Day: March 30, 2022

Categories : Mental Health PaediatricsTags :

Negative Effects of Social Media on Girls and Boys

On By ModernMedia
Photo by freestocks on Unsplash

Girls and boys might be more vulnerable to the negative effects of social media use at different times during their adolescence, according to a study in Nature Communications. Girls were found to experience a negative link between social media use and life satisfaction when they are 11–13 years old and boys when they are 14–15 years old. Increased social media use again predicts lower life satisfaction at age 19 years. At other times the link was not statistically significant.

Since its rapid emergence over a decade ago, social media has prompted concern over its possible impacts on wellbeing, especially in younger people.

A team of researchers analysed two UK datasets which included longitudinal data on 17 400 young people aged 10–21 years old. The team looked for a connection between estimated social media use and reported life satisfaction and found key periods of adolescence where social media use was associated with a decrease in life satisfaction 12 months later. Working backwards, the researchers also found that teens who have lower than average life satisfaction use more social media one year later.

In girls, social media use between ages 11 and 13 was associated with a drop in life satisfaction one year later, whereas in boys this occurred between 14 and 15. This suggests that sensitivity to social media use could be linked to developmental changes, possibly changes in the structure of the brain, or to puberty, which occurs later in boys than in girls.

In both females and males, social media use at the age of 19 years was again associated with a decrease in life satisfaction a year later. The researchers suggest that that social changes at this age, such as leaving home, may make people particularly vulnerable.

At other times, the link between social media use and life satisfaction one year later was not statistically significant. Decreases in life satisfaction also predicted increases in social media use one year later; however this does not change across age and or differ between the sexes.

Dr. Amy Orben, the study leader, said: “The link between social media use and mental wellbeing is clearly very complex. Changes within our bodies, such as brain development and puberty, and in our social circumstances appear to make us vulnerable at particular times of our lives.”

Professor Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, a co-author of the study, said: “It’s not possible to pinpoint the precise processes that underlie this vulnerability. Adolescence is a time of cognitive, biological and social change, all of which are intertwined, making it difficult to disentangle one factor from another. For example, it is not yet clear what might be due to developmental changes in hormones or the brain and what might be down to how an individual interacts with their peers.”

Dr. Orben added: “With our findings, rather than debating whether or not the link exists, we can now focus on the periods of our adolescence where we now know we might be most at risk and use this as a springboard to explore some of the really interesting questions.”

A further complication is that social media use can negatively impact wellbeing, but also the reverse is true, previously reported and confirmed by this study.

The researchers stress that these population-level findings do not predict which individuals are most vulnerable.

Professor Rogier Kievit said: “Our statistical modeling examines averages. This means not every young person is going to experience a negative impact on their wellbeing from social media use. For some, it will often have a positive impact. Some might use social media to connect with friends, or cope with a certain problem or because they don’t have anyone to talk to about a particular problem or how they feel—for these individuals, social media can provide valuable support.”

Professor Andrew Przybylski said: “To pinpoint which individuals might be influenced by social media, more research is needed that combines objective behavioural data with biological and cognitive measurements of development. We therefore call on social media companies and other online platforms to do more to share their data with independent scientists, and, if they are unwilling, for governments to show they are serious about tackling online harms by introducing legislation to compel these companies to be more open.”

Source: University of Oxford

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

Caffeine May Help with Cognitive Symptoms of ADHD

On By ModernMedia
Coffee cup and beans
Photo by Mike Kenneally on Unsplash

Researchers in Spain have found that caffeine may be beneficial in alleviating cognitive symptoms of ADHD, such as improving attention span and retention capacity. Their findings, published in Nutrients, may provide a less controversial addition to the therapeutic arsenal for this disorder.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnoses have increased exponentially over the last 20 years. It is currently estimated that this disorder affects between 2% and 5% of children in Spain, an average of one or two children per classroom, and up to 4% of the adult population.

Despite these high incidence rates, controversy surrounds the treatment of this pathology and the therapeutic approach to it. This varies widely depending on each patient, the symptoms they present and their intensity. For this reason, experts are continuing to investigate different components and substances that may be capable of providing new treatment opportunities for patients diagnosed with ADHD.

