemoglobin levels, which the researchers say was an expected effect that had not been factored into previous studies.
“When we take into account the lower haemoglobin levels in blood from women, we see no difference in survival among patients who received a blood transfusion from women compared with from men, regardless of how many times the female donors had been pregnant and of the patients’ sex and age,” said the study’s first author Jingcheng Zhao, adjunct researcher at Karolinska Institutet. “Differences in haemoglobin levels are a source of error that previous studies have not taken into consideration and that might explain the conflicting results that has been seen previously.”
Data for the study was drawn from national population, health and blood donor registries. The study also shows that donor sex is naturally randomly distributed in the patient material since no regard is paid to the sex and previous pregnancies of the donors by the blood donor centres when supplying blood. According to the researchers, this means that more far-reaching conclusions be drawn.
Dr Zhao said this allows them to determine causality. “We’ll now continue developing methods for studying causal relationships in transfusion epidemiology using observational data, on things like donor characteristics and how blood is handled. There’s still much we don’t know about blood transfusion and its effects.”
One limitation is that it was not possible to separately study transfusions where the red blood cells had not undergone leukoreduction (the filtering out of white blood cells), since this procedure has been standard in Sweden since the 1990s. The researchers therefore add a caveat about generalizing the conclusions to erythrocyte concentrates that have not undergone leukoreduction, which, however, is relatively uncommon now.
Source: Karolinska Institutet
