Neural Control of Prosthetic Ankle Can Restore Agility

Female athlete with prosthetic leg relaxes on a sporting field. Photo by Anna Shvets from Pexels

A recent case study demonstrates that, with training, neural control of a prosthetic ankle with a powered joint can restore agility. 

Traditional prosthetic ankle joints result in slower walking and abnormal gaits due to the way they differ from normal human ankles in distributing walking loads. Autonomously controlled powered prosthetic ankles can restore additional function to users by providing the extra work involved in a natural walking gait. However, they are currently only designed to assist walking or standing, and not to tackle specialised tasks such as squatting.

“This case study shows that it is possible to use these neural control technologies, in which devices respond to electrical signals from a patient’s muscles, to help patients using robotic prosthetic ankles move more naturally and intuitively,” said corresponding author Helen Huang, Jackson Family Distinguished Professor in the Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering at NC State and UNC

“This work demonstrates that these technologies can give patients the ability to do more than we previously thought possible,” says Aaron Fleming, first author of the study and a Ph.D. candidate in the joint biomedical engineering department.

Most research on robotic prosthetic ankles has focused on autonomous control, meaning that the prosthesis handles the fine motions when the wearer decides to walk or stan.

Huang, Fleming and their collaborators sought to find out if amputees could be trained to use a neurally controlled prosthetic ankle to regain more control in the many common motions that people make with their ankles beyond simply walking.

Their powered prosthesis reads electrical signals from two residual calf muscles, which are responsible for controlling ankle motion, and converts the signals into commands for moving the prosthesis.

The researchers recruited a study participant with an amputation between the knee and the ankle, and fitted the powered prosthetic ankle on the participant and did an initial evaluation. Over two and a half weeks, the participant then had five, two-hour training sessions with a physical therapist. A second evaluation was conducted on training completion.

Having had the training, the participant was able to perform a variety of previously challenging tasks, such as going from sitting to standing without any external assistance or squatting to pick something up without compensating for the movement with other body parts. However the participant’s own stability, both self-reported and empirically measured in such tests as standing on foam, was dramatically improved.

“The concept of mimicking natural control of the ankle is very straightforward,” Huang said. “But implementation of this concept is more complicated. It requires training people to use residual muscles to drive new prosthetic technologies. The results in this case study were dramatic. This is just one study, but it shows us what is feasible.”

“There is also a profound emotional impact when people use powered prosthetic devices that are controlled by reading the electrical signals that their bodies are making,” Fleming said. “It is much more similar to the way people move intuitively, and that can make a big difference in how people respond to using a prosthesis at all.”

More participants are already undergoing the training, with the researchers expanding their testing to match. But before this technology is made more widely available, the researchers would like real-world testing, with the prosthesis being used in people’s daily routines.

“As with any prosthetic device for lower limbs, you have to make sure the device is consistent and reliable, so that it doesn’t fail when people are using it,” Huang said.

“Powered prostheses that exist now are very expensive and are not covered by insurance,” Fleming explained. “So there are issues related to access to these technologies. By attempting to restore normal control of these type of activities, this technology stands to really improve quality of life and community participation for individuals with amputation. This would make these expensive devices more likely to be covered by insurance in the future if it means improving the overall health of the individual.”

The researchers are currently working with a larger group of study participants to see how broadly applicable the findings may be.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Fleming, A., et al. (2021) Direct continuous electromyographic control of a powered prosthetic ankle for improved postural control after guided physical training: A case study. Wearable Technologies. doi.org/10.1017/wtc.2021.2.