A team of experts at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) has investigated caffeine to alleviate some of the symptoms of ADHD, given the controversy surrounding the use of some medicines derived from methylphenidate, among others. Their systematic review of animal studies concludes that a prescribed consumption of caffeine can increase attention and retention capacity in adolescents and adults with ADHD.

“The therapeutic arsenal for alleviating ADHD is limited, and there is a certain degree of controversy around the use of some types of medications and stimulants, especially during childhood and adolescence. That’s why it’s useful to study the efficacy of other substances, such as caffeine,” explained Javier Vázquez, one of the paper’s main authors.

This is the first systematic review with results linking caffeine consumption in different animal models of ADHD with an increased attention span, improved concentration, learning benefits, and improvements in some types of memory.

“This substance improves these types of cognitive procedures, and increases capacity and flexibility in both spatial attention and selective attention, as well as in working memory and short-term memory,” emphasised Vazquez, who added that controlled treatment with this substance “doesn’t alter blood pressure, and doesn’t lead to an increase or reduction in body weight.”

The researchers point out that while possibly effective for cognitive symptoms, the results are unclear for other characteristic symptoms of ADHD, such as hyperactivity and impulsivity. “The results are very positive, but we must be much more careful when prescribing a caffeine-based medical treatment for these symptoms. In diagnoses in which the problem is purely attentional, caffeine may be an appropriate therapy, but if there’s a symptomatological presence of hyperactivity or impulsivity, we must be more cautious,” said Vasquez.

However, the results show that caffeine has a clear benefit in ADHD’s cognitive symptoms. “Our results reinforce the hypothesis that the cognitive effects of caffeine found in animal models can be translated and applied in the treatment of ADHD in people, especially at young ages such as adolescence,” the authors concluded.

“We want to emphasise that we aren’t against medication for ADHD, but we’re open to investigating all possible alternatives for improving this type of disorder, and for being able to use caffeine from a therapeutic point of view with all the appropriate medical supervision, a prescribed treatment and follow-up,” said Vázquez.

Source: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)

Categories : Genetics PaediatricsTags :

Cancer Drugs May Help Children with Severe Congenital Myopathy

On By ModernMedia
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

For the first time, children with severe congenital myopathy may have a better chance at learning to walk thanks to a new therapeutic approach using enzyme-inhibiting cancer drugs, as reported in the journal eLife.

Professor Susan Treves remembers seeing one child affected by the condition at the age of six months. The boy seemed more like a newborn, she said. Today, several years later and thanks to intensive physiotherapy, he is at least able sit. “He made it,” she said. As yet there is no cure for children like this one. Their first priority is survival. Another child with mutations in the same gene as the boy mentioned above, did not survive. However, his genetic alterations now form the basis of a therapeutic approach presented by the research group led by Professors Susan Treves and Francesco Zorzato.

The affected gene is for the calcium channel RYR1 in skeletal muscle. The mutations render the gene useless, which severely impacts muscle function. The researchers used the gene alterations found in a patient, as a template to develop a mouse model for this type of congenital myopathy. “The mice don’t die, but their muscle system is severely impaired,” says Treves. “They’re smaller, and move much less.” With a combination of two drugs, however, the research team was able to significantly improve muscle function and movement of the mice.

The therapy is based on the observation that certain enzymes are produced in excessive quantities in the skeletal muscles of affected patients. These enzymes – histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases – affect how densely genes are packed, making them less accessible to the cellular machinery that reads them and translates them into instructions for protein production.

Prof Treves and her team used inhibitors against these enzymes, which are already approved as cancer drugs or are in clinical trials. The treatment significantly improved the mice’s movement ability, although they were still smaller. No adverse side effects were noted during the study period.

The approach is still far from being a clinical therapy, said Prof Treves. “But it’s a first step in the right direction.” The researchers aim to further optimise the treatment and test combinations of newly developed drugs targeting the same enzymes for even better effects. “We anticipate around about two more years of optimisation and testing before we can initiate a phase I clinical trial,” she said.

