Day: February 14, 2022

Improving Attitudes to Ageing Measurably Improves Health

Photo by Loren Joseph on Unsplash

Helping people feel better about how they are ageing could result in real improvements in health and well-being later on, according to research from the University of British Columbia which was published in JAMA Network Open.

Over a four-year period, researchers tracked changes in how participants felt about their own ageing, then looked for measurable changes in health and well-being after another four years had passed. Those participants whose attitudes had improved over the first four years were more likely to have measurable health improvements in the next four years.

“Prior research has looked at how psychological risk factors like depression and stress might adversely influence health and well-being outcomes, but we are interested in factors that might positively influence health and well-being outcomes,” said Julia Nakamura, a graduate student in UBC’s department of psychology and first author of the study. “With further research, our findings suggest that interventions to increase aging satisfaction might improve the health and well-being of our rapidly growing older adult population.”

Health and well-being are gaining favor as indicators of societal progress, over pure economic indicators. Governments and intergovernmental organisations have recognised that using gross domestic product as the primary measure of success can lead to policies that devalue environmental, psychological and social health. Increasingly, they are looking for more holistic ways to measure societal well-being.

In this study, more than 13 000 adults over age 50 contributed data through the Health and Retirement Study in the U.S. between 2008 and 2018. The research team analysed participants’ data at three separate intervals, four years apart.

At the first interval, the researchers recorded initial measures of health and well-being. They also captured aging satisfaction through participants’ responses to statements such as:

  • Things keep getting worse as I get older.
  • I am as happy now as I was when I was younger.
  • The older I get, the more useless I feel.

At the second interval, they assessed ageing satisfaction again.

At the third and final interval, they measured how health and well-being measures had changed four years after the second measurement of aging satisfaction.

Of the 35 outcomes they measured, 27 had improved in association with improved aging satisfaction four years earlier. Decreases in ageing satisfaction from the first to second interval were associated with worsening health and well-being outcomes by the third interval.

The order in which these measurements were taken is important. People in better health could be expected to have more positive attitudes about ageing than those with health problems, but this analysis in fact showed that increases in ageing satisfaction clearly preceded improvements in health and well-being.

“Interventions that make people feel better about aging could potentially produce concrete benefits,” said Nakamura. “Those interventions could come at both the individual level and the broader, societal level. At the societal level, combating ageism and reducing harmful stereotypes about aging are potential paths to improving individual aging satisfaction. If a person thinks ageing is destined to be a negative experience, that might become a self-fulfilling prophecy.”

Source: University of British Columbia

HIV Co-discover Dies

HIV Infecting a T9 Cell. Credit: NIH

Luc Montagnier, the French virologist credited as being a co-discoverer of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), has died aged 89. He jointly received the 2008 Nobel Prize was jointly awarded to Montagnier for his work in isolating the virus.

He was lauded for his crucial research, but in later life he was criticised for unscientific claims about autism and COVID.

Local news site FranceSoir reported that he died on Tuesday in Neuilly-sur-Seine “surrounded by his children”.

The virologist first began working on the virus in the early 1980s while at the Pasteur Institute in France. Montagnier and his team examined tissue samples from patients who had the mysterious new syndrome.

In 1983, Luc Montagnier’s team at the Pasteur Institute in Paris discovered HIV‑1. They cultured T cells from a lymph node biopsy from a 33-year-old homosexual French patient with symptoms that can precede AIDS (subsequently called pre-AIDS), such as lymphadenopathy. 
Finding that they had isolated a retrovirus, they were able to infect T cells from a healthy donor, but were unable to infect other cell types, including B cells and fibroblasts. 

The group concluded that this patient at risk for AIDS was infected with a T cell–tropic retrovirus; however they could only tentatively associate it with AIDS. In 2008, Luc Montagnier and Françoise Barré-Sinoussi from his team were awarded the Nobel Prize for the isolation and characterisation of HIV-1.

However, US scientist Robert Gallo published similar findings in the same edition of Science in which the Pasteur team had announced theirs. He later concluded that the virus caused Aids. This led to years of heated debate over who actually discovered HIV.

