AstraZeneca announced that its type 1 interferon receptor antagonist anifrolumab (Saphnelo) has received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus alongside standard therapy.
“This is wonderful, exciting news, and is great for the lupus community — patients, family members, and clinicians who treat patients,” said Richard Furie, MD, chief of rheumatology at Northwell Health in Great Neck, New York, in an interview.
Only belimumab (Benlysta) in 2011 and voclosporin (Lupkynis) for lupus nephritis a few months ago had been approved in the past decades. “And that represents 25 years of trying,” Dr Furie said.
Significant benefits were reported in 2016 in a phase IIb trial known as MUSE. In that trial, 62.6% of patients receiving 300 mg intravenous anifrolumab every 4 weeks had an SLE Responder Index score of 4 (SRI-4) plus a reduction in the steroid dose to less than 10 mg/day compared with only 17.6% of patients in the placebo group, which was a significant difference — the best lupus trial data so far, according to Dr Furie.
Two pivotal phase III trials, TULIP-1 and TULIP-2, followed, with conflicting results.
In TULIP-1, the primary endpoint of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI-4) was not met. After a year, an SRI-4 response was seen in 36% of patients receiving anifrolumab and in 40% on placebo. Some secondary endpoints suggested benefits, including the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA).
In TULIP-2, patients were randomised 300 mg intravenous anifrolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 48 weeks, with a BICLA response as the primary endpoint. After a year, 47.8% of patients in the anifrolumab group achieved a BICLA response compared with 31.5% of placebo patients.
“We were all shocked when TULIP-1 failed,” said Dr Furie, who is also a leading member of the Lupus Research Alliance’s Lupus Clinical Investigators Network. “But it didn’t really fail — it depends on how you define failure. It did not reach the primary endpoint, but on the other composite, BICLA, it was successful, as well as on a lot of the key secondary endpoints. The totality of the data, I think, is the key phrase,” he said.
“I think the two studies were more similar than dissimilar. You have to have an appreciation of how difficult it is doing clinical trials in lupus. For every one trial that has been successful, there have probably been 10 that were unsuccessful,” he said.
This was not the first time discordant results had been seen in lupus trials. “We also saw discordance between the BICLA and SRI in the ustekinumab phase II trial,” he noted.
Source: MedPage Today