For Profs Treves and Zorzato, these first promising results are the culmination of 10 years of research – especially as Prof Zorzato was the one who first isolated the gene affected in these muscle disorders years ago. “We’ve now succeeded in bridging the gap from the isolation of the affected gene to a therapeutic approach,” said Prof Treves.

Source: University of Basel

Categories : COVIDTags :

Prior COVID Infection Results in Robust Immunity after Vaccination

On By ModernMedia
Vaccine injection
Image source: NCI on Unsplash

New research published in the journal JCI Insight shows that immune responses to the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine differ significantly in individuals depending on whether or not they had a prior COVID infection. Notably, those who had COVID before vaccination produced a surge of antibodies after the first dose, with little or no increase seen after the second dose. The opposite pattern was observed in infection-naïve individuals.

“Our study shows that the presence of immune memory induced by prior infection alters the way in which individuals respond to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination,” explained first author Professor Steven G. Kelsen. “The lack of response after the second vaccine dose in previously infected individuals is especially relevant, because it could mean that some people may require only one dose or could potentially skip the booster shot.”

Prof Kelsen and colleagues carried out the study in health care workers, some having previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and others never having been infected. The researchers measured levels of neutralising antibodies in blood samples taken at three different time points, including before vaccination and after each vaccine dose. They also performed qualitative assessment for local reactions and systemic symptoms, such as fever, headache, and fatigue, associated with vaccination.

While levels of neutralising antibodies hit their maximum in some people with prior COVID after the first vaccine dose, individuals with no history of infection showed massive responses after the second dose. Those high levels also plummeted quickly, while the COVID group retained longer lasting immunity, despite the lack of response to a second dose. However, prior infection was also linked to more frequent and longer-lasting adverse reactions to the vaccine.

“Previous studies had similarly reported long-lasting immunity and strong immune reactions in COVID patients,” Prof Kelsen said. “We now provide new information on how prior infection interacts with vaccination in terms of measurable immune response and how individuals react to mRNA vaccines based on infection history.”

The next steps for Prof Kelsen and collaborators are to modify their neutralising antibody assay to detect Omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants. “We also are interested in understanding how long protection from a booster dose of the vaccine lasts,” he said.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : NeurologyTags :

The Claustrum: A Mysterious Brain Region Involved with Pain

On By ModernMedia
Man wearing mask with headache
Source: Usman Yousaf on Unsplash

A new review paper, published in the journal Brain, has shown that a mysterious brain region called the claustrum may play an important role in the experience of pain. This densely interconnected, but difficult to access area of the brain may be the next frontier in improving outcomes for brain damage patients.

The claustrum is a brain region that has been investigated for over 200 years, yet its precise function remains unknown. A 2005 article suggested it to be critically linked to consciousness, which spurred a renewed interest in this region, with recent research revealing its high level of interconnectedness.

Credit: Oxford University

Oxford University researchers reviewed studies of patients with rare cases of lesions in the claustrum, which show cognitive impairments and seizures. There may be many more cases to be uncovered due to the lack of clinical focus on the claustrum.

They also uncovered an underappreciated link between the claustrum and pain. It is already known that there are links between the claustrum and perception, salience and the sleep-wake cycle, but this is the first time a research team has shown how the claustrum might be more involved in the debilitating experience of pain.

Dr. Adam Packer, the lead author of the study, says that “The problem with understanding how the claustrum works is that it is deep inside the brain, and damage that is specific to it is a very rare occurrence. What makes it more difficult to work out what the claustrum actually does is that these rare occurrences are also linked to such a broad range of symptoms.”

“Clearly, when the claustrum is damaged the effects are severe and better therapies are urgently needed. It is possible that claustrum damage is more common than we currently realise, and it may be a crucial component in many more brain damage cases.”

“This work is important because it gives us some insight into the cognitive and neurological processes in which the claustrum may be involved, and gives us targets to pursue in basic research in the lab.”

The researchers found several recorded instances of either infection, autoimmune, or other process that attacked the claustrum in particular, and by analysing the results of these studies and others the most common symptoms in patients were cognitive impairment and seizures.

Additional research is needed for a better understanding of the claustrum and the impact of damage to the claustrum, which could eventually change clinical guidelines.

Source: University of Oxford