Gallo revealed in 1991 that the virus he found came from the Pasteur Institute the year before, and the two men publicly agreed in 2002 that Montagnier’s team discovered HIV, but that Gallo first showed its role in causing Aids.

However, when Montagnier and Barré-Sinoussi were awarded the Nobel Prize in 2008 for their work – alongside Harald zur Hausen for his work on cervical cancer – the committee made no mention of Gallo, which provoked controversy.

Later on, Montagnier attracted great criticism for a series of unscientific claims, including over the causes of autism and later over the origins of COVID.

French media first reported that he had died at the American hospital in Neuilly-sur-Seine on 8 February, and his death was officially declared by authorities some time later.

Source: BBC News

Teratogenic Drug Exposures Found in 1 in 16 Pregnancies

Source: Pixabay

Researchers have found, after reviewing a database containing 3 million pregnancies, that 1 in 16 women were exposed to teratogenic drugs.

The study, published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, highlights the need for women and their providers to carefully examine medications taken during pregnancy.

A teratogen is a substance that interferes with the normal development of a foetus. Hundreds of such drugs have been identified, including medications to treat seizures, migraines, obesity, acne, hypertension, bipolar disease and cancer.

University of Florida researchers investigated more than 200 teratogenic drugs and evaluated their exposure among 3.4 million pregnancies identified in a national private insurance database from 2006 to 2017. Prenatal exposure was defined by the mother taking at least one teratogenic drug during pregnancy.

The researchers divided drugs into two classes based upon their known teratogenic effect. About 140 drugs were known to have definite teratogenic effects, with another 65 identified as having potential teratogenic effects. The proportion of pregnancies with exposure to definite teratogens decreased slightly over the 12-year study period from 1.9% to 1.2%, while exposures for potential teratogens increased from 3.4% to 5.3%.

“While declining exposure rates among teratogenic drugs with definite risk are encouraging, the rising prenatal exposure to drugs with potential risk calls for more assessment,”  study author Professor Almut Winterstein, PhD, RPh. “To have 1 in 16 women and their unborn baby exposed to a teratogenic medication is simply too high, and we must identify strategies to improve pregnancy outcomes.”

The study also examined age and risk for prenatal exposure to teratogenic drugs and found teenagers and women in their 40s had the greatest risk. Both groups are known to have more unintended pregnancies and the drug exposure may have been accidental, which points to the need for more information about effective birth control and family planning when using teratogenic drugs.

The researchers were especially interested in prenatal exposure during more recent years, following the enactment of FDA requirements for risk mitigation strategies. Those are designed to reinforce safe medication-use behaviors, such as a pregnancy test before a teratogenic drug is started, and only a few medications require this extra safety precaution.

The 12 drugs with mitigation protocols in the study were found to be used infrequently and contributed to only a small portion of prenatal exposures. More research and regulatory action are needed to optimise the use of medications during pregnancy, the researchers concluded.

“There is much to do to address the evidence available regarding the risk-benefit of many drugs during pregnancy, and the availability of adequate risk-mitigation programs that ensure pregnancies are not unnecessarily exposed to teratogenic drugs,” Prof Winterstein said. “In the meantime, women and their providers must rely on the written information that is provided about the teratogenic risk for drugs during pregnancy.”

Source: University of Florida

ICD-11 Comes into Effect

Source: Pixabay

The World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that the Eleventh Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) has now come into effect, with the latest update going online on Friday, 11th February.

Compared with previous versions, ICD-11 is entirely digital with a new user-friendly format and multilingual capabilities that reduce the chance of error. It has been compiled and updated with input from over 90 countries and unprecedented involvement of health-care providers, enabling evolution from a system imposed on clinicians into a truly enabling clinical classification and terminology database that serves a broad range of uses for recording and reporting statistics on health. It also allows entries to appear in multiple categories: for example, stroke appears under both the cardiovascular and neurological categories.

