“The vast majority” of urine tests conducted prior to scheduled surgeries to check for infections “were not plausibly indicated,” according to US researchers in a study of claims data.
Though the individual tests were inexpensive at $17 each, over the study’s 11-year duration they came to $50 million, plus another $5 million for antibiotics prescribed to patients with no clinical signs of infection.
“Patients and society bear the risk of inappropriate antibiotic use, which can result in adverse drug reactions, increased risk of infections such as Clostridioides difficile, and emergence of antibiotic resistance,” wrote authors Erica Shenoy, MD, PhD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and two colleagues in a JAMA Internal Medicine research letter, published in the journal’s ‘Less Is More’ series which highlights overused tests and treatments.
Once, preprocedural urinalyses were routinely done to check for infections that could increase complication risk. However studies have since shown that such testing rarely improves outcomes or even changes clinical management. Organisations such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the US Preventive Services Task Force have recommended against testing and prescribing for asymptomatic infections except in certain narrow indications.
To see just how common the practice has been, the researchers used data on some 13 million procedures performed from 2007 to 2017 from Medicare and the IBM Watson Marketscan database of commercial insurance claims, spanning 14 specialties. The researchers did not count kidney and urological surgeries since urinalysis is recommended by guidelines for most such procedures.
Urinalysis was deemed appropriate for the others when urinary tract symptoms, fever, or altered mental state was mentioned. Without those codes, the procedures were “not plausibly indicated.”
While 75% of surgeries in the data did not involve preprocedural urinalysis, suggesting good adherence, in the 25% that did, fully 89% across all types of surgery had no apparent indication; with the lowest non-indicated testing rate being 84%.
The results show that traditional practice patterns “remain entrenched”, according to the researchers, who called on insurers to take more steps to be more aggressive in denying claims for unneeded testing.
Limitations included incomplete patient data as patients may have had legitimate indications for testing and antibiotic prescriptions that were not recorded with the relevant diagnostic codes. Also, about half of the 11-year study period preceded the movement to limit ‘low-value’ testing.
Source: MedPage Today
