Doctors must carefully weigh the pain relief value of opioids for patients against their potential for misuse and inducing opioid addiction even in patients with no history of substance abuse. Now, a new study challenges current practice by showing the effectiveness of an approach that takes a middle way to giving opioids.
Some 16 million people around the world suffer from opioid use disorder, which can result from opioid administration from surgery and for chronic pain. Opioids are highly addictive, with tolerance reached in days and addiction can occur within a matter of weeks, so there is every incentive to minimise exposure of patients to these effective but potentially dangerous medications.
To investigate the effectiveness of minimising opioid use, a team from Michigan Medicine at the University of Michigan conducted a study with 620 patients who had surgery in hospitals across Michigan, had their anaesthetic usage tracked, and filled in surveys within one to three months following their surgeries. The patients were split equally into two groups.
The first group received pre-surgery counseling emphasising non-opioid pain treatment as their first option. Some patients in this group received small, “just in case” prescriptions, but a third of them didn’t receive any opioid prescription at all after surgery.
The patients in the other group received standard care, that is, receiving the usual amount of opioids prescribed after such operations. The prescriptions received in fact were larger than in the opioid sparing group. Most patients didn’t take all of the pills, which if left lying around could be used inappropriately.
Patients in the two groups had the same surgery: either gallbladder removal, full or partial thyroid removal or hernia repair. However, both groups reported equal levels of quality of life and satisfaction with care when followed-up. Most surprisingly, the opioid-sparing group reported less pain overall.
First author Maia Anderson, MD, a resident in the U-M Department of Surgery, said: “It’s so exciting to think about the potential for opioid sparing postoperative pathways to not only reduce the risk of opioids for our patients, but also to substantially decrease the risk of opioid diversion into our communities.”
Senior author Ryan Howard, MD, Surgical Resident, Michigan Medicine commented: “We know that opioids pose serious risks to patients after surgery. We can protect patients from those risks by reducing or eliminating opioids after surgery. But that idea always raises the concern that patients will have uncontrolled pain and feel miserable. This study suggests that’s not the case – patients who get small opioid prescriptions, or even no prescription, are just as satisfied with their recovery after surgery.”
Source: News-Medical.Net
Journal information: Anderson, M., et al. (2020) Patient-Reported Outcomes After Opioid-Sparing Surgery Compared With Standard of Care. JAMA Surgery. doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5646.