“International classification of diseases is the cornerstone of a robust health information system”, said Dr Samira Asma, the Assistant Director-General for Data, Analytics and Delivery for Impact at the World Health Organization (WHO). “ICD has been instrumental in helping us respond to the COVID pandemic using standardised data and continues to be crucial for tracking progress towards universal health coverage. We hope all countries will take advantage of ICD-11’s powerful new features.”

Among other updates, ICD-11 improves the clarity of terms for the general public and facilitates the coding of important details such as the spread of a cancer or the exact site and type of a fracture. The new version also includes updated diagnostic recommendations for mental health conditions and digital documentation of COVID certificates.

These updates reflect recent progress in medicine and advances in scientific understanding. For example, codes relating to antimicrobial resistance are now aligned with the Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS). ICD-11 is also more capable of capturing data on health-care safety, thus identifying and reducing unnecessary events that may harm health such as unsafe workflows in hospitals.

ICD is used by health insurers who make reimbursement decisions on the basis of ICD coding, by national health programme managers, by data collection specialists, and by anyone who tracks progress in global health and determines health resource allocation.

“A key principle in this revision was to simplify the coding and provide users with all necessary electronic tooling – this will allow health-care professionals to more easily and completely record conditions,” says Dr Robert Jakob, Team Lead, Classifications Terminologies and Standards, WHO.

In addition to coding and capability updates, ICD-11 includes new chapters on traditional medicine, sexual health, and gaming disorder – which has now been added to the section on addictive disorders.

ICD-11 was adopted at the World Health Assembly in May 2019 and Member States committed to start using it for mortality and morbidity reporting in 2022. Since 2019, early adopter countries, translators, and scientific groups have recommended further refinements to produce the version that is posted online today.

Source: World Health Organization

New Insights on Antibiotic-caused Diarrhoea

Streptococcus pneumoniae. Credit: CDC

A study may have found that a effects on a key gut bacteria are the reason why some patients experience diarrhoea after receiving the widely prescribed antibiotic amoxicillin-clavulanate

Researchers, reporting in the journal iScience, found that the level of gut Ruminococcaceae, which plays a role in maintaining an individual’s gut health, strongly impacts diarrhoeal outcomes following antibiotic treatment.

One in three patients prescribed amoxicillin-clavulanate will develop diarrhoea. In some cases, it may be so severe that doctors have to prematurely halt the antibiotic, inadequately treating the infection or else forcing a change in antibiotics. The diarrhoea could also prolong patients’ hospital stays and further exposing them to hospital-acquired infections.

“The problem is very real for patients who are unable to take amoxicillin-clavulanate because it gives them diarrhoea, even though it is an effective and affordable antibiotic for their infection. Knowing why may help us identify those at risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, and devise treatment strategies in the future to minimise or avoid such adverse effects,” said lead researcher Dr Shirin Kalimuddin.

The study recruited 30 healthy volunteers, each receiving a three-day oral course of amoxicillin-clavulanate. Their stool samples were collected over four weeks and analysed using gene sequencing to look for changes in the gut microbiome.

Ruminococcaceae levels in the stools of study volunteers who developed diarrhoea were significantly lower when compared to those who did not, both before and during treatment with amoxicillin-clavulanate. This suggests that individuals may, depending on their gut composition, be predisposed to antibiotic-associated diarrhea. The team further devised a simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test based on levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a species within the Ruminococcaceae family, that could potentially be used in clinical settings to quickly determine an individual’s risk of developing diarrhea with amoxicillin-clavulanate treatment.

“People respond differently to medication. Understanding this response and the ability to predict those at risk will help guide the development of point-of-care diagnostics,” said lead researcher Professor Eric J. Alm.

“While a lot of attention has been paid to how DNA influences a person’s response to medication, the impact of the gut microbiome on the human drug response has not been widely researched. Our findings provide evidence that an individual’s gut microbial composition can influence the risk of developing antibiotics-associated diarrhoea. Tested against amoxicillin-clavulanate, the study provides a framework to identify other potential causes of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in relation to other classes of antibiotics,” added Prof Alm.

The next step would be a clinical trial to determine whether certain Ruminococcaceae could be used as a probiotic to prevent diarrhoea in patients prescribed antibiotics.

Source: EurekAlert!